Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю
The objective of this study was to evaluate agrochemical, allelopathic and microbiological characteristics of the soil under Actinidia arguta plants cultivated in Ukraine and two provinces of China. Material and methods. The rhizosphere soil was sampled at 0–15 cm layer under A. arguta...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Автори: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Англійська |
| Опубліковано: |
M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine
2020
|
| Онлайн доступ: | https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/1541 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Plant Introduction |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Репозитарії
Plant Introduction| _version_ | 1860145074422153216 |
|---|---|
| author | Zaimenko, N.V. Pavlіuchenko, N.A. Ellanska, N.E. Ivanytska, B.O. Kharytonova, I.P. Yunosheva, O.P. Skrypchenko, N.V. Zhang, P. Liu, D. Shen, J. Tian, L. |
| author_facet | Zaimenko, N.V. Pavlіuchenko, N.A. Ellanska, N.E. Ivanytska, B.O. Kharytonova, I.P. Yunosheva, O.P. Skrypchenko, N.V. Zhang, P. Liu, D. Shen, J. Tian, L. |
| author_sort | Zaimenko, N.V. |
| baseUrl_str | https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2023-08-26T20:39:45Z |
| description | The objective of this study was to evaluate agrochemical, allelopathic and microbiological characteristics of the soil under Actinidia arguta plants cultivated in Ukraine and two provinces of China.
Material and methods. The rhizosphere soil was sampled at 0–15 cm layer under A. arguta plants in the stage of fruit ripening in Ukraine (Kyiv city: North of Ukraine, Forest-Steppe zone, a temperate continental climate) and two provinces of China (Shandong: East China, a temperate monsoon zone; and Heilongjiang: Northeast China, continental monsoon climate). The concentrations of carbon, available forms of macro- and micronutrients, phenolic compounds in the soil samples were determined. pH and redox potential of soil were measured. Soil phytotoxicity was studied by direct bioassay method on cress (Lepidium sativum) root growth. Microbiological analyses of soil samples were conducted.
Results. The dissimilarities in the concentrations of carbon, macro- and micronutrients in the examined soil samples were shown. The reduction conditions (Eh < 400 mV) in the soils under A. аrguta might slow down the humification processes. A similar effect may be caused by mobile forms of organic compounds with allelopathic properties. The redox potential decreased with the increase of pH values. This fact reflects the intensifying of reduction processes. The soil phytotoxicity under A. аrguta reached 20–70 % compared with the control, probably due to the accumulation of phenolic compounds, as well as iron and manganese. In soils under A. аrguta, the relationship between pH, phytotoxicity, and the abundance of main taxonomical and ecotrophic groups of microorganisms was evaluated.
Conclusions. Calcic Luvisols from the M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv city, Ukraine) and Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi (Heilongjiang province, China) were determined to be the most favorable for A. arguta cultivation. Salic Solonetz from Harbin (Heilongjiang province, China) and Haplic Luvisols from Linyi (Shandong province, China) had the least suitable soil conditions for A. arguta. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.46341/PI2020002 |
| first_indexed | 2025-07-17T12:53:34Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
© The Authors. This content is provided under CC BY 4.0 license.
Plant Introduction, 85/86, 3–14 (2020)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Comparative analysis of agrochemical, allelopathic and microbiological
characteristics of the soil environment for Actinidia arguta (Siebold et
Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. cultivated in Ukraine and two provinces of China
Introduction
The natural area of Actinidia arguta
(Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. (hardy
kiwifruit) includes China, Korea, and Japan
(Park, 2017). In recent times, the cultivation
of hardy kiwifruit has spread far away
from these countries. This species have
commercial importance due to its high
adaptability, productivity, and various uses
N.V. Zaimenko 1*, N.A. Pavlіuchenko 1, N.E. Ellanska 1, B.O. Ivanytska 1, I.P. Kharytonova 1,
O.P. Yunosheva 1, N.V. Skrypchenko 1, P. Zhang 2, D. Liu 2, J. Shen 2, L. Tian 2
1 M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Timiryazevska str. 1, 01014 Kyiv, Ukraine; *
zaimenkonv@ukr.net
2 Life Science College, Jiamusi University (China-Ukrainian International Joint Laboratory for Agriculture & Forestry Technology
Development and Application), 154007 Jiamusi, China
Received: 14.01.2020 | Accepted: 29.05.2020 | Published: 30.06.2020
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate agrochemical, allelopathic and microbiological characteristics
of the soil under Actinidia arguta plants cultivated in Ukraine and two provinces of China.
Material and methods. The rhizosphere soil was sampled at 0–15 cm layer under A. arguta plants in the
stage of fruit ripening in Ukraine (Kyiv city: North of Ukraine, Forest-Steppe zone, a temperate continental
climate) and two provinces of China (Shandong: East China, a temperate monsoon zone; and Heilongjiang:
Northeast China, continental monsoon climate). The concentrations of carbon, available forms of macro-
and micronutrients, phenolic compounds in the soil samples were determined. pH and redox potential of
soil were measured. Soil phytotoxicity was studied by direct bioassay method on cress (Lepidium sativum)
root growth. Microbiological analyses of soil samples were conducted.
Results. The dissimilarities in the concentrations of carbon, macro- and micronutrients in the examined soil
samples were shown. The reduction conditions (Eh < 400 mV) in the soils under A. аrguta might slow down
the humification processes. A similar effect may be caused by mobile forms of organic compounds with
allelopathic properties. The redox potential decreased with the increase of pH values. This fact reflects the
intensifying of reduction processes. The soil phytotoxicity under A. аrguta reached 20–70 % compared with
the control, probably due to the accumulation of phenolic compounds, as well as iron and manganese. In
soils under A. аrguta, the relationship between pH, phytotoxicity, and the abundance of main taxonomical
and ecotrophic groups of microorganisms was evaluated.
Conclusions. Calcic Luvisols from the M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv
city, Ukraine) and Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi (Heilongjiang province, China) were determined to be
the most favorable for A. arguta cultivation. Salic Solonetz from Harbin (Heilongjiang province, China) and
Haplic Luvisols from Linyi (Shandong province, China) had the least suitable soil conditions for A. arguta.
Keywords: agrochemicals, phenolic allelochemicals, рhytotoxicity, microorganisms, micromycetes, bacteria
https://doi.org/10.46341/PI2020002
UDC 581.524.1
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2379-1223
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-7163
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3634-5313
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8969-2239
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9540-5278
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-7733
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1233-9920
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4435
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-2133
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-5727
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-2602
4 Plant Introduction • 85/86
N.V. Zaimenko, N.A. Pavlіuchenko, N.E. Ellanska, B.O. Ivanytska, I.P. Kharytonova et al.
(Drzewiecki et al., 2016; Stefaniak et al., 2017a;
Latocha, 2017; Almeida et al., 2018).
In particular, in Ukraine, introductory studies
with A. arguta were initiated by M. Kaschenko,
a member of the Academy of Sciences of
Ukrainian SSR, in the Acclimatization Garden
(Kyiv) in the 1920s (Skrypchenko & Latocha,
2017). A. arguta has been successfully cultivated
since the 1950s in the M.M. Gryshko National
Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine, where
its anatomical, morphological and biochemical
features, regenerative ability under conditions
of introduction are investigated, and also
selection work is carried out (Skrypchenko,
2002; Skrypchenko & Latocha, 2017).
Actinidia arguta is mainly cultivated as a
fruit and honey plant because it has beneficial
nutritional qualities due to the high content
of vitamins and mineral elements, as well
as dietary properties (Park, 2017; Latocha,
2017; Pinto & Vilela, 2018; Almeida et al.,
2018). Wide range of bioactive compounds
with antiproliferative (Zuo et al., 2012;
Latocha, 2017), antioxidant (Zuo et al., 2012;
Mikami-Konishide et al., 2013; Latocha,
2017; Almeida et al., 2018), antimicrobial
(Almeida et al., 2018), hepatoprotective (Jho
et al., 2011), antiallergic (Latocha, 2017), anti-
inflammatory and antinociceptive (Teng et al.,
2013), antiamnesic (На et al., 2015) and some
other effects (Nishimura et al., 2016; Latocha,
2017) makes hardy kiwifruit the high-value
medicinal plant.
Investigations of the soil environment of
kiwifruit are fragmentary in contrast to its
well-studied biological properties (Richards
et al., 2007; Li et al., 2017а; Stefaniak et al.,
2017b). This fact motivated us to pay attention
to the study of the soil properties under
A. arguta in the centers of its introduction
(Ukraine) and natural habitat (China). We
hypothesized that the relations between
agrochemicals, allelochemicals, and soil
microbiota determine the success of the
introduction and cultivation of A. arguta
plants. An analytical assessment of the
characteristics of the soil under A. arguta
plants in Ukraine and the provinces of China
will help to determine the optimal conditions
for its cultivation. This approach will provide
opportunities for the interchange of A. arguta
cultivars of local selection in the future.
The objective of this study was to evaluate
agrochemical, allelopathic and microbiological
characteristics of the soils under A. arguta
plants in Ukraine and two provinces of China.
Material and methods
The rhizosphere soil was sampled at 0–15 cm
layer under A. arguta plants in the stage of fruit
ripening. This stage completes the generative
period of development. It is the most important
in the ontogenesis of fruit plants, in particular,
of A. arguta.
The analysis was conducted on: 1 – Haplic
Luvisols, Linyi (Shandong province: East China,
monsoon temperate zone); 2 – Salic Solonetz,
formed by the hydrolysis of carbonates
(Na2CO3, NaHCO3), Harbin (Heilongjiang
province: Northeast China, continental
monsoon climate), 3 – Luvic Chernozems,
Jiamusi (Heilongjiang province: Northeast
China, continental monsoon climate),
4 – Calcic Luvisols, M.M. Gryshko National
Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine (NBG,
Kyiv: North of Ukraine, Forest-Steppe zone,
temperate continental climate). The soils
were classified according to the IUSS Working
Group WRB (2015).
Air-dry soil samples were sieved using
a 1 mm diameter sieve. Available forms of
macro- (N, P, K) and micronutrients (Fe, Mn)
were extracted with 1M HCl from air-dry soil
(Rinkis & Nollendorf, 1982). The concentrations
of carbon and nitrogen in the soil samples
were determined as described by Rinkis &
Nollendorf (1982). Qualitative and quantitative
analysis of P, K, Fe, and Mn was performed
using Thermo Scientific iCAP 6300 ICP
(Inductively Coupled Plasma) Spectrometer.
Soil pH was measured with HI 2211 (Hanna
instruments, pH/ORP Meter) according to the
State Standard of Ukraine (2003), ISO 1039-
2001. The pH was determined using a 1M KCl
solution.
Phenolic compounds were extracted from
the soil by desorption method using an ion
exchanger KU-2-8 (H+) (Grodzinskij et al.,
1988). The contact of the soil with the resin
(KU-2-8 (H+)) was held in a flat-bottomed flask
with a ground stopper in a neutral medium
(ethyl alcohol) at a ratio of soil : resin : alcohol
– 1 : 1 : 2. The contents of the flask were well
stirred and allowed to contact for 48 hours.
After that, the eluates were separated by
centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 20 minutes.
Plant Introduction • 85/86 5
Analysis of the soil environment for Actinidia arguta cultivated in Ukraine and China
After removal of the supernatant liquid, the
contents of the centrifuge tubes were washed
with ethyl alcohol. Then elution continued for
18 hours. Subsequently, the extraction was
carried out in the same sequence twice with
aqueous acetone (2 : 1 by volume). The eluates
were concentrated on a water bath. The dry
residues of alcohol and water-acetone eluates
were dissolved in 5 ml of 96 % and 10 ml of 48 %
ethanol, respectively. The content of phenolic
compounds in the obtained alcohol solutions
of two eluates (alcohol and water-acetone) was
measured spectrophotometrically at 730 nm
wavelength using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent.
The total amount of phenolic compounds was
expressed as gallic acid equivalent.
Soil phytotoxicity was studied by direct
bioassay method on cress (Lepidium
sativum L.) root growth (Grodzinskij et al.,
1990). The redox potential (Eh) was measured
in soil suspension, as a model of soil solution,
at the soil to distilled water ratio as 1 : 1 by
potentiometric technique (Fiedler et al., 2007;
Labuda & Vetchinnikov, 2011).
For the microbiological analyses, such
as the determination of the abundance of
micromycetes (Czapek medium), ammonifiers
(meat-peptone agar), microbiota, utilizing
inorganic nitrogen, and actinomycetes
(ammonium starch agar) the conventional
methods were applied (Tepper et al., 2004).
To determine the ratio between the separate
ecotrophic groups, we calculated the
mineralization-immobilization coefficient,
following the methods of Andreiuk et al.
(2001), and the calculation of SOM (soil organic
matter) transformation index was based on
Mukha (1980).
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
was performed to determine the effect
of factors such as pH and phytotoxicity
on agrochemical, allelopathic, and
microbiological characteristics of the soil. The
probability of influence factors was estimated
by the significance level (P) and Fisher’s test
(F). The data presented in the tables and
figures are averages and standard deviation
of the mean (SD). Five replicates were used
in each treatment. Experimental data were
statistically analyzed using Statistica 10.0 and
Microsoft Excel software.
Results and discussion
The investigation of the soil samples under
hardy kiwifruit indicates various carbon
concentrations in the different habitats.
The lowest value of carbon concentration
was detected in Haplic Luvisols from Linyi
(Table 1). Salic Solonetz from Harbin contained
2.5 times more carbon than Haplic Luvisols.
The carbon concentration was higher in Luvic
Chernozems from Jiamusi and Calcic Luvisols
from NBG (Kyiv).
Soil with the pH 5.5–6.0 is suggested to
be the best for the hardy kiwifruit cultivation
(Strik, 2005). Thus, Luvic Chernozems (Jiamusi)
is the most suitable for the cultivation of hardy
kiwifruit, in contrast to Salic Solonetz from
Harbin with alkaline reaction. The last can
be considered as unfavorable for this crop
Soil samples
рН (1M KCl) Available nutrients, mg·g-1
C, %
Min Max Mean N P K Fe Mn
Linyi, Shandong
province (Haplic
Luvisols)
3.9 4.4 4.2 0.26 ± 0.08 0.84 ± 0.05 1.37 ± 0.04 5.00 ± 0.04 0.70 ± 0.02 1.1
Harbin,
Heilongjiang
province (Salic
Solonetz)
7.8 8.5 8.3 0.24 ± 0.04 0.11 ± 0.02 3.62 ± 0.06 4.37 ± 0.07 0.30 ± 0.02 2.6
Jiamusi,
Heilongjiang
province (Luvic
Chernozems)
4.7 5.9 5.6 0.28 ± 0.06 0.28 ± 0.09 4.57 ± 0.09 15.0 ± 0.08 0.25 ± 0.08 3.9
NBG, Kyiv
(Calcic Luvisols) 6.9 7.5 7.3 0.17 ± 0.05 0.22 ± 0.02 2.35 ± 0.01 4.60 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.01 3.6
Table 1. Agrochemical characteristics of soils under Actinidia arguta plants, air-dried samples.
6 Plant Introduction • 85/86
N.V. Zaimenko, N.A. Pavlіuchenko, N.E. Ellanska, B.O. Ivanytska, I.P. Kharytonova et al.
because the availability of nutrients varies
with pH. The availability of nitrogen and
phosphorus decreases at pH ≥ 8. Salic Solonetz
from Harbin contained the lowest phosphorus
concentration among the tested samples.
As one of the vital nutrients, potassium is
essential for the soil water regime. A. arguta was
reported to be rich in potassium (Latocha, 2017).
Haplic Luvisols from Linyi was characterized by
1.7–3.3 times lower concentration of potassium
as compared to the rest of the analyzed soil
samples. Moreover, the content of this nutrient
was probably affected by the soil texture. Сlay,
loam, and heavy sandy-loam soils tend toward
higher levels of potassium than sandy and
sandy-loam ones.
Relationships between pH and soil-forming
environmental factors (climate, parent material,
and topography) in Southwestern China were
previously observed (Zhang et al., 2019). Soil
pH affects the mobility and bioavailability of
nutrients, microbiological activity, plant growth,
and development (Neina, 2019). Therefore,
we analyzed the relationships between soil
pH and agrochemical, microbiological and
allelopathic characteristics of the studied
soils. Results of the analysis of variance
(ANOVA) showed that pH factor significantly
affected the soil agrochemical characteristics
such as the concentrations of phosphorus,
iron, and manganese (Table 2). Phosphorus
concentration prevailed in Haplic Luvisols
from Linyi. At the same time, low pH reduced
the availability of several nutrients, particularly
phosphorus. The highest level of iron was in
Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi. The maximum
concentration of manganese in Haplic Luvisols
from Linyi was observed. Low pH values
raised the solubility of toxic forms of iron and
manganese, which can have an unfavorable
impact on plant growth and development.
The biochemical state of the soil was
evaluated by the values of the oxidation-
reduction potential (redox potential or Eh). Soil
Eh is dynamic and dependent on many factors,
i.e., aeration, temperature, humidity, organic
matter, the enzyme activity of microorganisms
(Husson, 2013). Redox potential is used as an
indicator of the content of biogenic forms and
toxins in the soil environment (Husson, 2013).
It was shown that the reduction processes
of different intensity levels were dominant in
soil samples under A. arguta. The pH factor
contributed to the change in the Eh values
Indicator SS effect df effect MS effect SS error df error MS error F P
N 33639 16 2102 3458 3 1152.5 1.8243 0.34347
P 1581806 16 98863 8251 3 2750.3 35.9458 0.00651
K 27200292 16 1700018 1807871 3 602623.5 2.8210 0.21345
Fe 447666539 16 27979159 146321 3 48773.7 573.6530 0.00010
Mn 752134 16 47008 2243 3 747.7 62.8734 0.00285
C 2275 16 142 91 3 30.3 4.6875 0.114310
Eh 216656 16 13541 40406 3 13468.5 11.0054 0.00580
Phenolics 151381 16 9461 83233 3 27744.3 0.3410 0.93467
Micromycetes 14329 16 896 132 3 44.0 20.3537 0.01494
Actinomycetes 122 16 8 93 3 30.8 0.2474 0.97430
Ammonifiers 684 16 43 85 3 28.3 1.5078 0.41333
Inorganic
nitrogen
consumers
2233 16 140 859 3 286.3 0.4874 0.85288
Soil
phytotoxicity 401401 16 25088 245026 3 81675.2 0.3072 0.95071
Table 2. ANOVA results. The effect of pH on the agrochemical, allelopathic, and microbiological
characteristics of the soil.
Note: SS – the sum of squares, df – degrees of freedom, MS – the mean sum of squares, F – Fisher’s test,
P – significance level.
Plant Introduction • 85/86 7
Analysis of the soil environment for Actinidia arguta cultivated in Ukraine and China
(Table 2). Moreover, the redox potential
decreased with the increase of pH values (Fig. 1).
This fact reflects the intensifying in reduction
processes. Thus, the maximum reduction
was recorded in the soil from Harbin, which
was characterized by an alkaline reaction.
The observed tendency was also described
for other types of soil (Husson, 2013). The
observed reduction conditions (Eh < 400 mV)
in the investigated soils indicated a slowdown
in the humification process. It also may reflect
the presence of mobile forms of organic
compounds that can be involved in allelopathic
interactions.
Phenolic compounds are considered to be
one of the essential classes of allelochemicals.
They are widespread in the plant world and
have versatile effects on crucial physiological
and biochemical processes such as respiration,
photosynthesis, growth, and development
(Li et al., 2010).
Fruits, leaves, and roots of A. arguta have
a high content of phenolic compounds with
allelopathic effects, that can be released into
the root environment by leaching, decay of
plant residues or in the form of root exudates
(Zuo et al., 2012; Teng et al., 2013; Nishimura
et al., 2016; Park, 2017; Latocha, 2017; Almeida
et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018). The most important
of them are flavan-3-ols, flavonols, phenolic
acids, and anthocyanins, in particular, such as
quercetin and kaempherol derivatives, as well
as hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, gallic,
caffeic, chlorogenic, 2, 4-dihydroxybenzoic
acids, catechin, epicatechin and rutin (Latocha,
2017; Almeida et al., 2018).
Therefore, we considered it necessary to
investigate the concentration of phenolic
compounds in the rhizosphere soil of
A. arguta. The investigated soils differed in the
concentration of phenolic compounds (Fig. 2).
Their lowest concentration was determined in
the soil from M.M. Gryshko National Botanical
Garden. In the soils from Harbin and Linyi, the
total concentration of phenolic compounds
prevailed. It should be noted that these soil
samples were characterized by the lowest
carbon content (Table 1).
The accumulation of free phenolic
compounds was due to a violation of the
humification process. At the same time, the
dominance of intensively reducing conditions
in the soil from Harbin contributed to the
formation of the highest amount of organic
substances with phenolic groups.
The soil phytotoxicity under the plants of
A. arguta reached 20–70 % compared to the
control (Fig. 3). It was the smallest for Calcic
Luvisols from NBG and the largest for Salic
Solonetz from Harbin.
Soil phytotoxicity factor showed the most
substantial effect on the concentrations of
phenolic compounds, iron, and manganese
(Table 3). The effect of the phytotoxicity factor
was the greatest concerning the accumulation
of phenolic allelochemicals.
The soil microbiota provides the
decomposition of the complex organic
Figure 1. The value of the redox potential (Eh) with different pH of soil under Actinidia arguta plants, mV:
1 – Haplic Luvisols, Linyi (Shandong province, China); 2 – Salic Solonetz, Harbin (Heilongjiang province,
China); 3 – Luvic Chernozems, Jiamusi (Heilongjiang province, China); 4 – Calcic Luvisols, NBG (Kyiv, Ukraine).
Error bars: SD (standard deviation of the mean), n = 5.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Eh
, m
V
pH
1
2
3
4
4.2 5.6 7.3 8.3
8 Plant Introduction • 85/86
N.V. Zaimenko, N.A. Pavlіuchenko, N.E. Ellanska, B.O. Ivanytska, I.P. Kharytonova et al.
compounds into the nutrients available for
plants (Li et al., 2017b). Consequently, the study
of microbiocoenosis allows to understand the
direction of microbiological processes and to
predict changes in soil conditions, which can be
used to create and to improve crop cultivation
techniques. In turn, these benefits sustain the
conservation and remediation of soil fertility
as the prerequisite for good productivity of the
whole agro-ecosystem. Chinese researchers
observed that soil treatment with beneficial
microbiota increased the kiwifruit yield and
enhanced the crop resistance for diseases
(Li et al., 2017а). Nevertheless, there is no data
about the abundance of main taxonomical and
ecological trophic groups of microbiota as well
as the direction of microbiologic processes in
soils under A. arguta.
pH factor significantly influenced the
abundance of micromycetes (Table 2).
Among the samples from the several Chinese
provinces, Haplic Luvisols from Linyi was
characterized with the highest abundance of
micromycetes (Table 4). Therefore, this trend
was the consequence of the lowest pH (4.2) of
the corresponded plot (Table 1).
Figure 2. Phenolic compounds concentration in soil under Actinidia arguta plants, mg GAE (gallic acid
equivalent)/kg: 1 – Haplic Luvisols, Linyi (Shandong province, China); 2 – Salic Solonetz, Harbin (Heilongjiang
province, China); 3 – Luvic Chernozems, Jiamusi (Heilongjiang province, China); 4 – Calcic Luvisols, NBG
(Kyiv, Ukraine). Error bars: SD (standard deviation of the mean), n = 5.
Figure 3. Soil phytotoxicity under Actinidia arguta plants (bioassay – roots growth of Lepidium sativum),
% control: 1 – Haplic Luvisols, Linyi (Shandong province, China); 2 – Salic Solonetz, Harbin (Heilongjiang
province, China); 3 – Luvic Chernozems, Jiamusi (Heilongjiang province, China); 4 – Calcic Luvisols, NBG
(Kyiv, Ukraine). Error bars: SD (standard deviation of the mean), n = 5.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
m
g
GA
E/
kg
1
2
3
4
0
20
40
60
80
100
%
c
on
tr
ol
1
2
3
4
Plant Introduction • 85/86 9
Analysis of the soil environment for Actinidia arguta cultivated in Ukraine and China
Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi with
weakly acid reaction was rich in soil fungi,
and Salic Solonetz from Harbin with weakly
alkaline reaction was deficient in them
(Fig. 4). Soil samples from NBG outstood with
the lowest abundance of this microbiota
group, but the higher level of actinomycetes
as compare with Chinese samples (Fig. 5).
Among the studied groups of microbiota,
the abundance of micromycetes was the
most sensitive to soil phytotoxicity (Table 3).
Ammonifiers showed the least response to
soil phytotoxicity.
It was observed the slight difference of
ammonifier abundance between the analyzed
samples. The soil from Harbin was the poorest,
and from NBG was the richest in this group
of the microbiota. At the same time, nitrogen
Indicator SS effect df effect MS effect SS error df error MS error F P
N 34674 11 3152 2423.0 8 302.88 10.41 0.001359
P 1586954 11 144269 3102.5 8 387.81 372.01 0.000000
K 28645457 11 2604132 362705.5 8 45338.19 57.44 0.000002
Fe 447189507 11 40653592 623353 8 77919.13 521.74 0.000000
Mn 749124 11 68102 5252.5 8 656.56 503.73 0.000000
C 2362 11 215 4.0 8 0.50 429.45 0.000000
Eh 591377 11 28161 437506.0 8 7172.00 3.92637 0.000015
Phenolics 234601 11 21327 12.5 8 1.56 13649.53 0.000000
Micromycetes 14107 11 1282 354.0 8 44.25 28.98 0.000031
Actinomycetes 202 11 18 13.0 8 1.63 11.28 0.001024
Ammonifiers 688 11 63 81.0 8 10.13 6.17 0.007905
Inorganic
nitrogen
consumers
2984 11 271 107.5 8 13.44 20.19 0.000122
рН 5456 11 496 221.0 8 27.63 17.96 0.000189
Table 3. ANOVA results. The effect of phytotoxicity on the agrochemical, allelopathic, and microbiological
characteristics of the soil.
Note: SS – the sum of squares, df – degrees of freedom, MS – the mean sum of squares, F – Fisher’s test,
P – significance level.
Soil samples
M
ic
ro
m
yc
et
es
,
×1
03 C
FU
Ac
tin
om
yc
et
es
,
×1
06 C
FU
Am
m
on
ifi
er
s,
×1
06 C
FU
In
or
ga
ni
c
ni
tr
og
en
co
ns
um
er
s,
×1
06 C
FU
C
oe
ffi
ci
en
t o
f
m
in
er
al
iz
at
io
n-
im
m
ob
ili
za
tio
n
of
n
itr
og
en
SO
M
tr
an
sf
or
m
at
io
n
in
de
x
Linyi, Shandong province (Haplic Luvisols) 88.1 ± 4.8 0.5 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.3 3.6 ± 0.4 0.9 8.7
Harbin, Heilongjiang province (Salic
Solonetz)
15.0 ± 1.6 0.3 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.05 3.7 ± 0.4 1.2 5.8
Jiamusi, Heilongjiang province (Luvic
Chernozems)
46.4 ± 16.3 0.5 ± 0.1 3.9 ± 0.8 5.9 ± 0.5 1.5 6.5
NBG, Kyiv (Calcic Luvisols) 26.3 ± 4.8 1.2 ± 0.1 4.4 ± 1.0 7.1 ± 0.1 1.6 7.1
Table 4. The abundance of the main taxonomical and ecotrophic groups of microbiota in soils under
Actinidia arguta plants.
Note: CFU – colony-forming unit, SOM – soil organic matter.
10 Plant Introduction • 85/86
N.V. Zaimenko, N.A. Pavlіuchenko, N.E. Ellanska, B.O. Ivanytska, I.P. Kharytonova et al.
immobilizing microbiota was 1.5 times more
abundant in Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi,
and 2.0 times – in Calcic Luvisols from NBG,
as compared with the rest analyzed soil types.
Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi and Calcic
Luvisols from NBG exhibited the amplification
of the processes of SOM mineralization.
Altogether, the low values of the SOM
transformation index can be the result of the
input of organic matter in soils on insignificant
levels.
Conclusions
The dissimilarities in the concentrations of
carbon, macro- and micronutrients, phenolic
allelochemicals, Eh values, and abundance of
soil microbiota in the examined soil samples
were shown.
The results of the analysis of variance
(ANOVA) showed that the investigated factors
such as pH and phytotoxicity significantly
influenced the agrochemical, allelopathic
and microbiological characteristics of the
soils under A. arguta soil. pH factor affected
1 2
3 4
Figure 4. Diversity of micromycetes in soils under Actinidia arguta plants: 1 – Haplic Luvisols, Linyi (Shandong
province, China); 2 – Salic Solonetz, Harbin (Heilongjiang province, China); 3 – Luvic Chernozems, Jiamusi
(Heilongjiang province, China); 4 – Calcic Luvisols, NBG (Kyiv, Ukraine).
Plant Introduction • 85/86 11
Analysis of the soil environment for Actinidia arguta cultivated in Ukraine and China
Eh, the abundance of micromycetes, the
concentrations of phosphorus, iron, and
manganese. Soil phytotoxicity factor showed
the most potent effect on the concentrations
of phenolic compounds, iron, and manganese.
The relationship between the phytotoxicity
and the abundance of the main taxonomical
and ecotrophic groups of microbiota in soils
under A. arguta was ascertained.
Among the analyzed soil samples,
carbon concentration was the highest in
Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi and Calcic
Luvisols from NBG. The reduction conditions
(Eh < 400 mV) in the soils under A. arguta
might slow down the humification processes.
A similar effect may be caused by mobile
forms of organic compounds with allelopathic
properties. The redox potential decreased with
the increase of pH values. In the soils from
Harbin and Linyi, the total content of phenolic
allelochemicals prevailed. Salic Solonetz from
Harbin contained the lowest phosphorus
concentration among the tested samples.
Meanwhile, the highest level of iron
was in Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi.
In Haplic Luvisols from Linyi, the maximum
concentration of manganese was observed. Low
pH values increase the solubility of toxic forms
of iron and manganese, which can adversely
affect plant growth and development. The soil
phytotoxicity under the plants of A. arguta
reached 20-70 % compared to the control.
It was the lowest for Calcic Luvisols from NBG
and the largest for Salic Solonetz from Harbin.
Overall, Calcic Luvisols from NBG and Luvic
Chernozems from Jiamusi were determined
to be the most favorable conditions for the
A. arguta cultivation. Salic Solonetz (Harbin)
and Haplic Luvisols (Linyi) were less suitable
for A. arguta plants. Perspective is further
research aimed at developing measures to
improve the soil conditions for A. arguta plants.
References
Almeida, D., Pinto, D., Santos, J., Vinha, A.F., Palmeira, J.,
Ferreira, H. N., Rodrigues, F., & Oliveira, M. B. P. P.
(2018). Hardy kiwifruit leaves (Actinidia arguta): an
extraordinary source of value-added compounds
for food industry. Food Chemistry, 259, 113–121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.113
Andreiuk, К. І., Iutynska, G. О., Antypchuk, А. F.,
Valagurova, O. V., Kozyryc’ka, V. J., &
Ponomarenko, S. P. (2001). Soil microbial cenoses
functioning in the conditions of anthropogenic
burden. Кyiv: Oberegy. (In Ukrainian)
Drzewiecki, J., Latocha, P., Leontowicz, H.,
Leontowicz, M., Park, Y. S., Najman, K., Weisz M.,
Ezra, A., & Gorinstein, S. (2016). Analytical
methods applied to characterization of Actinidia
arguta, Actinidia deliciosa, and Actinidia eriantha kiwi
fruit cultivars. Food Analytical Methods, 9(5), 1353–
1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0309-1
Figure 5. The abundance of actinomycetes in soils under Actinidia arguta plants: 1 – Haplic Luvisols, Linyi
(Shandong province, China); 2 – Calcic Luvisols, NBG (Kyiv, Ukraine).
1 2
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.113
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0309-1
12 Plant Introduction • 85/86
N.V. Zaimenko, N.A. Pavlіuchenko, N.E. Ellanska, B.O. Ivanytska, I.P. Kharytonova et al.
Fiedler, S., Vepraskas, M. J., & Richardson, J. L.
(2007). Soil redox potential: Importance, field
measurements and observations. Advanced in
Agronomy, 94, 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0065-2113(06)94001-2
Grodzinskij, A. M., Gorobec, S. A., & Krupa, L. I. (1988).
Guidance on the application of biochemical methods
in allelopathic studies of soil. Kyiv. (In Russian)
Grodzinskij, A. M., Kostroma, E. J., Shrol, T. S., &
Hohlova, I. G. (1990). Direct bioassay methods
of soil and microorganisms metabolites. In
Allelopathy and plant productivity: Collection of
scientific papers (pp. 121–124). Kyiv: Naukova
dumka. (In Russian)
Ha, J. S., Jin, D. E., Park, S. K., Park, C. H.,
Seung, T. W., Bae, D.-W., Kim, D.-O., & Heo, H. J.
(2015). Antiamnesic effect of Actinidia arguta
extract intake in a mouse model of TMT-induced
learning and memory dysfunction. Evidence-Based
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015,
876484. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/876484
Husson, O. (2013). Redox potential (Eh) and pH as
drivers of soil/plant/microorganisms systems: a
transdisciplinary overview pointing to integrative
opportunities for agronomy. Plant and Soil,
362(1–2), 389–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11104-012-1429-7
IUSS Working Group WRB. (2015). World reference
base for soil resources 2014, update 2015.
International soil classification system for
naming soils and creating legends for soil maps.
World Soil Resources Reports, 106, 1–192.
Jho, E. H., Kang, K., Lee, H. J., Kim, C. Y., Shin, I.-S.,
& Nho, C. W. (2011). Hepatoprotective effects of
Actinidia arguta against oxidative stress induced
by tert-butyl hydroperoxide. Cancer Prevention
Research, 16, 74–79.
Labuda, S. Z., & Vetchinnikov, A. A. (2011). Soil
susceptibility on reduction as an index of soil
properties applied in the investigation upon soil
devastation. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
S, 18(3), 333–344.
Latocha, P. (2017). The nutritional and health
benefits of kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta) – a review.
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 72, 325–334.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-017-0637-y
Li, H., Liao, Q., & Ran, L. (2017a). Study on the effect
of soil beneficial microorganisms on the growth of
kiwifruit. Biomedical Research, Special Issue, S200–S207.
Li, H.-Y., Yuan, Q., Yang, Y.-L., Han, Q.-H., He, J.-
L., Zhao, L., Zhang, Q., Liu, S.-X., Lin, D.-R.,
Wu, D.-T., & Qin, W. (2018). Phenolic profiles,
antioxidant capacities, and inhibitory effects
on digestive enzymes of different kiwifruits.
Molecules, 23(11), 2957. https://doi.org/10.3390/
molecules23112957
Li, S., Peng, M., Liu, Z., & Shah, S. S. (2017b). The
role of soil microbes in promoting plant growth.
Molecular Microbiology Research, 7(4), 30–37.
https://doi.org/10.5376/mmr.2017.07.0004
Li, Z.-H., Wang, Q., Ruan, X., Pan, C.-D., & Jiang,
D.-A. (2010). Phenolics and plant allelopathy.
Molecules, 15(12), 8933–8952. https://doi.
org/10.3390/molecules15128933
Mikami-Konishide, I., Murakami, S., Nakanishi, K.,
Takahashi, Y., Yamaguchi, M., Shioya, T.,
Watanabe, J., & Hino, A. (2013). Antioxidant
capacity and polyphenol content of extracts
from crops cultivated in Japan, and the effect
of cultivation environment. Food Science and
Technology Research, 19(1), 69–79. https://doi.
org/10.3136/fstr.19.69
Mukha, V. D. (1980). About characteristics, reflecting
intensity and directivity of soil processes.
Proceedings of Kharkov Agriculture Institute, 273,
13–16. (In Russian)
Neina, D. (2019). The role of soil pH in plant
nutrition and soil remediation. Applied and
Environmental Soil Science, 2019, 5794869. https://
doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869
Nishimura, M., Okimasu, Y., Miyake, N., Tada, M.,
Hida, R., Negishi, T., & Arimoto-Kobayashi, S.
(2016). Inhibitory effect of Actinidia arguta
on mutagenesis, inflammation and two-
stage mouse skin tumorigenesis. Genes and
Environment, 38, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s41021-016-0053-9
Park, Y. (2017). Morphological characteristics
and antioxidant activity changes in ‘Autumn
Sense’ hardy kiwi (Actinidia arguta) as honey
plant during fruit ripening. Journal of Apiculture,
32(4), 327–332. https://doi.org/10.17519/
apiculture.2017.11.32.4.327
Pinto, T., & Vilela, A. (2018). Kiwifruit, a botany,
chemical and sensory approach a review. Advances
in Plants & Agriculture Research, 8(6), 383–390.
https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2018.08.00355
Richards, S., Hewson, K., Moller, H., Wharton, D.,
Campbell, H., Benge, J., & Manhire, J. (2007).
Soil biota as indicators of soil quality in organic
and integrated management kiwifruit orchards
in New Zealand. Acta Horticulturae, 753, 627–632.
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.753.82
Rinkis, G. J., & Nollendorf, V. F. (1982). Balanced
nutrition of plants with macro- and microelements.
Riga: Zinatne. (In Russian)
Skrypchenko, N. V. (2002). Introduction of genus
Actinidia Lindl. species in the Forest-Steppe of
Ukraine (growth, development, peculiarities of
propagation) [PhD thesis abstract, M.M. Gryshko
National Botanical Garden of National Academy
of Sciences of Ukraine]. Kyiv. (In Ukrainian)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)94001-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)94001-2
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/876484
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1429-7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1429-7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-017-0637-y
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23112957
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23112957
https://doi.org/10.5376/mmr.2017.07.0004
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15128933
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15128933
https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.19.69
https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.19.69
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-016-0053-9
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-016-0053-9
https://doi.org/10.17519/apiculture.2017.11.32.4.327
https://doi.org/10.17519/apiculture.2017.11.32.4.327
https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2018.08.00355
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.753.82
Plant Introduction • 85/86 13
Analysis of the soil environment for Actinidia arguta cultivated in Ukraine and China
Skrypchenko, N., & Latocha, P. (2017). The
genesis and current state of Actinidia collection
in M.M. Grishko National Botanical Garden in
Ukraine. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences, 32(3),
513–525.
State Standard of Ukraine. (2003). Determination of
pH (ISO 10390:1994, IDT), SSTU ISO 1039-2001. Кyiv:
Derzhspozhyvstandard Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian)
Stefaniak, J., Sawicka, M., Krupa, T., Latocha, P., &
Łata, B. (2017a). Effect of kiwiberry pre-storage
treatments on the fruit quality during cold
storage. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 104(3), 235–242.
https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2017.104.030
Stefaniak, J., Stasiak, A., Latocha, P., & Łata, B.
(2017b). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on Actinidia
arguta plants vigour and soil characteristics.
Agriculture & Food, 5, 314–323. https://www.
scientific-publications.net/en/article/1001422/
Strik, B. (2005). Growing kiwifruit. Retrieved from
https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/
pnw507
Teng, K., Ruan, H.-S., & Zhang, H.-F. (2013). Flavonoid
and saponin rich fractions of kiwi roots (Actinidia
arguta (Sieb.et Zucc.) Planch) with antinociceptive
and anti-inflammatory effects. African Journal of
Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 7(35), 2445–2451.
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP2013.3535
Tepper, Е. Z., Shilnikova, V. К., & Pereverzeva, G. I.
(2004). Microbiology practicum. Мoscow: Drofa.
(In Russian)
Zhang, Y.-Y., Wu, W., & Liu, H. (2019). Factors
affecting variations of soil pH in different
horizons in hilly regions. PLOS One, 14(6),
e0218563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0218563
Zuo, L.-L., Wang, Z.-Y., Fan, Z.-L., Tian, S.-Q., &
Liu, J.-R. (2012). Evaluation of antioxidant and
antiproliferative properties of three Actinidia
(Actinidia kolomikta, Actinidia arguta, Actinidia
chinensis) extracts in vitro. International Journal of
Molecular Sciences, 13(5), 5506–5518. https://doi.
org/10.3390/ijms13055506
Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних
особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex
Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю
Н.В. Заіменко 1*, Н.А. Павлюченко 1, Н.Е. Eллaнська 1, Б.О. Іваницька 1, I.П. Харитонова 1, O.П. Юношева 1,
Н.В. Скрипченко 1, П. Чжан 2, Д. Лю 2, Ц. Шень 2, Л. Тянь 2
1 Національний ботанічний сад імені М. М. Гришка НАН України, вул. Тімірязєвська 1, Київ, 01014,
Україна; * zaimenkonv@ukr.net
2 Коледж наук про життя, Цзямуський університет (Китайсько-Українська міжнародна спільна
лабораторія з розробки та застосування технології для сільського й лісового господарства), Цзямуси,
154007, Китай
Мета – оцінити агрохімічні, алелопатичні та мікробіологічні особливості ґрунтового середовища
рослин Actinidia arguta, що культивуються в Україні та у двох провінціях Китаю.
Матеріал та методи. Зразки ризосферного ґрунту були відібрані на глибині 0–15 см під рослинами
A. arguta у фазі достигання плодів в Україні (Київ: Північ України, Лісостеп, помірно континентальний
клімат) та двох провінціях Китаю (Шаньдун: Схід Китаю, помірний пояс з мусонним кліматом; та
Хейлунцзян: Північно-Східний Китай, континентальний мусонний клімат). Визначали концентрації
вуглецю, а також доступних форм макро- і мікроелементів, фенольних сполук у ґрунтових зразках.
Вимірювали pH та редокс-потенціал ґрунту. Фітотоксичність ґрунту вивчали методом прямого
біотестування за приростом коренів крес-салату (Lepidium sativum). Проводили мікробіологічні
аналізи ґрунтових зразків.
Результати. Показано відмінності у концентрації вуглецю, мікро- та макроелементів у
досліджуваних ґрунтах. Панування відновних процесів (Eh < 400 mV) у ґрунті під рослинами A.
аrguta вказує на сповільнення процесу гуміфікації та наявність рухливих форм органічних сполук з
алелопатичними властивостями. Зі збільшенням значень рН редокс потенціал ґрунту знижувався,
що свідчить про посилення відновних процесів. Фітотоксичність ґрунту під рослинами A. аrguta
https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2017.104.030
https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1001422/
https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1001422/
https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/pnw507
https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/pnw507
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP2013.3535
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218563
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218563
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13055506
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13055506
14 Plant Introduction • 85/86
N.V. Zaimenko, N.A. Pavlіuchenko, N.E. Ellanska, B.O. Ivanytska, I.P. Kharytonova et al.
сягала 20–70 % порівняно з контролем, що, ймовірно, пов’язано із акумуляцією фенольних сполук,
а також заліза та мангану. Встановлено взаємозв’язки між pH, фітотоксичністю та чисельністю
основних таксономічних та еколого-трофічних груп мікроорганізмів у ґрунтах під рослинами
A. arguta.
Висновки. Кальцієві лювісолі з Національного ботанічного саду імені М.М. Гришка НАН України
(м. Київ, Україна) та чорнозем з м. Цзямуси (провінція Хейлунцзян, Китай) виявилися найбільш
сприятливими для зростання A. arguta. Солонці з м. Харбін (провінція Хейлунцзян) та типові лювісолі
з м. Ліньї (провінція Шаньдун, Китай) були найменш придатними для рослин A. arguta.
Ключові слова: мінеральні елементи, фенольні алелохімікати, фітотоксичність, мікроорганізми, мікроміцети, бактерії
|
| id | oai:ojs2.plantintroduction.org:article-1541 |
| institution | Plant Introduction |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-07-17T12:53:34Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | wwwplantintroductionorg/5a/5d502c98482b0dbd7d75469613c7e75a.pdf |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.plantintroduction.org:article-15412023-08-26T20:39:45Z Comparative analysis of agrochemical, allelopathic and microbiological characteristics of the soil environment for Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. cultivated in Ukraine and two provinces of China Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю Zaimenko, N.V. Pavlіuchenko, N.A. Ellanska, N.E. Ivanytska, B.O. Kharytonova, I.P. Yunosheva, O.P. Skrypchenko, N.V. Zhang, P. Liu, D. Shen, J. Tian, L. The objective of this study was to evaluate agrochemical, allelopathic and microbiological characteristics of the soil under Actinidia arguta plants cultivated in Ukraine and two provinces of China. Material and methods. The rhizosphere soil was sampled at 0–15&nbsp;cm layer under A. arguta plants in the stage of fruit ripening in Ukraine (Kyiv city: North of Ukraine, Forest-Steppe zone, a temperate continental climate) and two provinces of China (Shandong: East China, a temperate monsoon zone; and Heilongjiang: Northeast China, continental monsoon climate). The concentrations of carbon, available forms of macro- and micronutrients, phenolic compounds in the soil samples were determined. pH and redox potential of soil were measured. Soil phytotoxicity was studied by direct bioassay method on cress (Lepidium sativum) root growth. Microbiological analyses of soil samples were conducted. Results. The dissimilarities in the concentrations of carbon, macro- and micronutrients in the examined soil samples were shown. The reduction conditions (Eh &lt; 400 mV) in the soils under A. аrguta might slow down the humification processes. A similar effect may be caused by mobile forms of organic compounds with allelopathic properties. The redox potential decreased with the increase of pH values. This fact reflects the intensifying of reduction processes. The soil phytotoxicity under A. аrguta reached 20–70 % compared with the control, probably due to the accumulation of phenolic compounds, as well as iron and manganese. In soils under A. аrguta, the relationship between pH, phytotoxicity, and the abundance of main taxonomical and ecotrophic groups of microorganisms was evaluated. Conclusions. Calcic Luvisols from the M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv city, Ukraine) and Luvic Chernozems from Jiamusi (Heilongjiang province, China) were determined to be the most favorable for A. arguta cultivation. Salic Solonetz from Harbin (Heilongjiang province, China) and Haplic Luvisols from Linyi (Shandong province, China) had the least suitable soil conditions for A.&nbsp;arguta. Мета – оцінити агрохімічні, алелопатичні та мікробіологічні особливості ґрунтового середовища рослин Actinidia arguta, що культивуються в Україні та у двох провінціях Китаю. Матеріал та методи. Зразки ризосферного ґрунту були відібрані на глибині 0–15 см під рослинами A.&nbsp;arguta у фазі достигання плодів в Україні (Київ: Північ України, Лісостеп, помірно континентальний клімат) та двох провінціях Китаю (Шаньдун: Схід Китаю, помірний пояс з мусонним кліматом; та Хейлунцзян: Північно-Східний Китай, континентальний мусонний клімат). Визначали концентрації вуглецю, а також доступних форм макро- і мікроелементів, фенольних сполук у ґрунтових зразках. Вимірювали pH та редокс-потенціал ґрунту. Фітотоксичність ґрунту вивчали методом прямого біотестування за приростом коренів крес-салату (Lepidium sativum). Проводили мікробіологічні аналізи ґрунтових зразків. Результати. Показано відмінності у концентрації вуглецю, мікро- та макроелементів у досліджуваних ґрунтах. Панування відновних процесів (Eh &lt; 400 mV) у ґрунті під рослинами A. аrguta вказує на сповільнення процесу гуміфікації та наявність рухливих форм органічних сполук з алелопатичними властивостями. Зі збільшенням значень рН редокс потенціал ґрунту знижувався, що свідчить про посилення відновних процесів. Фітотоксичність ґрунту під рослинами A. аrguta сягала 20–70 % порівняно з контролем, що, ймовірно, пов’язано із акумуляцією фенольних сполук, а також заліза та мангану. Встановлено взаємозв’язки між pH, фітотоксичністю та чисельністю основних таксономічних та еколого-трофічних груп мікроорганізмів у ґрунтах під рослинами A.&nbsp;arguta. Висновки. Кальцієві лювісолі з Національного ботанічного саду імені М.М. Гришка НАН України (м. Київ, Україна) та чорнозем з м. Цзямуси (провінція Хейлунцзян, Китай) виявилися найбільш сприятливими для зростання A. arguta. Солонці з м.&nbsp;Харбін (провінція Хейлунцзян) та типові лювісолі з м.&nbsp;Ліньї (провінція Шаньдун, Китай) були найменш придатними для рослин A.&nbsp;arguta. M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine 2020-06-30 Article Article application/pdf https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/1541 10.46341/PI2020002 Plant Introduction; No 85/86 (2020); 3-14 Інтродукція Рослин; № 85/86 (2020); 3-14 2663-290X 1605-6574 10.46341/PI85-86 en https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/1541/1482 Copyright (c) 2020 N.V. Zaimenko, N.A. Pavlіuchenko, N.E. Ellanska, B.O. Ivanytska, I.P. Kharytonova, O.P. Yunosheva, N.V. Skrypchenko, P. Zhang, D. Liu, J. Shen, L. Tian http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Zaimenko, N.V. Pavlіuchenko, N.A. Ellanska, N.E. Ivanytska, B.O. Kharytonova, I.P. Yunosheva, O.P. Skrypchenko, N.V. Zhang, P. Liu, D. Shen, J. Tian, L. Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю |
| title | Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю |
| title_alt | Comparative analysis of agrochemical, allelopathic and microbiological characteristics of the soil environment for Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. cultivated in Ukraine and two provinces of China |
| title_full | Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю |
| title_fullStr | Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю |
| title_full_unstemmed | Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю |
| title_short | Порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. в Україні та двох провінціях Китаю |
| title_sort | порівняльний аналіз агрохімічних, алелопатичних та мікробіологічних особливостей ґрунтового середовища actinidia arguta (siebold et zucc.) planch. ex miq. в україні та двох провінціях китаю |
| url | https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/1541 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zaimenkonv comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT pavlíuchenkona comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT ellanskane comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT ivanytskabo comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT kharytonovaip comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT yunoshevaop comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT skrypchenkonv comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT zhangp comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT liud comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT shenj comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT tianl comparativeanalysisofagrochemicalallelopathicandmicrobiologicalcharacteristicsofthesoilenvironmentforactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqcultivatedinukraineandtwoprovincesofchina AT zaimenkonv porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT pavlíuchenkona porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT ellanskane porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT ivanytskabo porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT kharytonovaip porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT yunoshevaop porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT skrypchenkonv porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT zhangp porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT liud porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT shenj porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû AT tianl porívnâlʹnijanalízagrohímíčnihalelopatičnihtamíkrobíologíčnihosoblivostejgruntovogoseredoviŝaactinidiaargutasieboldetzuccplanchexmiqvukraínítadvohprovíncíâhkitaû |