Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System

The concept of the Earth-atmosphere-ionosphere-magnetosphere (EAIM) system as a complex open dissipative nonlinear dynamical system whose most important property is trigger mechanisms for energy releases has been validated, the basic aspects of the system paradigm being stated. Highly energetic phen...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2008
Автори: Chernogor, L.F., Rozumenko, V.T.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Радіоастрономічний інститут НАН України 2008
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/8404
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System / L.F. Chernogor, V.T. Rozumenko // Радиофизика и радиоастрономия. — 2008. — Т. 13, № 2. — С. 120-137. — Бібліогр.: 24 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1859710320599105536
author Chernogor, L.F.
Rozumenko, V.T.
author_facet Chernogor, L.F.
Rozumenko, V.T.
citation_txt Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System / L.F. Chernogor, V.T. Rozumenko // Радиофизика и радиоастрономия. — 2008. — Т. 13, № 2. — С. 120-137. — Бібліогр.: 24 назв. — англ.
collection DSpace DC
description The concept of the Earth-atmosphere-ionosphere-magnetosphere (EAIM) system as a complex open dissipative nonlinear dynamical system whose most important property is trigger mechanisms for energy releases has been validated, the basic aspects of the system paradigm being stated. Highly energetic phenomena in the system have been shown to give rise to a complex cluster of processes and to the reconstruction in the subsystem coupling. The active experiments in the EAIM system have established the limitation of the linear description of the subsystem response to large energy inputs, determined the possibility of the onset of large-scale and global-scale perturbation from local and localized energy releases, as well as revealed and identified the types of waves transferring these disturbances. The majority of highly variable processes in the EAIM system have been determined to be accompanied by energetic particle precipitations from the magnetosphere at middle latitudes. Обоснована концепция о том, что система Земля – атмосфера – ионосфера – магнитосфера (ЗАИМ) является сложной открытой диссипативной нелинейной динамической системой, наиболее важным свойством которой являются тригерные механизмы высвобождения энергии. Сформулированы основные положения системной парадигмы. Показано, что высокоэнергичные явления в этой системе вызывают сложную совокупность процессов и перестройку взаимодействий подсистем. Активные эксперименты в системе ЗАИМ позволили установить предел линейного описания отклика подсистем на значительные энерговыделения, определить возможность возникновения крупномасштабных и глобальных возмущений от локальных и локализованных выделений энергии, а также выявить и идентифицировать типы волн, переносящих эти возмущения. Установлено, что бóльшая часть нестационарных процессов в системе ЗАИМ сопровождается среднеширотными высыпаниям Обгрунтовано концепцію про те, що система Земля – атмосфера – іоносфера – магнітосфера (ЗАІМ) є складною відкритою дисипативною нелінійною динамічною системою, найважливішою властивістю якої є тригерні механізми вивільнення енергії. Сформульовано основні положення системної парадигми. Показано, що високоенергійні явища у цій системі викликають складну сукупність процесів і перебудову взаємодій підсистем. Активні експерименти в системі ЗАІМ дозволили встановити межу лінійного опису відгуку підсистем на значні енерговиділення, визначити можливість виникнення великомасштабних і глобальних збурень від локальних та локалізованих виділень енергії, а також виявити та ідентифікувати типи хвиль, що переносять ці збурення. Встановлено, що більшість нестаціонарних процесів у системі ЗАІМ супроводжується середньоширотними висипаннями енергійних частинок з магнітосфери.
first_indexed 2025-12-01T05:03:43Z
format Article
fulltext Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2, с. 120-137 © L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko, 2008 Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko Kharkiv V. Karazin National University, 4, Svoboda Sq., Kharkiv, 61077, Ukraine E-mail: Leonid.F.Chernogor@univer.kharkov.ua Received November 13, 2007 The concept of the Earth-atmosphere-ionosphere-magnetosphere (EAIM) system as a complex open dissipative nonlinear dynamical system whose most important property is trigger mechanisms for energy releases has been validated, the basic aspects of the system paradigm being stated. Highly energetic phenomena in the system have been shown to give rise to a complex cluster of processes and to the reconstruction in the subsystem coupling. The active experiments in the EAIM system have established the limitation of the linear description of the subsystem response to large energy inputs, determined the possibility of the onset of large-scale and global-scale perturbation from local and localized energy releases, as well as revealed and identified the types of waves transferring these disturbances. The majority of highly variable processes in the EAIM system have been determined to be accompanied by energetic particle precipitations from the magnetosphere at middle latitudes. 1. Introduction A major achievement of the physics of the Earth, atmosphere, and geospace over the last quarter of the twentieth century has been the realization that a proper understanding of the processes acting in all spheres of our planet, and hence physics-based modeling, is impossible wi- thin the old paradigm where all spheres are con- sidered separately, and even when coupling bet- ween two spheres is accounted for, it is consi- dered to be linear. The instantaneous state of any sphere has turned out to be insufficient to predict its future evolution. Chernogor [1-4] have formulated and devel- oped the basics for the system paradigm in the 1980th. These papers present the validation of the concept that the Earth-atmosphere-iono- sphere-magnetosphere (EAIM) system is an open, dynamic, and, above all, nonlinear system with inherent non-trivial properties. Data on this system, distinct from data on a subsystem, per- mit more reliable forecasting of its state. The goal of this work is a formulation of the basic aspects of the system paradigm for the EAIM system and the discussion of the principle processes operating there. 2. The Basic Aspects of the System Paradigm (1) The Earth and the near-Earth environ- ment constitute a unified system. It consists of subsystems, internal and external spheres. This study is concerned with the tectonosphere, at- mosphere, ionosphere, and magnetosphere for- ming the TAIM system, and the ocean, atmo- sphere, ionosphere, and magnetosphere, for- ming the OAIM system, both of which form the EAIM system. The EAIM system has a hierar- chical structure. Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 121Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 (2) The EAIM system constituents interact via a myriad of various (direct, feedback, positive, negative, and in combination with each other) mechanisms, as illustrated in Figure 1. (3) The EAIM system is open. Emissions, matter, energy are supplied from above and be- low, which give rise to entropy production, as the data in Tables 1 and 2 show. (4) The EAIM system is dynamic. Its parame- ters vary in space and time. Consequently, the system is governed by partial differential equa- tions satisfying the initial and boundary conditions, which are known with finite errors. (5) The EAIM system is nonlinear, which is a consequence of the high-energy processes acting in it, as the data presented in Tables 3 and 4 illustrate, and the nonlinearities, in turn, drive in- stabilities, produce irregularities, generate intense waves, etc. (6) The Earth and its envelopes have the pro- perty of self-developing, complicating, and deve- loping self-organizing patterns owing to the influx of energy, emissions, mass, etc. 3. Processes Acting in the EAIM system 3.1. Geospace Storms Coronal mass ejections cause the most fun- damental rearrangement of processes opera- ting in the EAIM system, geospace storms, as depicted in Figure 1. The geospace storm is termed to be a set of storms including the magnetic, ionospheric, atmospheric, and elect- ric ones [1-3, 5-9]. The geospace storm could apparently be re- sponsible for the onset of high-energy proces- ses occurring in the troposphere, such as the hurricane, with a triggering factor of 9 10~ 10 10÷ [1-4]. The geospace storm characteristics are pre- sented in Table 5. The magnetic storm energy, ,mEΔ can be estimated in terms of disturbances in the geo- magnetic flux density, ,BΔ and can vary in a wide range of values, as illustrated in Table 6. The magnetic storm power, ,mP also depends on Fig. 1. Processes accompanying geospace storms and variations in space weather (AGW are acoustic-gravity waves) L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko 122 Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 both a mEΔ value and the duration tΔ of the storm’s main phase. We advance a new classification of geospace storms in terms of their constituent intensity, as presented in Table 7. 3.2. Seismic Processes An earthquake was the first high-energy source that caused a significant revision of ear- lier ideas about the role of energy fluxes from below. The energy and power of the most vio- Table 1. The energetics of fluxes from above Source PΠ (W/m2) Area (m2) P (W) Duration (s) Comments Solar emissions under Wavelength: quiet conditions: optical 1400 141.3 10⋅ 171.8 10⋅ Continuously 0.4 0.8 mλ ≈ ÷ μ ultraviolet – soft X-rays 2~ 2 10⋅ 141.3 10⋅ 16~ 3 10⋅ 1 180 nmλ ≈ ÷ hard X-rays 8~ 10− 141.3 10⋅ 6~ 10 0.1 1 nmλ ≈ ÷ Solar emissions under disturbed conditions: optical 1400 141.3 10⋅ 171.8 10⋅ 2~ 10 0.4 0.8 mλ ≈ ÷ μ ultraviolet – soft X-rays 2~ 2 10⋅ 141.3 10⋅ 16~ 3 10⋅ 2~ 10 1 180 nmλ ≈ ÷ hard X-ray 4~ 5 10−⋅ 141.3 10⋅ 10~ 6.5 10⋅ 2~ 10 0.1 1 nmλ ≈ ÷ Solar protons: Proton energy: 10 100 MeV÷ under quiet conditions 0.1 1610 1510 Continuously Flux: 11 9 2 110 10 m s− −÷ ⋅ under disturbed conditions 2 3÷ 1610 16(2 3) 10÷ ⋅ 2 510 10÷ Flux: 12 2 1(2 3) 10 m s− −÷ ⋅ ⋅ Solar wind: quiet 56 10−⋅ 1610 116 10⋅ 6 35 10 m ,pN −≈ ⋅ 400 km /sp ≈v disturbed 25 10−⋅ 1610 145 10⋅ 4(4 30) 10÷ ⋅ 8 310 m ,pN −≈ 1000 km /sp ≈v Galactic cosmic rays 610− 14~ 10 810 Continuously Flux: 4 2 110 m s− −⋅ Proton energy: 1 GeVpε = Meteoroid flux: Particle mass: background 75 10−⋅ 14~ 10 75 10⋅ Continuously 1010 kgm −≥ maximum flux 25 10−⋅ 14~ 10 12~ 5 10⋅ 3 410 10÷ Same as above Precipitating energetic particles: under quiet conditions 410− 13~ 10 910 2 410 10÷ High latitudes under disturbed conditions 1 13~ 10 13~ 10 2 410 10÷ Same as above Infrared thermospheric 2 10 mλ = ÷ μ emissions: Stronger at high latitudes under quiet conditions 3 210 10− −÷ 145 10⋅ 11(5 50) 10÷ ⋅ Continuously under disturbed conditions 0.1 1÷ 145 10⋅ 14(5 50) 10÷ ⋅ 2 410 10÷ Here, PΠ is the energy flux density, P is the power of processes Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 123Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 lent earthquakes can attain values of 19~ 10 J and 17~ 10 W, respectfully. Earthquakes exert their influence on the geospace environment via the following four channels: (1) acoustic-gravity waves, (2) qua- si-steady electric and magnetic fields, (3) elec- tromagnetic waves generated by variations in strain at boundaries between the mobile lithos- pheric plates, (4) MHD waves generated at altitudes of the dynamo region via the modula- tion of the current flows by the acoustic-gravity waves from earthquakes and via the modula- tion of the ionospheric electric field by the elec- tric field from earthquakes. Source PΠ (W/m2) Area (m2) P (W) Duration (s) Comments Earth’s surface Absorbed and radiated infrared emissions 24 10⋅ 145 10⋅ 172 10⋅ Continuously by the atmosphere Water vapor 80 145 10⋅ 164 10⋅ Same as above Latent heat released from atmospheric water vapor Air convection 30 145 10⋅ 161.5 10⋅ Same as above — Heat fluxes from the Earth’s interior 26 10−⋅ 145 10⋅ 133 10⋅ Same as above Plays negligible role Atmospheric turbulence 1 10÷ 145 10⋅ 14(5 50) 10÷ ⋅ Same as above Up to ~ 100 120 km÷ altitude Internal gravitational Effectively dissipated waves (IGW) 0.1 1÷ 145 10⋅ 13(5 50) 10÷ ⋅ Same as above in the thermosphere Tidal waves 310− 145 10⋅ 115 10⋅ Same as above Same as above Planetary waves 310− 145 10⋅ 115 10⋅ Same as above Same as above Infrasound 4 310 10− −÷ 145 10⋅ 10(5 50) 10÷ ⋅ Same as above Reach the ionospheric F region Infrasound from the Same as above strongest earthquake 2 310 10÷ 1110 13 1410 10÷ 210 Electromagnetic Reach the ionosphere emissions from and magnetosphere the strongest earthquake 3 210 10− −÷ 1110 8 910 10÷ 2 310 10÷ Acoustic emissions Dissipated from the most powerful in the atmosphere lightning discharge 310− 910 610 ~ 1 Electromagnetic Reach the ionosphere emissions from and magnetosphere the most powerful lightning discharge 310− 910 610 ~ 1 Acoustic emissions Dissipated from global in the atmosphere thunderstorm activity 310− 1210 910 Continuously Electromagnetic Reach the ionosphere emissions from global and magnetosphere thunderstorm activity 310− 1210 910 Same as above Table 2. The energetics of fluxes from below L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko 124 Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 The energetics of the fields of seismic origin is high, as the data in Table 8 show. Earthquakes are the cause of both the second- ary effects arising in the EAIM system and the manifestation of the coupling in the ionosphere- magnetosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere system recurring under the influence of energetic particles precipitating from the radiation belts, as the data in Table 9 illustrate [1, 4]. 3.3. Meteorological Processes General Information. A conjecture that pow- erful meteorological processes can influence the upper atmosphere has circulated for a long time; however, the convincing evidence has appeared only recently. The important role is played by cy- clones, specifically, by extratropical cyclones that occur almost continuously, and this means that their impact on the upper atmosphere may be regular. The tropical cyclone is distinct from that extratropical in a nonlinear coupling between the ocean and the troposphere. Most likely, the geomagnetic storm and tropi- cal cyclone occurrences show a statistical corre- lation. The tropical cyclone turns out to generate bi- polar changes of 10 to 20 mV/m in the electric field. Satellite measurements show that the dura- tion of this process is approximately 2 3÷ min with horizontal scales of 3(1 1.5) 10÷ ⋅ km. Chernogor [3, 10] has developed the basis for hydrodynamic, thermodynamic, and electro- magnetic field models of the tropical cyclone (Tables 10–12). The tropical cyclone, like other meteorological processes, is formed as a result of coupling among the constituents in the atmosphere-ocean-land (AOL) subsystem. This subsystem has an inhe- rent property of self-excitation. The initial eddy can be induced by a few mechanisms, such as an air current disturbance by a sharp discontinuity in the mainland landform, a meteorological front, or cumulus cloud development. The initial eddy Source Energy (J) Power (W) Impact duration (s) Comments Solar optical emissions 2210 1710 510 During 24 hours Solar wind 1710 1210 510 Same as above Meteorite 12 1510 10÷ 11 1510 10÷ 1 10÷ Affects the atmosphere Asteroid 15 2610 10÷ 18 263 10 10⋅ ÷ 30.3 10 1−⋅ ÷ Impacts the Earth The Tunguska event 165 10⋅ 165 10⋅ 1 — Lightning 10 1210 10÷ 10 1210 10÷ 1 — Global winds 2010 1510 510 During 24 hours Cyclone 19 2110 10÷ 13 152 10 2 10⋅ ÷ ⋅ 55 10⋅ — Hurricane 18 2010 10÷ 13 1510 10÷ 510 During 24 hours Tornado 11 1310 10÷ 8 1010 10÷ 310 — Volcano 20 2110 10÷ 15 1910 10÷ 2 510 10÷ — Earthquake 19 2110 10÷ 17 1810 10÷ 2 310 10÷ — Tsunami 18 2010 10÷ 16 1910 10÷ 210 10÷ — Forest fire 18 1910 10÷ 12 1410 10÷ 5 610 10÷ 1000 km2 area Heat flux from the Earth’s interior 183 10⋅ 133 10⋅ 510 During 24 hours Table 3. Parameters of natural processes in the EAIM system Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 125Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 1610 1210 410 210− Magnetic field energy 8 1010 10÷ 4 610 10÷ 4 510 10÷ 2 410 10÷ Electric field energy 1210 810 410 1± Thermal energy 5 710 10÷ 310 10÷ 4 510 10÷ 2 410 10÷ Electric field energy 15 1710 10÷ 11 1310 10÷ 4 510 10÷ 3 110 10− −÷ Thermal energy Table 5. Geospace storm energetics Geospace region Energy (J) Power (W) Duration (s) Relative variations in energy Comments Magnetosphere Ionosphere Thermosphere Table 4. Parameters of anthropogenic sources in the EAIM system Source Energy (J) Power(W) Impact duration (s) Comments Nuclear explosions: single 174 10⋅ 244 10⋅ 710− Equivalent of 100 Mt all ammunition 194 10⋅ 15 164 10 4 10⋅ ÷ ⋅ 3 410 10÷ Global nuclear conflict anti-asteroid perspective 18 214 10 4 10⋅ ÷ ⋅ 25 284 10 4 10⋅ ÷ ⋅ 710− Large surface explosion 11 1210 10÷ 14 1510 10÷ 310− Mass of 25 250 t÷ Nuclear plant accident 1810 13 1410 10÷ 4 510 10÷ Fuel mass of 100 t Large rocket explosion 1310 12 1410 10÷ 0.1 10÷ Fuel mass of 1000 t Rocket launch: large 1310 10 1110 10÷ 2 310 10÷ Same as above expected 14 1510 10÷ 11 1310 10÷ 2 310 10÷ Fuel mass of 4 510 10÷ t Orbital maneuvering system engine burn in space 7 910 10÷ 7 810 10÷ 1 10÷ — Nuclear power system for space probe 1410 910 510 During 24 hours Spacecraft descent: Mass: large 12 1310 10÷ 9 1110 10÷ 2 310 10÷ 100 t expected 14 1510 10÷ 11 1310 10÷ 2 310 10÷ 3 410 10÷ t Power transmission line 1510 1010 510 During 24 hours Radio system emissions 1210 710 510 Same as above Meteotron 12 1510 10÷ 9 1010 10÷ 3 510 10÷ — Power plant 14 1510 10÷ 9 1010 10÷ 510 Same as above Power plants worldwide 172 10⋅ 122 10⋅ 510 Same as above Global energy consumption 182 10⋅ 132 10⋅ 510 Same as above L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko 126 Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 Table 6. Magnetic storm parameter estimates 0 3< 1 14(1 1.5) 10÷ ⋅ 10(2.8 4.2) 10÷ ⋅ Ultra weak disturbance 1 3 5÷ 1 2÷ 14(1.5 2.5) 10÷ ⋅ 10(2.1 7) 10÷ ⋅ Extremely weak disturbance 2 5 10÷ 1 2÷ 14(2.5 5) 10÷ ⋅ 10(3.5 14) 10÷ ⋅ Very weak disturbance 3 10 20÷ 1 2÷ 15(0.5 1) 10÷ ⋅ 11(0.7 2.8) 10÷ ⋅ Weak storm 4 20 40÷ 1 2÷ 15(1 2) 10÷ ⋅ 11(1.4 5.6) 10÷ ⋅ Relatively moderate storm 5 40 70÷ 2 3÷ 15(2 5) 10÷ ⋅ 11(1.9 4.9) 10÷ ⋅ Moderate storm 6 70 120÷ 3 4÷ 15(3.5 6) 10÷ ⋅ 11(2.5 5.6) 10÷ ⋅ Strong storm 7 120 200÷ 4 5÷ 16(0.6 1) 10÷ ⋅ 11(3.4 7.7) 10÷ ⋅ Very strong storm 8 200 330÷ 5 10÷ 16(1 1.7) 10÷ ⋅ 11(2.8 9.5) 10÷ ⋅ Ultra strong storm 9 330 500÷ 6 12÷ 16(1.7 2.5) 10÷ ⋅ 12(0.4 1.2) 10÷ ⋅ Super strong storm К index (nT)BΔ (h)tΔ (J)mEΔ (W)mP Qualitative disturbance/storm description Table 7. The characterization of geospace storm components: a magnetic storm (MS), an ionospheric storm (IS), an atmospheric (thermospheric) storm (AS), an electrical storm (ES), the main ionospheric trough (MIT), a traveling ionospheric disturbance (TID). Here, 2mN F is the 2F -layer peak electron density The transformation of a negative IS at high latitudes into the posi- tive phase in the mid- latitude daytime sector. Storm intensity Examples Ionospheric storm effects Causes Mechanism Intensive MS Intensive IS Intensive AS Intensive ES September 25, 1998, May 29-30, 2003, and November 7-10, 2004 storms A decrease in NmF2 by a factor of 4 7÷ times. Night- time plasma heating up to 2400 3200 K.÷ An uplifting of the F2 region by 100 300÷ km. A decrease in the relative hy- drogen ion density (H )N Ne+ down to 10 times with the sub- sequent recovery. The effects of magnetospheric electric fields penetrating to middle latitudes. The auroral oval, MIT, light ion trough, and au- roral hot spot expansion to middle latitudes, the emptying of magnetic flux tubes. Magnetospheric substorms. Reconnection between interplanetary and magnetospheric field lines. Deformation of the magnetosphere. Energetic particle pre- cipitation from the magnetosphere. Moderate MS Intensive IS Intensive AS Intensive ES March 20-21, 2003 storm A decrease in NmF2 down to 5 times, associated with an in- crease in eT during sunlit hours up to 2700 3300÷ K in the 300 500÷ km altitude range. An uplifting of the F- layer peak altitude more than by 100 km during the night. The effects of TIDs and mag- netospheric electric fields pen- etrating to middle latitudes. A change in the storm phase due to the desta- bilizing electric field pulse associated with the change in the sign of the IMF yE component from east to west and with the TIDs generated by mag- netospheric substorms. Magnetospheric sub- storms associated with the generation of TIDs and nonstationary dis- turbances in the mag- netospheric electric fields. Intensive MS Moderate IS Moderate AS Weak ES April 17, 2002 storm An increase in NmF2 of 15 %. An uplifting of the F2 region by ~50 km. The plasma tem- perature does not change. The rearrangement of the global thermospheric cir- culation and neutral con- stituent redistribution due to high latitude atmo- spheric heating. Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 127Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 Table 8. Enegetics charecterizing the fields of seismic origin Field Energy (J) Power (W) Duration (s) Comments Electromagnetic: 10 Hzf ≤ 10 1110 10÷ 810 2 310 10÷ Reach the ionosphere and magnetosphere 3 410 10 Hzf = ÷ 13 1410 10÷ 1110 2 310 10÷ Same as above 5 610 10 Hzf = ÷ 15 1610 10÷ 1310 2 310 10÷ Rapidly decay in the lithosphere Electric 910 4 610 10÷ 3 510 10÷ Reach the ionosphere Magnetic 1010 810 210 Same as above Infrasound 15 1610 10÷ 13 1410 10÷ 210 Reach ~300 km altitude AGW 15 1610 10÷ 11 1210 10÷ 3 410 10÷ Same as above Here, N is the electron density, NΔ is an enhancement in the electron density, q is the electron-ion production rate, qΔ is an enhancement in the electron-ion production rate, pΠ is a precipitation energy rate, Π is an energetic particle flux, ε is precipitating particle energy. Table 9. The parameters of precipitating energetic particle fluxes and the produced ionization as estimated from MF radar electron density measurements Magnetic June 15, Electrons 55 60÷ 810 83 10⋅ 510 515 10⋅ 61.8 10−⋅ 72.3 10⋅ 500 storm 1983 (protons) 5(7.8 10 )⋅ (15000) Magnetic May 15, Electrons 84 91.2 10⋅ 90.5 10⋅ 71.4 10⋅ 71.5 10⋅ 61.5 10−⋅ 83.8 10⋅ 60 storm 1997 Proton February 25, Electrons 72.5 910 95 10⋅ 710 735 10⋅ 53.5 10−⋅ 91.6 10⋅ 150 flare 1991 (protons) 7(1.2 10 )⋅ (20000) Dusk May 24, Electrons 80 910 910 710 73 10⋅ 63.4 10−⋅ 82.7 10⋅ 80 terminator 1997 Dawn May 25, Electrons 80 88 10⋅ 86 10⋅ 66.4 10⋅ 71.3 10⋅ 62.2 10−⋅ 81.7 10⋅ 80 terminator 1997 Midnight May 25, Electrons 90 — 83 10⋅ — 53 10⋅ 83 10−⋅ 65 10⋅ 40 1997 Solar August 11, Electrons 84 83 10⋅ 85 10⋅ 59 10⋅ 555 10⋅ 73.1 10−⋅ 73.2 10⋅ 60 eclipse 1999 Earthquake August 24, Electrons 84 85 10⋅ 84 10⋅ 62.5 10⋅ 65.6 10⋅ 76.3 10−⋅ 76.6 10⋅ 60 1999 Rocket May 15, Electrons 80 910 910 63 10⋅ 69 10⋅ 610− 82 10⋅ 80 launch 1987 High- March 1, Electrons 88 94 10⋅ 93 10⋅ 71.3 10⋅ 72.7 10⋅ 62.7 10−⋅ 84.5 10⋅ 40 power 1991 HF radio emissions Event Date Particles Altitude N NΔ q qΔ pΠ Π ε (km) 3(m )− 3(m )− 3 1(m s )− −⋅ 3 1(m s )− −⋅ 2(W m ) 2 1(m s )− −⋅ (keV) L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko 128 Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 Table 10. Hydrodynamic model for the tropical cyclone Here, v0 is the tangential component of the air velocity at the tropical cyclone internal boundary of radius 0,r 0u is the radial speed, 0V is the horizontal velocity component, 0w the vertical velocity component at a range of 0r from the cyclone center, 1v is the forward speed, 0r is the inner boundary radius, 0R is the outer boundary radius, m is the moving air mass, kE is the tropical cyclone kinetic energy, 0( )p rΔ is an air pressure deficit. 15 4.8 15.8 1.8 3 10 400 5 25.6 10−⋅ 7.7 20 6.4 21 4.8 4 10 425 5.7 11.1 10−⋅ 13.6 25 8 26.3 10.8 5 11 450 6.4 11.9 10−⋅ 21.3 30 9.6 31.5 19.2 6 11 475 7.1 13.2 10−⋅ 30.6 35 11.2 36.8 28 7 12 500 7.9 14.8 10−⋅ 41.7 40 12.8 42 36 8 13 530 8.8 17 10−⋅ 54.4 50 16 52.5 42 10 14 570 10.2 1.3 85 60 19.2 63 47 12 15 610 11.7 2.1 122 70 22.4 73.5 52 14 16 650 13.3 3.3 167 80 25.6 84 53 16 18 700 15.4 4.9 218 90 28.8 94.5 53 18 20 750 17.7 7 275 v0 0u 0V 0w 1v 0r 0R m kE 0( )p rΔ (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (cm/s) (m/s) (km) (km) 15(10 kg) 18(10 J) (hPa) Table 11. Thermodynamic model for the tropical cyclone Here, v0 is the tangential velocity component, 1TΔ is the water layer cooling, 1h is the cooled water layer thickness, 1TP is the thermal power lost by the ocean, fP is the power transferred by the cyclone to the ocean, 1f TP P is the energy transfer coefficient, sτ is the characteristic time constant for cyclone development, cP is the power of the latent heat yield, 2tΔ is an increase in the air temperature, 2TP is the power needed for water evaporation. 15 1 20 12.6 10−⋅ 31.7 10−⋅ 3.4 6.6 22.5 10−⋅ 12.1 23.3 10−⋅ 20 1.3 30 0.8 34.6 10−⋅ 3.6 4.2 27.2 10−⋅ 12.6 29.6 10−⋅ 25 1.5 50 1.8 210− 3.4 4 11.8 10−⋅ 12.2 12.4 10−⋅ 30 2 60 3.7 21.9 10−⋅ 3.4 3.4 13.6 10−⋅ 12.7 0.5 35 2.1 70 5.6 23.4 10−⋅ 3.4 2.8 15.6 10−⋅ 12.5 17.5 10−⋅ 40 2.4 80 8.4 25.6 10−⋅ 2.4 2.4 18.5 10−⋅ 12.2 1.1 50 2.4 80 9.6 11.3 10−⋅ 3 2 1.1 12.2 1.6 60 2.4 80 15.2 12.5 10−⋅ 2.8 1.6 1.5 12.2 2 70 2.5 80 19.2 14.6 10−⋅ 2.8 1.4 1.9 12.2 2.5 80 2.5 80 23.4 17.9 10−⋅ 3 1.1 2.3 11.8 3.7 90 2.5 85 30.1 1.3 3.2 1 2.7 11.6 5 v0 1TΔ 1h 1TP fP 1f TP P sτ cP 2tΔ 2TP (m/s) (K) (m) 14(10 W) 14(10 W) (%) (24 h) 14(10 W) ( C)° 14(10 W) Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 129Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 is further strengthened when cool air runs over the warm oceanic surface, which temperature is higher than the critical value of 26.5 C,Ct ≈ ° and the oceanic upper layer of 10 100÷ m thickness transfers its heat to the evolving eddy. The heat causes evaporation of the oceanic water, warms the air, and increases the eddy kinetic energy. When the water temperature, 1,t becomes less than the air temperature, the air begins to warm the oceanic surface layer, and thus a nonlinear decaying oscil- latory (in some cases, aperiodic) process arises. The tropical cyclone speed increases owing to the heat transferred from the oceanic surface layer water, and it decreases as a result of the air fric- tion against the oceanic surface. It is important that the frictional force is proportional to the eddy air velocity squared, 2.v To compensate for a horizontal divergence of the flow in the surface layer caused by winds, the upwelling of subsurface cold water occurs. The sea surface temperature, ,ft is determined by solar heating, and usually 27 30 Cft = ÷ ° when tropical cyclones occur. The layer water- cooling rate is controlled by the eddy frictional force, which is proportional to 2.v Thus, the heat balance equation for the oceanic surface layer and the balance equation for the eddy ki- netic energy are nonlinear [3, 10]. This means that both the AOL system and the processes acting in it are nonlinear. The temperature in the cyclone at the air-earth boundary increases by 10 K.TΔ ≈ AGW Channel. The heating and eddy motion occurring in the tropical cyclone generate internal gravity waves that break in the upper atmosphere and heat it. The predominant components in the internal gravity wave spectrum occur at two fre- quencies, 1Ω and 2 ,Ω one is the Brunt-Vaisala frequency 1 BΩ = ω and the other is 2 0 010V RΩ ≈ where 0V is the tangential component of the air velocity at the tropical cyclone internal boun- dary of radius 0.r In addition, the oceanic waves Table 12. Electrical and magnetic parameters of the tropical cyclone Here, eE is the electric field intensity in the cloud, e eF QE= is the electric force per unit volume, 0 0( )pF p r r= Δ is the pressure-gradient force, 02kF = ρwv is the Coriolis force per unit volume, 2 0 2cF = ρv is the centrifugal force per unit volume, Q is the electric charge density, 0w is the cyclone vertical velocity component, aj is the atmospheric electric current density, Q is the charge separation rate, 0v is the tangential component of the air velocity at the tropical cyclone internal boundary, 0r is the radius of the tropical cyclone internal boundary, 0( )p rΔ is an air pressure deficit, 0R is the outer radius of the cyclone, 0( )B RΔ is the changes in the magnetic field at a range of 0.R 3(C/ m )Q 1010− 910− 810− 710− 610− 510− 410− 0 (m /s)w 23 10−⋅ 24 10−⋅ 25 10−⋅ 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 2(A / m )aj 123 10−⋅ 114 10−⋅ 105 10−⋅ 810− 72 10−⋅ 63 10−⋅ 45 10−⋅ 3(A / m )Q 163 10−⋅ 154 10−⋅ 145 10−⋅ 1210− 112 10−⋅ 103 10−⋅ 85 10−⋅ (V / m)eE 510 52 10⋅ 54 10⋅ 56 10⋅ 58 10⋅ 610 62 10⋅ 3(N / m )eF 510− 42 10−⋅ ` 34 10−⋅ 26 10−⋅ 0.8 10 22 10⋅ 3(N / m )pF 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.4 3(N / m )kF 32 10−⋅ 34 10−⋅ 37 10−⋅ 38 10−⋅ 39 10−⋅ 210− 21.2 10−⋅ 3(N / m )cF 23 10−⋅ 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0 (m /s)v 15 30 50 60 70 80 90 0 (km)r 10 11 14 15 16 18 20 0( ) (kPa)p rΔ 0.8 3 9 12 17 22 28 0 (km)R 400 450 570 610 650 700 750 0( ) (nT)B RΔ 48 10−⋅ 21.1 10−⋅ 0.2 3.8 82 31.3 10⋅ 42.4 10⋅ L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko 130 Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 associated with the tropical cyclone are a po- werful source of infrasound. The maximum in the infrasound spectrum occurs at a frequency of 1 2 2 02(2) (3 )g VΩ = π where 9.8g ≈ m/s2. The calculations of IGW and infrasound para- meters are presented in Tables 13 and 14. As the IGW propagate upwards, their effect on the atmosphere evolves. At altitudes of less than 0 ~ 100z z< km, they only modulate neutral air and plasma parameters, while at 0z z> non- linear dissipation adds, and consequently neutral air heating occurs. Moreover, the air tempera- ture turns out to be modulated at the double (in the first approximation) frequency. The addition- al heating and modulation in turn cause changes and modulation in such a plasma parameter as the conductivity tensor (depending on the tem- perature), and consequently variations in the dynamo electric current arising owing to the neu- tral air drag on the charge particle. The 10 100 %÷ variation in the upper atmospheric temperature results in tens of percent disturbances in the ion- ospheric conductivity tensor components, and con- sequently in the integral ionospheric current giv- ing rise to the geomagnetic effect of internal gravity waves. Chernogor [3, 10] has obtained the following relation for estimating the ampli- tude of the geomagnetic field disturbance at a frequency of 2Ω: 0 02 B IΩ θΔ ≈ μ Ωτ m T where 0μ is the permeability of free space. During sunlit hours, the amplitude of the distur- bance lies in the range 1.3 13BΩΔ ≈ ÷ nT, if 0.1 1,T Tθ = Δ = ÷m 310−Ω = s–1, the gas relaxa- tion time constant 410τ =T s, and the undisturbed integral current 0 0.2I = A/m. Measurements show the magnitudes of BΩΔ close to these values. The nighttime values of 0I and BΩΔ are an order of magnitude smaller. The physical mechanism for the impact of infrasound on the upper atmosphere is similar to that for the IGW effects. The upper atmo- spheric responses to these impacts are also simi- lar, and the differences lie in the values of the predominant periods in the spectrum of geo- magnetic field variations. The infrasound ef- fects are associated with geomagnetic pulsa- tion enhancements in the unity to tenths second period range. The effect is clearly pronounced Table 13. Parameters of IGW launched by the tropical cyclone Here, 0v is the tangential velocity component, 0( )mp Rδ is the rms amplitude of the pressure in the IGW, 0( )Rwv is the particle velocity in the IGW, rΠ is the energy flux density in the IGW, rP is the power of IGW emission, rS is the surface area of IGW emission. 0(m/s)v 0( ) (Pa)mp Rδ 0( ) (mm /s)Rwv 2(W / m )rΠ (TW)rP 12 2(10 m )rS 15 21.6 10−⋅ 23.6 10−⋅ 75.7 10−⋅ 72.9 10−⋅ 0.5 20 25.1 10−⋅ 11.2 10−⋅ 65.9 10−⋅ 63.4 10−⋅ 0.57 25 11.3 10−⋅ 12.9 10−⋅ 53.8 10−⋅ 52.4 10−⋅ 0.64 30 12.7 10−⋅ 16.1 10−⋅ 41.6 10−⋅ 41.1 10−⋅ 0.71 35 0.5 1.1 45.7 10−⋅ 44.5 10−⋅ 0.79 40 0.8 1.9 31.6 10−⋅ 31.4 10−⋅ 0.88 50 2.1 4.7 39.5 10−⋅ 39.5 10−⋅ 1 60 4.3 9.7 24 10−⋅ 24.5 10−⋅ 1.12 70 7.7 17.4 11.3 10−⋅ 11.7 10−⋅ 1.33 80 12.9 29.2 13.8 10−⋅ 15.8 10−⋅ 1.54 90 19.6 44.3 0.9 1.6 1.77 Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 131Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 only at the principal infrasound frequencies of 0.1 1.0Ω ≈ ÷ s–1 with ~ 0.1 1BΔ ÷ nT in the daytime. Electromagnetic Emission Generation. Tro- pical Cyclone Impacts on the Magnetosphere and the Radiation Belts. The tropical cyclone evolution is generally accompanied by thunder- storms, thus resulting in generation of electro- magnetic emissions in a wide range of frequen- cies ( 100fΔ ≤ kHz). Rocket and satellite mea- surements support this concept. The energy and power of the strongest lightning discharges at- tain values of 10 GJ and 10 GW, respectively. During a tropical cyclone lifetime, the total num- ber of lightning discharges reaches 3 410 10 ,÷ which total energy and power yield attains 210 TJ and 210 TW, respectively. Approximately 310− of the lightning energy is converted into the acoustic disturbances and 4 310 10− −÷ into the electromagnetic disturbances, and consequently a total of 410 lightning discharges amounts to approximately 100 GJ acoustic energy and 10 100÷ GJ electromagnetic energy. For a tro- pical cyclone lifetime of 6 days, the average acoustic emission power amounts to 200 kW and electromagnetic to 20 200÷ kW. The acoustic and electromagnetic energy flux- es reaching the upper atmosphere appreciably change its parameters in the ~ 50 100÷ km al- titude range. Moreover, the VLF emissions prop- agating along geomagnetic field lines into the magnetosphere filled with the energetic parti- cles drive the electromagnetic electron and ion cyclotron instabilities resulting in pitch angle scat- tering of the energetic particles via wave-par- ticle interaction and consequently in the mag- netospheric energetic particle precipitation into the upper atmosphere. The equations gover- ning VLF or Alfven emission flux variations and the total content of energetic particles in the geomagnetic flux tube containing the wave source are nonlinear [1, 3]. The VLF radio waves cause precipitation of the energetic electrons, and the Alfven waves cause precipitation of the energetic ions, both of which produce additional ionization in the Table 14. The main parameters of acoustic emissions from oceanic waves Here, 0v is the tangential velocity component, mf is the maximum infrasound emission frequency, mT is the maximum infrasound emission period, 0aΠ is the infrasound energy flux density, apδ is the infrasound wave amplitude, wv is the particle velocity in the wave, aS is the surface area of the acoustic source, aP is the power of acoustic emission. 0 (m / s)v (mHz)mf (s)mT 2 0 (W/m )aΠ (Pa)apδ (m /s)wv 9 2(10 m )aS (W)aP 10 147 6.8 73.7 10−⋅ 21.3 10−⋅ 52.9 10−⋅ 0.7 22.6 10⋅ 15 98 10.2 69.2 10−⋅ 26.4 10−⋅ 41.4 10−⋅ 0.7 36.5 10⋅ 20 74 13.6 59.2 10−⋅ 0.2 44.5 10−⋅ 0.7 46.5 10⋅ 25 59 17 45.5 10−⋅ 0.5 31.1 10−⋅ 0.85 54.7 10⋅ 30 49 20.4 32.4 10−⋅ 1 32.3 10−⋅ 0.85 62 10⋅ 35 42 23.8 38.1 10−⋅ 1.9 34.3 10−⋅ 1 68.1 10⋅ 40 37 27.2 22.4 10−⋅ 3.3 37.5 10−⋅ 1.2 72.9 10⋅ 50 29 34 0.14 7.9 21.8 10−⋅ 1.4 82 10⋅ 60 25 40.8 0.6 16.3 23.7 10−⋅ 1.6 89.6 10⋅ 70 21 47.6 2.1 30.4 26.9 10−⋅ 1.8 93.8 10⋅ 80 18 54.4 6 51.4 0.12 2.3 101.4 10⋅ 90 16 61.2 15.5 82.7 0.19 2.8 104.3 10⋅ L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko 132 Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 upper atmosphere and modulate the atmospheric electric current flow, which, in turn, produce low-frequency emissions. Consequently, the above-mentioned secondary processes occur. In this way, cyclones affect the magnetosphere and the radiation belts, and the magnetosphere and the radiation belts produce feedback on the lower regions of the near-Earth space environ- ment. Quasi-Steady Electric Field Generation. Impacts on the Magnetosphere and the Ra- diation Belts. The marine aerosol plays a key role in the generation of the quasi-steady elec- tric field. A few mechanisms are suggested for this aerosol formation. The largest aerosol ( 1ad > μm in diameter) originate from drop- lets spraying and drying at the wind velocity of 7V > m/s and from water trickles ejected from breaking bubbles. Under quiet conditions, the aerosol number an and mass aρ densities do not exceed 45 10⋅ m–3 and 115 10−⋅ kg/m3, re- spectively. The smaller aerosol ( 1ad < μm in diameter) is mainly formed at the moment when the envelope of the surfacing bubble with an excessive vapor pressure is bursting. Another way of aerosol forming in this diameter range is the shrinking of the broken bubble envelope. The maximum in the size distribution function for this aerosol occurs at 0.1ad > μm, and 8(3 5) 10an ≈ ÷ ⋅ m–3 and 10(3 5) 10a −ρ ≈ ÷ ⋅ kg/m3 under quiet conditions. The strong wind within the cyclone facilitates the more intensive forma- tion of aerosol, its electrification, charge separa- tion, etc. When 35V = m/s, the 1110an ≈ m–3 and 610a −ρ ≈ kg/m3 values are attained. In the developed cyclone, the aerosol forma- tion is appreciably activated. The principal mechanism for aerosol forma- tion within the tropical cyclone is droplet spraying. The effect of the ascending air currents in the cyclone is to transport the positively charged aero- sols upwards, while the larger drops charged negatively move downward. As a result, the at- mospheric electric current density, ,aj signifi- cantly increases, and an increase in precipitation results in a significant increase in .aj During heavy showers usually associated with tropical cyclones, the aj value can attain 810− A/m2 or even 710− A/m2, while under quiet conditions 12 0 3 10aj −≈ ⋅ A/m2. At the wind vertical compo- nent of ,w the electric charge density is given by 71.7 10aQ j −= = ⋅w C/m3 and the charge separation rate 1110a aQ j H −= ≈ A/m3 where the dot over the letter designates the derivative taken with respect to time, and aH is a cloud thickness usually equal to 10 km. These values are the upper bound, while the more probable values are 9 8 0 3 10 3 10aj − −≈ ⋅ ÷ ⋅ A/m2 and 13 1210 10a aQ j H − −= ≈ ÷ A/m3. It is important that 3 4 0 10 10a aj j ≈ ÷ even in the latter case. The appearance of the strong electric current results in the generation of a quasi-steady electric field in the upper atmosphere, ionosphere, and the magnetosphere [3, 10]. To evaluate the electric field generated by the cyclone in the ionosphere, the following relation has been obtained: 0 0 0 a i i jE E j σ= σ where 610i −σ ≈ S/m is the conductance of the plas- ma at the ionospheric lower bound, 0 150E ≈ V/m is the electric field intensity at the water sur- face, and 0σ is the air conductance at the water surface. Inserting the aj estimate obtained above into this relation yields 3 30iE ≈ ÷ mV/m, which exceeds the background electric field in the ionosphere by 1 2÷ orders of magnitude. Besides, the maximum in this field occurs not strictly above the cyclone, but some distance away from it. The shift occurs because this disturbance maps from the dynamo region alti- tudes ( 100 150z ≈ ÷ km) to higher altitudes along magnetic field lines, and its value attains 600 800÷ km, which is of the same order of magnitude as cyclone dimensions [3, 10]. This electric field mapping into the magneto- sphere along magnetic field lines occurs with- out significant attenuation and, under some con- ditions, acts to decrease the charged particle trans- verse energy by ieE L⊥ ⊥ε = where L⊥ is the hori- zontal scale of the electric field disturbance. Set- Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 133Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 ting 02 1000L R⊥ = ≈ km gives 5 50⊥ε ≈ ÷ keV. These ⊥ε values are sufficient to cause particle pitch angle scattering, the precipitation of a frac- tion of radiation belt particles into the upper atmo- sphere, and the onset of the secondary processes mentioned above. Enhancements in the atmospheric electric currents over the cyclone act to produce varia- tions in the geomagnetic field. Estimates of the changes in the magnetic field at a range of R can be provided by the well-known relation 0 . 2 aIB R Δ = μ π Here, 0a aI j S= where 2 0 0 ,S R= π 0R is the outer radius of the cyclone. The 0( )B RΔ estimates are presented in Table 12 where eE is the electric field in the cloud, e eF QE= is the electric force per unit volume, 0 0( )pF p r r= Δ is the pressure- gradient force, 02kF = ρwv is the Coriolis force per unit volume, 2 0 2cF = ρv is the centrifugal force per unit volume, 0w is the cyclone vertical velocity component at a range of 0r from its cen- ter, aj is the atmospheric electric current density, Q is the rate of change of charge per unit volume in the cyclone. 3.4. Solar Eclipses Solar eclipses also belong to high-energy pro- cesses occurring in the atmosphere and geospace and acting to reconstruct EAIM subsystems cou- pling [11]. 3.5. Subsystem Coupling The subsystems in the EAIM system are strongly coupled via (1) waves of various origin, which modulate the parameters of the medium and transform one into the other, (2) quasi-steady electromagnetic fields, (3) particle fluxes from the ionosphere into the plasmasphere and vice versa, (4) energetic particles precipitating from the mag- netosphere (see Table 9). The wave disturbances play a prominent role in the system paradigm for the investigation of the EAIM system [12-17]. The wave disturbances not only transport energy and momentum, but they also indicate their state and variations in space (and tropospheric) weather. The list of wave types and their parameters are presented in Table 15 [1, 4]. Particle Precipitation. Our theoretical and experimental results indicate that energetic elec- tron precipitation at middle latitudes accompany the majority of highly variable processes occur- ring in the EAIM system [1-4, 12, 18], and the electron fluxes attain values of 7 910 10÷ m–2s–1. The mechanisms for the precipitation of particles have been validated, and they include the dece- leration of the energetic electrons in an ionospheric- magnetospheric quasi-static electric field and the transfer of their energy to VLF noise. Active Experiments proved to be a conve- nient way of studying both the EAIM system as a whole and its subsystem coupling. They permit the choice to be made of the energy yield, the location, and the time of the energy release, which is impossible to achieve when studying the nat- urally occurring processes in the EAIM system [1-4, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20]. Military Operations are accompanied by sig- nificant energy yields, similar to those during ac- tive experiments [4, 21]. The modern regional wars and conflicts, be- ing non-nuclear, employ ammunition powerful enough to be an important tool for remotely studying the near-Earth environment [4, 21], and during these wars impacts on the EAIM system become many times greater. Wars are usually waged on land and at the air-earth boundary and can impact the lithosphere, the entire atmosphere, and even geospace, as well as the geoelectric and geomagnetic fields. Wars produce atmospheric pollution of many types. These include dust, smoke, and disrup- tion in the thermal and dynamic regimes in the underlying surface-troposphere system, as well as hazardous ecological consequences, such as carbon hydrocarbon (~ 10 100 %÷ of the back- ground atmospheric content) and the acids HCl, 2 4H SO , and 3HNO (10 % of the background atmospheric content). Severe fires, electrified dust and aerosol releases, and depleted urani- um munitions releasing uranium oxide into the L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko 134 Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 air, change the conductance of large enough volumes of the air, and consequently disturb atmospheric electrical parameters over the re- gion of military operations and in the global elec- tric circuit as whole. A significant energetics of acoustic gravity waves produced by the wave disturbances acts to disturb coupling between the upper and lower atmosphere, as well as to give rise to the second- ary processes mentioned above. Other ways also exist for the processes operating in the tropo- sphere to affect the ionosphere and magneto- sphere, and hence the entire EAIM system. Accidents and Disasters. The geophysical effects and the ecological consequences of the explosions and fires at the ammunition dumps near Artemivsk city, Donetsk province, in October 2003 and near Melitopol city, Zaporizhia province, in May 2004 (Ukraine) are described in [22-24]. Disasters of this kind belong to those most signif- icant under the peace. They may be treated as active experiments. Multiple fires and explosions disturb the ther- mal and dynamic regime in the underlying sur- face-atmosphere system, when the generation, propagation, and dissipation of acoustic gravity waves activate coupling between the upper and lower atmosphere. Other ways of affecting the ionosphere and magnetosphere, i. e., the entire EAIM system, by the processes operating at the air-earth boundary cannot be excluded either. The most important result of the study of the effects that wars and accidents at ammunition dumps have is the capability of stimulating the secondary, much more powerful, processes. The latter are caused by scattering of solar radia- tion by the aerosol and absorption by the soot ejected from explosions and fires into the strato- sphere, which can be treated as Earth’s sur- face partial screening. It is important that the effects of the military operations and disasters described above are characterized by the trig- ger gains of 3 410 10 .÷ Acoustic 0.3 0.7÷ 210 300− ÷ 2 510 10−÷ Atmosphere ( 400 km)z ≤ Internal gravitational 0.3 0.7÷ 300> 4 310 10− −÷ Atmosphere ( 400 km)z ≤ Slow 10 1÷ 2 410 10÷ 3 42 10 2 10− −⋅ ÷ ⋅ Ionospheric Е region MHD 50 5÷ Same as above 3 410 10− −÷ Ionospheric F region Seismic: longitudinal 6.5 7.5÷ 0.1 30÷ 5 310 10− −÷ Lithosphere transverse 4 5÷ Same as above Same as above Same as above Khantadze (magneto-gradient): day ~ 0.3 1÷ 4(3 20) 10÷ ⋅ Not estimated Ionospheric Е region night ~ 1 5÷ 2(5 54) 10÷ ⋅ Not estimated Same as above Gyrotropic: day 10 100÷ 410 10÷ Not estimated Ionospheric Е region night 100 1000÷ Same as above Not estimated Same as above MHD ~ 1000 210−> 5 410 10− −< ÷ Ionosphere, magnetosphere Table 15. Waves transporting disturbances at global-scale distances Waves Wave velocity (km/s) Period (s) Rate of absorption (km–1) Propagation medium Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 135Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 4. Conclusions 1. The EAIM system has been validated to be a complex open dissipative nonlinear dynamical system. The main aspects of the system para- digm have been stated. 2. The main properties of the EAIM sys- tem include system’s nonlinearity, self-devel- opment, randomness, and the appearance of triggering mechanisms for releasing energy with a triggering factor attaining in some cas- es 5 1010 10 .÷ 3. The high-energy processes (earthquakes, volcano eruptions, thunderstorms, powerful tro- pospheric processes, tropical cyclones, solar ter- minators, solar eclipses, solar flares, geospace storms, etc.) have been shown to be the cause of the complex processes acting in the EAIM sys- tem, to give rise to rearrangement of the charac- ter of subsystem coupling, and to energy buildup and release. It is important that the energy fluxes from above and below, as well as from anthropogenic sources can be commensurable. 4. The basic principles of major processes acting in the TAIM and OAIM systems have been developed. 5. Seismic sources and atmospheric processes affect the upper atmosphere, ionosphere, and magnetosphere via acoustic-gravity, electromag- netic, quasi-steady (electrical, magnetic) and par- ticle precipitation channels. 6. Active experiments (explosions, rocket launches, etc.) have turned to be convenient and efficient tools for modeling subsystem coupling. 7. Wave processes play a special role in EAIM subsystem coupling. 8. Energetic electron precipitation at middle latitudes has been shown to be associated with the majority of highly variable processes operat- ing in the EAIM system. Its fluxes can be of the order of 7 9 2 110 10 m s .− −÷ ⋅ The causative mech- anisms for their precipitation have been revealed and validated. 9. The system paradigm should become the basic principle of theory, method, and metho- dology in the studies of the EAIM system as a complex open dissipative nonlinear dynamical one. References 1. L. F. Chernogor, “Physics of Earth, Atmosphere and Geospace from the Standpoint of System Paradigm”, Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59-106, 2003. 2. L. F. Chernogor, “The Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace Environment System as an Open Dynamic Nonli- near One”, Space Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 5/6, pp. 96-105, 2003. 3. L. F. Chernogor, “Earth – Atmosphere – Ionosphere – Magnetosphere as Open Dynamic Nonlinear Phy- sical System (1)”, Nonlinear World, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 655-697, 2006. 4. L. F. Chernogor, “Earth – Atmosphere – Ionosphere – Magnetosphere as Open Dynamic Nonlinear Phy- sical System (2)”, Nonlinear World, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 225-246, 2007. 5. E. I. Grigorenko, S. V. Lazorenko, V. I. Taran, L. F. Chernogor, “Wave Disturbances in the Iono- sphere Accompanying the Solar Flare and the Strongest Magnetic Storm of September 25, 1998”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 718-735, 2003. 6. E. I. Grigorenko, V. N. Lysenko, V. I. Taran, and L. F. Chernogor, “Specific Features of the Ionospheric Storm of March 20–23, 2003”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 745-757, 2005. 7. E. I. Grigorenko, V. N. Lysenko, V. I. Taran, L. F. Cher- nogor, S. V. Chernyaev, “Dynamic Processes in the Ionosphere during the Strongest Magnetic Storm of May 30–31, 2003”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 758-777, 2005. 8. L. F. Chernogor, Ye. I. Grigorenko, V. N. Lysenko, and V. I. Taran, “Dynamic processes in the iono- sphere during magnetic storms from the Kharkov incoherent scatter radar observations”, Int. J. Geomagn. Aeron., vol. 7, 2007. 9. S. V. Panasenko, L. F. Chernogor, “Event of the No- vember 7–10, 2004 Magnetic Storm in the Lower Iono- sphere”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 608-620, 2007. 10. L. F. Сhernogor, “The Tropical Cyclone as an Ele- ment of the Earth – Atmosphere – Ionosphere – Mag- netosphere System”, Space Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 2/3, pp. 16-36, 2006. L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko 136 Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 11. L. A. Akimov, V. K. Bogovskii, E. I. Grigorenko, V. I. Taran, and L. F. Chernogor, “Atmospheric-Iono- spheric Effects of the Solar Eclipse of May 31, 2003, in Kharkov”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 494-518, 2005. 12. K. P. Garmash, L. S. Kostrov, V. T. Rozumenko, O. F. Tyrnov, A. M. Tsymbal, L. F. Chernogor, “Glo- bal Ionospheric Disturbances Caused by a Rocket Launch against a Background of a Magnetic Storm”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 69-75, 1999. 13. V. P. Burmaka, V. I. Taran, L. F. Chernogor, “Iono- spheric Wave Disturbances Accompanied by Rocket Launches against a Background of Natural Transient Processes”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 476-491, 2004. 14. V. P. Burmaka, V. I. Taran, L. F. Chernogor, “Wave- Like Processes in the Ionosphere under Quiet and Disturbed Conditions. 1. Kharkov Incoherent Scatter Radar Observations”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 183-198, 2006. 15. V. P. Burmaka, V. I. Taran, L. F. Chernogor, “Wave- Like Processes in the Ionosphere under Quiet and Disturbed Conditions. 2. Analysis of Observations and Simulation”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 199-208, 2006. 16. V. P. Burmaka, V. N. Lysenko, L. F. Chernogor, and Yu. V. Chernyak, “Wave-Like Processes in the Ionospheric F Region that Accompanied Rocket Launches from the Baikonur Site”, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 742-759, 2006. 17. L. F. Chernogor, K. P. Garmash, L. S. Kostrov, V. T. Rozumenko, O. F. Tyrnov, A. M. Tsymbal, “Per- turbations in the Ionosphere Following U.S. Powerful Space Vehicle Launching”, Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 181-190, 1998. 18. L. F. Chernogor, K. P. Garmash, V. T. Rozumenko, “Flux Parameters of Energetic Particles Affecting the Middle Latitude Lower Ionosphere”, Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 191-197, 1998. 19. L. F. Chernogor and V. T. Rozumenko, “Wave Pro- cesses, Global- and Large-Scale Disturbances in the Near-Earth Plasma”, Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies. Supplement, no. 3, pp. 514-516, 2000. 20. L. F. Chernogor, L. S. Kostrov, and V. T. Rozumen- ko, “Radio Probing of the Perturbations Origina- ting in the Near-Earth Plasma from Natural and Anthropogenic Energy Sources”, Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies. Supplement, no. 3, pp. 497-500, 2000. 21. L. F. Chernogor, “Physical Processes in the Near- Earth Environment Associated with March – April 2003 Iraq War”, Space Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 2/3, pp. 13-33, 2003. 22. L. F. Chernogor, “Geophysical Effects and Geoeco- logical Consequences of Multiple Chemical Explosions at Ammunition Dumps in Artemovsk”, Geophysical Journal, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 31-44, 2004. 23. L. F. Chernogor, “Geophysical Effects and Ecologi- cal Consequences of the Fire at the Military Base Near Melitopol City”, Geophysical Journal, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 61-73, 2004. 24. L. F. Chernogor, “Ecological Consequences of Multiple Chemical Explosions from a Catastrophe Caused by Man”, Geoecology. Engineering Geo- logy. Hydrogeology. Permafrost Studies, no. 6, pp. 522-535, 2006. Земля – атмосфера – геокосмос как открытая нелинейная динамическая система Л. Ф. Черногор, В. Т. Розуменко Обоснована концепция о том, что система Земля – атмосфера – ионосфера – магнито- сфера (ЗАИМ) является сложной открытой диссипативной нелинейной динамической си- стемой, наиболее важным свойством кото- рой являются тригерные механизмы высво- бождения энергии. Сформулированы основ- ные положения системной парадигмы. Пока- зано, что высокоэнергичные явления в этой системе вызывают сложную совокупность процессов и перестройку взаимодействий подсистем. Активные эксперименты в сис- теме ЗАИМ позволили установить предел линейного описания отклика подсистем на значительные энерговыделения, определить возможность возникновения крупномасштаб- ных и глобальных возмущений от локальных и локализованных выделений энергии, а так- же выявить и идентифицировать типы волн, переносящих эти возмущения. Установлено, что бóльшая часть нестационарных процес- сов в системе ЗАИМ сопровождается сред- неширотными высыпаниями энергичных ча- стиц из магнитосферы. Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System 137Радиофизика и радиоастрономия, 2008, т. 13, №2 Земля – атмосфера – геокосмос як відкрита нелінійна динамічна система Л. Ф. Чорногор, В. Т. Розуменко Обгрунтовано концепцію про те, що сис- тема Земля – атмосфера – іоносфера – магні- тосфера (ЗАІМ) є складною відкритою диси- пативною нелінійною динамічною системою, найважливішою властивістю якої є тригерні механізми вивільнення енергії. Сформульова- но основні положення системної парадигми. Показано, що високоенергійні явища у цій сис- темі викликають складну сукупність процесів і перебудову взаємодій підсистем. Активні ек- сперименти в системі ЗАІМ дозволили встано- вити межу лінійного опису відгуку підсистем на значні енерговиділення, визначити можливість виникнення великомасштабних і глобальних збурень від локальних та локалізованих виді- лень енергії, а також виявити та ідентифікува- ти типи хвиль, що переносять ці збурення. Встановлено, що більшість нестаціонарних процесів у системі ЗАІМ супроводжується се- редньоширотними висипаннями енергійних частинок з магнітосфери.
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-8404
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1027-9636
language English
last_indexed 2025-12-01T05:03:43Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Радіоастрономічний інститут НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Chernogor, L.F.
Rozumenko, V.T.
2010-05-28T10:14:18Z
2010-05-28T10:14:18Z
2008
Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System / L.F. Chernogor, V.T. Rozumenko // Радиофизика и радиоастрономия. — 2008. — Т. 13, № 2. — С. 120-137. — Бібліогр.: 24 назв. — англ.
1027-9636
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/8404
The concept of the Earth-atmosphere-ionosphere-magnetosphere (EAIM) system as a complex open dissipative nonlinear dynamical system whose most important property is trigger mechanisms for energy releases has been validated, the basic aspects of the system paradigm being stated. Highly energetic phenomena in the system have been shown to give rise to a complex cluster of processes and to the reconstruction in the subsystem coupling. The active experiments in the EAIM system have established the limitation of the linear description of the subsystem response to large energy inputs, determined the possibility of the onset of large-scale and global-scale perturbation from local and localized energy releases, as well as revealed and identified the types of waves transferring these disturbances. The majority of highly variable processes in the EAIM system have been determined to be accompanied by energetic particle precipitations from the magnetosphere at middle latitudes.
Обоснована концепция о том, что система Земля – атмосфера – ионосфера – магнитосфера (ЗАИМ) является сложной открытой диссипативной нелинейной динамической системой, наиболее важным свойством которой являются тригерные механизмы высвобождения энергии. Сформулированы основные положения системной парадигмы. Показано, что высокоэнергичные явления в этой системе вызывают сложную совокупность процессов и перестройку взаимодействий подсистем. Активные эксперименты в системе ЗАИМ позволили установить предел линейного описания отклика подсистем на значительные энерговыделения, определить возможность возникновения крупномасштабных и глобальных возмущений от локальных и локализованных выделений энергии, а также выявить и идентифицировать типы волн, переносящих эти возмущения. Установлено, что бóльшая часть нестационарных процессов в системе ЗАИМ сопровождается среднеширотными высыпаниям
Обгрунтовано концепцію про те, що система Земля – атмосфера – іоносфера – магнітосфера (ЗАІМ) є складною відкритою дисипативною нелінійною динамічною системою, найважливішою властивістю якої є тригерні механізми вивільнення енергії. Сформульовано основні положення системної парадигми. Показано, що високоенергійні явища у цій системі викликають складну сукупність процесів і перебудову взаємодій підсистем. Активні експерименти в системі ЗАІМ дозволили встановити межу лінійного опису відгуку підсистем на значні енерговиділення, визначити можливість виникнення великомасштабних і глобальних збурень від локальних та локалізованих виділень енергії, а також виявити та ідентифікувати типи хвиль, що переносять ці збурення. Встановлено, що більшість нестаціонарних процесів у системі ЗАІМ супроводжується середньоширотними висипаннями енергійних частинок з магнітосфери.
en
Радіоастрономічний інститут НАН України
Радиофизика геокосмоса
Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System
Земля – атмосфера – геокосмос как открытая нелинейная динамическая система
Земля – атмосфера – геокосмос як відкрита нелінійна динамічна система
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System
Chernogor, L.F.
Rozumenko, V.T.
Радиофизика геокосмоса
title Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System
title_alt Земля – атмосфера – геокосмос как открытая нелинейная динамическая система
Земля – атмосфера – геокосмос як відкрита нелінійна динамічна система
title_full Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System
title_fullStr Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System
title_full_unstemmed Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System
title_short Earth – Atmosphere – Geospace as an Open Nonlinear Dynamical System
title_sort earth – atmosphere – geospace as an open nonlinear dynamical system
topic Радиофизика геокосмоса
topic_facet Радиофизика геокосмоса
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/8404
work_keys_str_mv AT chernogorlf earthatmospheregeospaceasanopennonlineardynamicalsystem
AT rozumenkovt earthatmospheregeospaceasanopennonlineardynamicalsystem
AT chernogorlf zemlâatmosferageokosmoskakotkrytaânelineinaâdinamičeskaâsistema
AT rozumenkovt zemlâatmosferageokosmoskakotkrytaânelineinaâdinamičeskaâsistema
AT chernogorlf zemlâatmosferageokosmosâkvídkritanelíníinadinamíčnasistema
AT rozumenkovt zemlâatmosferageokosmosâkvídkritanelíníinadinamíčnasistema