Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма

Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision
 of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a
 unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political
 and ideological respon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
Date:2000
Main Author: Кутуев, П.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Iнститут соціології НАН України 2000
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/89856
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 32–68. — Бібліогр.: 84 назв. — рос.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1862655877430902784
author Кутуев, П.
author_facet Кутуев, П.
citation_txt Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 32–68. — Бібліогр.: 84 назв. — рос.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
description Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision
 of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a
 unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political
 and ideological response to conditions of national dependency in peripheral societies
 of traditional bent, Leninism created new political entity — the party as organizational
 weapon — which was a bearer of impersonal charisma. Application of analitical tool
 box elaborated by Weber and Jowitt increases our understanding of the internal
 developmental logic of Leninist regimes while helping to draw a distinction between
 revolutionary system-building politics of Leninist type and nationalist modernizing
 regimes of the Third World on the one hand and fascist regimes on the other.
 The article offers an account of developmental stages of Leninist regimes— trans -
 formation, consolidation, and inclusion. The latter stage purpose was to accommodate
 new, more complex social and cultural environment to regime’s demands. Having lost
 its combat task during inclusion stage, the party entered the period of neotraditionalist
 routinization of its organizational charisma which resulted in a clash between Leninist
 status oriented cadres and emergent civic oriented styles of life. Regime’s inability to
 resolve the tension between the two mutually exclusive elements — party cadre and
 citizen — resulted in “Leninist extinction” and disappearance of Leninism as an
 alternative life style.
first_indexed 2025-12-02T02:50:19Z
format Article
fulltext
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-89856
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1563-4426
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-12-02T02:50:19Z
publishDate 2000
publisher Iнститут соціології НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Кутуев, П.
2015-12-20T09:51:42Z
2015-12-20T09:51:42Z
2000
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма / П. Кутуев // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2000. — № 4. — С. 32–68. — Бібліогр.: 84 назв. — рос.
1563-4426
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/89856
Drawing heavily upon Weber’s value-free political sociology and Ken Jowitt’s vision
 of Leninism, the paper suggests that Leninist regimes are best conceptualized as a
 unique blend of charismatic, impersonal and traditional elements. Being a political
 and ideological response to conditions of national dependency in peripheral societies
 of traditional bent, Leninism created new political entity — the party as organizational
 weapon — which was a bearer of impersonal charisma. Application of analitical tool
 box elaborated by Weber and Jowitt increases our understanding of the internal
 developmental logic of Leninist regimes while helping to draw a distinction between
 revolutionary system-building politics of Leninist type and nationalist modernizing
 regimes of the Third World on the one hand and fascist regimes on the other.
 The article offers an account of developmental stages of Leninist regimes— trans -
 formation, consolidation, and inclusion. The latter stage purpose was to accommodate
 new, more complex social and cultural environment to regime’s demands. Having lost
 its combat task during inclusion stage, the party entered the period of neotraditionalist
 routinization of its organizational charisma which resulted in a clash between Leninist
 status oriented cadres and emergent civic oriented styles of life. Regime’s inability to
 resolve the tension between the two mutually exclusive elements — party cadre and
 citizen — resulted in “Leninist extinction” and disappearance of Leninism as an
 alternative life style.
ru
Iнститут соціології НАН України
Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
Кутуев, П.
title Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_full Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_fullStr Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_full_unstemmed Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_short Пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
title_sort пролегомены к политической социологии ленинизма
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/89856
work_keys_str_mv AT kutuevp prolegomenykpolitičeskoisociologiileninizma