РЕТРОСПЕКТИВНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ВАРТОСТІ ПОХИБКИ ПРОГНОЗУ ДЛЯ ПОБУДОВИ БАЛАНСУЮЧИХ ГРУП ВИРОБНИКІВ З ВІДНОВЛЮВАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ ЕНЕРГІЇ

The significant increase in the installed capacity of power plants with renewable energy sources and the imbalance of the financial system of the wholesale electricity market of Ukraine prompted the Ministry of Energy to develop an alternative support mechanism for RES producers. The introduction of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2023
Hauptverfasser: Мірошник, В.О., Лоскутов, С.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Ukrainian
Veröffentlicht: Інститут електродинаміки Національної академії наук України 2023
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://prc.ied.org.ua/index.php/proceedings/article/view/327
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Proceedings of the Institute of Electrodynamics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Institution

Proceedings of the Institute of Electrodynamics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The significant increase in the installed capacity of power plants with renewable energy sources and the imbalance of the financial system of the wholesale electricity market of Ukraine prompted the Ministry of Energy to develop an alternative support mechanism for RES producers. The introduction of a feed-in tariff (FIP), which compensates for the difference between the actual sale price of electricity and the "green" tariff, can help producers receive more money immediately after the electricity is released. However, studies have shown that exiting a balancing group without forming a new one can lead to increased costs associated with forecasting error. It is important for manufacturers to form independent balancing groups to compensate for negative consequences. The findings of the article show that there is no single optimal balancing group for all manufacturers, but some groups are often repeated. Switching to a separate balancing group can have a significant economic effect for the manufacturer, reducing the cost of forecasting error compared to being solely responsible for the imbalance. However, the balancing group determined by the method of retrospective calculation of the cost of the forecast error is not stable in the long term. References 4, fig. 2, tab. 3