The Nobel prize centenary in physics

The report is dedicated to the discovery of X-rays and their revolutionary effect on the formation and development of modern physics.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Datum:2001
Hauptverfasser: Dovbnya, A.N., Shendrik, V.A., Shendrik, A.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2001
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/79225
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:The Nobel prize centenary in physics / A.N. Dovbnya, V.A. Shendrik, A.A. Shendrik // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 3. — С. 33-34. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1859655794665979904
author Dovbnya, A.N.
Shendrik, V.A.
Shendrik, A.A.
author_facet Dovbnya, A.N.
Shendrik, V.A.
Shendrik, A.A.
citation_txt The Nobel prize centenary in physics / A.N. Dovbnya, V.A. Shendrik, A.A. Shendrik // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 3. — С. 33-34. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description The report is dedicated to the discovery of X-rays and their revolutionary effect on the formation and development of modern physics.
first_indexed 2025-12-07T13:39:18Z
format Article
fulltext THE NOBEL PRIZE CENTENARY IN PHYSICS A.N. Dovbnya, V.A. Shendrik, A.A. Shendrik1 Scientific-Production Complex “Accelerator” National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology” 1, Akademicheskaya St., 61108 Kharkov, Ukraine 1 Secondary School, Valki, Kharkov Region, Ukraine The report is dedicated to the discovery of X-rays and their revolutionary effect on the formation and development of modern physics. PACS numbers: 01.90.+g, 01.65.+g On the 10th of 1901, in the Large Hall of the Acade- my of Music in Stockholm the Nobel Prize Committee awarded Roentgen with the first Nobel Prize in physics as a mark of gratitude of scientists and the mankind. Wilhelm Konrad Roentgen was born in a small Ger- man town of Lennepe not far off from the Germany- Netherlands frontier. He devoted all his life to physics. Having become Professor of Physics, Roentgen gave lectures on physics at a number of institutes in Ger- many. The physical experiment was in his element. Hardly anybody could be compared with him in thinking out the experiment, in the accuracy of measurements and in thoroughness of analyzing possible mistakes. Roentgen had already become famous among physicists of that time for his investigations in various areas. Thus, for example, in 1890, he was the first to prove by direct experiment that moving charges generate a magnetic field. At the end of the 19th century, W. Roentgen, Professor of the Wurzburg University in Germany, conducted experiments with electric discharge in gases. He used a glass tube having two electrodes soldered in it and pumped down to a pressure of about 10-5 of at- mospheric pressure. When a high voltage was applied to the electrodes, the glass about the anode started glowing with a yellow-green light. This glow was at- tributed by physicists to the action of the so-called cathode rays, the flux of which was emitted by the cathode, and was incident on the anode and, partially, on the tube walls. One November evening of 1895, when working in the laboratory, Roentgen hit upon an unusual phe- nomenon. For experiments, he wrapped the discharged tube with a black light-proof paper. It was dark in the room, and this allowed the scientist to notice that the barium salt crystals lying not far from the tube radiated a faint light. He deenergized the tube and the lumines- cence disappeared. Then Roentgen placed a barium salt- coated screen not far from the tube, and the screen start- ed glowing. The scientist began placing different objects between the tube and the screen. Cardboard, paper, ebonite plates exerted no effect on the brightness of the glow. Metal subjects cast a shadow on the screen. Evi- dently, the tube was a source of unknown penetrating rays, X rays, as Roentgen called them, or Roentgen rays as we now call them. The researcher put his hand in the path of X-rays, and a dark image of the hand skeleton appeared on the screen - soft tissues were transparent to the radiation, while the bones were nearly opaque to it. A unique talent of physicist-experimenter, excep- tional powers of observation, and a firm rule to attain clarity in everything permitted Roentgen to discover the phenomenon which had been for many years close by the scientists who made experiments using the same de- vices. However, the character of this new radiation re- mained enigmatic. Only one thing was clear, i.e., the ra- diation could not be identified with the cathode rays. Similarly to the cathode rays, it gave rise to fluores- cence, had a chemical action, propagated in straight lines, formed shadows. However, the X-rays did not have the characteristic properties of the cathode rays - they were not deflected by the magnetic field. Maybe they were of the same nature as the ultraviolet radiation was? But in that case they should be appreciably reflect- ed, refracted, polarized. Those were the questions (repeating an attempt to explain the nature of the rays), with which Roentgen finished his first work on X-rays, reported at the Physics Institute of the Wurzburg University in December, 1895. The first article of the scientist “About a new kind of rays”, where he described the properties of the radiation discovered by him, aroused an enormous interest throughout the world and was then published as a sepa- rate brochure in all European languages. The second work reported on 5 March, 1896, com- prised two new essential facts. The first was that under the action of X-rays the electrified bodies get dis- charged. It is not the X-rays themselves but the air pene- trated by them that acquires the property to discharge the electrified bodies. The second important fact men- tioned even in the first Roentgen′s work was that X-rays were produced with the cathode rays hitting not only the glass of discharge tubes, but also any substance, not ex- cluding liquids and gases. Depending on the character of substance struck by the cathode rays, the intensity of the resulting X-radiation turned out to be different. Those observations brought Roentgen as early as in February, 1896, to the development of the “focus” tube, where a concave aluminum mirror served as a cathode and a platinum plate placed at the centre of curvature of the mirror and inclined at 45° to the mirror axis served as an anode. Before the advent of thermionic devices, the “focus tubes were the only setups to produce X-rays for medical and physical investigations. Roentgen did much to quickly promote his discovery, having rejected ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2001. №3. Серия: Ядерно-физические исследования (38), с. 33-34. 33 with his characteristic disinterestedness any possibility of making a profit from it. The general interest much contributed to a rapid progress of X-ray engineering. It will suffice to give only one example to illustrate the path covered: in 1896 the radiography of a hand took a 20 min exposure, while now an instant is sufficient for the purpose. The physicists who held the viewpoint that X-rays were the electromagnetic radiation naturally tried to de- tect not the reflection but the diffraction on extremely narrow slits, as dictated by the supposed small value of X-ray wavelength. However, the man-made slits, no matter how narrow they were, appeared to be too rough. Besides, it was clear that it was difficult, if possible, to find the mechanical way of scribing rulings being well off at a distance of about a molecular size. In 1912, the German physicist M. Laue put forward a bold idea to use crystals as diffraction gratings for X-rays. In the same year, the theory was corroborated by experiments. In 1914, for the discovery of X-ray diffraction by crys- tals M. Laue was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics. And yet, Roentgen could not explain the nature of enigmatic rays. He did not know about the existence of electrons, and it was their slowing down in the tube glass that was the reason for the appearance of X-rays and a greenish visible light. When a charged particle comes flying into the substance, it slows down, loses its velocity and emits electromagnetic waves. The X-radia- tion wavelengths range from 5⋅10-8 to 5⋅10-12 m. On the scale of electromagnetic waves they take the place be- tween ultraviolet radiation and gamma-radiation. The beam of slowing down electrons emits waves of a wide diversity of wavelengths. These waves form a continu- ous X-ray spectrum. The wavelength which accounts for the maximum intensity of radiation should decrease as the electron velocity increases, i.e., as the tube voltage increases. Experiments have established the short wave- length boundary of the continuous X-ray spectrum λmin = 12390/U, where λmin is expressed in angstroms, and U - in volts. The existence of the short wavelength boundary di- rectly follows from the quantum nature of the radiation. Really, if the radiation arises at the expense of energy lost by the electron in its slowing down, then the quan- tum value ħω cannot exceed the electron energy eU: ħ ω ≤ eU. Hence it turns out that the radiation frequency cannot exceed ωmax = eU/ħ, and therefore, the wave- length cannot be smaller than λmin = 2πc/ωmax = = 2π ħc/eU. Thus we have arrived at the empirical relation given above. The ħ value found from these relations for the Planck constant is in good agreement with the val- ues calculated in other ways. Of all the methods of de- termining ħ the method based on the measurement of the sort wavelength boundary of the continuous X-ray spectrum is believed to be most exact. At a rather high electron velocity, apart from the continuous X-ray radiation (i.e., the radiation due to electron deceleration), the characteristic radiation is also excited (generated by excitation of inner electron shells of anticathode atoms). While the continuous X-radiation is independent of the anticathode material and is deter- mined only by the energy of electrons bombarding the anticathode, the characteristic radiation is specified by the nature of substance, from which the anticathode is made. As long as the electron energy is insufficient to excite the characteristic radiation, only continuous X- ray radiation arises. At a sufficiently high energy of bombarding electrons, sharp lines of the characteristic spectrum appear against the background of the continu- ous X-ray spectrum, the intensity of these lines being many times higher than that of the background. The characteristic X-rays were discovered in 1906 by the English physicist Ch. Barkla, and in 1917 he was also awarded with the Nobel prize in physics. In 1913, another English physicist H. Moseley established a sim- ple law relating the frequency of spectral lines from the characteristic X-ray radiation to the ordinal number of the emitting element (Moseley law). The dependence established by Moseley allows one to determine exactly the atomic number of the given element from the mea- sured wavelength of X-ray lines; it has played a great role in the arrangement of elements in the periodic sys- tem. W. Roentgen devoted his life to classical physics. But it was his discovery of “a new type of rays” that was the starting point for the development of new physics - physics of atom and atomic nucleus. In less than half a year after the discovery of X-rays, in an at- tempt to puzzle out their nature the radioactivity was discovered, and a year later the electron was found with their use. The discovery of X-rays had extremely important consequences for both scientific investigations and prac- tical applications in medicine and industry. It will not be an exaggeration to say that from this discovery new present-day physics begins. 34
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-79225
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1562-6016
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-07T13:39:18Z
publishDate 2001
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Dovbnya, A.N.
Shendrik, V.A.
Shendrik, A.A.
2015-03-30T06:36:05Z
2015-03-30T06:36:05Z
2001
The Nobel prize centenary in physics / A.N. Dovbnya, V.A. Shendrik, A.A. Shendrik // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 3. — С. 33-34. — англ.
1562-6016
PACS nambers: 01.90.+g, 01.65. +g
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/79225
The report is dedicated to the discovery of X-rays and their revolutionary effect on the formation and development of modern physics.
en
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
The Nobel prize centenary in physics
До сторіччя присудження першої Нобелівської премії з фізики
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle The Nobel prize centenary in physics
Dovbnya, A.N.
Shendrik, V.A.
Shendrik, A.A.
title The Nobel prize centenary in physics
title_alt До сторіччя присудження першої Нобелівської премії з фізики
title_full The Nobel prize centenary in physics
title_fullStr The Nobel prize centenary in physics
title_full_unstemmed The Nobel prize centenary in physics
title_short The Nobel prize centenary in physics
title_sort nobel prize centenary in physics
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/79225
work_keys_str_mv AT dovbnyaan thenobelprizecentenaryinphysics
AT shendrikva thenobelprizecentenaryinphysics
AT shendrikaa thenobelprizecentenaryinphysics
AT dovbnyaan dostoríččâprisudžennâperšoínobelívsʹkoípremíízfíziki
AT shendrikva dostoríččâprisudžennâperšoínobelívsʹkoípremíízfíziki
AT shendrikaa dostoríččâprisudžennâperšoínobelívsʹkoípremíízfíziki
AT dovbnyaan nobelprizecentenaryinphysics
AT shendrikva nobelprizecentenaryinphysics
AT shendrikaa nobelprizecentenaryinphysics