Приватизация в Украине как социально-экономический процесс: объективные показатели и субъективные оценки

The article deals with the dynamics of objective indices and subjective estimations of
 privatization in Ukraine. The author emphasizes the importance of a broader interpretation of the “privatization” notion that would allow to consider the above mentioned phenomenon as a social reinstituti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг
Datum:2006
ISSN:1563-4426
1. Verfasser: Резник, В.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Russisch
Veröffentlicht: Iнститут соціології НАН України 2006
Online Zugang:https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/90305
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Приватизация в Украине как социально-экономический процесс: объективные показатели и субъективные оценки / В. Резник // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2006. — № 2. — С. 66–89. — Бібліогр.: 23 назв. — рос.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The article deals with the dynamics of objective indices and subjective estimations of
 privatization in Ukraine. The author emphasizes the importance of a broader interpretation of the “privatization” notion that would allow to consider the above mentioned phenomenon as a social reinstitutionalization of private ownership, private enterprise,
 and labor market. The abovementioned reinstitutionalization is to examine on the base
 of structure ownership and employment indices in their dynamics. Such an analysis
 allows to conclude that the market economy institutions are renewed as well as
 parallelism and common tendencies in their forming exist. Moreover, the author
 adduces opinions on privatization processes expressed by the Ukrainian citizens as
 well as expert estimations of private ownership. All this gives grounds for assuming
 that social delegitimization of the privatization process is not necessarily the case for
 a similar delegitimization of the private ownership institution on the whole.
ISSN:1563-4426