СУДОВА ПРАВОТВОРЧІСТЬ У ПИТАННЯХ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОЇ ЮРИСДИКЦІЇ
The article is devoted to the powers and restraints of the Supreme Court in the adjustment of judicial jurisdiction. Judicial jurisdiction should be distinguished from judicial competence, since the latter is a generic concept that includes all the powers of the court (including the settlem...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2019 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Ukrainian |
| Опубліковано: |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
2019
|
| Онлайн доступ: | https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/944 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Economics and Law |
Репозитарії
Economics and Law| id |
oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-944 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Economics and Law |
| baseUrl_str |
|
| datestamp_date |
2019-09-23T07:38:31Z |
| collection |
OJS |
| language |
Ukrainian |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Khudenko, O.O. |
| spellingShingle |
Khudenko, O.O. СУДОВА ПРАВОТВОРЧІСТЬ У ПИТАННЯХ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОЇ ЮРИСДИКЦІЇ |
| author_facet |
Khudenko, O.O. |
| author_sort |
Khudenko, O.O. |
| title |
СУДОВА ПРАВОТВОРЧІСТЬ У ПИТАННЯХ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОЇ ЮРИСДИКЦІЇ |
| title_short |
СУДОВА ПРАВОТВОРЧІСТЬ У ПИТАННЯХ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОЇ ЮРИСДИКЦІЇ |
| title_full |
СУДОВА ПРАВОТВОРЧІСТЬ У ПИТАННЯХ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОЇ ЮРИСДИКЦІЇ |
| title_fullStr |
СУДОВА ПРАВОТВОРЧІСТЬ У ПИТАННЯХ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОЇ ЮРИСДИКЦІЇ |
| title_full_unstemmed |
СУДОВА ПРАВОТВОРЧІСТЬ У ПИТАННЯХ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОЇ ЮРИСДИКЦІЇ |
| title_sort |
судова правотворчість у питаннях господарської юрисдикції |
| title_alt |
JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING IN THE ISSUES OF ECONOMIC JURISDICTION СУДЕБНОЕ ПРАВОТВОРЧЕСТВО В ВОПРОСАХ ХОЗЯЙСТВЕННОЙ ЮРИСДИКЦИИ |
| description |
The article is devoted to the powers and restraints of the Supreme Court in the adjustment of judicial jurisdiction. Judicial jurisdiction should be distinguished from judicial competence, since the latter is a generic concept that includes all the powers of the court (including the settlement of a dispute involving a judge, etc.). Judicial jurisdiction in Ukraine is divided into constitutional and general. Within the general judicial jurisdiction, economic, administrative, civil and criminal jurisdiction is allocated. The Law of Ukraine dated 03.10.2017 No. 2147-VIII, which fully updated the procedural codes, was able not only to fill in some of the gaps and to overcome the long-standing contradictions in the delimitation of judicial jurisdiction, but also to create completely new ones. Instead, the newly created Supreme Court was empowered to formulate a consistent judicial practice, including jurisdiction issues. The question is whether he will be able to concentrate the consideration of economic disputes within the courts of economic jurisdiction in such a way that he does not replace the legislator and does not violate or ignore the applicable procedural rules. It is concluded that economic jurisdiction in cases not expressly provided by procedural law can be extended for separate categories (subcategories) of disputes by the Supreme Court. The starting point should be the subject criterion (in particular, the nature of the disputed legal relationship), and the precaution should be the observance of legally established principles of division of jurisdiction. The Supreme Court should not only assert that the economic disputes belong to the economic jurisdiction, but also state the reasons for their non-civil or non-administrative nature.
REFERENCES
Black’s Law Dictionary. Ed. by Bryan A. Garner. 9th ed. St. Paul: West, 2009. 1943 p.
Shevchuk S.V. Sudova pravotvorchist: svitovyi dosvid i perspektyvy v Ukraini. Kyiv: Referat, 2007. 640 p.
Komarov V.V. Novelizatsiia tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva ta zasady novoho Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. 2003. No. 2-3 (33-34). P. 467-482.
Pobirchenko I.H. Vybrane. Kyiv: Osvita Ukrainy, 2013. 544 p.
Rieznikova V.V. Zvuzhennia kola sprav, pidvidomchykh hospodarskym sudam Ukrainy: problema nadumana chy realna? Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia "Pravo". 2013. Iss. 22. Ch. 2. P. 59-75.
Rieznikova V.V. Pidvidomchist sprav hospodarskym sudam Ukrainy: problemy teorii ta praktyky. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky. 2014. No. 1 (99). P. 24-32.
|
| publisher |
V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/944 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT khudenkooo judiciallawmakingintheissuesofeconomicjurisdiction AT khudenkooo sudebnoepravotvorčestvovvoprosahhozâjstvennojûrisdikcii AT khudenkooo sudovapravotvorčístʹupitannâhgospodarsʹkoíûrisdikcíí |
| first_indexed |
2025-12-02T15:43:41Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-12-02T15:43:41Z |
| _version_ |
1850411814222823424 |
| spelling |
oai:ojs.economiclaw.kiev.ua:article-9442019-09-23T07:38:31Z JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING IN THE ISSUES OF ECONOMIC JURISDICTION СУДЕБНОЕ ПРАВОТВОРЧЕСТВО В ВОПРОСАХ ХОЗЯЙСТВЕННОЙ ЮРИСДИКЦИИ СУДОВА ПРАВОТВОРЧІСТЬ У ПИТАННЯХ ГОСПОДАРСЬКОЇ ЮРИСДИКЦІЇ Khudenko, O.O. The article is devoted to the powers and restraints of the Supreme Court in the adjustment of judicial jurisdiction. Judicial jurisdiction should be distinguished from judicial competence, since the latter is a generic concept that includes all the powers of the court (including the settlement of a dispute involving a judge, etc.). Judicial jurisdiction in Ukraine is divided into constitutional and general. Within the general judicial jurisdiction, economic, administrative, civil and criminal jurisdiction is allocated. The Law of Ukraine dated 03.10.2017 No. 2147-VIII, which fully updated the procedural codes, was able not only to fill in some of the gaps and to overcome the long-standing contradictions in the delimitation of judicial jurisdiction, but also to create completely new ones. Instead, the newly created Supreme Court was empowered to formulate a consistent judicial practice, including jurisdiction issues. The question is whether he will be able to concentrate the consideration of economic disputes within the courts of economic jurisdiction in such a way that he does not replace the legislator and does not violate or ignore the applicable procedural rules. It is concluded that economic jurisdiction in cases not expressly provided by procedural law can be extended for separate categories (subcategories) of disputes by the Supreme Court. The starting point should be the subject criterion (in particular, the nature of the disputed legal relationship), and the precaution should be the observance of legally established principles of division of jurisdiction. The Supreme Court should not only assert that the economic disputes belong to the economic jurisdiction, but also state the reasons for their non-civil or non-administrative nature. REFERENCES Black’s Law Dictionary. Ed. by Bryan A. Garner. 9th ed. St. Paul: West, 2009. 1943 p. Shevchuk S.V. Sudova pravotvorchist: svitovyi dosvid i perspektyvy v Ukraini. Kyiv: Referat, 2007. 640 p. Komarov V.V. Novelizatsiia tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva ta zasady novoho Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. 2003. No. 2-3 (33-34). P. 467-482. Pobirchenko I.H. Vybrane. Kyiv: Osvita Ukrainy, 2013. 544 p. Rieznikova V.V. Zvuzhennia kola sprav, pidvidomchykh hospodarskym sudam Ukrainy: problema nadumana chy realna? Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia "Pravo". 2013. Iss. 22. Ch. 2. P. 59-75. Rieznikova V.V. Pidvidomchist sprav hospodarskym sudam Ukrainy: problemy teorii ta praktyky. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky. 2014. No. 1 (99). P. 24-32. Рассмотрены полномочия и ограничения Верховного Суда в корректировке судебной юрисдикции. Установлено, что отправным для этого должен быть предметный критерий (в частности характер спорных правоотношений), а предохранителем — соблюдение законодательно установленных принципов распределения юрисдикции. Отмечено, что Верховный Суд должен не только утверждать принадлежность хозяйственных споров к хозяйственной юрисдикции, но и аргументировать причины их непринадлежности к гражданской или административной. Розглянуто повноваження й обмеження Верховного Суду в коригуванні судової юрисдикції. Встановлено, що відправним для цього має бути предметний критерій (зокрема характер спірних правовідносин), а запобіжником — дотримання законодавчо встановлених засад розподілу юрисдикції. Наголошено на тому, що Верховний Суд повинен не тільки стверджувати належність господарських спорів до господарської юрисдикції, а й аргументувати причини їхньої неналежності до цивільної або адміністративної. V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2019-09-12 Article Article application/pdf https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/944 10.15407/econlaw.2019.03.034 Economics and Law; No 3 (54) (2019): Economics and Law; 34 - 38 Экономика и право; No 3 (54) (2019): Economics and Law; 34 - 38 Економіка та право; No 3 (54) (2019): Economics and Law; 34 - 38 2523-4838 1681-6277 10.15407/econlaw.2019.03 uk https://economiclaw.kiev.ua/index.php/economiclaw/article/view/944/903 |