ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ

Background. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with increasing incidence in many developing countries. Understanding region-specific risk factors is essential for effective prevention strategies. This study aimed to identify major determinants of lung cancer in Nort...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в:Експериментальна онкологія
Дата:2026
Том:48
Випуск:2
Сторінки:152-160
ISSN:2312-8852
Автори та афіліації:
  • Putri Aulia Anwar — Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Noni Novisari Soeroso — Thoracic Oncology Division, Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia/Prof. dr. Chairuddin P. Lubis Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital, Medan, Indonesia
  • Setia Putra Tarigan — Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia/Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, Indonesia — ORCID: 0000-0002-6242-7013
  • Putri Chairani Eyanoer — Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Автори: Aulia Anwar, Putri, Novisari Soeroso, Noni, Putra Tarigan, Setia, Chairani Eyanoer, Putri
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: PH Akademperiodyka 2026
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://exp-oncology.com.ua/index.php/Exp/article/view/650
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Experimental Oncology
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Experimental Oncology
_version_ 1874183252444446720
author Aulia Anwar, Putri
Novisari Soeroso, Noni
Putra Tarigan, Setia
Chairani Eyanoer, Putri
author_facet Aulia Anwar, Putri
Novisari Soeroso, Noni
Putra Tarigan, Setia
Chairani Eyanoer, Putri
author_institution_txt_mv [ { "author": "Putri Aulia Anwar", "institution": "Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia", "orcid": "" }, { "author": "Noni Novisari Soeroso", "institution": "Thoracic Oncology Division, Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia\/Prof. dr. Chairuddin P. Lubis Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital, Medan, Indonesia", "orcid": "" }, { "author": "Setia Putra Tarigan", "institution": "Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia\/Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, Indonesia", "orcid": "0000-0002-6242-7013" }, { "author": "Putri Chairani Eyanoer", "institution": "Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia", "orcid": "" } ]
author_orcid_str_mv 0000-0002-6242-7013
author_sort Aulia Anwar, Putri
baseUrl_str https://exp-oncology.com.ua/index.php/Exp/oai
collection OJS
container_end_page 160
container_issue 2
container_start_page 152
container_title Експериментальна онкологія
container_volume 48
datestamp_date 2026-08-21T12:36:15Z
description Background. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with increasing incidence in many developing countries. Understanding region-specific risk factors is essential for effective prevention strategies. This study aimed to identify major determinants of lung cancer in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Materials and Methods. A hospital-based observational study with a case–control analytical approach was conducted between August and November 2024 in three referral hospitals in North Sumatra. A total of 240 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer and 240 controls without malignancy or chronic respiratory disease were included. Participants were comparable by sex and residential area, while age differences between groups were statistically adjusted in the multivariate regression model. Results. Smoking exposure differed significantly between cases and controls (p = 0.023). The multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors of lung cancer. Age <45 years increased the risk more than two-fold (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.10—6.21), whereas age >65 years showed a lower relative risk (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.33—0.88). The occupational exposure signicantly increased lung cancer risk (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.13—3.25). Unhealthy indoor environments, characterized by poor ventilation and household pollutant exposure, were also associated with an increased risk (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.45—4.40). Chronic respiratory diseases, particularly tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were more prevalent among cases and contributed to the elevated risk. Conclusions. Smoking exposure, occupational hazards, unhealthy indoor environments, and chronic pulmonary diseases are important determinants of lung cancer in North Sumatra. Public health strategies focusing on tobacco control, improved workplace safety, and reduction of indoor air pollution may substantially reduce lung cancer burden in this region.
doi_str_mv 10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.02.152
first_indexed 2026-08-22T01:00:32Z
format Article
fulltext 152 ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION C i t a t i o n: Anwar PA, Soeroso NN, Tarigan SP, Eyanoer PC. Smoking, environmental exposures, and chronic lung disease as key risk factors for lung cancer in North Sumatra. Exp Oncol. 2026; 48(2): 152-160. https://doi.org/10.15407/ exp-oncology.2026.02.152 © PH “Akademperiodyka” of the NAS of Ukraine, 2026. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.02.152 Putri Aulia Anwar 1, Noni Novisari Soeroso 2, *, Setia Putra Tarigan 3, Putri Chairani Eyanoer 4 1 Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia 2 Thoracic Oncology Division, Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia/Prof. dr. Chairuddin P. Lubis Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital, Medan, Indonesia 3 Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia/Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, Indonesia 4 Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia * Correspondence: E-mail: noni@usu.ac.id SMOKING, ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES, AND CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE AS KEY RISK FACTORS FOR LUNG CANCER IN NORTH SUMATRA Background. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with increasing incidence in many devel- oping countries. Understanding region-specific risk factors is essential for effective prevention strategies. This study aimed to identify major determinants of lung cancer in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Materials and Methods. A hospital-based observa- tional study with a case–control analytical approach was conducted between August and November 2024 in three referral hos- pitals in North Sumatra. A total of 240 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer and 240 controls without malignancy or chronic respiratory disease were included. Participants were comparable by sex and residential area, while age differences between groups were statistically adjusted in the multivariate regression model. Results. Smoking exposure differed signifi- cantly between cases and controls (p = 0.023). The multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors of lung can- cer. Age <45 years increased the risk more than two-fold (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.10—6.21), whereas age >65 years showed a lower relative risk (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.33—0.88). The occupational exposure signicantly increased lung cancer risk (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.13—3.25). Unhealthy indoor environments, characterized by poor ventilation and household pollutant exposure, were also associated with an increased risk (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.45—4.40). Chronic respiratory diseases, particularly tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were more prevalent among cases and contributed to the elevated risk. Conclusions. Smoking exposure, occupational hazards, unhealthy indoor environments, and chronic pulmonary diseases are important de- terminants of lung cancer in North Sumatra. Public health strategies focusing on tobacco control, improved workplace safety, and reduction of indoor air pollution may substantially reduce lung cancer burden in this region. Keywords: lung cancer, smoking, occupational exposure, indoor air pollution, tuberculosis. https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.02.152 https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.02.152 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.02.152 mailto:tiwuul@gmail.com mailto:tiwuul@gmail.com mailto:noni@usu.ac.id ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 153 Smoking, Environmental Exposures, and Chronic Lung Disease as Key Risk Factors for Lung Cancer Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer- related mortality worldwide, responsible for 2.2 mil lion new cases and 1.8 million deaths in 2020 [1, 2]. It is classified into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with ad- enocarcinoma as the most common subtype [1]. In Indonesia, lung cancer accounts for 8.6% of new cancer cases and 12.6% of cancer deaths, represent- ing a major public health burden [3, 4]. Smoking remains the predominant risk factor, with smokers having up to ten-fold higher risk than non- smokers [5]. In Indonesia, nearly a quarter of the pop- ulation are active smokers, with particularly high prevalence in North Sumatra [6]. Beyond tobacco, oc- cupational and environmental exposures such as as- bestos, radon, cadmium, and air pollutants signifi- cantly contribute to lung carcinogenesis, many of which are recognized as carcinogenic by the Interna- tional Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [7—9]. Early initiation of smoking is strongly associated with increased lifetime nicotine dependence, higher daily cigarette consumption in adulthood, and pro- longed exposure to carcinogenic substances found in tobacco smoke. These factors collectively height- en the risk of developing tobacco-related malignan- cies, including lung cancer, head and neck cancers, tracheobronchial tumors, and other smoking-asso- ciated diseases. Evidence consistently shows that in- dividuals who start smoking at a young age face a substantially higher lifetime risk of cancer compared to those who initiate tobacco use later. Chronic pulmonary diseases, including tubercu- losis (TB) and chronic obstructive pulmonary dis- ease (COPD), also increase lung cancer susceptibi lity through long-term inflammation and fibrosis [10—12]. Given the high mortality and multifacto- rial etiology of lung cancer, region-specific evidence is needed to guide prevention and early detection. This study therefore aimed to investigate the asso- ciations of smoking, environmental and occupation- al exposures, and chronic pulmonary diseases with lung cancer in the North Sumatra population. Materials and Methods Study design and setting. This study employed a hospital-based case–control design conducted be- tween August and November 2024 at three tertiary referral hospitals in North Sumatra, Indonesia: Adam Malik Hospital, Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital, and Santa Elisabeth Hospital. Cases and controls were recruited from the same hospitals to ensure that both groups originated from a compa- rable source population. Participants were compa- rable by sex and residential area, while age was treat- ed as a potential confounding variable and adjusted statistically in the multivariate regression analysis. Participants. The case group consisted of 240 pa- tients with histologically confirmed lung cancer, including both SCLC and NSCLC, diagnosed based on histopathological examination supported by clinical evaluation. The control group included 240 individuals without malignancy or chronic respiratory disease who were recruited from general outpatient clinics in the same hospitals during the study period. Con- trols were selected from patients visiting the clinics for non-respiratory and non-oncological condi- tions, ensuring that they represented the same un- derlying population as the cases. Participants were eligible if they were ≥ 18 years old and willing to participate in the study. Indivi duals with any current malignancy, chronic respira- tory disease, or acute respiratory illness were ex- cluded from the control group. Cases were recruited consecutively from hospi- talized patients diagnosed with lung cancer. The minimum sample size required for adequate statis- tical power was 240 participants per group, calcu- lated based on case–control study assumptions. Data collection. Clinical and demographic in- formation was collected using medical records and structured data collection forms. The vari- ables included: • age; • sex; • occupation; • smoking exposure; • occupational exposure to carcinogens; • residential environmental conditions; • indoor household environment; • history of chronic respiratory diseases (inclu ding TB and COPD); • family history of cancer. For patients in the case group, additional clinical information was collected, including: • histological subtype; • cancer stage; • metastasis status; • EGFR mutation status; 154 ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 P.A. Anwar, N.N. Soeroso, S.P. Tarigan, P.C. Eyanoer • ECOG performance status; • treatment regimen. Definition of key exposure variables. Smoking exposure was categorized into four groups: • never smokers: individuals who had never smoked in their lifetime; • passive smokers: individuals exposed to tobac- co smoke at home or in the workplace; • former smokers: individuals who previously smoked but stopped smoking for at least 12 months before enrolment; • current smokers: individuals actively smoking cigarettes or other tobacco products at the time of the study. Additional smoking variables included age at smoking initiation, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and duration of smoking. Occupational exposure referred to the long-term exposure to known lung carcinogens in the work- place. Common occupations among participants included construction workers, factory workers, drivers exposed to traffic pollution, miners, and ag- ricultural workers. Relevant exposures included as- bestos, silica dust, diesel exhaust, industrial chem- icals, and pesticide aerosols. Residential environment referred to environmental pollution surrounding the household, including prox- imity to industrial areas, major roads with high traffic density, or other sources of outdoor air pollution. Indoor household environment was classified as healthy or unhealthy based on the presence of risk factors such as poor ventilation, indoor tobacco smoke exposure, use of biomass fuel for cooking, and household dampness or mold. Family history of cancer. Family history of cancer was defined as a reported history of cancer among first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, or children). Information regarding cancer history among sec- ond-degree relatives was not systematically avai lable in the medical records and therefore was not included in the present analysis. Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline participant character- istics. The categorical variables were compared us- ing the Chi-square test, while the continuous vari- ables were analyzed using independent samples t‑tests. The variables with p < 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression model using backward stepwise selec- tion to identify independent risk factors for lung cancer. Because the control group was not com- pletely matched by age, age was included as an ad- justment variable in the multivariate model to control for potential confounding. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the strength of the associations between risk factors and lung cancer. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Ethical approval. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara (No. 1134/KEPK/ USU/2024). All procedures were conducted in accor- dance with ethical standards for medical research in- volving human subjects. Eligible participants were re- cruited from three referral hospitals in North Sumatra between August and November 2024. Cases were de- fined as patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer (SCLC or NSCLC) verified by clinical and his- topathological examinations. Controls were individu- als without malignancy or chronic respiratory disease recruited from outpatient clinics in the same hospi- tals. Exclusion criteria for both groups included any Flow diagram of participant selection ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 155 Smoking, Environmental Exposures, and Chronic Lung Disease as Key Risk Factors for Lung Cancer concurrent malignancy or acute or chronic respira- tory illness. A total of 240 cases and 240 controls were included in the final analysis (Figure). Results Baseline characteristics of participants are presen ted in Table 1. Sex distribution was similar between groups, with most participants being male. A sig- nificant difference in age distribution was observed between groups (p < 0.001). The control group con- tained the higher proportion of participants aged <45 years (20.8%) compared to the cases (6.3%), indicating potential age imbalance between groups. The history of cancer, smoking exposure, occupa- tional exposure, unhealthy indoor environment, and previous respiratory disease were significantly more common among cases than controls, whereas the family history of cancer and general residential environment showed no significant differences. Comparison of risk factors between groups is summarized in Table 2. Lung cancer patients were more likely to have a history of cancer (p = 0.012), occupational exposure (p = 0.001), unhealthy in- door environments (p < 0.001), and respiratory dis- ease (p < 0.001). They also had higher overall risk scores (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in mean age, family history of cancer, smoking exposure, or residential environment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified several independent risk factors for lung cancer (Table 3). Smoking exposure was strongly associated with lung cancer risk. Individuals with former or current smoking history had more than a three-fold increased risk compared with never smokers (OR 3.42; 95% CI 1.96—5.97). Passive smoking was also associated with increased risk (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.02—3.04). Occupational exposure remained a significant predictor (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.13—3.25), and participants living in unhealthy indoor environ- ments had a more than two-fold higher risk of lung cancer (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.45—4.40). Age was in- cluded as an adjustment variable in the model to control for potential confounding. Discussion This study identified smoking exposure, occupa- tional hazards, unhealthy indoor environments, and chronic respiratory diseases as important de- Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study participants Characteristics Case group (n = 240) Control group (n = 240) p-value Sex Female 59 (24.6%) 58 (24.2%) Male 181 (75.4%) 182 (75.8%) 0.915 Age <45 years 15 (6.3%) 50 (20.8%) 45—65 years 162 (67.5%) 112 (46.7%) >65 years 63 (26.3%) 78 (32.5%) <0.001 History of cancer None 233 (97.1%) 240 (100%) <5 years ago 5 (2.1%) 0 (0%) >5 years ago 2 (0.8%) 0 (0%) 0.029 Family history None 235 (97.9%) 236 (98.3%) Other cancers 3 (1.3%) 4 (1.7%) Lung cancer 2 (0.8%) 0 (0%) 0.342 Smoking exposure Never 18 (7.5%) 32 (13.3%) Passive 51 (21.3%) 31 (12.9%) Ex-/current smoker 76 (31.7%) 86 (35.8%) Active smoker 95 (39.6%) 91 (37.9%) 0.023 Occupational exposure Yes 116 (48.3%) 80 (33.3%) No 124 (51.7%) 160 (66.7%) 0.001 Residential environment Unhealthy 114 (47.5%) 97 (40.4%) Healthy 126 (52.5%) 143 (59.6%) 0.118 Indoor environment Unhealthy 74 (30.8%) 41 (17.1%) Healthy 166 (69.2%) 199 (82.9%) <0.001 Respiratory disease None 209 (87.1%) 240 (100%) COPD 18 (7.5%) 0 (0%) Tuberculosis 13 (5.4%) 0 (0%) <0.001 Risk level Mild 12 (5.0%) 34 (14.2%) Moderate 92 (38.3%) 103 (42.9%) Severe 136 (56.7%) 103 (42.9%) <0.001 Notes: Chi-square test was used for categorical variables. COPD  — chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Risk level was categorized based on cumulative exposure to smoking, occupational, and environmental pollutants. 156 ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 P.A. Anwar, N.N. Soeroso, S.P. Tarigan, P.C. Eyanoer terminants of lung cancer risk in North Sumatra. These findings are consistent with the global understanding that lung cancer is largely driven by modifiable environmental and behavioral ex- posures. Recent global analyses continue to em- phasize that tobacco use and environmental ex- posures remain the dominant contributors to lung cancer incidence worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where tobacco control and environmental regulations remain limited [13—15]. The absence of significant sex-related differences between cases and controls in this study is consis- tent with previous epidemiological studies. Al- though the majority of lung cancer patients were male, reflecting the higher prevalence of smoking among men in Indonesia, recent international data suggest that the gap between men and women is gradually narrowing due to increasing smoking rates among women and environmental exposure among non-smokers [13, 14]. Recent global cancer statistics have also reported an increasing lung can- cer incidence among women in several regions, partly driven by changing smoking patterns and environmental exposures [16]. Age is widely recognized as a major determinant of lung cancer incidence, with risk generally in- creasing with advancing age due to cumulative ex- posure to carcinogens and progressive genetic damage. In the present study, differences in age dis- tribution were observed between cases and cont rols. Because the control group contained the high- er proportion of younger individuals, age was treat- ed as a potential confounding variable and included in the multivariate regression model. This approach helps ensure that the estimated associations be- tween environmental exposures and lung cancer risk are not biased by differences in age distribution between groups [17]. Smoking exposure remained the most important behavioral risk factor in this study. The multivari- ate analysis demonstrated that former or current smokers had a significantly higher risk of lung can- cer compared with never smokers. Tobacco smoke contains thousands of carcinogenic compounds, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrosamines, and heavy metals, which in- duce DNA damage, promote chronic inflamma- tion, and accelerate carcinogenesis [5, 18]. Large cohort studies have shown that smokers have a 15—30-fold higher risk of lung cancer compared to non-smokers, with risk strongly correlated with smoking duration and intensity [18]. Passive smok- ing was also associated with an increased risk in Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for lung cancer Variable p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) Age (reference: 45—65 years) <45 years 0.081 1.62 (0.94—2.79) >65 years 0.109 1.34 (0.94—1.92) Smoking exposure (reference: never smoker) Passive smoking 0.041 1.76 (1.02—3.04) Former/current smoker <0.001 3.42 (1.96—5.97) Occupational exposure 0.017 1.91 (1.13—3.25) Indoor environment (unhealthy) 0.001 2.53 (1.45—4.40) Notes: Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex. OR — odds ratio; CI — confidence interval. Table 2. Comparison of risk factors between lung cancer cases and controls Variable Case group (mean ± SD) Control group (mean ± SD) p-value Age 2.20 ± 0.54 2.12 ± 0.72 0.152 History of cancer 1.04 ± 0.23 1.00 ± 0.00 0.012 Family history of cancer 1.04 ± 0.29 1.02 ± 0.13 0.315 Smoking exposure 3.03 ± 0.95 2.98 ± 1.02 0.580 Occupational exposure 1.97 ± 1.00 1.67 ± 0.95 0.001 Residential environment 1.95 ± 1.00 1.81 ± 0.98 0.118 Indoor environment 1.62 ± 0.93 1.34 ± 0.75 < 0.001 Respiratory disease 1.18 ± 0.51 1.00 ± 0.00 < 0.001 Risk level 2.52 ± 0.59 2.29 ± 0.70 < 0.001 Notes: Independent samples t-test. Higher mean scores indicate greater exposure or risk severity. Risk level score was derived from combined smoking, occupational, and environmental exposure categories. ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 157 Smoking, Environmental Exposures, and Chronic Lung Disease as Key Risk Factors for Lung Cancer this study, supporting evidence that second-hand smoke exposure contributes to lung cancer deve lopment, particularly among individuals living with smokers [19]. Recent epidemiological studies further indicate that the combined effects of tobac- co smoke and air pollution may amplify lung can- cer risk in urban populations, particularly in rap- idly developing Asian regions [20]. Occupational exposure also showed a significant association with lung cancer risk. Workers exposed to industrial carcinogens such as asbestos, silica dust, diesel exhaust, and heavy metals have consis- tently demonstrated higher lung cancer incidence in occupational epidemiology studies. The IARC classifies several occupational agents, including as- bestos and cadmium, as Group 1 carcinogens for lung cancer [7]. Similar findings have been report- ed in large-cohort studies in Asia and Europe, where long-term occupational exposure signifi- cantly increased lung cancer mortality [21, 22]. Re- cent evidence also highlights the role of occupa- tional particulate exposure and industrial pollut- ants in the increasing lung cancer risk among workers in rapidly industrializing regions [23]. Indoor air pollution was another important de- terminant identified in this study. Participants li ving in unhealthy indoor environments had more than twice the risk of developing lung cancer. In- door air pollution is a major public health concern in many developing countries, where exposure to biomass fuels, poor ventilation, and indoor tobacco smoke is common. Previous studies conducted in India and China have reported similar findings, particularly among non-smoking women exposed to biomass combustion products [24, 25]. Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and volatile or- ganic compounds such as benzene, toluene, ethyl- benzene, and xylene (BTEX) contributes to oxida- tive stress, DNA damage, and chronic inflamma- tion, which are important mechanisms in lung carcinogenesis [26, 27]. Recent environmental health research has further demonstrated that long- term exposure to fine particulate matter signifi- cantly increases lung cancer incidence and mortal- ity in urban populations [28]. Chronic pulmonary diseases, particularly COPD and TB, were more prevalent among lung cancer cases in this study. Chronic inflammation associ- ated with these conditions may contribute to carci- nogenesis through repeated tissue injury, fibrosis, and activation of inflammatory pathways. Epide- miological evidence indicates that a history of TB or COPD is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer in the general population. A recent me- ta-analysis reported that pulmonary TB confers more than a twofold increase in lung cancer risk [29]. Consistently, a population-based cohort study demonstrated a 1.72-fold higher risk of lung cancer among TB survivors, with a greater risk observed in those with coexisting COPD [30]. Moreover, TB has been shown to significantly increase the risk of developing COPD, further contributing to lung carcinogenesis through persistent airway inflam- mation and structural lung damage [31]. In contrast, family history of cancer was not significantly associated with lung cancer risk in this study. This finding differs from several large- scale studies conducted in Korea and Western populations, which have consistently reported that a positive family history of lung cancer is as- sociated with an increased risk of disease, with estimated risk elevations ranging from approxi- mately 1.5 to more than 2-fold compared with in- dividuals without such history [12, 32, 33]. The discrepancy observed in the present study may re- flect population-specific factors or the stronger influence of environmental exposures, particular- ly smoking and air pollution, in the North Suma- tran population. Nevertheless, prospective cohort evidence indicates that the family history of lung cancer remains an independent risk factor for lung cancer development even after adjustment for major confounders, with significantly in- creased risk observed in both smokers and never- smokers [33]. Overall, the findings of this study emphasize that lung cancer in North Sumatra is strongly associated with modifiable environmental and behavioral fac- tors. Smoking, occupational exposures, indoor air pollution, and chronic respiratory diseases appear to play major roles in disease development. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening tobacco control policies, improving occupational safety, and reducing indoor air pollution as key strategies to reduce lung cancer burden in high-risk populations. This study provides important region- al epidemiological evidence on lung cancer risk factors in North Sumatra, contributing to the de- velopment of targeted prevention strategies in high-burden settings. 158 ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 P.A. Anwar, N.N. Soeroso, S.P. Tarigan, P.C. Eyanoer Strengths and limitations of the study This study has several important strengths. First, it included a relatively large sample of lung cancer patients and controls recruited from three major referral hospitals in North Sumatra, providing ro- bust epidemiological data from a high-burden re- gion. Second, the study simultaneously evaluated multiple environmental, behavioral, and clinical risk factors, allowing a more comprehensive assess- ment of determinants associated with lung cancer in this population. Third, the use of multivariate regression analysis enabled adjustment for poten- tial confounding variables, particularly age differ- ences between cases and controls, thereby strength- ening the validity of the observed associations. This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the hospital-based design may introduce selection bias and limit the generalizability of the results to the broader population. In addition, the case and control groups were not strictly age-matched; therefore, age was included as an adjustment vari- able in the multivariate regression analysis to re- duce potential confounding. Information on se veral exposure variables, including smoking his- tory, occupational exposure, and household environmental conditions, was obtained from medical records and self-reported data, which may introduce recall bias. Furthermore, exposure intensity and duration for smoking and occupational carcinogens were not quantified in detail, which may have resulted in residual confounding. Environmental conditions were assessed using questionnaire-based informa- tion rather than objective measurements of indoor air pollutants. In addition, family history of cancer was limited to first-degree relatives because infor- mation on second-degree relatives was not system- atically available in the medical records. Despite these limitations, this study provides important ep- idemiological evidence from a relatively large sam- ple of lung cancer patients and controls in North Sumatra and highlights key modifiable environ- mental and behavioral risk factors in this high-bur- den region. Acknowledgment The authors would like to express their deepest gratitude to the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, for providing the ethical clearance and institutional support necessary for the comple- tion of this research. We are also sincerely thankful to the management and medical staff of Adam Ma- lik Hospital, Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital, and Santa Elisabeth Hospital in North Sumatra for granting access to medical records and for their as- sistance in data collection. Funding There is no funding for this research. Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of in- terest regarding the publication of this study. REFERENCES 1. Soeroso N, Soeroso L, Hasibuan P, et al. Kanker paru: Diagnosis dan penatalaksanaan. Medan: USU Press; 2017. ISBN: 9789794589885 (in Indonesian) 2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and morta lity worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/ caac.21660 3. World Health Organization. Indonesia cancer country profile 2020. Geneva: WHO; 2020. https://cdn.who.int/me- dia/docs/default-source/country-profiles/cancer/idn-2020.pdf 4. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Laporan nasional Riskesdas 2018. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan; 2018. https://repository.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/id/eprint/3514 (in Indonesian) 5. O’Keeffe LM, Taylor G, Huxley RR, et al. Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e021611. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021611 6. Soeroso NN, Zain-Hamid R, Sinaga BYM, et al. The role of CYP2A6 genetic polymorphism in nicotine dependence and tobacco consumption among Bataknese male smokers. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(5):864-866. https:// doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.224 7. Chen G, Wan X, Yang G, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Thorac Cancer. 2015;6(3):307-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12185 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 https://cdn.who.int/ https://repository.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/id/eprint/3514 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021611 https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.224 https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.224 https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12185 ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 159 Smoking, Environmental Exposures, and Chronic Lung Disease as Key Risk Factors for Lung Cancer 8. Guo H, Chang Z, Wu J, et al. Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in China: Who are faced with a greater effect? Environ Int. 2019;132:105077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105077 9. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Agents classified by the IARC monographs. Lyon: IARC; 2020. https://monographs.iarc.who.int/agents-classified-by-the-iarc/ 10. Denholm R, Schüz J, Straif K, et al. Is previous respiratory disease a risk factor for lung cancer? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(5):549-559. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201402-0338OC 11. Moon SM, Choi H, Kim SH, et al. Increased lung cancer risk and associated risk factors in tuberculosis survivors: A Korean population-based study. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(11):1962-1971. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad373 12. Ang L, Chan CPY, Yau WP, et al. Association between family history of lung cancer and lung cancer risk: A sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2020;148:129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.012 13. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17-48. https://doi. org/10.3322/caac.21763 14. Islami F, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global trends of lung cancer mortality and smoking prevalence. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4(4):327-338. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2015.08.04 15. Islami F, Ward EM, Sung H, et al. Global patterns of lung cancer incidence and mortality. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(10):987–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00110-0 16. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2024: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834 17. Subramanian J, Govindan R. Lung cancer in never smokers: A review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):561-570. https://doi. org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8015 18. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, et al. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004;328(7455):1519. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE 19. Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, et al. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61388-8 20. Zhang Y, Chen R, Zhang L, et al. Interaction between smoking and air pollution exposure in lung cancer risk. En- viron Res. 2023;216:114518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114518 21. Wang X, Lin S, Yu IT, et al. Cause-specific mortality in a Chinese chrysotile asbestos mining cohort. Cancer Sci. 2013;104(2):245-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12076 22. Balmes JR. Household air pollution from domestic combustion of solid fuels and health. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(6):1979-1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.04.016 23. Takahashi K, Landrigan PJ, Collegium R. Occupational exposure and lung cancer risk: Global evidence and pre- vention strategies. Occup Environ Med. 2021;78(12):893–899. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107123 24. Hosgood HD, Boffetta P, Greenland S, et al. In-home coal and wood use and lung cancer risk. Environ Health Per- spect. 2010;118(12):1743-1747. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002217 25. Loomis D, Huang W, Chen G. The International Agency for Research on Cancer evaluation of the carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution. Chin J Cancer. 2014;33(4):189-196. https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.014.10110 26. Yu YH, Liao CC, Hsu WH, et al. Increased lung cancer risk among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(1):32-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f68a47 27. Matakidou A, Eisen T, Houlston RS. Systematic review of the relationship between family history and lung cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(7):825-833. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602769 28. Huang J, Pan X, Guo X, Li G. Health impact of China’s Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan. Lancet Planet Health. 2022;6(7):e583-e592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00105-7 29. Sodeifian F, Kian N, Atefi A, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis and risk of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Respiration. 2025;104(5):360–376. https://doi.org/10.1159/000543319 30. Kim T, Choi H, Kim SH, et al. Increased risk of lung cancer and associated risk factors in tuberculosis survivors: A Korean population-based cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(9):e1234–e1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ ciad123 31. Feng J, Hu M, Duan H. Bidirectional association between tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2025;14(21):7639. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217639 32. Kim SH, Lee H, Kim BG, et al. The association between family history of lung cancer and development of lung cancer: Analysis from the KoGES cohort in Korea. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(11):2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/can- cers16112063 33. Lee YG, Seo D, Gil HI, et al. Family history of lung cancer and risk of incident lung cancer: A prospective cohort study. Clin Lung Cancer. 2025;26(5):364–369.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.04.003 Submitted: December 16, 2025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105077 https://monographs.iarc.who.int/agents-classified-by-the-iarc/ https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201402-0338OC https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad373 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.012 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763 https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2015.08.04 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00110-0 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8015 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8015 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61388-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114518 https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12076 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.04.016 https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-107123 https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002217 https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.014.10110 https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f68a47 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602769 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00105-7 https://doi.org/10.1159/000543319 https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad123 https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad123 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217639 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112063 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112063 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.04.003 160 ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 48 (2). 2026 P.A. Anwar, N.N. Soeroso, S.P. Tarigan, P.C. Eyanoer Путрі Аулія Анвар 1, Ноні Новісарі Соерозо 2, Сетія Путра Таріган 3, Путрі Чаїрані Ейаноер 4 1 Кафедра пульмонології та респіраторних хвороб, медичний факультет, Університет Північної Суматри, Медан, Індонезія 2 Відділення торакальної онкології медичного факультету Університету Північної Суматри, Медан, Індонезія / госпіталь університету Північної Суматри ім. проф. Чаїруддін П. Любіс, Медан, Індонезія 3 Кафедра пульмонології та респіраторних хвороб медичного факультету Університету Північної Суматри, Медан, Індонезія / Госпіталь Адама Маліка, Медан, Індонезія 4 Кафедра профілактичної та громадської медицини, медичний факультет, Університет Північної Суматри, Медан, Індонезія ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ Стан питання. Рак легені залишається провідною причиною онкологічної смертності у світі. Захворюваність на рак легені в країнах, що розвиваються, зростає. Визначення специфічних регіональних факторів ризику є важливим для ефективних стратегій профілактики. Мета дослідження полягала у визначенні основних детер- мінант раку легені у Північній Суматрі, Індонезія. Матеріали та методи. Проведено спостережне дослідження на базі трьох клінік у Північній Суматрі, Індонезія, від серпня по листопад 2024 року з включенням 240 хворих із гістологічно підтвердженим раком легені та 240 осіб контрольної групи без злоякісних новоутворень або хронічних захворювань дихальних шляхів. Особи, включені до дослідження, мали порівняні характеристики за статтю та місцем проживання, тоді як вікові відмінності між групами були статистично скориговані за допомо- гою багатофакторної регресійної моделі. Результати. Паління було найбільш визначальним фактором ризику порівняно з контрольною групою. Багатофакторний аналіз виявив кілька незалежних предикторів раку легені. Вік до 45 років збільшував ризик більш ніж удвічі (ВШ 2,62; 95% ДІ 1,10—6,21), тоді як у віці понад 65 років відносний ризик був нижчим (ВШ 0,54; 95% ДІ 0,33—0,88). Несприятливі виробничі фактори значно збільшу- вали ризик раку легень (ВШ 1,91; 95% ДІ 1,13—3,25). Підвищений ризик зазначено також щодо несприятливих побутових умов помешкання, зокрема поганої вентиляції та впливу забруднюючих речовин (ВШ 2,53; 95% ДІ 1,45—4,40). Хронічні респіраторні захворювання, зокрема туберкульоз та хронічна обструктивна хвороба ле- гень, були більш поширеними в групі хворих на рак легень в порівнянні з контрольною групою і сприяли підви- щенню ризику. Висновки. Паління, професійні ризики, нездорове середовище в приміщенні та хронічні захво- рювання легень є важливими детермінантами раку легені у Північній Суматрі. Стратегії громадського здоров’я, зосереджені на обмеженні тютюнопаління, покращенні безпеки на робочому місці та зменшенні забруднення повітря в помешканнях, можуть суттєво зменшити поширення раку легені у цьому регіоні. Ключові слова: рак легені, тютюнопаління, професійні шкідливі фактори, забруднення повітря в помешкан- нях, туберкульоз.
id oai:ojs2.ex.aqua-time.com.ua:article-650
institution Experimental Oncology
issn 2312-8852
keywords_txt_mv
language English
last_indexed 2026-08-22T01:00:32Z
publishDate 2026
publisher PH Akademperiodyka
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv exp-oncologycomua/b5/26b20e09be865af52d30d537f8b514b5.pdf
spelling oai:ojs2.ex.aqua-time.com.ua:article-6502026-08-21T12:36:15Z SMOKING, ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES, AND CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE AS KEY RISK FACTORS FOR LUNG CANCER IN NORTH SUMATRA ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ Aulia Anwar, Putri Novisari Soeroso, Noni Putra Tarigan, Setia Chairani Eyanoer, Putri рак легені, тютюнопаління, професійні шкідливі фактори, забруднення повітря в помешканнях, туберкульоз lung cancer, smoking, occupational exposure, indoor air pollution, tuberculosis Background. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with increasing incidence in many developing countries. Understanding region-specific risk factors is essential for effective prevention strategies. This study aimed to identify major determinants of lung cancer in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Materials and Methods. A hospital-based observational study with a case–control analytical approach was conducted between August and November 2024 in three referral hospitals in North Sumatra. A total of 240 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer and 240 controls without malignancy or chronic respiratory disease were included. Participants were comparable by sex and residential area, while age differences between groups were statistically adjusted in the multivariate regression model. Results. Smoking exposure differed significantly between cases and controls (p = 0.023). The multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors of lung cancer. Age &amp;lt;45 years increased the risk more than two-fold (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.10—6.21), whereas age &amp;gt;65 years showed a lower relative risk (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.33—0.88). The occupational exposure signicantly increased lung cancer risk (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.13—3.25). Unhealthy indoor environments, characterized by poor ventilation and household pollutant exposure, were also associated with an increased risk (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.45—4.40). Chronic respiratory diseases, particularly tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were more prevalent among cases and contributed to the elevated risk. Conclusions. Smoking exposure, occupational hazards, unhealthy indoor environments, and chronic pulmonary diseases are important determinants of lung cancer in North Sumatra. Public health strategies focusing on tobacco control, improved workplace safety, and reduction of indoor air pollution may substantially reduce lung cancer burden in this region. Стан питання. Рак легені залишається провідною причиною онкологічної смертності у світі. Захворюваність на рак легені в країнах, що розвиваються, зростає. Визначення специфічних регіональних факторів ризику є важливим для ефективних стратегій профілактики. Мета дослідження полягала у визначенні основних детермінант раку легені у Північній Суматрі, Індонезія. Матеріали та методи. Проведено спостережне дослідження на базі трьох клінік у Північній Суматрі, Індонезія, від серпня по листопад 2024 року з включенням 240 хворих із гістологічно підтвердженим раком легені та 240 осіб контрольної групи без злоякісних новоутворень або хронічних захворювань дихальних шляхів. Особи, включені до дослідження, мали порівняні характеристики за статтю та місцем проживання, тоді як вікові відмінності між групами були статистично скориговані за допомогою багатофакторної регресійної моделі. Результати. Паління було найбільш визначальним фактором ризику порівняно з контрольною групою. Багатофакторний аналіз виявив кілька незалежних предикторів раку легені. Вік до 45 років збільшував ризик більш ніж удвічі (ВШ 2,62; 95% ДІ 1,10—6,21), тоді як у віці понад 65 років відносний ризик був нижчим (ВШ 0,54; 95% ДІ 0,33—0,88). Несприятливі виробничі фактори значно збільшували ризик раку легень (ВШ 1,91; 95% ДІ 1,13—3,25). Підвищений ризик зазначено також щодо несприятливих побутових умов помешкання, зокрема поганої вентиляції та впливу забруднюючих речовин (ВШ 2,53; 95% ДІ 1,45—4,40). Хронічні респіраторні захворювання, зокрема туберкульоз та хронічна обструктивна хвороба легень, були більш поширеними в групі хворих на рак легень в порівнянні з контрольною групою і сприяли підвищенню ризику. Висновки. Паління, професійні ризики, нездорове середовище в приміщенні та хронічні захворювання легень є важливими детермінантами раку легені у Північній Суматрі. Стратегії громадського здоров’я, зосереджені на обмеженні тютюнопаління, покращенні безпеки на робочому місці та зменшенні забруднення повітря в помешканнях, можуть суттєво зменшити поширення раку легені у цьому регіоні. PH Akademperiodyka 2026-08-21 Article Article application/pdf https://exp-oncology.com.ua/index.php/Exp/article/view/650 10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.02.152 Experimental Oncology; Vol. 48 No. 2 (2026): Experimental Oncology; 152-160 Експериментальна онкологія; Том 48 № 2 (2026): Експериментальна онкологія; 152-160 2312-8852 1812-9269 10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.02 en https://exp-oncology.com.ua/index.php/Exp/article/view/650/476 Copyright (c) 2026 Experimental Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle рак легені
тютюнопаління
професійні шкідливі фактори
забруднення повітря в помешканнях
туберкульоз
Aulia Anwar, Putri
Novisari Soeroso, Noni
Putra Tarigan, Setia
Chairani Eyanoer, Putri
ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ
title ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ
title_alt SMOKING, ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES, AND CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE AS KEY RISK FACTORS FOR LUNG CANCER IN NORTH SUMATRA
title_full ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ
title_fullStr ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ
title_full_unstemmed ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ
title_short ПАЛІННЯ, ФАКТОРИ ДОВКІЛЛЯ ТА ХРОНІЧНІ ЛЕГЕНЕВІ ХВОРОБИ ЯК КЛЮЧОВІ ФАКТОРИ РИЗИКУ РАКУ ЛЕГЕНІ У ПІВНІЧНІЙ СУМАТРІ
title_sort паління, фактори довкілля та хронічні легеневі хвороби як ключові фактори ризику раку легені у північній суматрі
topic рак легені
тютюнопаління
професійні шкідливі фактори
забруднення повітря в помешканнях
туберкульоз
topic_facet рак легені
тютюнопаління
професійні шкідливі фактори
забруднення повітря в помешканнях
туберкульоз
lung cancer
smoking
occupational exposure
indoor air pollution
tuberculosis
url https://exp-oncology.com.ua/index.php/Exp/article/view/650
work_keys_str_mv AT auliaanwarputri smokingenvironmentalexposuresandchroniclungdiseaseaskeyriskfactorsforlungcancerinnorthsumatra
AT novisarisoerosononi smokingenvironmentalexposuresandchroniclungdiseaseaskeyriskfactorsforlungcancerinnorthsumatra
AT putratarigansetia smokingenvironmentalexposuresandchroniclungdiseaseaskeyriskfactorsforlungcancerinnorthsumatra
AT chairanieyanoerputri smokingenvironmentalexposuresandchroniclungdiseaseaskeyriskfactorsforlungcancerinnorthsumatra
AT auliaanwarputri palínnâfaktoridovkíllâtahroníčnílegenevíhvorobiâkklûčovífaktoririzikurakulegeníupívníčníjsumatrí
AT novisarisoerosononi palínnâfaktoridovkíllâtahroníčnílegenevíhvorobiâkklûčovífaktoririzikurakulegeníupívníčníjsumatrí
AT putratarigansetia palínnâfaktoridovkíllâtahroníčnílegenevíhvorobiâkklûčovífaktoririzikurakulegeníupívníčníjsumatrí
AT chairanieyanoerputri palínnâfaktoridovkíllâtahroníčnílegenevíhvorobiâkklûčovífaktoririzikurakulegeníupívníčníjsumatrí