BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG(Review)

Dedication: To Casey and Calley Means, fearless science and health advocates, for their inspiring work in redefining wellness and empowering individuals to take charge of their metabolic destinies.   Micro-/nanoplastics represent a ubiquitous environmental contaminant with potential adv...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2025
Автори: Han, Jianlin, Wzorek, Alicja, Klika, Karel, Ono, Taizo, Soloshonok, Vadim
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: V.I.Vernadsky Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry 2025
Онлайн доступ:https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/728
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Ukrainian Chemistry Journal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Ukrainian Chemistry Journal
_version_ 1871466137071386624
author Han, Jianlin
Wzorek, Alicja
Klika, Karel
Ono, Taizo
Soloshonok, Vadim
author_facet Han, Jianlin
Wzorek, Alicja
Klika, Karel
Ono, Taizo
Soloshonok, Vadim
author_institution_txt_mv [ { "author": "Jianlin Han", "institution": "Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China" }, { "author": "Alicja Wzorek", "institution": "Institute of Chemistry, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland" }, { "author": "Karel Klika", "institution": "Molecular Structure Analysis, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), ImNeuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany" }, { "author": "Taizo Ono", "institution": "National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 463-8560, Nagoya, Japan" }, { "author": "Vadim Soloshonok", "institution": "University of Basque Country" } ]
author_sort Han, Jianlin
baseUrl_str https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2026-07-22T08:23:56Z
description Dedication: To Casey and Calley Means, fearless science and health advocates, for their inspiring work in redefining wellness and empowering individuals to take charge of their metabolic destinies.   Micro-/nanoplastics represent a ubiquitous environmental contaminant with potential adverse effects across all living organisms. Ongoing research consistently reveals new and expands upon existing concerns regarding plastic exposure. Notably, emerging evidence suggests a link between plastic exposure and premature cognitive decline in older adults, potentially contributing to the onset or exacerbation of neurodegenerative diseases associated with dementia. Furthermore, endocrine-disrupting chemicals derived from plastics have been implicated in hormonal imbalances, potentially resulting in the masculinization of female development and the feminization of male development. If unmitigated, these impacts could precipitate a substantial and unforeseen environmental health crisis. This Perspective employs a chemistry-based approach to elucidate plastic-related health issues and introduces the concept of bioavailable plastic, i.e. plastic particles smaller than 2.5 μm capable of biological barrier penetration. We highlight lipophilicity as the key physicochemical property responsible for the uptake of these particles within organisms particularly their accumulation in adipose tissues, including the brain. Furthermore, we propose a solvation-assisted desorption mechanism whereby oligomeric molecules released from plastics in fatty tissues generate mono- and dicarboxylic acids that mimic endogenous fatty acids. These exogenous fatty acids can integrate into phospholipid and glycolipid biosynthesis becoming components of cell membranes and myelin sheaths. These considerations should stimulate research aimed at neurological health protection in an increasingly plastic-laden environment, though the broader implications of this integration are of significant concern. Mechanistic understanding of the link between bioavailable plastic exposure and central nervous system disorders is crucial for informing transformative policy changes and preventive measures to safeguard future generations’ health. To empower readers with actionable strategies for reducing plastic exposure, we offer several recommendations. Notably, limiting the consumption of fatty animal products, especially pork fat (salo) is advised. While salo is a culturally significant food, it appears to be a major reservoir for plastic particles, particularly those smaller than 200 nm, i.e. bioavailable plastic. These nanoparticles, due to their ability to traverse biological barriers in humans, pose a considerable risk. This Perspective seeks to underscore the critical need for comprehensive research into the long-term health effects of microplastics highlighting their pervasive presence and potential hidden dangers.
doi_str_mv 10.33609/2708-129X.91.5.2025.33-62
first_indexed 2025-09-26T01:42:09Z
format Article
fulltext 33 UDC 546.26-162: 541.13:549.21 doi: 10.33609/2708-129X.91.5.2025.33-62 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG. Jianlin Han1, Alicja Wzorek2, Karel D. Klika3, Taizo Ono4, Vadim A. Soloshonok5,6* 1 Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2 Institute of Chemistry, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Uniwersytecka 7, 25–406 Kielce, Poland 3 Research and Development Center, Archer Daniels Midland, 1001 N Brush College Rd., Decatur, IL 62521, USA; 4 National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2266–98, Anagahora, Shimoshidami, Moriyama-ku, Nagoya, 463–8560, Japan; 5 Department of Organic Chemistry I, Faculty of Chemistry, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo Manuel Lardizábal 3, 20018 San Sebastián, Spain; 6 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, María Díaz de Haro 3, Plaza Bizkaia, 48013 Bilbao, Spain email: vadimsoloshonok@gmail.com Dedication: To Casey and Calley Means, fearless science and health advocates, for their inspir- ing work in redefining wellness and empowering individuals to take charge of their metabolic destinies. Micro-/nanoplastics represent a ubiquitous environmental contaminant with potential adverse effects across all living organisms. Ongoing research consistently reveals new and expands upon existing concerns regarding plastic exposure. Notably, emerging evidence suggests a link between plastic exposure and premature cognitive decline in older adults, potentially contributing to the onset or exacerbation of neurodegenerative diseases associat- ed with dementia. Furthermore, endocrine-disrupting chemicals derived from plastics have been implicated in hormonal imbalances, potentially resulting in the masculinization of fe- male development and the feminization of male development. If unmitigated, these impacts could precipitate a substantial and unforeseen environmental health crisis. This Perspective employs a chemistry-based approach to elucidate plastic-related health issues and introduces the concept of bioavailable plastic, i.e. plastic particles smaller than 2.5 μm capable of bio- logical barrier penetration. We highlight lipophilicity as the key physicochemical property responsible for the uptake of these particles within organisms particularly their accumula- tion in adipose tissues, including the brain. Furthermore, we propose a solvation-assisted 34 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY desorption mechanism whereby oligomeric molecules released from plastics in fatty tissues generate mono- and dicarboxylic acids that mimic endogenous fatty acids. These exogenous fatty acids can integrate into phospholipid and glycolipid biosynthesis becoming components of cell membranes and myelin sheaths. These considerations should stimulate research aimed at neurological health protection in an increasingly plastic-laden environment, though the broader implications of this integration are of significant concern. Mechanistic understand- ing of the link between bioavailable plastic exposure and central nervous system disorders is crucial for informing transformative policy changes and preventive measures to safeguard future generations’ health. To empower readers with actionable strategies for reducing plastic exposure, we offer several recommendations. Notably, limiting the consumption of fatty ani- mal products, especially pork fat (salo) is advised. While salo is a culturally significant food, it appears to be a major reservoir for plastic particles, particularly those smaller than 200 nm, i.e. bioavailable plastic. These nanoparticles, due to their ability to traverse biological barriers in humans, pose a considerable risk. This Perspective seeks to underscore the critical need for comprehensive research into the long-term health effects of microplastics highlighting their pervasive presence and potential hidden dangers. Key words: Bioavailable Plastic, Micro-/Nanoplastics, Environmental Contaminants, Environmental Health Crisis Systemic Pollution, Particle Size Distribution, Biological Bar- rier Penetration, Cognitive Decline, Neurotoxicity, Plastic Additives, Bisphenols, Phthalates, Hormonal Disruption, Endocrine System, Lipophilicity, Lipid-Mediated Transport, Adipose Tissue Accumulation, Salo (Ukrainian Cured Fat), Solvation-Assisted Desorption, Endoge- nous/Exogenous Fatty Acids. INTRODUCTION. The widespread adop- tion of synthetic polymers, including plastics and fibers, since the 1950’s has fundamentally altered material consumption patterns [1–3]. While offering demonstrable advantages in terms of cost and functional longevity, the rapid escalation of plastic production – from 1.5 million metric tons in 1950 to 413.8 million metric tons in 2023 with projected increases to 590 million metric tons by 2050 – presents a critical environmental challenge [4]. The so cietal perception of plastics as synonymous with hygiene and sterility has obscured the potential for deleterious effects on ecosystems and human health. Emerging evidence sug- gests that the accumulation of plastic debris, particularly micro- and nanoplastics, may con- tribute to significant ecological disruption and biological toxicity, potentially impacting the viability of diverse life forms [5–10]. Since approximately 2020, the scientific discourse has increasingly focused on the per- vasive dispersion of microplastics throughout the Earth’s systems, mirroring historical ob- servations of microbial ubiquity. Microplastic particles have been quantified across a range of environmental compartments, from the cryosphere (polar regions) [11–14] and litho sphere (deep-sea trenches, mountain peaks) [15, 16] to the atmosphere (cloud formations) 35https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 [17] and hydrosphere (oceanic sediments) [18–21]. Furthermore, evidence of bioaccumu- lation in diverse organisms, including human populations, highlights systemic exposure via respiratory [22], digestive [23], and cutaneous (dermal absorption) routes [24]. Recent studies have revealed an alarming amount of data depicting the pervasive pre sence of microplastics and their significant impact on the environment and human health [25–29]. However, the actual situation is likely far worse due to limitations in current analyti- cal and capture methods [30]. For example, re- search indicates that the amount of microplas- tics in the environment is vastly underesti- mated. Specifically, data show that when nets with a 100 μm mesh are used, the microplastic particle numbers are 2.5 times and 10 times greater than nets with 333 and 500 μm meshes, respectively, are used,. Moreover, it is estima ted that microplastic particle numbers might possibly exceed 3,700 particles/mm3 when nets with a 1 μm mesh size are employed [31]. Fur- themore, thousands of additives are utilized to enhance the durability, flexibility, color, flame retardancy, and/or strength of plastics. These additives, predominantly aromatic organic compounds, often are only bound to superfi- cial regulation by authorities. As plastics de- grade, these chemicals are released into the environment and permeate various forms of life [32–34]. Unfortunately, a similar scenar- io is observed with the regulation of numer- ous chemical additives in the food industry. Given the prolonged lifespan of various plas- tics, anywhere from 20–1,000 years, it seems that we are merely at the nascent stages of the microplastic pandemic [35]. Despite the surge in research activity in the field of microplastics, the novelty of the sub- ject matter has resulted in a lack of systema tic approaches leaving critical areas of impact unaddressed. While the scientific community is actively exploring the pervasive presence and consequences of microplastics, certain key aspects remain overlooked due to the nascent stage of the research. As a result, there is an urgent need for a more comprehensive and organized framework to ensure that all rele- vant environmental and health implications are thoroughly investigated and understood. In this Perspective we address the ongoing debate and lack of consensus regarding the size classi- fication of microplastics and the end-products of their degradation [36]. Importantly, we in- troduce the concept of bioavailable plastic, emphasizing their impact on living organisms, including humans. This approach prioritizes understanding the interactions between mi- croplastics and biological systems, highlight- ing the significance of their effects on health and the environment. In our view, the ability of microplastics to penetrate biological barriers is of paramount concern. Additionally, we delve into the often underdiscussed and occasional- ly misrepresented issue of the physicochemi- cal properties of microplastics and their end- products. Understanding these properties will enable us to map the preferential distribution and accumulation of microplastics within the body and guide future research efforts. Con- sidering the limited effectiveness of govern- mental regulation on microplastics, we provide practical recommendations throughout this discussion. Our aim is to empower readers to take proactive steps in managing their expo- sure to microplastics, fostering a sense of per- sonal agency and responsibility in addressing this pressing issue. 36 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Plastic degradation and end-products. The major types of plastics (Fig. 1) – poly ethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), polyure- thane (PUR), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) – account for more than 80% of the plastic market [37]. These materials are widely used in various applications, including packag- ing, construction materials, automobiles, and consumer goods, making them the dominant types of plastics in the markets. PUR and PET can undergo hydrolysis under specific envi- ronmental conditions (either slightly basic or slightly acidic) and therefore they are not ty pically considered the primary culprits in dis- cussions on the “plastic apocalypse” [38, 39]. Nonetheless, both PUR and PET still contri bute to plastic pollution and environmental issues making it essential to consider their im- pact and seek sustainable alternatives whenever possible. In sharp contrast, PE, PP, PVC, and PS are chemically inert and can persist in envi- ronmental conditions for a very long time. The decomposition of this group of plastics, which contribute approximately 70% of worldwide pollution, is a highly complex and multifaceted process [40]. Fig. 1 Structure and properties of the major types of plastics collectively accounting for more than 80% of the global plastic market. 37https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 One of the most common degradation pro- cesses is mechanical degradation. This path- way involves the physical breakdown of plastic materials into smaller fragments through abra- sion, cutting, or other physical forces [41–43]. Another general process is oxidative degrada- tion, which occurs when plastics are exposed to oxygen, often accelerated by heat [44,  45] or UV radiation [46 47]. Other degradation routes include photodegradation, where expo- sure to UV radiation from sunlight causes the breakdown of plastic polymers [48]; hydroly tic degradation, which involves the chemical breakdown of polyester or polyamide plastics in the presence of water or moisture [49]; and biodegradation by microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi, which break down certain types of plastics through enzymatic processes, converting them into simpler compounds [50]. Thermal degradation can also be considered as a separate category since excessive tempera- tures alone can cause the breakdown of plastic polymers through pyrolysis [51]. These classifications reflect either the initial step of the degradation process (e.g., mecha nical) or its chemical nature (e.g., oxidation). However, from a chemical standpoint, the pro- cesses are similar, involving the generation of free radicals followed by a cascade of stabiliza- tion reactions. Even mechanical degradation, such as tearing and ripping, involves homolytic cleavage of C–C bonds in the polymer chains, leading to the formation of free radicals. From this perspective, there is no significant diffe rence between mechanical, UV light, or ther- mal degradation routes. Although a fundamental distinction can be made between abiotic and biotic degradation, this classification is not particularly useful however from a biotoxicity standpoint as biotic degradation only plays a relatively minor role in the overall degradation of plastics, account- ing for less than 1% of plastic degradation. A more meaningful distinction is between pro- cesses that affect the bulk of plastic particles and those that primarily impact the surface. Mechanical processes like tensile, compressive, and shear stresses, creep, fatigue, impact, and delamination affect the entire or a significantly large part of the plastic body [52]. In contrast, other mechanical processes such as abrasion and erosion, as well as the previously men- tioned pathways, occur primarily on the first layer of molecules exposed on the surface [53]. From a statistical perspective, one can expect that at the onset of the decomposition pro- cess, bulk-related degradation processes con- stitute the major means for degradation, but as decomposition progresses, surface-related processes are likely to take over as the primary process [54]. Furthermore, as the particles be- come smaller, the rate of degradation is expect- ed to increase. However, these considerations only hold true if the degradation occurs un- der constant conditions conducive to surface processes. For example, PVC can undergo de hydrochlorination, i.e. the elimination of HCl, and typically occurs when PVC is exposed to heat, basic conditions, or UV radiation leading to the release of HCl and formation of dou- ble bonds in the polymer chain [55]. When exposed to UV light, these double bonds can be easily oxidized, resulting in rapid degrada- tion. However, in reality, due to its relatively high density, PVC often settles at the bottom of aquatic environments or becomes otherwise shielded from UV light and oxygen, allowing it to remain intact for millennia. Understand- ing these various routes of plastic degrada- tion helps in developing strategies to manage 38 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY plastic waste and mitigate its environmental impact [56]. It should be noted that the degradation of plastics via the various environmental pro- cesses discussed above occur only very slowly, decreasing the size of the plastic particles by 103 µm/year depending on the plastic type [57] and the environmental conditions [58] yield- ing particles that vary in size [59] and shape [60]. A recent study showed that oxidation occurs at up to 600 µm depth from the sur- face layer of plastic [61]. Thus, the surface of plastics in the environment contains oxidized, less hydrophobic moieties in varying amounts, which facilitates the adsorption of environ- mental compounds [61–63]. Consequently, a plethora of different compounds can be pro- duced from plastic waste with highly diverse structures and thus constitutes one of the ma- jor challenges in the characterization of plas- tics’ impact on health. While the end-products of plastic degradation are a complex mixture of oxidized hydrocarbons, among them as sig- nificant components are the corresponding carboxylic acids and α,ω-dicarboxylic acids which are capable of mimicking endogenous fatty acids. Bioavailable plastic. The complex nature of plastic pollution stems from its variable physicochemical prop- erties as well as the size and shape of the par- ticles. Addressing this problem requires multi- disciplinary knowledge and expertise from researchers to develop standardized approach- es for studying it. One of the key factors that determines the detrimental effect of plastics on human health is particle size. The field of micro- and nanoplastics re- search, reflecting its nascent stage, is charac- terized by a lack of standardization in method- ologies, data collection, and terminology. This variability extends to particle size classification with microplastic upper limits ranging from 5 to 500 μm and lower limits inconsistently defined from no lower bound to thresholds of 0.1, 1, 20, or 63 μm. The most commonly used microplastic size range is approximately 1 to 5,000 μm [62, 64–70]. While nanoplastic classification also varies, discrepancies are less pronounced, likely due to the field’s relative immaturity. Typically, nanoplastics are defined as particles up to 1 μm, with either no low- er limit or a range of 1 to 1,000 nm [71, 72]. However, this definition is problematic as the lower bounds would then include molecules like hexane (~1 nm) and long-chain fatty acids (~3.39 nm), which are clearly within the mo- lecular, rather than particulate, size range. Although precise particle size classification remains a relevant issue, we contend that, from a human health perspective, the critical cha racteristic is a particle’s capacity for systemic intrusion into an organism. In this respect, it is important to note the already established mark- er PM2.5 [73–75] which refers to fine particu- late matter with a diameter of 2.5 μm or smaller. These tiny particles are a major component of air pollution and can be composed of various substances, including dust, dirt, soot, smoke, and plastics. Due to their small size, PM2.5 particles can penetrate deep into the respirato- ry system, reaching the lungs and even entering the bloodstream. Exposure to PM2.5 has been linked to a range of adverse health effects, in- cluding respiratory and cardiovascular diseases as well as premature death [76]. The sources of PM2.5 pollution can be either natural, such as wildfires and dust storms, or anthropogenic, such as vehicle emissions, industrial process- 39https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 es, construction activities, and plastic pollu- tion  [77]. Therefore, we propose defining bi- oavailable plastic as plastic particles ≤ 2.5 μm which are capable of systemic translocation fol- lowing ingestion, inhalation, or dermal absorp- tion. Particles of this size can traverse critical biological barriers, including the gut [78], skin [79], blood–retinal  [80], ovarian [81], placen- tal [82], blood–testis [83], blood–cerebrospinal fluid [84, 85], and blood–brain (BBB) barriers [84–86]. Of particular concern are particles < 200 nm which exhibit enhanced permeabili- ty across the BBB, potentially leading to signi ficant neurological impacts. Bioavailable plastic thus pose a range of potential health problems due to its capacity to penetrate biological bar- riers and access internal tissues [87]. Anticipa ted health issues stem from its physicochemical properties, potential for bioaccumulation, and interactions with cellular processes. Antici- pated health problems include inflammatory responses as bioavailable plastic can trigger in- flammation in various tissues due to its foreign nature. Chronic inflammation may lead to tis- sue damage and contribute to the development of chronic diseases. Additionally, these parti- cles can induce oxidative stress leading to the production of reactive oxygen species that can damage cellular components including DNA, lipids, and proteins. Bioavailable plastic can also disrupt cel- lular processes by interfering with signaling pathways, enzyme activity, and other essential functions, potentially resulting in cellular dys- function and various diseases. The presence of bioavailable plastic in an organism can mo dulate the immune system potentially causing immunosuppression or autoimmune respons- es, increasing susceptibility to infections, or contributing to autoimmune diseases. Endocrine disruption is another concern as certain chemicals incorporated into plastic, such as phthalates and bisphenols, are known endocrine disruptors. Bioavailable plastic can act as carriers for these chemicals, enhancing their delivery to internal organs and disrupting hormonal balance. Neurological impacts are potentially sig- nificant as particles smaller than 200 nm can cross the BBB leading to neuroinflammation, neuronal damage, and cognitive dysfunction. Cardiovascular effects are also possible, as par- ticles entering the bloodstream can induce vas- cular inflammation and other cardiovascular problems. Reproductive toxicity is a concern because bioavailable plastic can accumulate in repro- ductive organs, potentially affecting fertility and reproductive development. Disruption of hormonal balance also contributes to re- productive toxicity. Additionally, barriers that protect genetic information, such as the testic- ular and ovarian barriers, can be compromised by bioavailable plastic which can penetrate and potentially harm genetic material within re- productive cells. Lastly, the persistence of bioavailable plastic in the body can lead to bioaccumulation and chronic toxicity, with long-term exposure po- tentially resulting in the gradual development of chronic diseases. Physicochemical properties of plastics, lipo- philicity. Characterizing the physicochemical pro perties of plastics presents a complex and mul- tifaceted challenge. This complexity arises from the significant dependence of these properties on monomer chemical structure, polymeriza- tion methods, and the sample’s size and age. 40 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY The following properties are commonly con- sidered: chemical structure, density, strength, flexibility, heat resistance, and transparency. When plastic is reduced to nanoscale dimen- sions, its properties can undergo significant changes due to quantum and surface effects, both of which become increasingly prominent at such scales [88]. These nanoscale transfor- mations can affect all of the aforementioned physicochemical properties of plastics [89]. However, one property remains constant: the fundamental chemical structure dictated by the parent monomer. For the primary contrib- utors to plastic pollution – PE, PP, PVC, and PS – both the monomers and their polymeric forms retain a key characteristic shared by all aliphatic compounds: hydrophobicity or lipo- philicity. The lipophilicity of aliphatic plastics, a property rooted in their chemical structure, is a pivotal yet often overlooked characteristic in the literature. From a chemistry standpoint, this intrinsic feature is arguably the most crit- ical aspect that defines plastics, transcending particle size and shape. Lipophilicity, or the tendency of these plastics to interact with and dissolve in nonpolar, lipid-like environments, is not merely a mundane trait – it provides both explanatory and predictive power to un- derstand and anticipate the behavior of plastics across a wide range of contexts. For instance, hydrophobic deep eutectic sol- vents (HDESs, Fig. 2) have been demonstrat- ed to be effective agents for the liquid–liquid extraction of PS particles ranging from 100 to 1,000 nm in size, from both freshwater and brine. HDES systems formulated with 1:2 or 1:1 molar ratios of tetrabutylammonium bro- mide and decanoic acid, or tetraoctylammoni- um bromide and decanoic acid, have achieved remarkable efficiency with nearly complete (98.4%) removal of nanoplastics in a single ex- traction step [90]. Fig. 2. Structures of HDES systems used for the extraction of PS nanoparticles. The study underscores that aliphatic plastics possess strong lipophilic properties, a funda- mental trait rooted in their chemical structure. This property enables their preferential interac- tion with nonpolar, lipid-like environments over polar ones like water. The efficient extraction of 41https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 PS particles from water by HDESs highlights the practical implications of this lipophilicity, which explains the bioaccumulation of plastics in li- pid-rich tissues like adipose tissue in humans and animals. Such an understanding advances theoretical insights into the behavior of plastics and paves the way for strategies to mitigate their environmental and health impacts. The lipophilicity of aliphatic plastics also influences their behavior as carriers of pollut- ants, affecting their interactions with organic matter, membranes, and lipids. This explains their persistence and degradation patterns in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems where their hydrophobic nature favors affinities with li- pid-rich organisms over polar environments. By emphasizing lipophilicity as a defining property, researchers can predict the ecologi- cal footprint and bioaccumulative potential of plastics, offering critical insights for environ- mental policies and plastic pollution mitiga- tion. Plastic bioaccumulation in adipose tissue – documented in both humans and animals – is a pressing concern [91–95]. Adipose tissue, being lipid-rich, readily attracts hydrophobic substances like microplastics, nanoplastics, and chemical additives such as bisphenols and phthalates. These compounds, often classified as obesogens [96], disrupt endocrine function and metabolism, contributing to weight gain and storage disorders. Their accumulation is linked to oxidative stress, chronic inflamma- tion, and even accelerated aging, with addi- tional risks for morbidities such as insulin re- sistance, cardiovascular diseases, and impaired cellular repair mechanisms. These disruptions can affect energy storage and utilization in organisms, further compromising health and survival. The persistence of plastics in adipose tissue highlights their role as reservoirs for toxic sub- stances that degrade slowly, releasing pollut- ants over time. This raises concerns about their long-term health impacts on individual organ- isms and ecosystems. Addressing these risks is critical to mitigating the broader implications of plastic pollution. Foods rich in fatty tissue, like salo, a cured pork fat delicacy central to some Eastern Eu- ropean diets, may pose similar risks due to the bioaccumulation of hydrophobic pollutants. Fatty parts of animals and fish act as reservoirs for microplastics, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and heavy metals such as mercury [97–100]. Regular consumption of such foods, especially from contaminated sources, can contribute to oxidative stress, inflammation, and accelerated aging. While salo holds deep cultural and culinary importance, it is essential to consider sourcing it from less-contaminated environments and consuming it in moderation to reduce health risks. By understanding the bioaccumulation of plastics in fatty tissues, from environmental persistence to dietary implications, researchers and policymakers can develop targeted strate- gies to address the global challenges of plastic pollution while promoting informed dietary choices and safeguarding public health. Bioavailable plastic, exogenic fatty acids, and the brain. The human brain is approximately 60% fat, making it one of the fattiest organs in the body [101]. This high fat content plays a crucial role in brain function as it helps form the myelin sheath that insulates neurons, facilitates com- munication between cells, and supports the structural integrity of the brain’s membranes. 42 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Research suggests that the fats in our brains, particularly in the neocortex, played a crucial role in the evolution of human intelligence. The variety of fat molecules found in the hu- man neocortex, the brain region responsible for advanced cognitive functions such as lan- guage, evolved at an exceptionally fast rate af- ter the human–ape split [102, 103]. Approximately 20–30% of the brain’s total weight is composed of myelin, a crucial com- ponent that functions as insulation around nerve fibers, much like the coating around electrical wires [104]. By reducing electrical resistance and minimizing signal loss, my elin enables nerve impulses (action potentials) to travel rapidly and efficiently along axons. This high-speed signal transmission is vital for fundamental processes such as movement, sensation, and cognition. Structurally, myelin is a complex mixture of lipids (fats) and pro- teins, with lipids making up about 70–80% of its composition [105]. These lipids are essential for maintaining the integrity and functionality of the myelin sheath [106]. Fig. 3 illustrates the structures of the major fatty acids involved in the synthesis of myelin. Fig. 3. Structures of the major fatty acids involved in the synthesis of myelin. Oleic acid is a mono-unsaturated fatty acid that contributes to the fluidity and stability of myelin membranes; palmitic acid is a saturat- ed fatty acid that plays a role in the structural integrity of myelin; stearic acid is another sat- urated fatty acid important for maintaining the compactness of myelin; arachidonic acid is a polyunsaturated fatty acid involved in sig- naling and maintaining membrane dynamics; docosahexaenoic acid is an omega-3 fatty acid essential for neural development and myelin repair; while linoleic acid is an omega-6 fatty acid that supports the synthesis of other es- sential lipids in myelin [107]. These fatty acids are further assembled into phospholipids and glycolipids (Fig. 4) which serve as key building blocks of cell membranes and myelin sheaths [108]. 43https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 Fig. 4. Essential building blocks of cell membranes and myelin sheaths. The accumulation of nanoplastics in the brains of various species, including humans, has been thoroughly documented and rais- es significant concerns. Studies show that the brain, due to its high fat content, serves as the most prevalent site for plastic deposition with- in the body. Comparisons of plastic amounts in the brain and other organs of the same indi- vidual highlight this striking propensity. This bioaccumulation has severe consequences as it has been linked to numerous neurodegen- erative diseases [82, 109–114]. A recent study on decedent brains revealed that the largest relative proportions of plastic were found in individuals diagnosed with dementia, sug- gesting a potential correlation between plastic accumulation and cognitive disorders [115]. The mechanisms underlying the effects of na- noplastics on the brain remain unclear but are likely multifaceted. One hypothesis posits that nanoplastics trigger oxidative stress and immune responses, leading to elevated le vels of inflammatory mediators. This cascade reduces the expression and function of re gulatory proteins while increasing inhibitory protein expression. Such disruptions result in lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, misfolded protein accumulation, activation of apoptosis pathways, and neuroinflammation [23, 110]. Another explanation considers the possibil- ity that nanoplastics suppress the expression of neurotransmitter-related genes and reduce antioxidant enzyme activity despite increased expression of proteins involved in oxidative stress in specific brain regions and neural cells. This interference disrupts the production and function of proteins crucial for neural develop- ment and the structural plasticity of the central nervous system [110,111]. However, an alternative hypothesis to con- sider is rooted in the foundational principles of organic chemistry. Plastics, which exhibit strength and rigidity at the macroscale, un- dergo a remarkable transformation as their size diminishes. As the size of these materials is reduced, they become increasingly flexible 44 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY and deformable, a phenomenon that is well documented [116,117]. This size reduction induces heightened instability in their crys- talline structures, rendering the materials more susceptible to deformation and fracture under lower stress levels. Additionally, the significant surface-to-volume ratio character- istic of nanoplastics can lead to pronounced shifts in mechanical properties, including re- ductions in hardness and strength [118, 119]. Once nanoplastics reach a certain diminutive size, it can be argued that, despite retaining a similar chemical composition, the defining properties of the original plastic may be fun- damentally altered or entirely lost. This raises a critical question, at what lower size limit can particles still be classified as nanoplastics? We also propose the importance of distinguishing between plastics as polymers and the degraded byproducts of their breakdown, i.e. oligomers that carry functional groups formed through the cleavage of C–C and C–H bonds in the parent polymer. Establishing such a concep- tual framework could help clarify the evolving nature of plastics and their transformations across different scales. Research indicates that PP particles in the 10–30 nm range can induce oxidative stress, reduce acetylcholinesterase activity, and pro- mote α-synuclein aggregation [120]. These effects are linked to severe neurological out- comes, including cognitive decline, memory deficiency, Alzheimer’s disease [121–123], and Parkinson’s disease [124–127]. Considering that endogenous fatty acids and phospholipids measure between 1–4 nm, and that phospho- lipids naturally organize into bilayers – form- ing a typical membrane thickness of approxi- mately 10 nm – we propose that the threshold distinguishing nanoplastics from oligomers should be set at around 10 nm. This distinction would provide a meaningful framework for understanding their biological and toxicolo gical impacts. Solvation-assisted desorption of approx- imately 10 nm PE oligomers is theoretically feasible within fatty tissue, a lipophilic matrix comprised primarily of triglycerides, phospho- lipids, and other lipophilic macromolecules. The translocation of, for example, PE oligomers from a surface into fatty tissue is thermody- namically favored, driven by the shift from a constrained, surface-bound state to a fully sol- vated environment. When adsorbed on a sur- face, the oligomer experiences limited, direc- tional van der Waals interactions resulting in a comparatively unstable energetic state. Con- versely, within fatty tissue at the human body temperature of ~37 °C, the oligomer engages in omnidirectional interactions with surround- ing lipids leading to a significant enthalpy gain and a substantial increase in entropy, thus low- ering its Gibbs’ free energy. The entropy factor is particularly crucial as the increased freedom of movement in the solvated state significant- ly contributes to overall thermodynamic fa- vorability. This transition, while spontaneous due to the favorable thermodynamic profile, necessitates overcoming an activation energy barrier, primarily the energy required to dis- rupt the surface constraint and initiate solva- tion. Therefore, while the process is not a ze- ro-change event, the combined influence of the enthalpy gain, the substantial increase in en- tropy, and the physiological temperature with- in the human body provides a potent driving force for the oligomer’s release and dissolution in the lipophilic matrix of fatty tissue. From an organic chemistry perspective, some of these oligomers as part of plastics’ 45https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 end-of-life products, are homologs of endog- enous fatty acids like palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acids. These endogenous fatty ac- ids are prevalent in membranes and the myelin sheath where they contribute to the synthesis of phospholipids and other lipophilic macro- molecules. Due to known enzyme promiscuity [128– 130], plastic-derived exogenous fatty acids can be utilized in the biosynthesis of phosphor- and glycolipids and subsequently incorporated into membranes and myelin sheaths. Specifically, enzymes such as acyl-CoA synthetases  [131], glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferases [132], lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferases [133], and sphingosine N-acyltransferases [134] may take up these exogenous fatty acids as sub- strates, thus altering the lipid composition of cellular structures. In particular, this could af- fect membrane fluidity, stability, and function, potentially disrupting cellular processes. The incorporation of exogenous fatty acids into myelin, particularly within the brain, has the potential to significantly impact myelin turnover and remodeling [135]. Given myelin’s highly specialized structure and composition, finely tuned to support neural function, even subtle variations in fatty acid characteristics, such as chain length, saturation, or functional groups, could disrupt its precisely tuned pro perties [136]. Thus, disruption by incorpora- tion of exogenous fatty acids may compromise myelin’s structural integrity and insulating properties, subsequently affecting axonal con- duction and neural signaling. Furthermore, the dynamic nature of myelin lipid turnover sug- gests that exogenous fatty acids could alter the rates of lipid synthesis, degradation, and recy- cling. For instance, increased susceptibility to oxidation in these exogenous fatty acids might accelerate lipid turnover due to oxidative dam- age, while inefficient integration could slow the process. Myelin remodeling, crucial for devel- opment, learning, and repair, relies on specific lipid availability; suboptimal exogenous fatty acids could hinder this process, affecting brain plasticity and recovery [137]. While some ex- ogenous fatty acids, such as certain omega-3 analogs, may exhibit neuroprotective effects, the overall impact of replacing endogenous fatty acids depends on their specific proper- ties. Consequently, these replacements could either integrate seamlessly or disrupt the deli- cate balance essential for myelin’s structure and function, further research to elucidate these complex dynamics and their implications for neural health is necessitated. Additives, leaching, and hormonal dysfunc- tion. Plastics, beyond their synthetic polymer base, commonly incorporate a diverse array of additives and fillers/reinforcements to enhance performance characteristics. These include antioxidants, stabilizers, plasticizers such as bisphenol A and phthalates, flame retardants, colorants, inorganic particles, and organic and inorganic fibers. Furthermore, residual func- tionalized monomers and oligomers of the starting materials are frequently present within the plastic matrix [138–140]. Quantifying the number of additives em- ployed in plastics is challenging due to the breadth and dynamic nature of the indus- try. However, available data indicates that thousands of chemicals are utilized in plastic production with studies suggesting figures exceeding 10,000 [139]. Notably, the availabi lity and quality of safety data for these chemi- cals are highly variable. The complex and often opaque composition of plastics further hinders 46 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY accurate quantification [141]. Consequent- ly, while a definitive number remains elusive, it is evident that a substantial proportion of these chemicals lack adequate safety data, un- derscoring the complexity of this issue and its potential detrimental effects on both the envi- ronment and human health [32, 33, 142–144]. The leaching of additive chemicals from plastics into the human body represents a sig- nificant health concern with pathways includ- ing ingestion, dermal absorption, inhalation, and medical device exposure. Within food sys- tems, additives migrate from plastic packaging and utensils, particularly under conditions of heat, acidity, or prolonged contact with fatty substances, leading to ingestion and systemic exposure [145–147]. Similarly, dermal contact with plasticized products facilitates the absorp- tion of additives through the skin, a process exacerbated prolonged exposure. Inhalation of volatile additives and micro-/nanoplastics from indoor environments and heated plastics provides another route of entry, while the use of plastic medical devices introduces direct ex- posure to internal tissues and fluids. Environ- mental contamination by micro-/nanoplastics further contributes to ingestion and inhalation exposures. The extent of leaching is influenced by factors such as temperature, pH, food/liq- uid composition, contact time, plastic type, and additive characteristics. Consequently, the potential for endocrine disruption, reproduc- tive toxicity, and other adverse health effects necessitates further research into the complex dynamics of additive leaching and its implica- tions for human health [148–150]. Due to their widespread use in plastics and resins and demonstrated endocrine-disrupting properties, bisphenols A, S, and F (Fig. 5) are among the most prevalent and concerning bi- sphenols for potential adverse human health effects [151]. Bisphenols exert their endocrine-disrupt- ing effects through multiple mechanisms, in- cluding acting as estrogen receptor agonists, mimicking endogenous estrogens or behaving as antagonists, or blocking estrogen as well as interfering with other hormone receptors, dis- rupting enzyme activity, inducing epigenetic modifications, or causing oxidative stress and inflammation thereby disrupting normal hor- monal signaling and cellular function [152]. Fig. 5. Chemical structures of the most prevalent bisphenols and major endogenous estrogens. 47https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 Literature data indicates that bisphenol ex- posure can impact both male and female fetus- es and infants, with effects varying significant- ly due to the sex-specific roles of hormones during development [153–155]. Both sexes are extremely vulnerable to developmental and biological impacts due to the sensitivity of hor- monal balance during the early stages of life. In males, prenatal and early postnatal expo- sure to bisphenols has been shown to disrupt the development of the male reproductive sys- tem, leading to reduced sperm count and im- paired sperm motility. This disruption arises from bisphenols’ interference with testosterone production and function, which is critical for spermatogenesis, and these effects are attrib- uted to their endocrine-disrupting properties. Exposure to bisphenols can also cause hormo- nal imbalances, manifesting as reduced testo sterone levels and changes in secondary sexual characteristics, described as “emasculating” effects that are linked to bisphenols’ interac- tions with androgen receptors. Additionally, altered anogenital distance (AGD), a sexually dimorphic trait influenced by prenatal andro- gen levels, may be shortened in male infants exposed to bisphenols, suggesting disrupted androgen signaling during critical develop- mental periods. Moreover, prenatal bisphenol exposure has been associated with abnormal prostate gland development, potentially in- creasing the risk of prostate-related health is- sues in adulthood, likely due to disruptions in hormonal pathways during prostate formation [156–158]. In females, bisphenol exposure can inter- fere with estrogen signaling and affect ovarian development, egg maturation, and the forma- tion of the reproductive tract. Such disruptions potentially result in long-term reproductive health problems. Prenatal bisphenol exposure may also accelerate puberty, resulting in ear- ly menarche and associated health concerns, and it may negatively affect fertility, increasing the risk of conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome. Although less studied, it is hypothe- sized that bisphenols could alter the estrogen– androgen balance, potentially increasing mus- culature in females due to disrupted hormonal signaling. Furthermore, since bisphenols’ in- terference with estrogen pathways may impair ovarian development and egg maturation, this can potentially result in infertility. Bisphenol exposure is decisive if it coincides with sen- sitive developmental windows and the effects of bisphenols can be enduring and potentially span multiple generations. Further research is required to fully understand the complex and multifaceted effects of bisphenol exposure on human development [159–161]. Phthalates, like bisphenols, are endocri ne-disrupting chemicals, but their effects dif- fer slightly in scope and mechanism. While both can interfere with hormonal processes, phthalates are particularly known for their an- ti-androgenic effects, i.e. they block or reduce the action of male hormones like testosterone [162–164]. Phthalates (Fig. 6) generally need to have a lipophilic aliphatic part in addition to their aromatic ring and carbonyl groups to function as effective endocrine disruptors, including their anti-androgenic activity. The lipophilic aliphatic chains, such as ethyl, hexyl, butyl, or benzyl groups, contribute to the hydrophobic nature of phthalates, allowing them to easily interact with lipid-rich environments like cell membranes. This property is critical for their ability to penetrate biological systems and bind to hormone receptors or disrupt enzyme 48 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY function. The aromatic ring, as well as con- tributing to chemical stability, also contributes to interaction with specific molecular targets, e.g. in binding to receptor sites or enzymes in- volved in hormonal signaling. The carbonyls of the ester groups are essential for chemical re- activity and contribute to the ability of phtha- lates to interact with biological molecules such as proteins, receptors, or enzymes involved in endocrine system regulation. While these structural elements make phthalates highly ef- fective as plasticizers, they also enable the en- docrine-disrupting properties [165,166] and the combination of these structural elements allows phthalates to interfere with hormonal balance and signaling in various ways despite phthalates being structurally different from natural hormones like testosterone and estro- gen [167]. Fig. 6. Chemical structures of most prevalent ortho-phthalates and the androgen testosterone. In male babies, prenatal exposure to phtha- lates has been linked to disrupted development of the male reproductive system. This includes reduced testosterone levels, altered AGD, and potential impacts on testicular descent and pe- nile development. Such changes may lead to fertility issues later in life including reduced sperm count and motility. The anti-androgenic properties of phthalates are a key factor in these effects [168–170]. In female babies, phthalates can disrupt estrogen signaling, potentially af- fecting ovarian development and reproductive tract formation. [171–173]. While less studied, there is evidence suggesting that phthalates 49https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 may also influence the timing of puberty and increase the risk of reproductive health issues, such as reduced fertility or hormonal imba lances [174–176]. Overall, while both bisphe- nols and phthalates disrupt hormonal systems, phthalates are more strongly associated with anti-androgenic effects, whereas bisphenols often mimic estrogen. Of particular note, the timing and level of exposure to these leached additives are critical in determining the sever- ity of their impacts. Phthalates primarily act as anti-androgens, i.e. they interfere with male hormones like testosterone rather than mi micking estrogen directly. Unlike bisphenols, which have a phenol group that allows them to mimic estrogen, phthalates lack this structural feature. However, phthalates can still disrupt hormonal signaling by binding to hormone receptors or altering hormone production. Interestingly, some studies suggest that phtha- lates may have weak estrogenic activity under certain conditions, but their primary mode of action is through blocking androgen receptors and reducing testosterone synthesis [177]. This is why their effects are often more pronounced in disrupting male reproductive development such as altering AGD and impairing testicular function. In contrast to testosterone, a steroid hor- mone with a four-ring structure, phthalates are simple diesters of phthalic acid. Phthalates ex- ert their endocrine-disrupting effects primari- ly by interfering with androgen signaling rath- er than mimicking testosterone [178] to which they are structural dissimilar and are potent anti-androgens [179]. and their disruption of the endocrine system is due to their ability to inhibit testosterone function and production. ortho-Phthalates require a combination of structural features to effectively interact with biological systems. These include a lipophilic aliphatic part, an aromatic ring, and a carbonyl group. The lipophilic aliphatic chains enhance their hydrophobic nature, allowing them to interact with lipid-rich environments, such as cell membranes, facilitating their entry into biological systems. The aromatic ring contrib- utes to their chemical stability and interac- tion with molecular targets such as hormone receptors and enzymes involved in hormonal signaling. The carbonyl of the ester function- alities is essential for their reactivity, allowing them to interact with biological molecules in- volved in endocrine processes. Phthalates also act by mechanisms such as androgen receptor interference whereby they block the binding of testosterone and other androgens to their receptors inhibiting normal androgen signa- ling pathways critical for reproductive deve lopment [180]. They can inhibit testosterone synthesis by disrupting enzymes involved in its production leading to reduced testoster- one levels. Additionally, phthalates alter the expression of genes regulated by testosterone, affecting the development of androgen-de- pendent tissues [181]. These structural and functional characteristics explain their potent anti-androgenic activity and ability to dis- rupt male reproductive development, such as reducing anogenital distance, impairing tes- ticular development, and altering secondary sexual characteristics. While phthalates differ greatly in structure from testosterone, their anti-androgenic effects arise from their ability to block and inhibit the hormonal processes regulated by androgens [182,183]. So, while phthalates don’t mimic estrogen in the same way bisphenols do, they are potent endocrine disruptors with their own unique mechanisms of action. 50 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY CONCLUSIONS. The range of health prob- lems associated with plastic, as outlined in this article, is far from exhaustive. Ongoing research continues to uncover new areas of concern and expand upon previously identified issues related to plastic exposure. Among the most alarming findings is the emerging evidence of a potential connection between plastic expo- sure and premature cognitive decline in older adults, potentially contributing to the onset or worsening of neurodegenerative diseases, in- cluding those linked to dementia. Moreover, chemicals leached from plastics, particular- ly endocrine disruptors, have been shown to cause hormonal imbalances, which may lead to the masculinization of female development and the feminization of male development. If left unaddressed, these impacts could culmi- nate in a significant and largely unanticipated environmental health crisis. This Perspective took a chemistry-based approach to enhance our understanding, ex- planation, and prediction of certain aspects of plastic-related health issues. Specifically, we in- troduced the concept of bioavailable plastic for plastic particles smaller than 2.5 μm capable of penetrating biological barriers. By examining the physicochemical properties of bioavailable plastic, it becomes evident that lipophilicity is the key property underpinning bioavailable plastic distribution within the human body and other organisms. We emphasize that plastics tend to accumulate in adipose tissues, includ- ing visceral and subcutaneous fat as well as the brain. Furthermore, we propose a mechanism of solvation-assisted desorption whereby oligo- meric molecules released from plastics in fatty tissues generate mono- and dicarboxylic acids that mimic endogenous fatty acids. These exog- enous fatty acids can integrate into the biosyn- thesis of phospholipids and glycolipids becom- ing part of cell membranes and myelin sheaths. These considerations may inspire meaningful research aimed at improving protection for neurological health in an increasingly plas- tic-laden environment; until then, the broader implications of such integration remain a sig- nificant concern. Understanding the mechanis- tic links between environmental exposure to bioavailable plastic and central nervous system disorders could pave the way for transformative policy changes and preventive measures aimed at safeguarding the health of future generations. Although plastic is ubiquitous in our envi- ronment, nevertheless one can take proactive steps to reduce exposure and minimize poten- tial health risks. One key recommendation is to limit the consumption of fatty animal products, particularly pig fat, known as salo. While salo holds significant cultural and culinary value, it appears to be one of the primary reservoirs for plastic particles smaller than 200 nm, i.e. it is a reservoir for bioavailable plastic. These parti- cles are capable of penetrating biological bar- riers in humans. To mitigate risks, salo should be consumed in mindful moderation unless it is sourced from animals raised and produced in plastic-free environments. One simple and effective way to reduce microplastic intake is by switching from bottled water to filtered tap water, which can decrease annual microplas- tic consumption from 90,000 particles to just 4,000. Other key sources of microplastic intake include the use of plastic tea bags and improp- er food storage and heating. Plastic tea bags release nanoparticles during brewing, so opt- ing for loose-leaf tea or tea bags made from natural materials is advisable. Heating food in plastic containers, especially in the microwave, can release substantial amounts of micro- and 51https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 nanoplastics. Using glass, ceramic, or stainless steel containers for storing and heating food can help avoid this issue. Additionally, choos- ing clothing made from natural fibers and us- ing laundry bags designed to catch microfibers can reduce the release of microplastics during washing. Reducing reliance on single-use plas- tics, being mindful of personal care products that contain microbeads, and engaging in reg- ular physical activities that promote sweating can also help minimize microplastic exposure as sweating can help cleanse the body of plas- tics that have already been ingested. Indeed, any activity that promotes sweating and not just physical exercise such as sauna sessions may aid in the elimination of bioavailable plas- tic. And while researchers are still investigat- ing this process, the initial findings do suggest that sweating could play a significant role in helping the body expel these unwanted parti- cles. By incorporating these practices into dai- ly routines, one can help protect oneself from the potential health risks associated with mi- croplastics. Lastly, staying informed about the latest research, educating others, and advocat- ing for policies that promote sustainable mate- rials and practices are crucial steps in reducing plastic pollution and protecting public health. By adopting these measures, we can minimize our exposure to microplastics and contribute to a healthier environment for ourselves and for future generations to come. We gratefully acknowledge the finan­ cial support from IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science (for Soloshonok). The authors acknow­ ledge the assistance of Microsoft Co­ pilot and Google Gemini for their support with Ukrainian translation. БІОДОСТУПНИЙ ПЛАСТИК: ВІД КОГНІТИВНОГО ЗАНЕПАДУ У СТАРШИХ ЛЮДЕЙ ДО ГОРМОНАЛЬНИХ ЗБОЇВ У МОЛОДШИХ Дзяньлінь Хань¹, Аліція Взорек², Карел Д. Кліка³, Таїзо Оно⁴, Вадим А. Солошонок*5,6 1 Цзянсу, Центр співінновацій ефективного оброблення та використання лісових ресурсів, Хімічний факультет, Лісотехнічний університет Нанкіна, Нанкін 210037, Китай; 2 Хімічний інститут, Університет Яна Кохановського в Кельці, вул. Університетська 7, 25–406 Кельце, Польща; 3 Центр досліджень і розроблень, Archer Daniels Midland, 1001 N Brush College Rd., Декатур, IL 62521, США 4 Національний інститут передової науки та технологій (AIST), 2266–98, Анагахора, Шімошідамі, район Моріяма, Нагоя, 463–8560, Японія; 5 Відділ органічної хімії I, Хімічний факультет, Університет Країни Басків UPV/EHU, Paseo Manuel Lardizábal 3, 20018 Сан-Себастіан, Іспанія; 6 ІКЕРБАСКЕ, Баскська наукова фундація, вул. Марія Діас де Харо 3, Площа Бізкая, 48013 Більбао, Іспанія email: vadimsoloshonok@gmail.com Присвята. Присвячується Кейсі та Каллі Мінз, відважним борцям за науку та здо- ров’я, за їхню натхненну діяльність у сфері переосмислення здорового способу життя та розширення можливостей людей конт ролювати власну метаболічну долю. 52 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Мікро/нанопластики являють собою повсюдний екологічний забруднювач із по- тенційними негативними наслідками для всіх живих організмів. Постійні досліджен- ня виявляють нові та розширюють існую- чі занепокоєння щодо впливу пластику. Зокрема, з’являються докази зв’язку між впливом пластику та передчасним когні- тивним занепадом у літніх людей, що по- тенційно сприяє розвитку або загостренню нейродегенеративних захворювань, пов’я- заних із деменцією. Крім цього, хімічні ре- човини, отримані з пластику, є особливо руйнівними в ендокринному плані і пов’я- зані з гормональними порушеннями, що потенційно призводить до маскулінізації розвитку жінок та фемінізації розвитку чо- ловіків. Якщо ці наслідки не будуть пом’як- шені, вони можуть спричинити значну та непередбачену екологічну кризу здоров’я. У цій перспективній статті використа- но хімічний підхід для роз’яснення питань, пов’язаних зі здоров’ям, які виникають через пластик, вводячи поняття «біодо- ступний пластик» – це частинки розміром менше 2,5 мікронів, здатні проникати через біологічні бар’єри. Ми підкреслюємо ліпо- фільність як ключову фізико-хімічну влас- тивість, що визначає розподіл цих части- нок в організмах, наголошуючи на їхньому накопиченні в жировій тканині, включаю- чи мозок. Крім цього, ми пропонуємо меха- нізм сольватаційно-асистованої десорбції, за яким олігомерні молекули, що вивіль- няються з пластику в жирових тканинах, утворюють моно- та дикарбонові кислоти, що імітують ендогенні жирні кислоти. Ці екзогенні жирні кислоти можуть інтегру- ватися в біосинтез фосфоліпідів та гліко- ліпідів, стаючи компонентами клітинних мембран та мієлінових оболонок. Ці мір- кування повинні стимулювати досліджен- ня, спрямовані на захист неврологічного здоров’я в умовах все більш насиченого пластиком середовища, хоча ширші наслід- ки цієї інтеграції викликають значне зане- покоєння. Механістичне розуміння зв’язку між впливом біодоступного пластику та розладами центральної нервової системи (ЦНС) є вирішальним для інформуван- ня трансформаційних політичних змін та профілактичних заходів, спрямованих на захист здоров’я майбутніх поколінь. Щоб надати читачам дієві стратегії для зменшен- ня впливу пластику, ми пропонуємо кілька рекомендацій. Зокрема, рекомендовано обмежити споживання жирних продуктів тваринного походження, особливо свиня- чого сала. Хоча сало є культурно значущим продуктом, воно, напевно, є основним ре- зервуаром біодоступних частинок пласти- ку, особливо розміром менше 200 нм. Ці наночастинки, через їхню здатність про- никати через біологічні бар’єри людини, становлять значний ризик. Цей огляд має на меті підкреслити критичну необхідність комплексних досліджень довгострокових наслідків мікропластику для здоров’я лю- дини, висвітлюючи його повсюдне поши- рення та потенційні приховані небезпеки. Ключові слова: біодоступний пластик, мікро-нанопластики, екологічні забрудню- вачі, екологічна криза здоров’я, системне забруднення, розподіл розмірів частинок, проникнення через біологічні бар’єри, когнітивний занепад, нейротоксичність, пластикові добавки, бісфеноли, фталати, гормональні порушення, ендокринна си- стема, ліпофільність, ліпідо-опосередко- ваний транспорт, накопичення в жировій тканині, сало (український солений жир), сольватаційно-асистована десорбція, ендо- генні/екзогенні жирні кислоти. 53https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 REFERENCES [1] Meikle J.L. American plastic: a cultural histo- ry. Rutgers University Press; 1995. [2] Abrahms-Kavunenko S. Toward an anthropo logy of plastics. J. Material Culture. 2023. 28(1): 3–23. doi.org/10.1177/1359183521106. [3] Blaszczyk R.L. From invention to metaphor: plastics and American culture. American Quarterly. 1997. 49(3): 640–649. doi.org/10.1353/aq.1997.0024. [4] Dokl M., Copot A., Krajnc D. et al. Global projections of plastic use, end-of-life fate and potential changes in consumption, reduction, recycling and replacement with bioplastics to 2050. Sustainable Production and Consump- tion. 2024. 51: 498–518. doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.025. [5] Urrutia-Pereira M., Camargos P.A., Solé D. Microplastics: the hidden danger. J. Pediatria. 2024. 14: 10–17. doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2024.10.004. [6] Meikle J.L. Material doubts: the consequences of plastic. Environmental History. 1997. 2(3): 278-300. doi.org/10.2307/3985351. [7] North E.J., Halden R.U. Plastics and environ- mental health: the road ahead. Reviews Envi- ronmental Health. 2013. 28(1): 1–8. doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0030. [8] Lang T., Jelić F., Wechselberger C. From Cra- dle to Grave: Microplastics – A Dangerous Legacy for Future Generations. Environments. 2024. 11(12): 263. doi.org/10.3390/environments11120263. [9] Nielsen T.D., Hasselbalch J., Holmberg K., Stripple J. Politics and the plastic crisis: A re- view throughout the plastic life cycle. Wiley In- terdiscip. Rev.: Energy Environment. 2020. 9(1): e360. doi.org/10.1002/wene.360. [10] Lithner D., Larsson Å., Dave G. Environmen- tal and health hazard ranking and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical com- position. Science Total Environment. 2011. 409(18): 3309–3324. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.038. [11] Kibria M.G., Masuk N.I., Safayet R. et al. Plas- tic waste: challenges and opportunities to mi tigate pollution and effective management. In- ternat. J Environmental Research. 2023. 17(1): 20. doi: 10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z. [12] Aves A.R., Revell L.E., Gaw, S. et al. First Evi- dence of Microplastics in Antarctic Snow. Cry- osphere 2022. 16(6): 2127–2145. DOI: 10.5194/tc-16-2127-2022 [13] Bergmann M., Collard F., Fabres J. et al. Plastic Pollution in the Arctic. Nat. Rev. Earth Envi- ron. 2022. 3(5): 323–337. DOI: 10.1038/s43017-022-00279-8. [14] Zhang Y., Gao T., Kang S. et al. Cryosphere as a temporal sink and source of microplastics in the Arctic region. Geoscience Frontiers. 2023. 14(4): 101566. doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101566. [15] Abel S.M., Wu F., Primpke S. et al. Journey to the deep: plastic pollution in the hadal of deep-sea trenches. Environmental Pollution. 2023. 333: 122078. doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122078. [16] Napper I.E., Davies B.F.R., Clifford H. et al. Reaching New Heights in Plastic Pollution - Preliminary Findings of Microplastics on Mount Everest. One Earth. 2020. 3(5): 621– 630. DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.10.020. [17] Chen Y., Jing S., Wang Y. et al. Quantification and characterization of fine plastic particles as considerable components in atmospheric fine particles. Environmental Science Technol. 2024. 58(10): 4691–703. doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06832. [18] Brandon J.A., Jones W., Ohman M.D. Multi decadal increase in plastic particles in coastal ocean sediments. Science Advances. 2019. 5(9): eaax0587. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax05. [19] Martin C., Young C.A., Valluzzi L., Duarte C.M. Ocean sediments as the global sink for marine micro‐and mesoplastics. Limnolog. Oceanog. Lett. 2022. 7(3): 235–243. 54 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10257. [20] Cressey D. The plastic ocean. Nature. 2016. 536(7616): 263–265. doi.org/10.1038/536263a. [21] Wayman C., Niemann H. The fate of plastic in the ocean environment–a minireview. En- vironmental Science: Processes Impacts. 2021. 23(2): 198–212. DOI: 10.1039/D0EM00446D. [22] Amato-Lourenço L.F., Carvalho-Oliveira R., Júnior G.R. et al. Presence of airborne micro plastics in human lung tissue. J. Hazard. Ma- ter. 2021. 416: 126124. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126124. [23] Feng Y., Tu C., Li R. et al. A systematic review of the impacts of exposure to micro-and na- no-plastics on human tissue accumulation and health. Eco-Environment Health. 2023. 2(4): 195–207. doi.org/10.1016/j.eehl.2023.08.002. [24] Aristizabal M., Jiménez‐Orrego K.V., Caice- do‐León M.D. et al. Microplastics in derma- tology: Potential effects on skin homeostasis. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2024. 23(3): 766–772. doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16167. [25] Yee M.S., Hii L.W., Looi C.K. et al. Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on human health. Nanomaterials. 2021. 11(2): 496. doi.org/10.3390/nano11020496. [26] Li P., Liu J. Micro (nano) plastics in the human body: sources, occurrences, fates, and health risks. Environmental Science Technol. 2024. 58(7): 3065–3078. doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c08902. [27] Gopinath P.M., Parvathi V.D., Yoghalakshmi N. et al. Plastic particles in medicine: A systema tic review of exposure and effects to human health. Chemosphere. 2022. 303: 135227. Doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135227. [28] Vethaak A.D., Legler J. Microplastics and hu- man health. Science. 2021. 371(6530): 672–674. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe5041. [29] Wang Y.L., Lee Y.H., Chiu I.J. et al. Potent im- pact of plastic nanomaterials and micromate- rials on the food chain and human health. Int. J Mol. Science. 2020. 21(5): 1727. doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051727. [30] Woo H., Seo K., Choi Y. et al. Methods of ana- lyzing microsized plastics in the environment. Applied Sciences. 2021. 11(22): 10640. doi.org/10.3390/app112210640. [31] Lindeque P.K., Cole M., Coppock R.L. et al. Are we underestimating microplastic abun- dance in the marine environment? A compar- ison of microplastic capture with nets of dif- ferent mesh-size. Environmen. Pollution. 2020. 265: 114721. doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114721. [32] Meeker J.D., Sathyanarayana S., Swan S.H. Phthalates and other additives in plastics: hu- man exposure and associated health outcomes. Philosoph. Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biolog. Sciences. 2009. 364(1526): 2097–113. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0268. [33] Chen Y., Chen Q., Zhang Q. et al. An overview of chemical additives on (micro) plastic fibers: occurrence, release, and health risks. Rev. En- viron. Contam. Toxicol. 2022. 260(1): 22. Doi: org/10.1007/s44169-022-00023-9. [34] Vincoff S., Schleupner B., Santos J. et al. The known and unknown: Investigating the car- cinogenic potential of plastic additives. Envi- ron. Science Tech. 2024. 58(24): 10445–10457. doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06840. [35] Chamas A., Moon H., Zheng J. et al. Degrada- tion rates of plastics in the environment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Engin. 2020. 8(9): 3494–3511. doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635. [36] Bermúdez J.R., Swarzenski P.W. A microplas- tic size classification scheme aligned with uni- versal plankton survey methods. Methods X. 2021. 8: 101516. doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101516. [37] Geyer R,. Jambeck J.R., Law K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Adv. 2017. 3(7): e1700782. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782. [38] Nakajima-Kambe T., Shigeno-Akutsu Y., No- mura N. et al. Microbial degradation of poly urethane, polyester polyurethanes and poly- ether polyurethanes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 55https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 1999. 51: 134–140. doi.org/10.1007/s002530051373. [39] Liu J., He J, Xue R., Xu B. et al. Biodegradation and up-cycling of polyurethanes: Progress, challenges, and prospects. Biotech. Adv. 2021. 48: 107730. doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107730. [40] Stukowski A., Arsenlis A. On the elastic–plas- tic decomposition of crystal deformation at the atomic scale. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2012. 20(3): 035012. DOI 10.1088/0965-0393/20/3/035012. [41] Singh B., Sharma N. Mechanistic implications of plastic degradation. Polymer Deg. Stability. 2008. 93(3): 561–584. doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.11. 008. [42] Larsen H.A., Drickamer H.G. Mechanical de gradation and cross linking of polymers by plastic deformation at high pressure. J. Phys. Chem. 1957. 61(12): 1643–1646. doi.org/10.1021/j150558a019. [43] Ravishankar K., Ramesh P.S., Sadhasivam  B., Raghavachari D. Wear-induced mechanical degradation of plastics by low-energy wet- grinding. Polymer Degrad. Stab. 2018. 158: 212–219. doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.10. 026. [44] Xu F., Wang B., Yang D. Thermal degradation of typical plastics under high heating rate con- ditions by TG-FTIR: Pyrolysis behaviors and kinetic analysis. Energy Conversion Manag. 2018. 171: 1106–1115. doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.047. [45] Das P., Tiwari P. Thermal degradation kinetics of plastics and model selection. Thermochim. Acta. 2017. 654: 191–202. doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2017.06.001. [46] Sun J., Zheng H., Xiang H. et al. The surface degradation and release of microplastics from plastic films studied by UV radiation and me- chanical abrasion. Science Total Envir. 2022. 838: 156369. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156369. [47] Doğan M. Ultraviolet light accelerates the deg- radation of polyethylene plastics. Micros. Res. Technique. 2021. 84(11): 2774–2783. doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23838. [48] Taghavi N., Zhuang W.Q., Baroutian S. En- hanced biodegradation of non-biodegradable plastics by UV radiation: Part 1. J Environ. Chem. Engin. 2021. 9(6): 106464. doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106464. [49] Elsawy M.A., Kim K.H., Park J.W., Deep A. Hydrolytic degradation of polylactic acid (PLA) and its composites. Renew. Sustain. En- ergy Rev. 2017. 79:1346–1352. doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.143. [50] Sivan A. New perspectives in plastic bio- degradation. Current Opin. Biotech. 2011. 22(3): 422–426. doi.org/10.1016/j.cop- bio.2011.01.013. [51] Mortezaeikia V., Tavakoli O., Khodaparasti M.S. A review on kinetic study approach for pyrolysis of plastic wastes using thermogravi- metric analysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2021. 160: 105340. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105340. [52] Han Y., Wei M., Shi X. et al. Effects of tensile stress and soil burial on mechanical and che mical degradation potential of agricultural plastic films. Sustainability. 2020. 12(19): 7985. doi.org/10.3390/su12197985. [53] Corcoran P.L., Biesinger M.C., Grifi M. Plas- tics and beaches: a degrading relationship. Marine Pollut. Bull. 2009. 58(1): 80–84. doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.08.022. [54] Bullard J.E., Zhou Z., Davis S., Fowler S. Break- down and modification of microplastic beads by aeolian abrasion. Environ. Science Tech. 2022. 57(1): 76–84. doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05396. [55] Geddes W.C. Mechanism of PVC degradation. Rubber Chem. Tech. 1967. 40(1): 177–216. doi.org/10.5254/1.3539041. [56] Persico P., Ambrogi V., Acierno D., Carfagna C. Processability and mechanical properties of commercial PVC plastisols containing low‐en- vironmental‐impact plasticizers. J. Vinyl Add. Tech. 2009. 15(3): 139–146. doi.org/10.1002/vnl.20187. 56 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY [57] Min K., Cuiffi J.D., Mathers R.T. Ranking en- vironmental degradation trends of plastic ma- rine debris based on physical properties and molecular structure. Nature Commun. 2020. 11(1): 727. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14538-z. [58] Chamas A., Moon H., Zheng J. et al. Degrada- tion rates of plastics in the environment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Engineer. 2020. 8(9): 3494– 3511. doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635. [59] Lambert S., Wagner M. Characterisation of nanoplastics during the degradation of poly- styrene. Chemosphere. 2016. 145: 265. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.078. [60] Ter Halle A., Ladirat L., Gendre X. et al. Un- derstanding the fragmentation pattern of ma- rine plastic debris. Environ. Science Technol. 2016. 50(11): 5668–5675. doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00594. [61] Rowenczyk L., Dazzi A., Deniset-Besseau A. et al. Microstructure characterization of oceanic polyethylene debris. Environ. Science Technol. 2020. 54(7): 4102–4109. doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07061. [62] Prunier J., Maurice L., Perez E. et al. Trace met- als in polyethylene debris from the North At- lantic subtropical gyre. Environ. Pollut. 2019. 245: 371–379. doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.043. [63] Kye H., Yoon Y., Hwang T.M. Changes in phy sical and chemical properties of microplastics by ozonation. Process Safety Environ. Protec. 2024. 192: 1062–1072. doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.10.044. [64] Ryan P.G., Moore C.J., Van Franeker J.A., Moloney C.L. Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment. Phi- losoph. Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Scien. 2009. 364(1526): 1999–2012. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0207. [65] Costa M.F., Ivar do Sul J.A., Silva-Cavalcanti J.S. et al. On the importance of size of plas- tic fragments and pellets on the strandline: a snapshot of a Brazilian beach. Environ. Moni- tor. Asses. 2010. 168: 299–304. doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1113-4. [66] Koelmans A.A., Besseling E., Shim W.J. Nano plastics in the aquatic environment. Critical review. Marine Anthrop. Litter. 2015. 325–340. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_12. [67] Moore C.J. Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environ. Res. 2008. 108(2): 131–139. doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.025. [68] Browne M.A., Galloway T., Thompson R. Mi- croplastic – an emerging contaminant of po- tential concern? Integ. Environ. Asses. Manag. 2007. 3(4): 559–561. doi.org/10.1002/ieam.5630030411. [69] Desforges J.P., Galbraith M., Dangerfield N., Ross P.S. Widespread distribution of microplastics in subsurface seawater in the NE Pac. Ocean. Ma- rine Pollut. Bull. 2014. 79(1–2): 94–99. doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.035. [70] Wagner M., Scherer C., Alvarez-Muñoz D. et al. Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know. En- viron. Scien. Eur. 2014. 26: 1–9. doi.org/10.1186/s12302-014-0012-7. [71] Fang C., Luo Y., Naidu R. Microplastics and nanoplastics analysis: options, imaging, ad- vancements and challenges. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023. 166: 117158. doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117158. [72] Gigault J., Ter Halle A., Baudrimont M. et al. Current opinion: what is a nanoplastic? Envi- ron. Pollut. 2018. 235: 1030–1034. doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.024. [73] Tucker W.G. An overview of PM2. 5 sources and control strategies. Fuel Proces. Technol. 2000. 65: 379–392. doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00105-8. [74] Xing Y.F., Xu Y.H., Shi M.H., Lian Y.X. The im- pact of PM2. 5 on the human respiratory sys- tem. J. Thoracic Disease. 2016. 8(1): E69. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.19. [75] Lim C.H., Ryu J., Choi Y. et al. Understanding global PM2. 5 concentrations and their drivers in recent decades (1998–2016). Environ. Int. 2020. 144: 106011. doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106011. 57https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 [76] Apte J.S., Marshall J.D., Cohen A.J., Brauer M. Addressing global mortality from ambient PM2. 5. Environ. Science Tech. 2015. 49(13): 8057–8066. doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01236. [77] Wu C.H., Dang T.T., Mutuku J.K. et al. Evalu- ation of PM2. 5 bound microplastics and plas- tic additives in several cities in Taiwan: Spatial distribution and human health risk. Science Total Environ. 2025. 959: 178213. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178213. [78] Huang Z., Weng Y., Shen Q. et al. Nano-and micro-polystyrene plastics interfered the gut barrier function mediated by exosomal miRNAs in rats. Environ. Pollut. 2023. 335: 122275. doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122275. [79] Dzierżyński E., Gawlik P.J., Puźniak D. et al. Microplastics in the human body: Exposure, detection, and risk of carcinogenesis: A state- of-the-art review. Cancers. 2024. 16(21): 3703. doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213703. [80] Hamilton R.D., Foss A.J., Leach L. Establish- ment of a human in vitro model of the outer blood–retinal barrier. J. Anat. 2007. 211(6): 707–716. doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00812.x. [81] Peng Y., He Q. Reproductive toxicity and rela ted mechanisms of micro (nano) plastics in terrestrial mammals: Review of current evi- dence. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety. 2024. 279: 116505. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116505. [82] Bai C.L., Wang D., Luan Y.L. et al. A review on micro-and nanoplastics in humans: Implication for their translocation of barriers and potential health effects. Chemosphere. 2024. 142424. doi. org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142424. [83] Jiang J., Shu Z., Qiu L. Adverse effects and po- tential mechanisms of polystyrene microplas- tics (PS-MPs) on the blood-testis barrier. Envi- ron. Geochem. Health. 2024. 46(7): 238. doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02033-z. [84] Kim Y.H., Kim E., Moon B. et al. Polystyrene Nanoplastics (50 nm) Exposure Induce P-Gly- coprotein Affect at the Blood-Brain Barrier and Blood–CSF Barrier Cells. Preprints 2024. doi: 10.20944/preprints202411.2088.v1. [85] Zhang W., Mehta A., Tong Z. et al. Develop- ment of polymeric nanoparticles for blood– brain barrier transfer—strategies and chal- lenges. Adv. Scien. 2021. 8(10): 2003937. doi.org/10.1002/advs.202003937. [86] Kopatz V., Wen K., Kovács T. et al. Micro-and nanoplastics breach the blood–brain barrier (BBB): Biomolecular corona’s role revealed. Nanomaterials. 2023 13(8): 1404. doi.org/10.3390/nano13081404. [87] Prüst M., Meijer J., Westerink R.H. The plastic brain: neurotoxicity of micro-and nanoplas- tics. Particle Fibre Toxicol. 2020. 17: 1–6. doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00358-y. [88] Roduner E. Size matters: Why nanomaterials are different. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006. 35: 583. doi.org/10.1039/b502142c. [89] Hanachi P., Khoshnamvand M., Walker T.R., Hamidian A.H. Nano sized polystyrene plas- tics toxicity to microalgae Chlorella vulgaris: Toxicity mitigation using humic acid. Aquatic Toxicol. 2022. 245: 106123. doi. org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2022.106123. [90] Ishtaweera P., Ray C.L., Filley W. et al. Nano plastics Extraction from Water by Hydropho- bic Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Appl. Engin. Materials. 2024. 2(6): 1460–1466. doi.org/10.1021/acsaenm.4c00159. [91] Jackson E., Shoemaker R., Larian N., Cassis L. Adipose tissue as a site of toxin accumulation. Comprehens. Physiol. 2017. 7(4): 1085. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c160038. [92] Rolle-Kampczyk U., Gebauer S., Haange S.B. et al. Accumulation of distinct persistent or- ganic pollutants is associated with adipose tis- sue inflammation. Science Total Environ. 2020. 748: 142458. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142458. [93] Du J., Hu Y., Hou M. et al. Combined effects of high-fat diet and polystyrene microplastic ex- posure on microplastic bioaccumulation and lipid metabolism in zebrafish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2023 137: 108803. doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2023.108803. 58 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY [94] Guerrera M.C., Aragona M., Porcino C. et al. Micro and nano plastics distribution in fish as model organisms: histopathology, blood response and bioaccumulation in different or- gans. Appl. Scien. 2021. 11(13): 5768. doi.org/10.3390/app11135768. [95] Moon H., Jeong D., Choi J.W. et al. Microplas- tic exposure linked to accelerated aging and impaired adipogenesis in fat cells. Scien. Re- ports. 2024. 14(1): 23920. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74892-6. [96] Heindel J.J., Lustig R.H., Howard S., Corkey B.E. Obesogens: a unifying theory for the glob- al rise in obesity. Int. J. Obesity. 2024. 48(4): 449–460. doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01460-3. [97] Polder A., Savinova T.N., Tkachev A. et al. Levels and patterns of Persistent Organic Pol- lutants (POPS) in selected food items from Northwest Russia (1998–2002) and implica- tions for dietary exposure. Scien. Total Envi- ron. 2010. 408(22): 5352–5361. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.036. [98] Shen H., Henkelmann B., Rambeck W.A. et al. Physiologically based persistent organic pol- lutant accumulation in pig tissues and their edible safety differences: an in vivo study. Food Chem. 2012. 132(4): 1830–5. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.12.015. [99] Domingo J.L. Concentrations of environmen- tal organic contaminants in meat and meat products and human dietary exposure: A re- view. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017. 107: 20–26. doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.06.032. [100] Guo W., Pan B., Sakkiah S. et al. Persistent organic pollutants in food: contamination sources, health effects and detection me thods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019. 16(22): 4361. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224361. [101] O’Brien J.S., Sampson E.L. Lipid composi- tion of the normal human brain: gray mat- ter, white matter, and myelin. J. Lipid Res. 1965. 6(4): 537–544. DOI: 10.1016/S0022- 2275(20)39619-X. [102] Alfano A. Big role for fat in brain evolution. Scien. Am. Mind. 2015. 26(4): 715–717. Doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0715-17. [103] Guo R., Yang K., Liu Y. Explaining the hu- man and cultural puzzles: A new develop- ment theory. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2020. 155: 119971. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119971. [104] Boullerne A.I. The history of myelin. Exper- im. Neurol. 2016. 283: 431–445. doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.06.005. [105] Stadelmann C., Timmler S., Barrantes-Fre- er A., Simons M. Myelin in the central ner vous system: structure, function, and pathol- ogy. Physiol. Rev. 2019. 99(3): 1381–1431. doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2018. [106] Kister A, Kister I. Overview of myelin, ma- jor myelin lipids, and myelin-associated pro- teins. Frontiers Chem. 2023. 10:1041961. doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.1041961. [107] Spector A.A. Essentiality of fatty acids. Li- pids. 1999. 34(1): 1–3. doi.org/10.1007/BF02562220. [108] Eibl H. Phospholipids as functional constitu- ents of biomembranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 1984. 23(4): 257–271. doi.org/10.1002/anie.198402573. [109] Xie J., Sun Y., Ma Y. et al. Blood-brain bar- rier damage accelerates the accumulation of micro-and nanoplastics in the human central nervous system. J. Hazar. Mat. 2024. 480: 136028. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136028. [110] Zheng Y., Xu S., Liu J., Liu Z. The effects of micro-and nanoplastic on the central ner vous system: A New Threat to Humanity? Toxicol. 2024. 153799. doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2024.153799. [111] Moiniafshari K., Zanut A., Tapparo A. et al. A Perspective on the Potential Impact of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on the Hu- man Central Nervous System. Environ. Sci- en.: Nano. 2025. DOI: 10.1039/D4EN01017E. [112] Ganan-Calvo A.M. Human bioaccumula- tion of micro-and nanoplastics is primarily determined by the organs’ vascular volume. 59https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 medRxiv. 2024. 2010. doi: doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.01.24314502. [113] Krishnan K. A systematic review on the im- pact of micro-nanoplastics exposure on hu- man health and diseases. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 202. 13(4): 1–2. doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC134.381. [114] González-Caballero M.C., de Alba Gon zález  M., Torres-Ruiz M. et al. Internaliza- tion and toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics on inmortalized human neural stem cells. Chemosphere. 2024. 355: 141815. doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141815. [115] Nihart A.J., Garcia M.A., El Hayek E. et al. Bioaccumulation of microplastics in dece- dent human brains. Nature Med. 2025. 3: 1–6. doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03453-1. [116] Guo X., Wang J. Sorption of antibiotics onto aged microplastics in freshwater and seawa- ter. Marine Poll. Bull. 2019. 149: 110511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.11 0511. [117] Grossman R.F., Lutz Jr J.T., editors. Polymer modifiers and additives. CRC press; 2000 Nov 8. [118] Tallec K., Blard O., González-Fernández C. et al. Surface functionalization determines behavior of nanoplastic solutions in model aquatic environments. Chemosphere. 2019. 225: 639–646. doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.077. [119] Ter Halle A., Ghiglione J.F. Nanoplastics: A complex, polluting Terra incognita. Environ. Scien. Tech. 2021. 55: 14466–14469. doi. org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04142. [120] Yang G., Gong C., Zheng X. et al. Early clues and molecular mechanism involved in neu- rodegenerative diseases induced in immature mice by combined exposure to polypropy lene microplastics and DEHP. Environ. Poll. 2023. 336: 122406. doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122406. [121] Zhu Y., Wu Y., Shi L. et al. Association of plas- tic exposure with cognitive function among Chinese older adults. J. Alzheimer’s Disease. 2024. 101(3): 1015–1025. doi.org/10.3233/JAD-240746. [122] Wang G., Lin Y., Shen H. Exposure to poly- styrene microplastics promotes the progres- sion of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease: association with induction of mi- croglial pyroptosis. Molec. Neurobiol. 2024. 61(2): 900–907. doi.org/10.1007/s12035-023-03625-z. [123] Gou X., Fu Y., Li J. et al. Impact of nanoplas- tics on Alzheimer’s disease: Enhanced am- yloid-β peptide aggregation and augment- ed neurotoxicity. J. Hazar. Mat. 2024 465: 133518. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133518. [124] Jeong A., Park S.J., Lee E.J., Kim K.W. Nano- plastics exacerbate Parkinson’s disease symp- toms in C. elegans and human cells. J. Hazar. Mat. 2024. 465: 133289. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133289. [125] Liu Z., Sokratian A., Duda A.M. et al. Ani- onic nanoplastic contaminants promote Par- kinson’s disease–associated α-synuclein ag- gregation. Scien. Adv. 2023. 9(46): 8716. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi8716. [126] Liang B., Huang Y., Zhong Y. et al. Brain sin- gle-nucleus transcriptomics highlights that polystyrene nanoplastics potentially induce Parkinson’s disease-like neurodegeneration by causing energy metabolism disorders in mice. J. Hazar. Mat. 2022. 430: 128459. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128459. [127] Abdulrahman A. Investigating the link be- tween microplastic exposure (benzyl butyl phthalate) and neurodegenerative diseases using high-performance computational toxi cology. Toxicol. Res. 2025. 14(1): 211. doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfae211. [128] Hult K., Berglund P. Enzyme promiscuity: mechanism and applications. Trends Biotech- nol. 2007. 25(5): 231–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.03.002. [129] Tawfik O.K. Enzyme promiscuity: a mech- anistic and evolutionary perspective. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2010. 79(1): 471–505. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-030409- 143718. 60 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY [130] Copley S.D. Shining a light on enzyme pro miscuity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2017. 47: 167–75. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2017.11.001. [131] Digel M., Ehehalt R., Stremmel W., Fülle- krug J. Acyl-CoA synthetases: fatty acid up- take and metabolic channeling. Molec. Cell. Biochem. 2009. 326: 23–8. doi.org/10.1007/s11010-008-0003-3. [132] Gimeno R.E., Cao J. Thematic review series: glycerolipids. Mammalian glycerol-3-phos- phate acyltransferases: new genes for an old activity. J. Lipid Res. 2008. 49(10): 2079–88. doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R800013-JLR200. [133] Harayama T., Shindou H., Shimizu T. Bio- synthesis of phosphatidylcholine by human lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 1. J Lipid Res. 2009. 50(9): 1824–1831. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M800500-JLR200. [134] Rahman I.A., Tsuboi K., Uyama T., Ueda N. New players in the fatty acyl ethanolamide metabolism. Pharmacol. Res. 2014. 86: 1–10. doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2014.04.001. [135] Williamson J.M., Lyons D.A. Myelin dynam- ics throughout life: an ever-changing land- scape? Front. Cell. Neuroscien. 2018. 12: 424. doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00424. [136] Osso L.A., Hughes E.G. Dynamics of ma- ture myelin. Nature Neuroscien. 2024. 27(8): 1449–1461. doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01642-2. [137] Chang K.J., Redmond S.A., Chan J.R. Re- modeling myelination: implications for mechanisms of neural plasticity. Nature Neu- roscien. 2016. 19(2): 190–197. doi.org/10.1038/nn.4200. [138] Coleman E.A. Plastics additives. In: Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook 2017 Jan 1 (pp. 489–500). William Andrew Publishing. [139] Pritchard G. Plastics additives: an AZ ref- erence. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012 Dec 6. [140] Beach E.S., Weeks B.R., Stern R., Anastas P.T. Plastics additives and green chemistry. Pure Appl. Chem. 2013. 85(8): 1611–1624. doi.org/10.1351/PAC-CON-12-08-08. [141] Pfaendner R. How will additives shape the future of plastics? Polymer Degrad. Stab. 2006. 91(9): 2249–2256. doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.10. 017 [142] Deanin R.D. Additives in plastics. Environ. Health Perspec. 1975. 11: 35–9. doi.org/10.1289/ehp.75113. [143] Kumar P. Role of plastics on human health. Ind. J. Pediat. 2018. 85(5): 384–389. doi.org/10.1007/s12098-017-2595-7. [144] Halden R.U. Plastics and health risks. Ann. Rev. Pub. Health. 2010. 31(1): 179–194. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809. 103714. [145] Koelmans A.A., Besseling E., Foekema E.M. Leaching of plastic additives to marine or- ganisms. Environ. Poll. 2014. 187: 49–54. doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.013. [146] Luo H., Liu C., He D. et al. Effects of aging on environmental behavior of plastic additives: Migration, leaching, and ecotoxicity. Scien. Total Environ. 2022. 849: 157951. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157951 [147] Bridson J.H., Gaugler E.C., Smith D.A. et al. Leaching and extraction of additives from plastic pollution to inform environmental risk: a multidisciplinary review of analytical approaches. J. Hazar. Mat. 2021. 414: 125571. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125571. [148] Suhrhoff T.J., Scholz-Böttcher B.M. Quali- tative impact of salinity, UV radiation and turbulence on leaching of organic plastic ad- ditives from four common plastics – A lab experiment. Marine Poll. Bull. 2016. 102(1): 84–94. doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.054. [149] Bridson J.H., Abbel R., Smith D.A. et al. Im- pact of accelerated weathering on the leach- ing kinetics of stabiliser additives from mi- croplastics. J. Hazar. Mat. 2023. 459: 132303. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132303. [150] Andrady A.L., Rajapakse N. Additives and chemicals in plastics. Hazar. Chem. Associ. Plastics Marine Environ. 2019. 1–7. doi.org/10.1007/698_2016_124. 61https://ucj.org.ua Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel D. Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim A. Soloshonok UCJ № 5 / Vol. 91 [151] Gao D., Junaid M., Chen X. et al. Interaction of micro (nano) plastics and bisphenols in the environment: A recent perspective on adsorption mechanisms, influencing factors and ecotoxic impacts. Trends Anal. Chem. 2023. 165: 117132. doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117132. [152] Matsushima A., Liu X., Okada H. et al. Bi- sphenol AF is a full agonist for the estrogen receptor ERα but a highly specific antago- nist for ERβ. Environ. Health Perspec. 2010. 118(9): 1267–1272. doi.org/10.1289/ehp.09018. [153] Jing J., Pu Y., Gingrich J., Veiga-Lopez A. Gestational exposure to bisphenol A and bisphenol S leads to fetal skeletal muscle hy- pertrophy independent of sex. Toxicol. Scien. 2019. 172(2): 292–302. doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfz198. [154] Pu Y., Gingrich J.D., Steibel J.P., Veiga-Lo pez  A. Sex-specific modulation of fetal adi pogenesis by gestational bisphenol A and bisphenol S exposure. Endocrinol. 2017. 158(11): 3844–3858. doi.org/10.1210/en.2017-00615. [155] N’Tumba-Byn T., Moison D., Lacroix M. et al. Differential effects of bisphenol A and di- ethylstilbestrol on human, rat and mouse fe- tal leydig cell function. PloS one. 2012. 7(12): e51579. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051579. [156] Hart R.J. The impact of prenatal exposure to bisphenol A on male reproductive function. Front. Endocrinol. 2020. 11: 320. doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00320. [157] Lukasiewicz M., Czerniecki J., Ponikwicka- Tyszko D. et al. Placenta is capable of protect- ing the male fetus from exposure to environ- mental bisphenol A. Exposure Health. 2021. 13: 1–4. doi.org/10.1007/s12403-020-00358-5. [158] Fisher B.G., Thankamony A., Mendiola J. et al. Maternal serum concentrations of bisphe- nol A and propyl paraben in early pregnan- cy are associated with male infant genital development. Human Reprod. 2020. 35(4): 913–928. doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa045. [159] Mikołajewska K., Stragierowicz J., Gromad zińska J. Bisphenol A–Application, sources of exposure and potential risks in infants, children and pregnant women. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2015. 28(2): 209–241. DOI:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00343. [160] Fouyet S., Olivier E., Leproux P. et al. Bisphe- nol A, bisphenol F, and bisphenol S: the bad and the ugly. Where is the good? Life. 2021. 11(4): 314. doi.org/10.3390/life11040314. [161] Pivonello C., Muscogiuri G., Nardone A. et al. Bisphenol A: an emerging threat to female fertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020. 18: 1–33. doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0558-8. [162] Huang P.C., Kuo P.L., Chou Y.Y. et al. Asso- ciation between prenatal exposure to phtha- lates and the health of newborns. Environ. Int. 2009. 35(1): 14–20. doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.05.012. [163] Lottrup G., Andersson A.M., Leffers H. et al. Possible impact of phthalates on infant re- productive health. Int. J. Androl. 2006. 29(1): 172–80. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00642.x. [164] Frederiksen H., Skakkebaek N.E., Andersson A.M. Metabolism of phthalates in humans. Molec. Nutrit. Food Res. 2007. 51(7): 899– 911. doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200600243. [165] Qureshi M.S., Yusoff A.R., Wirzal M.D. et al. Methods for the determination of endo- crine-disrupting phthalate esters. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2016. 46(2): 146–159. doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2015.1004157. [166] Ahn C., Jeung E.B. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and disease endpoints. Int. J. Mo lec. Scien. 2023. 24(6): 5342. doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065342. [167] Sheikh I.A., Turki R.F., Abuzenadah A.M. et al. Endocrine disruption: computational per- spectives on human sex hormone-binding globulin and phthalate plasticizers. PloS one. 62 ISSN 2708-129X. Укр. хім. журн., 2025 BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG.ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Cтаття надійшла 05.04.2025. 2016. 11(3): e0151444. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151444. [168] Swan S.H., Sathyanarayana S., Barrett E.S. et al. First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns. Human Re- prod. 2015. 30(4): 963–972. doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu363. [169] Swan S.H., Main K.M., Liu F. et al. Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environ. Health Perspec. 2005. 113(8): 1056-61. doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8100. [170] Swan S.H., Kristensen D.M. Anogenital dis- tance: a marker of steroidal endocrine dis- ruption. Andrology. 2018. 30(1): 963b72. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.64379-9. [171] Hannon P.R., Flaws J.A. The effects of phtha- lates on the ovary. Front. Endocrinol. 2015. 6: 8. doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00008. [172] Panagiotou E.M., Ojasalo V., Damdimopou- lou P. Phthalates, ovarian function and fertil- ity in adulthood. Best Practice Res. Clin. En- docrinol. Metabolism. 2021. 35(5): 101552. doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2021.101552. [173] Basso C.G., de Araújo-Ramos A.T., Marti- no-Andrade A.J. Exposure to phthalates and female reproductive health: A literature re- view. Reprod. Toxicol. 2022. 109: 61–79. doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2022.02.006. [174] Poursafa P., Ataei E., Kelishadi R. A systema tic review on the effects of environmental ex- posure to some organohalogens and phtha- lates on early puberty. J. Res. Med. Scien. 2015. 20(6): 613–618. DOI: 10.4103/1735-1995.165971. [175] Chou Y.Y., Huang P.C., Lee C.C. et al. Phtha- late exposure in girls during early puberty. J. Pediat. Endocrinol. Metabolism. 2009. 22(1): 69–78. doi.org/10.1515/JPEM.2009.22.1.69. [176] Lomenick J.P., Calafat A.M., Castro M.S. et al. Phthalate exposure and precocious puber- ty in females. J. Pediat. 2010. 156(2): 221–5. doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.047. [177] Harris C.A., Henttu P., Parker M.G., Sumpt- er J.P. The estrogenic activity of phthalate es- ters in vitro. Environ. Health Perspec. 1997. 105(8): 802–811. doi.org/10.1289/ehp.97105802. [178] Zhao Y., Li X.N., Zhang H. et al. Phthalate- induced testosterone/androgen receptor pathway disorder on spermatogenesis and antagonism of lycopene. J. Hazar. Mat. 2022. 439: 129689. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129689. [179] Fisher J.S. Environmental anti-androgens and male reproductive health: focus on phtha- lates and testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Re- production. 2004. 127(3): 305–15. doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00025. [180] Beg M.A., Sheikh I.A. Endocrine disruption: structural interactions of androgen receptor against Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and its metabolites. Toxics. 2020. 8(4): 115. doi.org/10.3390/toxics8040115. [181] Desdoits-Lethimonier C., Albert O., Le Bi zec  B. et al. Human testis steroidogenesis is inhibited by phthalates. Human Reprod. 2012. 27(5): 1451–9. doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des069. [182] Xiao-feng Z., Nai-qiang Q., Jing Z. et al. Di (n-butyl) phthalate inhibits testosterone syn- thesis through a glucocorticoid-mediated pathway in rats. Int. J. Toxicol. 2009. 28(5): 448–56. doi.org/10.1177/1091581809342596. [183] Lambrot R., Muczynski V., Lécureuil C. et al. Phthalates impair germ cell development in the human fetal testis in vitro without change in testosterone production. Environ. Health Perspec. 2009. 117(1): 32–37. doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11146 НАЦІОНАЛЬНА АКАДЕМІЯ НАУК УКРАЇНИ ІНСТИТУТ ЗАГАЛЬНОЇ ТА НЕОРГАНІЧНОЇ ХІМІЇ імені В. І. ВЕРНАДСЬКОГО КИЇВСЬКИЙ НАЦІОНАЛЬНИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ імені ТАРАСА ШЕВЧЕНКА
id oai:ojs2.1444248.nisspano.web.hosting-test.net:article-728
institution Ukrainian Chemistry Journal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-07-23T01:13:08Z
publishDate 2025
publisher V.I.Vernadsky Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv ucjorgua/00/8a253694885b7fbe3268763eb349e400.pdf
spelling oai:ojs2.1444248.nisspano.web.hosting-test.net:article-7282026-07-22T08:23:56Z BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG(Review) Han, Jianlin Wzorek, Alicja Klika, Karel Ono, Taizo Soloshonok, Vadim Bioavailable Plastic, Micro-/Nanoplastics, Environmental Contaminants, Environmental Health Crisis Systemic Pollution, Particle Size Distribution, Biological Barrier Penetration, Cognitive Decline, Neurotoxicity, Plastic Additives, Bisphenols, Phthalates, Hormonal Disruption, Endocrine System, Lipophilicity, Lipid-Mediated Transport, Adipose Tissue Accumulation, Salo (Ukrainian Cured Fat), Solvation-Assisted Desorption, Endogenous/Exogenous Fatty Acids. Dedication: To Casey and Calley Means, fearless science and health advocates, for their inspiring work in redefining wellness and empowering individuals to take charge of their metabolic destinies. &amp;nbsp; Micro-/nanoplastics represent a ubiquitous environmental contaminant with potential adverse effects across all living organisms. Ongoing research consistently reveals new and expands upon existing concerns regarding plastic exposure. Notably, emerging evidence suggests a link between plastic exposure and premature cognitive decline in older adults, potentially contributing to the onset or exacerbation of neurodegenerative diseases associated with dementia. Furthermore, endocrine-disrupting chemicals derived from plastics have been implicated in hormonal imbalances, potentially resulting in the masculinization of female development and the feminization of male development. If unmitigated, these impacts could precipitate a substantial and unforeseen environmental health crisis. This Perspective employs a chemistry-based approach to elucidate plastic-related health issues and introduces the concept of bioavailable plastic, i.e. plastic particles smaller than 2.5 μm capable of biological barrier penetration. We highlight lipophilicity as the key physicochemical property responsible for the uptake of these particles within organisms particularly their accumulation in adipose tissues, including the brain. Furthermore, we propose a solvation-assisted desorption mechanism whereby oligomeric molecules released from plastics in fatty tissues generate mono- and dicarboxylic acids that mimic endogenous fatty acids. These exogenous fatty acids can integrate into phospholipid and glycolipid biosynthesis becoming components of cell membranes and myelin sheaths. These considerations should stimulate research aimed at neurological health protection in an increasingly plastic-laden environment, though the broader implications of this integration are of significant concern. Mechanistic understanding of the link between bioavailable plastic exposure and central nervous system disorders is crucial for informing transformative policy changes and preventive measures to safeguard future generations’ health. To empower readers with actionable strategies for reducing plastic exposure, we offer several recommendations. Notably, limiting the consumption of fatty animal products, especially pork fat (salo) is advised. While salo is a culturally significant food, it appears to be a major reservoir for plastic particles, particularly those smaller than 200 nm, i.e. bioavailable plastic. These nanoparticles, due to their ability to traverse biological barriers in humans, pose a considerable risk. This Perspective seeks to underscore the critical need for comprehensive research into the long-term health effects of microplastics highlighting their pervasive presence and potential hidden dangers. V.I.Vernadsky Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry 2025-06-25 Article Article Organic chemistry Органическая xимия Органічна xімія application/pdf https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/728 10.33609/2708-129X.91.5.2025.33-62 Ukrainian Chemistry Journal; Vol. 91 No. 5 (2025): Ukrainian Chemistry Journal; 33-62 Украинский химический журнал; ##issue.vol## 91 ##issue.no## 5 (2025): Ukrainian Chemistry Journal; 33-62 Український хімічний журнал; Том 91 № 5 (2025): Ukrainian Chemistry Journal; 33-62 2708-129X 2708-1281 en https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/728/368 Copyright (c) 2025 Jianlin Han, Alicja Wzorek, Karel Klika, Taizo Ono, Vadim Soloshonok https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Han, Jianlin
Wzorek, Alicja
Klika, Karel
Ono, Taizo
Soloshonok, Vadim
BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG(Review)
title BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG(Review)
title_full BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG(Review)
title_fullStr BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG(Review)
title_full_unstemmed BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG(Review)
title_short BIOAVAILABLE PLASTIC: FROM COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE OLD TO HORMONAL DISRUPTION IN THE YOUNG(Review)
title_sort bioavailable plastic: from cognitive decline in the old to hormonal disruption in the young(review)
topic_facet Bioavailable Plastic
Micro-/Nanoplastics
Environmental Contaminants
Environmental Health Crisis Systemic Pollution
Particle Size Distribution
Biological Barrier Penetration
Cognitive Decline
Neurotoxicity
Plastic Additives
Bisphenols
Phthalates
Hormonal Disruption
Endocrine System
Lipophilicity
Lipid-Mediated Transport
Adipose Tissue Accumulation
Salo (Ukrainian Cured Fat)
Solvation-Assisted Desorption
Endogenous/Exogenous Fatty Acids.
url https://ucj.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/728
work_keys_str_mv AT hanjianlin bioavailableplasticfromcognitivedeclineintheoldtohormonaldisruptionintheyoungreview
AT wzorekalicja bioavailableplasticfromcognitivedeclineintheoldtohormonaldisruptionintheyoungreview
AT klikakarel bioavailableplasticfromcognitivedeclineintheoldtohormonaldisruptionintheyoungreview
AT onotaizo bioavailableplasticfromcognitivedeclineintheoldtohormonaldisruptionintheyoungreview
AT soloshonokvadim bioavailableplasticfromcognitivedeclineintheoldtohormonaldisruptionintheyoungreview