Особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в Українських Карпатах

Introduction Improving the reproduction of Ukraine’s forest resources is nowadays an urgent issue. Experience shows that when choosing one or another reforestation method (natural or artificial), priority should be given to silvicultural and typological factors, not just economic ones. Materials and...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2022
Автори: Brodovych, Yu. R., Brodovych, R. I., Katsulyak, Yu. D., Sishchuk, M. M.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Українська
Опубліковано: Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration named after G. M. Vysotsky (URIFFM) 2022
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:https://forestry-forestmelioration.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/339
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Forestry and Forest Melioration

Репозитарії

Forestry and Forest Melioration
_version_ 1856543457991983104
author Brodovych, Yu. R.
Brodovych, R. I.
Katsulyak, Yu. D.
Sishchuk, M. M.
author_facet Brodovych, Yu. R.
Brodovych, R. I.
Katsulyak, Yu. D.
Sishchuk, M. M.
author_sort Brodovych, Yu. R.
baseUrl_str
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2023-03-23T22:18:04Z
description Introduction Improving the reproduction of Ukraine’s forest resources is nowadays an urgent issue. Experience shows that when choosing one or another reforestation method (natural or artificial), priority should be given to silvicultural and typological factors, not just economic ones. Materials and Methods The study was based on the departmental data (projects of natural reforestation for 2022) of 12 state forest enterprises, 107 forestries, and 816 clear-cut plots designed for natural reforestation in the State Forest Fund of Transcarpathian and Chernivtsi regions. We also used the materials of research carried out in previous years by Ukrainian Research Institute of Mountain Forestry. Results The research established that as a result of various types of felling, in the mountainous conditions of the Ukrainian Carpathians, about 8.5 thousand hectares of clear-cuts appear annually. Reforestation of cut areas is carried out by various methods, e.g. by leaving cut areas for natural reforestation, by planting forest stands (partial or continuous), or by combining these methods. The ratio of these methods has changed significantly in recent years. If until the 2000s, the vast majority of cut areas (70–80%) were reforested by planting trees, nowadays most of them are left for natural reforestation. Conclusions Main shortcomings in the design of the natural reforestation method in Ukrainian Transcarpathia occur in the beech and spruce formations of forests after the felling of secondary stands. In particular, there is insufficient white fir amount in the composition of natural regeneration in the case of spruce-fir beech forests and beech forests as well as insufficient English or sessile oak regeneration in oak-hornbeam-beech forests. In the spruce formation, especially after the felling of secondary conifer stands affected by diseases, pests, and windstorms, European spruce is mostly dominant in natural regeneration in cut areas. This, in turn, is a threat of re-emergence of outbreaks and diseases. The natural method of clear-cut reforestation has dominated in the State Forest Fund of Chernivtsi Regional Department of Forest and Hunting Management for a long time due to the wide usage of gradual and reforestation felling. However, a number of deviations from silvicultural and typological requirements were also found here. In particular, it concerns fresh and wet hornbeam oak forests, as well as oak and spruce forests, where a small number (600–800 stems·ha-1) of the second type-forming species, namely common oak, is recorded on cut areas. In the spruce formation of the Bukovyna forests, the study revealed a similar situation to the one in Ukrainian Transcarpathia. The article contains specific proposals regarding the necessity to improve the species composition of self-growth and undergrowth in the analysed forest types and to partially clarify the current regulatory requirements regarding the assessment of natural regeneration on cut areas that are designed for natural reforestation in the Ukrainian Carpathians. 3 Tables, 15 Refs.
first_indexed 2026-02-08T08:03:32Z
format Article
id oai:ojs2.forestry-forestmelioration.org.ua:article-339
institution Forestry and Forest Melioration
language Ukrainian
last_indexed 2026-02-08T08:03:32Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration named after G. M. Vysotsky (URIFFM)
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs2.forestry-forestmelioration.org.ua:article-3392023-03-23T22:18:04Z Features of natural reforestation of clear-cuts in the Ukrainian Carpathians Особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в Українських Карпатах Brodovych, Yu. R. Brodovych, R. I. Katsulyak, Yu. D. Sishchuk, M. M. fresh clear-cuts natural regeneration type-forming species quantitative composition species composition renewal свіжі зруби природне відновлення типоутворювальні породи кількісний склад видовий склад поновлення Introduction Improving the reproduction of Ukraine’s forest resources is nowadays an urgent issue. Experience shows that when choosing one or another reforestation method (natural or artificial), priority should be given to silvicultural and typological factors, not just economic ones. Materials and Methods The study was based on the departmental data (projects of natural reforestation for 2022) of 12 state forest enterprises, 107 forestries, and 816 clear-cut plots designed for natural reforestation in the State Forest Fund of Transcarpathian and Chernivtsi regions. We also used the materials of research carried out in previous years by Ukrainian Research Institute of Mountain Forestry. Results The research established that as a result of various types of felling, in the mountainous conditions of the Ukrainian Carpathians, about 8.5 thousand hectares of clear-cuts appear annually. Reforestation of cut areas is carried out by various methods, e.g. by leaving cut areas for natural reforestation, by planting forest stands (partial or continuous), or by combining these methods. The ratio of these methods has changed significantly in recent years. If until the 2000s, the vast majority of cut areas (70–80%) were reforested by planting trees, nowadays most of them are left for natural reforestation. Conclusions Main shortcomings in the design of the natural reforestation method in Ukrainian Transcarpathia occur in the beech and spruce formations of forests after the felling of secondary stands. In particular, there is insufficient white fir amount in the composition of natural regeneration in the case of spruce-fir beech forests and beech forests as well as insufficient English or sessile oak regeneration in oak-hornbeam-beech forests. In the spruce formation, especially after the felling of secondary conifer stands affected by diseases, pests, and windstorms, European spruce is mostly dominant in natural regeneration in cut areas. This, in turn, is a threat of re-emergence of outbreaks and diseases. The natural method of clear-cut reforestation has dominated in the State Forest Fund of Chernivtsi Regional Department of Forest and Hunting Management for a long time due to the wide usage of gradual and reforestation felling. However, a number of deviations from silvicultural and typological requirements were also found here. In particular, it concerns fresh and wet hornbeam oak forests, as well as oak and spruce forests, where a small number (600–800 stems·ha-1) of the second type-forming species, namely common oak, is recorded on cut areas. In the spruce formation of the Bukovyna forests, the study revealed a similar situation to the one in Ukrainian Transcarpathia. The article contains specific proposals regarding the necessity to improve the species composition of self-growth and undergrowth in the analysed forest types and to partially clarify the current regulatory requirements regarding the assessment of natural regeneration on cut areas that are designed for natural reforestation in the Ukrainian Carpathians. 3 Tables, 15 Refs. Проаналізовано особливості природного залісення свіжих зрубів у Карпатах на прикладі лісового фонду Закарпатського й Чернівецького обласних управлінь лісового та мисливського господарства. Оцінено кількісний і породний склад самосіву й підросту деревних порід на зрубах у контексті лісових формацій і переважних типів лісу. Виявлено недоліки під час проєктування способу лісовідновлення та обґрунтовано пропозиції з підвищення його ефективності. Підкреслено необхідність уточнення окремих положень чинних нормативних вимог щодо оцінювання природного поновлення на зрубах, які проєктують під природне залісення. Зокрема це стосується вимоги щодо необхідності участі в складі самосіву та підросту всіх типоутворювальних деревних видів, а не лише головної породи, та заборони залишення під природне залісення зрубів, які утворилися після розробки похідних хвойних деревостанів, уражених збудниками хвороб, пошкоджених комахами та вітром. Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration named after G. M. Vysotsky (URIFFM) 2022-12-29 Article Article application/pdf https://forestry-forestmelioration.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/339 10.33220/1026-3365.141.2022.3 Forestry and Forest Melioration; No. 141 (2022): Forestry and Forest Melioration; 3-12 Лісівництво і Агролісомеліорація; № 141 (2022): Лісівництво і Aгролісомеліорація; 3-12 2663-4147 1026-3365 10.33220/1026-3365.141.2022 uk https://forestry-forestmelioration.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/339/315 Copyright (c) 2022 Forestry and Forest Melioration https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle свіжі зруби
природне відновлення
типоутворювальні породи
кількісний склад
видовий склад
поновлення
Brodovych, Yu. R.
Brodovych, R. I.
Katsulyak, Yu. D.
Sishchuk, M. M.
Особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в Українських Карпатах
title Особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в Українських Карпатах
title_alt Features of natural reforestation of clear-cuts in the Ukrainian Carpathians
title_full Особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в Українських Карпатах
title_fullStr Особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в Українських Карпатах
title_full_unstemmed Особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в Українських Карпатах
title_short Особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в Українських Карпатах
title_sort особливості природного залісення суцільних зрубів в українських карпатах
topic свіжі зруби
природне відновлення
типоутворювальні породи
кількісний склад
видовий склад
поновлення
topic_facet fresh clear-cuts
natural regeneration
type-forming species
quantitative composition
species composition
renewal
свіжі зруби
природне відновлення
типоутворювальні породи
кількісний склад
видовий склад
поновлення
url https://forestry-forestmelioration.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/339
work_keys_str_mv AT brodovychyur featuresofnaturalreforestationofclearcutsintheukrainiancarpathians
AT brodovychri featuresofnaturalreforestationofclearcutsintheukrainiancarpathians
AT katsulyakyud featuresofnaturalreforestationofclearcutsintheukrainiancarpathians
AT sishchukmm featuresofnaturalreforestationofclearcutsintheukrainiancarpathians
AT brodovychyur osoblivostíprirodnogozalísennâsucílʹnihzrubívvukraínsʹkihkarpatah
AT brodovychri osoblivostíprirodnogozalísennâsucílʹnihzrubívvukraínsʹkihkarpatah
AT katsulyakyud osoblivostíprirodnogozalísennâsucílʹnihzrubívvukraínsʹkihkarpatah
AT sishchukmm osoblivostíprirodnogozalísennâsucílʹnihzrubívvukraínsʹkihkarpatah