LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW

The lanthanide (Ln) series has been attracted so much attention not only for its physical properties but also for its applications in organic synthesis and biomedical engineering. In the lanthanide chemistry, lanthanide contraction is a crucial concept meaning the gradual decrease in ionic radii as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2023
Main Author: Noguchi, Daisuke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: V.I.Vernadsky Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry 2023
Online Access:https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/586
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Ukrainian Chemistry Journal
Download file: Pdf

Institution

Ukrainian Chemistry Journal
_version_ 1871465980848242688
author Noguchi, Daisuke
author_facet Noguchi, Daisuke
author_institution_txt_mv [ { "author": "Daisuke Noguchi", "institution": "Division of Education and Research Support, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, 1–14 Bunkyo-machi, 8528521Nagasaki, Japan" } ]
author_sort Noguchi, Daisuke
baseUrl_str https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2026-07-22T08:23:52Z
description The lanthanide (Ln) series has been attracted so much attention not only for its physical properties but also for its applications in organic synthesis and biomedical engineering. In the lanthanide chemistry, lanthanide contraction is a crucial concept meaning the gradual decrease in ionic radii as the atomic number of the Ln series increases. As a prominent chelator, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) has been well-known to give stable complexes with various metals including Ln ions, resulted in forming (EDTA−4H)4− anion by deprotonation; over 100 kinds of Ln-EDTA complexes have hitherto been synthesized and structurally characterized using X-ray crystallography. While the lanthanide contraction phenomenon has been extensively studied in certain complexes of Ln, systematization on the Ln-EDTA remains inadequate though the chelates of EDTA are commonly used. Thus, this study presents a comprehensive analysis based on the data from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC). In mononuclear EDTA complexes X[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O (X+ = NH4+and its analogues) systematic lanthanide contraction depending on their coordination number are presented except for a few cases. However, in the case of non-mononuclear complexes or coordination polymers, the compositions become more complicated, and a greater variation in atomic bond length occurs, which is unusual for the lanthanide contraction studies in previous research. These varieties are considered to be influenced by different types of counter-cations, inorganic anions, solvent molecules and bridging O atoms from another EDTA anions. This suggests the flexibility and versatility of EDTA as a ligand. Such findings in the Ln-EDTA complexes could potentially provide us further development of a novel function in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.33609/2708-129X.89.09.2023.14-34
first_indexed 2025-09-24T17:43:53Z
format Article
fulltext 14 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 UDC 541.49: 546.723 – 54-386 doi: 10.33609/2708-129X.89.09.2023.14-34 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW. Daisuke Noguchi Division of Education and Research Support, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, 1−14 Bunkyo-machi, 8528521 Nagasaki, Japan e-mail: a.chemist.noguchi.d@gmail.com The lanthanide (Ln) series has been attracted so much attention not only for its physical properties but also for its applications in organic synthesis and biomedical engineering. In the lanthanide chemistry, lanthanide contraction is a crucial concept meaning the gradual de- crease in ionic radii as the atomic number of the Ln series increases. As a prominent chelator, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) has been well-known to give stable complexes with various metals including Ln ions, resulted in forming (EDTA−4H)4− anion by deprotona- tion; over 100 kinds of Ln-EDTA complexes have hitherto been synthesized and structural- ly characterized using X-ray crystallography. While the lanthanide contraction phenomenon has been extensively studied in certain complexes of Ln, systematization on the Ln-EDTA re- mains inadequate though the chelates of EDTA are commonly used. Thus, this study presents a comprehensive analysis based on the data from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC). In mononuclear EDTA complexes X[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O (X+ = NH4 + and its analogues) systematic lanthanide contraction depending on their coordination number are presented except for a few cases. However, in the case of non-mononuclear complexes or coordination polymers, the compositions become more complicated, and a greater variation in atomic bond length occurs, which is unusual for the lanthanide contraction studies in previous research. These varieties are considered to be influenced by different types of coun- ter-cations, inorganic anions, solvent molecules and bridging O atoms from another EDTA anions. This suggests the flexibility and versatility of EDTA as a ligand. Such findings in the Ln-EDTA complexes could potentially provide us further development of a novel function in the future. Keywords: coordination compound, f-block, rare-earth element, polyaminocarboxylic acid. 15https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 INTRODUCTION. Lanthanides (Ln) have been the extensive subject aimed at elucidat- ing their characteristics, namely electronic, magnetic, and optical properties, besides other aspects such as applications in the catalysts of organic syntheses and the agents in biomedical engineering [1−3]. In lanthanide chemistry, a key concept called ‘lanthanide contraction’ refers to the gradual decrease in ionic radii as the atomic number of the lanthanide series in- creases [4−6]. The cases of lanthanide contrac- tion were first studied in simple binary com- pounds [7]. Subsequently, renewed interest led to further studies of several families of coor- dination compounds in the solid state, and it was found that lanthanide contraction reduces the coordination numbers for some complexes having rigid ligands [8−10]. Moreover, such knowledge of the lanthanide contraction in the well-characterized complexes has led to the de- velopment of a novel phenomenon, for example, ‘switching photochromism’ in coordination polymers [11]. Nevertheless, the series whose lanthanide contraction clarified doesn’t cover all the existing complexes with various ligands. As one of the most prominent chelators, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; see Figure 1) is of great interest not only in chemi- cal analysis, but also in the advancement of ma- terials science. One example of its potential ap- plications involves gas storage and separation in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [12]. This is due to its ability to form stable com- plexes with practically all metal ions, including trivalent lanthanides, where EDTA molecules are deprotonated to form a tetravalent anion; i.e., (EDTA−4H)4− [13−16]. So far, over one hundred EDTA complexes of lanthanide have been synthesized and cha racterized using X-ray crystallography [17]. Earlier studies have suggested evidence of the lanthanide contraction in a series of Ln-EDTA complexes with coordinated water molecu les [18−25]. However, despite the existence of more than one hundred various types of Ln-EDTA complexes with reported crystal structures [17], systematic demonstration of the distances between centered Ln ions and coordinated atoms, depending on the coordi- nation numbers, is yet to be presented. Fig. 1. A chemical structure of (EDTA−4H)4− representing the tetravalent anion where four hyd rogen atoms are deprotonated from EDTA mole- cule. As to the Ln-EDTA complexes, a systematic comprehension of the lanthanide contraction could be expected to provide us some addi- tional insights into lanthanide chemistry, in- fluenced by counter-cations, crystal solvents, crystal packing effects, and so on. Therefore, I report herein a comprehensive investigation into the lanthanide contraction of the com- plexes of Ln-EDTA based on the crystal data that is free available from the Cambridge Crys- tallographic Data Centre (CCDC). EXPERIMENT AND DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS. A total of 111 kinds of Ln- EDTA complexes were identified and summa- rized along with their respective coordination numbers (CN), excluding promethium (Pm), which was not examined due to its radioactivi- ty as usual, and thulium (Tm), the second-least [8−10]. Moreover, such knowledge of the lanthanide contraction in the well-characterized complexes has led to the development of a novel phenomenon, for example, ‘switching photochromism’ in coordination polymers [11]. Nevertheless, the series whose lanthanide contraction clarified doesn’t cover all the existing complexes with various ligands. As one of the most prominent chelators, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; see Figure 1) is of great interest not only in chemical analysis, but also in the advancement of materials science. One example of its potential applications involves gas storage and separation in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [12]. This is due to its ability to form stable complexes with practically all metal ions, including trivalent lanthanides, where EDTA molecules are deprotonated to form a tetravalent anion; i.e., (EDTA−4H)4− [13−16]. Fig. 1. A chemical structure of (EDTA−4H)4− representing the tetravalent anion where four hydrogen atoms are deprotonated from EDTA molecule. So far, over one hundred EDTA complexes of lanthanide have been synthesized and characterized using X-ray crystallography [17]. Earlier studies have suggested evidence of the lanthanide contraction in a series of Ln-EDTA complexes with coordinated water molecules [18−25]. However, despite the existence of more than one hundred various types of Ln-EDTA complexes with reported crystal structures [17], systematic demonstration of the distances between centered Ln ions and coordinated atoms, depending on the coordination numbers, is yet to be presented. As to the Ln-EDTA complexes, a systematic comprehension of the lanthanide contraction could be expected to provide us some additional insights into lanthanide chemistry, influenced by counter-cations, crystal solvents, crystal packing effects, and so on. Therefore, I report herein a comprehensive investigation into the lanthanide contraction of the complexes of Ln-EDTA based on the crystal data that is free available from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC). EXPERIMENT AND DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS. A total of 111 kinds of Ln-EDTA complexes were identified and summarized along with their respective coordination numbers (CN), excluding promethium (Pm), which was not examined due to its radioactivity as usual, and thulium (Tm), the second-least abundant of the lanthanides. Therefore, in the present article, I only deal with each EDTA complex of Ln; La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Yb and Lu, as per my previous work [26]. Some cif files deposited on CCDC couldn’t be opened (3D Structure Unavailable) by the crystal viewer software Mercury. Complexes could be classified into two categories in general terms: mononuclear complexes and non-mononuclear ones (= metal coordination polymers). In the latter, EDTA anions act as a bridging ligand between centered Ln cations. A typical mononuclear Ln-EDTA complex with three 16 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY abundant of the lanthanides. Therefore, in the present article, I only deal with each EDTA complex of Ln; La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Yb and Lu, as per my previous work [26]. Some cif files deposited on CCDC couldn’t be opened (3D Structure Unavailable) by the crystal viewer software Mercury. Complexes could be classified into two ca tegories in general terms: mononuclear com- plexes and non-mononuclear ones (= metal co- ordination polymers). In the latter, EDTA an- ions act as a bridging ligand between centered Ln cations. A typical mononuclear Ln-EDTA complex with three coordinated water mole- cules [27] were shown in Figure 2. Monomeric complexes with formulae X[Ln(EDTA−4H) (H2O)m]·nH2O, where X+  = NH4 +, MA+ (=  CH3NH3 +), N2H5 +, and Gu+ (=  C(NH2)3 +), with Ln = Ce−Nd, Sm−Er were hit by search in the CCDC; Gu2[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2] ClO4·6H2O (Ln = Er, Yb, and Lu) are also included. Hereafter, some abbreviations, ‘NH4-Er’ are used for NH4[Ln(EDTA−4H) (H2O)2]·5H2O, for example, in which EDTA anion and water molecules are omitted. Bond parameters for these isostructural compounds X[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O are listed in Table 1-5; d(Ln-N), d(Ln-OAc), and d(Ln-Ow) are mean bond distances between centered Ln atoms and corresponding coordinated atoms; N = nitrogen atoms in the ethylenediamine moiety of EDTA anions, OAc and Ow = oxygen atoms in -COO− and H2O, respectively. Fig. 2. An example of Ln-EDTA complexes with three coordinated water molecules: [Eu(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3] − moiety is demonstrated in the crystal of NH4[Eu(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·5H2O [27]; where Eu (red purple), O (red), N (blue), and C (gray). H atoms, NH4 + (counter cation), and crystalline water molecules uncoordinated to Eu3+ are omitted. coordinated water molecules [27] were shown in Figure 2. Monomeric complexes with formulae X[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, where X+ = NH4 +, MA+ (= CH3NH3 +), N2H5 +, and Gu+ (= C(NH2)3 +), with Ln = Ce−Nd, Sm−Er were hit by search in the CCDC; Gu2[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2]ClO4·6H2O (Ln = Er, Yb, and Lu) are also included. Hereafter, some abbreviations, ‘NH4-Er’ are used for NH4[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2]·5H2O, for example, in which EDTA anion and water molecules are omitted. Bond parameters for these isostructural compounds X[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O are listed in Table 1-5; d(Ln-N), d(Ln-OAc), and d(Ln-Ow) are mean bond distances between centered Ln atoms and corresponding coordinated atoms; N = nitrogen atoms in the ethylenediamine moiety of EDTA anions, OAc and Ow = oxygen atoms in -COO− and H2O, respectively. Fig. 2. An example of Ln-EDTA complexes with three coordinated water molecules: [Eu(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]− moiety is demonstrated in the crystal of NH4[Eu(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·5H2O [27]; where Eu (red purple), O (red), N (blue), and C (gray). H atoms, NH4 + (counter cation), and crystalline water molecules uncoordinated to Eu3+ are omitted. Table 1. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of NH4[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·5H2O (m = 3 except for the cases of m = 2 in both Er). The Eu and Ho have CN = 9, whereas the Er has CN = 8. NH4- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 63Eu 2.696 2.490 2.420 [27] 67Ho 2.644 2.422 2.365 [28] 68Er(1) 2.558 2.319 2.270 [29] 68Er(2) 2.543 2.316 2.278 [30] Table 2. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of MA[Gd(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·4H2O (MA = CH3NH3; CN = 9). Table 1. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of NH4[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·5H2O (m = 3 except for the cases of m = 2 in both Er). The Eu and Ho have CN = 9, whereas the Er has CN = 8. NH4- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 63Eu 2.696 2.490 2.420 [27] 67Ho 2.644 2.422 2.365 [28] 68Er(1) 2.558 2.319 2.270 [29] 68Er(2) 2.543 2.316 2.278 [30] 17https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 Table 2. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of MA[Gd(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·4H2O (MA = CH3NH3; CN = 9). MA- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 64Gd 2.678 2.492 2.412 [31] Table 3. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of N2H5[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·nH2O (n = 5 except for the cases of Ce has n = 4, and Eu has n = 3; all have CN = 9). N2H5- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 58Ce 2.731 2.554 2.471 [32] 59Pr 2.713 2.537 2.454 [33] 60Nd 2.702 2.523 2.440 [33] 62Sm 2.679 2.489 2.415 [33] 63Eu 2.692 2.498 2.419 [32] 64Gd 2.663 2.463 2.395 [34] 65Tb 2.654 2.452 2.385 [34] 66Dy 2.676 2.448 2.371 [35] Table 4 Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of Gu[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3] (Gu = C(NH2)3; all have CN = 9). Gu- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 60Nd 2.551 2.506 2.521 [36] 63Eu 2.696 2.661 2.675 [37] 64Gd 2.447 2.400 2.415 [25] Table 5. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of Gu2[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2]ClO4·6H2O (Gu = C(N-H2)3; all have CN = 8). Gu2- Ln-ClO4 Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 68Er 2.591 2.344 2.275 [38] 70Yb 2.577 2.322 2.254 [39] 71Lu 2.568 2.316 2.245 [25] 18 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY The atomic numbers vs. mean bond dis- tances (Å) of mononuclear Ln-EDTA com- plexes are demonstrated in Figure 3. The lan- thanide contraction phenomenon is obtained; mean bond distances are gradually reduced (Ce−Lu). The complexes of CN = 8 (Er−Lu) have even shorter ion radii than those of CN = 9 (Ce−Ho), possibly explained by reducing the steric repulsion between the ligands around the coordination sphere. Fig. 3. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-OAc), and d(Ln-Ow) vs. atomic numbers of mononuclear complexes of X[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, where X+ = NH4 +, MA+ (= CH3NH3 +), N2H5 +, and Gu+ (= C(NH2)3 +), in addition to Gu2[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2]ClO4·6H2O. From Ce to Ho, the complexes have 9-coordinate geometry (denoted as triangles), whereas from Er to Lu, CN = 8 (circules). are gradually reduced (Ce−Lu). The complexes of CN = 8 (Er−Lu) have even shorter ion radii than those of CN = 9 (Ce−Ho), possibly explained by reducing the steric repulsion between the ligands around the coordination sphere. Fig. 3. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-OAc), and d(Ln-Ow) vs. atomic numbers of mononuclear complexes of X[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, where X+ = NH4 +, MA+ (= CH3NH3 +), N2H5 +, and Gu+ (= C(NH2)3 +), in addition to Gu2[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2]ClO4·6H2O. From Ce to Ho, the complexes have 9-coordinate geometry (denoted as triangles), whereas from Er to Lu, CN = 8 (circules). Consequently, the mean bond distances of the complexes of M[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, where M = Na, K, and Cs, are shown in Table 6-8. As mentioned above, the abbreviation such as Na-La means Na[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·5H2O. These complexes M[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O are still thought to be mononuclear, because there are no bridged Ln ions present. Alkali metal ions, however, are bridged to Ln ions via oxygen atoms (Figure 4). All the Na-Ln complexes have CN = 9. Among the K-Ln complexes, only one K-Yb complex has 8-coordinate, and others have CN = 9. Cs-Sm and Cs-Gd have 9-coordinate geometry; on the contrary, Cs-Dy, Cs-Ho, and Cs-Yb have CN = 8. The mean bond lengths vs. atomic numbers of the Ln series (La–Yb, except for Pm and Tm) with Na, K, and Cs are shown in Figure 5. Table 6. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of Na[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O (m = 3, n = 5, except for the case of n = 3.25 in Dy(3). Na- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 57La 2.768 2.589 2.493 [24] Consequently, the mean bond distanc- es of the complexes of M[Ln(EDTA−4H) (H2O)m]·nH2O, where M = Na, K, and Cs, are shown in Table 6-8. As mentioned above, the abbreviation such as Na-La means Na[L- n(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·5H2O. These complexes M[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O are still tho ught to be mononuclear, because there are no bridged Ln ions present. Alkali metal ions, however, are bridged to Ln ions via oxygen atoms (Figure 4). All the Na-Ln complex- es have CN = 9. Among the K-Ln complex- es, only one K-Yb complex has 8-coordinate, and others have CN = 9. Cs-Sm and Cs-Gd have 9-coordinate geometry; on the contrary, Cs-Dy, Cs-Ho, and Cs-Yb have CN = 8. The mean bond lengths vs. atomic numbers of the Ln series (La–Yb, except for Pm and Tm) with Na, K, and Cs are shown in Figure 5. 19https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 Table 6. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of Na[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O (m = 3, n = 5, except for the case of n = 3.25 in Dy(3). Na- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 57La 2.768 2.589 2.493 [24] 58Ce 2.709 2.571 2.491 [40] 59Pr 2.714 2.536 2.458 [19] 60Nd(1) 2.700 2.535 2.451 [24] 60Nd(2) 2.696 2.521 2.454 [36] 62Sm(1) 2.673 2.499 2.423 [24] 62Sm(2) 2.667 2.494 2.421 [41] 62Sm(3) 2.614 2.466 2.381 [42] 63Eu(1) 2.675 2.495 2.411 [24] 63Eu(2) 2.665 2.480 2.410 [43] 64Gd(1) 2.651 2.472 2.399 [19] 64Gd(2) 2.653 2.469 2.400 [44] 65Tb 2.643 2.448 2.377 [43] 66Dy(1) 2.627 2.464 2.392 [18] 66Dy(2) 2.640 2.456 2.377 [43] 66Dy(3) 2.649 2.461 2.381 [45] 67Ho(1) 2.633 2.453 2.363 [22] 67Ho(2) 2.654 2.457 2.395 [46] 68Er 2.618 2.428 2.351 [47] Table 7. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of K[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O (m = 3, n = 5, except for the cases of m = 2 in Yb; n = 3.5 in Eu). K- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 60Nd 2.712 2.539 2.436 [23] 62Sm 2.692 2.503 2.412 [48] 63Eu 2.677 2.500 2.402 [49] 64Gd(1) 2.677 2.483 2.399 [50] 20 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY 64Gd(2) 2.719 2.553 2.464 [51] 65Tb 2.655 2.470 2.390 [52] 67Ho 2.617 2.446 2.367 [47] 70Yb 2.519 2.343 2.272 [53] Table 8. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of Cs[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·5H2O (m = 3, except for the cases of m = 2 in both Er). Cs- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) 62Sm 2.671 2.466 2.423 [47] 64Gd 2.654 2.434 2.400 [47] 66Dy 2.574 2.392 2.318 [47] 67Ho 2.584 2.378 2.314 [47] 70Yb 2.532 2.369 2.262 [18] Table 9. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystals of [Ln(EDTA−3H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, except for the case of H-Ce = [Cr(OH)6Mo6O18][Ce3(EDTA−3H)2(H2O)9]·13H2O (CN = 10). From La to Sm: m = 1, n = 0 (La & Ce, CN = 10; Nd & Sm, CN = 9); Gd to Dy(1): m = 0, n = 3; Dy(2) to Er; m = 0, n = 2 (CN = 8). H- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-OAc) inter intra 57La 2.849 2.655 2.726 2.524 [55] 58Ce 2.789 2.564 2.700 2.504 [56] 60Nd 2.776 2.552 2.453 2.452 [57] 62Sm 2.773 2.548 2.453 2.454 [58] 64Gd 2.626 - 2.354 2.353 [59] 66Dy(1) 2.626 - 2.355 2.354 [61] 66Dy(2) 2.604 - 2.328 2.325 [60] 67Ho 2.592 - 2.323 2.311 [62] 68Er 2.577 - 2.306 2.299 [63] Table 7. 21https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 Fig. 4. The crystal structures of mononuclear Na[La(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·5H2O [24], where La (red purple), Na (purple), O (red), N (blue), and C (gray). H atoms are not shown. Fig. 4. The crystal structures of mononuclear Na[La(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·5H2O [24], where La (red purple), Na (purple), O (red), N (blue), and C (gray). H atoms are not shown. Fig. 5. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-Ow), and d(Ln-OAc) vs. atomic numbers of mononuclear complexes of M[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, where M+ = Na+, K+, and Cs+. Although K-Yb, Cs-Dy, Cs-Ho, and Cs-Yb have CN = 8, the remaining complexes have CN = 9. The complex of Na-Sm(3) has slightly shorter bond distances than that of Na-Sm(1) and Fig. 4. The crystal structures of mononuclear Na[La(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]·5H2O [24], where La (red purple), Na (purple), O (red), N (blue), and C (gray). H atoms are not shown. Fig. 5. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-Ow), and d(Ln-OAc) vs. atomic numbers of mononuclear complexes of M[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, where M+ = Na+, K+, and Cs+. Although K-Yb, Cs-Dy, Cs-Ho, and Cs-Yb have CN = 8, the remaining complexes have CN = 9. The complex of Na-Sm(3) has slightly shorter bond distances than that of Na-Sm(1) and Fig. 5. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-Ow), and d(Ln-OAc) vs. atomic numbers of mononuclear complexes of M[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, where M+ = Na+, K+, and Cs+. Although K-Yb, Cs-Dy, Cs-Ho, and Cs-Yb have CN = 8, the remaining complexes have CN = 9. The complex of Na-Sm(3) has slightly short- er bond distances than that of Na-Sm(1) and Na-Sm(2). For example, does the amount of crystalline water molecules differ? Wang et al. (2010) reported an X-ray crystallography with its approximately consistent elemental analysis [42]; hence, a possibility of the different com- position would be incorrect. Conversely, as 22 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY to the case of the K-Gd(2) complex, the bond distances are irregularly longer compared with others. By Yang et al. (2002), X-ray crystallo graphy was the only method for its characteri zation (both elemental analysis and IR spect roscopy weren’t reported) [51]. It’s difficult to say what the deviation would mean, but by contrast, it should be wondered if the compo- sition is really accurate in the case of K-Gd(2). Between Dy and Er, complexes having CN = 8 and 9 are overlapping. The complex- es of Cs-Dy and Cs-Ho have CN = 8, whereas Na-Dy, Na-Ho, Na-Er, and K-Ho have CN = 9. Compared with 9-coordinate, 8-coordinate have significantly shorter distances. These facts seem to indicate that the geometry around the Ln atoms is influenced by the size and electro- static properties of the counter-cations accord- ing to Sakagami et al. (1999) [47]. However, these findings of the cases of the complexes having alkali metal ions (M+) are in contrast to those described for the cases of X+ (NH4 + and its analogues such as MA+, N2H5 +, and Gu+) as counter ions, because in Er, both NH4-Er and Gu2-Er-ClO4 in spite of having the same 8-co- ordinate geometry. By manifestation of these two things, as counter-cations, alkali metals could have strong perturbation through coor- dination bonding to the coordination sphere around the Ln ions than the cases having NH4 + and its analogues, not having coordi- nation bonding to the Ln ions by themselves. The mean bond distances are reduced from La to Yb. Fig. 6. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-Ow), d(Ln-OAc-intra), and d(Ln-OAc-intra) vs. atomic numbers of mononuclear complexes of [Ln(EDTA−3H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, except for the case of H-Ce = [Cr(OH)6Mo6O18][Ce3(EDTA−3H)2(H2O)9]·13H2O (CN = 10). Fig. 6. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-Ow), d(Ln-OAc-intra), and d(Ln-OAc-intra) vs. atomic numbers of mononuclear complexes of [Ln(EDTA−3H)(H2O)m]·nH2O, except for the case of H-Ce = [Cr(OH)6Mo6O18][Ce3(EDTA−3H)2(H2O)9]·13H2O (CN = 10). In the early study based upon the crystal structure of the H-La complex, its coordination number had been reported to be CN = 10 [38]. On the other hand, the recent study by Xiong et al. (2007) reported the CN as 9 [55]. In the present study, the two La3+ are considered to have both CN = 10, including two coordinated intermolecular -COO− groups. The bond lengths of two La-OAc-inter is 2.475 Å and 2.974 Å, respectively; the longer one being considered non-bonding because it is too long [55]. Among the H-Ln series, a question of the presence or absence of coordinated water molecules is of interest. In the case of the light rare earths (LRE) from La to Sm, the complexes exhibit coordinated water molecules, whereas the heavy rare earths (HRE) from Gd to Er do not. As these series of complexes lack counter-cations such as M+ or X+ (NH4 + and its analogues), the intermolecular distances between each H-Ln complex are shortened, resulting in the replacement of bridging -COO− groups instead of water molecules. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the complexes of HRE. Furthermore, the transition to CN = 8 is occurring from Gd that is earlier than in previously discussed monomeric complexes. This distinction would suggest that the H-Ln complexes should be differentiated from other monomeric one having alkali metal ions, ammonium ions and its analogues as counter-cations. Hereafter, the remaining complexes of Ln-EDTA with coordinated water molecules are discussed whose bond lengths are listed in Table 10. For the cases where Ln ions lacking coordination with water molecules are also incorporated, only the bond lengths of Ln ions with coordination bonds 23https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 Janicki & Mondry (2014) have summarized the monomeric [Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)n] − (n = 2, 3, 4) having counter-cations of H+, Na+, K+, Cs+, NH4 +, and Gu+, where the one having H+ was H[La(EDTA−4H)(H2O)4] [38]. But actu- ally, it is more appropriate to denote the com- plex H[La(EDTA−4H)] as [La(EDTA−3H)], since H+ is on one carboxylate group by Lind et al. (1965) [54]. Another problem by Janicki & Mondry (2014) is that the other Ln complex- es having (EDTA−3H)3− and water molecules as ligands weren’t discussed [38]. While anoth- er [Ln(EDTA−3H)] series with crystal struc- tures had been reported; not as monomeric complexes but as ones having bridged Ln ions by oxygen atoms described in Table 9 and Fi gure 6. Some [Ln(EDTA−3H)] are denoted as H3O[Ln(EDTA−4H)] in the original articles [61-63]. Since it should be the -COO− more basic than water molecules to receive H+, all compounds are unified as a category within a series of [Ln(EDTA−3H)] herein. In the early study based upon the crystal structure of the H-La complex, its coordina- tion number had been reported to be CN = 10 [38]. On the other hand, the recent study by Xiong et al. (2007) reported the CN as 9 [55]. In the present study, the two La3+ are conside red to have both CN = 10, including two co- ordinated intermolecular -COO− groups. The bond lengths of two La-OAc-inter is 2.475 Å and 2.974 Å, respectively; the longer one being con- sidered non-bonding because it is too long [55]. Among the H-Ln series, a question of the presence or absence of coordinated water mo lecules is of interest. In the case of the light rare earths (LRE) from La to Sm, the complexes exhibit coordinated water molecules, whereas the heavy rare earths (HRE) from Gd to Er do not. As these series of complexes lack coun- ter-cations such as M+ or X+ (NH4 + and its ana logues), the intermolecular distances between each H-Ln complex are shortened, resulting in the replacement of bridging -COO− groups in- stead of water molecules. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the complexes of HRE. Furthermore, the transition to CN = 8 is occur- ring from Gd that is earlier than in previously discussed monomeric complexes. This distinc- tion would suggest that the H-Ln complexes should be differentiated from other monomer- ic one having alkali metal ions, ammonium ions and its analogues as counter-cations. Hereafter, the remaining complexes of Ln-EDTA with coordinated water molecules are discussed whose bond lengths are listed in Table 10. For the cases where Ln ions lacking coordination with water molecules are also in- corporated, only the bond lengths of Ln ions with coordination bonds are demonstrated. The complexes have somewhat complicated chemical formulae as follow: La(1): [La5Cl2(EDTA−4H)3(H2O)18]nCln·8nH2O; La(2): [La2(SO4)(EDTA−4H)(H2O)3]n; La(3): K2(NH4)8[La(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2]2[La(cit−3H)(EDTA−4H)]2·22H2O (cit = citric acid); La(4): (H2en)[La(EDTA−4H)(H2O)]2·10H2O; La(5): [{(CH3)2N}2C13H8I]2[{La(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2}2]·4H2O; La(6): (NH4)5[La3(CO3)(EDTA−4H)3(H2O)3]·12H2O; La(7): K5[La3(CO3)(EDTA−4H)3(H2O)3]·13.5H2O; 24 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Ce: K5[Ce3(CO3)(EDTA−4H)3(H2O)3]·13.5H2O; Pr: H2(PhNHNH2)3[Pr2(EDTA−4H)2(H2O)4]·5H2O; Nd: [Nd2{o-C6H4(COO)2}(EDTA−4H)(H2O)2]·1.5H2O; Eu(1): Na[Eu8(EDTA−4H)6(H2O)22]ClO4·28H2O; Eu(2): Na[Eu9(EDTA−4H)6(H2O)27](ClO4)4·26H2O; Gd(1): Na[Gd8(EDTA−4H)6(H2O)22]ClO4·28H2O; Gd(2): Na[Gd9(EDTA−4H)6(H2O)27](ClO4)4·26H2O. Table 10. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystal compounds of the Ln-EDTA complexes that have coordinated water molecules. La(1) to La(5), Pr, and Nd have CN = 10; whereas the remaining complexes have CN = 9. H2O- Ln Bond length / Å Ref. d(Ln-N) d(Ln-Ow) d(Ln-O) inter intra 57La(1) 2.821 2.568 − 2.566 [64] 57La(2) 2.785 2.532 2.609 2.612 [64] 57La(3) 2.806 2.650 2.637 2.531 [48] 57La(4) 2.852 2.561 2.643 2.529 [65] 57La(5) 2.833 2.587 2.589 2.539 [66] 57La(6) 2.780 2.529 − 2.535 [67] 57La(7) 2.763 2.529 − 2.534 [67] 58Ce 2.736 2.534 − 2.507 [67] 59Pr 2.796 2.524 2.672 2.475 [68] 60Nd 2.765 2.504 2.615 2.466 [69] 63Eu(1) 2.682 2.497 2.417 2.406 [70] 63Eu(2) 2.680 2.495 2.416 2.409 [70] 64Gd(1) 2.675 2.477 2.401 2.396 [70] 64Gd(2) 2.668 2.483 2.428 2.416 [70] As displayed in Figure 7, these complexes with coordinated water molecules have CN = 10 (La−Nd), and CN = 9 (La−Gd). There is a large overlap between CN = 10 and 9 compared with the previous shown Ln-EDTA complexes. The cases of that the proportion of non-major components except for the lanthanide-cen- tered EDTA moieties within each complex is relatively large, it is probable that the coordina- tion numbers are strongly influenced. 25https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 Fig. 7. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-Ow), d(Ln-OAc-intra), and d(Ln-O-intra) vs. atomic numbers of the complicated remaining complexes of Ln-EDTA with coordinated water molecules. It should be noted that the O atoms in d(Ln-O-intra) are not necessarily belonging to the -COO− in adjacent EDTA moieties. 63Eu(1) 2.682 2.497 2.417 2.406 [70] 63Eu(2) 2.680 2.495 2.416 2.409 [70] 64Gd(1) 2.675 2.477 2.401 2.396 [70] 64Gd(2) 2.668 2.483 2.428 2.416 [70] As displayed in Figure 7, these complexes with coordinated water molecules have CN = 10 (La−Nd), and CN = 9 (La−Gd). There is a large overlap between CN = 10 and 9 compared with the previous shown Ln-EDTA complexes. The cases of that the proportion of non-major components except for the lanthanide-centered EDTA moieties within each complex is relatively large, it is probable that the coordination numbers are strongly influenced. Fig. 7. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-Ow), d(Ln-OAc-intra), and d(Ln-O-intra) vs. atomic numbers of the complicated remaining complexes of Ln-EDTA with coordinated water molecules. It should be noted that the O atoms in d(Ln-O-intra) are not necessarily belonging to the -COO− in adjacent EDTA moieties. Now that the last remaining series of Ln-EDTA complexes which do not have any coordinated water molecules are outlined as shown in Table 11 and 12. Here, bond parameters of the series without coordinated water molecules from Ln-EDTA complexes, which are depicted in Table 10, are also presented. As aforementioned, former studies indicated the lanthanide contraction of EDTA complexes using only some Ln-EDTA complexes with coordinated water molecules [18-25]. This means that a thorough examination of the lanthanide contraction in EDTA complexes, lacking coordinated water molecules, is yet to be carried out. Each bond distance is plotted against atomic Now that the last remaining series of Ln- EDTA complexes which do not have any coor- dinated water molecules are outlined as shown in Table 11 and 12. Here, bond parameters of the series without coordinated water molecules from Ln-EDTA complexes, which are depicted in Table 10, are also presented. As aforemen- tioned, former studies indicated the lanthanide contraction of EDTA complexes using only some Ln-EDTA complexes with coordinated water molecules [18-25]. This means that a thorough examination of the lanthanide con- traction in EDTA complexes, lacking coordi- nated water molecules, is yet to be carried out. Each bond distance is plotted against atomic number for the complexes without coordinat- ed water molecules in Figure 8. The chemical formulae for the variety of each compound are not provided here, however, in some com- plexes, hydroxide, nitrate, carbonate, peroxide, phosphite, oxalate, malonate, and citrate ions are coordinated in place of water molecules or the O atoms of the -COO− from the neighbor- ing EDTA anions. In particular, the difference in bond length surpasses any previous series, with some bond lengths even practically re- sembling those of Er complexes with CN = 8, despite the Ce complex having CN = 10; it is due to that Ce(4)−Ce(6) have tetravalence; Ce(IV) [75]. Another characteristic of this se- ries is the difference in the range of coordina- tion numbers. The Ln-EDTA complexes with coordinated water molecules have a CN = 10, which ranges from La to Nd (also overlapping 26 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY with CN = 9). Conversely, up to Eu, the CN in the Ln-EDTA complexes without coordinated water molecules increases to 10. This suggests that the coordination number of Ln-EDTA complexes can be significantly tunable while retaining the EDTA anions as the primary li- gands. Table 11. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystal compounds of the remaining LRE-EDTA complexes that have no coordinated water molecules; only Sm(1)-EDTA complexes has CN = 9, whereas others have CN = 10. LRE-EDTA Bond length / Å d(Ln-N) d(Ln-O) Ref. inter intra 57La(1) 2.813 2.563 2.588 [71] 57La(2) 2.785 2.563 2.611 [71] 57La(3) 2.802 2.562 2.609 [71] 57La(4) 2.746 2.515 2.657 [64] 57La(5) 2.808 2.568 2.596 [48] 57La(6) 2.803 2.566 2.601 [48] 57La(7) 2.822 2.566 2.650 [72] 57La(8) 2.830 2.573 2.630 [72] 57La(9) 2.771 2.559 2.625 [73] 57La(10) 2.803 2.568 2.593 [73] 57La(11) 2.767 2.556 2.613 [67] 57La(12) 2.768 2.541 2.626 [67] 57La(13) 2.785 2.572 2.581 [67] 58Ce(1) 2.720 2.418 2.342 [74] 58Ce(2) 2.795 2.543 2.568 [71] 58Ce(3) 2.782 2.543 2.595 [71] 58Ce(4) 2.562 2.494 2.317 [75] 58Ce(5) 2.590 2.484 2.316 [75] 58Ce(6) 2.712 2.408 2.331 [75] 58Ce(7) 2.763 2.535 2.597 [73] 58Ce(8) 2.788 2.548 2.578 [73] 58Ce(9) 2.764 2.553 2.566 [67] 58Ce(10) 2.757 2.523 2.618 [67] 62Sm(1) 2.442 2.660 2.432 [48] 62Sm(2) 2.771 2.491 2.482 [76] 27https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 Table 12. Average atomic bond lengths in the crystal compounds of the remaining HRE-EDTA complexes that have no coordinated water molecules; Eu(3’) have CN = 3, Eu(3), Gd(2), and Gd(4’) have CN = 9, others have CN = 8. HRE-EDTA Bond length / Å d(Ln-N) d(Ln-O) Ref. inter intra 63Eu(1) 2.748 2.597 2.611 [77] 63Eu(2) 2.793 2.556 2.569 [78] 63Eu(3) 2.755 2.467 2.388 [70] 63Eu(3’) 2.771 2.481 2.501 [70] 64Gd(1) 2.617 2.407 2.308 [79] 64Gd(2) 2.657 2.396 2.421 [79] 64Gd(3) 2.610 2.393 2.319 [79] 64Gd(4) 2.758 2.483 2.595 [79] 64Gd(4’) 2.796 2.434 2.559 [79] 68Er(1) 2.513 2.291 2.343 [80] 68Er(2) 2.574 7.432 2.329 [81] 70Yb(1) 2.553 2.282 2.306 [82] 70Yb(2) 2.539 2.274 2.303 [82] 70Yb(3) 2.533 2.272 2.299 [82] 70Yb(4) 2.541 2.276 2.294 [82] It is primarily the Ln-O bond lengths that exhibit the most variation, whereas the Ln-N bond lengths display comparatively little varia tion between them. Evidently, factors beyond the coordinating EDTA anion, such as distinc- tions in crystal packing due to the kind of co- ordinating other anions and non-coordinating moieties, occasionally have an impact on the atomic bond lengths. This would be because, in contrast to other rigid ligands, EDTA ani- ons are flexible. Nonetheless, it is undeniable that the overall trend towards the lanthanide contraction is obvious even in this series. From La to Yb, the average atomic bond lengths are decreasing. 28 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Fig. 8. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-O-inter), and d(Ln-OAc-intra) vs. atomic numbers of the remaining complexes of Ln-EDTA without coordinated water molecules. It should be noted that the O atoms in d(Ln-O-intra) are not necessarily belonging to -COO− in the neighbouring EDTA moieties. CONCLUSIONS. In order to achieve a com- prehensive understanding on the lanthanide contraction among the complexes of Ln-EDTA already reported individually, I searched and analyzed data on 111 kinds of crystal structures obtained from the CCDC. The finding indi- cates clear lanthanide contraction in the series of mononuclear Ln-EDTA complexes with co- ordinated water molecules having ammonium ions, its analogues, and alkali metals as coun- ter-cations. However, there is a tendency for greater variation in the average atomic bond lengths as the Ln-EDTA complexes became non-mononuclear or coordination polymers. This phenomenon is influenced by various types of counter-cations, including bridging another Ln ions coordinated to the O atoms of -COO− in neighboring EDTA anions, as well as factors beyond the coordination sphere. Such variation is uncommon in the studies of the lanthanide contraction of the complexes having rigid li gands previously reported. It is suggested that the EDTA anions have a versatility as ligands, which could provide a flexibility in the CN and atomic bond lengths in the lanthanide contrac- tion. This manuscript is a revised version of my preprint (doi: 10.51094/jxiv.560). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I apprecia te to the CCDC for providing crystal- lographic data free of charge. I would also like to acknowledge the fund par- tially received from the Research Grant of Nagasaki University for Global Health Research Collaboration (2023). Fig. 8. Mean atomic bond distances (Å) of d(Ln-N), d(Ln-O-inter), and d(Ln-OAc-intra) vs. atomic numbers of the remaining complexes of Ln-EDTA without coordinated water molecules. It should be noted that the O atoms in d(Ln-O-intra) are not necessarily belonging to -COO− in the neighbouring EDTA moieties. It is primarily the Ln-O bond lengths that exhibit the most variation, whereas the Ln-N bond lengths display comparatively little variation between them. Evidently, factors beyond the coordinating EDTA anion, such as distinctions in crystal packing due to the kind of coordinating other anions and non-coordinating moieties, occasionally have an impact on the atomic bond lengths. This would be because, in contrast to other rigid ligands, EDTA anions are flexible. Nonetheless, it is undeniable that the overall trend towards the lanthanide contraction is obvious even in this series. From La to Yb, the average atomic bond lengths are decreasing. CONCLUSIONS. In order to achieve a comprehensive understanding on the lanthanide contraction among the complexes of Ln-EDTA already reported individually, I searched and analyzed data on 111 kinds of crystal structures obtained from the CCDC. The finding indicates clear lanthanide contraction in the series of mononuclear Ln-EDTA complexes with coordinated water molecules having ammonium ions, its analogues, and alkali metals as counter-cations. However, there is a tendency for greater variation in the average atomic bond lengths as the Ln-EDTA complexes became non-mononuclear or coordination polymers. This phenomenon is influenced by various types of counter-cations, including bridging another Ln ions coordinated to the O atoms of -COO− in neighboring EDTA anions, as well as factors beyond the coordination sphere. Such variation is uncommon in the studies of the lanthanide contraction of the complexes having rigid ligands previously reported. It is suggested that the EDTA anions have a versatility as ligands, which could provide a flexibility in the CN and atomic bond lengths in the lanthanide contraction. This manuscript is a revised version of my preprint (doi: 10.51094/jxiv.560). 29https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 КОНТРАКЦІЯ ЛАНТАНІДУ В ХЕЛАТАХ ЕТИЛЕНДІАМІНТЕТРАОЦТОВОЇ КИСЛОТИ НА ОСНОВІ КРИСТАЛОГРАФІЧНИХ ДАНИХ: КОРОТКИЙ ОГЛЯД Дайсуке Ногучі Відділ освіти та підтримки досліджень, Вища школа інженерії, Університет Нага- сакі, вул. Бланкйо 1−14, Нагасакі 8528521, Японія e-mail: a.chemist.noguchi.d@gmail.com Хоча явище скорочення лантаноїдів було вже широко вивчено, систематизація етилендіамінтетраацетату лантаноїду (Ln- EDTA) залишається недостатньою, хоча зазвичай використовують хелати EDTA. Таким чином, це дослідження являє собою комплексний аналіз на основі даних Кем- бриджського центру кристалографічних даних (CCDC). У моноядерних комплексах EDTA з координованими молекулами води представлено систематичне скорочення лантаноїдів залежно від їхнього коорди- наційного числа. Однак у немоноядерних комплексах або координаційних полімерах спостерігаємо більшу варіацію довжини атомного зв’язку, що є рідкістю для дослі- джень скорочення лантаноїдів у попередніх дослідженнях. Це свідчить про гнучкість і універсальність EDTA як ліганду. Ключові слова: координаційна сполука, f-блок, рідкоземельний елемент, поліаміно- карбонова кислота. REFERENCES 1. Cotton S.A. Scandium, yttrium & the lantha- nides: inorganic & coordination chemistry. In: King RB, Crabtree RH, Lukehart CM, Atwood DA, Scott RA, editors. Encyclopedia of Inor- ganic Chemistry: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2006: 1−40. doi: 10.1002/0470862106.ia211. 2. Pellissier H. Recent developments in enanti- oselective lanthanide-catalyzed transforma- tions. Coord Chem Rev. 2017. 336: 96–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.01.013. 3. Zapolotsky E.N., Qu Y., Babailov S.P. Lantha- nide complexes with polyaminopolycarbo xylates as prospective NMR/MRI diagnostic probes: peculiarities of molecular structure, dynamics and paramagnetic properties. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem. 2022. 102(1−2): 1–33. doi: 10.1007/s10847-021-01112-3. 4. Quadrelli E.A. Lanthanide contraction over the 4f series follows a quadratic decay. Inorg. Chem. 2002. 41(2): 167–9. doi: 10.1021/ic015580v. 5. Seitz M., Oliver A.G., Raymond K.N. The lan- thanide contraction revisited. J Am Chem Soc. 2004. 129(36): 11153–60. doi: 10.1021/ja072750f. 6. Jordan R.B. Lanthanide contraction: what is normal? Inorg Chem. 2023. 62(9): 3715–21. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03674. 7. Shannon R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst A. 1976. 32(5): 751–67. doi: 10.1107/S0567739476001551. 8. Cotton S.A. Establishing coordination num- bers for the lanthanides in simple complexes. C R Chimie. 2005. 8(2): 129–45. doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2004.07.002. 9. Cotton S.A., Raithby P.R. Systematics and sur- prises in lanthanide coordination chemistry. Coord Chem Rev. 2017. 340: 220–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.01.011. 30 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY 10. Reuter H., Böltken M., Horstmann M., Ha ase M. Structural evolution in a series of iso- morphous rare earth compounds as response of lanthanide contraction. Crystals. 2023. 13(7): 1043. doi: 1043. 10.3390/cryst13071043. 11. Lu H., Zheng Z., Qiu J., Hou Y., Hou H., Wen  T., Guo X., Pan Q., Wang Y., Wang J., Lin J. Switching photochromism in coordina- tion polymers by forcing lanthanide contrac- tion. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2023. 4(3): 101306. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101306. 12. Zhang K., Dai Z., Zhang W., Gao Q., Dai Y., Xia F., Zhang X. EDTA-based adsorbents for the removal of metal ions in waste-water. Co- ord. Chem. Rev. 2021. 434: 213809. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213809. 13. Kolat R.S., Powell J.E. The solid rare earth che- lates of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Inorg. Chem. 1962. 1(3): 485–90. doi: 10.1021/ic50003a008. 14. Porai-Koshits M.A., Polynova T.N. Stereo- chemistry of metal complexes based on ethy lenediaminetetraacetic acid and its diamine analogs. Sov J Coord Chem. 1984. 10(6): 395– 439. 15. Wang J., Hu P., Liu B., Jin X., Kong Y., Gao J., Wang D., Wang B., Xu R., Zhang X. Investiga- tion on coordination number and geometrical conformation of rare earth complexes with catenulate aminopolycarboxylic acid ligands. J Coord Chem. 2010. 63(13): 2193–222. doi: 10.1080/00958972.2010.500378. 16. Noguchi D. Analysis of specialties of crystal structure for non-chelate conformations of ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid and its salts with alkali and alkaline earth metals. Ukr. Chem J. 2022. 88(10): 55–69. doi: 10.33609/2708-129X.88.10.2022.55−69. 17. Janicki R., Mondry A., Starynowicz P. Carbo xylates of rare earth elements. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017. 340: 98–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.12.001. 18. Nassimbeni L.R., Wright M.R.W., Niekerk  J. Cvan, McCallum P.A. Packing patterns in lanthanide–edta complexes: crystal and mo- lecular structures of sodium triaqua(ethylene- diaminetetraacetato)dysprosate(III) pentahy- drate and caesium diaqua(ethylenediamine- tetraacetato)ytterbate(III) trihydrate. Acta Cryst B. 1979. 35(6): 1341–5. doi: 10.1107/S0567740879006415. 19. Templeton L.K., Templeton D.H., Zalkin A., Ruben H.W. Anomalous scattering by pra- seodymium, samarium and gadolinium and structures of their ethylenediaminetetra acetate (edta) salts. Acta Cryst B. 1982. 38(8): 2155–9. doi: 10.1107/S056774088200822X. 20. Stezowski J.J., Hoard J.L. Heavy metal iono- phores: correlations among structural para meters of complexed nonpeptide polyamino acids. Isr J Chem. 1984. 24: 323–34. doi: 10.1002/ijch.198400055. 21. Ternovaya T.V., Shelest V.P., Gerasimenko N.V., Ii'nitskaya E.L. Structure of ethylene diaminetetraacetates of rare-earth elements in crystals and solutions. Theor. Exp. Chem. 1985. 21(4): 418–28. doi: 10.1007/BF01004513. 22. Templeton L.K., Templeton D.H., Zalkin A. Structure of monoclinic sodium (ethylenedi- aminetetraacetato)holmate(III) octahydrate, Na[Ho(C10H12N2O8)].8H2O: disorder induced by radiation. Acta Cryst C. 1985. 41(3): 355–8. doi: 10.1107/S0108270185003894. 23. Matković-Čalogović D. Structure of potassium triaqua(ethylenediaminetetraacetato)- neody- mate(III) pentahydrate. Acta Cryst C. 1988. 44(3): 435–7. doi: 10.1107/S0108270187011004. 24. Nakamura K., Kurisaki T., Wakita H., Yamagu- chi T. Sodium triaqua(ethylenediaminetetraac- etato)lanthanate(III) pentahydrate and the iso- morphous neodymium(III) and europium(III) salts. Acta Cryst C. 1995. 51(8): 1559–63. doi: 10.1107/S0108270195001843. 25. Janicki R., Mondry A. Structural and thermo- 31https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 dynamic aspects of hydration of Gd(III) sys- tems. Dalton Trans. 2019. 48(10): 3380–91. doi: 10.1039/C8DT04869J. 26. Noguchi D. Coordination numbers for ra- re-earths ethylenediaminetetraacetate (REE- EDTA) in crystalline state: a mini-review. Rep Grad Sch Eng Nagasaki Univ. 2023. 53(101): 46–53. (in Japanese). Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10069/0002000111 (acce ssed December, 2023). 27. Wang J., Zhang X.D., Jia W.G., Zhang Y., Liu Z.R. Syntheses and structural research- es of nine-coordinated (NH4)[EuIII(Edta) (H2O)3]·H2O and (NH4)3[EuIII(Ttha)]·5H2O. Russ J Coord Chem. 2004. 30(2): 130–6. doi: 10.1023/B:RUCO.0000015085.35282.af. 28. Wang X.F., Lui X.Zh., Wang J., Zhang Zh.H., Sun W., Kong Y.M., Zhang X.D. Syntheses and structures of nine-coordinate NH4[HoIII(Edta) (H2O)3]·1.5H2O, (NH4)4[Ho2 III(Dtpa)2]·9H2O, and (NH4)3[HoIII(Ttha)]·5H2O complexes. Russ J Coord Chem. 2008. 34(2): 134–45. doi: 10.1134/S1070328408020097. 29. Filippova T.V., Polynova T.N., Il'inskii A.L., Porai-Koshits M.A., Martynenko L.I. Crystal structure of the pentahydrate ammonium salt of erbium(III) ethylenediaminetetraacetate. J Struct Chem. 1977. 18(6): 895–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00745486. 30. Polynova T.N., Filippova T.V., Porai-Koshits M.A. Crystal structure of ammonium erbi- um(III) ethylenediaminetetraacetate penta hydrate. Koord Khim. 1985. 12(3): 409–14. (in Russian). 31. Ma C.C., Li Y., Wang J., Kong D.Y., Qin C., Wu Q. Syntheses and structural determination of mononuclear nine-coordinate (MnH)[GdIII (EDTA)(H2O)3]·4H2O and 2D ladder-like bi- nuclear nine-coordinate (MnH)2-[GdIII 2(H2T- THA)2]·4H2O. Russ J Coord Chem. 2014. 40(9): 617–26. doi: 10.1134/S1070328414080065. 32. Ragul R., Sivasankar B.N. Syntheses, charac- terization and structural determination of nine coordinated N2H5[Ce(edta)(H2O)3]·4H2O and N2H5[Eu(edta)(H2O)3]·4H2O. J Chem Cryst. 2011. 41(9): 1273–9. doi: 10.1007/s10870-011-0087-6. 33. Ragul R., Sivasankar B.N. Synthesis, structure, antioxidant, and antiviral studies on N2H5[L- n(edta)(H2O)3].5H2O (Ln = Pr, Nd, and Sm). Synth React Inorg Met-Org Nano-Met Chem. 2013. 43(4): 382–9. doi: 10.1080/15533174.2012.740736. 34. Vikram L., Sonia C., Sivasankar B.N. New nine coordinated hydrated heavier lanthanide ethylenediaminetetraacetates containing hyd razinium cation: molecular structure of N2H5[Tb(EDTA)(H2O)3]·5H2O and N2H5[G- d(EDTA)(H2O)3]·5H2O. Asian J Chem. 2013. 25(3): 1441–6. doi: 10.14233/ajchem.2013.13059A. 35. Vikram L., Sivasankar B.N. New nine coordi- nated hydrated heavier lanthanide ethylene- diaminetetraacetates containing hydrazinium cation: crystal structure of N2H5[Dy(EDTA) (H2O)3](H2O)5. Indian J Chem A. 2008. 47(1): 25–31. Available at http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/ 526 (accessed December, 2023). 36. Janicki R., Mondry A. Relationships between structure and spectroscopic properties of Nd3+ ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonates and ethylenediaminetetraacetates. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2013. 2013(19): 3429–38. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201300089. 37. Mondry A., Janicki R. From structural pro perties of the EuIII complex with ethylene- diaminetetra(methylenephosphonic acid) (H8EDTMP) towards biomedical applications. Dalton Trans. 2006. 39: 4702–10. doi: 10.1039/B606420E. 38. Janicki R., Mondry A. A new approach to de- termination of hydration equilibria constants for the case of [Er(EDTA)(H2O)n] - complexes. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014. 16(48): 26823–31. doi: 10.1039/C4CP04093G. 39. Janicki R., Starynowicz P., Mondry A. Com- plexes of Yb3+ with EDTA and CDTA – 32 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY molecular and electronic structure. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2008. 2008(19): 3075–82. doi: 10.1002/ejic.200800249. 40. Drew MG.B., Foreman MR.St.J, Hudson M.J., Kennedy K.F. Structural studies of lanthanide complexes with tetradentate nitrogen ligands. Inorg Chim Acta. 2004. 357(14): 4102–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2004.06.032. 41. Engel D.W., Takusagawa F., Koetzle T.F. Neu- tron diffraction study at 37 K of sodium tri- aqua(ethylenediaminetetraacetato)sama- rate(III) pentahydrate, Na[Sm(C10H12N2O8) (H2O)3].5H2O. Acta Cryst C. 1984. 40(10): 1687–93. doi: 10.1107/S0108270184009173. 42. Wang J., Hu P., Liu B., Chen X., Zhang L.Q., Han G.X., Xu R., Zhang X.D. Mononuclear nine-coordinate Na[SmIII(edta)(H2O)3]·5H2O and one dimensional unlimited ladderlike eight-coordinate {[SmIII(Hpdta)(H2O)]·2H2O}n complexes: synthesis and structural determi- nation. Russ J Inorg Chem. 2010. 55(10): 1567– 73. doi: 10.1134/S003602361010013X. 43. Holmberg R.J., Korobkov I., Murugesu M. Enchaining EDTA-chelated lanthanide mole cular magnets into ordered 1D networks. RSC Adv. 2016. 6(76): 72510–8. doi: 10.1039/C6RA09831B. 44. Holmberg RJ, Ho LTA, Ungur L, Korobkov I, Chibotaru LF, Murugesu M. Observation of unusual slow-relaxation of the magnetisation in a Gd-EDTA chelate. Dalton Trans. 2015. 44(47): 20321–5. doi: 10.1039/C5DT04072H. 45. Wang J., Gao G., Zhang Z., Zhang X., Wang Y. Syntheses and structural determinations of the nine-coordinate rare earth metal: Na4[DyIII(dt-pa)(H2O)]2·16H2O, Na[DyIII (edta)(H2O)3]· 3.25H2O and Na3[DyIII(nta)2(H2O)]·5.5H2O. J Coord Chem. 2007. 60(20): 2221–41. doi: 10.1080/00958970701258622. 46. Eggen M., Kędziorski A., Janicki R., Kora bik M., Krośnicki M. The ab initio and expe rimental study of the spectroscopic and mag- netic properties of Ho(III)-EDTA. Polyhedron. 2022. 222: 115851. doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2022.115851. 47. Sakagami N., Yamada Y., Konno T., Okamo- to  K. Crystal structures and stereochemical properties of lanthanide(III) complexes with ethylenediamine-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetate. In- org Chim Acta. 1999. 288(1): 7–16. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1693(99)00005-5. 48. Chen M., Xu Z., Zhou Z. Conversions of mo nomeric, dimeric and tetrameric lanthanum and samarium citrates with ethylenediamine- tetraacetates in aqueous solutions. Polyhedron. 2018. 153: 213–7. doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2018.07.015. 49. Wang J., Zhang X., Zhang Y., Liu X., Liu Z. Re- searches on crystal and molecular structures of nine-coordination mononuclear K[EuIII(Edta)(H2O)3]·3.5H2O and binucle- ar K4[EuIII 2(HTtha)2]·13.5H2O. Russ J Coord Chem. 2004. 30(12): 850–8. doi: 10.1007/s11173-005-0026-1. 50. Wang J., Zhang X., Fan D., Ling X. Synthesis and structural determination of nine-coor- dinate K[GdIII(edta)(H2O)3]·5H2O. Rare Met. 2001. 20(4): 224–9. 51. Yang C., Guo G., Zhou G., Zheng F., Liu J., Ma H., Wang M., Huang J. Synthesis and crys- tal structure of potassium triaqua(ethylenedi- amine-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetate)gadolinium(III) pentahydrate. Chin J Struct Chem. 2002. 21(4): 364–7. (in Chinese). 52. Wang J., Liu Z., Zhang X., Jia W., Zhang Y., Tong  J., Zhang P. Study on syntheses and structures of nine-coordinated mononuclear K[TbⅢ(edta) (H2O)3]·5H2O and binuclear K4[TbⅢ 2(Httha)2]·14H2O complexes. Rare Met. 2003. 22(4): 241–9. 53. Sakagami N., Homma J., Konno T., Okamo- to K. Potassium diaqua(ethylenediaminetetra acetato)ytterbate(III) pentahydrate. Acta Cryst C. 1997. 53(10): 1376–8. doi: 10.1107/S0108270197006094. 54. Lind M.D., Lee B., Hoard J.L. Structure and bonding in a ten-coordinate lanthanum(III) 33https://ucj.org.ua Daisuke Noguchi UCJ № 09 / Vol. 89 chelate of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. J Am Chem Soc. 1965. 87(7): 1611–2. doi: 10.1021/ja01085a036. 55. Xiong D., Chen H., Yang X., Zhao J. Hydro- thermal synthesis and characterization of a new 1-D polymeric lanthanum ethylenedi- aminetetraacetate with less metal-aqua coor- dination: {[La(EDTA)(H2O)]2}n. Inorg Chim Acta. 2007. 360(5): 1616–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2006.08.044. 56. Zhang C., Zhang C., Chen Y. Two extended ar- chitectures formed by Anderson-type polyoxo metalates and Zr4+/Ce3+–1,2-diaminoethane- tetraacetate complexes. Solid State Sci. 2011. 13(5): 1122–6. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2011.01.006. 57. Huang X., Xu X., Pan W., Zeng R. Poly[aqua[μ- N′-(carboxymethyl)ethylenediamineN,N,N′- triacetato]neodymium(III)]. Acta Cryst E. 2008. 64(9): m1194. doi: 10.1107/S1600536808026445. 58. Zhou G., Wu G., Deng Z., Chen X. Poly[aqua[μ3- N′-(carboxymethyl)ethylenediamine-N,N, N′-triacetato]samarium(III)]. Acta Cryst E. 2008. 64(10): m1348. doi: 10.1107/S1600536808031036. 59. Li L., Feng C., Zhang Y. Hydrothermal syn- thesis, crystal structure and magnetic pro perties of a new 2D gadolinium(III) complex: {[Gd(HEDTA)]·3H2O}n. Chin J Inorg Chem. 2011. 27(5): 984–8. Available at http://www. wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxben/ch/reader/view_ab- stract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=20110530&jour- nal_id=wjhxxbcn (accessed December, 2023). 60. Zhuang X., Long Q., Wang J. Poly[[[μ3-N′-(car- boxymethyl)ethylenediamine-N,N,N′-triace- tato]dysprosium(III)] trihydrate]. Acta Cryst E. 2010. 66(11): m1436. doi: 10.1107/S1600536810041784. 61. You X., Ng S.W. Poly[hydronium [dyspro- sium(III)-μ3-(ethylenediaminetetraacetato- κ8N,N′,O,O′,O′′,O′′′:O′′′':O′′′'')] monohydra te]. Acta Cryst E. 2007. 63(7): m1819. doi: 10.1107/S1600536807025044. 62. You X., Wang L., Ng S.W. Poly[hydronium [μ-(ethylenediaminetetraacetato-κ8N,N′,O, O′,O′′,O′′′:O′′′′,O′′′′′)holmate(III)] monohy- drate]. Acta Cryst E. 2007; 63(6): m1714. doi: 10.1107/S1600536807024373. 63. You X., Wang L., Ng S.W. Poly[hydronium [μ-(ethylenediaminetetraacetato-κ8N,N',O, O',O'',O''':O'''',O''''')erbate(III)] monohydrate]. Acta Cryst E. 2007. 63(6): m1713. doi: 10.1107/S1600536807024361. 64. Guo Y., Hou Y., Dong X., Yang Y., Xia W., Weng  W., Zhou Z. Well-defined lanthanum ethylenediaminetetraacetates as the precur- sors of catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane. Inorg Chim Acta. 2015. 434: 221–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2015.05.029. 65. Wang S., Xie Z., Dong X., Zhou Z. Gel self-as- sembly of lanthanum aminopolycarboxylates with skeleton structures and adsorptions of gases. New J Chem. 2021. 45(36): 16816–21. doi: 10.1039/D1NJ02237G. 66. Chen S., Wang C., Li D., Wang X. Study on some biologically active coordination com- pounds of metal ions (I) – synthesis, charac- terization, structure and antitumor activity of complex of 3,6-di-(dimethylamino)-dibenzo- pyriodonium lanthanum EDTA. Sci Chin Ser B Chem Life Sci Earth Sci. 1989. 32(8): 918–26. 67. Lin R., Shi Y., Hou Y., Xia W., Weng W., Zhou Z. Highly water-soluble dimeric and trimeric lanthanide carbonates with ethylenediamine- tetraacetates as precursors of catalysts for the oxidative coupling reaction of methane. New J Chem. 2022. 46(8): 3707–15. doi: 10.1039/D1NJ05608E. 68. Pradeep R., Naresh K., Hussain T.M.A, Vikram  L., Sivasankar B.N. Crystal and mo- lecular structure of novel binuclear ten co- ordinated praseodymium(III) with octaden- tateethylenediaminetetraacetate – synthesis, characterization and antioxidant, antiviral and anticancer activities. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2017. 21(3): 358–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2016.11.002. 34 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2023 LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW.INORGANIC CHEMISTRY 69. Song W., Yan J., Wang H., Ji L., Ma D., Ng S.W. Hydro(solvo)thermal synthesis and structural characterization of three lanthanide–carboxy late coordination polymers based on BDC and/or EDTA. J Coord Chem. 2010. 63(4): 625–33. doi: 10.1080/00958970903560056. 70. Lu T., Wang X., Cheng L., Chen C., Shi H., Zheng J., Zheng X. Soft metal–organic frame- works based on {Na@Ln6} as a secondary building unit featuring a magnetocaloric effect and fluorescent sensing for cyclohexane and Fe3+. Cryst Growth Des. 2021. 21(12): 7065–74. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00978. 71. Chen M., Gao S., Zhou Z. Isolations and cha racterization of highly water-soluble dimeric lanthanide citrate and malate with ethylenedi- aminetetraacetate. Dalton Trans. 2012. 41(4): 1202–9. doi: 10.1039/C1DT11466B. 72. Wang S., Gao S., Dai J., Shi Y., Dong Y., Weng  W., Zhou Z. Carbonate and phosphite encaged in frameworks constructed from square lanthanum aminopolycarboxylates and sodium chloride. Dalton Trans. 2019. 48(9): 2959–66. doi: 10.1039/C8DT04940H. 73. Shi Y., Lin R., Chen M., Dong X., Li H., Weng W., Zhou Z. Highly water-soluble terna- ry citrato and malato lanthanide ethylenedi- aminetetraacetes with carbonate. J Mol Struct. 2022. 1254: 132303. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.132303. 74. Barnes J.C., Blyth C.S., Paton J.D., Smith I.G.B. Dimeric Ce(IV) peroxide complexes. Crystal structures of hexapotassium disodi- um bis-μ-peroxohexacarbonatodicerate(IV) 8-hydrate and dipotassium disodium bis- μ-peroxobis(ethylenediamine-N,N,N ',N '- tetraacetato)dicerate(IV) 13-hydrate. Lanth Act Res. 1990. 3: 181–93. 75. Pook N., Adam A. Synthesis, crystal structure, and vibrational spectra of five novel peroxi docerates(IV) and the occurrence of a new complex unit in K8[Ce2(O2)3(NTA)2]2·20H2O. Z Anorg Allg Chem. 2014. 640(14): 2931–8. doi: 10.1002/zaac.201400376. 76. Lu T., Xu H., Cheng L., Wang X., Chen C., Cao L., Zhuang G., Zheng J., Zheng X. Family of nanoclusters, Ln33 (Ln = Sm/Eu) and Gd32, exhibiting magnetocaloric effects and fluores- cence sensing for MnO4 –. Inorg Chem. 2022. 61(23): 8861–9. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00898. 77. Starynowicz P. Synthesis and structure of tri sodium (ethylenediaminetetraacetato)europa te(II) chloride heptahydrate. J Alloys Compd. 1998. 269(1−2): 67–70. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(98)00003-6. 78. Janicki R., Mondry A., Starynowicz P. A new complex of Europium(II) with edta – structure and spectroscopy. Z Anorg Allg Chem. 2005. 631(12): 2475–7. doi: 10.1002/zaac.200500236. 79. Gao S., Chen M., Zhou Z. Substitution of ga dolinium ethylenediaminetetraacetate with phosphites: towards gadolinium deposit in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Dalton Trans. 2014. 43(2): 639–45. doi: 10.1039/C3DT52015C. 80. Gracheva E.V., Vologzhanina A.V., Smirnova E.S., Tunik S.P. Synthesis and crystal structure of Na4[Er2(EDTA)2(μ2-C2O4)]·8H2O (where EDTA stands for ethylenediamine-N,N′- tetraacetate). Russ J Inorg Chem. 2011. 56(7): 1046–9. doi: 10.1134/S0036023611070072. 81. Janicki R., Mondry A. Structural and thermo- dynamic aspects of water–carbonate exchange equilibrium for MIII/IV–EDTA–carbonate sys- tems. Inorg Chem Front. 2019. 6(1): 153–63. doi: 10.1039/C8QI01062E. 82. Truong K., Müller P., Dronskowski R., Englert U. Dynamic uptake and release of water in the mixed-metal EDTA complex M3[Yb(EDTA) (CO3)] (M = K, Rb, Cs). Cryst Growth Des. 2017. 17(1): 80–8. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b01227. Cтаття надійшла 01. 09. 2023.
id oai:ojs2.1444248.nisspano.web.hosting-test.net:article-586
institution Ukrainian Chemistry Journal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-07-23T01:10:39Z
publishDate 2023
publisher V.I.Vernadsky Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv ucjorgua/ae/b6e973c2e685b74f7a7c4d0b6b7f5eae.pdf
spelling oai:ojs2.1444248.nisspano.web.hosting-test.net:article-5862026-07-22T08:23:52Z LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW Noguchi, Daisuke coordination compound, f-block, rare-earth element, polyaminocarboxylic acid. The lanthanide (Ln) series has been attracted so much attention not only for its physical properties but also for its applications in organic synthesis and biomedical engineering. In the lanthanide chemistry, lanthanide contraction is a crucial concept meaning the gradual decrease in ionic radii as the atomic number of the Ln series increases. As a prominent chelator, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) has been well-known to give stable complexes with various metals including Ln ions, resulted in forming (EDTA−4H)4− anion by deprotonation; over 100 kinds of Ln-EDTA complexes have hitherto been synthesized and structurally characterized using X-ray crystallography. While the lanthanide contraction phenomenon has been extensively studied in certain complexes of Ln, systematization on the Ln-EDTA remains inadequate though the chelates of EDTA are commonly used. Thus, this study presents a comprehensive analysis based on the data from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC). In mononuclear EDTA complexes X[Ln(EDTA−4H)(H2O)m]·nH2O (X+ = NH4+and its analogues) systematic lanthanide contraction depending on their coordination number are presented except for a few cases. However, in the case of non-mononuclear complexes or coordination polymers, the compositions become more complicated, and a greater variation in atomic bond length occurs, which is unusual for the lanthanide contraction studies in previous research. These varieties are considered to be influenced by different types of counter-cations, inorganic anions, solvent molecules and bridging O atoms from another EDTA anions. This suggests the flexibility and versatility of EDTA as a ligand. Such findings in the Ln-EDTA complexes could potentially provide us further development of a novel function in the future. V.I.Vernadsky Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry 2023-10-25 Article Article Inorganic Chemistry Неорганическая химия Неорганічна хімія application/pdf https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/586 10.33609/2708-129X.89.09.2023.14-34 Ukrainian Chemistry Journal; Vol. 89 No. 9 (2023): Ukrainian Chemistry Journal; 14-34 Украинский химический журнал; ##issue.vol## 89 ##issue.no## 9 (2023): Ukrainian Chemistry Journal; 14-34 Український хімічний журнал; Том 89 № 9 (2023): Український хімічний журнал; 14-34 2708-129X 2708-1281 en https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/586/298 Copyright (c) 2023 Daisuke Noguchi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Noguchi, Daisuke
LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW
title LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW
title_full LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW
title_fullStr LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW
title_short LANTHANIDE CONTRACTION IN CHELATES OF ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID BASED ON CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA: A SHORT REVIEW
title_sort lanthanide contraction in chelates of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid based on crystallographic data: a short review
topic_facet coordination compound
f-block
rare-earth element
polyaminocarboxylic acid.
url https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/586
work_keys_str_mv AT noguchidaisuke lanthanidecontractioninchelatesofethylenediaminetetraaceticacidbasedoncrystallographicdataashortreview