Testing the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Summer Bat Fauna Inventory

Effective techniques of fauna inventory and biodiversity monitoring are essential for obtaining reliable data on species composition, population structure, and habitat use. Bats remain one of the least studied groups of mammals, yet they are important indicators of natural habitat condition. We pres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2025
Main Authors: Prylutska , A., Kravchenko , K., Vlaschenko, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Publishing House "Akademperiodyka" of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2025
Online Access:https://ojs.akademperiodyka.org.ua/index.php/Zoodiversity/article/view/824
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Zoodiversity

Institution

Zoodiversity
_version_ 1856543594794450944
author Prylutska , A.
Kravchenko , K.
Vlaschenko, A.
author_facet Prylutska , A.
Kravchenko , K.
Vlaschenko, A.
author_sort Prylutska , A.
baseUrl_str
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2025-12-18T11:49:27Z
description Effective techniques of fauna inventory and biodiversity monitoring are essential for obtaining reliable data on species composition, population structure, and habitat use. Bats remain one of the least studied groups of mammals, yet they are important indicators of natural habitat condition. We present a comparison of the results of two survey methods, mist-netting and acoustic recordings, conducted at the same locations to assess summer bat assemblages in the National Nature Park "Homilsha Forest" (Kharkiv Region, Ukraine). Mist-netting yielded 440 individuals of 10 bat species, while acoustic recordings allowed the detection of 8 species, with a total of 3,468 echolocation sequences treated as individual records. Two species (Myotis brandtii and Pipistrellus kuhlii) were detected exclusively through mist-netting, whereas all other species were detected by both survey methods. The Jaccard index ranged from 0.70 to 0.80, indicating partial overlap of the two survey methods in terms of species detection. Species relative abundance differed significantly between the two methods (Сhi-square test, p < 0.001). Mist-netting and acoustic recordings yielded different estimates of relative abundance for several species, suggesting method-specific biases in a bat species abundance assessment. The survey method also had a significant effect on species richness and relative abundance (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). In summary, we recommend a mist-netting survey as the best method for species identification (and population structure) and acoustic recording as a monitoring tool for summer bat assemblages.
first_indexed 2026-02-08T08:05:43Z
format Article
id oai:ojs.akademperiodyka.org.ua:article-824
institution Zoodiversity
language English
last_indexed 2026-02-08T08:05:43Z
publishDate 2025
publisher Publishing House "Akademperiodyka" of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs.akademperiodyka.org.ua:article-8242025-12-18T11:49:27Z Testing the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Summer Bat Fauna Inventory Prylutska , A. Kravchenko , K. Vlaschenko, A. biodiversity monitoring Eastern Europe species richness bats protected area conservation Effective techniques of fauna inventory and biodiversity monitoring are essential for obtaining reliable data on species composition, population structure, and habitat use. Bats remain one of the least studied groups of mammals, yet they are important indicators of natural habitat condition. We present a comparison of the results of two survey methods, mist-netting and acoustic recordings, conducted at the same locations to assess summer bat assemblages in the National Nature Park "Homilsha Forest" (Kharkiv Region, Ukraine). Mist-netting yielded 440 individuals of 10 bat species, while acoustic recordings allowed the detection of 8 species, with a total of 3,468 echolocation sequences treated as individual records. Two species (Myotis brandtii and Pipistrellus kuhlii) were detected exclusively through mist-netting, whereas all other species were detected by both survey methods. The Jaccard index ranged from 0.70 to 0.80, indicating partial overlap of the two survey methods in terms of species detection. Species relative abundance differed significantly between the two methods (Сhi-square test, p < 0.001). Mist-netting and acoustic recordings yielded different estimates of relative abundance for several species, suggesting method-specific biases in a bat species abundance assessment. The survey method also had a significant effect on species richness and relative abundance (two-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). In summary, we recommend a mist-netting survey as the best method for species identification (and population structure) and acoustic recording as a monitoring tool for summer bat assemblages. Publishing House "Akademperiodyka" of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2025-10-02 Article Article application/pdf https://ojs.akademperiodyka.org.ua/index.php/Zoodiversity/article/view/824 10.15407/zoo2025.06.533 Zoodiversity; Vol. 59 No. 6 (2025): Zoodiversity Zoodiversity (Vestnik Zoologii); Том 59 № 6 (2025): Zoodiversity 2707-7268 2707-725X 10.15407/zoo2025.06 en https://ojs.akademperiodyka.org.ua/index.php/Zoodiversity/article/view/824/358 Copyright (c) 2025 Anton Vlaschenko
spellingShingle Prylutska , A.
Kravchenko , K.
Vlaschenko, A.
Testing the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Summer Bat Fauna Inventory
title Testing the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Summer Bat Fauna Inventory
title_full Testing the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Summer Bat Fauna Inventory
title_fullStr Testing the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Summer Bat Fauna Inventory
title_full_unstemmed Testing the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Summer Bat Fauna Inventory
title_short Testing the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Summer Bat Fauna Inventory
title_sort testing the effectiveness of two methods of summer bat fauna inventory
topic_facet biodiversity monitoring
Eastern Europe
species richness
bats
protected area
conservation
url https://ojs.akademperiodyka.org.ua/index.php/Zoodiversity/article/view/824
work_keys_str_mv AT prylutskaa testingtheeffectivenessoftwomethodsofsummerbatfaunainventory
AT kravchenkok testingtheeffectivenessoftwomethodsofsummerbatfaunainventory
AT vlaschenkoa testingtheeffectivenessoftwomethodsofsummerbatfaunainventory