Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process

The functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process in the Bulinskii form for great and small times is proved.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2007
Main Authors: Budkov, D.S., Makhno, S.Ya.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Інститут математики НАН України 2007
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/4503
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process / D.S. Budkov, S.Ya. Makhno // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2007. — Т. 13 (29), № 3. — С. 22–28. — Бібліогр.:3 назв.— англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1859642315338940416
author Budkov, D.S.
Makhno, S.Ya.
author_facet Budkov, D.S.
Makhno, S.Ya.
citation_txt Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process / D.S. Budkov, S.Ya. Makhno // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2007. — Т. 13 (29), № 3. — С. 22–28. — Бібліогр.:3 назв.— англ.
collection DSpace DC
description The functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process in the Bulinskii form for great and small times is proved.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T13:22:58Z
format Article
fulltext Theory of Stochastic Processes Vol. 13 (29), no. 3, 2007, pp. 22–28 UDC 519.21 DMITRII S. BUDKOV AND SERGEY YA. MAKHNO FUNCTIONAL ITERATED LOGARITHM LAW FOR A WIENER PROCESS The functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process in the Bulinskii form for great and small times is proved. 1. Introduction. Let w(t) be a d-dimensional Wiener process on the probability space (Ω,F , P ), t ≥ 0. Introduce the sequence of random processes ξn(t) = w(nt)√ nϕ(n) , n = 3, 4, ... (1) where ϕ(n) is an arbitrary sequence. In [1], A.V. Bulinskii proved a version of the Strassen iterated logarithm law in which the normalizing function ϕ(n) is an arbitrary monotone increasing function. Let us formulate this result. Denote, by C([0, 1]; Ed), the space of all continuous functions x(t) on the interval [0, 1] with values in the Euclidean space (Ed, | · |) and with norm ||x|| = sup t∈[0,1] |x(t)|, (2) Let K1([0, 1]; Ed) be the space of functions x(t) ∈ C([0, 1]; Ed) such that x(0) = 0 and x(t) = ∫ t 0 ẋ(s)ds for some function ẋ(·) ∈ L2([0, 1]; Ed). We set ||x||K1 = ||ẋ||L2([0,1];Ed). (3) Following [1], we define Φ as a class of all increasing functions ϕ(t), t ≥ 0, such that limt→∞ ϕ(t) = ∞. Now we introduce a functional J(ϕ, r, c) = ∞∑ k=1 exp {−rϕ2([ck]) 2 } , c > 1, (4) where [·] denotes the integer part of a number. For every ϕ ∈ Φ, we denote R2(ϕ) = inf{r > 0 : J(ϕ, r, c) < ∞}, (5) and R(ϕ) = ∞ if there exists no r < ∞ such that J(ϕ, r, c) < ∞. Let us remark that if J(ϕ, r, c0) < ∞ for a certain c0 > 1, then J(ϕ, r, c) < ∞ for every c > 1. Let KR = {x(t) ∈ K1, ||x||K1 ≤ R2}. In [1, Theorem 1], the following result was proved. Bulinskii theorem. For ϕ ∈ Φ, the limit set of sequence (1), t ∈ [0, 1], coincides with KR, and R = R(ϕ) is defined in (5). 2000 AMS Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 60H10, 60H20. Key words and phrases. Wiener process, Strassen iterated logarithm law, Bulinskii iterated logarithm law. 22 FUNCTIONAL ILL FOR A WIENER PROCESS 23 In [1, Theorem 3], it was proved that R can be defined as R = 1 Q , where Q = lim t→∞ ϕ(t)√ 2 ln ln t . This theorem yields the usual functional Strassen iterated logarithm law and allows us to study the asymptotic behavior of the process ξn(t) for normalizing functions ϕ(n) such that limt→∞ ϕ(t)√ 2 ln ln t = ∞. In the present article, we generalize this result in two directions. First, we consider sequence (1) on the whole time axis and, second, we prove a local version of the Bulinskii theorem. 2. Functional iterated logarithm law on the whole time axis. Let C([0,∞); Ed) denote the space of all continuous functions on [0,∞) with values in Ed. We set Θ = { θ ∈ C([0,∞) : Ed) : θ(0) = 0, lim t→∞ |θ(t)| t = 0 } . On this space, we define the metric ||θ||Θ = sup t≥0 | θ(t)| 1 + t . (6) Then (Θ, ||·||Θ) is a separable Banach space. Let H1([0,∞); Ed) be the space of functions θ ∈ Θ such that θ(t) = ∫ t 0 θ̇(s)ds for some θ̇ ∈ L2([0,∞); Ed). We define ||θ||H1 = ||θ̇||L2([0,∞);Ed). (7) Lemma. There exists the bijective correspondence between the spaces K1([0, 1]; Ed) and H1([0,∞); Ed). If f ∈ K1([0, 1]; Rd), then g(t) = ∫ t 0 ḟ ( s s + 1 ) 1 1 + s ds ∈ H1([0,∞); Ed). (8) Conversely, if g ∈ H1([0,∞); Rd), then f(t) = ∫ t 0 1 1 − s ġ ( s 1 − s ) ds ∈ K1([0, 1]; Ed). (9) Furthermore, ||g||H1([0.∞);Ed) = ||f ||K1([0,1];Ed). Proof. Let f ∈ K1([0, 1]; Ed). It is necessary to prove that, for the function g(x) from (8), lim t→∞ |g(t)| t = 0. (10) According to the Cauchy–Buniakowski inequality, |g(t)|2 = ∣∣∣ ∫ t t+1 0 ḟ(s) 1 1 − s ds ∣∣∣2 ≤ ||f ||2K1 ∫ t t+1 0 1 (1 − s)2 ds = t||f ||2K1 . This yields (10). It is easy to verify the equality of norms. Lemma is proved. In what follows, we will use the Schilder theorem [2, Theorem 1.3.27] on large devia- tions of a Wiener process with small variance. For convenience, we present its formula- tion. Define I(ψ) = ⎧⎨ ⎩ 0, if ψ /∈ H1([0,∞); Ed), 1 2 ||ψ||H1 , if ψ ∈ H1([0,∞); Ed). 24 DMITRII S. BUDKOV AND SERGEY YA. MAKHNO Schilder theorem. Let Wε(·) be the measure corresponding to a process εw(t) on the space Θ with a Borel σ-algebra B. Then a) for any closed set A ∈ B, lim ε→0 ε2Wε(A) ≤ − inf{I(ψ); ψ ∈ A}; (11) b)for any open set B ∈ B, lim ε→0 ε2Wε(B) ≥ − inf{I(ψ); ψ ∈ B}. (12) The functional I(ψ) is called the action functional for a family Wε(·). For any a < ∞, the set {ψ : I(ψ) ≤ a} is closed in the space (Θ,B). Introduce a class of functions LR : LR = {θ(t) ∈ H1 : ||θ||H1([0,∞);Ed) ≤ R2}, (13) where R = R(ϕ) is defined in (5). Theorem 1. For ϕ ∈ Φ with probability 1, the set of limit points of sequence (1) is LR, where R is defined in (5). Proof. We prove the theorem in three standard steps. Let us denote nk = [ck], zk(t) = ξnk (t). Step 1). We need to prove that, for every R2 < ∞, every c > 1, and every δ > 0, there exists a positive integer k0 such that, for every k > k0, ρ(zk,LR) < δ. (14) We set Nδ = {ψ : ρ(ψ,LR) ≥ δ}. Then there exists η > 0 such that inf ψ∈Nδ I(ψ) ≥ R2 2 + η. As the set Nδ is closed, relation (11) yields P { zk ∈ Nδ } ≤ exp { − ϕ2(ck) (R2 2 + η )} By the definition of the number R, we have ∑ k P { zk ∈ Nδ } < ∞. By applying the Borel–Cantelli lemma, we get (14). Step 1) is proved. Step 2). For R2(ϕ) < ∞, we need to prove that every limit point of the sequence ξn(t) is an element of LR. If n = nk, thos follows from step 1). Let now n ∈ [nk, nk+1]. Denote ψ(n) = √ nϕ(n). Since the function ψ(n) is nondecreasing, we can write 1 ψ(n) = αnk ψ(nk) + βnk ψ(nk+1) , (15) where αnk ≥ 0, βnk ≥ 0 and αnk +βnk = 1. Set z̃nk(t) = αnkzk(t)+βnkzk+1(t). We note that, for large k, the functions z̃nk ∈ {f : ρ(f,LR) < δ}. This follows from the fact that if the functions x(t), y(t) ∈ LR and α, β ≥ 0, α + β = 1, then αx(t) + βy(t) ∈ LR. The assertion of step 2) will be proved if we prove the following estimate: for every δ > 0, there exist a number c > 1 and a positive integer k0 such that, for every k > k0, sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup n∈[nk,nk+1] |ξn(t) − z̃nk(t)| < δ (16) with probability 1. From (15), we have ξn(t) = w(nk n nk t) ψ(n) = zk ( n nk t )ψ(nk) ψ(n) = αnkzk ( n nk t ) + βnkzk+1 ( n nk+1 t ) . FUNCTIONAL ILL FOR A WIENER PROCESS 25 Hence, |ξn(t) − z̃nk(t)| ≤ ∣∣∣zk(t) − zk ( n nk t )∣∣∣ + ∣∣∣zk+1(t) − zk+1 ( n nk+1 t )∣∣∣ (17) Then sup n∈[nk,nk+1] ∣∣∣zk(t) − zk ( n nk t )∣∣∣ ≤ sup s∈[t,ct] |zk(t) − zk(s)|. (18) Similarly, sup n∈[nk,nk+1] ∣∣∣zk+1(t) − zk+1 ( n nk+1 t )∣∣∣ ≤ sup s∈[ t c ,t] |zk+1(t) − zk+1(s)|. (19) For an arbitrary fixed c, we introduce the sets Lδ and Mδ: Lδ = { f(t) ∈ Θ : sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] |f(s) − f(t)| ≥ δ } , Mδ = { f(t) ∈ Θ : sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[ t c ,t] |f(s) − f(t)| ≥ δ } From (17)–(19), we get P { sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup n∈[nk,nk+1] |ξn(t) − z̃nk(t)| ≥ δ } ≤ P{zk ∈ L δ 2 } + P{zk+1 ∈ M δ 2 }. (20) The sets Lδ and Mδ are closed in Θ for every c < ∞. We prove this assertion, for example, only for the set Lδ. Let fn(t) ∈ Lδ and limn→∞ ||fn − f ||Θ = 0. Then the inequalities δ ≤ sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] |fn(s) − fn(t)| ≤ sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] |fn(s) − f(s)|+ + sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] |f(s) − f(t)| + sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] |fn(t) − fn(t)| ≤ ≤ sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] (1 + s) |fn(s) − f(s)| 1 + s + sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] |f(s) − f(t)|+ + ||fn − f ||Θ ≤ c||fn − f ||Θ + sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] |f(s) − f(t)| + ||fn − f ||Θ yield δ ≤ (1 + c)||fn − f ||Θ + sup t≥0 1 1 + t sup s∈[t,ct] |f(s) − f(t)|. Passing to the limit in the last inequality as n → ∞, we obtain f ∈ Lδ. Applying (11), we have P{zk ∈ L δ 2 } ≤ exp{−ϕ2(nk) inf f∈Lδ I(f)}. (21) Since sup s∈[t,ct] |f(s) − f(t)|2 = sup s∈[t,ct] ∣∣∣ ∫ s t ḟ(u)du ∣∣∣2 ≤ (c − 1)tI(f), we get δ2 4 ≤ sup t≥0 1 (1 + t)2 sup s∈[t,ct] |f(s) − f(t)|2 ≤ c − 1 4 I(f) for f ∈ L δ 2 . If we choose c = 1 + 2δ2 R2 , then inf f∈Lδ I(f) ≥ R2 2 . (22) 26 DMITRII S. BUDKOV AND SERGEY YA. MAKHNO Relations (21) and (22) and the definition of R2 yield ∑ k P{zk ∈ L δ 2 } ≤ ∑ k exp { − ϕ2(nk) R2 2 } < ∞. (23) In an analogous way, we can prove for the same c that∑ k P{zk+1 ∈ M δ 2 } ≤ ∑ k exp { − ϕ2(nk) R2 2 } < ∞. (24) From (20), (23), (24) and the Borel–Cantelli lemma, we get (16). Thus, step 2) is proved. Step 3). In order to complete the proof of Theorem 1, we need to prove that if R2 ≤ ∞, then every g ∈ Lr is a limit point of zk for r < R. That is, there exists a sequence nk such that, with probability 1, lim k→∞ ρ(ξnk , g) = 0. (25) Applying the Itô formula to the Wiener process w(t) and to the function f(s, x) = n n−s(x, a) s ∈ [0, tn t+n ], n > 0, a is an arbitrary vector from Ed, we have t + n n ( w ( tn t + n ) , a ) = ∫ tn t+n 0 n (n − s)2 (w(s), a) ds + ∫ tn t+n 0 n n − s (dw(s), a). Whence we get∫ tn t+n 0 n n − s dw(s) = t + n n w ( tn t + n ) − ∫ tn t+n 0 n (n − s)2 w(s) ds = = t + n n w ( tn t + n ) − 1 n ∫ t 0 w ( vn v + n ) ds. (26) The random process ηn(t) = ∫ tn t+n 0 n n−s dw(s) is a process with independent increments, because it is defined on nonintersecting intervals by independent increments of the Wiener process. By the property of stochastic integrals, we have E exp { iλ(ηn(t) − ηn(s)) } = exp { − λ2 2 ∫ tn t+n sn s+n n2 (n − u)2 du } = exp { − λ2 2 (t − s) } . Hence, the process ηn(t) is also a Wiener process for any n. From (26), we obtain η̃n(t) = ηn(nt)√ nϕ(n) = (t + 1) w ( n t t+1 ) √ nϕ(n) − ∫ t 0 w ( n s s+1 ) √ nϕ(n) ds. (27) Let a function g ∈ Lr . Define a function f(t) by (9). By virtue of the lemma, f ∈ Kr. It follows from (8) that the function g(t) admits the representation g(t) = (t + 1)f ( t t + 1 ) − ∫ t 0 f ( s s + 1 ) ds. (28) From (27) and (28), we get η̃n(t) − g(t) = (t + 1) [ w ( n t t+1 ) √ nϕ(n) − f ( t t + 1 )] − ∫ t 0 [ w ( n s s+1 ) √ nϕ(n) − f ( s s + 1 )] ds. Whence |η̃n(t) − g(t)| 1 + t ≤ ∣∣∣∣∣ w ( n t t+1 ) √ nϕ(n) − f ( t t + 1 )∣∣∣∣∣+ t 1 + t sup t∈[0,1] |ξn(t) − f(t)|. FUNCTIONAL ILL FOR A WIENER PROCESS 27 Thus, ||η̃n − g||Θ ≤ 2||ξn − f ||, and { ||ξn − f || < δ } ⊂ { ||η̃n − g||Θ < 2δ } . (29) As has been stated above, the law of the process ηn(t) is the same as that of the process w(t). Therefore, P { ||η̃n − g||Θ < 2δ } = P { ||ξn − g||Θ < 2δ } . (30) Consider the events Ak = {||ξnk − f || < δ}, Bk = {||η̃nk − g||Θ < 2δ}, Ck = {||ξnk − g||Θ < 2δ} By the Bulinskii theorem, there exists a sequence nk such that, for the processes ξn(s) for s ∈ [0, 1] and every δ- neighborhood of the function f : P{ξnk ∈ (f)δ i.o.} = 1, (31) where i.o. means ”infinitely often”. Equality (31) yields P { ∞⋂ m=1 ∞⋃ l=m Al } = lim m→∞P { ∞⋃ l=m Al } = 1. By virtue of (29), Ak ⊂ Bk. Hence, P { ∞⋂ m=1 ∞⋃ l=m Bl } = lim m→∞P { ∞⋃ l=m Bl } ≥ lim m→∞P { ∞⋃ l=m Al } = 1. For this reason, the events Bk take place infinitely often, and lim k→∞ P (Bk) = 1. ¿From this and (30), we get P { ∞⋂ m=1 ∞⋃ l=m Cl } = lim m→∞P { ∞⋃ l=m Cl } ≥ lim m→∞P { Cm } = lim m→∞P { Bm } = 1. (32) It follows from (32) that, with probability 1, the events Ck take place infinitely often. Equality (25) and Theorem 1 are proved. 3. Small-time functional iterated logarithm law. We will prove a result similar to Theorem 1 for the process wn(t) = w( t n )√ 1 nϕ(n) , t ∈ [0,∞), n ≥ 3. (33) To this end, we make use a method from [3]. On the space Θ, we define a time inversion transformation T by the formula (Tθ)(t) = ⎧⎨ ⎩ 0, t = 0, t θ( 1 t ), t > 0. In [3], it is noted that the transformation T is bijective on Θ. Furthermore, T is an isometry from Θ onto Θ and from H1 onto H1: ||θ||Θ = ||Tθ||Θ, ||θ||H1 = ||Tθ||H1 . (34) Theorem 2. For ϕ ∈ Φ, the set of limit points of sequence (33) is LR with probability 1, where R is defined in (5). 28 DMITRII S. BUDKOV AND SERGEY YA. MAKHNO Proof. We denote w̃(t) = (Tw)(t) = ⎧⎨ ⎩ 0, t = 0, t w( 1 t ), t > 0. It is known that w̃(t) is also a Wiener process. For t > 0, w̃(nt)√ nϕ(n) = t w(1 t 1 n )√ 1 nϕ(n) . (35) From (35), we get sup t≥0 1 1 + t ∣∣∣∣∣ w̃(nt)√ nϕ(n) − (Tf)(t) ∣∣∣∣∣= sup t≥0 1 1 + t ∣∣∣∣∣wn(t) − f(t) ∣∣∣∣∣. (36) Suppose that there exists a subsequence nk such that lim nk→∞ ||wnk − f ||Θ = 0. (37) From (36), we have lim nk→∞ sup t≥0 1 1 + t ∣∣∣∣∣ w̃(nkt)√ nϕ(nk) − (Tf)(t) ∣∣∣∣∣= 0. (38) According to Theorem 1, we conclude that (Tf)(t) ∈ LR. Then relations (34) imply that f(t) ∈ LR. Thus, each limit point of the sequence wn(t) is an element of LR. Conversely, let a function f(t) ∈ LR. Then, by (34), the function (Tf)(t) ∈ LR and, by virtue of Theorem 1, there exists a subsequence nk such that lim nk→∞ sup t≥0 1 1 + t ∣∣∣∣∣ w̃(nkt)√ nϕ(nk) − (Tf)(t) ∣∣∣∣∣= 0. This relation and (36) yield (37). Theorem 2 is proved. Bibliography 1. A.V. Bulinskii, Large deviations of diffusion processes with discontinuous drift and their occu- pation times, Theory Appl. Probab 19 (1980), 509-524. 2. J.D. Deuschel, D.W. Stroock, Large Deviations, Academic Press, Boston, 1989. 3. N. Gantert, An inversion of Strassen’s law of the iterated logarithm for small time, Annals of Probability. 21(2) (1993), 1045-1049. E-mail : budkov@iamm.ac.donetsk.ua E-mail : makhno@iamm.ac.donetsk.ua
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-4503
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 0321-3900
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T13:22:58Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Budkov, D.S.
Makhno, S.Ya.
2009-11-19T13:57:42Z
2009-11-19T13:57:42Z
2007
Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process / D.S. Budkov, S.Ya. Makhno // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2007. — Т. 13 (29), № 3. — С. 22–28. — Бібліогр.:3 назв.— англ.
0321-3900
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/4503
519.21
The functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process in the Bulinskii form for great and small times is proved.
en
Інститут математики НАН України
Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process
Budkov, D.S.
Makhno, S.Ya.
title Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process
title_full Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process
title_fullStr Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process
title_full_unstemmed Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process
title_short Functional iterated logarithm law for a Wiener process
title_sort functional iterated logarithm law for a wiener process
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/4503
work_keys_str_mv AT budkovds functionaliteratedlogarithmlawforawienerprocess
AT makhnosya functionaliteratedlogarithmlawforawienerprocess