ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ

ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ

The article examines experience of the Republic of Croatia in the development of de-occupied and affected territories post the armed conflict. The authors analyzed economic and legal conditions for the construction of the Croatian territories destroyed after the armed conflict and their financial su...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2022
Автори: Zablodska, I.V., Rohozian, Yu.S.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Ukrainian
Опубліковано: V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2022
Онлайн доступ:https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1091
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Economics and Law

Репозитарії

Economics and Law
id oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-1091
record_format ojs
institution Economics and Law
baseUrl_str
datestamp_date 2022-11-07T10:49:08Z
collection OJS
language Ukrainian
format Article
author Zablodska, I.V.
Rohozian, Yu.S.
spellingShingle Zablodska, I.V.
Rohozian, Yu.S.
ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ
author_facet Zablodska, I.V.
Rohozian, Yu.S.
author_sort Zablodska, I.V.
title ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ
title_short ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ
title_full ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ
title_fullStr ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ
title_full_unstemmed ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ
title_sort досвід розбудови територіі хорватії після збройного конфлікту: умови, пріоритети та інструментарій
title_alt THE EXPERIENCE OF THE TERRITORY DEVELOPMENT OF CROATIA POST THE ARMED CONFLICT: CONDITIONS, PRIORITIES AND TOOLS
description The article examines experience of the Republic of Croatia in the development of de-occupied and affected territories post the armed conflict. The authors analyzed economic and legal conditions for the construction of the Croatian territories destroyed after the armed conflict and their financial support by international donors through the creation of local economic development agencies, development and implementation of the local economic development concept in Croatia and adaptation of the legal framework to new economic goals. The priorities and four components of the strategic project of the social and economic recovery of Croatia have been determined. The first component of the project aimed at attracting investment in territorial communities, the second component devoted to the process of demining de-occupied territories, the third is the provision of consulting services to strengthen management potential, and the fourth component of the project aimed at supporting sub-projects in such areas as: social integration, economic revival and infrastructure for small communities in Croatia. The article demonstrates the economic and legal instruments of special state support for the development of the de-occupied territories of Croatia as well as the classification of territories requiring special state support. Emphasis placed on the expediency of state administration decentralization and the use of tax incentives, including real estate transfer tax, income tax received in the territory of special state supervision and corporate tax. In addition, noteworthy is the creation of three types of territories that received special state aid through income tax exemption or tax rate differentiation over time. Special state support was provided by providing housing to the population affected by the “Croatian War”. The conducted research made possible to establish the successes and shortcomings of the Croatian experience for the possible extrapolation of developments to Ukrainian realities. REFERENCES1. Zeng D.Z. The Past, Present, and Future of Special Economic Zones and Their Impact. Journal of International Economic Law. 2021. Vol. 24. Iss. 2. P. 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab0142. Chaisse J., Dimitropoulos G. Special Economic Zones in International Economic Law: Towards Unilateral Economic Law. Journal of International Economic Law. 2021. Vol. 24. Iss. 2. P. 229-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab0253. Frick S.A., Rodríguez-Pose A., Wong M.D. Toward Economically Dynamic Special Economic Zones in Emerging Countries. Economic Geography. 2019. Vol. 95. Iss. 1. P. 30–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.14677324. Kristensen K.M., Rejnor M.E. Reshenie problemy innovacij v biznese: kak sozdat' rastushhij biznes i uspeshno podderzhivat' ego rost. Per. s angl. E. Kalininoj. Moscow: Al'pina Biznes Buks, 2004. 273 p. [in Russian].5. Zubchenko L.A. Inostrannye investicii. Kharkiv: Knigodel, 2008. 160 p. [in Russian].6. Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni aspekty rozvytku pidpryiemnytskykh struktur v Ukraini ta sviti. Za zah. red. T. Hrynko. Dnipro: Vydavets Bila K.O., 2022. 400 p. [in Ukrainian].7. Karimov M., Il'ina D., Akramov A. Sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija svobodnyh jekonomicheskih zon v Respublike Uzbekistane: analiticheskij doklad. Institut prognozirovanija i makrojekonomicheskih issledovanij, UNDP: Tashkent, 2015. 63 p. [in Russian].8. Klim I.V. Svobodnaja jekonomicheskaja zona kak institut innovacionnogo razvitija jekonomiki. Vneshnejekonomicheskij vestnik. 2008. No. 4. P. 26-32 [in Russian].9. Boyenge S.J.P. ILO database on export processing zones (Revised): ILO Working Papers. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2007. URL: https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2007/107B09_80_engl.pdf10. Terytorii priorytetnoho rozvytku yak instrument vyrishennia problem v Donetskii i Luhanskii oblastiakh. Za zah. red. V.A. Ustymenka. NAN Ukraїny, DU “Instytut ekonomiko-pravovykh doslidzhen imeni V.K. MamutovaNAN Ukraїny”. Kyiv, 2021. 200 p. [in Ukrainian].11. Pavliuk A.P., Yehorova O.O., Markevych K.L. ta in. Industrialni parky v Ukraini: udoskonalennia polityky stymuliuvannia u konteksti svitovoho dosvidu. Kyiv: NISD, 2014. 64 p. [in Ukrainian].12. Zablodska I., Rohozian Yu., Litvinova I. Socio-economic efficiency of distribution the innovative diffusion in the different developed socio-economic systems/countries. Transformation of economy, finance and management in modern conditions: scientific monograph. Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing, 2022. P. 37-57. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-220-3-213. Zhuk P.V. Proekty zakonodavchykh aktiv shchodo zaprovadzhennia spetsialnoho rezhymu investytsiinoi diialnosti na hirskykh terytoriiakh, napravleni Holovi Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. DU “Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen im. M.I. Dolishnoho NAN Ukrainy”. Lviv, 2018. 10 p. [in Ukrainian].14. Chmyr O.S., Panchenko V.H., Husiev Yu.V., Pyla V.I. Vitchyzniana praktyka ta svitovyi dosvid SEZ i TPR. Nauk. red. O.S. Chmyr. Kyiv: Poster Prynt, 2013. 252 p. [in Ukrainian].15. Puhach V.H. Administratyvna reforma u Khorvatii: retrospektyvnyi analiz systemnykh zmin. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Derzhavne upravlinnia. 2019. Vol. 30 (69). No. 3. https://doi.org/10.32838/2663-6468/2019.3/05 [in Ukrainian].16. Borovets I. Osoblyvosti protsesu intehratsii Respubliky Khorvatiia do Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Mizhnarodni zviazky Ukrainy: naukovi poshuky i znakhidky. 2015. Iss. 24. P. 303-318 [in Ukrainian].17. Ivan A.L., Iov C.A. Croatia: Administrative Reform and Regional Development in the Context of EU Accession. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science. 2010. Vol. 31E. URL: https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/18218. Salzano C. Local economic development in the war-torn areas of Croatia: supporting the transition towards a participatory and decentralized market economy. Case Study-Croatia. ILO Local Economic Development Program. Geneva: ILO, 2002. URL: https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2002/482631.pdf19. Horopakha S. Republic of Croatia in the European Integration Process (1992-2005). Evropský politický a právní diskurz. 2018. Vol. 5. Is. 5. P. 28-34.20. Croatia — Social and Economic Recovery Project. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/998481468770749877/ Croatia-Social-and-Economic-Recovery-Project21. O područjima posebne državne skrbi: Zakon od 17. svibnja 1996. URL: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/full/1996_06_44_854.html [in Croatian].22. O područjima posebne državne skrbi: Zakon od 15. srpnja 2008. URL: https://www.zakon.hr/z/471/Zakon-opodru%C4%8Djima-posebne-dr%C5%BEavne-skrbi html [in Croatian].23. Pavliuk T. Peredvstupna dopomoha Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu dlia Khorvatii. Naukovi zapysky NaUOA. Seriia: Mizhnarodni vidnosyny. 2010. Iss. 2. P. 105-118 [in Ukrainian].
publisher V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
publishDate 2022
url https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1091
work_keys_str_mv AT zablodskaiv theexperienceoftheterritorydevelopmentofcroatiapostthearmedconflictconditionsprioritiesandtools
AT rohozianyus theexperienceoftheterritorydevelopmentofcroatiapostthearmedconflictconditionsprioritiesandtools
AT zablodskaiv dosvídrozbudoviteritorííhorvatíípíslâzbrojnogokonflíktuumovipríoritetitaínstrumentaríj
AT rohozianyus dosvídrozbudoviteritorííhorvatíípíslâzbrojnogokonflíktuumovipríoritetitaínstrumentaríj
AT zablodskaiv experienceoftheterritorydevelopmentofcroatiapostthearmedconflictconditionsprioritiesandtools
AT rohozianyus experienceoftheterritorydevelopmentofcroatiapostthearmedconflictconditionsprioritiesandtools
first_indexed 2025-12-02T15:41:54Z
last_indexed 2025-12-02T15:41:54Z
_version_ 1850411701968568320
spelling oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-10912022-11-07T10:49:08Z THE EXPERIENCE OF THE TERRITORY DEVELOPMENT OF CROATIA POST THE ARMED CONFLICT: CONDITIONS, PRIORITIES AND TOOLS ДОСВІД РОЗБУДОВИ ТЕРИТОРІІ ХОРВАТІЇ ПІСЛЯ ЗБРОЙНОГО КОНФЛІКТУ: УМОВИ, ПРІОРИТЕТИ ТА ІНСТРУМЕНТАРІЙ Zablodska, I.V. Rohozian, Yu.S. The article examines experience of the Republic of Croatia in the development of de-occupied and affected territories post the armed conflict. The authors analyzed economic and legal conditions for the construction of the Croatian territories destroyed after the armed conflict and their financial support by international donors through the creation of local economic development agencies, development and implementation of the local economic development concept in Croatia and adaptation of the legal framework to new economic goals. The priorities and four components of the strategic project of the social and economic recovery of Croatia have been determined. The first component of the project aimed at attracting investment in territorial communities, the second component devoted to the process of demining de-occupied territories, the third is the provision of consulting services to strengthen management potential, and the fourth component of the project aimed at supporting sub-projects in such areas as: social integration, economic revival and infrastructure for small communities in Croatia. The article demonstrates the economic and legal instruments of special state support for the development of the de-occupied territories of Croatia as well as the classification of territories requiring special state support. Emphasis placed on the expediency of state administration decentralization and the use of tax incentives, including real estate transfer tax, income tax received in the territory of special state supervision and corporate tax. In addition, noteworthy is the creation of three types of territories that received special state aid through income tax exemption or tax rate differentiation over time. Special state support was provided by providing housing to the population affected by the “Croatian War”. The conducted research made possible to establish the successes and shortcomings of the Croatian experience for the possible extrapolation of developments to Ukrainian realities. REFERENCES1. Zeng D.Z. The Past, Present, and Future of Special Economic Zones and Their Impact. Journal of International Economic Law. 2021. Vol. 24. Iss. 2. P. 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab0142. Chaisse J., Dimitropoulos G. Special Economic Zones in International Economic Law: Towards Unilateral Economic Law. Journal of International Economic Law. 2021. Vol. 24. Iss. 2. P. 229-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgab0253. Frick S.A., Rodríguez-Pose A., Wong M.D. Toward Economically Dynamic Special Economic Zones in Emerging Countries. Economic Geography. 2019. Vol. 95. Iss. 1. P. 30–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.14677324. Kristensen K.M., Rejnor M.E. Reshenie problemy innovacij v biznese: kak sozdat' rastushhij biznes i uspeshno podderzhivat' ego rost. Per. s angl. E. Kalininoj. Moscow: Al'pina Biznes Buks, 2004. 273 p. [in Russian].5. Zubchenko L.A. Inostrannye investicii. Kharkiv: Knigodel, 2008. 160 p. [in Russian].6. Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni aspekty rozvytku pidpryiemnytskykh struktur v Ukraini ta sviti. Za zah. red. T. Hrynko. Dnipro: Vydavets Bila K.O., 2022. 400 p. [in Ukrainian].7. Karimov M., Il'ina D., Akramov A. Sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija svobodnyh jekonomicheskih zon v Respublike Uzbekistane: analiticheskij doklad. Institut prognozirovanija i makrojekonomicheskih issledovanij, UNDP: Tashkent, 2015. 63 p. [in Russian].8. Klim I.V. Svobodnaja jekonomicheskaja zona kak institut innovacionnogo razvitija jekonomiki. Vneshnejekonomicheskij vestnik. 2008. No. 4. P. 26-32 [in Russian].9. Boyenge S.J.P. ILO database on export processing zones (Revised): ILO Working Papers. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2007. URL: https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2007/107B09_80_engl.pdf10. Terytorii priorytetnoho rozvytku yak instrument vyrishennia problem v Donetskii i Luhanskii oblastiakh. Za zah. red. V.A. Ustymenka. NAN Ukraїny, DU “Instytut ekonomiko-pravovykh doslidzhen imeni V.K. MamutovaNAN Ukraїny”. Kyiv, 2021. 200 p. [in Ukrainian].11. Pavliuk A.P., Yehorova O.O., Markevych K.L. ta in. Industrialni parky v Ukraini: udoskonalennia polityky stymuliuvannia u konteksti svitovoho dosvidu. Kyiv: NISD, 2014. 64 p. [in Ukrainian].12. Zablodska I., Rohozian Yu., Litvinova I. Socio-economic efficiency of distribution the innovative diffusion in the different developed socio-economic systems/countries. Transformation of economy, finance and management in modern conditions: scientific monograph. Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing, 2022. P. 37-57. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-220-3-213. Zhuk P.V. Proekty zakonodavchykh aktiv shchodo zaprovadzhennia spetsialnoho rezhymu investytsiinoi diialnosti na hirskykh terytoriiakh, napravleni Holovi Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. DU “Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen im. M.I. Dolishnoho NAN Ukrainy”. Lviv, 2018. 10 p. [in Ukrainian].14. Chmyr O.S., Panchenko V.H., Husiev Yu.V., Pyla V.I. Vitchyzniana praktyka ta svitovyi dosvid SEZ i TPR. Nauk. red. O.S. Chmyr. Kyiv: Poster Prynt, 2013. 252 p. [in Ukrainian].15. Puhach V.H. Administratyvna reforma u Khorvatii: retrospektyvnyi analiz systemnykh zmin. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Derzhavne upravlinnia. 2019. Vol. 30 (69). No. 3. https://doi.org/10.32838/2663-6468/2019.3/05 [in Ukrainian].16. Borovets I. Osoblyvosti protsesu intehratsii Respubliky Khorvatiia do Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Mizhnarodni zviazky Ukrainy: naukovi poshuky i znakhidky. 2015. Iss. 24. P. 303-318 [in Ukrainian].17. Ivan A.L., Iov C.A. Croatia: Administrative Reform and Regional Development in the Context of EU Accession. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science. 2010. Vol. 31E. URL: https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/18218. Salzano C. Local economic development in the war-torn areas of Croatia: supporting the transition towards a participatory and decentralized market economy. Case Study-Croatia. ILO Local Economic Development Program. Geneva: ILO, 2002. URL: https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2002/482631.pdf19. Horopakha S. Republic of Croatia in the European Integration Process (1992-2005). Evropský politický a právní diskurz. 2018. Vol. 5. Is. 5. P. 28-34.20. Croatia — Social and Economic Recovery Project. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/998481468770749877/ Croatia-Social-and-Economic-Recovery-Project21. O područjima posebne državne skrbi: Zakon od 17. svibnja 1996. URL: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/full/1996_06_44_854.html [in Croatian].22. O područjima posebne državne skrbi: Zakon od 15. srpnja 2008. URL: https://www.zakon.hr/z/471/Zakon-opodru%C4%8Djima-posebne-dr%C5%BEavne-skrbi html [in Croatian].23. Pavliuk T. Peredvstupna dopomoha Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu dlia Khorvatii. Naukovi zapysky NaUOA. Seriia: Mizhnarodni vidnosyny. 2010. Iss. 2. P. 105-118 [in Ukrainian]. Досліджено досвід Республіки Хорватія щодо розбудови деокупованих територій після збройного конфлікту. Проаналізовано економічні та правові умови відновлення постраждалих від збройного конфлікту територій, визначено пріоритети та компоненти стратегічного проєкту соціального й економічного відновлення Хорватії, а також економіко-правові інструменти державної підтримки розбудови деокупованих територій. Виділено важливість створення субпроєктів у сферах соціальної інтеграції, економічного відродження й інфраструктури для малих громад Хорватії. Уточнено класифікацію територій, які потребують особливої державної підтримки. Зроблено наголос на доцільності проведення децентралізації державного управління та використання податкових стимулів. V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2022-10-19 Article Article application/pdf https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1091 10.15407/econlaw.2022.03.072 Economics and Law; No 3 (66) (2022): Economics and Law; 72 - 84 Экономика и право; No 3 (66) (2022): Economics and Law; 72 - 84 Економіка та право; No 3 (66) (2022): Economics and Law; 72 - 84 2523-4838 1681-6277 10.15407/econlaw.2022.03 uk https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/1091/1050

Схожі ресурси