ПРОЦЕСУАЛЬНІ ТРУДНОЩІ ЗУСТРІЧНИХ ПОЗОВІВ
The study analyzes normative provision for a counterclaim as one of the procedural means of the respondent consisting both in simultaneous satisfaction of own requirements to the plaintiff and in protection against the primary claim. Substantial failings and blanks in the regulation of the countercl...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2010 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Ukrainian |
| Опубліковано: |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
2010
|
| Онлайн доступ: | https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/565 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Economics and Law |
Репозитарії
Economics and Law| Резюме: | The study analyzes normative provision for a counterclaim as one of the procedural means of the respondent consisting both in simultaneous satisfaction of own requirements to the plaintiff and in protection against the primary claim. Substantial failings and blanks in the regulation of the counterclaim in relation to the court’s proceedings for the adoption and consideration of the counterclaim are revealed. The ways to solve them are offered. The signs which indicate to the complication of the economic process when using a counterclaim are described. |
|---|