Государственное ресурсоизвлечение и демократия
The author's complex argument is built on two components. First, whether rulers acquire their means of rule by producing those means, buying them with monopolized goods, or extracting them from subject populations deeply affects the character of rule. Second, over the long run democratization o...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
|---|---|
| Date: | 2007 |
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Iнститут соціології НАН України
2007
|
| Online Access: | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/90360 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Journal Title: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Cite this: | Государственное ресурсоизвлечение и демократия / Ч. Тилли // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2007. — № 4. — С. 38-49. — Бібліогр.: 17 назв. — рос. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| Summary: | The author's complex argument is built on two components. First, whether rulers acquire their means of rule by producing those means, buying them with monopolized goods, or extracting them from subject populations deeply affects the character of rule. Second, over the long run democratization only occurs when rulers come to rely on citizen compliance for their means of rule. The first component implies that students of fiscality could effectively strong then their theories by considering the whole range of state-sustaining resources before closing in on taxation as a special way of acquiring those resources. The second component implies that students of fiscality are following the spoor of democratization and, for that matter, de-democratization. Thus, we can track down the causes of fundamental changes and variations in political regimes.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1563-4426 |