ОБ’ЄКТОЗДАТНІСТЬ ПРАВ ЗА ДОКУМЕНТАМИ ДОЗВІЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРУ І ТЕОРІЯ ПРАВА ВЛАСНОСТІ
Question about potentiality of the recognition rights providing by permissive documentsas objects of ownership (in legal theory and legislation) is started to investigate in the article. Author analyzes the experience of Germany and situation with ability for appropriation of material rights. Charac...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2017 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Ukrainian |
| Опубліковано: |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
2017
|
| Онлайн доступ: | https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/16 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Economics and Law |
Репозитарії
Economics and Law| id |
oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-16 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Economics and Law |
| baseUrl_str |
|
| datestamp_date |
2019-08-05T11:00:13Z |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
Ukrainian |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Apanasenko, K.I. |
| spellingShingle |
Apanasenko, K.I. ОБ’ЄКТОЗДАТНІСТЬ ПРАВ ЗА ДОКУМЕНТАМИ ДОЗВІЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРУ І ТЕОРІЯ ПРАВА ВЛАСНОСТІ |
| author_facet |
Apanasenko, K.I. |
| author_sort |
Apanasenko, K.I. |
| title |
ОБ’ЄКТОЗДАТНІСТЬ ПРАВ ЗА ДОКУМЕНТАМИ ДОЗВІЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРУ І ТЕОРІЯ ПРАВА ВЛАСНОСТІ |
| title_short |
ОБ’ЄКТОЗДАТНІСТЬ ПРАВ ЗА ДОКУМЕНТАМИ ДОЗВІЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРУ І ТЕОРІЯ ПРАВА ВЛАСНОСТІ |
| title_full |
ОБ’ЄКТОЗДАТНІСТЬ ПРАВ ЗА ДОКУМЕНТАМИ ДОЗВІЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРУ І ТЕОРІЯ ПРАВА ВЛАСНОСТІ |
| title_fullStr |
ОБ’ЄКТОЗДАТНІСТЬ ПРАВ ЗА ДОКУМЕНТАМИ ДОЗВІЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРУ І ТЕОРІЯ ПРАВА ВЛАСНОСТІ |
| title_full_unstemmed |
ОБ’ЄКТОЗДАТНІСТЬ ПРАВ ЗА ДОКУМЕНТАМИ ДОЗВІЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРУ І ТЕОРІЯ ПРАВА ВЛАСНОСТІ |
| title_sort |
об’єктоздатність прав за документами дозвільного характеру і теорія права власності |
| title_alt |
OBJECTABILITY OF RIGHTS PROVIDING BY PERMISSIVE DOCUMENTS AND OWNERSHIP’S THEORY ОБЪЕКТОСПОСОБНОСТЬ ПРАВ, ОСНОВАННЫХ НА ДОКУМЕНТАХ РАЗРЕШИТЕЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРА, И ТЕОРИЯ ПРАВА СОБСТВЕННОСТИ |
| description |
Question about potentiality of the recognition rights providing by permissive documentsas objects of ownership (in legal theory and legislation) is started to investigate in the article. Author analyzes the experience of Germany and situation with ability for appropriation of material rights. Characteristics and peculiarities of rights providing by permissive do cuments that have potential for appropriation are defined in the work.
REFERENCES1. Shymon S.I. (2012),Pravo vlasnosti na maynovi prava: zamitky do naukovoyi dyskusiyi [Law of property on material rights: essays for scientific disscussion], Derzhava i pravo, vol. 57, pp. 318—323.2. Salatyuk N.M. (2010), Zarubizhnyy dosvid rehulyuvannya pryrodokorystuvannya ta okhoron ynavkolyshn’oho sere dovyshcha [Foreign experience of the regulation of nature’s using and protection of environment], Naukovi pratsi NUKhT, vol. 36, pp. 210-214.3. Broemel R. (2015), Concepts of economic freedoms in China and EU: a methodical approach, China — EU Law Journal, vol. 4, is. 1, pp. 1-9.4. Apanasenko K.I. (2015), Pravova pryroda prav z adokumentamy dozvil’noho kharakteru: postanovka pytannya [The legal nature of rights providing by permissive documents: problem’s definition], Visnyk Kyyivs’koho natsional’noho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriya “Yurydychninauky”, vol. 2 (101), pp. 56—64.5. Shymon S.I. (2014), Majnovi prava yak ob’yekty cyvilnyh pravovidnosyn (teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty) [Material rights as objects of civil legal relations (theoretical and practical aspects)], PhD. diss., Civil law and civil process; family law; international private law; National academy of prosecutor’s office of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine6. Gus A.V. (2015), Nematerialni aktyvy: gospodarsko-pravovyi aspekt [Non-material actives: economic law aspect], AUTDOR-SHARK, Uzhgorod, Ukraine.7. Yavors’ka O. (2011), Maynovi prava yak ob’yekty tsyvil’noho oborotu [Material rights as objects of civil turnover], Visnyk L’vivs’koho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Seriyayuryd., vol. 53, pp. 225—231.8. Tsyvil’nepravoUkrayiny. Zahal’nachastyna: pidruchnyk / Za red. O.V. Dzery, N.S. Kuznyetsovoyi, R.A.Maydanyka [Civil law of Ukraine. Common part: textbook], 2010, Kyiv, Ukraine.9. Shymon S.I. (2012), Maynoviprava v konteksti suchasnykh kontseptsiy prava vlasnosti v tsyvilistytsi [Material rights in a context of contemporary concepts of property in civil law science], Chasopys Kyyivs’koho universytetu prava, vol. 2, pp. 192-195.10. Shymon S.I. (2011), Ponyattya maynovykh prav v konteksti Konventsiyi pro zakhyst prav lyudyny y osnovopolozhnyk hsvobod [The concept of material rights in a context of Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms], Universytets’ki naukovi zapysky, vol. 3, pp. 228-235.11. Apanasenko K.I. (2015), Dozvil’nimekhanizmy u sferi hospodars’koyi diyal’nosti ta okhorona prav spozhyvachiv [Pemissivemechanisms in a sphere of economic work and a defense of consumer’s rights] // Zakhyst prav spozhyvachiv u suchasnykh umovakh: materialy naukovo-praktychnoho seminaru [The protection of consumer’s rights in con temporary conditions], Chernihiv, Ukraine.12. Schrцder M. (2015), Property protection of public licenses and permits, China — EU Law Journal, vol. 4, is. 1, pp. 105-120.13. Shtober Rol’f (2008), Hozjajstvenno-administrativnoe pravo. Osnovy i problemy. Mirovaja jekonomika i vnutrennij rynok [Economic administrative law.The base and problems. World economic and internal market], VoltersKluver, Moscow, Russia.14. Broemel R. (2015), Fundamental rights and fundamental freedoms framing market activities, China — EU Law Journal, vol. 4, is. 1, pp. 11-32.15. Starzheneckij V.V. (2004),Rossija i Sovet Evropy: pravo sobstvennosti [Russia and Council of Europe: law of property], Moscow, Russia.16. Grazhdanskoe i torgovoe pravo zarubezhnyh gosudarstv: uchebnik: v 2-h t. / otv.red. E.A. Vasil’ev, A.S. Komarov [Civil and trade law of foreign states: textbook], 2006, Moscow, Russia.17. Shupins’ka O.V. (2005), Realizaciya yevropejs’kyh standartiv u sferi prava vlasnosti v procesi yevropejs’koyi integraciyi Ukrayiny [Realization of European standards in a sphere of the right of property in a process of European integration of Ukraine], vol. 2, pp. 94-98.18. Galov V.V., Zinchenko S.A. (2003), Sobstvennost’ i proizvodnye veshhnye prava: teorija i praktika [Property and derivative thing’s rights: theory and practice], SКАGS, Postov-na-Donu, Russia.19. Shershenevich G.F. (1995), Obshhaja teorija prava [Common theory of law], vol. 2, Мoscow, Russia.20. Gambarov Yu.S. (1911), Kurs grazhdanskogo prava [Course of civil law], Sankt-Peterburg, Russia.21. Mejer D.I. (1997), Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian civil law], part 1, Мoscow, Russia.22. Ioffe O.S. (1958), Sovetskoe grazhdansko epravo. Kurs lekcij. Obshhaja chast’ [Soviet civil law.Course of lections. Common part], Leningrad, USSR.23. Agarkov M.M. (1940), Objazatel’stvo po sovetskomu grazhdan skomu pravu [Obligations in Soviet civil law], Мoscow, Russia.24. Tuktarov Yu.E. (2003), Imushchestvennye prava kak obiekty grazhdansko-pravovogo oborota [Material rights as objects of civil law turnover] // Aktualny eproblemy grazhdan skogo prava [Actual problems of civil law], vol. 6, NORMA, Moscow, Russia, pp. 101—136.25. Rybalkin V.O., Laznya I.V. (2000), Teoriya vlasnosti [Theory of property], Logos, Kyiv, Ukraine.26. Domashenko M.V., Rubanyk V.Ye. (2002), Vlasnist’ i pravovlasnosti: Narysy z istoriyi, filosofiyi, teoriyi i praktyky rehulyuvannya vidnosynvlasnosti v Ukrayini [Property and law of property: essays about a history, a philosophy, a theory and a practice of the regulation of property’s relations in Ukraine], Fakt, Kharkiv, Ukraine.27. Shymon S.I. (2011), Peredannya tovaru, fikcijna tradyciya ta pravova fikciya u pravovidnosynah z kupivli-prodazhu majnovyhprav [Rights’ transfer, fiction’s tradition and legal fiction in the legal relations of purchase and sale of material rights], Derzhava i pravo, vol. 54, pp. 317—322.28. Savat’e R. (1940), Teorija objazatel’stv, juridicheskij i jekonomicheski jocherk [Theory of obligations, juridical and economic essay], Progress, Мoscow, Russia.29. Drobnickij O.G. (1967), Mir ozhivshih predmetov. Problema cennosti i marksistskaja filosofija [World of animated items.The problem of values and Marx’ philosophy], Politizdat, Мoscow, Russia.30. Kant I. (1965), Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti [Foun dations of moral’s metaphysics], vol. 4, Мysl’, Мoscow, Russia. |
| publisher |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/16 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT apanasenkoki objectabilityofrightsprovidingbypermissivedocumentsandownershipstheory AT apanasenkoki obʺektosposobnostʹpravosnovannyhnadokumentahrazrešitelʹnogoharakteraiteoriâpravasobstvennosti AT apanasenkoki obêktozdatnístʹpravzadokumentamidozvílʹnogoharakteruíteoríâpravavlasností |
| first_indexed |
2025-09-24T17:23:08Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-09-24T17:23:08Z |
| _version_ |
1844166941170728960 |
| spelling |
oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-162019-08-05T11:00:13Z OBJECTABILITY OF RIGHTS PROVIDING BY PERMISSIVE DOCUMENTS AND OWNERSHIP’S THEORY ОБЪЕКТОСПОСОБНОСТЬ ПРАВ, ОСНОВАННЫХ НА ДОКУМЕНТАХ РАЗРЕШИТЕЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРА, И ТЕОРИЯ ПРАВА СОБСТВЕННОСТИ ОБ’ЄКТОЗДАТНІСТЬ ПРАВ ЗА ДОКУМЕНТАМИ ДОЗВІЛЬНОГО ХАРАКТЕРУ І ТЕОРІЯ ПРАВА ВЛАСНОСТІ Apanasenko, K.I. Question about potentiality of the recognition rights providing by permissive documentsas objects of ownership (in legal theory and legislation) is started to investigate in the article. Author analyzes the experience of Germany and situation with ability for appropriation of material rights. Characteristics and peculiarities of rights providing by permissive do cuments that have potential for appropriation are defined in the work. REFERENCES1. Shymon S.I. (2012),Pravo vlasnosti na maynovi prava: zamitky do naukovoyi dyskusiyi [Law of property on material rights: essays for scientific disscussion], Derzhava i pravo, vol. 57, pp. 318—323.2. Salatyuk N.M. (2010), Zarubizhnyy dosvid rehulyuvannya pryrodokorystuvannya ta okhoron ynavkolyshn’oho sere dovyshcha [Foreign experience of the regulation of nature’s using and protection of environment], Naukovi pratsi NUKhT, vol. 36, pp. 210-214.3. Broemel R. (2015), Concepts of economic freedoms in China and EU: a methodical approach, China — EU Law Journal, vol. 4, is. 1, pp. 1-9.4. Apanasenko K.I. (2015), Pravova pryroda prav z adokumentamy dozvil’noho kharakteru: postanovka pytannya [The legal nature of rights providing by permissive documents: problem’s definition], Visnyk Kyyivs’koho natsional’noho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriya “Yurydychninauky”, vol. 2 (101), pp. 56—64.5. Shymon S.I. (2014), Majnovi prava yak ob’yekty cyvilnyh pravovidnosyn (teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty) [Material rights as objects of civil legal relations (theoretical and practical aspects)], PhD. diss., Civil law and civil process; family law; international private law; National academy of prosecutor’s office of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine6. Gus A.V. (2015), Nematerialni aktyvy: gospodarsko-pravovyi aspekt [Non-material actives: economic law aspect], AUTDOR-SHARK, Uzhgorod, Ukraine.7. Yavors’ka O. (2011), Maynovi prava yak ob’yekty tsyvil’noho oborotu [Material rights as objects of civil turnover], Visnyk L’vivs’koho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Seriyayuryd., vol. 53, pp. 225—231.8. Tsyvil’nepravoUkrayiny. Zahal’nachastyna: pidruchnyk / Za red. O.V. Dzery, N.S. Kuznyetsovoyi, R.A.Maydanyka [Civil law of Ukraine. Common part: textbook], 2010, Kyiv, Ukraine.9. Shymon S.I. (2012), Maynoviprava v konteksti suchasnykh kontseptsiy prava vlasnosti v tsyvilistytsi [Material rights in a context of contemporary concepts of property in civil law science], Chasopys Kyyivs’koho universytetu prava, vol. 2, pp. 192-195.10. Shymon S.I. (2011), Ponyattya maynovykh prav v konteksti Konventsiyi pro zakhyst prav lyudyny y osnovopolozhnyk hsvobod [The concept of material rights in a context of Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms], Universytets’ki naukovi zapysky, vol. 3, pp. 228-235.11. Apanasenko K.I. (2015), Dozvil’nimekhanizmy u sferi hospodars’koyi diyal’nosti ta okhorona prav spozhyvachiv [Pemissivemechanisms in a sphere of economic work and a defense of consumer’s rights] // Zakhyst prav spozhyvachiv u suchasnykh umovakh: materialy naukovo-praktychnoho seminaru [The protection of consumer’s rights in con temporary conditions], Chernihiv, Ukraine.12. Schrцder M. (2015), Property protection of public licenses and permits, China — EU Law Journal, vol. 4, is. 1, pp. 105-120.13. Shtober Rol’f (2008), Hozjajstvenno-administrativnoe pravo. Osnovy i problemy. Mirovaja jekonomika i vnutrennij rynok [Economic administrative law.The base and problems. World economic and internal market], VoltersKluver, Moscow, Russia.14. Broemel R. (2015), Fundamental rights and fundamental freedoms framing market activities, China — EU Law Journal, vol. 4, is. 1, pp. 11-32.15. Starzheneckij V.V. (2004),Rossija i Sovet Evropy: pravo sobstvennosti [Russia and Council of Europe: law of property], Moscow, Russia.16. Grazhdanskoe i torgovoe pravo zarubezhnyh gosudarstv: uchebnik: v 2-h t. / otv.red. E.A. Vasil’ev, A.S. Komarov [Civil and trade law of foreign states: textbook], 2006, Moscow, Russia.17. Shupins’ka O.V. (2005), Realizaciya yevropejs’kyh standartiv u sferi prava vlasnosti v procesi yevropejs’koyi integraciyi Ukrayiny [Realization of European standards in a sphere of the right of property in a process of European integration of Ukraine], vol. 2, pp. 94-98.18. Galov V.V., Zinchenko S.A. (2003), Sobstvennost’ i proizvodnye veshhnye prava: teorija i praktika [Property and derivative thing’s rights: theory and practice], SКАGS, Postov-na-Donu, Russia.19. Shershenevich G.F. (1995), Obshhaja teorija prava [Common theory of law], vol. 2, Мoscow, Russia.20. Gambarov Yu.S. (1911), Kurs grazhdanskogo prava [Course of civil law], Sankt-Peterburg, Russia.21. Mejer D.I. (1997), Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian civil law], part 1, Мoscow, Russia.22. Ioffe O.S. (1958), Sovetskoe grazhdansko epravo. Kurs lekcij. Obshhaja chast’ [Soviet civil law.Course of lections. Common part], Leningrad, USSR.23. Agarkov M.M. (1940), Objazatel’stvo po sovetskomu grazhdan skomu pravu [Obligations in Soviet civil law], Мoscow, Russia.24. Tuktarov Yu.E. (2003), Imushchestvennye prava kak obiekty grazhdansko-pravovogo oborota [Material rights as objects of civil law turnover] // Aktualny eproblemy grazhdan skogo prava [Actual problems of civil law], vol. 6, NORMA, Moscow, Russia, pp. 101—136.25. Rybalkin V.O., Laznya I.V. (2000), Teoriya vlasnosti [Theory of property], Logos, Kyiv, Ukraine.26. Domashenko M.V., Rubanyk V.Ye. (2002), Vlasnist’ i pravovlasnosti: Narysy z istoriyi, filosofiyi, teoriyi i praktyky rehulyuvannya vidnosynvlasnosti v Ukrayini [Property and law of property: essays about a history, a philosophy, a theory and a practice of the regulation of property’s relations in Ukraine], Fakt, Kharkiv, Ukraine.27. Shymon S.I. (2011), Peredannya tovaru, fikcijna tradyciya ta pravova fikciya u pravovidnosynah z kupivli-prodazhu majnovyhprav [Rights’ transfer, fiction’s tradition and legal fiction in the legal relations of purchase and sale of material rights], Derzhava i pravo, vol. 54, pp. 317—322.28. Savat’e R. (1940), Teorija objazatel’stv, juridicheskij i jekonomicheski jocherk [Theory of obligations, juridical and economic essay], Progress, Мoscow, Russia.29. Drobnickij O.G. (1967), Mir ozhivshih predmetov. Problema cennosti i marksistskaja filosofija [World of animated items.The problem of values and Marx’ philosophy], Politizdat, Мoscow, Russia.30. Kant I. (1965), Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti [Foun dations of moral’s metaphysics], vol. 4, Мysl’, Мoscow, Russia. Этой статьей начато исследование вопроса о возможности признания в качестве объектов права собственности прав, основанных на документах разрешительного характера (как в правовой теории, так и законодательстве). Проанализирован соответствующий опыт Германии и ситуация с возможностью присвоением имущественных прав. В работе определены характеристики и особенности объектоспособных прав, базирующихся на разрешительны. Цією статтею розпочато дослідження питання про можливість визнання як об’єктів права власності прав за документами дозвільного характеру (як у правовій теорії, так і в законодавстві). Проаналізовано відповідний досвід Німеччини та ситуацію з можливістю привласнення майнових прав, визначено характеристики й особливості об’єктоздатних прав за дозвільними документами. V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2017-08-30 Article Article application/pdf https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/16 10.15407/econlaw.2017.01.017 Economics and Law; No 1 (46) (2017): Economics and Law; 17 - 27 Экономика и право; No 1 (46) (2017): Economics and Law; 17 - 27 Економіка та право; No 1 (46) (2017): Economics and Law; 17 - 27 2523-4838 1681-6277 10.15407/econlaw.2017.01 uk https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/16/12 |