ПЕРЕГЛЯД УМОВ ДОГОВОРУ ПРО ПУБЛІЧНУ ЗАКУПІВЛЮ У ЗВ’ЯЗКУ З ІСТОТНОЮ ЗМІНОЮ ОБСТАВИН: ЕКОНОМІКО-ПРАВОВИЙ АСПЕКТ

• Datum: 2021
• Hauptverfasser: Zablodska, I.V., Kozhevnikova, V.O., Chernovska, S.M.
• Format: Artikel
• Sprache: Ukrainian
• Veröffentlicht: V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2021
• Online Zugang: https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1019
• Назва журналу: Economics and Law

The article analyses the grounds for revision of the terms of a contract in connection with a significant change of circumstances, as a way to protect civil rights and interests, the need for which may be associated with a certain extraordinary circumstance independent of the will, actions and desires of the parties. It is established that some of these unavoidable circumstances are extraordinary, and usually leads to the release of a participant in civil, commercial relations from non-property and property liability. It is proved that such unavoidable circumstances are able to appear in the contractual relationship as grounds for changing or terminating the obligation due to an objectively determined (permanent or temporary) impossibility of its fulfilment. It has been established that in the number of cases these factors, although in some cases significantly complicate, do not make it impossible for the participants to fulfil the obligation in general, and therefore have the most eventual nature for the interested party, creating only a subjective impossibility of fulfilment. The article defines the legislator’s guarantees for the protection of tender results, signs of materiality regarding the change of circumstances under the contract. It is argued that the concept of "significant change of circumstances" is an evaluative category, and the terms of the procurement contract may not change after its signing until the parties fulfil their obligations in full, except as provided by law. An example is considered — the Procurement Agreement concluded between the State Enterprise (Customer) and the private enterprise (Contractor), according to the terms of which the Contractor undertakes to perform in full the reconstruction of the filtration facility for draining oil products at the base fuel of lubricants warehouse materials at their own risk and with their own efforts and means, in accordance with the project documentation and deliver the work to the Customer within the period specified in the Agreement, and the Customer undertakes to accept and pay for quality work performed under the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement was amended in terms of changes in the composition of material and technical resources and the scope of work in connection with changes in technical (design) documentation and the use of better technology (equipment), based on documented objective circumstances that caused such changes, provided that such changes do not lead to an increase in the amount specified in the Procurement Agreement. REFERENCES1. Vikhrov O.P. Pravove rehuliuvannia derzhavnykh zakupivel yak instytut hospodarskoho prava. V kn.: Rol’ publichnoj sobstvennosti v obespechenii social’no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija Ukrainy (k 20-letiju osnovanija Instituta jekonomiko-pravovyh issledovanij NAN Ukrainy: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf.) (g. Doneck, 18 sentjabrja 2012 g.). In-t jekonomiko-pravovyh issledovanij NAN Ukrainy. Doneck: Jugo-Vostok, 2012. P. 84-93 [in Ukrainian].2. Vavzhenchuk S. Pidstavy, poriadok zminy ta rozirvannia dohovoru z ohliadu na istotnu zminu obstavyn. Pravo Ukrainy. 2009. No. 12. P. 191-195 [in Ukrainian].3. Vavzhenchuk S.Ia. Ukladennia dohovoru pro publichni zakupivli: dynamika zakonodavstva ta problemy pravozastosuvannia. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2019. No. 6. P. 6-11. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2019.6.01[in Ukrainian].4. Derevianko B.V., Smolyn H.V., Turkot O.A. Okremi shliakhy borotby iz porushenniamy u sferi publichnykh zakupivel. Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk. 2017. Iss. 5(20). P. 65-68. URL: http://repo.dli.donetsk.ua/handle/123456789/473 [in Ukrainian].5. Malolitneva V.K. Hospodarsko-pravovyi instytut publichnykh zakupivel. Kyiv: DU "Instytut ekonomiko-pravovykh doslidzhen imeni V.K. Mamutova NAN Ukrainy", 2020. 412 p. [in Ukrainian].6. Petrunenko Ya.V. Hospodarsko-pravovi osnovy derzhavnykh zakupivel v Ukraini: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. Nats. un-t "Odeska yurydychna akademiia". Odesa, 2013. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].7. Soshnykov A.O. Hospodarsko-pravove zabezpechennia publichnykh zakupivel: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. NAN Ukrainy, In-t ekon.-prav. dosl. im. V.K. Mamutova. Kyiv, 2019. 19 p. [in Ukrainian].8. Kurepina O.Iu. Pravove rehuliuvannia publichnoi zakupivli vuhillia dlia sotsialno znachushchykh obiektiv: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. NAN Ukrainy, In-t ekon.-prav. dosl. im. V.K. Mamutova. Kyiv, 2019. 18 p. [inUkrainian].9. Olefir A.O. Pravozastosuvannia problemy publichnykh zakupivel yak mekhanizmu investuvannia. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva. 2016. Vol. 1. Iss. 9. P. 12-16 [in Ukrainian].10. Olefir A.O. Problemy publichnykh zakupivel kriz pryzmu yevropeiskoho dosvidu. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva. 2017. Vol. 1. Iss. 11. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225- 6555.2017.11.89582 [in Ukrainian].11. Olefir A.O. Problemy zakhystu prav uchasnykiv publichnykh zakupivel. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva. 2018. Vol. 1. Iss. 13. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2018.13.120978 [in Ukrainian].12. Turchenko O.H. Pravove rehuliuvannia derzhavnykh zakupivel tovariv, robit ta posluh Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu (zblyzhennia zakonodavstva Ukrainy z pravom YeS): avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.11. In-t zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. Kyiv, 2008. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].13. Belianevych O.A. Hospodarske dohovirne pravo Ukrainy (teoretychni aspekty). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2006. 592 p. [in Ukrainian].14. Belianevych O.A. Principle of proportionality in Economic law. Economics and Law. 2019. No. 1 (52). P. 3-10. https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2019.01.003 [in Ukrainian].15. Milash V.S. Perspektyvy modernizatsii dohovirnykh pravovidnosyn u sferi hospodariuvannia. Khark. nats. un-t misk. hosp-va im. O.M. Beketova. Kharkiv: KhNUMH, 2014. 227 p. [in Ukrainian].16. Oliukha V.H. Tsyvilno-pravovyi dohovir: poniattia, funktsii ta systema: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi un-t im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv, 2003. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].17. Andreieva O. Osoblyvosti proiavu ryzyku u dohovirnomu pravi. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni T. Shevchenka. Seriia Iurydychni nauky. 2013. No. 95. P. 96-99 [in Ukrainian].18. Kanzafarova I.S. Zmina abo rozirvannia dohovoru u zviazku z istotnoiu zminoiu obstavyn. URL: http://dspace.onu.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/123456789/4210/1/S.%20320-323.pdf [in Ukrainian].19. Rodoman T.O. Do pytannia sudovoi praktyky zastosuvannia polozhen statti 652 Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy shchodo zminy umov dohovoru u zviazku z istotnoiu zminoiu obstavyn. Molodyi vchenyi. 2017. No. 5.1 (45.1). P. 108-115 [in Ukrainian].20. Illarionov A.Yu. Politiko-pravovye aspekty modernizacii hozjajstvennogo zakonodatel’stva. Chast’ pervaja. NAN Ukrainy. In-t jekonomiko-pravovyh issledovanij. Chernigov: Desna Poligraf, 2017. 160 p. [in Russian].21. Velykanova M.M. Ryzyky v tsyvilnomu pravi. Kyiv: Alerta, 2019. 378 p. [in Ukrainian].22. Sukha Yu.S. Pravyla pro uskladnennia (istotnu zminu obstavyn): porivnialnyi analiz polozhen DCFR,UNIDROIT ta tsyvilnoho zakonodavstva i sudovoi praktyky Ukrainy. Chasopys tsyvilistyky. 2016. Iss. 21. P. 82-87 [in Ukrainian].23. Pryntsypy mizhnarodnykh komertsiinykh dohovoriv UNIDRUA (UNIDROIT) 2010. URL: http://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/contracts/ principles2010/translations/blackletter2010-ukranian.pdf [in Ukrainian].24. Yoon Hie Jung. 4 Common Sources of Contract Risk and How to Eliminate Them. Business 2 Community. July 22, 2015. URL: http://www.business2community.com/sales-management/4-common-sources-contract-risk-eliminate-0127881125. Andreieva O. Tsyvilno-pravova kharakterystyka ryzyku istotnoi zminy obstavyn za dohovorom: poniattia ta praktychne znachennia. Yurydychna Ukraina. 2014. No. 3. P. 44-50 [in Ukrainian].26. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: u 2 t. Za red. O.V. Dzery. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2013. Vol. II. 1048 p. [in Ukrainian].27. Lyst Ministerstva ekonomichnoho rozvytku i torhivli Ukrainy vid 27.10.2016 No. 3302-06/34307-06 "Shchodo zminy istotnykh umov dohovoru pro zakupivliu". URL: https://www.city.kharkov.ua/assets/files/docs/zakypki/3302-06_34307-06_27.10.2016.pdf [in Ukrainian].28. DSTU B D.1.1-1:2013 "Pravyla vyznachennia vartosti budivnytstva": nakaz Ministerstva rehionalnoho rozvytku, budivnytstva ta zhytlovo-komunalnoho hospodarstva Ukrainy vid 05.07.2013 No. 293. URL: https://www.minregion.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/DSTU1.1-1_z_-Zm_noyu-1.pdf [in Ukrainian].29. Prymak V.D Rozirvannia dohovoru yak sposib tsyvilno-pravovoho zakhystu v kryzovykh umovakh. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2020. No. 5. P. 45-49. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.5.07 [in Ukrainian].