Варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.)

Objective – to select the best genotypes of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) by morphological properties and to investigate of the qualitative and quantitative content of volatile organic compounds in fruits of the collection of M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine. Mat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2018
Main Authors: Grygorieva, O.V., Klymenko, S.V., Teslyuk, M.G., Onyschuk, L.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine 2018
Online Access:https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/28
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Plant Introduction
Download file: Pdf

Institution

Plant Introduction
_version_ 1860120802436841472
author Grygorieva, O.V.
Klymenko, S.V.
Teslyuk, M.G.
Onyschuk, L.M.
author_facet Grygorieva, O.V.
Klymenko, S.V.
Teslyuk, M.G.
Onyschuk, L.M.
author_sort Grygorieva, O.V.
baseUrl_str https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2019-11-11T08:15:12Z
description Objective – to select the best genotypes of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) by morphological properties and to investigate of the qualitative and quantitative content of volatile organic compounds in fruits of the collection of M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine. Material and methods. There was investigated the 28 genotypes of 30-yea-rold plants that were introduced by seeds from Czech Republic, Carpathians, Kyrgyzstan. Morphometric measurments were conducted: fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, fruit thickness, hilum length, hilum width. The investigation of the volatiles was conducted by the method of Chernohorod and Vinohradov (2006) using cromatographymass spectrometry. Basic statistical analyses were performed using PAST 2.17. Hierarchical cluster analyses of similarity between genotypes were computed on the basis of the Bray-Curtis similarity index. Variability of all these parameters was evaluated using descriptive statistics. Level of variability determined by Stehíková (1998). Correlation between traits was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results. Morphometric parameters were following: weight of fruits from 1.70 to 18.60 g, length – from 8.07 to 33.39 mm, width – from 16.34 to 40.95 mm, thickness – from 9.02 to 28.70 mm and hilum length – from 6.62 to 31.30 mm, hilum width – from 6.50 to 19.99 mm. Index of fruit shape and hilum was determined in range from 0.81 to 0.98 and from 1.48 to 2.03 respectively. During the analysis of qualitative composition and quantitative content of volatiles of fruits from the 2 selected genotypes 74 compounds were detected, and 27 compounds among them were identified. Identified compounds belong to hydrocarbons, aldehydes, carboxylic acids and their ethers, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, triterpenes. Conclusions. Genotypes of seed origin were quite variable. They differ by weight, shape, size and color of fruits. The high level of variation was refered to important selection feature such as mass of fruits, which says about promising of process of selection on this direction. The most genotypes have a small mass of fruits, but certain genotypes characterized by higher sign of fruit mass. The hilum has a various shape and size that can be a diagnostic feature of cultivar characteristic. The outcome of the research points to the fact that the collection of Castanea sativa is a rich source of genetic diversity and might be used in selection for creation of new genotypes and cultivars. Investigated plants are promising raw for future pharmacognostic researches.
doi_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.2230370
first_indexed 2025-07-17T12:39:01Z
format Article
fulltext 74 ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 UDC 582.632.2: 581.4+543.631 O.V. GRYGORIEVA, S.V. KLYMENKO, M.G. TESLYUK, L.M. ONYSCHUK M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine, 01014 Kyiv, Timiryazevska Str., 1 VARIABILITY OF MORPHOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS OF SWEET CHESTNUT (CASTANEA SATIVA MILL.) GENOTYPES FRUITS Objective — to select the best genotypes of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) by morphological properties and to investigate of the qualitative and quantitative content of volatile organic compounds in fruits of the collection of M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine. Material and methods. There was investigated the 28 genotypes of 30­year­old plants that were introduced by seeds from Czech Republic, Carpathians, Kyrgyzstan. Morphometric measurments were conducted: fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, fruit thickness, hilum length, hilum width. The investigation of the volatiles was conducted by the method of Chernohorod and Vinohradov (2006) using cromatography­mass spectrometry. Basic statistical analyses were performed using PAST 2.17. Hier­ archical cluster analyses of similarity between genotypes were computed on the basis of the Bray­Curtis similarity index. Vari­ ability of all these parameters was evaluated using descriptive statistics. Level of variability determined by Stehl � kov � (1998). Correlation between traits was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results. Morphometric parameters were following: weight of fruits from 1.70 to 18.60 g, length — from 8.07 to 33.39 mm, width — from 16.34 to 40.95 mm, thickness — from 9.02 to 28.70 mm and hilum length — from 6.62 to 31.30 mm, hilum width — from 6.50 to 19.99 mm. Index of fruit shape and hilum was determined in range from 0.81 to 0.98 and from 1.48 to 2.03 respectively. During the analysis of qualitative composition and quantitative content of volatiles of fruits from the 2 se­ lected genotypes 74 compounds were detected, and 27 compounds among them were identified. Identified compounds belong to hydrocarbons, aldehydes, carboxylic acids and their ethers, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, triterpenes. Conclusions. Genotypes of seed origin were quite variable. They differ by weight, shape, size and color of fruits. The high level of variation was refered to important selection feature such as mass of fruits, which says about promising of process of se­ lection on this direction. The most genotypes have a small mass of fruits, but certain genotypes characterized by higher sign of fruit mass. The hilum has a various shape and size that can be a diagnostic feature of cultivar characteristic. The outcome of the research points to the fact that the collection of Castanea sativa is a rich source of genetic diversity and might be used in selection for creation of new genotypes and cultivars. Investigated plants are promising raw for future pharma­ cognostic researches. Key words: sweet chestnuts, Forest­Steppe of Ukraine, fruits, morphometric parameters, variability, volatile compounds. © O.V. GRYGORIEVA, S.V. KLYMENKO, M.G. TESLYUK, L.M. ONYSCHUK, 2018 Introduction Less common fruit plants can bring significant benefits to improve nutrition and health, creating of conditions for the development of a regional economy, creation of opportunities for the devel­ opment of small and medium­sized agricultural and processing enterprises, distribution and cul­ tivation of new plant species and for the repro­ duction of natural resources, for practical use in bio energetic, pharmaceutical, cosmetic and other purposes. Species that belong to these important plants are Cornus mas L. [25, 41], Cydonia oblonga Mill., Pseudocydonia sinensis Schneid. [26], Zizi­ phus jujuba Mill. [19, 29], Morus nigra L. [8], Dio­ spyros spp. [24]. Chestnut (Castanea Mill.) has been placed in the Fagaceae family. In total, 13 Castanea species are recognized and are native to the temperate zone of the Northern Hemisphere; five in East Asia, seven in North America and one in Europe [12]. The most important of them are: Castanea sativa Mill. (Europe, Asia Minor, North Africa), C. dentata (Marsh.) Borkh. (USA), Castanea mol­ lissima Blume and C. crenata Sieb. et Zucc. (East­ ern Asia). Castanea sativa (sweet chestnuts) is the 75ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 Variability of morphological parameters and determination of volatile organic compounds of sweet chestnut... most consumed [14]. Castanea sativa fruits are eaten in fresh, baked, boild, dried and smoked. Various dishes include fruits of this plant as an in­ gredient. Also, fruits processed into the flour. It has been used for cooking of cakes, ice­cr� me, sweets and other confectionery. Sweet chestnuts posses many characteristics that are used by hu­ man for different purposes, not only as a part of the food. One of them is the utilization of the sweet chesnut pollen for its pharmacological ben­ efits [23]. Fruits Castanea sativa rich in carbohydrates and is a good source of essential fatty acids [26], min­ erals contents [8, 21], vitamins C and E [20, 46] organic acids [36], polyphenols [33]. From Casta­ nea sativa fruits identified a new pyrrole alkaloid, methyl­(5­formyl­1H­pyrrole­2­yl)­4­hydroxy­ butyrate [1]. Cooked chestnuts are a good source of organic acids and phenolics and have low fat contents, properties that are associated with posi­ tive health benefits [27]. There are many authors who have been re­ searching phenotypic diversity among various lo­ cal populations of sweet chestnut in Italy [5, 30], France [11], Portugal [18], Spain [4, 38], Greece [2], Turkey [15, 37], Romania [9], Slovenia [42], Slovak Republic [39], Czech Republic [17], Bos­ nia and Herzegovina [32], Iran [7] and India [45]. This researches form basis for the selection of the best types from natural populations of sweet chest­ nut [10]. Most of the chestnut cultivars, used in commercial production, were obtained with se­ lection studies from natural chestnut populations [15, 45]. The aim of this study was to select the best geno­ types of Castanea sativa by morphological proper­ ties and to investigate of the qualitative and quanti­ tative content of volatile organic compounds in fruits of the collection of M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Uk raine. Material and methods Locating trees and data collection The objects of the research were 30­year­old plants of sweet chestnut from seed origin, which are grow­ ing in Forest­Steppe of Ukraine in M.M. Grysh ko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine (NBG). Seeds were brought from Czech, Carpa­ thians, Kyrgyzstan [31]. They are well adapt ed to the climatic and soil conditions. Observations on the collection’s forms of sweet chestnut in the pe­ riod of 2013—2015 were performed during mass fruiting. We have described 28 genotypes (referred as CS­01 to CS­28) of sweet chestnut. In autumn, when the nuts began to fall, a sample of 1 kg with burrs was collected from the marked trees. The harvest time was recorded. Morphometric characteristics Pomological characteristics were conducted with four replications on a total 30 nuts per geno­ types. In the study only one plant (tree) used for per genotype. The following measurements were taken: fruit length (FL), in mm, fruit weight (FS), in g, fruit thickness (FT), in mm, fruit width (FW), in mm and hilum length (HL), in mm, hilum width (HW), in mm. The measurements were made in each nut element as shown in Fig. 1. Data, we are working with, were tested for normal distribution. Volatile compounds analysis The investigation of the volatiles was conduct­ ed at the National Institute of Viticulture and Wine “Magarach” by the method of Chernogorod Fig. 1. Variability in the shape of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) fruits 76 ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 O.V. Grygorieva, S.V. Klymenko, M.G. Teslyuk, L.M. Onyschuk and Vinohradov (2006) [22]. The volatiles were investigated by the method of chromatography­ mass spectrometry using the chromatograph Agi­ lent Technologies 6890 N with the mass spectro­ metric detector 5973 N (USA) and a capillary column DB­5 lenght is 30 mm and an internal di­ ameter is 0.25 mm. The carrier gas velocity (He­ lium) was 1.2 ml/min. The ingector heater tem­ perature was 250 °C. The temperature of ter­ mostate was programed from 50 °C to 320 °C at the speed 4 °C. The mas spectra library NIST 05 WILEY 2007 with 470,000 spectra and AMDIS, NIST programs were used to identificate the in­ vestigated compounds. The identification was conducted by comparing obtained mas spectra to mas spectra of standarts. The method of internal standart used to determine the quantitative con­ tent of compounds. Statistical analyses Basic statistical analyses were performed using PAST 2.17; hierarchical cluster analyses of simi­ larity between phenotypes were computed on the basis of the Bray­Curtis similarity index. The vari­ ability of all these parameters was evaluated using descriptive statistics. Level of variability was deter­ mined by Stehlikova (1998) [44]. Correlation be­ tween traits was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results and discussion The weight of the whole fruit is one of significant production characteristics of plant species. Fur­ ther important features of the fruit are shape, size and color. These characteristics of the sweet chest­ nut fruit varied significantly. The images of sweet chestnut fruits of various genotypes are shown on Fig. 1. High variability of the size, shape and color of these fruits are evident. The weight of sweet chestnut fruits of present study was in the range of 1.70 to 20.0 g (Table 1). Coefficient of variation was 45.92 %, which shows a very high degree of variability of fruit weight. Significant differences in fruit weight were reaf­ firmed a lot of authors from different countries. The fruit weight was determined in range from 2.98 to 6.07 g by Aravanopoulos et al. (2001) [6], from 2.94 to 13.40 g by Bolvansky et al. (2012) [39], from 3.50 to 18.60 g by Solar et al. (2005) [43], from 4.32 to 6.67 g by Muji� et al. (2010) [32], from 4.80 to 10.60 g by Odalovic et al. (2013) [35], from 9.00 to 15.00 g by Pereira­Lorenzo et al. (1996) [38], from 9.41 to 16.60 g by Borghetti et al. (1986) [30], from 10.26 to 39.73 g by Ormeci et al. (2016) [37]. Data comparison shows a high consistency with our results. The fruit length in our analyses was determined in the range of 8.07 to 33.39 mm (Table 1). The value of the coefficient of variation was 13.74 %, which documented medium degree of variability of the character within the collection. The fruit length was determined in range from 16.41 to 27.75 mm [39], from 19.10 to 24.90 mm [6], from 19.60 to 30.60 mm [35], from 20.00 to 37.00 mm [43], from 20.45 to 24.89 mm [32], from 24.80 to 32.70 mm [38], from 25.80 to 31.40 mm [4], from 30.39 to 34.31 mm [15]. In case of data compari­ son tested genotypes from Ukraine have low val­ ues on this characteristic. In our experiments the fruit width was deter­ mined in the range of 16.34 to 40.95 mm (Table 1). The variation coefficient (14.98 %) confirmed medium degree of variability within the collec­ tion. The fruit width was determined in range from 12.00 mm [43] to 42.47 mm [37]. In evaluated genotypes we determined the fruit thickness in the range of 9.02 to 28.70 mm (Table 1). The value of the coefficient of variation was 20.57 %, which documents a high degree of variability of the characteristic within the collection. The fruit Table 1. The variability of some morphometric characteristics of fruits for the whole collection of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) genotypes from Kyiv Characteristic n min max x � V% Fruit weight, g 840 1.70 20.0 6.85 45.92 Fruit length, mm 840 8.07 33.39 23.74 13.74 Fruit width, mm 840 16.34 40.95 26.52 14.98 Fruit thickness, mm 840 9.02 28.70 16.62 20.57 Hilum length, mm 840 6.62 31.30 21.15 19.58 Hilum width, mm 840 6.50 19.99 12.24 20.66 Note: n — number of measurements; min, max — minimal and maximal measured values; x� — arithmetic mean; V% — coefficient of variation. 77ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 Variability of morphological parameters and determination of volatile organic compounds of sweet chestnut... thickness was determined in range from 10.80 mm [6] to 27.29 mm [32]. Hilum length was identified in range from 6.62 mm to 31.30 mm (Table 1). The value of the coef­ ficient of variation documented a high degree of variability of these characteristic. The hilum length was determined in range 12.00—32.00 mm [43], 12.90—14.50 mm [6], 19.00—31.00 mm [35]. Hilum width was identified in range from 6.50—19.99 mm (Table 1). The value of the coef­ ficient of variation documented a high degree of variability of these characteristic. The hilum width was determined in range from 6.00 mm [6] to 16.00 mm [32, 43]. The comparison of previous data shows high consistency with our results. Sig­ nificant differences in morphometric characteris­ tics were reaffirmed a lot of authors from different countries. The analysis of coefficient of variation showed the difference of variability of morphological signs between Castanea sativa samples. Data show ed that the most variability of important selection signs are the fruits weight — from 11.60 to 29.04 %. The other characteristics are more or less stable (Fig. 2). The shape of each object can be characterized by the shape index, i.e. the length to width ratio. Fig. 3 represents the shape indexes of fruits and hilum. The shape index of the fruits was found in the range from 1.48 (CS­04) to 2.03 (CS­23), so the genotype’s collection demonstrates significant variability in the shape of the fruit, as seen in Fig. 1. The shape index of the hilum was found in the range from 0.81 (CS­20) to 0.98 (CS­12). This parameter can be used for the identification of the genotypes. The results of the analysis are given in Table 2. Obtained data indicated high correlations (r = = 0.63—0.94). Also, results document that be­ tween specific characteristics exists positive rela­ tionship which is very important in sweet chest­ nut’s breeding. The genetic relationship among the 28 geno­ types was examined by cluster analysis. The figure L ev el o f v ar ia bi li ty , % 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Fruit weight Fruit length Fruit width Fruit thickness Hilum length Hilum width Fig. 2. Variability level according to the minimum and maximum means of a coefficient of variation (CV) depending on morphological character of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) fruit Table 2. The linear relationship between morphometric characteristics of evaluated genotypes of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) Characteristic r sr Confidence interval r 95% r2 FW/FL 0.85 1.60 0.70≤r≥0.93 0.73 FW/FS 0.92 1.38 0.83≤r≥0.96 0.85 FW/FT 0.91 1.13 0.83≤r≥0.96 0.84 FW/HL 0.68 2.48 0.42≤r≥0.84 0.47 FW/HW 0.67 1.58 0.39≤r≥0.83 0.45 HL/HW 0.94 0.69 0.88≤r≥0.97 0.89 FL/FS 0.94 1.20 0.87≤r≥0.97 0.88 FL/FT 0.82 1.63 0.64≤r≥0.91 0.67 FL/HL 0.70 2.43 0.44≤r≥0.85 0.49 FL/HW 0.63 1.64 0.34≤r≥0.81 0.40 FS/FT 0.90 1.19 0.80≤r≥0.95 0.82 FS/HL 0.80 2.00 0.62≤r≥0.90 0.65 FS/HW 0.74 1.42 0.51≤r≥0.87 0.55 FT/HL 0.78 2.13 0.57≤r≥0.89 0.61 FT/ТР 0.77 1.35 0.55≤r≥0.88 0.59 Note: r — Pearson’s correlation coefficient; sr — standard error of the coefficient; r2 — coefficient of determination. 78 ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 O.V. Grygorieva, S.V. Klymenko, M.G. Teslyuk, L.M. Onyschuk CS-01 CS-07 CS-03 CS-08 CS-05 CS-04 CS-20 CS-11 CS-19 CS-18 CS-16 CS-12 CS-24 CS-09 CS-23 CS-15 CS-13 CS-17 CS-10 CS-22 CS-02 CS-25 CS-21 CS-06 CS-28 CS-26 CS-27 CS-14 Genotypes A B C 0.0 1.6 3.2 4.8 6.4 8.0 9.6 11.2 12.8 Fig. 4. Dendrogram of 28 genotypes of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) based on mor­ phometric characteristics of fruits 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 C S -0 1 C S -0 2 C S -0 3 C S -0 4 C S -0 5 C S -0 6 C S -0 7 C S -0 8 C S -0 9 C S -1 0 C S -1 1 C S -1 2 C S -1 3 C S -1 4 C S -1 5 C S -1 6 C S -1 7 C S -1 8 C S -1 9 C S -2 0 C S -2 1 C S -2 2 C S -2 3 C S -2 4 C S -2 5 C S -2 6 C S -2 7 C S -2 8 Genotypes Fruit Hilum Fig. 3. Comparison of tested sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) genotypes in the shape index of fruit and hilum Average distance between clusters S h ap e in de x 79ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 Variability of morphological parameters and determination of volatile organic compounds of sweet chestnut... clearly identified significant differences between tested sweet chestnut genotypes. Dendrogram has showed 3 main groups (Fig. 4). Eight of 28 genotypes were included in cluster group A, 16 genotypes — in group B, 4 genotypes — in group C. The group B had the highest mean for mor­ phological characteristics (fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, fruit thickness, hilum length, hilum width), that were significantly different with other groups. The results of this assessment related to group C had the lowest mean of morphological parameters. Figure confirms the results from the evaluated varia­ bility of morphometric characteris tics (Table 1). Qualitative composition and quantitative con­ tent of volatiles compounds of investigated objects are represented in Fig. 5. It was established that the fruits of CS­11 geno­ type contained 19 substances, among which were identified 15 substances, genotypes CS­20 — 28 and 22, respectively. Among them 11 compounds only are common for investigated genotypes of sweet chestnut. The identified components belong to dif ferent chemical classes, including hydrocarbons, aldehydes, carboxylic acids and their ethers, mo­ no terpenes, sesquiterpenes, triterpenes. Content of volatile compounds was 469.6 (CS­11) and 791.7 (CS­20) mg per 1 kg. Bornilacetate (112.0 mg per 1 kg) and squalene (103.5 mg per 1 kg) prevailed in fruits of CS­11, in fruits of CS­20 — squalene (185.6 mg per 1 kg). Hexanal (48.30—52.50 %) was the main aromatic composition as reported Silvanini et al. (2014) [3]. Differences in volatile compounds are mainly related to the cultivar [13]. By the data of Gounga et al. (2017) [16], 55 vola­ tile organic major compounds were identified in fresh roasted chestnut. Monoterpenes and deriva­ tives of butane, pentane, hexane, and heptane were identified as important aroma impact com­ pounds by Krist et al. (2004) [47]. Conclusions The results of the experiment, presented in this work, are consistent with the results reported ear­ lier. Evaluating of 28 genotypes of sweet chestnut determined the weight of the fruits in the range from 1.70 g (CS­26) to 18.60 g (CS­20), lenght from 8.07 mm (CS­28) to 33.39 mm (CS­11), width from 16.34 mm (CS­28) to 40.95 mm (CS­ 11), thickness from 9.02 mm (CS­26) to 28.70 mm (CS­11) and hilum length from 6.62 mm (CS­26) to 31.30 mm (CS­07), hilum width from 6.50 mm (CS­23) to 19.99 mm (CS­07). The results about relationship between specific characteristics were indicated as a high correlation (r = 0.63—0.94). Also, presented results showed significant differ­ ences in the evaluated characteristics. In this study 27 volatile compounds in the fruits of sweet chestnut were detected, which belong to hydrocarbons, aldehydes, carboxylic acids and their ethers, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, triterpenes. Bornilacetate and squalene are prevailed com­ pounds in the fruits. Obtained results are important for breeding new varieties of sweet chestnut as well as their practical use. 0 50 100 150 200 Hydrocarbons Aldehyde Carboxylic acids and their ethers Monoterpenes Sesquiterpenes TriterpenesCS-11 CS-20 П ро ш у п ід п и са ти ш к ал у H ex ad ec an H ep ta dec an e Tric lo sa n Pen ta co sa n H ep ta co sa ne N onac osa ne O cu m en Lim onen e α- Thujo n β- Thujo n Cis- δ- 1 (6 ), 8-y er id ien e D ih yd ro er yid ad ien e Pin oca m phone Born ila ce ta te M yr ist ic ac id Palm iti c a cid M et hyl palm ita te M et hyl fa rn es oat e H ex ah yd ro fa rn es yla ce to ne G er an yla ce to ne Squale ne β- eu des m ol Eth yl palm ita te Eth yl olea te Eth yle nolat e Buty l p alm ita te D ec an al Fig. 5. The volatiles compounds of fruits of selected genotypes of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.), mg per 1 kg C on te n t, m g / kg 80 ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 O.V. Grygorieva, S.V. Klymenko, M.G. Teslyuk, L.M. Onyschuk This study is significant as first selection work in Ukraine. Researches of adaptation studies will also be required for the selected sweet chestnut genotypes. The results of the study are helpful for under­ standing the variability and attempting the selec­ tion of superior desirable sweet chestnut acces­ sions for bringing to commercial cultivation. Investigated plants are promising raw for future pharmacognostic researches. REFERENCES 1. A new pyrrole alkaloid from seeds of Castanea sativa / A. Hiermann, S. Kedwani, H.W. Schramm [et al.] // Fitoterapia. — 2002. — Vol. 73. — P. 22—27. 2. Alizoti P.G. Genetic variation of fruit traits in hel­ lenic chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) populations: a first assessment / P.G. Alizoti, F.A. Aravanopoulos // Acta Horticulturae. — 2005. — Vol. 693. — P. 413— 420. 3. Altitude effects on fruit morphology and � our com­ position of two chestnut cultivars / A. Silvanini, Ch. Dall’Asta, L. Morrone [et al.] // Scientia Horticultur­ ae. — 2014. — Vol. 176. — P. 311—318. 4. Alvarez­Alvarez P. Differentiation of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) cultivars by leaf, nut and burr dimensions / P. Alvarez­Alvarez, M. Barrio­Anta, U. Die guez­Aranda // Forestry. — 2006. — Vol. 79, N 2. — P. 149—158. 5. Application and evaluation of morphological, pheno­ logical and molecular techniques for the characteriza­ tion of Castanea sativa Mill. Cultivars / G.L. Beccaro, R. Botta, D. Torello Marinoni [et al.] // Acta Horti­ culturae. — 2005. — Vol. 693. — P. 453—458. 6. Aravanopoulos F.A. Electrophoretic and quantitative variation in chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Hel­ lenic populations in old­growthnatural and coppice stands / F.A. Aravanopoulos, A.D. Drouzas, P.G. Ali­ zoti // Forest Snow and Landscape Research. — 2001. — Vol. 76, N 3. — P. 429—434. 7. Atefe K. Variations in leaf and fruit morphological traits of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) in Hyrcanian Forests, Iran / K. Atefe, T.A. Kambiz, T. Javad // In­ ter national Journal of Plant Research. — 2015. — Vol. 1, N 4. — P. 155—161. 8. Biological properties of black mulberry­derived food products (Morus nigra L.) / L. Kucelova, O. Grygorie va, E. Ivani� ov� [et al.] // Journal of Berry Research. — 2016. — Vol. 6, N 3. — P. 333—343. 9. Botu M. Evaluation of some chestnut selections from the population formed into the ecological conditions from the north­east of Oltenia / M. Botu, G. Achim, E. Turcu // Acta Horticulturae. — 1999. — Vol. 494. — P. 77—83. 10. Bounous G. The chestnut: the ultimate energy source nutritional value and alimentary benefits / G. Bou­ nous, R. Botta, G. Beccaro // Nucis. — 2000. — Vol. 9. — P. 44—50. 11. Breisch H. Harvesting, storage and processing of chest­ nuts in France and Italy / H. Breisch // Proceedings of International Congress on Chestnut. — Spoleto, Italy : Universit� di Perugia. — 1993. — P. 429—436. 12. Burnham C.R. Breeding blight­resistant chestnuts / C.R. Burnham, P.A. Rutter, D.W. French // Plant Breeding Reviews. — 1986. — Vol. 4. — P. 347—397. 13. Cirlini M. Volatile � nger printing of chestnut � ours from traditional Emilia Romagna (Italy) cultivars / M. Cirlini, C. Dall’Asta, A. Silvanini // Food Chem. — 2012. — Vol. 134. — P. 662—668. 14. Comparison between phonetic characterization using RAPD and ISSR markers and phenotypic data of cul­ tivated chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) / L. Goul� o, T. Valdiviesso, C. Santana [et al.] // Genetic Resourc­ es and Crop Evolution. — 2001. — Vol. 48. — P. 329— 338. 15. Ertan E. Variability in leaf and fruit morphology and in fruit composition of chestnuts (Castanea sativa Mill.) in the Nazilli region of Turkey / E. Ertan // Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. — 2007. — Vol. 54. — P. 691—699. 16. Gounga M.E. Volatile compounds analysis in chestnuts and chocolate­coated chestnuts using GC — MS / M.E. Gounga, K.A. Omar, I. Amadou // Int. J. Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant Biol. — 2017. — Vol. 4, N 12. — P. 60—67. 17. Haltofov � P. Distribution of sweet chestnut Castanea sativa Mill. in the Czech Republic / P. Haltofov� , L. Jan kov­ sky // Journal of Forest Science. — 2003. — Vol. 49, N 6. — P. 259—272. 18. Characterisation of traditional Portuguese chestnut cul tivars by nuclear SSRS / R. Costa, T. Valdiviesso, L. Marum [et al.] // Acta Horticulturae. — 2005. — Vol. 693. — P. 437—440. 19. Characterization of morphological parameters and bio­ logical activity of jujube fruit (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) / E. Ivani� ov� , O. Grygorieva, V. Abrahamov� [et al.] // Journal of Berry Research. — 2017. — Vol. 7, N 4. — P. 249—260. 20. Characterization of various chestnut cultivars by means of chemometrics approach / E.A. Pe� a­Mendez, M. Her­ n� ndez­Su� rez, C. D� az­Romero [et al.] // Food Che­ mistry. — 2008. — Vol. 107. — P. 537—544. 21. Chemical composition of chestnut cultivars from Spain / S. Pereira­Lorenzo, A.M. Ramos­Cabrer, M.B. D� az­Hern� ndeza [et al.] // Scientia Horticultu­ rae. — 2006. — Vol. 107, N 3. — P. 306—314. 22. Chernogorod L.B. Essential oils of some species of the ge­ nus of Ahillea L. containing fragranol / L.B. Cherno­ gorod, B.A. Vinogradov // Vegetable Resources. — 2006. — Vol. 42, N 2. — P. 61—68. 81ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 Variability of morphological parameters and determination of volatile organic compounds of sweet chestnut... 23. Identification of sweet chesnut pollen in bee pollen pellet using molecular analysis / J. iarovsk! , O. Gry­ gorieva, L. Zele" ! kov! [et al.] // Potravinarstvo. — 2015. — Vol. 9, N 1. — P. 352—358. 24. Introduction, breeding and use of persimmon species (Diospyros spp.) in Ukraine / O. Grygorieva, S. Kly­ menko, J. Brindza [et al.] // Acta Hortic. — 2009. — Vol. 833. — P. 57—62. 25. Klymenko S. Biological bases of seed and vegetative re­ production of cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) in na­ ture and culture / S. Klymenko, O. Grygorieva, L. Ony­ schuk // Agrobiodiversity for improving nutrition, health and life quality. — 2017. — N 1. — P. 233—248. 26. Lipid and fatty acid profile of Castanea sativa Mill. nuts of seventeen native Portuguese cultivars / O. Bor­ ges, J. Carvalho, P. Correia [et al.] // Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. — 2006. — Vol. 20. — P. 80—89. 27. Metabolite composition of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) upon cooking: Proximate analysis, fibre, or­ ganic acids and phenolics / B. Gon# alves, O. Borges, H.C. Soares [et al.] // Food Chemistry. — 2010. — Vol. 122, N 1. — P. 154—160. 28. Morphological and antioxidant characteristics of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) and chinese quince fruit (Pseu­ docydonia sinensis Schneid.) / A. Monka, O. Gry­ gorieva, P. Chlebo [et al.] // Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences. — 2014. — Vol. 8, N 1. — P. 333—340. 29. Morphological characteristic of fruit, drupes and seeds genotypes of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. / O. Grygorieva, V. Abrahamov! , M. Karnatovsk! [et al.] // Potravi­ narstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences. — 2014. — Vol. 8, N 1. — P. 306—314. 30. Morphological variation in chestnut fruits (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Tuscany (Italy) / M. Borghetti, P. Me­ nozzi, G.G. Vendramin [et al.] // Silvae Genetica. — 1986. — vol. 35, N 2­3. — P. 124—128. 31. Morphometric characteristics of sweet chestnut (Casta­ nea sativa Mill.) fruits / O. Grygorieva, S. Klymenko, J. Brindza [et al.] // Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences. — 2017. — Vol. 11, N 1. — P. 288— 295. 32. Muji $ I. Morphological characteristics of chestnut Castanea sativa from the area of NUA­ SANA can­ tion / I. Muji% , V. Alibabici, J. Zivkovic [et al.] // Journal of Central European Agriculture. — 2010. — Vol. 11, N 2. — P. 185—190. 33. Neri L. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of cured chestnuts from three sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) ecotypes from Italy / L. Neri, G. Dimitri, G. Sacchetti // Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. — 2010. — Vol. 23, N 1. — P. 23—29. 34. Nutritional quality of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) cultivars from Portugal / O. Borges, B. Gon# alves, J.L.S. Carvalho [et al.] // Food Chemistry. — 2008. — Vol. 106. — P. 976—984. 35. Odalovic A. Effect of ecological conditions on expres­ sion of biopomological characteristics of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in natural populations of Mon­ tenegro / A. Odalovic, R. Prenkic, D. Dubak [et al.] // Genetika. — 2013. — Vol. 45, N 1. — P. 251—260. 36. Organic acids in two Portuguese chestnut (Castanea sa­ tiva Miller) varieties / B. Ribeiro, J. Rangel, P. Va­ lent& o [et al.] // Food Chemistry. — 2007. — Vol. 100, N 2. — P. 504—508. 37. Ormeci Y. Selection of promising chestnuts (Castanea sativa) among wild growing trees from southern Medi­ terranean region forests of Turkey / Y. Ormeci, Y. Ak ca, S. Ercisli // Journal of Forestry Research. — 2016. — Vol. 27, N 2. — P. 349—355. 38. Pereira­Lorenzo S. Variability and grouping of north­ western Spanish chestnut cultivars. I. Morphological traits / S. Pereira­Lorenzo, J. Fernandez­Lуpez, J. Mo­ reno­Gonzalez // Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. — 1996. — Vol. 121, N 2. — P. 183—189. 39. Phenotypic and genetic differences among populations of European chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Slova­ kia / M. Bolvansky, F. Tokar, D. Tarinova [et al.] // Acta Horticulturae. — 2009. — Vol. 844. — P. 235— 242. 40. SAS, 2009. User’s Guide Version 9. 2. SAS/STAT ® SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA. 41. Slovakian cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.): potential for cultivation / P. Brindza, J. Brindza, D. T' th [et al.] // Acta Hortic. — 2007. — Vol. 760. — P. 433—437. 42. Solar A. Characterisation of seven preselected chestnut fruit types from Slovene chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) population / A. Solar, F. ( tampar, A. Podjavor­) ek [et al.] // Acta Horticulturae. — 1998. — Vol. 494. — P. 95—100. 43. Solar A. Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of euro­ pean chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Slovenia — opportunity for genetic improvement / A. Solar, A. Po­ djavor ) ek, F.S. ( tampar // Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. — 2005. — Vol. 52, N 4. — P. 381—394. 44. Stehlikova B. Basics of bio­statistics (Biodiversity pro­ tection 51) / B. Stehl* kov! . — Nitra: SPU. — 1998. — 79 s. 45. Variability and selection of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) genotypes in Srinagar district of the Kashmir Valley / A.H. Pandit, M.A. Mir, A. Kour [et al.] // Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. — 2011. — Vol. 50, N 2. — P. 205—209. 46. Vitamin E profile as a reliable authenticity discrimina­ tion factor between chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) cultivars / J.C.M. Barreira, R.C. Alves, S. Casal [et al.] // Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. — 2009. — Vol. 57. — P. 5524—5528. 82 ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 O.V. Grygorieva, S.V. Klymenko, M.G. Teslyuk, L.M. Onyschuk 47. Volatile compound analysis of SPME headspace and extract samples from roasted Italian chestnuts (Casta­ nea sativa Mill.) using GC — MS / S. Krist, H. Unter­ weger, F. Bandion // Eur. Food Res. Technol. — 2004. — Vol. 219. — P. 470—473. Recommended by J. Brindza, O.M. Vergun Received 29.12.2017 О.В. Григор’єва, С.В. Клименко, М.Г. Теслюк, Л.М. Онищук Національний ботанічний сад імені М.М. Гришка НАН України, Україна, м. Київ ВАРІАБЕЛЬНІСТЬ МОРФОЛОГІЧНИХ ПАРАМЕТРІВ ТА ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ ЛЕТКИХ РЕЧОВИН ПЛОДІВ ГЕНОТИПІВ КАШТАНА ПОСІВНОГО (CASTANEA SATIVA MILL.) Мета — відібрати найкращі генотипи каштана посів­ ного (Castanea sativa Mill.) за морфологічними показ­ никами та вивчити якісний склад і кількісний вміст летких речовин у плодах рослин з колекції Націо­ нального ботанічного саду імені М.М. Гришка НАН України. Матеріал і методи. Досліджено 28 генотипів 30­річ­ них рослин каштана посівного насінного походження з Чехії, Карпат, Киргизстану. Вивчено морфометричні показники (маса, довжина, ширина і товщина плоду, довжина та ширина рубчика). Дослідження летких речовин проводили за методикою Черногорода та Ви­ ноградова (2006) з використанням хромато­мас­спект­ рометрії. Статистичний аналіз виконували за допо­ могою PAST 2.17. Ієрархічний кластерний аналіз по­ дібності генотипів здійснено за індексом подібності Брей­Кертіса. Варіабельність досліджених парамет­ рів оцінено з використанням методів описової ста­ тистики. Рівень варіабельності визначали за Stehlikova (1998). Наявність зв’язків між параметрами встанов­ лювали за коефіцієнтом кореляції Пірсона. Результати. Виявлено варіабельність морфомет рич­ них параметрів: маса плоду — від 1,70 до 18,60 г, довжи­ на плоду — від 8,07 до 33,39 мм, ширина плоду — від 16,34 до 40,95 мм, товщина плоду — від 9,02 до 28,70 мм, довжина рубчика — від 6,62 до 31,30 мм, ширина руб­ чика — від 6,50 до 19,99 мм. Величина індексу форми плодів та рубчика становила від 0,81 до 0,98 та від 1,48 до 2,03 відповідно. При аналізі складу та вмісту лет­ ких речовин плодів двох відібраних генотипів виявле­ но 74 речовини, з них ідентифіковано 27 сполук (вуг­ леводні, альдегіди, карбонові кислоти та їх ефіри, монотерпени, сесквитерпени, три терпени). Висновки. Генотипи насінного походження з колекції Національного ботанічного саду імені М.М. Гришка НАН України відрізняються за масою, формою, розмі­ ром і кольором плодів. Найбільший рівень мінливості виявлено у такої важливої для селекції ознаки, як маса плоду, що свідчить про перспективність селекції за цим показником. У більшості генотипів невелика маса плодів, лише в деяких цей показник є високим. Рубчик має різну форму та розмір, що можна вико­ ристовувати як діагностичні ознаки для характерис­ тики сорту. Результати дослідження свідчать про те, що колекція каштана їстівного є джерелом генетич­ ної різноманітності та може бути використана для відбору і створення нових генотипів та сортів. Росли­ ни каштана посівного — перспективний матеріал для фармакогностичних досліджень. Ключові слова: каштан посівний, Лісостеп України, плоди, морфометричні параметри, мінливість. О.В. Григорьева, С.В. Клименко, М.Г. Теслюк, Л.Н. Онищук Национальный ботанический сад имени Н.Н. Гришко НАН Украины, Украина, г. Киев ИЗМЕНЧИВОСТЬ МОРФОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ПАРАМЕТРОВ И ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ЛЕТУЧИХ ВЕЩЕСТВ ПЛОДОВ ГЕНОТИПОВ КАШТАНА ПОСЕВНОГО (CASTANEA SATIVA MILL.) Цель — отобрать лучшие генотипы каштана посевно­ го (Castanea sativa Mill.) по морфологическим показа­ телям, изучить качественный состав и количествен­ ное содержание летучих веществ в плодах растений из коллекции Национального ботанического сада имени Н.Н. Гришко НАН Украины. Материал и методы. Исследованы 28 генотипов 30­летних растений каштана посевного семенного происхождения из Чехии, Карпат, Кыргызстана. Изу­ чены морфометрические показатели (масса, длина, ширина и толщина плода, длина и ширина рубчика). Исследование летучих веществ проводили по мето­ дике Черногорода и Виноградова (2006) с использо­ ванием хромато­масс­спектрометрии. Статистический анализ выполняли с помощью PAST 2.17. Ие рар хи­ ческий кластерный анализ сходства между генотипа­ ми осуществлен по индексу сходства Брей­Кертиса. Вариабельность исследованных параметров оцени­ вали с использованием методов описательной стати­ стики. Уровень изменчивости определяли по Stehlikova (1998). Наличие связей между параметрами устанав­ ливали по коэффициенту корреляции Пирсона. Результаты. Выявлена вареабельность морфомет­ рических параметров: масса плода — от 1,70 до 18,60 г, длина плода — от 8,07 до 33,39 мм, ширина плода — от 16,34 до 40,95 мм, толщина плода — от 9,02 до 28,70 мм, длина рубчика — от 6,62 до 31,30 мм, шири­ 83ISSN 1605­6574. Інтродукція рослин, 2018, № 2 Variability of morphological parameters and determination of volatile organic compounds of sweet chestnut... на рубчика — от 6,50 до 19,99 мм. Величина индекса формы плодов и рубчика составляла от 0,81 до 0,98 и от 1,48 до 2,03 соответственно. При анализе состава и содержания летучих веществ плодов 2 отобранных генотипов выявлены 74 вещества, из них идентифи­ цированы 27 соединений (углеводороды, альдегиды, карбоновые кислоты и их эфиры, монотерпены, сес­ квитерпены, тритерпены). Выводы. Генотипы семенного происхождения из коллекции Национального ботанического сада име­ ни Н.Н. Гришко НАН Украины отличаются по массе, форме, размеру и цвету плодов. Наибольший уровень изменчивости выявлен у такого важного для селек­ ции признака, как масса плода, что свидетельствует о перспективности селекции по этому показателю. У большинства генотипов небольшая масса плодов, лишь у некоторых этот показатель высокий. Рубчик имеет разную форму и размер, что можно использо­ вать как диагностические признаки для характерис­ тики сорта. Результаты исследования свидетельст ву­ ют о том, что коллекция каштана съедобного являет­ ся источником генетического разнообразия и может быть использована для отбора и создания новых ге­ нотипов и сортов. Растения каштана посевного — перспективный материал для фармакогностических исследований. Ключевые слова: каштан посевной, Лесостепь Украины, плоды, морфометрические параметры, изменчивость.
id oai:ojs2.plantintroduction.org:article-28
institution Plant Introduction
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2025-07-17T12:39:01Z
publishDate 2018
publisher M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv wwwplantintroductionorg/fc/b17609ae1c520ecfef95f07d8ae855fc.pdf
spelling oai:ojs2.plantintroduction.org:article-282019-11-11T08:15:12Z Variability of morphological parameters and determination of volatile organic compounds of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) genotypes fruits Варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.) Grygorieva, O.V. Klymenko, S.V. Teslyuk, M.G. Onyschuk, L.M. Objective – to select the best genotypes of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) by morphological properties and to investigate of the qualitative and quantitative content of volatile organic compounds in fruits of the collection of M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine. Material and methods. There was investigated the 28 genotypes of 30-yea-rold plants that were introduced by seeds from Czech Republic, Carpathians, Kyrgyzstan. Morphometric measurments were conducted: fruit weight, fruit length, fruit width, fruit thickness, hilum length, hilum width. The investigation of the volatiles was conducted by the method of Chernohorod and Vinohradov (2006) using cromatographymass spectrometry. Basic statistical analyses were performed using PAST 2.17. Hierarchical cluster analyses of similarity between genotypes were computed on the basis of the Bray-Curtis similarity index. Variability of all these parameters was evaluated using descriptive statistics. Level of variability determined by Stehíková (1998). Correlation between traits was determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results. Morphometric parameters were following: weight of fruits from 1.70 to 18.60 g, length – from 8.07 to 33.39 mm, width – from 16.34 to 40.95 mm, thickness – from 9.02 to 28.70 mm and hilum length – from 6.62 to 31.30 mm, hilum width – from 6.50 to 19.99 mm. Index of fruit shape and hilum was determined in range from 0.81 to 0.98 and from 1.48 to 2.03 respectively. During the analysis of qualitative composition and quantitative content of volatiles of fruits from the 2 selected genotypes 74 compounds were detected, and 27 compounds among them were identified. Identified compounds belong to hydrocarbons, aldehydes, carboxylic acids and their ethers, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, triterpenes. Conclusions. Genotypes of seed origin were quite variable. They differ by weight, shape, size and color of fruits. The high level of variation was refered to important selection feature such as mass of fruits, which says about promising of process of selection on this direction. The most genotypes have a small mass of fruits, but certain genotypes characterized by higher sign of fruit mass. The hilum has a various shape and size that can be a diagnostic feature of cultivar characteristic. The outcome of the research points to the fact that the collection of Castanea sativa is a rich source of genetic diversity and might be used in selection for creation of new genotypes and cultivars. Investigated plants are promising raw for future pharmacognostic researches. Мета – відібрати найкращі генотипи каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.) за морфологічними показниками та вивчити якісний склад і кількісний вміст летких речовин у плодах рослин з колекції Національного ботанічного саду імені М.М. Гришка НАН України. Матеріал і методи. Досліджено 28 генотипів 30-річ-них рослин каштана посівного насінного походження з Чехії, Карпат, Киргизстану. Вивчено морфометричні показники (маса, довжина, ширина і товщина плоду, довжина та ширина рубчика). Дослідження летких речовин проводили за методикою Черногорода та Виноградова (2006) з використанням хромато-мас-спект-рометрії. Статистичний аналіз виконували за допомогою PAST 2.17. Ієрархічний кластерний аналіз подібності генотипів здійснено за індексом подібності Брей-Кертіса. Варіабельність досліджених параметрів оцінено з використанням методів описової статистики. Рівень варіабельності визначали за Stehlikova (1998). Наявність зв’язків між параметрами встановлювали за коефіцієнтом кореляції Пірсона. Результати. Виявлено варіабельність морфометрич-них параметрів: маса плоду – від 1,70 до 18,60 г, довжина плоду – від 8,07 до 33,39 мм, ширина плоду – від 16,34 до 40,95 мм, товщина плоду – від 9,02 до 28,70 мм, довжина рубчика – від 6,62 до 31,30 мм, ширина рубчика — від 6,50 до 19,99 мм. Величина індексу форми плодів та рубчика становила від 0,81 до 0,98 та від 1,48 до 2,03 відповідно. При аналізі складу та вмісту летких речовин плодів двох відібраних генотипів виявлено 74 речовини, з них ідентифіковано 27 сполук (вуглеводні, альдегіди, карбонові кислоти та їх ефіри, монотерпени, сесквитерпени, три терпени). Висновки. Генотипи насінного походження з колекції Національного ботанічного саду імені М.М. Гришка НАН України відрізняються за масою, формою, розміром і кольором плодів. Найбільший рівень мінливості виявлено у такої важливої для селекції ознаки, як маса плоду, що свідчить про перспективність селекції за цим показником. У більшості генотипів невелика маса плодів, лише в деяких цей показник є високим. Рубчик має різну форму та розмір, що можна використовувати як діагностичні ознаки для характеристики сорту. Результати дослідження свідчать про те, що колекція каштана їстівного є джерелом генетичної різноманітності та може бути використана для відбору і створення нових генотипів та сортів. Рослини каштана посівного – перспективний матеріал для фармакогностичних досліджень. M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine 2018-05-01 Article Article application/pdf https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/28 10.5281/zenodo.2230370 Plant Introduction; Vol 78 (2018); 74-83 Інтродукція Рослин; Том 78 (2018); 74-83 2663-290X 1605-6574 10.5281/zenodo.3377684 en https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/28/22 Copyright (c) 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Grygorieva, O.V.
Klymenko, S.V.
Teslyuk, M.G.
Onyschuk, L.M.
Варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.)
title Варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.)
title_alt Variability of morphological parameters and determination of volatile organic compounds of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) genotypes fruits
title_full Варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.)
title_fullStr Варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.)
title_full_unstemmed Варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.)
title_short Варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (Castanea sativa Mill.)
title_sort варіабельність морфологічних параметрів та визначення летких речовин плодів генотипів каштана посівного (castanea sativa mill.)
url https://www.plantintroduction.org/index.php/pi/article/view/28
work_keys_str_mv AT grygorievaov variabilityofmorphologicalparametersanddeterminationofvolatileorganiccompoundsofsweetchestnutcastaneasativamillgenotypesfruits
AT klymenkosv variabilityofmorphologicalparametersanddeterminationofvolatileorganiccompoundsofsweetchestnutcastaneasativamillgenotypesfruits
AT teslyukmg variabilityofmorphologicalparametersanddeterminationofvolatileorganiccompoundsofsweetchestnutcastaneasativamillgenotypesfruits
AT onyschuklm variabilityofmorphologicalparametersanddeterminationofvolatileorganiccompoundsofsweetchestnutcastaneasativamillgenotypesfruits
AT grygorievaov varíabelʹnístʹmorfologíčnihparametrívtaviznačennâletkihrečovinplodívgenotipívkaštanaposívnogocastaneasativamill
AT klymenkosv varíabelʹnístʹmorfologíčnihparametrívtaviznačennâletkihrečovinplodívgenotipívkaštanaposívnogocastaneasativamill
AT teslyukmg varíabelʹnístʹmorfologíčnihparametrívtaviznačennâletkihrečovinplodívgenotipívkaštanaposívnogocastaneasativamill
AT onyschuklm varíabelʹnístʹmorfologíčnihparametrívtaviznačennâletkihrečovinplodívgenotipívkaštanaposívnogocastaneasativamill