Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна)
The species composition, systematics, and ecological-coenotic features of the flora of the local landscape Feofaniya have been analyzed. In total, 650 species of vascular plants have been identified in this area, representing 337 genera and 94 families. It was found that the natural component of the...
Gespeichert in:
| Datum: | 2022 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine
2022
|
| Online Zugang: | https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/1609 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Назва журналу: | Plant Introduction |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Institution
Plant Introduction| _version_ | 1860145126155747328 |
|---|---|
| author | Koniakin, Serhii Gubar, Liubov |
| author_facet | Koniakin, Serhii Gubar, Liubov |
| author_sort | Koniakin, Serhii |
| baseUrl_str | https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2023-08-26T20:38:56Z |
| description | The species composition, systematics, and ecological-coenotic features of the flora of the local landscape Feofaniya have been analyzed. In total, 650 species of vascular plants have been identified in this area, representing 337 genera and 94 families. It was found that the natural component of the flora represents 48.8 %, and synanthropic component represents 51.2 %. The aboriginal fraction includes 469 species from 252 genera and 77 families. Adventive flora is represented by 181 species from 131 genera and 51 families. The flora of the local landscape Feofaniya tends to the flora of broad-leaved forests, but due to synanthropization it has closer ties with the Ancient Mediterranean flora. It is characterized by prevailing of herbaceous plants (555 species or 85.3 %), hemicryptophytes (394 species or 60.6 %), plants with a tap root system (318 species or 48.9 %), with non-rosellate aboveground shoots (430 species or 66.1 %), with summer-green vegetation (621 species or 95.5%), and non-rhizomatous (206 species or 31.7%) type of underground shoots. Based on the analysis of the naturalization of alien plant species in the studied flora, the predominance of kenophytes (111 species) and epecophytes (90 species) was established. Such predominance is associated with significant recreational-touristic and other anthropogenic loads. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.46341/PI2021020 |
| first_indexed | 2025-07-17T12:54:05Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
© The Authors. This content is provided under CC BY 4.0 license.
Plant Introduction, 93/94, 46–61 (2022)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
Serhii Koniakin *, Liubov Gubar **
Institute for Evolutionary Ecology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lebedeva str. 37, 03143 Kyiv, Ukraine;
* ser681@ukr.net; ** ogubar@gmail.com
Received: 20.12.2021 | Accepted: 15.05.2022 | Published online: 20.05.2022
Abstract
The species composition, systematics, and ecological-coenotic features of the flora of the local landscape
Feofaniya have been analyzed. In total, 650 species of vascular plants have been identified in this area,
representing 337 genera and 94 families. It was found that the natural component of the flora represents
48.8 %, and synanthropic component represents 51.2 %. The aboriginal fraction includes 469 species
from 252 genera and 77 families. Adventive flora is represented by 181 species from 131 genera and 51
families. The flora of the local landscape Feofaniya tends to the flora of broad-leaved forests, but due to
synanthropization it has closer ties with the Ancient Mediterranean flora. It is characterized by prevailing
of herbaceous plants (555 species or 85.3 %), hemicryptophytes (394 species or 60.6 %), plants with a
tap root system (318 species or 48.9 %), with non-rosellate aboveground shoots (430 species or 66.1 %),
with summer-green vegetation (621 species or 95.5%), and non-rhizomatous (206 species or 31.7%) type
of underground shoots. Based on the analysis of the naturalization of alien plant species in the studied
flora, the predominance of kenophytes (111 species) and epecophytes (90 species) was established. Such
predominance is associated with significant recreational-touristic and other anthropogenic loads.
Keywords: floristic diversity, systematic structure, alien fraction, local landscape Feofaniya
https://doi.org/10.46341/PI2021020
UDC 581.5 : 582.5/.9/.52 (477–25)
Authors’ contributions: The contribution of each author is equipollent. Koniakin S.M. and Gubar L.M. conducted general field
research and summarized the data for a manuscript. Hence, we evaluate the contribution of each author by 50 %.
Funding: The work contains the results of the scientific project “Population ecology and patterns of distribution of invasive species of
biota on the territory of Ukraine” (state registration number 0120U102580), which is supported by the National Academy of Sciences
of Ukraine.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Introduction
The rapid growth of anthropogenic impact
on the environment is becoming a global
challenge, so the study of flora and vegetation
at the local and regional levels is a crucial task.
As a result of human activities (including the
destruction of natural habitats, deforestation,
and invasion of alien species), rare plant
species and certain biotopes disappear from
nature. In the last decade, environmental
disturbances caused by alien species invasions
were a principal factor in biodiversity loss
and were identified as a growing threat to
environmental sustainability (Rai & Sing, 2020).
Recently, flora and fauna have been
studied in the territories of united territorial
communities, botanical gardens, and
arboretums, which are important for the
inventory and ecological monitoring of
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6715-5707
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-1092
Plant Introduction • 93/94 47
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
biodiversity at the local level. Based on the
results of such studies, annotated lists of
vascular plants in natural and urban areas have
been published (Berezina et al., 2007; Shynder
& Doiko, 2020; Shynder & Negrash, 2021;
Kuzemko et al., 2021; Davydov & Gomlya, 2021).
In terms of floristics and phytocoenotic
composition, the forest-steppe local landscape
Feofaniya is an interesting object. It is located
on the territory of the largest metropolis of
Ukraine – Kyiv city. This place has historical,
educational, recreational, and environmental
value, and, at the same time, it is an indicator
of the condition of the environment of urban
areas (Radchenko et al., 2019).
The first detailed research on the forest
vegetation in the local landscape Feofaniya
was conducted in the 1950’s (Povarnitsyn
& Shendrikov, 1957). The researchers made
complete descriptions of the soil sections
for different types of forest biocoenoses,
particularly oak, hornbeam, pine, and alder.
They also created a scheme of digressive
changes of forest types in hornbeam-oak
forests. Later, in the multivolume edition
“Vegetation of the UkrSSR”, authors revealed
the features of the coenotic and floristic
structure of oak forests in the example of an
oak grove of the local landscape Feofaniya
(Hryn & Bradis, 1971). Deciduous forests with
the participation of Carpinus betulus L. in the
vicinity of Kyiv were studied by Lubchenko
(1983). He made geobotanical descriptions
and established the distribution of regular
forest species and discovered the presence
of Cephalanthera longifolia (L.) Fritsch. Later
Padun (1985) provided a classification (based
on the dominant principle) and detailed
phytocoenocytic characteristics of the
forest phytocoenoses of the local landscape
Feofaniya.
Subsequently, the floristic inventory was
conducted by the staff of the Scientific Centre
for Ecomonitoring and Biodiversity of the
Metropolis of the National Academy of Sciences
of Ukraine (SCEBM) in 2007–2008. They
recorded 156 species of higher vascular plants
in the Feofaniya forests, and over 170 species
– on the open steppe areas (Shelyag-Sosonko
et al., 2009; Radchenko & Bayrak, 2009).
Deciduous forests were classified as belonging
to the class Carpino-fagetea sylvaticae Jakucs
ex Passarge 1968, alliance Carpinion betuli
Issler 1931, association Galeobdolo lutei-
Carpinetum Shevchyk, Bakalyna et Solomakha
1996 (Goncharenko et al., 2013). Individual
loci in the landscape are represented by
the vegetation of Robinietea Jurko ex Hadač
et Sofron 1980, Salicetea purpureae Moor
1958, and Alnetea glutinosae Br.- Bl. et Tx. ex
Westhoff et al. 1946 classes (Shelyag-Sosonko
et al., 2009). In 2009, employees of the SCEBM
planted many rare ephemeroids in the local
landscape Feofaniya to preserve them in situ.
In 2000, Allium ursinum L. was planted in the
hornbeam-oak forest (I and V forest quarters)
and was naturalized as a part of the Galeobdolo
lutei-Carpinetum association (Bayrak &
Hrytsay, 2009). Since 2007, over 50 generative
individuals of A. ursinum have been registered
there. In April 2009, in some deciduous forest
localities, the next ephemeroides were planted:
Scilla siberica Haw. (Hyacinthaceae), Crocus
heuffelianus Herb. (Iridaceae), Erythronium
dens-canis L. (Liliaceae), Galanthus plicatus
M. Bieb., G. nivalis L. (Amaryllidaceae),
and Gymnospermium odessanum (DC.)
Takh. (Berberidaceae). The current state of
cultivated rare plants in those populations is
under evaluation.
In 2014, an inventory of ancient common
oak trees of the Park-Monument of Landscape
Art of National Importance Feofaniya (PMLANI
Feofaniya) was conducted, and an electronic
map of its spatial distribution was created
(Matiashuk et al., 2014). Measures to restore
the age-old oakery by making “windows” in a
tent of the second tier with an area of 0.08 ha
and planting Quercus robur seedlings in
these “windows” were suggested (Klimenko
et al., 2014).
The territory of the local landscape
Feofaniya served as a basis for studying
the population strategy of such alien plant
species spreading spontaneously as Eragrostis
minor Host (Pashkevych, 2015), Іmpatiens
parviflora (L.) DC. (Golivets, 2014a, b),
Аnthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm. (Pashkevych &
Bereznichenko, 2016), Heracleum sosnowskyi
Manden. and H. mantegazzianum Sommier
& Levier (Gubar & Koniakin, 2021), Quercus
rubra L. (Burda, 2018), and Juglans L. (Burda
& Koniakin, 2018). Scientists of the Institute
of Evolutionary Ecology have established
the exact cambial age of centuries-old trees
on this territory (i.e., Quercus robur L., Pinus
sylvestris L., and Tilia cordata Mill.) and
implemented necessary protection measures
48 Plant Introduction • 93/94
S. Koniakin, L. Gubar
(Prokopuk & Krylov, 2018; Prokopuk &
Netsvetov, 2020; Prokopuk et al., 2020). The
resulting complete list of trees occupied by
age-old Querceta roboris in PMLANI Feofaniya
was reported (Klimenko et al., 2014).
At the same time, information on this
local landscape’s current vegetation and
flora remained fragmentary and incomplete.
Therefore, the purpose of the study was to
establish the species composition, structure,
and features of the flora of the local landscape
Feofaniya for further monitoring of the
condition of its vegetation cover.
Material and methods
The vegetation research was carried out on
the territory of the local landscape Feofaniya,
which is located on the southeastern
outskirts of Kyiv at a distance of 15 km
from the city center. The local climate is
temperate continental, characterized by
mild unstable winters. Springs are relatively
dry; summers are warm with enough rainfall.
According to the physical and geographical
zonality, the local landscape Feofaniya is
located in Vasylkiv-Kaharlyk landscape
district of Kyiv Upland landscape region, the
Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine (Marynych
et al., 2003). The relief’s most characteristic
element is the Feofaniya (Khotivska) ravine,
through the valley of which the Feofaniya
stream (belongs to the Vita river basin) flows.
Deep ravines with turfed slopes and narrow
thalwegs trench the landscape (Barshchevska
& Tyutyunnyk, 2014). The landscape includes
a PMLANI Feofaniya, with an area of 150
hectares, which was declared an object of
the Natural reserve fund of Ukraine in 1972
(Alokhin et al., 2009). PMLANI Feofaniya
within the park area is represented by
natural hornbeam-oak forests (Carpinetalia
betuli P. Fukarek 1968) with a high density
of ancient trees and secondary hornbeam
forests. There are wetland areas and
fragments of steppe meadows combined
with artificial phytocoenoses, a cascade of
Feofaniya (Palladinskyi) ponds, and numerous
natural springs and streams (Radchenko &
Bayrak, 2009; Fig. 1). Biotopes classification
for Feofaniya park is developed applying the
dominant-coenotic principle (according to
the EUNIS system) (Pashkevych, 2020).
From 2017 to 2021, the vegetation and of the
local landscape Feofaniya and its taxonomic
composition was investigated in a semi-
stationary way. Based on previous (Burda,
2012) and current investigations, we compiled
a summary of the studied flora. Some of the
findings were confirmed by photos uploaded
to iNaturalist (2022) database. Preliminary
floristic results were also partially published in
other works (Radchenko et al., 2019; Burda &
Koniakin, 2018; Gubar & Koniakin, 2020, 2021)
that contain more detailed information on
the spontaneous distribution of invasive alien
plant species on this territory.
The systematic structure of the studied
flora was analyzed according to Tolmachev
(1974). The spectrum of geoelements of the
flora of the local landscape Feofaniya was
established according to Kleopov (1990) and
Zaverukha (1985). The chorological affiliation
of some alien species was specified following
Protopopova (1991). The habitat information of
the studied plant species was supplemented
according to Fedorov (1974–1987), Tzvelev
(1989–2004), and Komarov (1934–1964).
The biomorphological structure of the
studied flora was determined according to
principal works (Raunkiær, 1905; Serebraykov,
1952, 1962; Golubev, 1965). The ecological
and coenotic structure of the studied flora
is described following Didukh & Plyuta (1994)
concept. Latin names of higher taxonomic
ranks are given according to Mosyakin &
Fedoronchuk (1999), while the names of lower
taxa follow POWO (2022) and WFO (2022)
databases.
Results and discussion
Systematic structure
The flora of the local landscape Feofaniya
is represented by 650 species of vascular
plants belonging to 337 genera and 94
families (Appendix). It includes four clades:
Equisetophyta (1 family / 1 genus / 4
species), Polypodiophyta (4 / 5 / 7), Pinophyta
(1 / 1 / 1), and Magnoliophyta (88 / 330 / 638).
The main indicators of flora are: the ratio
between individual groups of vascular plants;
distribution of species between individual
taxa levels (i.e., orders, families, and genera);
quantitative composition of dominant families
and the ratio between the number of species
Plant Introduction • 93/94 49
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
in different families (Tolmachev, 1986). For the
studied flora, this ratio is 1 : 3.6 : 6.7, and the
average number of species in the genus is 1.9.
The most of systematic elements of the studied
flora belong to the Magnoliophyta (98.2 % of
the total number of species). From this number,
Liliopsida comprises 20.0 %, Magnoliopsida –
78.2 %. Beside this, Equisetophyta represents
0.6 %, Polypodiophyta – 1.1 %, and Pinophyta –
0.1 %, which is typical for the flora of Ukraine
in general.
It was found that the first two leading
families in the flora of the local landscape
Feofaniya are Asteraceae and Poaceae (Table 1).
These families are first leading in the flora
of Kyiv and Ukraine too (Protopopova, 1991;
Hrechyshkina, 2010). The third leading family
in the flora of the studied area is Lamiaceae,
which is unusual for the compared floras.
The strong presence of this family in the flora
of the local landscape Feofaniya is due to
the increased number of synanthropic plant
species in its composition. Fabaceae here
occupies a position lower than in the flora of
Ukraine but much higher than in the flora of
Kyiv. Rosaceae occupies the fifth position,
which is lower than in Kyiv and Ukrainian
floras. The distribution of other lower ranks
in the families’ spectrum was affected by the
increased presence of Lamiaceae and the
appearance of Cyperaceae among the leading
families. Cyperaceae appeared among the
leading families due to the predominance of
aboriginal plant species, which are mainly
distributed in small areas of wetlands in the
floodplain of the Vita stream.
In general, ten leading families comprise
over half of the species of studied flora, while
the top three families gather over a quarter of
the species (Table 1). The other 29 families are
represented mainly by a single species each.
The information about floristic features is
generally reflected in the composition of the
leading genera. However, for the flora of the
Figure 1. Main biotopes of the local landscape Feofaniya and surrounding areas. 1 – phanerophytic-
type biotopes (G); 2 – herb-gramineous, meso- and xerotic biotopes dominated by hemicryptophytes,
generated in conditions of moderate or insufficient moisture (meadows, steppes) (E); 3 – biotopes
produced in a result of human economic activity (fallows) (I); 4 – the same (park and garden biotopes)
(I); 5 – overwetted gramineous-type biotopes, wetland and coastal-aquatic vegetation (D); 6 – biotopes of
continental reservoirs (C).
50 Plant Introduction • 93/94
S. Koniakin, L. Gubar
local landscape Feofaniya, it is not indicative
because most genera are represented by
one or two species only. The typical boreal
genus Carex L. (13 species or 2.0 % of the
total number of species), and the typical
Mediterranean genera Veronica L. (13 species
or 2.0 %) and Trifolium L. (10 species or 1.5 %)
have the largest species diversity in the local
landscape Feofaniya.
Geographical structure
Four types of regional distribution areas,
including 15 classes and 13 groups, have been
established in the flora of the local landscape
Feofaniya (Table 2). Holarctic type occupies
a leading position and is represented by 518
species, which corresponds to 79.6 % of the
total number of species in the study area. This
type consists of five classes, among which the
Eurasian class predominates. The Holarctic
class occupies the second position, which
is typical both for the studied flora and the
region’s flora in general. Cosmopolitan type is
the second by the number of gathered species
(Table 2). It combines two classes, among
which the cosmopolitan class is the most
abundant. This type is represented by species
of synanthropic and adventitious factions. This
is associated with their invasion in the region
and their ability to effectively adapt to the new
environmental conditions. The transitional
type is enhanced exclusively by alien species
and represented by seven species only. The
Mediterranean type occupies the lowest
position in the spectrum of geographical
structure and is represented by two species
only.
Biomorphological structure
In the spectrum of biomorphs in the studied
flora, gramineous polycarpic plants (359
species or 55.2 % of the total species number)
and gramineous monocarpic plants (196
species or 30.2 %) predominate. The share of
woody representatives (trees and shrubs) is
much smaller – they are represented by 95
species (14.6 %) only. The trees are represented
by 51 species (7.8 %), shrubs – by 36 species
(5.5 %) species, semi-shrubs – by seven species
(1.2 %), and small shrubs – by a single species
(0.1 %).
Analysis of life forms (Fig. 2) showed a
predominance of hemicryptophytes (60.6 %).
This indicates the approach of the studied
flora to the temperate holarctic type, which
fully corresponds to its geographical location.
Due to the increased presence of alien plant
species, which are distributed mainly in the
affected areas, therophytes occupy the second
position (24.6 %). Considering that the local
Nr Flora of the local landscape Feofaniya Kyiv flora Ukrainian flora
Families Number of species / % Families Families
1 Asteraceae 71 / 10.9 Asteraceae Asteraceae
2 Poaceae 58 / 8.9 Poaceae Poaceae
3 Lamiaceae 45 / 6.9 Cyperaceae Fabaceae
4 Fabaceae 38 / 5.8 Rosacea Rosacea
5 Rosacea 32 / 4.9 Caryophyllaceae Lamiaceae
6 Brassicaceae 27 / 4.2 Lamiaceae Caryophyllaceae
7 Caryophyllaceae 25 / 3.8 Fabaceae Ranunculaceae
8 Apiaceae 24 / 3.7 Scrophulariaceae Apiaceae
9 Ranunculaceae 17 / 2.6 Apiaceae Brassicaceae
10 Cyperaceae 16 / 2.5 Ranunculaceae Cyperaceae
Totally in the top three families 174 / 26.7
Totally in the top ten families 353 / 54.3
Table 1. The spectrum of the leading families in the flora of the local landscape Feofaniya compared with
floras of Kyiv and Ukraine (Protopopova, 1991; Hrechyshkina, 2010).
Plant Introduction • 93/94 51
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
landscape Feofaniya is a forest park object, this
resulted in 12.8 % of phanerophytes presence.
Chamephytes are represented only by ten
species (1.5 %); among them, one species is
a nanophanerophyte (0.1 %), and two are
geophytes (0.4 %).
One of the main features of the
biomorphological structure of the studied
flora is the periodicity of vegetation. According
to this indicator, summer-green plants
predominate in the flora of the local landscape
Feofaniya and are represented by 621 species
(95.5 %). All other groups, i.e., summer/winter-
green plants (7 species or 1.1 %), winter-green
(11 species or 1.7 %), ephemeroids (8 species or
1.2 %) and ephemers (3 species or 0.5 %) – are
represented by significantly lower number of
species.
The rosellate, semi-rosellate and non-
rosellate plants were distinguished among
the studied species. According to this feature,
non-rosellate plants predominate in the
studied flora and are represented by 430
species (66.2 %). There are 198 species (30.5 %)
of semi-rosellate plants. Rosellate plants have
the smallest representation – 22 species make
only 3.3 % of the total number.
In the flora of the local landscape Feofaniya,
the predominance of species with a tap root
system (318 species or 48.9 %) was noted.
Species with fibrous (270 species or 41.5 %) and
tap-fibrous (59 species or 9.1 %) root systems
are less abundant. Plants without root system
are represented by three species only (i.e.,
Cuscuta europaea L., Lathraea squamaria L.,
and Viscum album L.), which make 0.5 % of the
total number of species. An increase in the
proportion of species with a tap root system is
observed in anthropogenic flora (Protopopova,
1991; Zavyalova, 2010), and confirmed by the
results of a present analysis.
A characteristic feature of the studied flora
is a high rate of non-rhizomatous species
(206 species or 31.7 %). Short-rhizomatous
(177 species or 27.2 %) and long-rhizomatous
(107 species or 16.5 %) plant species are also
well represented in the studied flora. This is
due to the preservation of certain inaccessible
natural biotopes that are not recreationally
affected. The group of caudex plants (139
species or 21.3 %) has also a high presence
rate. The plants with tuberous (14 species or
2.2 %) and bulbous (7 species or 1.1 %) structure
of underground shoots are the least abundant.
Distribution areas types and classes Number of
species / %
І. HOLARCTIC TYPE 518 / 79.6
1. Holarctic class 191 / 29.3
2. North American class 3 / 0.5
3. Eurasian class 300 / 46.1
4. European class 21 / 3.2
5. Circumboreal class 3 / 0.5
ІІ. MEDITERRANEAN TYPE 2 / 0.3
1. Mediterranean class 2 / 0.3
ІІІ. TRANSITIONAL TYPE 7 / 1.1
1. European-North American class 1 / 0.2
2. European–Mediterranean–North
American class
1 / 0.2
3. European–Eastern Asian–North
American class
1 / 0.2
4. European–Asian-North American
class
1 / 0.2
5. European–Mediterranean–Eastern
Asian–North American class
1 / 0.2
6. European–American class 1 / 0.2
7. Western Palearctic–South American
class
1 / 0.2
ІV. COSMOPOLITAN TYPE 123 / 18.9
1. Cosmopolitan class 100 / 15.3
2. Hemicosmopolitan class 23 / 3.5
Table 2. The geographical structure of the flora of
the local landscape Feofaniya.
Ecological structure
In the ecological spectrum regarding soil
moisture, the mesophilic group of plants is
the most numerous and represented by 77.3 %
of species. This group is subdivided onto
eumesophilic (46.0 %), xeromesophilic (28.0 %)
and hygromesophilic (3.4 %) subgroups. The
second position is occupied by the group of
hygrophilous plants, which comprise 11.8 %.
The group of hygrophilous plants is subdivided
onto euhygrophilic (7.4 %) and mesohygrophilic
(4.5 %) subgroups. The xerophilic group is
much smaller – it represents 8.3 % of the
total number of species only. Consequently,
the xerophilic group is subdivided into
euxerophilic (2.1 %) and mesoxerophilic (6.2 %)
subgroups. The hydrophilic group is the least
52 Plant Introduction • 93/94
S. Koniakin, L. Gubar
numerous and represents 1.8 % of the total
number of species (Fig. 3 A).
According to the heliomorphs, the studied
plants are distributed among four groups:
heliophytes, sciophytes, heliosciophytes, and
sciogeliophytes. Heliophytes predominate
and are represented by 51.4 % of plant
species. Sciogeliophytes occupy the next
position with 33.7 % of the total number of
species. Heliosciophytes and sciophytes are
represented by 10.4 % and 4.5 %, respectively
(Fig. 3 B).
Ecological-coenotic analysis
The species of synanthropic groups prevail
in the eco-coenotic spectrum of the flora
of the local landscape Feofaniya. There are
32.6 % of synanthropic plant species (e.g., Acer
negundo L., Asclepias syriaca L., and Bromus
tectorum L.), which are pretty abundant due
to anthropogenic load and invasion. In the
local landscape Feofaniya, forest species (e.g.,
Carpinus betulus L., Lathyrus vernus (L.) Bernh.,
and Paris quadrifolia L.) represent 27.8 %, and
meadow species (e.g., Dianthus deltoides L.,
Scabiosa ochroleuca L., and Silene flos-cuculi
(L.) Greuter et Burdet) represent 23.8 %.
Significantly less common are representatives
of coastal-water (4.2 %; e.g., Alisma plantago-
aquatica L., Butomus umbellatus L., and
Cyperus fuscus L.), wetland (3.4 %; e.g.,
Carex acuta L., Juncus conglomeratus L., and
Alopecurus arundinaceus Poir.), coastal (2.5 %;
e.g., Angelica archangelica L., Eupatorium
cannabinum L., and Echinocystis lobata (Michx.)
Torr. et A. Gray), steppic (2.5 %; e.g., Festuca
valesiaca Schleich. ex Gaudin, Eryngium
campestre L., and Artemisia austriaca Jacq.),
sandy (1.8 %; e.g., Artemisia campestris L.,
Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench, and
Pilosella officinarum Vaill.), and aquatic
(1.4 %; e.g., Lemna minor L., Myriophyllum
spicatum L., and Potamogeton nodosus Poir.)
communities (Fig. 4).
The alien fraction of the studied flora
includes 181 species of vascular plants
belonging to 131 genera and 51 families, which
makes 28.0 % of the total number of species in
the studied area (Appendix). In general, in the
flora of Ukraine, the alien fraction comprises
only 16.0 % (Protopopova, 1991). The division
of alien plant species into groups is based
on the time of their entry into certain flora
(Protopopova, 1988). Hence, the alien fraction
of the studied flora is dominated by kenophytes
– 111 species (60.9 %) and archaeophytes – 70
species (39.1 %).
According to the degree of naturalization,
alien plant species of the studied flora
are divided into five groups. Epecophytes
are presented by the largest number of
species according to the degree of their
naturalization. They are represented by 90
species and comprise 50.0 % of the total
number of species of the foreign faction of the
studied flora. The second position occupies
ergasiophytes, represented by 60 species
(33.0 %). Agrioecophytes include 14 species
(7.7 %). Agriophytes and ephemerophytes are
Figure 2. Distribution of the life forms in the flora of the local landscape Feofaniya.
Plant Introduction • 93/94 53
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
B
A
Figure 3. Hygromorphs (A) and heliomorphs (B) in the flora of the local landscape Feofaniya.
represented by ten (5.5 %) and seven (3.8 %)
species, respectively.
Analysis of initial distribution areas of
the alien species represented in the flora of
the local landscape Feofaniya showed the
predominance of North American (39 species
or 21.4 %), Mediterranean (37 species or
20.3 %), and Mediterranean-Iranian-Turanian
(20 species or 11.0 %) origin. The species
of Asian (16 species or 8.8 %) and Iranian-
Turanian (12 species or 6.6 %) origin are much
less abundant. All other groups include from
one to five species and, in total, joint 58 species
(31.9 %).
Significant synanthropization of the local
landscape Feofaniya located on the outskirts
of Kyiv and borders of Holosiivskyi National
Nature Park was detected. Escaped plants
(ergasiophytes) and the economic activity
of St. Panteleimon’s monastery and the
Park Feofaniya (ornamental horticulture)
contributed to the synanthropization of the
flora. The entry of ergasiophytes is realized
from adjacent territories, including the
archeological Monument of the National
Importance Khotiv Hillfort, Holosiivskyi
National Nature Park, the National Complex
Expocenter of Ukraine, and the National
Museum of Folk Architecture and Life of
Ukraine Khotiv Village. Despite the high level
of synanthropization in the studied area, the
presence of two species listed in the Red Book
of Ukraine (i.e., Lilium martagon L. and Neottia
nidus-avis (L.) Rich.; Didukh, 2009) and nine
regionally rare for Kyiv city and Kyiv region
plant species have been confirmed (Appendix).
54 Plant Introduction • 93/94
S. Koniakin, L. Gubar
Figure 4. Ecological and coenotic spectrum in the flora of the local landscape Feofaniya.
In general, a comprehensive analysis of the
studied flora revealed that it belongs to the
flora of broad-leaved forests. Minor deviations
in flora’s spectra are associated with an
increased presence of alien plant species.
We compared the data on the flora of the
local landscape Feofaniya with similar studies
implemented in 2019–2021 by the prominent
introductory botanical institutions of the
Right Bank Forest-Steppe. Thus, the largest
floristic diversity (830 plant species) was
recorded in the Dendrological Park Alexandria
(Shynder & Doiko, 2020). Over 700 species
of wildly growing plants were reported
from the M.M. Gryshko National Botanical
Garden (Shynder, 2021). The vegetation
structure of the O.V. Fomin Botanical Garden
is represented by 524 taxa (Kolomiychuk &
Shynder, 2022). Instead, the smallest diversity
of plants was recorded for the spontaneous
flora of the Dendrological Park Sofiyivka – 443
species (Chorna et al., 2021). Considering the
species composition, it was found that the
flora of the local landscape Feofaniya occupies
an intermediate position by quantitative
characteristics and taxonomically it is the most
similar to the Dendrological Park Alexandria,
which tends to more forested regions of the
Forest-Steppe of Ukraine.
It should be noted that the presence of
alien species in the local landscape Feofaniya
is relatively low (only 27.8 %). For comparison,
in the M.M. Gryshko National Botanical
Garden, alien species comprise 41.9 %, in
the Dendrological Park Alexandria and
Dendrological Park Sofiyivka – 31.2 % and
25.5 %, respectively (Shynder & Doiko, 2020;
Shynder, 2021; Chorna et al., 2021). Thus, the
vegetation of the local landscape Feofaniya is
less transformed among mentioned areas.
Conclusions
It was found that the spontaneous flora of
the local landscape Feofaniya is represented
by 650 species of vascular plants belonging
to 337 genera and 94 families. The analysis of
the systematic structure of the studied flora
revealed that it is similar to the flora of broad-
leaved forests. Although at the same time,
there is a shift in its systematic structure due
to anthropogenic impact and the formation of
new ecotopes due to the transformation of soil
and vegetation. The geographical structure
of the studied flora has dominated species of
the holarctic type (518 species), most of which
belong to the Eurasian class (300 species)
and cosmopolitan type (123 species), which is
characteristic of the broad-leaved forests.
The dominance of gramineous (85.3 %),
hemicryptophytes (60.6 %), tap-root (48.9 %),
nonrosellate (66.1 %), summer-green
(95.5 %) and rhizome-free (31.7 %) plants was
established.
In general, the studied flora has prevailing
mesophilic-hygromesophilic features. The
diversity of plant ecological groups has
resulted from a significant concentration of
semi-natural types of biotopes. According to
Plant Introduction • 93/94 55
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
the results of the analysis of the naturalization
of alien plant species, the predominance of
kenophytes (111 species), epecophytes (90
species), and species of North American origin
(40 species) have been determined.
Acknowledgements
The work contains the results of the scientific
project “Population ecology and patterns of
distribution of invasive species of biota on
the territory of Ukraine” (state registration
number 0120U102580), which is supported by
the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
The authors are sincerely thankful to Raisa
Burda for consultations. We are grateful to the
anonymous reviewers for correctly expressed
essential remarks and helpful advice in article
preparation.
References
Alokhin O. O., Andreychuk V. M., & Konischuk V. V.
(2009). Natural reserve fund of Ukraine: territories
and objects of national importance. Center for
Environmental Education and Information. (In
Ukrainian)
Barshchevska, N. M., & Tyutyunnyk, Y. H.
(2014). Landscape diversities of the park
zone territories in Kyiv (the example of the
Reservation Park “Feofaniya”). Physical Geography
and Geomorphology, 3(75), 70–74. (In Ukrainian)
Bayrak, O. M., & Hrytsay I. A. (2009). Ephemeroides:
natural and cultivated populations. Living Ukraine,
1–2, 7. (In Ukrainian)
Berezina, V. I., Gubar, L. M., Menshova, L. M., &
Peregrym, M. M. (2007). Preliminary list of wild
species of vascular plants of the acad. О. V. Fomin
Botanical Garden. In Acad. О. V. Fomin Botanical
Garden. Catalog of plants. Nature reserves of Ukraine.
Flora. Issue 7 (pp. 292–315). Phytosociocenter.
(In Ukrainian)
Burda, R. I. (2012). Weediness of Kyiv city forests.
In Weeds, features of their biology and control
systems in agricultural crops (pp. 44–50). Koloobih.
(In Ukrainian)
Burda, R. I. (Ed.). (2018). Adaptive strategy populations
of alien species. Naukova Dumka. (In Ukrainian)
Burda, R. I., & Koniakin, S. N. (2018). Spontaneous
dispersion of species of the genus Juglans L. in
the forests and parks of Kyiv. Russian Journal
of Biological Invasions, 9(1), 95–107. https://doi.
org/10.1134/S2075111718020029
Chorna, G. A., Shynder, O. I., & Kostruba, T. M.
(2021). Addition to the list of species of
spontaneous flora of the National Dendrological
Park “Sofiyivka” of the National Academy of
Sciences of Ukraine (Uman, Cherkasy region).
Chornomors’kyi Botanical Jornal, 17(4), 302–
315. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32999/
ksu1990-553X/2021-17-4-1
Davydov, D. A., & Gomlya, L. M. (2021). Vascular
plants of Poltava town territorial commune:
an annotat-ed checklist. Biology and Ecology,
7(1), 70–81. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.
org/10.33989/2021.7.1.243453
Didukh, Y. P. (Ed.). (2009). Red book of Ukraine. Plants.
Globalconsulting. (In Ukrainian)
Didukh, Y. P., & Plyuta, P. G. (1994). Phytoindication of
ecological factors. Naukova Dumka. (In Ukrainian)
Fedorov, A. A. (Ed.). (1974–1987). Flora of the European
part of USSR. Vols. 1–6. Nauka. (In Russian)
Golivets, M. O. (2014a). Adaptive strategy of
Impatiens parviflora (Balsaminaceae) in the
secondary range. I. Patterns of population
organization along the environmental gradient.
Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 71(2), 161–171.
(In Ukrainian)
Golivets, M. O. (2014b). Adaptive strategy of
Impatiens parviflora (Balsaminaceae) in the
secondary range. II. Vitality structure of
populations and ontogenetic strategy of the
species. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 71(3), 317–
323. (In Ukrainian)
Golubev, V. N. (1965). Ecological and biological
characteristics of herbaceous plants and forest-
steppe plant communities. Nauka. (In Russian)
Goncharenko, I. V., Ignatiuk, O. A., & Shelyag-
Sosonko, Y. R. (2013). Forest vegetation
of Feofania tract and its anthropogenic
transformation. Ecology and Noospherology, 24(3–
4), 51–63. (In Ukrainian)
Gubar, L. M., & Koniakin, S. N. (2020). Invasive
alien species of plants of the local landscape
Feofaniya. Environmental Sciences, 4(31), 167–173.
(In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-
9716/2020.eco.4-31.26
Gubar, L. M., & Koniakin, S. N. (2021). Invasive
alien species of plants of the archeological
monument of national importance “Khotiv
Hillfort”. In O. P. Dmytriev (Ed.), Botany and
mycology: modern horizons (pp. 329–340). Nash
Format. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15407/
grodzinsky2021
Hrechyshkina, Y. V. (2010). The natural flora of
vascular plants of Kyiv [PhD thesis abstract,
M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National
Academy of Sciences of Ukraine]. (In Ukrainian)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075111718020029
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075111718020029
https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu1990-553X/2021-17-4-1
https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu1990-553X/2021-17-4-1
https://doi.org/10.33989/2021.7.1.243453
https://doi.org/10.33989/2021.7.1.243453
https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.4-31.26
https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.4-31.26
https://doi.org/10.15407/grodzinsky2021
https://doi.org/10.15407/grodzinsky2021
56 Plant Introduction • 93/94
S. Koniakin, L. Gubar
Hryn, F. O., & Bradis, E. M. (1971). Vegetation of the
UkrSSR. Forests. Naukova Dumka. (In Ukrainian)
iNaturalist. (2022, April 1). https://www.inaturalist.org
Kleopov, Y. D. (1990). Analysis of the flora of deciduous
forests of the European part of USSR. Naukova
Dumka. (In Russian)
Klimenko, Y. O., Moroz, V. V., & Drujina, M. M.
(2014). State of the age-old Querceta roboris
plantation in Feofania park, Kyiv city (on the
example of the 3rd, 5th and 6th quarters). Plant
Introduction, 62, 32–42. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.
org/10.5281/zenodo.1494306
Kolomiychuk, V., & Shynder, O. (2022). Addition
to the spontaneous flora of O.V. Fomin
Botanical Garden (Kyiv). Bulletin of Taras
Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series
Biology, 87(4), 18–26. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.
org/10.17721/1728.2748.2021.87.18-26
Komarov, V. L. (Ed.) (1934–1964). Flora of USSR.
Vols. 1–29. Publishing house of the Academy of
Sciences of USSR. (In Russian)
Kuzemko, A., Kutsokon, Y., & Vasyliuk, O. (Eds.).
(2021). Biodiversity of Rzhyshchiv city amalgamated
territorial community. Druk Art. (In Ukrainian)
Lubchenko, V. M. (1983). Broad-leaved forests with
Carpinus betulus L. near the city of Kyiv. Ukrainian
Botanical Journal, 11(1), 30–34. (In Ukrainian)
Marynych, O. M., Parkhomenko, H. O.,
Pashchenko, V. M., Petrenko, O. M., &
Shyshchenko, P. H. (2003). Physical-geographical
zoning of Ukraine. Scale 1 : 4000 000. Ukrainian
Geographical Journal, 1, 16–22. (In Ukrainian)
Matiashuk, R. K., Nebesnyi, V. B., Koniakin, S. M.,
Tkachenko, I. V., & Prokopuk, Y. S. (2014).
Senturiesold “Feofaniya” oaks – region wildlife
monuments. Scientific Reports of National University
of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 6,
1–11. (In Ukrainian). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/
Nd_2014_6_18
Mosyakin S., & Fedoronchuk M. (1999). Vascular plants
of Ukraine: a nomenclatural checklist. M.G. Kholodny
Institute of Botany of the NAS of Ukraine.
Padun, I. M. (1985). The current state of vegetation
of the “Feofania” tract. Ukrainian Botanical Journal,
42(2), 17–20. (In Ukrainian)
Pashkevych, N. A. (2015). The evaluation of
adaptation of Eragrostis minor Host (Poaceae)
coenopopulations to the conditions
of transformed environment. Modern
Phytomorphology, 7, 103–112. (In Ukrainian).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.160374
Pashkevych, N. A. (2020). The biotopes of the
park-monuments of the garden art Feophania.
Environmental Sciences, 1(28), 263–268. https://
doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.1-28.41
Pashkevych, N. A., & Bereznichenko, Y. G. (2016).
Population analysis of Anthriscus sylvestris
(Apiaceae) under environmental conditions
of the Forest Zone. Ukrainian Botanical Journal,
73(5), 474–482. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.
org/10.15407/ukrbotj73.05.474
Povarnitsyn, V. A., & Shendrikov, M. I. (1957). Types
of forest of the Academy of Sciences Research
Forestry of the Ukrainian SSR “Feofania”. Ukrainian
Botanical Journal, 14(1), 75–85. (In Ukrainian).
POWO. (2022, April 1). Plant of the World Online.
http://powo.science.kew.org/
Prokopuk Y. S., Koniakin S. N., & Netsvetov M. V.
(2020). Climate variables governing the growth
of Tilia cordata (Malvaceae s. l. / Tiliaceae s. str.)
in forest biotope in Kyiv. Ukrainian Botanical
Journal, 77(4), 294–304. (In Ukrainian). https://
doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj77.04.294
Prokopuk, Y. S., & Krylov, Y. I. (2018). Condition,
protection and maintenance of age-old
pedunculate oak trees in Feofania forest. Ecology
and Noospherology, 29(1), 36–41. (In Ukrainian).
https://doi.org/10.15421/031806
Prokopuk, Y. S., & Netsvetov, M. V. (2020, October
21–22). Age and radial growth of Pinus sylvestris L.
ornamental trees in Feofania park. In Proceedings
of the First International Scientific Conference “Priority
directions of use of Gymnospermae in modern
conditions” (pp. 130–132). Olexandria State
Dendrological Park, NAS of Ukraine. (In Ukrainian)
Protopopova, V. V. (1988). Naturalization of
adventive plants of Ukraine. Ukrainian Botanical
Journal, 45(4), 10–15. (In Ukrainian)
Protopopova, V. V. (1991). The synanthropic flora
of Ukraine and its development. Naukova Dumka.
(In Russian)
Radchenko, V. G., & Bayrak, O. M. (2009). Park-
monument of landscape architecture “Feofania”:
history, social and ecological role, ways to
protect. Living Ukraine, 1–2, 2–4. (In Ukrainian)
Radchenko, V. G., Burda, R. I., Pashkevych, N. A.,
Koniakin, S. N., Krakhmalnyi, О. F., Gaponova, L. P.,
Matiashuk, R. K., Shupova, T. V., & Dubrovsky,
Y. V. (2019). Park-monument of landscape art
Feofania – a refugium of the biotic diversity
of the urban ecosystem of Kyiv. Environmental
Sciences, 2(25), 138–146. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.
org/10.32846/2306-9716-2019-2-25-22
Rai, P. K., & Sing, J. S. (2020). Invasive alien plant species:
Their impact on environment, ecosystemservices
and human health. Ecological Indicators, 111, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106020
Raunkiær, C. (1905). Types biologiques pour
la geographie botanique. Kongelige Danske
Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger, 5, 347–438.
https://www.inaturalist.org
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1494306
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1494306
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728.2748.2021.87.18-26
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728.2748.2021.87.18-26
http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nd_2014_6_18
http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nd_2014_6_18
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.160374
https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.1-28.41
https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.1-28.41
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj73.05.474
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj73.05.474
http://powo.science.kew.org/
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj77.04.294
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj77.04.294
https://doi.org/10.15421/031806
https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716-2019-2-25-22
https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716-2019-2-25-22
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106020
Plant Introduction • 93/94 57
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
Serebryakov, I. G. (1952). Morphology of vegetative organs
of higher plants. Sovetskaya Nauka. (In Russian)
Serebryakov, I. G. (1962). Ecological morphology of
the plants. Vysshaya Shkola. (In Russian)
Shelyag-Sosonko, Y. R., Bayrak, O. M., &
Vorobyov, Y. V. (2009). Phytodiversity of the
natural boundary Feofaniya study history,
floristic and coenotic peculiarities. Living Ukraine,
1–2, 5–7. (In Ukrainian)
Shynder, O. I., & Doiko, N. M. (2020). Spontaneous
flora of the State Dendrological Park “Alexandria”
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. In
Actual problems of natural sciences: modern scientific
discussions (pp. 420–460). Baltija Publishing.
(In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.30525/978-
9934-26-025-4-20
Shynder, O. I. (2021, October 5–9). New
information about the flora of the M.M. Gryshko
National Botanical Garden NAS of Ukraine.
Global consequences of plant introduction in
the conditions of climate change. In Proceedings
of the international scientific conference “Global
consequences of plant introduction in the conditions
of climate change” (pp. 62–65). (In Ukrainian)
Shynder, O., & Negrash, J. (2021). Checklist of the
flora of the vicinity of Balakliya (Kharkiv region,
Ukraine): native and alien taxa, distribution of
rare plants, new findings. Plant Introduction, 89/90,
13–71. https://doi.org/10.46341/PI2020043
Tolmachev, A. I. (1974). Introduction to plant
geography. Publishing House of Leningrad State
University. (In Russian)
Tolmachev, A. I. (1986). Methods of comparative
floristry and the problem of florogenesis. Nauka. (In
Russian)
Tzvelev, N. N. (Ed.). (1989–2004). Flora of the
European part of USSR (Flora of the Eastern Europe).
Vols. 7–11. Various Publishers [Nauka, Mir i
Sem’ya, KMK]. (In Russian)
WFO. (2022, April 1). World Flora Online. http://
www.worldfloraonline.org
Zaverukha, B. V. (1985). Flora of Volhyn-Podolia and
its genesis. Naukova Dumka. (In Russian)
Zavyalova, L. V. (2010). A checklist of the Chernihiv
urban flora. Phytosociocenter. (In Ukrainian)
Appendix. An annotated checklist of spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv city, Ukraine).
Legend:
* – alien (non-native) plant species;
" – cultural plant species;
' – rare and endangered plant species;
¡ – unconfirmed plant species.
EQUISETOPHYTA
Equisetaceae: Equisetum arvense L., E. hyemale L., E. pratense Ehrh., E. sylvaticum L.
POLYPODIOPHYTA
Dennstaedtiaceae: Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn.
Dryopteridaceae: Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H.P. Fuchs, D. dilatata (Hoffm.) A. Gray, D. filix-mas (L.) Schott.
Athyriaceae: Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth.
Cystopteridaceae: Cystopteris fragilis (L.), ′Gymnocarpium dryopteris (L.) Newman.
PINOPHYTA
Pinaceae: Pinus sylvestris L.
MAGNOLIOPHYTA
LiLiopsida
Alismataceae: Alisma plantago-aquatica L.
Amaryllidaceae: Allium angulosum L., A. oleraceum L., A. rotundum L., ′,″A. ursinum L., ′,″Galanthus nivalis L., ′,″G. plicatus
M. Bieb.
Araceae: Lemna minor L.
Asparagaceae: Asparagus officinalis L.
Butomaceae: Butomus umbellatus L.
https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-025-4-20
https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-025-4-20
https://doi.org/10.46341/PI2020043
http://www.worldfloraonline.org
http://www.worldfloraonline.org
58 Plant Introduction • 93/94
S. Koniakin, L. Gubar
Convallariaceae: ′Convallaria majalis L., Maianthemum bifolium (L.) F.W. Schmidt, Polygonatum multiflorum (L.) All.,
P. odoratum (Mill.) Druce
Haloragaceae: Myriophyllum spicatum L.
Hyacinthaceae: ″Muscari neglectum L., ′Scilla bifolia L., ′,″S. siberica Haw.
Cyperaceae: Carex acuta L., C. acutiformis Ehrh., C. digitatа L., C. hirta L., C. michelii Host., C. pallescens L., C. pilosa
Scop., C. praecox Schreb., C. pseudocyperus DC., C. remota L., C. spicata Huds., C. sylvatica Huds., C. vesicaria L.,
Cyperus fuscus L., Eleocharis palustris (L.) Roem. et Schult., Scirpus sylvaticus L.
Iridaceae: ′,″Crocus heuffelianus Herb., Iris pseudacorus L.
Juncaceae: Juncus articulatus L., J. bufonius L., J. compressus Jacq., J. conglomeratus L., J. effussus L., J. inflexus L., Luzula
campestris (L.) DC., L. pallescens Sw.
Liliaceae: ′,″Erythronium dens-canis L., Gagea lutea (L.) Ker Gawl., G. minima (L.) Ker Gawl., ′G. paczoskii (Zapal.)
Grossh., ′Lilium martagon L.
Orchidaceae: ′Cephalanthera longifolia (L.) Fritsch, ′Neottia nidus-avis (L.) Rich.
Poaceae: Agropyron cristatum (L.) P. Gaertn., Agrostis capillaris L., A. gigantea Roth., A. stolonifera L., Alopecurus
arundinaceus Poir., A. pratensis L., *Apera spica-venti (L.) P. Beauv., Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) J. Presl et C. Presl, *Avena
sativa L., Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng, Brachypodium sylvaticum (Huds.) P. Beauv., *Bromus arvensis L., B. benekenii
(Lange) Trimen, *B. carinatus Hook. et Arn., B. hordeaceum L., B. inermis Leyss., B. japonicus Thunb., *B. sterilis L.,
*B. tectorum L., Calamagrostis canescens (Weber) Roth., C. epigeios (L.) Roth, Dactylis glomerata L., Deschampsia
caespitosa (L.) P. Beauv., *Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) Muehl., *D. sanguinalis (L.) Scop., *Echinochloa crus-galli (L.)
P. Beauv., Elytrigia intermedia (Host) Nevski, E. repens (L.) Nevski, E. trichophora (Link) Nevski, *Eragrostis minor Host.,
*E. pectinacea (Michx.) Nees., *E. pilosa (L.) P. Beauv., Festuca valesiaca Schleich. ex Gaudin, Glyceria fluitans (L.) R. Br.,
*Hordeum murinum L., Koeleria macrantha (Ledeb.) Schult., Lolium giganteum (L.) Darbysh., *L. murtiflorum Lam.,
L. perenne L., L. pratense (Huds.) Darbysh., Melica nutans L., ¡M. picta K. Koch., Milium effusum L., Molinia caerulea (L.)
Moench, Phleum pratense L., Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., Poa angustifolia L., P. annua L., P. bulbosa L.,
P. compressa L., P. nemoralis L., P. pratensis L., P. trivialis L., *Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. et Schult., *S. verticillata (L.)
P. Beauv., *S. viridis (L.) P. Beauv., *Triticum aestivum L., Vulpia myuros (L.) C.C. Gmel.
Potamogetonaceae: Potamogeton crispus L., P. natans L., P. nodosus Poir., P. perfoliatus L., Stuckenia pectinata (L.)
Börner
Sparganiaceae: Sparganium erectum L.
Trilliaceae: Paris quadrifolia L.
Typhaceae: Typha angustifolia L., T. latifolia L.
MagnoLiopsida
Aceraceae: Acer campestre L., *A. negundo L., A. platanoides L., *A. pseudoplatanus L., *A. saccharinum L., A. tataricum L.
Adoxaceae: Adoxa moschatellina L.
Amaranthaceae: *Amaranthus albus L., *A. caudatus L., *A. retroflexus L.
Apiaceae: Aegopodium podagraria L., Angelica archangelica L., Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm., Berula erecta (Huds.)
Coville, Chaerophyllum aromaticum L., C. temulum L., *Conium maculatum L., Daucus carota L., Eryngium campestre L.,
E. planum L., Falcaria vulgaris Bernh., Heracleum sibiricum L., *H. sosnowskyi Manden., *H. mantegazzianum Sommier
et Levier, Oenanthe aquatica (L.) Poir., Ostericum palustre (Besser) Besser, Pastinaca sativa L., Peucedanum palustre (L.)
Moench, Pimpinella saxifraga L., Sanicula europaea L., Sium latifolium L., ¡S. sisarum L., ¡,*Torilis arvensis (Huds.) Link,
T. japonica (Houtt.) DC.
Apocynaceae: *Vinca minor L.
Aristolochiaceae: Aristolochia clematitis L., Asarum europaeum L.
Asclepiadaceae: *Asclepias syriaca L.
Asteraceae: Achillea collina (Becker ex Rchb. f.) Heimerl, A. inundata Kondr., A. millefolium L., *Ambrosia
artemisiifolia L., Arctium lappa L., A. minus (Hill.) Bern., A. tomentosum Mill. *Artemisia absinthium L., A. austriaca
Jacq., A. campestris L., A. marschalliana Spreng., A. vulgaris L., Bellis perennis L., *Bidens frondosa L., *Сalendula
officinalis (L.) Nees, Carduus crispus L., Carlina biebersteinii Bernh. ex Hornem., *Centaurea cyanus L., C. jacea L.,
C. stoebe L., Chondrilla juncea L., *Cichorium intybus L., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., C. oleraceum (L.) Scop., C. palustre
(L.) Scop., C. vulgare (Savi) Ten., *Coreopsis auriculata L., *Cosmos bipinnatus Cav., Crepis tectorum L., *Cyclachaena
xanthiifolia (Nutt.) Fresen., Erigeron acris L., *E. annuus (L.) Pers., *E. canadensis L., *E. strigosus Muhl. ex Willd.,
Eupatorium cannabinum L., *Galinsoga parviflora Cav., *Helianthus tuberosus L., Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench.,
Hypochaeris radicata L., Inula britannica L., ′I. helenium L., Jacobaea vulgaris Gaertn., Lactuca muralis (L.) Fresen
(Mycelis muralis (L.) Dumort.), *L. serriola L., L. tatarica (L.) C.A. Mey., Lapsana communis L., *Matricaria discoidea
DC., *Onopordon acanthium L., Picris hieracioides L., Pilosella officinarum Vaill. (Hieracium pilosella L.), P. cymosa (L.)
F.W. Schultz et Sch. Bip., *Psephellus dealbatus (Willd.) K. Koch, Senecio vernalis Waldst., *S. vulgaris L., *Solidago
canadensis L., *S. gigantea Aiton., S. virgaurea L., *Sonchus arvensis L., *S. asper (L.) Hill, *S. oleraceus L., S. palustris L.,
*Symphyotrichum × salignum (Willd.) G.L. Nesom, *S. novi-belgii (L.) G.L. Nesom, *S. × versicolor (Willd.) G.L. Nesom,
*Tagetes patula L., Tanacetum vulgare L., Taraxacum officinale F. H. Wigg., Tragopogon dubius subsp. major (Jacq.)
Plant Introduction • 93/94 59
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
Vollm., *Tripleurospermum inodorum (C. Koch.) Schultz Bip., Tussilago farfara L., *Xanthium albinum (Widd.) H. Scholz
Balsaminaceae: Impatiens noli-tangere L., *I. parviflora DC.
Berberidaceae: *Berberis aquifolium Pursh, *B. vulgaris L., ′,″Gymnospermium odessanum (DC.) Takht.
Betulaceae: Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., Betula pendula Roth.
Bignoniaceae: *Catalpa bignonioides Walter
Boraginaceae: Anchusa arvensis (L.) M. Bieb., *A. officinalis L., Asperugo procumbens L., *Buglossoides arvensis (L.)
I.M. Johnst., *Cynoglossum officinale L., Echium vulgare L., *Lappula squarrosa (Retz.) Dumort., ¡Lithospermum
officinale L., *Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill., M. micrantha Pall.ex Lehm., M. sparsiflora J.C. Mikan ex Pohl, Nonea pulla (L.)
DC., Pulmonaria obscura Dumort., Symphytum asperum Lepech., S. officinale L.
Brassicaceae: Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara et Granda, *Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., *Armoracia rusticana
P. Gaertn., B. Mey. et Scherb., Barbarea vulgaris R. Br., Berteroa incana (L.) DC., *Brassica napus L., *Capsella bursa-
pastoris (L.) Medik., Cardamine amara L., C. dentata Schult., C. impatiens L., C. bulbifera (L.) Crantz, C. quinquefolia
(M. Bieb.) Schmalh., *Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb ex Prantl, *Diplotaxis tenuifolia (L.) DC., Draba nemorosa L., D. verna
L., *Lepidium densiflorum Schrad., *L. draba L., *L. ruderale L., *Raphanus raphanistrum L., Rorippa amphibia (L.)
Besser, R. austriaca (Crantz) Besser, R. sylvestris (L.) Besser, *Sinapis arvensis L., *Sisymbrium loeselii L., *S. officinale
(L.) Scop., *Thlaspi arvense L.
Campanulaceae: Campanula glomerata L., C. patula L., C. persicifolia L., C. rapunculoides L., C. rapunculus L.,
C. rotundifolia L., C. sibirica L., Jasione montana L.
Cannabaceae: *Cannabis sativa L., Humulus lupulus L.
Caprifoliaceae: Lonicera caprifolium L., L. tatarica L., Sambucus ebulus L., S. nigra L., S. racemosa L., Viburnum opulus L.
Caryophyllaceae: Arenaria serpyllifolia L., *Cerastium arvense L., C. holosteoides Fries, Cucubalus baccifer L., Dianthus
armeria L., D. deltoides L., Gypsophila muralis L., Herniaria glabra L., Holosteum umbellatum L., Moehringia trinervia
(L.) Clairv., Psammophiliella muralis (L.) Ikonn., *Saponaria officinalis L., Silene coronaria (L.) Clairv., S. dichotoma Ehrh.,
S. flos-cuculi (L.) Greuter et Burdet, S. latifolia subsp. alba (Mill.) Greuter et Burdet, S. viscaria (L.) Jess., S. vulgaris
(Moench) Garcke, ¡,*Spergula arvensis L., Stellaria aquatica (L.) Scop., S. graminea L., S. holostea L., S. media (L.) Vill.,
S. nemorum L., S. palustris Retz.
Celastraceae: Euonymus europaeus L., E. verrucosus Scop.
Ceratophyllaceae: Ceratophyllum demersum L.
Chenopodiaceae: *Atriplex hortensis L., A. patula L., *A. prostrata Boucher ex DC., *A. sagitatta Borkh., *A. tatarica L.
(A. laciniata L.), Chenopodium album L., *C. rubrum L., *C. strictum Roth
Clusiaceae: Hypericum perforatum L.
Convolvulaceae: Calystegia sepium (L.) R. Br., Convolvulus arvensis L., *Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth
Cornaceae: Cornus sanguinea L.
Corylaceae: Carpinus betulus L., Corylus avellana L.
Crassulaceae: Hylotelephium maximum (L.) Holub., H. maximum subsp. ruprechtii (Jalas) Dostál, *Phedimus spurius
(M. Bieb.) ′t Hart, Sedum acre L., *S. hispanicum L.
Cucurbitaceae: *Echinocystis lobata (Michx.) Torr. et A. Gray.
Сuscutaceae: *Cuscuta europaea L.
Dipsacaceae: Dipsacus pilosus L., Knautia arvensis (L.) Coult., Scabiosa ochroleuca L.
Elaeagnaceae: *Elaeagnus angustifolia L.
Euphorbiaceae: Euphorbia cyparissias L., E. esula L. (E. kaleniczenkoi Czern.), E. semivillosa Prokh., E. virgata Waldst.
et Kit., Mercurialis perennis L.
Fabaceae: *Amorpha fruticosa L., Astragalus cicer L., A. glycyphyllos L., *Caragana arborescens Lam., Chamaecytisus
ruthenicus (Fisch. ex Wol.) Klaskova, Genista tinctoria L., *Gleditsia triacanthos L., Lathyrus niger (L.) Bernh., Lathyrus
pratensis L., L. sylvestris L., *L. tuberosus L., L. vernus (L.) Bernh., Lotus corniculatus L., *Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.,
Medicago falcata L., M. lupulina L., *M. sativa L., Melilotus albus Medik, M. officinalis (L.) Pall., *Onobrychis viciifolia
Scop., Ononis arvensis L., *Robinia pseudoacacia L., Securigera varia (L.) Lassen, Trifolium alpestre L., T. arvense L.,
T. campestre Schreb., T. dubium Sibth., T. fragiferum L., T. medium L., T. montanum L., *T. hybridum L., T. pratense L.,
T. repens L., Vicia cracca L., V. sativa L., V. sepium L., *V. tetrasperma (L.) Schreb., *V. villosa Roth
Fagaceae: Quercus robur L., *Q. rubra L.
Fumariaceae: ′Corydalis cava (L.) Schweigg. et Körte., C. intermedia (L.) Merat, C. solida (L.) Clairv., *Fumaria schleicheri
Soy.-Will., ¡,*F. officinalis L.
Geraniaceae: Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Her., ¡Geranium divaricatum Ehrh., G. palustre L., G. robertianum L.,
*G. pusillum L., G. sanguineum L., *G. sibiricum L., G. sylvaticum L.
Grossulariaceae: *Ribes aureum Pursh., R. nigrum L.
Hippocastanaceae: *Aesculus hippocastanum L.
Juglandaceae: *Juglans ailantifolia Carrière, *J. cinerea L., *J. nigra L., *J. mandshurica Maxim., *J. regia L.,
*J. subcordiformis Dode
60 Plant Introduction • 93/94
S. Koniakin, L. Gubar
Lamiaceae: Ajuga genevensis L., ¡A. reptans L., *Ballota nigra L., Betonica officinalis L., Chaiturus marrubiastrum (L.)
Rchb., Clinopodium acinos (L.) Kuntze, C. vulgare L., Galeopsis bifida Boenn, *G. ladanum L., G. pubescens Besser,
Glechoma hederacea L., G. hirsuta Waldst. et Kit., *Lamium album L., *L. amplexicaule L., L. galeobdolon (L.) L.,
L. maculatum L., *L. purpureum L., *Leonurus cardiaca L., L. villosus Desf. ex D′Urv., Lycopus europaeus L., ¡Marrubium
vulgare L., *Melissa officinalis L., Mentha aquatica L., M. arvensis L., M. longifolia (L.) Huds., *M. piperita L., *Nepeta
cataria L., Origanum vulgare L., Phlomis tuberosa L., Prunella vulgaris L., Salvia nemorosa L., S. pratensis L., *S. sclarea L.,
S. verticillata L., Scutellaria galericulata L., *Stachys annua (L.) L., S. germanica L., S. officinalis (L.) Trevis., S. recta L.,
S. palustris L., S. sylvatica L., Teucrium chamaedrys L., T. scordium L., Thymus marschallianus Willd., T. pulegioides L.
Loranthaceae: Viscum album L.
Lythraceae: Lythrum salicaria L.
Malvaceae: Alcea rosea L., *Althaea officinalis L., Malva thuringiaca (L.) Vis., *M. neglecta Wallr., *M. sylvestris L.
Moraceae: *Morus alba L.
Oleaceae: Fraxinus excelsior L., *F. pennsylvanica Marshall, Ligustrum vulgare L., *Syringa vulgaris L.
Onagraceae: Circaea lutetiana L. Epilobium angustifolium L., *E. adenocaulon Hausskn., E. hirsutum (L.) Scop.,
E. montanum L., E. palustre L., E. parviflorum Schreb., *Oenothera biennis L., *O. rubricaulis Klebahn
Orobanchaceae: Lathraea squamaria L., Melampyrum arvense L., M. nemorosum L., M. pratense L., Rhinanthus minor
Ehrh.
Oxalidaceae: *Oxalis dillenii Jacq., *O. stricta L.
Papaveraceae: Chelidonium majus L., *Papaver dubium L., *P. rhoeas L.
Plantaginaceae: Plantago lanceolata L., P. major L., P. media L., *Veronica arvensis L., V. beccabunga L., V. chamaedrys L.,
V. dillenii Crantz., V. longifolia L., V. officinalis L., *V. persica Poir., *V. polita Fries, V. prostrata L., V. serpyllifolia L.,
V. sublobata M.A. Fisch., V. teucrium L., V. verna L.
Polygonaceae: Fallopia convolvulus (L.) A. Löve, *F. baldschuanica (Regel) Holub, F. dumetorum (L.) Holub, Persicaria
amphibian (L.) Delarbre., P. hydropiper (L.) Delarbre., P. maculosa Gray, P. minor (Huds.) Opiz., Polygonum aviculare L.,
*Reynoutria × bohemica Chrtek et Chrtkova, *R. japonica Houtt., Rumex acetosa L., R. acetosella L., R. confertus Willd.,
R. crispus L., R. obtusifolius L.
Portulacaceae: *Portulaca oleracea L.
Primulaceae: *Lysimachia arvensis (L.) U. Manns et Anderb., L. nummularia L., L. punctata L., L. vulgaris L., ′Primula
veris (L.) L.
Ranunculaceae: Actaea spicata L., Anemonoides ranunculoides (L.) Holub., Caltha palustris L., Clematis recta L.,
*C. vitalba L., *Consolida regalis S.F. Gray, Ficaria verna Huds., ′Isopyrum thalictroides L., Myosurus minimus L.,
Ranunculus acris L., R. auricomus L., R. circinatus Sibth., R. illyricus L., R. polyanthemos L., R. repens L., R. sceleratus L.,
Thalictrum minus L.
Resedaceae: *Reseda lutea L.
Rhamnaceae: Frangula alnus Mill., Rhamnus cathartica L.
Rosaceae: Agrimonia eupatoria L., A. procera Wallr., Argentina anserina (L.) Rydb., Crataegus rhipidophylla Gand.,
Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim., F. vulgaris Moench., ″Fragaria × ananassa (Duchesne ex Weston) Duchesne ex Rozier,
F. vesca L., F. viridis Duch., Geum rivale L., G. urbanum L., Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill., Potentilla argentea L., P. erecta
(L.) Raeusch., P. supina L., *Prunus armeniaca L., P. avium (L.) L., *P. cerasus L., *P. divаricata Ledeb., P. domestica L.,
′P. fruticosa Pall., P. padus L., *P. serotina Enrh., P. spinosa L., Pyrus communis L., Rosa canina L., R. rugosa Thunb., Rubus
caesius L., R. idaeus L., *Sorbaria sorbifolia (L.) A. Braun, Sorbus aucuparia L., *Spiraea japonica L.
Rubiaceae: Cruciata glabra (L.) Ehrend., Galium aparine L., G. odoratum (L.) Scop., G. palustre L., G. verum L.,
*Pelargonium spurium Willd. (G. spurium L.)
Rutaceae: *Phellodendron amurense Rupr., *Ptelea trifoliata L.
Salicaceae: Populus alba L., P. nigra L., P. pyramidalis Rozier., P. tremula L., ¡Salix acutіfolia Willd., S. alba L., S. caprea L.,
S. cinerea L., *S. fragilis L., S. triandra L., S. viminalis L.
Santalaceae: Thesium arvense Horv., T. ramosum Hayne
Saxifragaceae: Chrysosplenium alternifolium L.
Scrophulariaceae: Linaria vulgaris Mill., Odontites vulgaris Moench., Scrophularia nodosa L., S. umbrosa Dumort.,
Verbascum blattaria L., V. lychnitis L., V. nigrum L., V. phlomoides L., V. phoeniceum L., V. thapsiforme Schrad.
Simaroubaceae: *Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle
Solanaceae: Alkekengi officinarum Moench, *Datura stramonium L., *Hyoscyamus niger L., *Solanum lycopersicum L.,
S. dulcamara L., *S. nigrum L.
Tiliaceae: Tilia cordata Mill., *T. platyphyllos Scop.
Ulmaceae: Ulmus glabra Huds., U. laevis Pall., *U. pumila L.
Urticaceae: ¡Parietaria officinalis L., Urtica dioica L., U. galeopsifolia Wierzb. ex Opiz., *U. urens L.
Verbenaceae: *Verbena officinalis L.
Violaceae: *Viola arvensis Murray, V. hirta L., V. mirabilis L., V. odarata L., V. reichenbachiana Jord. ex Boreau,
Plant Introduction • 93/94 61
Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine)
Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна)
Сергій Конякін *, Любов Губарь **
Державна установа “Інститут еволюційної екології НАН України”, вул. академіка Лебедєва, 37, Київ,
03143, Україна; * ser681@ukr.net, ** ogubar@gmail.com
Проаналізовано видовий склад, систематичну та еколого-ценотичну структури флори урочища
Феофанія. На даній території виявлено 650 видів судинних рослин, які презентують 337 родів та
94 родин. Природний компонент флори становить 48,8%, а синантропний – 51,2%. Аборигенна
фракція включає 469 видів з 252 роду, 77 родин. Адвентивна флора представлена 181 видом зі 31
роду, 51 родини. Флора урочища Феофанія тяжіє до флори широколистяних лісів, але внаслідок
синантропізації має більш тісні зв’язки з флорою Давнього Середземномор’я. Для неї характерно
домінування трав’янистих рослин (555 видів / 85,3%), гемікриптофітів (394 види / 60,6%), рослин зі
стрижневим типом кореневої системи (318 видів / 48,9%), з безрозетковими надземними пагонами
(430 видів / 66,1%), з літньозеленим характером вегетації (321 вид / 95,5%), а також з безкореневищним
типом підземних пагонів (206 видів / 31,7%). За результатами аналізу натуралізації видів чужорідних
рослин флори урочища встановлено переважання кенофітів (111 видів) та епекофітів (90 видів), що
пов’язано зі значним рекреаційно-туристичним та антропогенним навантаженням на екосистеми
урочища.
Ключові слова: флористичне різноманіття, систематична структура, чужорідна фракція, урочище Феофанія
V. tricolor L., V. tricolor subsp. matutina (Klokov) Valentine
Vitaceae: *Parthenocissus inserta (A. Kern.) Fritsch., *P. quinquefolia (L.) Planch. *Vitis vinifera L.
|
| id | oai:ojs2.plantintroduction.org:article-1609 |
| institution | Plant Introduction |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-07-17T12:54:05Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | wwwplantintroductionorg/b8/c13f0fef4b5035879833f059003468b8.pdf |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.plantintroduction.org:article-16092023-08-26T20:38:56Z Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine) Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна) Koniakin, Serhii Gubar, Liubov The species composition, systematics, and ecological-coenotic features of the flora of the local landscape Feofaniya have been analyzed. In total, 650 species of vascular plants have been identified in this area, representing 337 genera and 94 families. It was found that the natural component of the flora represents 48.8 %, and synanthropic component represents 51.2 %. The aboriginal fraction includes 469 species from 252 genera and 77 families. Adventive flora is represented by 181 species from 131 genera and 51 families. The flora of the local landscape Feofaniya tends to the flora of broad-leaved forests, but due to synanthropization it has closer ties with the Ancient Mediterranean flora. It is characterized by prevailing of herbaceous plants (555 species or 85.3 %), hemicryptophytes (394 species or 60.6 %), plants with a tap root system (318 species or 48.9 %), with non-rosellate aboveground shoots (430 species or 66.1 %), with summer-green vegetation (621 species or 95.5%), and non-rhizomatous (206 species or 31.7%) type of underground shoots. Based on the analysis of the naturalization of alien plant species in the studied flora, the predominance of kenophytes (111 species) and epecophytes (90 species) was established. Such predominance is associated with significant recreational-touristic and other anthropogenic loads. Проаналізовано видовий склад, систематичну та еколого-ценотичну структури флори урочища Феофанія. На даній території виявлено 650 видів судинних рослин, які презентують 337 родів та 94 родин. Природний компонент флори становить 48,8%, а синантропний – 51,2%. Аборигенна фракція включає 469 видів з 252 роду, 77 родин. Адвентивна флора представлена 181 видом зі 31 роду, 51 родини. Флора урочища Феофанія тяжіє до флори широколистяних лісів, але внаслідок синантропізації має більш тісні зв’язки з флорою Давнього Середземномор’я. Для неї характерно домінування трав’янистих рослин (555 видів / 85,3%), гемікриптофітів (394 види / 60,6%), рослин зі стрижневим типом кореневої системи (318 видів / 48,9%), з безрозетковими надземними пагонами (430 видів / 66,1%), з літньозеленим характером вегетації (321 вид / 95,5%), а також з безкореневищним типом підземних пагонів (206 видів / 31,7%). За результатами аналізу натуралізації видів чужорідних рослин флори урочища встановлено переважання кенофітів (111 видів) та епекофітів (90 видів), що пов’язано зі значним рекреаційно-туристичним та антропогенним навантаженням на екосистеми урочища. M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine 2022-05-20 Article Article application/pdf https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/1609 10.46341/PI2021020 Plant Introduction; No 93/94 (2022); 46-61 Інтродукція Рослин; № 93/94 (2022); 46-61 2663-290X 1605-6574 10.46341/PI93-94 en https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/1609/1528 Copyright (c) 2022 Serhii Koniakin, Liubov Gubar http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Koniakin, Serhii Gubar, Liubov Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна) |
| title | Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна) |
| title_alt | Spontaneous flora of the local landscape Feofaniya (Kyiv, Ukraine) |
| title_full | Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна) |
| title_fullStr | Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна) |
| title_short | Спонтанна флора урочища Феофанія (Київ, Україна) |
| title_sort | спонтанна флора урочища феофанія (київ, україна) |
| url | https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/1609 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT koniakinserhii spontaneousfloraofthelocallandscapefeofaniyakyivukraine AT gubarliubov spontaneousfloraofthelocallandscapefeofaniyakyivukraine AT koniakinserhii spontannaflorauročiŝafeofaníâkiívukraína AT gubarliubov spontannaflorauročiŝafeofaníâkiívukraína |