ОБМЕЖЕННЯ І МОЖЛИВОСТІ НАУКОВО-ОСВІТНЬОЇ ТА ІННОВАЦІЙНОЇ СФЕР УКРАЇНИ В КОНТЕКСТІ ФОРМУВАННЯ РЕГІОНАЛЬНИХ СМАРТ-СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЙ
European methodology Strategy for Smart Specialization is being implemented in Ukraine. The success of this process is largely predetermined by the readiness and ability of regional scientific and innovation systems to effectively interact within the country and abroad. The characteristics of these...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Ukrainian |
| Опубліковано: |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
2021
|
| Онлайн доступ: | https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1064 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Economics and Law |
Репозитарії
Economics and Law| id |
oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-1064 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Economics and Law |
| baseUrl_str |
|
| datestamp_date |
2021-12-28T17:21:00Z |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
Ukrainian |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Shvets, N.V. |
| spellingShingle |
Shvets, N.V. ОБМЕЖЕННЯ І МОЖЛИВОСТІ НАУКОВО-ОСВІТНЬОЇ ТА ІННОВАЦІЙНОЇ СФЕР УКРАЇНИ В КОНТЕКСТІ ФОРМУВАННЯ РЕГІОНАЛЬНИХ СМАРТ-СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЙ |
| author_facet |
Shvets, N.V. |
| author_sort |
Shvets, N.V. |
| title |
ОБМЕЖЕННЯ І МОЖЛИВОСТІ НАУКОВО-ОСВІТНЬОЇ ТА ІННОВАЦІЙНОЇ СФЕР УКРАЇНИ В КОНТЕКСТІ ФОРМУВАННЯ РЕГІОНАЛЬНИХ СМАРТ-СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЙ |
| title_short |
ОБМЕЖЕННЯ І МОЖЛИВОСТІ НАУКОВО-ОСВІТНЬОЇ ТА ІННОВАЦІЙНОЇ СФЕР УКРАЇНИ В КОНТЕКСТІ ФОРМУВАННЯ РЕГІОНАЛЬНИХ СМАРТ-СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЙ |
| title_full |
ОБМЕЖЕННЯ І МОЖЛИВОСТІ НАУКОВО-ОСВІТНЬОЇ ТА ІННОВАЦІЙНОЇ СФЕР УКРАЇНИ В КОНТЕКСТІ ФОРМУВАННЯ РЕГІОНАЛЬНИХ СМАРТ-СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЙ |
| title_fullStr |
ОБМЕЖЕННЯ І МОЖЛИВОСТІ НАУКОВО-ОСВІТНЬОЇ ТА ІННОВАЦІЙНОЇ СФЕР УКРАЇНИ В КОНТЕКСТІ ФОРМУВАННЯ РЕГІОНАЛЬНИХ СМАРТ-СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЙ |
| title_full_unstemmed |
ОБМЕЖЕННЯ І МОЖЛИВОСТІ НАУКОВО-ОСВІТНЬОЇ ТА ІННОВАЦІЙНОЇ СФЕР УКРАЇНИ В КОНТЕКСТІ ФОРМУВАННЯ РЕГІОНАЛЬНИХ СМАРТ-СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЙ |
| title_sort |
обмеження і можливості науково-освітньої та інноваційної сфер україни в контексті формування регіональних смарт-спеціалізацій |
| title_alt |
LIMITATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES OF SCIENTIFIC EDUCATIONAL AND INNOVATIVE SPHERES OF UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FORMATION OF REGIONAL SMART SPECIALIZATIONS |
| description |
European methodology Strategy for Smart Specialization is being implemented in Ukraine. The success of this process is largely predetermined by the readiness and ability of regional scientific and innovation systems to effectively interact within the country and abroad. The characteristics of these systems are determined by the general state of the national spheres of scientific educational and innovative activities. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to comprehensively assess the actual situation in the scientific educational and innovation spheres of Ukraine and identification of constraints and opportunities for establishing scientific technological and innovative cooperation with EU regions in the context of smart specialization of regional economies. To achieve this goal, the SWOT analysis method, which is a classic strategic management tool, was applied. Literature review of the application of this method and the specificity of the research object showed the need to clarify the methodology for performing the SWOT analysis. Three stages of this analysis have been proposed. At the first stage, the formation of groups of factors of the external and internal environment of the research object and selection to the list of the most significant of them was carried out. The second stage included an assessment of the selected factors using the experts' intuitive-logical analysis. A feature of the applied approach is that the experts determined a quantitative assessment for the factors of the internal environment and a qualitative one for external ones. The third stage involved the establishment of strategically important logical relationships between internal (Strengths and Weaknesses) and external (Opportunities and Threats) factors, which were discovered at the first stage of the SWOT analysis. Because of performing three stages of analysis using an expert survey, limitations and opportunities that affect the prospects for Ukraine's integration into the European Research Area were identified. It was concluded that it is necessary to design a comprehensive state policy for the development of the knowledge and innovation sphere, which will also contribute to the achievement of the goals of regional smart specialization.
REFERENCES
Foray D., Goddard J., Goenaga Beldarrain X., Landabaso M., McCann P., Morgan K., Nauwelaers C., Ortega-Argilés R. Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS 3). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012. May, 122 p.
Gianelle C., Kyriakou D., Cohen C., Przeor M. (eds). Implementing Smart Specialisation: A Handbook. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. 122 p. https://doi.org/10.2791/53569
Foray D. Smart specialisation: opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London-New York: Routledge. 2014. 104 р.
Antoniuk V.P. Stratehiia rozvytku vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy v konteksti vymoh do liudskoho kapitalu ta yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy. 2021. No. 1(40). P. 113-119. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2021.1(40).113-119 [in Ukrainian].
Matiushenko I.Iu., Khaustova V.Ie., Kniaziev S.I. Instytutsiina pidtrymka naukovo-innovatsiinoho rozvytku pry formuvanni yedynoho doslidnytskoho prostoru v krainakh YeS i Ukraini. Nauka ta innovatsii. 2017. No. 13(2). P. 5-26. https://doi.org/10.15407/scin13.02.005 [in Ukrainian].
Ivanov S.V., Liashenko V.I., Pidorycheva I.Iu. ta in. Ukraina v yevropeiskomu naukovo-osvitnomu ta innovatsiinomu prostori: kontseptsiia adaptatsii ta intehratsii v umovakh Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu z Yevropeiskym Soiuzom. Kyiv : NAN Ukrainy, In-t ekonomiky prom-sti. 2018. 331 p. [in Ukrainian].
Pidorycheva I.Iu. Ukraina u naukovo-tekhnolohichnomu ta innovatsiinomu prostorakh Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: problemy, pozytyvni zrushennia ta napriamy intehratsii. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. 2020. No. 2(60). P. 36-52. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-2(60)-36-52 [in Ukrainian].
Ivanov S.V., Antoniuk V.P. Yevropeiskyi doslidnytskyi prostir ta Ukraina: problemy i perspektyvy intehratsii. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. 2020. No. 3(61). P. 166-176. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-3(61)-166-176 [in Ukrainian].
Liashenko V., Pidorycheva I., Antoniuk V. European Research Area: comparative analysis of institutional prerequisites and integration approaches for Ukraine. Journal of European Economy. July-September 2020. Vol. 19. No. 3(74). Р. 456-481.
Pidorycheva I., Shevtsova H., Antonyuk V., Shvets N., Pchelynska H. A Conceptual Framework for Developing of Regional Innovation Ecosystems. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2020. Vol. 9(3). P. 626-640. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p626
Shevtsova H.Z., Shvets N.V. Zastosuvannia rehionalnoho benchmarkinhu v protsesi smartpriorytyzatsii. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy. 2021. No. 1(40). P. 47-59. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2021.1(40).47-59 [in Ukrainian].
Shvets N.V. Pytannia formuvannia khimichnoho klasteru v konteksti implementatsii pidkhodu smart-spetsializatsii u Dnipropetrovskii oblasti. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. 2020. No. 3(61). P. 70-79. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-3(61)-70-79 [in Ukrainian].
Jackson T. How to do a SWOT analysis [with examples]. Clear Point Strategy. URL: https://www.clearpointstrategy.com/swot-analysis-examples/
30 Best Practices SWOT ANALYSIS. I3E South East Europe TCP. 2011. URL: https://danube-inco.net/object/document/15886/attach/Best_Practices_SWOT.pdf
SWOT Analysis. Jagiellonian University in Krakow. Cracow. 2019. 154 p.
Al-Mubaraki H.M., Busler M. Innovation Systems in European Countries: A SWOT Analysis. European Journal of Business and Management. 2012. Vol. 4. No. 15. P. 106-118.
Bonfim J., Carvalho T., Corte-Rea M.J., et al. An Analysis of the Portuguese Research and Innovation System: Challenges, strengths and weaknesses towards 2020. FCT, 2020. 307 p.
SWOT Analysis on Clusters and Industry 4.0. INNO Industry. Interreg Europe. 2020. URL: https://www.interregeurope.eu/innoindustry/news/news-article/9852/swot-analysis-on-clusters-and-industry-4-0/
Vyshnevskyi O.S. Zahalna teoriia stratehuvannia: vid paradyhmy do praktyky vykorystannia: monohrafiia. NAN Ukrainy, In-t ekonomiky prom-sti. Kyiv, 2018. 156 p. [in Ukrainian].
Ivanov S.V., Antoniuk V.P., Liashenko V.I. Problemy vidtvorennia naukovykh kadriv staropromyslovykh rehioniv Donbasu i Prydniprovia dlia zabezpechennia yikh innovatsiinoi modernizatsii. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. 2020. No. 2(60). S. 200-208. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-2(60)-200-208 [in Ukrainian].
Soldak M.O. Rehionalna spetsyfika strukturnykh zrushen na rynku pratsi v konteksti intehratsii Ukrainy u hlobalnyi innovatsiinyi prostir. Administratyvno-terytorialni vs ekonomichno-prostorovi kordony rehioniv: materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (19-20 bereznia 2020 r.). K.: KNEU, 2020. P. 518-524 [in Ukrainian].
Zaloznova Yu.S., Petrova I.P. Rezhym mizhnarodno-publichno-pryvatnoho partnerstva v naukovo-tekhnichnii ta innovatsiinii sferakh u konteksti yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv. Upravlinnia ekonomikoiu: teoriia ta praktyka: zb. nauk. pr. K: IEP NANU, 2020. P. 19-31. https://doi.org/10.37405/2221-1187.2020.19-31 [in Ukrainian].
Omelyanenko V., Kudrina O., Shevtsova H., Prokopenko O., Petrenko V. ICT for Innovative Education and Science: Smart Environment for Networked Strategies. 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO). Opatija, Croatia, 2020. P. 727-730. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO48935.2020.9245133
|
| publisher |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1064 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT shvetsnv limitationsandopportunitiesofscientificeducationalandinnovativespheresofukraineinthecontextoftheformationofregionalsmartspecializations AT shvetsnv obmežennâímožlivostínaukovoosvítnʹoítaínnovacíjnoísferukraínivkontekstíformuvannâregíonalʹnihsmartspecíalízacíj |
| first_indexed |
2025-09-24T17:25:02Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-09-24T17:25:02Z |
| _version_ |
1844166999372988416 |
| spelling |
oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-10642021-12-28T17:21:00Z LIMITATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES OF SCIENTIFIC EDUCATIONAL AND INNOVATIVE SPHERES OF UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FORMATION OF REGIONAL SMART SPECIALIZATIONS ОБМЕЖЕННЯ І МОЖЛИВОСТІ НАУКОВО-ОСВІТНЬОЇ ТА ІННОВАЦІЙНОЇ СФЕР УКРАЇНИ В КОНТЕКСТІ ФОРМУВАННЯ РЕГІОНАЛЬНИХ СМАРТ-СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЙ Shvets, N.V. European methodology Strategy for Smart Specialization is being implemented in Ukraine. The success of this process is largely predetermined by the readiness and ability of regional scientific and innovation systems to effectively interact within the country and abroad. The characteristics of these systems are determined by the general state of the national spheres of scientific educational and innovative activities. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to comprehensively assess the actual situation in the scientific educational and innovation spheres of Ukraine and identification of constraints and opportunities for establishing scientific technological and innovative cooperation with EU regions in the context of smart specialization of regional economies. To achieve this goal, the SWOT analysis method, which is a classic strategic management tool, was applied. Literature review of the application of this method and the specificity of the research object showed the need to clarify the methodology for performing the SWOT analysis. Three stages of this analysis have been proposed. At the first stage, the formation of groups of factors of the external and internal environment of the research object and selection to the list of the most significant of them was carried out. The second stage included an assessment of the selected factors using the experts' intuitive-logical analysis. A feature of the applied approach is that the experts determined a quantitative assessment for the factors of the internal environment and a qualitative one for external ones. The third stage involved the establishment of strategically important logical relationships between internal (Strengths and Weaknesses) and external (Opportunities and Threats) factors, which were discovered at the first stage of the SWOT analysis. Because of performing three stages of analysis using an expert survey, limitations and opportunities that affect the prospects for Ukraine's integration into the European Research Area were identified. It was concluded that it is necessary to design a comprehensive state policy for the development of the knowledge and innovation sphere, which will also contribute to the achievement of the goals of regional smart specialization. REFERENCES Foray D., Goddard J., Goenaga Beldarrain X., Landabaso M., McCann P., Morgan K., Nauwelaers C., Ortega-Argilés R. Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS 3). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012. May, 122 p. Gianelle C., Kyriakou D., Cohen C., Przeor M. (eds). Implementing Smart Specialisation: A Handbook. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. 122 p. https://doi.org/10.2791/53569 Foray D. Smart specialisation: opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London-New York: Routledge. 2014. 104 р. Antoniuk V.P. Stratehiia rozvytku vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy v konteksti vymoh do liudskoho kapitalu ta yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy. 2021. No. 1(40). P. 113-119. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2021.1(40).113-119 [in Ukrainian]. Matiushenko I.Iu., Khaustova V.Ie., Kniaziev S.I. Instytutsiina pidtrymka naukovo-innovatsiinoho rozvytku pry formuvanni yedynoho doslidnytskoho prostoru v krainakh YeS i Ukraini. Nauka ta innovatsii. 2017. No. 13(2). P. 5-26. https://doi.org/10.15407/scin13.02.005 [in Ukrainian]. Ivanov S.V., Liashenko V.I., Pidorycheva I.Iu. ta in. Ukraina v yevropeiskomu naukovo-osvitnomu ta innovatsiinomu prostori: kontseptsiia adaptatsii ta intehratsii v umovakh Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu z Yevropeiskym Soiuzom. Kyiv : NAN Ukrainy, In-t ekonomiky prom-sti. 2018. 331 p. [in Ukrainian]. Pidorycheva I.Iu. Ukraina u naukovo-tekhnolohichnomu ta innovatsiinomu prostorakh Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: problemy, pozytyvni zrushennia ta napriamy intehratsii. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. 2020. No. 2(60). P. 36-52. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-2(60)-36-52 [in Ukrainian]. Ivanov S.V., Antoniuk V.P. Yevropeiskyi doslidnytskyi prostir ta Ukraina: problemy i perspektyvy intehratsii. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. 2020. No. 3(61). P. 166-176. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-3(61)-166-176 [in Ukrainian]. Liashenko V., Pidorycheva I., Antoniuk V. European Research Area: comparative analysis of institutional prerequisites and integration approaches for Ukraine. Journal of European Economy. July-September 2020. Vol. 19. No. 3(74). Р. 456-481. Pidorycheva I., Shevtsova H., Antonyuk V., Shvets N., Pchelynska H. A Conceptual Framework for Developing of Regional Innovation Ecosystems. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2020. Vol. 9(3). P. 626-640. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p626 Shevtsova H.Z., Shvets N.V. Zastosuvannia rehionalnoho benchmarkinhu v protsesi smartpriorytyzatsii. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy. 2021. No. 1(40). P. 47-59. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2021.1(40).47-59 [in Ukrainian]. Shvets N.V. Pytannia formuvannia khimichnoho klasteru v konteksti implementatsii pidkhodu smart-spetsializatsii u Dnipropetrovskii oblasti. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. 2020. No. 3(61). P. 70-79. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-3(61)-70-79 [in Ukrainian]. Jackson T. How to do a SWOT analysis [with examples]. Clear Point Strategy. URL: https://www.clearpointstrategy.com/swot-analysis-examples/ 30 Best Practices SWOT ANALYSIS. I3E South East Europe TCP. 2011. URL: https://danube-inco.net/object/document/15886/attach/Best_Practices_SWOT.pdf SWOT Analysis. Jagiellonian University in Krakow. Cracow. 2019. 154 p. Al-Mubaraki H.M., Busler M. Innovation Systems in European Countries: A SWOT Analysis. European Journal of Business and Management. 2012. Vol. 4. No. 15. P. 106-118. Bonfim J., Carvalho T., Corte-Rea M.J., et al. An Analysis of the Portuguese Research and Innovation System: Challenges, strengths and weaknesses towards 2020. FCT, 2020. 307 p. SWOT Analysis on Clusters and Industry 4.0. INNO Industry. Interreg Europe. 2020. URL: https://www.interregeurope.eu/innoindustry/news/news-article/9852/swot-analysis-on-clusters-and-industry-4-0/ Vyshnevskyi O.S. Zahalna teoriia stratehuvannia: vid paradyhmy do praktyky vykorystannia: monohrafiia. NAN Ukrainy, In-t ekonomiky prom-sti. Kyiv, 2018. 156 p. [in Ukrainian]. Ivanov S.V., Antoniuk V.P., Liashenko V.I. Problemy vidtvorennia naukovykh kadriv staropromyslovykh rehioniv Donbasu i Prydniprovia dlia zabezpechennia yikh innovatsiinoi modernizatsii. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. 2020. No. 2(60). S. 200-208. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-2(60)-200-208 [in Ukrainian]. Soldak M.O. Rehionalna spetsyfika strukturnykh zrushen na rynku pratsi v konteksti intehratsii Ukrainy u hlobalnyi innovatsiinyi prostir. Administratyvno-terytorialni vs ekonomichno-prostorovi kordony rehioniv: materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (19-20 bereznia 2020 r.). K.: KNEU, 2020. P. 518-524 [in Ukrainian]. Zaloznova Yu.S., Petrova I.P. Rezhym mizhnarodno-publichno-pryvatnoho partnerstva v naukovo-tekhnichnii ta innovatsiinii sferakh u konteksti yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv. Upravlinnia ekonomikoiu: teoriia ta praktyka: zb. nauk. pr. K: IEP NANU, 2020. P. 19-31. https://doi.org/10.37405/2221-1187.2020.19-31 [in Ukrainian]. Omelyanenko V., Kudrina O., Shevtsova H., Prokopenko O., Petrenko V. ICT for Innovative Education and Science: Smart Environment for Networked Strategies. 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO). Opatija, Croatia, 2020. P. 727-730. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO48935.2020.9245133 У статті представлено результати дослідження ситуації у науково-освітньої та інноваційної сферах України як передумови та чинника результативності регіональних смарт-спеціалізацій. З урахуванням особливостей обраного об’єкту дослідження уточнено методологію здійснення SWOT-аналізу та наведено результати його виконання. Шляхом експертного опитування ідентифіковано обмеження і можливості, які впливають на перспективи інтеграції України до Європейського дослідницького простору. Зроблено висновок про необхідність формування комплексної державної політики щодо розвитку сфери знань та інновацій, зокрема задля сприяння досягненню цілей регіональної смарт-спеціалізації. V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2021-12-06 Article Article application/pdf https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1064 10.15407/econlaw.2021.04.112 Economics and Law; No 4 (63) (2021): Economics and Law; 112 - 122 Экономика и право; No 4 (63) (2021): Economics and Law; 112 - 122 Економіка та право; No 4 (63) (2021): Economics and Law; 112 - 122 2523-4838 1681-6277 10.15407/econlaw.2021.04 uk https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1064/1025 |