ДЕЯКІ АСПЕКТИ АПЕЛЯЦІЙНОГО ПРОВАДЖЕННЯ В ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ
The issues of organizational changes that the courts of appellate instance have undergone, as well as the content of the norms of economic procedural legislation, which enshrine the features of appellate proceedings. The peculiarities of appellate proceedings as an independent stage of economic liti...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Автори: | , |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Ukrainian |
| Опубліковано: |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
2021
|
| Онлайн доступ: | https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1018 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Economics and Law |
Репозитарії
Economics and Law| id |
oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-1018 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Economics and Law |
| baseUrl_str |
|
| datestamp_date |
2021-04-29T19:58:22Z |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
Ukrainian |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Shcherbyna, V.S. Bodnar, V.V. |
| spellingShingle |
Shcherbyna, V.S. Bodnar, V.V. ДЕЯКІ АСПЕКТИ АПЕЛЯЦІЙНОГО ПРОВАДЖЕННЯ В ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ |
| author_facet |
Shcherbyna, V.S. Bodnar, V.V. |
| author_sort |
Shcherbyna, V.S. |
| title |
ДЕЯКІ АСПЕКТИ АПЕЛЯЦІЙНОГО ПРОВАДЖЕННЯ В ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ |
| title_short |
ДЕЯКІ АСПЕКТИ АПЕЛЯЦІЙНОГО ПРОВАДЖЕННЯ В ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ |
| title_full |
ДЕЯКІ АСПЕКТИ АПЕЛЯЦІЙНОГО ПРОВАДЖЕННЯ В ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ |
| title_fullStr |
ДЕЯКІ АСПЕКТИ АПЕЛЯЦІЙНОГО ПРОВАДЖЕННЯ В ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ |
| title_full_unstemmed |
ДЕЯКІ АСПЕКТИ АПЕЛЯЦІЙНОГО ПРОВАДЖЕННЯ В ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ |
| title_sort |
деякі аспекти апеляційного провадження в господарському судочинстві |
| title_alt |
SOME ASPECTS OF THE APPEAL IN ECONOMIC JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS |
| description |
The issues of organizational changes that the courts of appellate instance have undergone, as well as the content of the norms of economic procedural legislation, which enshrine the features of appellate proceedings. The peculiarities of appellate proceedings as an independent stage of economic litigation are considered, which include the following: a) an appeal is filed against a decision of a court of first instance that has not entered into force; b) review of court decisions on appeal is carried out by the courts of appeal; c) the right to appeal has the participants, as well as persons who did not participate in the case, if the court has decided on their rights, interests and (or) responsibilities; d) the appeal is filed directly with the court of appeal; e) the subject of review of the case by the court of appellate instance is the verification of the legality and validity of the decision of the court of first instance; f) the limits of review of the case in the court of appeal, as a rule, are limited by the arguments and requirements of the appeal; g) in the court of appellate instance cases are reviewed according to the rules of consideration of cases in the order of simplified claim proceedings, taking into account the features provided by the Code. It is proposed in order to avoid (reduce) cases of unfounded filing of appeals to supplement Art. 254 Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine norm on the grounds of appeal of court decisions such as defined in Part 2 of Art. 287 of the Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine on the grounds of cassation appeal. It is noted that the current version of the Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine does not contain rules that would determine what procedural actions and within what period the appellate court should take to recover the case from the court of first instance, and during what period the court of first instance should consider the case her appellate court. Arguments are made against the use by courts of the so-called "procedural analogy" in cases. Other proposals are being made to improve the current procedural legislation.
REFERENCES1. Praktyka zakonotvorennia 01. Pravyla oformlennia proektiv zakoniv ta osnovni vymohy zakonodavchoi tekhniky (Metodychni rekomendatsii). Red. ta uporiad. Kryzhanivskyi V.P. Kyiv: FOP Moskalenko O.M., 2014. 44 p. URL: http://eef.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Rules_Web.pdf [in Ukrainian].2. Instruktsiia z dilovodstva v mistsevykh ta apeliatsiinykh sudakh Ukrainy: zatverdzhena nakazom Derzhavnoi su dovoi administratsii Ukrainy vid 20.08.2019 No. 814. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0814750-19#Text [in Ukrainian].3. Ukhvala Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 18.11.2019 u spravi No. 664/4673/14-ts. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85804990 [in Ukrainian].4. Ukhvala Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 21.02.2019 u spravi No. 336/4232/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80330508 [in Ukrainian].5. Ukhvala Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 02.12.2019 u spravi No. 910/7023/19. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86103936 [in Ukrainian].6. Ukhvala Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid15.04.2019 u spravi No. 903/922/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81171466 [in Ukrainian].7. Ukhvala Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 20.11.2019 u spravi No. 215/911/19 (administratyvne provadzhennia No. K/9901/32096/19). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85774534 [in Ukrainian].8. Luspenyk D.D. Protsesualna analohiia v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi: de-yure ta de-fakto (postanovka problemy). Advokat. 2006. No. 2. P. 12-17 [in Ukrainian].9. Karnaukh T.M. Problemy zastosuvannia pravovoi analohii u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy. Naukovi zapysky. 2010. Vol. 103. Yurydychni nauky. P. 106-109 [in Ukrainian].10. Drozdovych N. Protsesualna analohiia: samostiinyi pryntsyp kryminalnoho provadzhennia chy element zakonnosti. Slovo Natsionalnoi shkoly suddiv Ukrainy. 2019. No. 3(28). P. 113-126 [in Ukrainian].11. Turovets O.V. Deiaki aspekty zastosuvannia protsesualnoi analohii u hospodarskomu sudochynstvi. V kn.: Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy: materialy Mizhnar. nauk. konf. prof.-vykl. ta aspirant. skladu. Nats. un-t "Odes'ka yurydychna academia", Pivd. rehion. tsentr NAPrN Ukrainy. Odesa: Feniks, 2014. Vol. 1. P. 468-470 [in Ukrai nian]. |
| publisher |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1018 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT shcherbynavs someaspectsoftheappealineconomicjudicialproceedings AT bodnarvv someaspectsoftheappealineconomicjudicialproceedings AT shcherbynavs deâkíaspektiapelâcíjnogoprovadžennâvgospodarsʹkomusudočinství AT bodnarvv deâkíaspektiapelâcíjnogoprovadžennâvgospodarsʹkomusudočinství |
| first_indexed |
2025-09-24T17:23:18Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-09-24T17:23:18Z |
| _version_ |
1850411488565526528 |
| spelling |
oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-10182021-04-29T19:58:22Z SOME ASPECTS OF THE APPEAL IN ECONOMIC JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS ДЕЯКІ АСПЕКТИ АПЕЛЯЦІЙНОГО ПРОВАДЖЕННЯ В ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ Shcherbyna, V.S. Bodnar, V.V. The issues of organizational changes that the courts of appellate instance have undergone, as well as the content of the norms of economic procedural legislation, which enshrine the features of appellate proceedings. The peculiarities of appellate proceedings as an independent stage of economic litigation are considered, which include the following: a) an appeal is filed against a decision of a court of first instance that has not entered into force; b) review of court decisions on appeal is carried out by the courts of appeal; c) the right to appeal has the participants, as well as persons who did not participate in the case, if the court has decided on their rights, interests and (or) responsibilities; d) the appeal is filed directly with the court of appeal; e) the subject of review of the case by the court of appellate instance is the verification of the legality and validity of the decision of the court of first instance; f) the limits of review of the case in the court of appeal, as a rule, are limited by the arguments and requirements of the appeal; g) in the court of appellate instance cases are reviewed according to the rules of consideration of cases in the order of simplified claim proceedings, taking into account the features provided by the Code. It is proposed in order to avoid (reduce) cases of unfounded filing of appeals to supplement Art. 254 Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine norm on the grounds of appeal of court decisions such as defined in Part 2 of Art. 287 of the Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine on the grounds of cassation appeal. It is noted that the current version of the Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine does not contain rules that would determine what procedural actions and within what period the appellate court should take to recover the case from the court of first instance, and during what period the court of first instance should consider the case her appellate court. Arguments are made against the use by courts of the so-called "procedural analogy" in cases. Other proposals are being made to improve the current procedural legislation. REFERENCES1. Praktyka zakonotvorennia 01. Pravyla oformlennia proektiv zakoniv ta osnovni vymohy zakonodavchoi tekhniky (Metodychni rekomendatsii). Red. ta uporiad. Kryzhanivskyi V.P. Kyiv: FOP Moskalenko O.M., 2014. 44 p. URL: http://eef.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Rules_Web.pdf [in Ukrainian].2. Instruktsiia z dilovodstva v mistsevykh ta apeliatsiinykh sudakh Ukrainy: zatverdzhena nakazom Derzhavnoi su dovoi administratsii Ukrainy vid 20.08.2019 No. 814. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0814750-19#Text [in Ukrainian].3. Ukhvala Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 18.11.2019 u spravi No. 664/4673/14-ts. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85804990 [in Ukrainian].4. Ukhvala Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 21.02.2019 u spravi No. 336/4232/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80330508 [in Ukrainian].5. Ukhvala Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 02.12.2019 u spravi No. 910/7023/19. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86103936 [in Ukrainian].6. Ukhvala Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid15.04.2019 u spravi No. 903/922/17. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/81171466 [in Ukrainian].7. Ukhvala Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 20.11.2019 u spravi No. 215/911/19 (administratyvne provadzhennia No. K/9901/32096/19). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85774534 [in Ukrainian].8. Luspenyk D.D. Protsesualna analohiia v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi: de-yure ta de-fakto (postanovka problemy). Advokat. 2006. No. 2. P. 12-17 [in Ukrainian].9. Karnaukh T.M. Problemy zastosuvannia pravovoi analohii u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy. Naukovi zapysky. 2010. Vol. 103. Yurydychni nauky. P. 106-109 [in Ukrainian].10. Drozdovych N. Protsesualna analohiia: samostiinyi pryntsyp kryminalnoho provadzhennia chy element zakonnosti. Slovo Natsionalnoi shkoly suddiv Ukrainy. 2019. No. 3(28). P. 113-126 [in Ukrainian].11. Turovets O.V. Deiaki aspekty zastosuvannia protsesualnoi analohii u hospodarskomu sudochynstvi. V kn.: Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy: materialy Mizhnar. nauk. konf. prof.-vykl. ta aspirant. skladu. Nats. un-t "Odes'ka yurydychna academia", Pivd. rehion. tsentr NAPrN Ukrainy. Odesa: Feniks, 2014. Vol. 1. P. 468-470 [in Ukrai nian]. Досліджено питання щодо організаційних змін, що їх зазнали суди апеляційної ін- станції, а також зміст норм господарського процесуального законодавства, в яких закріплені особливості апеляційного провадження. Запропоновано з метою уникнення (зменшення) випадків безпідставного подання апеляційних скарг доповнити ст. 254 Господарського процесуального кодексу (далі ГПК) України нормою щодо підстав апеляційного оскарження судових рішень на зразок того, як це визначено ч. 2 ст. 287 ГПК України щодо підстав касаційного оскарження. Зазначено, що чинна редакція ГПК України не містить норм, що визначали б, які процесуальні дії і протягом якого строку має вчинити суд апеляційної інстанції щодо витребування справи з суду першої інстанції, а також протягом якого строку суд першої інстанції, який розглянув справу, має надіслати її суду апеляційної інстанції. Наведено аргументи проти застосування судами під час розгляду справ так званої процесуальної аналогії. Внесені й інші пропозиції щодо вдосконалення чинного процесуального законодавства. V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2021-04-15 Article Article application/pdf https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1018 10.15407/econlaw.2021.01.003 Economics and Law; No 1 (60) (2021): Economics and Law; 3 - 9 Экономика и право; No 1 (60) (2021): Economics and Law; 3 - 9 Економіка та право; No 1 (60) (2021): Economics and Law; 3 - 9 2523-4838 1681-6277 10.15407/econlaw.2021.01 uk https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1018/975 |