Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии

The paper critically analyzes the main ideas of phenomenological sociology developed by the founder of a new sociological paradigm A. Schutz. The author exposes inherent contradictions between phenomenological philosophy of E. Husserl and M. Weber’s understanding sociology. It casts doubt on a proje...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
Date:2008
Main Author: Бурлачук, В.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Iнститут соціології НАН України 2008
Online Access:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/89962
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии / В. Бурлачук // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2008. — № 4. — С. 97–118. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — рос.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
_version_ 1862589069958053888
author Бурлачук, В.
author_facet Бурлачук, В.
citation_txt Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии / В. Бурлачук // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2008. — № 4. — С. 97–118. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — рос.
collection DSpace DC
container_title Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
description The paper critically analyzes the main ideas of phenomenological sociology developed by the founder of a new sociological paradigm A. Schutz. The author exposes inherent contradictions between phenomenological philosophy of E. Husserl and M. Weber’s understanding sociology. It casts doubt on a project intended to synthesize these two knowledge domains. Besides, there is demonstrated a paradoxical nature ot the idea to construct sociological theory as based on the subjective sense of Another’s activity, which should not be coincided with sense attributed by an ‘outside spectator’. The basic premise of Schutz is that sociological theory should be constructed only after analyzing activity of an individual subject named as ‘solitary Ego’. This activity is one explored by means of phenomenological method. Sociological phenomenology takes its own approach to reanimate gnoseological Robinsonada. A. Schutz makes an attempt to draw distinctions between objective and subjective sense in the activity of ‘solitary Ego’. The scholar supposes to reveal original sources of the sense in the intentional acts of consciousness. A phenomenological approach excludes analysis of the unconscious mental activity as a source for making sense. Constituting sense, as it explained by A. Schutz, should be opposed to the assertion that sense is neither created nor constituted within the frame of individual’s consciousness intentional activity. Starting from this position, the author expresses doubt regarding possibility of objective theory about subjective sense within sociology.
first_indexed 2025-11-27T02:59:36Z
format Article
fulltext
id nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-89962
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
issn 1563-4426
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-11-27T02:59:36Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Iнститут соціології НАН України
record_format dspace
spelling Бурлачук, В.
2015-12-20T16:25:52Z
2015-12-20T16:25:52Z
2008
Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии / В. Бурлачук // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2008. — № 4. — С. 97–118. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — рос.
1563-4426
https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/89962
The paper critically analyzes the main ideas of phenomenological sociology developed by the founder of a new sociological paradigm A. Schutz. The author exposes inherent contradictions between phenomenological philosophy of E. Husserl and M. Weber’s understanding sociology. It casts doubt on a project intended to synthesize these two knowledge domains. Besides, there is demonstrated a paradoxical nature ot the idea to construct sociological theory as based on the subjective sense of Another’s activity, which should not be coincided with sense attributed by an ‘outside spectator’. The basic premise of Schutz is that sociological theory should be constructed only after analyzing activity of an individual subject named as ‘solitary Ego’. This activity is one explored by means of phenomenological method. Sociological phenomenology takes its own approach to reanimate gnoseological Robinsonada. A. Schutz makes an attempt to draw distinctions between objective and subjective sense in the activity of ‘solitary Ego’. The scholar supposes to reveal original sources of the sense in the intentional acts of consciousness. A phenomenological approach excludes analysis of the unconscious mental activity as a source for making sense. Constituting sense, as it explained by A. Schutz, should be opposed to the assertion that sense is neither created nor constituted within the frame of individual’s consciousness intentional activity. Starting from this position, the author expresses doubt regarding possibility of objective theory about subjective sense within sociology.
ru
Iнститут соціології НАН України
Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии
Article
published earlier
spellingShingle Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии
Бурлачук, В.
title Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии
title_full Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии
title_fullStr Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии
title_full_unstemmed Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии
title_short Интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии
title_sort интеллектуальные уловки феноменологической социологии
url https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/89962
work_keys_str_mv AT burlačukv intellektualʹnyeulovkifenomenologičeskoisociologii