VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans

Results of the activity at VEPP-4M collider of the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics over the period of 2000-2001 and the near future plans are presented.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Datum:2001
1. Verfasser: Kiselev, V.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2001
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/78367
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans / V.А. Кiselev // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 5. — С. 3-5. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1860238976258932736
author Kiselev, V.A.
author_facet Kiselev, V.A.
citation_txt VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans / V.А. Кiselev // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 5. — С. 3-5. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description Results of the activity at VEPP-4M collider of the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics over the period of 2000-2001 and the near future plans are presented.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T18:27:23Z
format Article
fulltext VEPP-4M COLLIDER: CURRENT ACTIVITY AND FUTURE PLANS V.A. Kiselev1 (for the VEPP-4M team) Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Results of the activity at VEPP-4M collider of the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics over the period of 2000-2001 and the near future plans are presented. PACS number: 29.20.Dh 1 INTRODUCTION VEPP-4M is a single-ring e+e- collider intended for high-energy physics experiments, photo-nuclear study at the ROKK-1M facility and synchrotron radiation re- search [1, 2]. Maximum designed energy of VEPP-4M is around 6 GeV. An electron (or positron) beam con- sists of two bunches which are spaced at one-half of the ring circumference (183 m). The beams collide at zero crossing angle in the interaction point (IP) where the KEDR detector is located. Basically, VEPP-4M is intended to study physics of ϒ-meson and two-photon processes. However, because of the interest growing to the range of J/ψ and ψ′ physics, it was proposed to concentrate efforts in the low energy range E = 1.5 –1.8 GeV [3]. This energy range is unusual for our storage ring and additional in- vestigation has to be done to obtain optimal perfor- mance. Two possible ways to reach reasonable luminosity in J/ψ region under consideration: (i) redistribution of damping partition numbers with the help of the gradient wigglers (GWs) installed in the technical straight at places of non zero dispersion and (ii) introducing of a strong radiation damping by two 3-pole dipole wigglers (DWs) located on the opposite sides of the VEPP-4M experimental straight section. In the near future we plan to perform an experiment on measurement of the τ lepton mass in the vicinity of its production threshold (1.777 GeV) with a relative ac- curacy better than 10-4 using the method of the reso- nance depolarization for beam energy calibration [4]. Earlier, such a method was successfully used in mea- surements of the J/ψ and ψ′ mass at VEPP-4 [5]. 2 LUMINOSITY For VEPP-4 the peak luminosity at 5 GeV was about 5×1030 cm-2s-1. Now for VEPP-4M at the same energy we hope to reach 2×1031 cm-2s-1 with the existing optics. At low energy the luminosity reduces significantly (∝ E4) and different problems arise due to the low damping rates (1/τ ~ 10 s-1). VEPP-4M has relatively large horizontal dispersion at the IP, so the horizontal beam size here is mainly de- fined by the energy spread. The ratio between syn- chrotron and betatron horizontal beam size (monochromatization factor) is equal to λ = 1.8 in the nominal operation mode. However, at a low energy we can vary this parameter by the GWs, which can redis- tribute damping decrements between horizontal and lon- gitudinal planes. By changing the GWs strength and VEPP-4M lattice, we can vary λ within the rather wide range (from ~ 1 to 4). Analytical studies [6] shows that the beam-beam effects are most dangerous for λ ≈ 1. In this case all three degrees of freedom are coupled and synchro-betatron resonances become strong. On the contrary, when λ >> 1, the particle horizontal co-ordi- nate at the IP practically does not depend on the beta- tron motion and the beam behaviour becomes almost two-dimensional. The width of horizontal and coupled synchro-betatron resonances falls down with increasing λ (for the mere vertical and synchrotron resonances it is not the case). Additionally redistribution of the damping decre- ments by the GWs provides: • suppression of high-order non-linear resonances with increasing the horizontal betatron damping, • reduction of the horizontal betatron emittance (a dynamic aperture become larger in units of rms beam size). • reduction of the horizontal beam-beam parameter ξ x, since the total horizontal beam size at the IP in- creases. The latter allows increasing a bunch intensity keep- ing ξx constant. Experimental results show that for λ ≈ 3 the maximum bunch current obtained is around 2 mA that corresponds to ξx ≈ 0.02. For the nominal operation mode (λ ≈ 1.8) such current can not be reached because in this case ξx = 0.032 is well above the beam-beam lim- it. To study the method of the resonance depolarization and to check the KEDR detector acquisition system, a J/ ψ test run was performed in summer 2001. Fig. 1 shows luminosity obtained during this run while Fig. 2 shows the beam-beam parameter as a function of the bunch current. The maximum peak luminosity that was achieved L = 4.7×1029 cm-2s-1 corresponds to ξy = 0.037 (1×1 bunch mode with 2.2 mA per bunch). 1 vkiselev@inp.nsk.su ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2001. №5. Серия: Ядерно-физические исследования (39), с.3-5. 3 Fig. 1. Single bunch luminosity versus of beam cur- rent (DWs off). Fig. 2. Test run vertical beam-beam parameter cal- culated from luminosity data. Another way to improve the luminosity performance is using of the dipole wigglers (DWs) with the peak field H = 1.8 T, which allows one to increase the hori- zontal emittance by a factor of 4 at 1.5 GeV. Numerical simulations of the beam-beam interaction with the LIFETRACK code [7] shows that with the help of the DWs we can reach the single bunch luminosity L ≈ 1030 cm-2s-1 for 1.5 GeV (with beam-beam parame- ters ξx = 0.015 and ξy =0.03). The experimental data with the switching-on DWs correspond to L ≈ 0.7× 1030 cm-2s-1 (Ib = 3.2mA, ξy = 0.046) and the beam life- time τ = 1.3 hour. Experiments show that the maximum emittance increasing with DWs (4 times) is not optimal for the luminosity increasing. The reason as it is consid- ered now is the dynamic aperture limitation. 3 DYNAMIC APERTURE Study of the non-linear beam dynamics was already performed at VEPP-4M several years ago [8]. Since that time, the new final focus quadrupoles with improved gradient quality replaced two old ones. Besides, the working betatron tune point was moved from (8.62; 7.57) to (8.55; 7.60). These two factors yielded to sig- nificant increase of the horizontal border of stable mo- tion (twice). However, when two dipole wigglers are used to enlarge the beam phase volume, the horizontal aperture shrinks. At an energy of 1.5 GeV, two 1.8 T dipole wigglers provide strong distortion to the beam motion (especially vertical). At their maximum field the linear tune shift is ∆Qy ≈ 0.13 and ∆Qx ≈ 0.02 [9]. Linear wiggler effects, including the tune matching and the beta-function recovering (inside a 15% accura- cy), are completed by three pairs of quadrupoles in the experimental straight section. However, non-linear com- ponents of the wiggler field (mainly, strong chromatic sextupoles) together with the fringe field yield a signifi- cant reduction of the dynamic aperture (by approximate- ly 30%) as it is illustrated in Fig. 3 [10]. The vertical border of the aperture is limited by mechanical factors well below the dynamic aperture limitation and is not changed due to the wiggler switching-on. Fig. 3. VEPP-4M dynamic aperture. As the next step, study of non-linear components of the wiggler field is planning to be performed. The final goal is suppression of the DWs non-linearity by the use of octupoles and sextupoles magnets. 4 POLARIZATION AT VEPP-4 A measurement of the τ+τ‾ production cross section will be done by the detector KEDR in the energy region just above the threshold (1.78 GeV). To calibrate the beam energy, the polarized electron beams are injected in the storage ring VEPP-4M from a booster storage ring VEPP-3 (see Fig. 4). Radiation polarization of par- ticles in VEPP-3 occurs with the characteristic time τ p ≈ 40 minutes near to the τ threshold (for VEPP-4M τp ≈ 85 hours). Quantum fluctuation of radiation together with im- perfection of the magnetic field destroys the beam po- larization with the characteristic spin relaxation time τr. We assume the horizontal magnetic field produced by the vertically misaligned quadrupole magnets as a main factor of depolarization. Estimation shows that for the τ threshold energy region of 1.777 GeV and vertical COD of ~ 100 μm (rms), the spin decay time for VEPP-4M is equal to τr = 30 min [4]. A depolarization rate depends strongly on the spin resonance tune: τp/τr ∝ (νs-k)-4 (at E = 1.777 GeV we have νs = 4.032). This fact can limit the energy calibration time. 4 Fig. 4. A set up for the polarization experiments at VEPP-4M. Experimental set up for the depolarisation study at VEPP-4M includes 4 movable scintillation counters in- serted into the vacuum tube and two stripline electrodes and electronics (a frequency synthesiser, wide band am- plifier, etc.) to produce resonant spin depolarization. The counters detect the Touschek scattering electrons whose scattering rate depends on the particle spin. Two bunches with depolarised/polarized particles are used to measure the ratio 1-N2/N1 depending on the stripline electrodes signal frequency where N2 and N1 are count rates for the fist and second bunch. Time, sec 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 D el ta , % -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Chi2 / ndf = 6.841 / 9 0.4299 ±p0 = 2.337 1-N2/N1, % Chi2 / ndf = 6.841 / 9 0.4299 ±p0 = 2.337 0.4 %±-1.9 % Chi2/ ndf = 1.2/4 O N : 4 2 2. 12 0 - 4 2 2. 50 K H z depolarization 0.02 KHz± = 422.19 df O FF Fig. 5. Test run on the spin energy calibration. During a J/ψ test run (summer 2001), a method of the resonance depolarization was used to calibrate beam energy. Fig.5 shows typical “jump” in 1-N2/N1 due to the beam depolarization. The error of the beam energy definition obtained during the test run is ≈ 30 keV (∆ E/E ≈ 2×10-5). 5 FUTURE PLANS • Commissioning of the new polarimeter system at the VEPP-4M. • Measurement of the beam energy by the method of resonance depolarization with reasonable accuracy (∆E/E ≈ 1×10-5) in to the energy range between J/ψ and τ. • The KEDR run at J/ψ peak and in the vicinity of the threshold of τ - lepton production. REFERENCES 1. V.Anashin et al. // Proc.EPAC'98, Stockholm, 1998, v. 1, p. 400. 2. S.A.Nikitin // Proc. of Intern. Workshop e+e- Fac- tories’99, KEK, Japan, 1999, p. 37. 3. E.Levichev // Proc. HEACC-2000, Tsukuba, Japan, 2000. 4. V.E.Blinov et al. // Proc. PAC2001, Chicago, Illi- nois, USA, RPPH041. 5. A.A.Zolents, et al. // Phys. Lett. 1981, v. 96B, # 2, p. 214-216. 6. A.I.Gerasimov, et al. // Nucl. Inst. Meth. 1991, v. A305, p. 25. 7. D.Shatilov // Part. Acc. 1996, v. 52, p. 65. 8. V.Kiselev, E.Levichev, V.Sajaev, V.Smaluk // Nu- cl. Inst. Meth. 1998, v. A406, p. 356-370. 9. V.A.Kiselev, S.A.Nikitin, I.Ya.Protopopov // Proc. HEACC-98, Dubna, 1998, p. 103. 10. V.Kiselev, E.Levichev, A.Naumenkov // Proc. PAC2001, Chicago, Illinois, USA, TPPH004. ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2001. №5. Серия: Ядерно-физические исследования (39), с.3-5. 5
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-78367
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T18:27:23Z
publishDate 2001
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Kiselev, V.A.
2015-03-15T19:27:06Z
2015-03-15T19:27:06Z
2001
VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans / V.А. Кiselev // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 5. — С. 3-5. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ.
1562-6016
PACS: 29.20.Dh
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/78367
Results of the activity at VEPP-4M collider of the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics over the period of 2000-2001 and the near future plans are presented.
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans
Коллайдер VEPP-4M: состояние и планы на будущее
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans
Kiselev, V.A.
title VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans
title_alt Коллайдер VEPP-4M: состояние и планы на будущее
title_full VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans
title_fullStr VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans
title_full_unstemmed VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans
title_short VEPP-4M collider: Scurrent activity and future plans
title_sort vepp-4m collider: scurrent activity and future plans
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/78367
work_keys_str_mv AT kiselevva vepp4mcolliderscurrentactivityandfutureplans
AT kiselevva kollaidervepp4msostoânieiplanynabuduŝee