Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity
Досліджено механізм трансплантації інститутів мережевої економіки як необхідний чинник зростання конкурентоспроможності єврорегіонів в умовах євроінтеграції України. На основі інституційного підходу обґрунтовано, що постіндустріальна економіка еволюціонувала в систему взаємодіючих інститутів формуют...
Збережено в:
| Опубліковано в: : | Економічні інновації |
|---|---|
| Дата: | 2015 |
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Англійська |
| Опубліковано: |
Інститут проблем ринку та економіко-екологічних досліджень НАН України
2015
|
| Онлайн доступ: | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/95431 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Цитувати: | Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity / S.I. Kovalenko // Економічні інновації: Зб. наук. пр. — Одеса: ІПРЕЕД НАН України, 2015. — Вип. 60, т. I. — С. 186-198. — Бібліогр.: 16 назв. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| _version_ | 1859909693559799808 |
|---|---|
| author | Kovalenko, S.I. |
| author_facet | Kovalenko, S.I. |
| citation_txt | Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity / S.I. Kovalenko // Економічні інновації: Зб. наук. пр. — Одеса: ІПРЕЕД НАН України, 2015. — Вип. 60, т. I. — С. 186-198. — Бібліогр.: 16 назв. — англ. |
| collection | DSpace DC |
| container_title | Економічні інновації |
| description | Досліджено механізм трансплантації інститутів мережевої економіки як необхідний чинник зростання конкурентоспроможності єврорегіонів в умовах євроінтеграції України. На основі інституційного підходу обґрунтовано, що постіндустріальна економіка еволюціонувала в систему взаємодіючих інститутів формують новий економічний простір постмодерну в транскордонному вимірі. Розглянуто сутність та внутрішні взаємозв'язки транскордонного кластеру як чинника зростання конкурентоспроможності єврорегіону.
The mechanism of transplantation of network economics institutions is studied as the necessary growth factor of competitive capacity of the European regions in terms of European integration. By means of institutional approach it is justified that postindustrial economics evolved into the system of interlocking institutions, forming a new economic area of postmodernity in cross-border dimension, in which such virtual resources of development are necessary as: information, innovations, ways of communication, knowledge and other institutions of postindustrial society. The subject and internal connections of cross-border cluster is investigated as the growth factor of competitive capacity of the European region in terms of tightening the integration process and the necessity of enhancement of the role of peripheral regions economics under cross-border cooperation.
It is concluded that a new postmodern reality lies in the combination of postindustrial production with the network construction of economic area, involving transplantation of the institutions by means of self-organization of hybrid network clusters on both sides of the border that becomes the factor of integration and free circulation of the funds in the European regions.
|
| first_indexed | 2025-12-07T16:01:46Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
186 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
2015
УДК 339.92:332.1
CROSS-BORDER CLUSTERS AS THE FORM OF
TRANSPLANTATION OF INSTITUTIONS INTO ECONOMIC AREA
OF POSTMODERNITY
Kovalenko Sergei I.
Досліджено механізм трансплантації інститутів мережевої
економіки як необхідний чинник зростання конкурентоспроможності
єврорегіонів в умовах євроінтеграції України. На основі інституційного
підходу обґрунтовано, що постіндустріальна економіка еволюціонувала в
систему взаємодіючих інститутів формують новий економічний простір
постмодерну в транскордонному вимірі. Розглянуто сутність та
внутрішні взаємозв'язки транскордонного кластеру як чинника зростання
конкурентоспроможності єврорегіону.
Formulation of the problem in general terms.
Postmodernity is called an epoch of disappointed modernization, when
the reality disappears and network structures forming virtual economic area
come to the fore. The development of economics of postmodernity takes place
as a result of transition from centralized system of economic area control to
pluralism, and further transition from vertical hierarchical layers to horizontal
networks. This process is identified by western scientists as ―quasi integration‖.
The justification of theory and methodology of the regional science is closely
connected with the development of postindustrial paradigm in the evolution of
all sides of life in the European region including economical as well as social
aspects. One of the current trends of the postmodern society development is the
growing role of network communication. Network resources become a new
source of competitive benefits of the periphery regions and as a matter of fact
change not only the system of factors of accommodation, but also the structure
of the economic area itself. In much measure, the implementation of cluster of
the business organization in cross-border dimension contributes to the
development of network structure of economic area, enhancing its unity and
2015 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
187
integrity. International experience of the developed countries conclusively
proves not only the effectiveness, but also inevitable consistent pattern of
emergence of different kinds of cross-border network clusters.
According to the European practice, the border is the main deterrent of
the boundary regions development. In this respect one of the main aims of
boundary cooperation is the neutralization or cushioning of the negative effects
of the borders [1, p. 4].
Information technologies resulted in the network society. Sophistication
of the economic area accompanied with bifurcations inevitably leads to its self-
organization. In the network society due to information technologies new
connections are developed. They cause blurring of boundaries and conventions
and as a result there appears a great amount of opportunities in the form of
bifurcations such as electronic commerce, virtual communities, virtual
enterprises, creation of cyber cities-states. Network economy is super-
transparent and super-fast. But the most important thing is that it creates
favorable conditions to import effective institutions forming new kinds of
economic area organization.
Analysis of research and publications of recent years show great
interest towards the problems of competitive capacity of boundary regions. The
possibility of using market instruments in the process of clusterization is
studied in the works of M. Porter [2 - 4], G. J. Bolt, J. Tolenado, P. Doyle, F.
Kotler, H. Lay, J.-J. Lambin, A. Toffler, etc. The experience of the developed
countries proves that improvement of the economics competitiveness can be
reached only through transition to the innovative model of the development, the
ultimate target of which is to raise the well-being of the people by means of
speedup of economic growth.
Michael Porter in his work ―The Competitive Advantage of Nations‖
comes to the conclusion that when the investment policies are being worked out
emerging economies must aim at the development of interrelating industrial
clusters on the ground of primary and secondary spheres. The approach to the
evaluation of competitiveness of the region can be defined with the help of the
concept of competitive advantage of the country, offered by M. Porter [3, p.
146].
In the works of J. Shumpeter [5, p. 182], K. Arrow, R. Nelson and S.
Winter the problems of market structure organization and competitive
development are studied as the factors of increasing innovation activity of
economic systems. The scholars investigated the mechanism of market parties
188 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
2015
integration, formation of new innovation structures with the aim to create the
product, technological and organizational innovation. Other representatives of
the institutional economics (O. Williamson, R. Coase, W. Nordhaus, F. Hayek)
contributed to the solving of the given problem. In their research studies the
scholars:
1) paid attention to the disadvantages of information that was the obstacle
of mutually beneficial actions, the difference between explicit knowledge
(which is codified) and implicit (tacit) knowledge;
2) focused on the study of the influence of transaction expenses on the
advantages of various organizational forms preeminence. In modern scientific
literature industrial regions, holdings, technological platforms, territorial-
production complexes (TPC) that educate the regions, etc. are referred to spatial
forms of industrial integration network. In the course of time the concept
―industrial region‖ has evolved into the analysis of transformation of distinctive
characteristics, that was worked out by A. Marshall, G. Becattini, O.
Williamson [6, p. 211].
At present there exist various hybrid forms of cross-border quasi-
integration such as clusters, business associations, strategic alliances, various
network-societies, etc. They are the associations of the European regions
economic entity with steady long-term relations between them and delegation
of control on management of the general operations without any legally-issued
transfer of the right to property.
The relevant topic is widely reflected in the works of many Ukrainian
scientists: M. Dolyshni, V. Hayets‘ [7, 8], Yu. Makohon [9], S. Maksymenko,
P. Bielenki, N. Mikula [10], etc. Their scientific research results are connected
with the study of spatial development and cooperation of the boundary regions
in terms of the EU functioning, applying the corresponding experience for
Ukraine.
Previously unsolved aspects of the problem.
One of the most important priorities of the Ukrainian regional economic
policy has become the realization of the possibilities of each boundary region to
overcome the crisis and providing the development of the economics by
improving the quality of economic area. Such approach fully concerns the
boundary regions in which the process of globalization and European
integration brings the external economic factors to the forefront. Under their
influence there occurs a transformation of the boundary regional economy
which is connected with its structural changes, with the search of new forms of
2015 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
189
economic area organization and with the competitiveness improvement of the
region.
Nowadays the task is to work out the theory and methodological
principles of strategic planning of the creation and development of cross-border
cluster systems in different sectors of economy by taking into account their
potential role as a purpose accomplishing and problem solving system focused
on the solving the tasks of the modernization of the Ukrainian periphery
regions.
Nonetheless, it is necessary to point out that the mechanisms of formation
of cross-border cluster systems in Ukraine are not investigated practically. That
is why it is necessary to investigate the topic. As Academy Fellow V. Hayets‘
states, there are no methodological approaches to the evaluation of economic
effectiveness of the cluster formations in different spheres of economic activity,
especially for the potential development of the regional formations as
structurally integral and original territory administration units [8, p. 10].
Statement of the problem.
The task of the article is to work out the methodological approach to the
usage of cluster forms of quasi integration for transplantation the institutes of
cross-border economic area in conditions of network economy formation of
postmodernity.
The main material of the research.
The European region as quasi-corporation is a great subject of property
(regional and municipal) and economic activity. In this case the European
regions become participants of competitive struggle at the markets of goods,
services, funds (protection of the trademark of local products, investment
rating). The European region as economic entity cooperates with national and
transnational corporations.
Ukraine tries to implement an institution of cross-border cooperation by
means of its transplantation from the most developed environment into less
developed one. Thus, the state tries to speed up the institutional development,
but there emerges the risk of rejection and dysfunction of transplanted
institutions [10, p. 166].
In the translation of Douglas North‘s book ―Institutions, Institutional
Change and Economic Performance‖, in which the theoretical framework of
institutions is developed, there are two concepts – ―institution‖ and
―organization‖. ―Institution‖ is defined as the rules of play in the society, or, to
190 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
2015
be more precise, restrictions invented by people, which direct the cooperation
of people in a certain way. They form incentives in the process of the human
exchange – political, social or economic. The institutional change determines
the way by which people are determined in the course of time. Institutional
restrictions can be official – the rules invented by people (legislation), and non-
official – in the form of customs and code of behavior. Institutional restrictions
embrace not only the prohibition of doing something, but also the conditions on
which it is allowed to carry out certain activities, that is they form the basis on
which human interaction is performed [11, p. 11, 12].
Like institutions, organizations also form human interaction.
Organizations embrace political authorities (political parties, the Senate, city
council, regulatory agency), economic bodies (firms, family farms,
cooperatives, trade unions), public authorities (schools, universities, vocational
training centers) and are established on this institutional basis. They are made
of a group of individuals connected with each other by the common desire to
achieve certain goals [11, p. 13].
But, if from English the word ―Institution‖ is translated as – 1)
establishment, 2) something established (law, custom, system), 3) organized
society, establishment, office, institution, etc., in the Ukrainian language it also
corresponds to the term ―institution‖
1
.
Institutions identify opportunities in the society, but organizations are
created in order to use these opportunities. Institutional changes occur with the
help of the created symbiosis between ―the rules of the play‖ and institutions
(organizations) which were developed under the influence of the incentive
structure created by the institutions and under the influence of feedback, when
people realize their status and react to the changes in the amount of
opportunities. Usage of the term ―institutional changes‖ concerns the cases
when the changes of organizations (structures) realizing (providing) ―rules of
the play‖ are meant.
Transplantation is the process of transferring the institutions, which
developed in any other institutional environment.
Any process of transplantation includes three main stages:
1) choice of the transplant and the strategies of transplantation;
2) creation of the transplantation infrastructure; creation of auxiliary and
intermediate institutions;
1
Note. In Russian the translation of Douglas North‘s book sounds as: Институты,
институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. – М.: 1997.
2015 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
191
3) implementation of activities which facilitates adaptation of economic
agents for new institution.
During the transplantation of the institution there appears a new scope of
opportunities for the economic agents. There appear a wide range of strategies
embracing new institutional and, in particular, legislative limits. Some of the
strategies remain within those limits, other involve their violations.
Transplantation is aimed at the change of the old equilibrium. The adoption of
the new institution by the agents and its stable functioning depend on the
transplantation expenses and on the value of transaction costs of the
transplanted and the current standard of behavior. The expenses in their turn
are controlled by the institutional structure and the cultural environment of the
recipient country, macroeconomic situation, and mechanisms of coordination,
impetus, inertia and education [12].
If the transplantation is successful the period of positive adaptation of the
institution to a new institutional or cultural environment is relatively short: the
institution plays the same role in the recipient country as in the donor-
economics. Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary transplanted the
institution of cross-border cooperation from the Western Europe and
beneficially use its opportunities.
This process began in all the countries almost simultaneously (and in
Ukraine as well), but, it can be pointed out that all the Central and East
European countries in this question are one step ahead. Unlike Ukraine, the
main aim of the above mentioned countries – to integrate into European Union
– is achieved, and not the least role was by played the institution of cross-
border cooperation as the proving ground for testing and adaptation of the
European legislation, tools increasing the role of the regions, adaptation of
financial support mechanisms. In Ukraine the development of the institution of
cross-border cooperation was a bit slowed down and its functions were
distorted.
V.M. Polterovich determines three types of dysfunction of new
institutions: 1. Atrophy and degeneration. 2. Activation of alternative
institutions and rejection. 3. Institutional conflict. 4. Paradox of transfer [12, p.
5-9]. It is useful to clearly imagine the strategy of transplantation for the
dysfunctions not to appear.
In recent times a number of researchers stated that the most useful is the
strategy of ―growing‖ the institutions [13]. This strategy provides for the
possibility of using the institution ―from the past‖ of the donor country at any
stage of its development. It is assumed that spontaneous evolution of
192 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
2015
transplanted institution will – directly or indirectly – contribute to the creation
of the form adequate to the conditions of the recipient country. The ―growing‖
allows the simultaneous transplantation of some variants of the institution and
their co-existence (competitiveness) with the same institutions of the recipient
and, to our opinion, the possibility of correction of the transplantation process.
It is also useful to state that the institution of the cross-border cooperation
may not be the institution of high priority, but it is one of the closest institutions
to the individual citizen, to all the spheres of his vital activities in a boundary,
periphery region. On the basis of this institution it is possible to test and adapt
all the new mechanisms and instruments of socio-economic, political,
ecological, cultural, educational and spiritual life of the population,
transplanting all these from the most developed environment with the
corresponding compliance with the technology and the chosen aim. Thus, one
more role of the international cooperation of the regions is determined as
ground for testing and adaptation of the European legislature, instruments for
enhancing the role of the regions, adaptation of the financial aid mechanisms.
This role covers all types of international cooperation of the regions and is
widely used by the countries of Central and Eastern Europe in the process of
transplantation of the institutions of cross-border cooperation.
The countries of Central and Eastern Europe had another significant
incentive, which was supported by practically all the significant political forces
– their return to Europe, faster integration into the main European institutions.
The enforcement to harmonize their legislature with the European one left them
fewer opportunities for institutional improvisations and made them be more
consistent and rigid while rebuilding disciplinary mechanisms designed to
protect new ―rules of the play‖.
Cluster strategy of the cross-border cooperation provides for the forming
of geographically localized cluster unions of the boundary regions around
foreign companies-innovators, the network agents of which (the manufacturers
of innovative products and services, suppliers, the infrastructure objects,
research centers, universities) cooperate on the basis of competitiveness and
cooperation, generating synergy effect, mutually supporting each other and
strengthening competitive advantages either of the companies themselves or of
the cluster in general. Clusters are inevitably associated with the networks
which are formal and informal organizations and which simplify information
and technologies exchange and promote coordination and cooperation between
the members of the clusters.
2015 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
193
Cross-border clusters cover the neighboring boundary territories of the
adjacent countries, which include institutions and firms located on the both
sides of the borderline. That is why cross-border clusters can be determined as
groups of independent companies and associated institutions which are
geographically concentrated in the cross-border region; cooperate and compete;
specialize in different branches, connected with general technologies and skills
and which complement each other and as a result it enables to get synergetic
and network effects, diffusion of knowledge and skills [14, p. 407].
Within a cluster there is created an additional economic effect which
strengthens competitive advantage of the region. Enterprise not included into
the cluster gets an additional synergetic effect by means of resource sharing
(technologies and expenses strategy), market infrastructure (total sales) and
fields of activities (synergy of management planning). The importance of the
synergy strategy lies in the fact that it helps to get higher profitability of
production in case if enterprisers-members of the cluster cooperate, than when
it is managed separately [15, p. 145]. Synergetic effect is the increasing of
efficiency as a result of connection, integration, arrangement of single parts
within a complex system by means of the so-called positive systemic effect
(effect of emergence) where the effect of cooperation between the participants
of the union inside the integral system exceeds the sum of the effects of the
activity of each participant separately (independently) [16, p. 29].
Investigating the problem of competitive capacity, M. Porter singled out
three main advantages of the clusters. Firstly, they increase productiveness,
making all the specialized resources and work available, facilitating access to
information, institutions, public goods. Secondly, clusters stimulate higher rates
of emerging new business-formations by converting workers of the operating
companies into new entrepreneurs. Thirdly, they increase the capacity of the
firms to innovate with the help of more rapid diffusion of technological
knowledge.
The unique capacity of cluster to accelerate the diffusion of innovations
helps to determine them as innovative economic agglomeration or as the area of
high innovative activity. Any cluster is a network structure with the ideology of
competitive cooperation (or co-competition) under which the development
incentives created by the participants of the network are connected with the
intensification of cooperation in mutually profitable direction. The network
model organization of the economic area of the country becomes more
advanced in contemporary conditions. On this model there are organized
regions which were actively involved in the global system of exchanging goods,
194 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
2015
finances, labour power, technologies and information. They represent the
network of independent, but at the same time interchangeable enterprises. The
enterprises specializing on the producing this or that good are concentrated on
one territory which connects the branch with the given region, but does not lead
to its centralization. Enterprises cooperate on the basis of agreements on
cooperation or sub-contracting relationships. One part of the enterprises brings
their production at the market, all the others perform operations on demand of
the group of enterprises which initiated the given production. In general, all the
enterprises located on a certain territory of the country create a network of
cooperation and interaction or network cluster. The basic component of the
cluster theory is a group of institutional theories determining the economy as
the system of cooperating institutions. In this case the cluster itself can be
defined as a modern institution combining in different proportions a system of
formalized and non-formalized relations of either its participants between
themselves or the cluster with its external environment. Besides, synergetic
effect emerging as a result of cooperation of enterprises within a cluster is
explained largely by the transaction cost savings in obtaining information,
specification of property right, reduction of cost value, etc. Thus, R. Coase‘s
theory of transaction expenses in addition to the non-classical theory is mostly
applied to the explanation of synergetic effect and evaluation of the
effectiveness of cluster development. In the narrow sense in the report made by
European Commission, the global network economy is defined as environment
in which any company or individual located at any point of economic system
can easily and with minimal cost contact with any other company or individual
concerning cooperation, for trade, to exchange ideas and know-how or just for
pleasure. In the broader sense the emergence of network economy is connected
with the development of information technologies which results in evolution of
modern economic systems, development of non-market regulation mechanisms
and network organizational structures. On the whole there appears a sort of
non-branch economics predominantly based on horizontal relations.
For the development of the postmodernity economics virtual resources of
development are important: information, innovations, infrastructure
(communications), knowledge, skills and institutions of postindustrial society.
To the recent trends of preserving competitive advantages of cross-border
regions are referred: formation of postindustrial development institutions – the
instruments of decision-making (clusters, holdings, associations, etc.) and
increasing knowledge-intensity of production and consumption. In modern
context of economic growth it is necessary to reach a new level of institutional
2015 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
195
development – network institutions of decision-making. For cross-border region
it means the usage of new concepts ―trans-region context, atmosphere,
environment‖, intangible factors of cross-border culture, traditions, values in
the given region. What was considered on default everywhere the same and
what could be ignored in the era of new economics, becomes the source of
competitive advantage. Economy of knowledge as a constituent part of the
postmodernity economics now rests not on natural resources, but on human
capital and that is why it opens the question before regional politics about the
formation of the environment for reconstruction and development of human and
natural resources on the both sides of the border.
Knowledge and information become key source of productivity and
competitiveness of these two determinative factors of any economics. New
network economics is organized around information networks having no centre
and is based on the constant cooperation between the nodes of these networks
no matter if they are local or global. Network forms of organization provide
considerable flexibility of the firms, individuals and countries, enabling them to
constantly adapt to the whirl-like change of the conditions of capital, demand
and technologies. The only rule is the absence of any rules. Even if there are
any, they use the majority of networks.
Conclusions and recommendations for further development.
Thus, in modern postindustrial paradigm of regional development the
priority of the main factors of location is being considerably transformed and it
changes the functions of periphery territory: from the physical basis - the
location of material (related to resources) factors of production it is being
transformed into the environment for the development of human capital assets,
innovations and the insuring of self- development of the European region:
1. A new postmodernity reality is defined as the combination of
postindustrial production and network structure of the economic environment
that presupposes the transplantation of the institutions by means of self-
organizing of hybrid network clusters on the both sides of the border becoming
the factor of cohesion and free circulation of the capitals in the European
regions. The competitiveness in the new mode of production is determined by
the rate of innovation and the capacity to continuously upgrade.
2. In the modern economic theory the dichotomy ―integration –
disintegration‖ is supplemented by one more category – ―quasi integration‖,
and the dichotomy ―firm – market‖ is expanded by the category ―hybrid‖.
Using the criterion of the resources control, the quasi integration can be
196 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
2015
determined as the process of taking over the behavior of formally independent
companies with no control over their property.
3. A key feature of the cluster as the form of quasi integration is its
geographical location, which reflects the concentration on the limited territory
of the interconnecting companies, specialist providers and service providers,
which compete and cooperate at the same time. Many specialists define clusters
as practically an only one source of investments and innovations. Clusters are
still considered to be some theoretical construction which practically does not
have any tangible shape and positive externalities. But in the long-term future
these quasi integration forms will become the main motivation of the innovative
development.
References
1. Європейська Рамкова Конвенція про транскордонне
співробітництво між територіальними общинами або властями (21 травня
1980, м. Мадрид). Текст українською мовою.— Рада Європи. 35 с.
2. Porter M. E. Clusters and competition: new agendas for
companies, governments, and institutions // Porter M. E. On Competition.
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
3. Porter M. The Competitiveness Advantage of Nations. - London:
Macmillan, 1990.
4. Porter M. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing
Industries and Competitors. N.Y., 1980.
5. Шумпетер Й. Теория экономического развития
(Исследование предпринимательской прибыли, капитала, кредита,
процента и цикла конъюнктуры) / Йозеф Шумпетер; [ пер. с англ.]. — М.:
Прогресс, 1982. — 455 с.
6. Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. –New
York: Free Press, 1985. – 450 p.
7. Економіка України: стратегія і політика довгострокового
розвитку / за ред. акад. НАН України В.М. Гейця. – К.: Ін-т екон.
прогнозув.; Фенікс, 2003. -1008 с.
8. Геєць В. Кластери і мережеві структури в економіці – тема
досить цікава, але на сьогодні ще до кінця не вивчена // Економіст.- ғ10.
– 2008. – С.10 -11.
9. Макогон Ю.В., Ляшенко В.И. Формы и направления
2015 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
197
межрегионального трансграничного сотрудничества: Монография, изд. 2-
е, исп. и допол./ -Донецк: ООО "Юго-Восток, Лтд", 2003. -512 с. - С. 176-
177.
10. Мікула Н.А. Проблеми трансплантації інституту
транскордонного співробітництва в Україні // Проблемы и перспективы
развития сотрудничества между странами Юго-Восточной Европы в
рамках Черноморского экономического сотрудничества и ГУУАМ. – Сб.
научн. тр. Донецк-Мариуполь: ДонНУ, 2004. - С.166-169.
11. Норт Д. Інституції, інституційна зміна та функціонування
економіки / Пер. З англ.. І.Дзюб. – К.: Основи, 2000. – 198 с.
12. Полтерович В.М. Институциональные ловушки и
экономические реформы // Экономика и математические методы. 1999. Т.
35. Вып. 2.
13. Полтерович В.М. Технология трансплантации
экономических институтов. // Экономическая наука современной России –
2001. - ғ 3. – 25 с.
14. Коваленко С.И. Стратегия трансграничной кооперации ЕС
как фактор глобальной экономической безопасности / С.И. Коваленко //
Міжнародна економічна політика. Спец. випуск. - Частина 1: Науковий
журнал Київського національного економічного університету імені
Вадима Гетьмана. - Київ: КНЕУ, 2012. – С. 405 – 411.
15. Коваленко С.І. Транскордонний кластер як форма
просторового розвитку єврорегіонів / С.І. Коваленко // Вісник соціально-
економічних досліджень. Зб. наук. пр. ғ3 (50), Частина II Одеського
національного економічного університету. – Одеса: ОНЕУ, 2013. – С. 140-
147.
16. Войнаренко М.П. Кластери як полюси зростання
конкурентоспроможності регіонів // Економіст. - ғ10. – 2008. – С. 27-30.
Abstract
Kovalenko S.I.
Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions
into economic area of postmodernity
The mechanism of transplantation of network economics institutions is
studied as the necessary growth factor of competitive capacity of the European
regions in terms of European integration. By means of institutional approach it
is justified that postindustrial economics evolved into the system of interlocking
198 Економічні інновації
Випуск № 60 Книга І
2015
institutions, forming a new economic area of postmodernity in cross-border
dimension, in which such virtual resources of development are necessary as:
information, innovations, ways of communication, knowledge and other
institutions of postindustrial society. The subject and internal connections of
cross-border cluster is investigated as the growth factor of competitive capacity
of the European region in terms of tightening the integration process and the
necessity of enhancement of the role of peripheral regions economics under
cross-border cooperation.
It is concluded that a new postmodern reality lies in the combination of
postindustrial production with the network construction of economic area,
involving transplantation of the institutions by means of self-organization of
hybrid network clusters on both sides of the border that becomes the factor of
integration and free circulation of the funds in the European regions.
|
| id | nasplib_isofts_kiev_ua-123456789-95431 |
| institution | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| issn | XXXX-0066 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-12-07T16:01:46Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Інститут проблем ринку та економіко-екологічних досліджень НАН України |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | Kovalenko, S.I. 2016-02-26T16:34:59Z 2016-02-26T16:34:59Z 2015 Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity / S.I. Kovalenko // Економічні інновації: Зб. наук. пр. — Одеса: ІПРЕЕД НАН України, 2015. — Вип. 60, т. I. — С. 186-198. — Бібліогр.: 16 назв. — англ. XXXX-0066 https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/95431 339.92:332.1 Досліджено механізм трансплантації інститутів мережевої економіки як необхідний чинник зростання конкурентоспроможності єврорегіонів в умовах євроінтеграції України. На основі інституційного підходу обґрунтовано, що постіндустріальна економіка еволюціонувала в систему взаємодіючих інститутів формують новий економічний простір постмодерну в транскордонному вимірі. Розглянуто сутність та внутрішні взаємозв'язки транскордонного кластеру як чинника зростання конкурентоспроможності єврорегіону. The mechanism of transplantation of network economics institutions is studied as the necessary growth factor of competitive capacity of the European regions in terms of European integration. By means of institutional approach it is justified that postindustrial economics evolved into the system of interlocking institutions, forming a new economic area of postmodernity in cross-border dimension, in which such virtual resources of development are necessary as: information, innovations, ways of communication, knowledge and other institutions of postindustrial society. The subject and internal connections of cross-border cluster is investigated as the growth factor of competitive capacity of the European region in terms of tightening the integration process and the necessity of enhancement of the role of peripheral regions economics under cross-border cooperation. It is concluded that a new postmodern reality lies in the combination of postindustrial production with the network construction of economic area, involving transplantation of the institutions by means of self-organization of hybrid network clusters on both sides of the border that becomes the factor of integration and free circulation of the funds in the European regions. en Інститут проблем ринку та економіко-екологічних досліджень НАН України Економічні інновації Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity Article published earlier |
| spellingShingle | Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity Kovalenko, S.I. |
| title | Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity |
| title_full | Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity |
| title_fullStr | Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity |
| title_short | Cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity |
| title_sort | cross-border clusters as the form of transplantation of institutions into economic area of postmodernity |
| url | https://nasplib.isofts.kiev.ua/handle/123456789/95431 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kovalenkosi crossborderclustersastheformoftransplantationofinstitutionsintoeconomicareaofpostmodernity |