A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers

Four bred grapevine varieties released for commercial cultivation in Ukraine, namely ‘Antey Magarachskii’, ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’, ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ and ‘Rubin Golodrigi’, and their putative parental forms were genotyped using six microsatellite loci. Четыре селекционных сорта винограда Антей Ма...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в: :Цитология и генетика
Дата:2010
Автори: Goryslavets, S., Risovanna, V., Bacilieri, R., Hausman, J.-F., Heuertz, M.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Інститут клітинної біології та генетичної інженерії НАН України 2010
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/66706
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers / S. Goryslavets, V. Risovanna, R. Bacilieri, J.-F. Hausman, M. Heuertz // Цитология и генетика. — 2010. — Т. 44, № 2. — С. 29-37. — Бібліогр.: 29 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1859765292714950656
author Goryslavets, S.
Risovanna, V.
Bacilieri, R.
Hausman, J.-F.
Heuertz, M.
author_facet Goryslavets, S.
Risovanna, V.
Bacilieri, R.
Hausman, J.-F.
Heuertz, M.
citation_txt A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers / S. Goryslavets, V. Risovanna, R. Bacilieri, J.-F. Hausman, M. Heuertz // Цитология и генетика. — 2010. — Т. 44, № 2. — С. 29-37. — Бібліогр.: 29 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Цитология и генетика
description Four bred grapevine varieties released for commercial cultivation in Ukraine, namely ‘Antey Magarachskii’, ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’, ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ and ‘Rubin Golodrigi’, and their putative parental forms were genotyped using six microsatellite loci. Четыре селекционных сорта винограда Антей Магарачский, Рубиновый Магарача, Рубин Голодриги и Гранатовый Магарача, которые культивируются в Украине для приготовления сухих и крепленых вин, и их предполагаемые родительские формы были генотипированы с использованием шести микросателлитных локусов. Чотири селекційних сорти винограду Антей Магарацький, Рубіновий Магарача, Рубін Голодриги та Гранатовий Магарача, що культивують в Україні для приготування сухих і десертних вин, та їх потенційні батьківські форми були генотиповані з використанням шести мікросателітних локусів.
first_indexed 2025-12-02T05:25:47Z
format Article
fulltext УДК 634.85:631.526.32:577.21(477) S. GORYSLAVETS 1, V. RISOVANNA 1, R. BACILIERI 2, J.�F. HAUSMAN 3, M. HEUERTZ 3, 4, 5 * 1 National Institute for Vine and Wine «Magarach»; Ampelography, Breeding and Genetics of Grapevine, Yalta, Ukraine E�mail: goricvet_2@rambler.ru 2 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre INRA de Montpellier 2 Place Viala, 34000 Montpellier, France 3 Centre de Recherche Public�Gabriel Lippmann; Environment and Agro�Biotechnology; rue du Brill 41; L�4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg 4 Université Libre de Bruxelles; Evolutionary and Ecology cp160/12; av. F.D. Roosevelt 50; B�1050 Brussels, Belgium 5 Centre of Forest Research CIFOR�INIA; Forest Systems and Resources; ctra. de la Coruña km 7.5; E�28040 Madrid, Spain A PARENTAGE STUDY OF CLOSELY RELATED UKRAINIAN WINE GRAPE VARIETIES USING MICROSATELLITE MARKERS Four bred grapevine varieties released for commercial cul� tivation in Ukraine, namely ‘Antey Magarachskii’, ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’, ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ and ‘Rubin Golodrigi’, and their putative parental forms were genotyped using six microsatellite loci. Genotypes were compared with breeding records to verify genetic relationships among varieties. Results of the analysis confirmed four of six parent�offspring relation� ships. Results of the analysis allow to assume that genotype ‘Seyve Villard 20347’ is the direct parent of ‘Antey Magarachskii’ instead of its grandparent. The first�studied accession believed to be that of Granatovyi Magaracha was identified as impurity. In order to verify the parentage of Granatovyi Magaracha, rest accessions of that variety and its putative parent Antey Magarachskii were additionally geno� typed at 13 nuclear loci and at three chloroplast loci. The par� ent�offspring relationship was confirmed, as all Granatovyi Magaracha accessions had a common allele with the parent variety Antey Magarachskii at each locus and the same chlorotype A. Different Granatovyi Magaracha accessions could have been obtained via vegetative propagation of two seedlings which arose from one crossing. Introduction. The south of Ukraine has a long� standing tradition of growing table and wine grape varieties. The latter are made into wines distin� guished for their excellent quality. Recently, new wine grapes produced by generative breeding are being introduced into commercial cultivation. This helps improving and enlarging the countryґs wine grape assortment since such varieties have better economical characters. Four newly�bred promising vintage varieties are the focus of this paper: ‘Rubin Golodrigi’, bred in 1974 and released by the Research Company «Ampelos»; ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’, ‘Antey Magarachskii’, and ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ were bred, respec� tively, in 1928, 1971 and 1982 and released by the National Institute for Vine and Wine «Magarach». These varieties are highly resistant to diseases and can be elaborated into table and dessert wines. They have started to be widely grown in Russia and in Ukraine. ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’ and ‘Rubin Golodrigi’ have juicy fruits with a flavour of the berry of nightshade. ‘Antey Magarachskii’ has fruits with a crisp juicy flesh distinguished for chocolate flavours. Unlike the above�mentioned grapes, the fruit of ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ produces coloured juice, enabling its use as teinturier [1]. An impressive diversity of varieties, forms and species are involved in grapevine breeding. Their origin is sometimes uncertain, which is why their identification and the characterization of variety pedigrees is an important task. The need to iden� tify interspecific grapevine hybrids is especially important for the south of Ukraine where grape and wine growing dates back to Greek colonists of antiquity and breeding activities have been extensive since the middle of the 19th century [2]. Historically, ampelographic methods were the only tool used to this end and relied mostly on visual characters of the leaves, clusters and shoot apices. Unfortunately, the potential and useful� ness of this type of identification are restricted due to considerable variation of the characters and subjectivity of human estimates. Recently, microsatellite markers (simple sequence repeats – SSRs) have come into use to investigate genetic diversity of grapevine [3, 4] and to establish genetic relationships among varieties [5–8]. They offer a number of advantages, including high polymorphism and a co�dominant mode of inheritance. They allow a precise molecular fin� gerprint of grape genotypes and have proved to be the most informative and popular type of DNA ІSSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 2 29 © S. GORYSLAVETS, V. RISOVANNA, R. BACILIERI, J.�F. HAUSMAN, M. HEUERTZ, 2010 markers as concerns identification of varieties and determination of their parentages [3, 5, 7–11]. The four varieties in the focus of this paper have already been studied for a number of years using conventional ampelographic characters, biochem� ical indices and several morphometric variables [12–14]. They constitute valuable breeding mate� rial and have been used in numerous crossings. ‘Antey Magarachskii’ is a parent of several new varieties, such as ‘Krasen’, ‘Pamyati Golodrigi’, ‘Safyanovyi’ and of eleven new forms. We report here on genetic fingerprinting of the four varieties and four putative parents of them in order to eval� uate their parentages suggested by breeding records. The research was done at the Centre de Recherche Public – Gabriel Lippmann (Luxem� bourg) and the National Institute for Vine and Wine «Magarach» (Yalta, Ukraine) in the frame� work of the international project «Conservation and Sustainable Use of Grapevine Genetic Resources in the Caucasus and in the Northern Black Sea Region» coordinated by Bioversity International (formerly: IPGRI). The accessions of the variety Granatovyi Magaracha and Antey Magarachskii were genotyped at the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA, France) in the context of a research programme supported by the National Institute of Agricultural Research of France (called ECO�NET). Materials and Methods. Plant material and DNA extraction. The plant material used for genetic characterization in this study are four wine grape varieties with black berries, namely ‘Antey Maga� rachskii’, ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’, ‘Granatovyi Ma� garacha’ and ‘Rubin Golodrigi’and some of their putative parents, namely the Georgian autochtho� nous variety ‘Saperavi’, the old Moldavian variety ‘Maiskii Chernyi’, the widely grown French vari� ety ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ and the Vitis interspecif� ic hybrid Seyve Villard 20347 (Table 1). ‘Rubin Golodrigi’, ‘Antey Magarachskii’ and ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ possess multiple resistances to pests and diseases [15, 16]. These varieties are of complex interspecific origin since Vitis interspecific hybrids (‘Seyve Villard 20347’, ‘Magarach 6–68–27’, ‘Ma� garach 85–64–16’, etc.) are reported to have been used as their parents at different stages of the breeding process (Figure). The variety ‘Saperavi’ is a teinturier with a lot of pigments in its skins, which encourages its use as a colour�enhancing element in white and red wine technologies [17, 18]. Unfortunately, all putative parents could not be analysed since some of them have been lost. For DNA extraction young shoots without symptoms of pathology were collected from accessions of the test varieties growing in the collection of the Institute «Magarach» (experiment farm in the village of Vilino, Ukraine). The shoots were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at a temperature of –86 °С. DNA was extracted from the leaf tissue follow� ing the method of Lefort and Roubelakis� Angelakis [19]. In order to standardize genotyping results according to the «European Vitis Database», we additionally analysed 28 varieties [20] for which genotypes were published in This et al. [21]. Cuttings from accessions of these varieties were kindly provided by Dr. Didier Vares from the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Vassal, France. Buds were dissected out and DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin Plant kit (Macherey Nagel). Accessions of ‘Cabernet Sau� vignon’ from both the collection of the «Magarach» Institute in Ukraine and from the INRA Vassal collection in France have been included in the analysis. Microsatellite analysis. We chose six microsatellite primers widely used for genetic fin� gerprinting of grape varieties and recommended by «Bioversity International» and the «European Vitis Database» [21]: VVS2 [22], VVMD5, VVMD7 [23, 24], VVMD27 [24], VrZAG62 and VrZAG79 [25]. PCRs (10 μl) were performed using 0.25 U of FideliTaq polymerase (GE Healthcare), 1X reaction buffer (10 mM Tris�HCl (pH 8.6), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2) (GE Healthcare), 2 mM of each dNTP, 0.4 μM of each primer and 1 μl of DNA extract diluted 40 times than give concentrations. PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °С for 4 min, 40 cycles of 94 °С for 30 sec, 52 °С for 20 sec, 72 °С for 1 min, followed by a final extension for 7 min at 72 °С and cooling to 4 °С. The forward primer of each microsatellite locus was labelled with a fluorescent dye (6�FAM, PET, NED or VIC, Table 2) to visualize PCR amplifica� tion products from all loci in the same analysis run on an automated monocapillary sequencer (ABI Prism 310, Applied Biosystems). Allele sizes were ISSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 230 S. Goryslavets, V. Risovanna, R. Bacilieri, J.�F. Hausman, M. Heuertz ІSSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 2 31 A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties Table 1 Grape cultivars included in this study and parentage information on them on basis breeding reports Genus Vitis Vitis Vitis Vitis Vitis Vitis Vitis Vitis Species Hybrid * Hybrid vinifera L. Hybrid vinifera L. vinifera L. Interspeci� fic cross vinifera L. Antey Maga� rachskii Granatovyi Magaracha Cabernet Sauvignon Rubin Golo� drigi Rubinovyi Magaracha Saperavi Seyve Villard 20347 Maiskii Chernyi Magarach 70�71�52 Magarach 77�81�3 Magarach 15�74�29 Magarach 56 Perle Noire German black Variety name Possible synonyms Parentage (A � B) Use (W, Wine grape; T, Table grape) T, W W W W W W T, W W Rubinovyi Maga� racha � Magarach 85�64�16 Antey Magarachskii � � Magarach 11�57�130 Cabernet franc � Sau� vignon blanc Rubinovyi Magara� cha � Magarach 6�68�27 Cabernet Sauvignon � � Saperavi Unknown V. vinifera � Seyve Villard 12358 Unknown Breeding station NIVW «Maga� rach» ** NIVW «Maga� rach» Old French va� riety Research Com� pany «Ampelos» NIVW «Maga� rach» Autochtonous Georgian vari� ety Old Moldavian variety Authors P. Golodriga, V. Usatov, L. Troshin, Yu. Mal’chikov, N. Dubovenco V. Usatov, L. Kireeva, P. Go� lodriga, L. Troshin, V. Vo� linkin, V. Klimenko, N. Ole� ynikov, Yu. Mal’chikov P. Golodriga, M. Kostik, V. Yurchenko N. Paponov, V. Zotov, P. Tsa� rev, P. Golodriga Seyve Villard * Accessions are qualified as hybrids if they have a complex genetic background, involving some non�vinifera varieties. **NIVW: National Institute for Vine and Wine. VVS2 dye:6�FAM *, stdized to n = 123 ** VVMD5 dye: PET stdized to n = 222 VVMD7 dye:6�FAM stdized to n = 232 VVMD27 dye: NED stdized to n = 175 Variety Cabernet Sauvignon Rubinovyi Magaracha Saperavi Antey Magarachskii Granatovyi Magaracha N1 Maiskii Chernyi Rubin Golodrigi Seyve Villard 20347 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 250 240 240 240 250 240 252 250 252 232 240 232 240 224 240 226 232 234 234 226 234 232 240 226 232 139 151 133 151 133 145 133 145 133 145 143 143 133 151 145 149 175 189 0 0 189 192 179 189 0 0 179 189 192 194 179 189 188 194 188 200 188 200 186 188 196 196 188 194 194 200 186 194 248 248 248 262 244 262 248 256 244 244 238 244 246 248 256 262 VrZAG62 dye: VIC stdized to n = 174 VrZAG79 dye: NED stdized to n = 238 Table 2 Allele compositions of eight grape genotypes analysed with 6 microsatellite loci (VVS2, VVMD5, VVMD7, VVMD27, VrZAG62 and VrZAG79) standardized to allele sizes published in This et al. [21]. Missing data are coded with «0» * The fluorescent dyes used to label forward primers of each locus were 6�FAM, PET, NED or VIC. ** Allele sizes are expressed in base pairs (bp). *** «Stdized to n = 123» means that the length of the shortest PCR product discovered at that particular by This et al. [21] was 123 bp; it is the allele size to which PCR fragment lengths in this study were standardized. determined as PCR product lengths by compari� son with an internal size standard (GeneScanTM 500 LIZ�) using GeneMapper 3.0 software (both Applied Biosystems). They were recorded in base pairs (bp) with a two decimals precision. The com� parison of the allele sizes obtained for reference varieties to the This et al. [21] data allowed stan� dardization of allele size of the complete data set in order to achieve compatibility with the format of the European Vitis Database. In order to verify the parentage of Granatovyi Magaracha, two others accessions of that variety (Granatovyi Magaracha N2 and N3) and its par� ent Antey Magarachskii were additionally ana� lyzed for 13 nuclear loci and for three chloroplast loci at the Institut National de la Recherche Agro�nomique (INRA, France) on an automated capillary sequencer (ABI Prism 3130X, Applied Biosystems). Data analysis. Genetic diversity statistics of each locus in the total number of eight target genotypes were computed using the SPAGeDi version 1.2 software [26]. Diversity was estimated as number of alleles and expected heterozygosity (gene diversity). First degree parentage relation� ships (parent�offspring relationships) were iden� tified using GIMLET version 1.3.3 [27]. Absolute coefficients of molecular coancestry (kinship) between pairs of varieties were computed as aver� ages over loci according to Lynch and Walsh [28]. The coefficient of coancestry between two vari� eties is defined as the probability that two ran� domly drawn genes at a locus, one in each variety, are identical by descent. In our estimation, we assume that genes are identical by descent if they show the same PCR product length in microsatellite analysis, i.e. if they are identical in state. We hence do not account for possible inbreeding of varieties. The reason for this is that the base population of the varieties from which inbreeding coefficients could be computed is unknown. Results and Discussion. Genotypes of eight focal (Table 2) and twenty�eight reference varieties ISSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 232 S. Goryslavets, V. Risovanna, R. Bacilieri, J.�F. Hausman, M. Heuertz Crossing records of the focal varieties and their parental forms. Varieties subjected to genetic analysis are marked with an asterisk (*). Relationships suggested by genetic fingerprinting are depicted with bold arrows. The dotted arrow represents a new relationship suggested by genetic data. The parent�offspring relationship between ‘Antey Magarachskii’ and ‘Granatovyi Magaracha N1’ suggested from the breeding design was not confirmed with genetic data (bold bars) [20] were obtained at six microsatellite loci. The accession of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ from the col� lections of the Institute «Magarach» was found to be genetically identical to that of INRA at all six microsatellites. No clear amplification product could be obtained in ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’ and ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ at locus VVMD27 despite repetitive PCRs. Non�amplification might be due to a mutation in one of the PCR primer annealing sites, causing a «null allele» [29]. The missing data are coded with «0». Genetic diversity statistics of microsatellite loci are summarized in Table 3. The total number of alleles observed at the six loci was 30. The lowest polymorphism was observed at locus VVMD7 with 3 alleles and a level of het� erozygosity equal to HE = 0.508, the highest poly� morphism occurred at VVS2 and VrZAG79 with each 6 alleles and heterozygosity equal to HE = = 0.833 (Table 3). Putative first degree parentage relationships among the focal varieties were identified using GIMLET v1.3.3 software and compared with the available crossing records (Figure). ‘Rubinovy Magaracha’ was found to be a compatible off� spring of a cross between ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ and ‘Saperavi’, sharing 50 % of its allele compo� sition with each of its putative parents. Similarly, the genetic data confirmed that both ‘Rubin Golodrigi’ and ‘Antey Magarachskii’ were com� patible offspring of ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’ used as a female parent, as suggested from the breeding records. Furthermore, ‘Antey Magarachskii’ was a compatible offspring of the parent pair ‘Rubi� novyi Magaracha’ and ‘Seyve Villard 20347’. This suggests that ‘Seyve Villard 20347’ could be the direct male parent rather than a grandparent to ‘Antey Magarachskii’. ‘Antey Magarachskii’ is known to be close to its female parental line, especially to the cultivar ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, as concerns morphological characteristics of the leaves and clusters and the taste of the berries. On the other hand good resistance to downy mildew, powdery mildew and adaptation to low tempera� tures is inherited from its male parent, ‘Seyve Villard 20347’. Besides, ‘Antey Magarachskii’ and ‘Seyve Villard 20347’ both have two uses of the fruit, either for fresh consumption or vine making [17]. The genetic data showed that the accession of ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ does not share one allele at each locus with its supposed male parent ‘Antey Magarachskii’; as a matter of fact, three loci (VVMD5, VrZAG62 and VrZAG79) do not support a parent�offspring relationship between ІSSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 2 33 A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties Table 3 Characterization of microsatellite loci of the eight grape genotypes described in this paper. HE: expected heterozygosity or gene diversity Locus VVS2 VVMD5 VVMD7 VVMD27 VrZAG62 VrZAG79 16 16 16 12 16 16 6 5 3 5 5 6 0.833 0.817 0.508 0.788 0.825 0.833 142.0 232.8 243.4 186.3 192.5 249.9 49.6 28.7 27 40.8 25.9 55.2 Number of defined Number of alleles HE Mean allele size Variance of allele size Table 4 Matrix of coancestry coefficients between pairs of varieties. In the absence of inbreeding of the parents, a coancestry coefficient of 0.25 is expected between parent and offspring. Overall high coancestry coefficients highlight the high relatedness of varieties Cabernet Sauvignon Saperavi Rubinovyi Magaracha Antey Ma� garachskii Granatovyi Magaracha Rubin Golodrigi Seyve Villard Maiskii Chernyi Variety Cabernet Sauvignon Saperavi Rubinovyi Magaracha Antey Magarachskii Granatovyi Magaracha Rubin Golodrigi Seyve Villard 20347 Maiskii Chernyi 0.667 0.292 0.500 0.292 0.200 0.333 0.125 0.208 0.583 0.450 0.250 0.400 0.250 0.125 0.208 0.600 0.300 0.250 0.400 0.100 0.150 0.500 0.200 0.167 0.333 0.250 0.900 0.150 0.050 0.300 0.500 0.125 0.083 0.500 0.208 0.583 these varieties. Contrary to other varieties which were heterozygous at four loci at least, ‘Gra� natovyi Magaracha’ was heterozygous only for VVS2 and homozygous for VVMD5, VVMD7, VrZAG62 and VrZAG79. This variety showed therefore the highest coefficient of coancestry with itself (0.90, Table 4). The coancestry coefficient technically corresponds to the inbreeding coeffi� cient of the variety’s selfed offspring. Moreover, ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ also displayed the lowest adaptive variation when morphogenetic responses of the test varieties were studied in vitro [13]. A possible reason for this may be that the variety results from a multi�step breeding process includ� ing self�fertilisation. However, a low degree of allele diversity at neu� tral loci such as microsatellites is not necessarily associated with a low level of adaptive variation and may be merely coincidental. ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ contained alleles that were absent from other genotypes of its putative paternal line (Table 2), namely n + 12 (234) at VVMD5, n + 22 (196) at VrZAG62 and n + 6 (244) at VrZAG79. Two of these alleles (234 at VVMD5 and 244 at VrZAG79) were detected in ‘Maiskii Chernyi’, a putative maternal great�grandparent of ‘Grana� tovyi Magaracha’, indicating that they could have been inherited from the putative female line. Unfortunately, the hybrid form ‘Magarach 11–57–130’ which is the supposed female parent of ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ has been lost, so that it has become impossible to verify this suggestion. Our results indicate that the origin of ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ is so far not clear and needs further investigation. In this connection, the remaining accessions of the variety Granatovyi Magaracha (N2 and N3) growing in the collection of the Institute for Vine and Wine «Magarach» were genotyped at the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA, France). Their relationships with each other and the par� ent�offspring relationship with the putative parent variety Antey Magarachskii were analyzed for 13 nuclear loci (VVIn16, VIp60, VVIv67, VMC4f3, VVIb01, VVMD7, VVMD21, VVMD28, VVIq52, VVIv37, VVS2, VrZAG62 and VrZAG79) and for three chloroplast microsatellite loci (CCMP3, CCMP5 and CCMP10). As a result, it was found that the genotypes of the two accessions were identical to that of Antey Magarachskii at loci VVMD21, VVIq52 and VVIv37 while each acces� sion shared one common allele with Antey Magarachskii at the remaining ten loci (Table 5). Thus, the percentage of shared alleles in the geno� types of the two accessions of Granatovyi Magaracha (0.7) indicates their close relatedness. They could have been obtained via vegetative propagation of two seedlings which arose from one crossing. This is compatible with results of analysis of the accessions for chloroplast microsatellite loci CCMP3, CCMP5 and CCMP10. Chlorotype D ISSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 234 S. Goryslavets, V. Risovanna, R. Bacilieri, J.�F. Hausman, M. Heuertz Table 5 Allele compositions of the parent variety Antey Magarachskii and two asseccions of Granatoviy Magaracha analysed with 13 nuclear loci (VVIn16, VIp60, VVIv67, VVMD7, VVMD21, VMC4f3, VVIb01, VVMD28, VVIq52, VVIv37, VVS2, VrZAG62 and VrZAG79) and for three chloroplast microsatellite loci (CCMP3, CCMP5 and CCMP10) Accession name VVIv67VVIv37VVIq52VVIp60VVIn16 VMD21 VMC4f3 VVIb01 VVMD28 VVMD7 VVS2 VrZAG62 VrZAG79 CCMP3 CCMP5 CCMP10 Haplotip Antey Magarachskii Granatovyi Magaracha N2 Granatovyi Magaracha N3 Accession name Antey Magarachskii Granatovyi Magaracha N2 Granatovyi Magaracha N3 147 151 147 151 147 149 79 79 79 79 79 79 149 159 149 159 149 159 334 368 334 353 334 368 247 247 247 247 247 247 171 171 171 171 171 202 290 294 294 294 290 294 235 235 235 235 235 245 240 250 240 244 240 244 133 145 133 133 133 133 186 188 188 188 188 192 248 256 244 256 244 256 107 106 106 104 105 105 115 114 114 D A A 315 315 315 319 315 319 (107/104/115) was identified in the parent form Antey Magarachskii. The two accessions of Granatovyi Magaracha had the same chlorotype А (106/105/114), which suggest that they descend from one female form as chloroplast inheritance is matrilinear. Thus, analy� sis of the accessions of Granatovyi Magaracha confirmed the parent�offspring relationship of the male parent Antey Magarachskii and the former variety. Overall, fairly high coefficients of coancestry were detected between the varieties investigated (Table 4), considering that many values are higher than 0.25, which is the average expectation for a parent�offspring relationship ignoring inbreeding [28]. However, despite the overall high related� ness, each variety was found to have a unique SSR profile. The results from this study highlight the use� fulness of microsatellites in parentage analysis and for verifying pedigree information in grapevine, as has been observed by other authors [6–8]. Genetic data in our study were compatible with five out of six parent�offspring relationships tested (Figure), and they all included ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’. However, to safely confirm these relationships, data at 30 to 50 micro� satellites would be necessary [24]. Genetic data allowed to identify first�studied accession of Granatovyi Magaracha as impurity and to suggest ‘Seyve Villard 20347’ as the father of ‘Antey Magarachskii’. We are grateful to Dr. V. Klimenko for valuable comments on issues referring to breeding, Dr. Amine Memetova, Ms. Valentina Petrashko and Mr. Sergey Makeiev for their help in collecting plant materials. We thank Dr. Didier Vares from INRA Vassal for providing cuttings of reference varieties, Dr. Patrice This for offer an opportunity to work in the Diversity and Genome laboratory from Centre INRA de Montpellier and Dr. Valerie Laukou from Centre INRA de Montpellier for consultations in microssatel� lite analysis and aleles standartization. This work was funded by the Luxembourg Ministry of Finance, by Bioversity International and by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of France (ECO� NET program). С. Гориславец, В.Рисованная, R. Bacilieri, J.�F. Hausman, M. Heuertz ИЗУЧЕНИЕ РОДОСЛОВНОЙ БЛИЗКОРОДСТВЕННЫХ УКРАИНСКИХ ТЕХНИЧЕСКИХ СОРТОВ ВИНОГРАДА С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ МИКРОСАТЕЛЛИТНЫХ МАРКЕРОВ Четыре селекционных сорта винограда Антей Ма� гарачский, Рубиновый Магарача, Рубин Голодриги и Гранатовый Магарача, которые культивируются в Украине для приготовления сухих и крепленых вин, и их предполагаемые родительские формы были гено� типированы с использованием шести микросателлит� ных локусов. Для оценки генетических взаимоотно� шений полученные генотипы были проанализирова� ны на соответствие их селекционной схеме. Результа� ты анализа подтвердили четыре связи родитель–пото� мок из шести. Результаты проведенного анализа по� зволяют предположить, что генотип Сейв Виллард 20347 является прямым родителем Антея Магарачско� го, а не его прародителем. Проанализированный об� разец сорта Гранатовый Магарача не соответствовал отношению родитель–потомок и был идентифициро� ван как примесь. Чтобы уточнить происхождение упомянутого сорта, остальные два образца были до� полнительно проанализированы по 13 ядерным и трем хлоропластным локусам. Анализ наследования показал, что изученные образцы имели общий мате� ринский хлоротип, а в каждом из 13 локусов имели общий аллель с отцовским сортом Антей Магарач� ский, что соответствует генотипам сеянцев от одного скрещивания. С. Гориславець, В.Рісованна, R. Bacilieri, J.�F. Hausman, M. Heuertz ВИВЧЕННЯ РОДОВОДУ БЛИЗЬКОСПОРІДНЕНИХ УКРАЇНСЬКИХ ТЕХНІЧНИХ СОРТІВ ВИНОГРАДУ З ВИКОРИСТАННЯМ МІКРОСАТЕЛІТНИХ МАРКЕРІВ Чотири селекційних сорти винограду Антей Мага� рацький, Рубіновий Магарача, Рубін Голодриги та Гранатовий Магарача, що культивують в Україні для приготування сухих і десертних вин, та їх потенційні батьківські форми були генотиповані з використан� ням шести мікросателітних локусів. Для оцінки гене� тичних взаємовідносин отримані генотипи були про� аналізовані на їх відповідність селекційній схемі. Ре� зультати аналізу підтвердили чотири зв’язки батько – нащадок із шести. Результати проведеного аналізу до� зволяють припустити, що генотип Сейв Віллард 20347 є прямий батько Антея Магарацького, а не його пра� батько. Проаналізований зразок сорту Гранатовий Ма� ІSSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 2 35 A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties гарача не відповідав відношенню батько – нащадок і був ідентифікований як домішка. Для уточнення по� ходження Гранатовий Магарача решта зразків була до� датково проаналізована за 13 ядерними і трьома хло� ропластними локусами. Аналіз спадкування показав, що вивчені зразки мали материнський хлоротип, а в кожному із 13 локусів мали спільний алель із бать� ківським сортом Антей Магарацький, що відповідає генотипам сіянців від одного схрещування. REFERENCES 1. Трошин Л.П. Производственные сорта винограда Евразии. – Краснодар : Кубан. гос. аграр. ун�т, 2006. – 208 с. 2. Carter J., Pashkevich G. Cultivated plants of the north� ern Pontos during the Greek colonization // Develop� ment of National Programmes on Plant genetic Resources in Southeastern Europe : Proc. Second proj� ect meeting. – Yalta, 2004. – P. 48–49. 3. Sefc K.M., Lopes M.S., Lefort F. et al. Microsatellite variability in grapevine cultivars from different European regions and evaluation of assignment testing to assess the geographic origin of cultivars // Theor. and Appl. Genet. – 2000. – 100. – P. 498–505. 4. Aradhya M.K., Dangl G.S., Prins B.H., Boursiquot J.�M,. Walker M.A., Meredith C.P., Simon C.J., Genetic struc� ture and differentiation in cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera L. // Genet. Res. Cambridge. – 2003. – 81. – P. 179–192. 5. Sefc K. M., Steinkellner H., Glössl J., Kampfer S., Regner F. Reconstruction of a grapevine pedigree by micro� satellite analysis // Theor. and Appl. Genet. – 1998. – 97. – P. 227–231. 6. Bowers J.E., Boursiquot J.M., This P., Chu K., Johansson H., Meredith C. Historical genetics: the parentage of Chardonnay, Gamay and other wine grapes of north� eastern France // Science. – 1999. – 285. – P. 1562– 1565. 7. Vouillamoz J., Maigre D., Meredith C. P. Microsatel� lite analysis of ancient alpine grape cultivars: pedigree reconstruction of Vitis vinifera L. Cornalin du Valais // Theor. and Appl. Genet. – 2003. – 107. – P. 448– 454. 8. Vouillamoz J.F., Maigre D., Meredith C.P. Identity and parentage of two alpine grape cultivars from Switzerland (Vitis vinifera L. Lafnetscha and Himbertscha) // Vitis. – 2004. – 43. – P. 81–87. 9. Faria M.A., Magalhaes R., Ferreira M.A., Meredith C.P., Ferreira Monteiro F. Vitis vinifera must varietal authentication using microsatellite DNA analysis (SSR) // J. Agricult. and Food Chem. – 2000. – 48. – P. 1096–1100. 10. Lefort F., Massa M., Goryslavets S., Risovanna V., Troshin L. Genetic profiling of Moldavian, Crimean and Russian cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. with nuclear microsatellite markers // Oenologie : 7e symp. intern. d’oenologie. – Paris, 2003. – P. 71–73. 11. Martinez L.E., Cavagnaro P.F., Masuelli R.W., Zuniga M. SSR�based assessment of genetic diversity in South American Vitis vinifera varieties // Plant Sci. – 2006. – 170. – P. 1036–1044. 12. Гориславец С.М. Индуцирование ризогенеза экзо� генными фитогормонами у винограда in vitro// Тр. Науч. центра виноградарства и виноделия. – Ялта, 2000. – T. 2, кн.2.– C. 26–29. 13. Гориславец С., Рисованная В. Влияния 2,4�Д, НУК, БАП на индукцию ризогенеза и каллусообразова� ния в первичном каллусе двух сортов винограда // Бюл. Гос. Никит. бот. сада. – 2004. – Вып. 89. – С. 44–47. 14. Гориславец С., Рисованная В., Сказан О. Антоциано� вые профили в каллусной культуре и ягоде окра� шенных сортов винограда // Современные дости� жения биотехнологии в виноградарстве и других отраслях сельского хозяйства : Материалы конф. – Новочеркасск, 2005. – С. 216–225. 15. Ампелография СССР. Отечественные сорта вино� града / Под ред. П.Я. Голодриги. – М.: Легкая про� мышленность, 1984. – 503 с. 16. Костик М.А., Юрченко В.Ю. Виноград XXI века, новые сорта Украины // Виноделие и виноградар� ство. – 2005. – 2. – С. 38–39. 17. Ампелография СССР / Под ред. А.М. Фролова�Баг� реева. – М.: Пищепромиздат, 1954. – 3. – С. 66–95. 18. Ампелография СССР / Под ред. А.М. Фролова�Баг� реева. – М.: Пищепромиздат, 1955. – 5. – С. 203– 230. 19. Lefort F., Roubelakis�Angelakis K.A. Genetic compari� son of Greek cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. by nuclear microsatellite profiling // Amer. J. Enol. and Viticult. – 2001. – 52. – P. 101–108. 20. Heuertz M., Goryslavets S., Hausman J.F., Risovanna V. Characterization of grapevine accessions from Ukraine using microsatellite markers // Amer. J. Enol. and Viticult. – 2008. – 59. – P. 169–178. 21. This P., Jung A., Boccacci P. et al. Development of a standard set of microsatellite reference alleles for iden� tification of grape cultivars // Theor. and Appl. Genet. – 2004. – 109. – P. 1448–1458. 22. Thomas M.R., Scott N.S. Microsatellite repeats in grapevine reveal DNA polymorphisms when analysed as sequence�tagged sites (STSs)// Theor. and Appl. Genet. – 1993. – 86. – P. 985–990. 23. Bowers J.E., Dangl G.S., Vignani R., Meredith C.P. Iso� lation and characterization of new polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) // Genome. – 1996. – 39. – P. 628–633. 24. Bowers J.E., Dangl G.S., Meredith C.P. Development ISSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 236 S. Goryslavets, V. Risovanna, R. Bacilieri, J.�F. Hausman, M. Heuertz and characterization of additional microsatellite DNA markers for grape // Amer. J. Enol. and Viticult. – 1999. – 50. – P. 243–246. 25. Sefc K.M., Regner F., Turetschek E., Gl?ssl J. Steinkellner H. Identification of microsatellite sequences in Vitis riparia and their applicability for genotyping of different Vitis species // Genome. – 1999. – 42. – P. 367–373. 26. Hardy O.J., Vekemans X. Spagedi: a versatile compute program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the indi� vidual or population levels // Mol. Ecol. Notes. – 2002. – 2. – P. 618–620. 27. Valière N. Gimlet: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data// Mol. Ecol. Notes. – 2002. – 2. – P. 377–379. 28. Lynch M., Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. – Sunderland : Sinauer Assoc., Inc., 1998. 29. Pemberton J.M., Slate J., Bancroft D.R., Barrett J.A. Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: a caution for parentage and population studies // Mol. Ecol. – 1995. – 4. – P. 249–252. Received 18.02.09 ІSSN 0564–3783. Цитология и генетика. 2010. № 2 37 A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape cultivars
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-66706
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 0564-3783
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-02T05:25:47Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Інститут клітинної біології та генетичної інженерії НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Goryslavets, S.
Risovanna, V.
Bacilieri, R.
Hausman, J.-F.
Heuertz, M.
2014-07-20T17:54:00Z
2014-07-20T17:54:00Z
2010
A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers / S. Goryslavets, V. Risovanna, R. Bacilieri, J.-F. Hausman, M. Heuertz // Цитология и генетика. — 2010. — Т. 44, № 2. — С. 29-37. — Бібліогр.: 29 назв. — англ.
0564-3783
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/66706
634.85:631.526.32:577.21(477)
Four bred grapevine varieties released for commercial cultivation in Ukraine, namely ‘Antey Magarachskii’, ‘Rubinovyi Magaracha’, ‘Granatovyi Magaracha’ and ‘Rubin Golodrigi’, and their putative parental forms were genotyped using six microsatellite loci.
Четыре селекционных сорта винограда Антей Магарачский, Рубиновый Магарача, Рубин Голодриги и Гранатовый Магарача, которые культивируются в Украине для приготовления сухих и крепленых вин, и их предполагаемые родительские формы были генотипированы с использованием шести микросателлитных локусов.
Чотири селекційних сорти винограду Антей Магарацький, Рубіновий Магарача, Рубін Голодриги та Гранатовий Магарача, що культивують в Україні для приготування сухих і десертних вин, та їх потенційні батьківські форми були генотиповані з використанням шести мікросателітних локусів.
We are grateful to Dr. V. Klimenko for valuable comments on issues referring to breeding, Dr. Amine Memetova, Ms. Valentina Petrashko and Mr. Sergey Makeiev for their help in collecting plant materials. We thank Dr. Didier Vares from INRA Vassal for providing cuttings of reference varieties, Dr. Patrice This for offer an opportunity to work in the Diversity and Genome laboratory from Centre INRA de Montpellier and Dr. Valerie Laukou from Centre INRA de Montpellier for consultations in microssatellite analysis and aleles standartization. This work was funded by the Luxembourg Ministry of Finance, by Bioversity International and by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of France (ECONET program).
en
Інститут клітинної біології та генетичної інженерії НАН України
Цитология и генетика
Оригинальные работы
A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers
Изучение родословной близкородственных украинских технических сортов винограда с использованием микросателлитных маркеров
Вивчення родоводу близькоспоріднених українських технічних сортів винограду з використанням мікросателітних маркерів
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers
Goryslavets, S.
Risovanna, V.
Bacilieri, R.
Hausman, J.-F.
Heuertz, M.
Оригинальные работы
title A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers
title_alt Изучение родословной близкородственных украинских технических сортов винограда с использованием микросателлитных маркеров
Вивчення родоводу близькоспоріднених українських технічних сортів винограду з використанням мікросателітних маркерів
title_full A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers
title_fullStr A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers
title_full_unstemmed A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers
title_short A parentage study of closely related Ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers
title_sort parentage study of closely related ukrainian wine grape varieties using microsatellite markers
topic Оригинальные работы
topic_facet Оригинальные работы
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/66706
work_keys_str_mv AT goryslavetss aparentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT risovannav aparentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT bacilierir aparentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT hausmanjf aparentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT heuertzm aparentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT goryslavetss izučenierodoslovnoiblizkorodstvennyhukrainskihtehničeskihsortovvinogradasispolʹzovaniemmikrosatellitnyhmarkerov
AT risovannav izučenierodoslovnoiblizkorodstvennyhukrainskihtehničeskihsortovvinogradasispolʹzovaniemmikrosatellitnyhmarkerov
AT bacilierir izučenierodoslovnoiblizkorodstvennyhukrainskihtehničeskihsortovvinogradasispolʹzovaniemmikrosatellitnyhmarkerov
AT hausmanjf izučenierodoslovnoiblizkorodstvennyhukrainskihtehničeskihsortovvinogradasispolʹzovaniemmikrosatellitnyhmarkerov
AT heuertzm izučenierodoslovnoiblizkorodstvennyhukrainskihtehničeskihsortovvinogradasispolʹzovaniemmikrosatellitnyhmarkerov
AT goryslavetss vivčennârodovodublizʹkosporídnenihukraínsʹkihtehníčnihsortívvinograduzvikoristannâmmíkrosatelítnihmarkerív
AT risovannav vivčennârodovodublizʹkosporídnenihukraínsʹkihtehníčnihsortívvinograduzvikoristannâmmíkrosatelítnihmarkerív
AT bacilierir vivčennârodovodublizʹkosporídnenihukraínsʹkihtehníčnihsortívvinograduzvikoristannâmmíkrosatelítnihmarkerív
AT hausmanjf vivčennârodovodublizʹkosporídnenihukraínsʹkihtehníčnihsortívvinograduzvikoristannâmmíkrosatelítnihmarkerív
AT heuertzm vivčennârodovodublizʹkosporídnenihukraínsʹkihtehníčnihsortívvinograduzvikoristannâmmíkrosatelítnihmarkerív
AT goryslavetss parentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT risovannav parentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT bacilierir parentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT hausmanjf parentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers
AT heuertzm parentagestudyofcloselyrelatedukrainianwinegrapevarietiesusingmicrosatellitemarkers