УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ
Introduction. One of the determining factors in shaping the directions for the development of construction infrastructure is the increase in the level of energy efficiency of enterprises. This factor is considered a necessary condition for sustainable development, for ensuring environmental and econ...
Gespeichert in:
| Datum: | 2026 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
PH “Akademperiodyka”
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | https://scinn-eng.org.ua/ojs/index.php/ni/article/view/1158 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Назва журналу: | Science and Innovation |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Institution
Science and Innovation| _version_ | 1868294489195413504 |
|---|---|
| author | PIDODNIA, O. DVORNICHENKO, A. DANYLOVA, T. NECHEPURENKO, D. KRAVCHUNOVSKA, T. |
| author_facet | PIDODNIA, O. DVORNICHENKO, A. DANYLOVA, T. NECHEPURENKO, D. KRAVCHUNOVSKA, T. |
| author_institution_txt_mv | [
{
"author": "O. PIDODNIA",
"institution": "Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Educational and Scientifi c Institute “Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture,”"
},
{
"author": "A. DVORNICHENKO",
"institution": "Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Educational and Scientifi c Institute “Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture,”"
},
{
"author": "T. DANYLOVA",
"institution": "Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Educational and Scientifi c Institute “Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture,”"
},
{
"author": "D. NECHEPURENKO",
"institution": "Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Educational and Scientifi c Institute “Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture,”"
},
{
"author": "T. KRAVCHUNOVSKA",
"institution": "Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Educational and Scientifi c Institute “Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture,”"
}
] |
| author_sort | PIDODNIA, O. |
| baseUrl_str | https://scinn-eng.org.ua/ojs/index.php/ni/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2026-06-17T11:30:40Z |
| description | Introduction. One of the determining factors in shaping the directions for the development of construction infrastructure is the increase in the level of energy efficiency of enterprises. This factor is considered a necessary condition for sustainable development, for ensuring environmental and economic security, for facilitating integration into the European energy space, and for supporting the formation of an energy-independent national economy.Problem Statement. The improvement of organizational and technological solutions for the reconstruction of construction enterprises is becoming increasingly relevant in the context of rising requirements for energy efficiency and environmental security. These conditions necessitate the search for scientifically substantiated approaches to the modernization of production facilities and technological processes.Purpose. The purpose of this study is the development and scientific substantiation of effective organizational and technological solutions for the reconstruction of construction enterprises, taking into account contemporary requirements for energy efficiency, environmental safety, and economic feasibility, with the aim of increasing their competitiveness and ensuring sustainable development.Materials and Methods. The research methodology includes a systematic and comparative analysis of scholarly research publications of 2020—2025. In addition, the study has applied BIM-based modeling, INOVA analysis of innovative solutions, the weighted coefficient method, and economic methods for eva luating investment efficiency. The empirical base of the study consists of technical and design documentation of buildings, as well as statistical data on actual energy consumption collected over several years.Results. The study has demonstrated that the comprehensive implementation of energy-saving measures significantly improves the energy performance of construction enterprises. In particular, the obtained results have shown that electricity consumption may decrease by 30—35%, while thermal energy consumption may be reduced by 40—50%. Furthermore, the conducted INOVA analysis has revealed a high level of innovation potential in the proposed technological and organizational solutions.Conclusions. The application of the proposed approaches makes it possible not only to reduce energy consumptionand operational costs, but also to increase the overall sustainability of construction enterprises. The results of the study can serve as a basis for the development of regulatory and methodological frameworks aimed at the energy modernization of industrial and construction facilities. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.15407/scine22.03.095 |
| first_indexed | 2026-06-18T01:01:09Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3) 95
© Publisher PH “Akademperiodyka” of the NAS of Ukraine, 2026. Th is is an open access article
under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
IMPROVEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL
AND TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS
FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION
ENTERPRISES GIVEN ENERGY-SAVING REQUIREMENTS
Introduction. One of the determining factors in shaping the directions for the development of construc-
tion infrastructure is the increase in the level of energy effi ciency of enterprises. Th is factor is considered
a necessary condition for sustainable development, for ensuring environmental and economic security,
for facilitating integration into the European energy space, and for supporting the formation of an ener-
gy-independent national economy.
Problem Statement. Th e improvement of organizational and technological solutions for the reconst-
ruction of construction enterprises is becoming increasingly relevant in the context of rising requirements
for energy effi ciency and environmental security. Th ese conditions necessitate the search for scientifi -
cally substantiated approaches to the modernization of production facilities and technological processes.
Purpose. Th e purpose of this study is the development and scientifi c substantiation of eff ective orga-
nizational and technological solutions for the reconstruction of construction enterprises, taking into
account contemporary requirements for energy effi ciency, environmental safety, and economic feasibility,
with the aim of increasing their competitiveness and ensuring sustainable development.
Materials and Methods. Th e research methodology includes a systematic and comparative analysis
of scholarly research publications of 2020—2025. In addition, the study has applied BIM-based modeling,
Citat ion: Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Krav-
chunovska, T. S. (2026). Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Mo der-
nization of Construction Enterprises Given Energy-Saving Requirements. Sci. innov., 22(3), 95—116.
https://doi.org/10.15407/scine22.03.095
https://doi.org/10.15407/scine22.03.095
PIDODNIA, O. H. (https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2156-0682),
DVORNICHENKO, A. D. (https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0287-4989),
DANYLOVA, T. V. (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-0154),
NECHEPURENKO, D. S. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-4790),
and KRAVCHUNOVSKA, T. S. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-8995)
Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies,
Educational and Scientifi c Institute “Prydniprovska State Academy
of Civil Engineering and Architecture,”
24-a, Architect Oleh Petrova St., Dnipro, 49005, Ukraine,
+380 95 855 2063, prkom@pdaba.edu.ua
96 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
INOVA analysis of innovative solutions, the weighted coeffi cient method, and economic methods for eva luating invest-
ment effi ciency. Th e empirical base of the study consists of technical and design documentation of buildings, as well as
statistical data on actual energy consumption collected over several years.
Results. Th e study has demonstrated that the comprehensive implementation of energy-saving measures signifi -
cantly improves the energy performance of construction enterprises. In particular, the obtained results have shown that
electricity consumption may decrease by 30—35%, while thermal energy consumption may be reduced by 40—50%.
Furthermore, the conducted INOVA analysis has revealed a high level of innovation potential in the proposed techno-
logical and organizational solutions.
Conclusions. Th e application of the proposed approaches makes it possible not only to reduce energy consumption
and operational costs, but also to increase the overall sustainability of construction enterprises. Th e results of the study
can serve as a basis for the development of regulatory and methodological frameworks aimed at the energy moderni-
zation of industrial and construction facilities.
Keywords: construction, organizational and technological solutions, energy saving, BIM, INOVA analysis, sustainable
development, economic feasibility, environmental effi ciency.
At the current stage of development of Ukraine’s
construction industry, a number of systemic chal-
lenges have emerged that require profound scien-
tific reconsideration and practical resolution. Wi-
thin this context, one of the key factors determining
the development priorities of construction infra-
structure is the improvement of the energy efficien-
cy of enterprises as a prerequisite for sustainable
development, environmental and economic secu-
rity, integration into the European energy space,
and the formation of an energy-independent na-
tional economy [1].
Construction enterprises, as structural compo-
nents of the country’s investment and construc-
tion complex, significantly contribute to the tech-
nogenic burden on the environment due to the
large volumes of energy and material resources
they consume [2].
As noted in [3], most construction enterprises in
Ukraine were built in previous decades without
consideration of modern requirements related to
energy efficiency, production automation, environ-
mental performance, and adaptability to digital
transformations. Consequently, the systemic re-
const ruction of such enterprises from the perspec-
tive of innovative development, resource efficiency,
and technogenic safety has become not only an ob-
jective necessity but also a strategic direction for
the development of the industry. In this context,
the improvement of organizational and techno-
logical solutions in the process of reconstruction
represents a complex problem that encompasses
several interrelated aspects: technical (energy sys-
tems, engineering networks, and building struc-
tures); technological (optimization of construction
and installation processes and the implementation
of energy-saving technologies); organizational
(plan ning, resource management, and digital mo-
ni toring tools); legal and regulatory (compliance
with national and international energy efficiency
standards); and economic (life-cycle assessment,
investment payback periods, and the formation
of the enterprise energy balance).
According to studies [4, 5], in the contempora-
ry context of the global energy transition — cha-
racterized by decarbonization, digitalization, and
the decentralization of energy systems — the mo-
dernization of organizational and technological
solutions in the reconstruction sector must be ba-
sed on the principles of scientific substantiation,
systematization, multi-criteria planning, and the
integration of modern project-management tools.
These include BIM (Building Information Mode-
ling), energy management systems compliant with
ISO 50001, and digital twins used for modeling
and forecasting energy consumption [6]. There-
fore, improving the energy efficiency of construc-
tion enterprises during reconstruction cannot be
limited to the modernization of individual engi-
neering subsystems; rather, it requires the forma-
97ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
tion of a fundamentally new paradigm of organiza-
tional and technological design. Such a paradigm
should incorporate a comprehensive energy balan-
ce, resource circularity, adaptability to environmen-
tal changes, and long-term economic efficiency.
Based on the above, the relevance of this re-
search topic is determined not only by national
economic needs but also by global trends toward
a “green” economy, compliance with internatio-
nal climate commitments, and the necessity to
harmonize Ukraine’s regulatory framework in the
field of energy-efficient construction and reconst-
ruction with the directives of the European Union,
particularly Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy
performance of buildings. In this context, the imp-
rovement of organizational and technological so-
lutions for the reconstruction of construction en-
terprises, taking into account energy-saving requi-
rements, becomes an interdisciplinary scientific
problem. Its solution simultaneously contributes
to reducing energy consumption in the construc-
tion sector, increasing environmental and tech-
nogenic safety, improving the competitiveness of
domestic enterprises in the international market,
and achieving national objectives related to sustai-
nable development and energy independence [7].
Thus, research in this scientific direction has
not only applied but also strategic significance for
the development of the construction sector and
the national economy as a whole.
The purpose of the study is to improve organi-
zational and technological solutions for the reconst-
ruction of construction enterprises while taking
into account energy-saving requirements, in order
to increase energy efficiency, environmental safe-
ty, and the competitiveness of enterprises.
The objectives arising from this purpose include:
developing conceptual approaches to improving
organizational and technological solutions for
reconstruction, with particular emphasis on in-
tegrating energy-efficient technologies into the
reconstruction process;
examining the influence of the existing regula-
tory framework on the effectiveness of these
processes and proposing directions for its imp-
rovement to ensure more efficient use of ener-
gy resources;
analyzing international experience in building
reconstruction with an emphasis on energy ef-
ficiency and adapting these practices to the con-
ditions of the Ukrainian construction market.
All these tasks are aimed at achieving the over-
all objective of the study — improving organiza-
tional and technological solutions for reconstruc-
tion while considering energy-saving requirements
in order to support the sustainable development
of the sector.
Over the past five years, academic discourse on
improving organizational and technological solu-
tions for the reconstruction of construction enter-
prises while considering energy-saving require-
ments has advanced significantly. However, seve-
ral critical issues remain unresolved. An analysis
of Ukrainian and international scholarly publica-
tions from 2020 to 2025 demonstrates that the
im portance of transitioning to energy-efficient
models of enterprise operation has been widely re-
cognized. Nevertheless, the systematic and inter-
disciplinary implementation of such solutions re-
mains at an early stage of integration into design
and production practices.
For instance, studies [8, 9] have demonstrated
the effectiveness of digital twins in the reconst-
ruction of industrial buildings, emphasizing their
potential for integrated modeling of energy flows,
material resources, and time expenditures. Howe-
ver, these studies do not provide concrete tools
for implementing such solutions in small and me-
dium-sized construction enterprises operating in
transitional economies.
In study [10], the application of the circular
economy concept to the modernization of indus-
trial facilities was examined. The authors propo-
sed a methodology for integrated resource mana-
gement aimed at reducing energy consumption,
based on the “energy elasticity model of the en-
terprise.” While theoretically promising, this app-
roach does not take into account the actual time-
frames of reconstruction or the regulatory chal-
lenges — particularly relevant in Ukraine.
98 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian scholars [11] have inves-
tigated energy-efficient solutions in the context of
upgrading construction infrastructure through the
modernization of engineering networks. Their
work proposed a phased energy audit system and
provided recommendations for the use of high-
effi ciency equipment. However, the methodolo gi-
cal developments presented in this study are lar-
gely fragmentary, as they focus primarily on indi-
vidual technical components rather than on the
transformation of the overall organizational and
technological structure of the enterprise.
Another noteworthy publication [12] presents
a methodology for the use of intelligent energy sys-
tems based on artificial intelligence. The study de-
monstrates the effectiveness of self-adaptive algo-
rithms for optimizing energy consumption, which
can be integrated into construction project mana-
gement systems. However, the practical case stu-
dies presented in this work mostly concern new
construction projects rather than the reconstruc-
tion of existing facilities, where spatial, technical,
and financial constraints are critically important.
Among systemic reviews that have provided a
foundation for subsequent practical decisions, the
study presented in [12] deserves particular attention.
It examines the barriers to implementing energy
management systems compliant with ISO 50001
in small and medium-sized construction enterpri-
ses. The authors identify the principal obstacles as
a lack of qualified personnel, insufficient financial
instruments to support modernization, and low
motivation among owners and managers to pur-
sue energy-saving transformations.
An analysis of professional sources also indica tes
that the growing attention of researchers to con tem-
porary aspects of improving organizational and tech-
nological solutions for the reconstruction of con st-
ruction enterprises, while taking energy-sa ving re-
quirements into account, is primarily driven by the
need to reduce energy consumption, enhan ce envi-
ronmental safety, and ensure enterprise compe titi-
veness. However, despite the availability of relevant
studies, several important problems remain that
require a comprehensive and integrated approach.
One of the primary challenges in this research
area is the limited incorporation of advanced digi-
tal technologies into the reconstruction process.
For instance, study [13] presents the AI4EF plat-
form that employs artificial intelligence to opti-
mize building energy consumption. The platform
facilitates the modeling and forecasting of energy
use while enabling evaluation of different moder-
nization scenarios. Nevertheless, its implementa-
tion in the reconstruction of construction enter-
prises requires additional investigation and adap-
tation to the sector’s specific technological and
organizational conditions.
Another significant challenge within this the-
matic area is the absence of standardized metho-
dologies for evaluating the energy efficiency of re-
construction measures. Study [14] has proposed
the use of digital twins combined with deep lear-
ning to analyze building energy consumption.
This approach facilitates the identification of pat-
terns and the optimization of energy processes.
Nevertheless, its practical application in the re-
construction of construction enterprises requires
the development of specialized models and im-
plementation tools.
It should also be noted that the majority of exis-
ting research focuses on technical aspects of ener-
gy efficiency, whereas organizational and manage-
rial dimensions remain underexplored. For instance,
study [15] has examined methods for shaping bu-
siness processes in construction enterprises ba-
sed on the sustainable development concept. The
authors emphasize the necessity of implementing
innovative business process management systems
to ensure sustainable enterprise growth. However,
practical guidelines for integrating such systems
into the reconstruction process of construction en-
terprises are largely absent.
Additionally, there is an urgent need to develop
effective financing strategies for energy-efficient
interventions. Study [16] has analyzed investment
opportunities for enhancing energy efficiency in
public buildings in Ukraine. The authors high-
light the importance of involving both public and
private sectors in financing energy-saving initia-
99ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
tives. Yet, the specific financial mechanisms re-
quired for the reconstruction of construction en-
terprises remain insufficiently explored and war-
rant targeted investigation.
A further challenge is the limited integration of
modern digital technologies into reconstruction
processes. For example, study [17] has introduced
the AI4EF platform, which leverages artificial in-
telligence to optimize energy consumption in buil-
dings. This platform enables the modeling and fo-
recasting of energy expenditures and supports the
evaluation of various modernization scenarios.
However, its application in reconstructing const-
ruction enterprises demands additional study and
adaptation to the unique technical and organiza-
tional characteristics of these enterprises.
Similarly, the lack of unified methodologies for
assessing the energy efficiency of reconstruction
activities remains a critical gap. Study [18] has
advocated using digital twins and deep learning
to analyze energy consumption in buildings, en-
abling the identification of inefficiencies and opti-
mization of energy flows. Yet, implementing this
approach in practical reconstruction projects ne-
cessitates the development of specialized analyti-
cal models and operational tools.
It is also important to note that most contem-
porary research prioritizes technical solutions, lea-
ving organizational and managerial aspects un-
derdeveloped. For example, study [15] has exami-
ned approaches for designing business processes
in construction enterprises based on sustainable
development principles. While the study under-
scores the importance of innovative business pro-
cess management systems to promote sustainable
enterprise growth, actionable recommendations
for integrating such systems into reconstruction
projects are lacking.
As of 2024—2025, the need to formulate effecti-
ve financing strategies for energy-efficient measu res
has become increasingly pressing. Studies [6, 11]
have explored investment opportunities in energy
efficiency for public buildings in Ukraine, empha-
sizing the role of both public and private sectors
in funding such initiatives. Nonetheless, the fi-
nancial frameworks necessary for reconstructing
construction enterprises remain largely unexplo-
red and require focused research.
Continuing this line of analysis, recent works
by Ukrainian researchers have addressed not only
technical but also regulatory, organizational, eco-
nomic, and methodological aspects of moderni-
zing the construction sector with a focus on ener-
gy efficiency. For example, study [19] identifies
the lack of integrated reconstruction models that
combine design-technological, energy, and mana-
gement solutions within a unified digital platform.
The author proposes the concept of a “new-gene-
ration energy-efficient enterprise,” which entails
not only the physical modernization of buildings
but also the transformation of logistics and pro-
duction processes through BIM technologies and
automated monitoring systems. However, this con-
cept remains largely theoretical and requires vali-
dation through applied research and pilot projects.
In [20], a critically important issue is highligh-
ted — the inconsistency between current building
regulations and contemporary energy efficiency
requirements, particularly in the context of indust-
rial reconstruction. The author notes that Ukrai-
nian building codes (DBN) and national standards
(DSTU) remain largely oriented toward new const-
ruction and fail to address the full spectrum of
solutions necessary for the energy modernization
of existing production facilities. This need for
regulatory updating is corroborated by analytical
reports from the State Agency on Energy Effi-
ciency and Energy Saving of Ukraine (SAEE)
spanning 2021—2023, which stress the necessity
of developing specialized regulations and meth-
odological guidelines specifically tailored for re-
construction projects.
A separate contribution comes from study [21],
which systematizes typical energy losses in const-
ruction production facilities in Ukraine and iden-
tifies shortcomings in existing mechanisms for
their accounting and compensation. The authors
propose the creation of “energy passports for re-
construction,” designed to structurally capture the
expected dynamics of energy consumption be -
100 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
fore and after reconstruction at the enterprise le-
vel. Ho we ver, in practical application, such pass-
ports remain largely unused due to the absence of
a unified methodology for evaluating reconstruc-
tion efficiency.
Regarding the economic justification of energy-
efficient solutions, study [22] emphasizes the un-
derutilized potential of energy service contracts in
the construction sector. While such mechanisms
are widely adopted in the public sector (e.g., schools
and hospitals), their application in industrial buil-
dings of construction enterprises is minimal. Pan-
chenko underscores the need to develop specia-
lized financial instruments to support reconst ruc-
tion initiatives in private construction firms.
Many Ukrainian scholars have also proposed al-
gorithms for calculating thermal modernization
measures, accounting for phase changes in mois-
ture regimes and dynamic climatic factors. While
the practical application of these models can subs-
tantially enhance energy efficiency, barriers persist
due to the complexity of integrating them into
standard design and reconstruction projects.
Overall, the literature review over the past five
years demonstrates that key research directions
have focused on:
Development of innovative organizational and
technological reconstruction models;
Adaptation and integration of modern digital
technologies;
Advancement and harmonization of regulato-
ry frameworks;
Methodologies for assessing energy efficiency;
Economic instruments and incentives for re-
construction;
Engineering-physical aspects of building mo-
dernization [23].
All of these research directions require more in-
depth interdisciplinary investigation at both theo re-
tical and applied levels, underscoring the continued
relevance of comprehensive research in this field.
In conclusion, contemporary academic discour-
se increasingly emphasizes the transition from tech-
nically focused reconstruction approaches toward
comprehensive organizational and technological
models, where energy efficiency is integrated into
strategic planning and management. Neverthe-
less, the systematic implementation of such mo-
dels remains constrained by:
Limited methodological frameworks;
Insufficiently adapted mechanisms for techno-
logy transfer;
Incomplete or inconsistent regulatory structures.
Addressing these challenges demands holistic,
interdisciplinary collaboration across scientific,
en gineering, regulatory, and economic domains.
The research methodology has been based on an
integrated approach, combining theoretical and
app lied methods to enhance organizational and
technological solutions for the reconstruction of
construction enterprises, with particular attention
to energy-saving requirements. The study has emp-
loyed both qualitative and quantitative methods to
provide a comprehensive analysis of existing app-
roaches and to develop new solutions aimed at imp-
roving energy efficiency in the construction sector.
A central component of the methodology has
involved a systematic review of the literature and
the synthesis of existing knowledge in the field.
Particular emphasis has been placed on analyzing
recent publications addressing building reconst-
ruction, energy efficiency, and sustainable deve-
lopment. The literature has been selected for the
period from 2020 to 2025, enabling the collection
of the most relevant and up-to-date materials. To
ensure scientific rigor and relevance, publications
have been drawn from authoritative international
databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and
Google Scholar, as well as national sources, such as
Ukrainian peer-reviewed journals “Energy Sa ving
and Energy Efficiency,” “Construction and Archi-
tecture,” and other publications meeting establi-
shed criteria for relevance and scientific significance.
Literature sources have been selected according
to criteria including scientific validity, practical app-
licability, methodological rigor, and the compre-
hensiveness of data. The final sample has compri-
sed articles, monographs, and dissertations add-
ressing energy-saving practices in construction,
the application of innovative technologies, and the
101ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
economic and environmental aspects of building
reconstruction. Works incorporating experimen-
tal studies, theoretical frameworks, and practical
examples of energy-efficient technology imple-
mentation have been prioritized. In addition, sour-
ces were required to have high citation rates, be
published in peer-reviewed outlets, and provide
clearly defined methodologies and results that
could be compared with other studies. The samp-
le has included both domestic and international
research, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of
trends and practices at multiple geographic and
methodological levels.
The literature analysis has revealed a substan-
tial number of studies proposing novel approaches
to energy-efficient building renovation, including
the adoption of innovative materials, technolo-
gies, and energy management strategies. Never-
theless, despite the presence of individual studies,
there remains a clear need to consolidate existing
knowledge and develop integrated organizational
and technological models that encompass all fa-
cets of energy-efficient renovation [24].
To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed so-
lutions, several methods have been applied, most
notably the statistical index comparison method
(INOVA). This method has enabled an objective
comparison of alternative renovation strategies ac-
ross multiple criteria, including energy consump-
tion, implementation costs, and environmental
impact. The use of INOVA has facilitated the as-
sessment of renovation options at the level of all
critical factors, allowing the determination of the
solution with the greatest combined economic and
environmental benefits. Moreover, the application
of such methods has not only supported practical
evaluation but has also informed the prioritiza-
tion of energy-efficient technologies for implemen-
tation within construction enterprises [1, 17].
INOVA analysis in the construction industry is
interpreted as an integrated analytical method for
quantitatively assessing the innovativeness, effi-
ciency and feasibility of implemented technologi-
cal solutions, which combines the principles of
regression modeling, expert evaluation and sys-
tem analysis. In essence, it is not just an evalua-
tion approach, but a generalized mathematical
model that describes the influence of a set of re-
construction parameters on the final result —
economic, energy and environmental effects. In a
narrow mathematical sense, INOVA analysis is
considered as a variant of a multifactor regression
model, where the input variables are technical and
organizational parameters of the reconstruction,
and the output variables are performance indica-
tors, such as energy savings, CO2 emission reduc-
tion, payback period or level of technological
novelty. This approach allows not only recording
statistical dependencies, but also taking into ac-
count the interaction of factors — synergistic, com-
pensatory or risk effects [15].
The INOVA model formalizes the dependence
of the level of energy savings, return on invest-
ment and environmental efficiency on specific
engineering and technological solutions, such as
facade insulation, window replacement, lighting
modernization, automation of control systems or
the use of renewable energy sources. Its differen-
ce from classical regression models lies in the abi-
lity to take into account synergistic effects, when
the simultaneous implementation of several solu-
tions provides a much greater result than the sum
of their individual actions. For example, the com-
bination of high-efficiency insulation and an intel-
ligent microclimate management system provides
additional energy savings that are not apparent
when using each technology separately. Due to this,
the INOVA analysis considers reconstruction as a
holistic system of interconnected factors, where
each element affects the final efficiency, and the
result is a reflection of a complex energy, econo-
mic and organizational balance.
In a broad interpretation, INOVA analysis (from
the English. innovation analysis — innovation
analysis) is a methodological system aimed at de-
termining the level of innovative development of
the reconstruction process. It involves identifying
and comparing positive factors (novelty, adapta-
bility, feasibility, environmental friendliness) and
risks (technological, economic, regulatory) within
102 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
a single integrated index. Unlike classical statis-
tical approaches, INOVA allows not only asses-
sing the re lationship between costs and results,
but also quan titatively measuring the contribu-
tion of each individual solution to increasing the
level of innovation, energy efficiency and sustai-
nability of the facility.
From the standpoint of organizational and tech-
nological management, INOVA analysis is an effec-
tive tool for substantiating decisions in the process
of reconstruction of construction enterprises, as
it combines economic, energy and environmental
indicators in a single evaluation system. This al-
lows predicting the results of the reconstruction
depending on the selected technical parameters,
determining the optimal combination of innova-
tive solutions and minimizing potential risks. In
applied application, the INOVA model plays the
role of a digital simulator capable of reproducing
changes in energy consumption, savings and envi-
ronmental effects depending on the set of moder-
nization measures.
Thus, INOVA analysis can be defined as a me-
thodologically and mathematically grounded me-
thod of systematic assessment of innovative solu-
tions in the process of reconstruction of const-
ruction enterprises. It combines the principles of
multi-criteria optimization, statistical modeling and
a systems approach, providing quantitative mea-
surement of innovativeness in relation to energy ef-
ficiency, payback and environmental sustaina bility.
Its scientific value lies in the creation of a universal
analytical model that makes it possible to compare,
predict and optimize the results of reconstruction
projects, and its practical significance lies in sup-
porting the adoption of strategic management deci-
sions aimed at increasing energy efficiency and
competitiveness of the const ruc tion industry.
Additionally, the research used economic ana-
lysis methods to assess the financial feasibility of
the proposed solutions. In particular, long-term
energy costs, savings on operating costs and a po-
sitive impact on the environment were taken into
account. This allows us to build a model that
combines energy and economic factors and draw
conclusions about the most effective reconstruc-
tion technologies.
The literature sample was carefully selected ac-
cording to several criteria, including relevance,
scientific validity, practical value, as well as the avai-
lability of modern technologies and approaches
to energy conservation and energy efficiency. The
literature selection for the study was carried out
by attracting articles, monographs and scientific
reports that were published in international and
national scholarly research journals. In addition,
studies were selected that contain a comparative
analysis of modern technologies in the field of const-
ruction, in particular in the field of reconstruction
of buildings with energy-efficient components.
Taking into account the specified methods and
sampling requirements, the study allows for a scien-
tifically sound approach to improving organiza-
tional and technological solutions for the reconst-
ruction of construction enterprises, taking into
account energy saving requirements, and to de-
velop recommendations for the implementation
of effective practices in the construction industry.
When developing the target function of energy-
efficient reconstruction of construction enterpri-
ses, taking into account energy saving require-
ments, the first and foremost objective is to ensure
the minimization of total reconstruction costs,
taking into account energy consumption and en-
vironmental impact, which can be mathemati-
cally written as an expression (1):
1 2 2min ( ) ( ) CO ( ) ,total
x X
R C x E x x
(1)
where: x — vector of solutions (types of technolo-
gies, materials, solutions); Ctotal(x) — the cost of re-
construction; E(x) — annual energy consumption;
CO2(x) — greenhouse gas emissions; 1 2, — im-
portance weights.
Then, when developing a multi-criteria resour-
ce planning model, we use the vector utility func-
tion (2):
2( ) ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ) ,U x C x T x E x CO x Q x
(2)
where: T(x) — reconstruction time; Q(x) — ex-
pected quality of energy efficiency (e.g. building
103ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
class A—G); the sign “–” means minimization;
“+” means maximization.
We also apply the weighted coefficient me-
thod (3):
1
( ) ( ),
n
agg i i
i
U x u x
(3)
where: i — weights of criteria; 1i ; ui(x) —
normalized criteria values.
In this case, the energy audit simulation model
takes the following form (4):
1
( ),
m
old new
pot j j j
j
E A U U
(4)
where: Epot — energy saving potential; Aj — area or
volume of the jth zone of the building; ,old new
j jU U —
heat loss coefficients (before/after reconstruction).
For a mathematical description of the mecha-
nism of optimization of the technological se-
quence (cri tical path method taking into account
energy efficiency), we apply the modified critical
path method (5):
min min [max( ) ( )],i i recons
P i
T t d E
(5)
where: — route of technological operations; ti —
start time; di — duration of the operation; Erecons() —
energy consumption during the reconstruction
process; — weighting factor for energy impact.
Accordingly [12] for each element ke
BIM-mo-
dels we have (6):
( , , ),k k k kE f M S C
(6)
where: Mk — material; Sk — area or volume; Ck —
constructive solution (ventilation, insulation, etc.);
f — empirical or simulation function (e.g. Energy-
Plus, or Revit Energy Analysis).
Then the total energy model can be mathemati-
cally written as (7):
1
.
n
total k
k
E E
(7)
As a result, the general solution scheme is re-
duced to the following sequence of actions:
1. Conduct an energy audit → evaluate Epot;
2. Build a BIM model with reconstruction pa-
rameters;
3. Choose a set of organizational and techno-
logical solutions ;x X
4. Optimize function Uagg(x);
5. Model the implementation taking into account
the technological path Epot;
6. Implement with control over the actual E(x).
A mathematical model based on INOVA (reg-
ression) can be written as follows (8):
3 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 ,Y X X X X X
(8)
where: Y3 — annual savings (UAH); X1, …, X5 —
in put parameters; 0, …, 5 — correspondence coef-
ficients of input parameters.
In our case, let’s say we have 5 strategic reconst-
ruction decisions: X1 — facade insulation (mm);
X2 — window replacement (%); X3 — lighting
mo dernization (%); X4 — systems automation
(binary variable 0/1); X5 — renewable sources
(power, kW).
The integral formula of the INOVA index has
the following form (9):
1 1
1 1
,
n m
INOVA i j
i j
I K R
n m
(9)
where: Ki — positivecoefficients (novelty, adapta-
bility, feasibility, environmentalfriendliness, etc.);
Rj — negative risks (technological, economic);
n — positive indicators; m — risks in our case.
Level of technological innovation Kinnov
is cal-
culated according to (10):
max
,
implemented
innov
N
K
N
(10)
where: Nimplemented — the number of new technolo-
gies implemented in the project (for example: ther-
mal insulation, BMS, LED, 3rd class windows,
recuperation); Nmax — the total number of new
technologies that can be implemented.
Level of technological adaptability Kadaptability cal-
culated in accordance with (11):
1 ,
adaptability
adaptability
full
C
K
C
(11)
where: Cadaptability — costs of adapting technologies
for new facilities; Cfull — the full cost of a new imp-
lementation without adaptation (the fewer addi-
tional costs, the higher the coefficient).
104 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
Level of implementation of innovations
Kimplemented
(12):
,done
plann d
impleme
e
nted
T
T
K (12)
where: Tdone — number of successfully implement-
ed innovations; Tplanned — number of innovations
planned for implementation.
Technological risk RTech (13):
,Tech failure influenceR P K (13)
where: Pfailure — probability of technological failu-
re; Kinfluence — coefficient of the impact of the failu re
on the overall system (0—1).
Economic risk Reconomic (14):
( )
,economic
T
R
T
(14)
where: ( )T — standard deviation of rates/pri ce;
T — average tariff value (for example, UAH/kWh)
(determines market instability).
Environmental efficiency Kenvir
(15):
2 2
2
CO CO
CO
,
basic new
envir
basic
E E
K
E
(15)
where:
2CO basicE — CO2 emissions before reconst-
ruction;
2CO newE — CO2 emissions after reconst-
ruction.
Energy effect Eenergy (16):
,basic new
energy
basic
E E
E
E
(16)
where: Ebasic — energy consumption before recon-
struction; Enew — after reconstruction (calculated
separately for kWh and Gcal).
Payback (index) Ppayback (17):
max
1 ,
payback
payback
T
P
T
(17)
where: Tpayback — actual payback period; Tmax —
permissible standard payback period (for examp le,
5 years) (the shorter the payback period, the hig-
her the coefficient).
Innovative synergy Ksynergy (18):
,
comprehend
synergy
i
E
K
E
(18)
where: Ecomprehend — overall effect with comprehend
siveimp lementation; iE — the sum of the ef-
fects of each technology separately (value > 1 in-
dicates positive synergy, normalized to 0—1).
Additionally, in order to understand in more de-
tail the application of improved organizational and
technological solutions in the reconstruction of
construction enterprises taking into account ener-
gy saving requirements, it is important to introdu ce
specific coefficients and indicators that allow for
the analysis and assessment of the effectiveness of
the implementation of such solutions, namely:
Energy efficiency ratio (Kefficiency): a coefficient
reflecting the reduction in energy consumption
due to implemented energy-saving technologies.
It is calculated using the formula (19):
100%,
to after
efficiency
to
E E
K
E
(19)
where: Eto — energy consumption before the imp-
lementation of energy saving measures (in kWh or
Gcal); Eafter — energy consumption after the im-
plementation of energy saving measures (in kWh
or Gcal).
For example, if before the reconstruction the
enterprise consumes 100,000 kWh, and after —
70,000 kWh: Kefficiency = 30%.
This means that energy consumption has de-
creased by 30%.
Energy saving coefficient (Kenergy): This coeffi-
cient reflects the total energy savings resulting
from the implementation of energy efficiency
measures. It can be used to determine the energy
savings for each individual type of energy resour-
ce (heat, electricity, water). It is calculated using
the following formula (20):
100%,
saving
energy
initial
E
K
E
(20)
where: Esaving — energy savings after reconstruc-
tion (in kWh, Gcal); Einitial — initial energy con-
sumption.
Return on investment ratio (Kinvestment): This
coefficient allows estimating the time required
to return the investment spent on implemen-
105ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
ting energy-saving solutions. It is calculated as
follows (21):
,attached
investment
saving energy
I
K
E P
(21)
where: Iattached — total investments in reconstruc-
tion (in UAH); Esaving — annual energy savings (in
kWh or Gcal); Penergy — price of energy resource
(UAH/kWh or UAH/Gcal).
This coefficient allows determining how many
years it takes to return the invested funds.
CO2 Emission Reduction Factor (Kemission): An im-
portant factor that assesses the reduction in carbon
dioxide emissions due to implemented energy-ef-
ficient solutions. This is an important indicator
for companies that strive to meet environmental
standards. The calculation is carried out according
to the formula (22):
Kemission 100%,
to after
to
V V
V
(22)
where: Vto is CO2 emissions before reconstruction
(in tons per year); Vafter is CO2 emissions after re-
novation (in tons per year). Emissions can be es ti-
mated based on energy consumption (for examp-
le, how much CO2 is emitted when consuming
1 kWh of electricity).
Comfort Improvement Factor (Kk): This is a fac-
tor that shows how changes related to energy-effi-
cient technologies affect the internal comfort of a
building. It is usually determined by surveying
employees or residents of a building regarding
their satisfaction with comfort. This factor can be
calculated using a rating scale (from 0 to 10), whe-
re 10 is the maximum level of comfort.
Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the cal-
culation example of the analysis of the reconst-
ruc tion of a selected construction enterprise.
Table 1 shows that different objects of the const-
ruction company have significant differences in
area, type of enclosing structures, state of insula-
tion and level of energy consumption. The admi-
nistrative building with an area of 600 m² has brick
walls with double-glazed windows, but the insula-
tion is assessed as unsatisfactory, which is accom-
panied by moderate consumption of electricity
(38,000 kWh per year) and heat (95 Gcal per year).
The production workshop is much larger in area
(1,200 m²), has metal fences with double-glazed
windows, also with unsatisfactory insulation, but
its consumption of electricity (95,000 kWh) and
heat (180 Gcal) is the highest among all objects.
The warehouse with an area of 900 m² is satisfacto-
rily insulated and built of sandwich panels, which
ensures relatively low consumption of electricity
(40,000 kWh) and heat (60 Gcal). Thus, the table
illustrates that the state of insulation and the type
of enclosures directly affect the level of energy con-
sumption, and this should be taken into account
when planning reconstruction to increase the en-
ergy efficiency of buildings.
In turn, it should be noted that the analysis of
the main characteristics of the enterprise’s facili-
ties, such as area, type of enclosures, state of insu-
lation, as well as electricity and heat consumption,
shows a significant impact of the quality of insu-
lation on energy consumption. In particular, an
administrative building and a production work-
shop with an unsatisfactory state of insulation have
Table 1. Main Characteristics of the Reconstruction of a Selected Construction Enterprise
Object
Area,
m²
Type of fences
Insulation
condition
Electricity
consumption,
kWh/year
Heat
consumption,
Gcal/year
Administrative building (AB) 600 Brick, double-glazed windows Unsatisfactory 38 000 95
Production workshop 1200 Metal + double-glazed windows Unsatisfactory 95 000 180
Composition 900 Sandwich panels Satisfactory 40 000 60
106 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
significantly higher energy consumption rates com-
pared to a warehouse with satisfactory insulation.
The production workshop, which consumes the lar-
gest amount of electricity and heat, stands out in
particular, which indicates the need for priority
implementation of reconstruction measures for
such facilities. The use of modern thermal insula-
tion materials and structures, as in the case of a
warehouse with sandwich panels, demonstrates ef-
fectiveness in reducing energy consumption. Thus,
a comprehensive approach to modernization, inc-
luding the renewal of enclosing structures, impro-
ved insulation and the introduction of energy-
saving technologies, is key to achieving energy
efficiency requirements. The calculation example
given in the table serves as a practical basis for
selecting priority organizational and technologi-
cal solutions and planning further investments in
the reconstruction of construction enterprises.
In our case, the strategic directions for impro-
ving organizational and technological solutions for
the reconstruction of construction enterprises ta-
king into account energy saving requirements in-
clude a number of key aspects that provide a sys-
tematic and effective approach to increasing ener gy
efficiency. The first direction is to conduct an ener-
gy audit before the start of reconstruction, which
allows identifying the main energy losses and bott-
lenecks in existing structures and building systems.
This creates a solid basis for making informed
decisions about further measures, which signifi-
cantly improves the quality of planning. The second
direction involves the integration of BIM (Building
Information Modeling) technology with energy
modeling, which combines a three-dimensional
model of the building with accurate calculations
of its energy efficiency. This approach allows opti-
mizing design solutions and reducing reconstruc-
tion costs due to the ability to visualize and simula-
te energy consumption at the early stages. The third
important direction is the introduction of modu-
larity of organizational and technological solutions,
which consists in the unification of structural and
technological blocks for quick and flexible reconst-
ruction. Which in turn ensures the scalability of
processes, adaptability to different types of objects
and allows quickly responding to changes in con-
ditions or requirements. The fourth direction fo-
cuses on optimizing energy systems by introduc-
ing renewable energy sources, improving thermal
insulation and using modern heating, ventilation
and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. Thanks to
this, significant energy savings can be achieved,
which can reach up to 40%, which significantly
reduces operating costs and environmental im-
pact. Finally, the fifth direction is the use of multi-
criteria resource planning, which allows minimi-
zing not only costs and energy consumption, but
also the project implementation time and carbon
footprint. Such a balance between economy and
efficiency contributes to the sustainable develop-
ment of a construction company and meets mo-
dern environmental and economic requirements.
All these strategic directions form a comprehen-
sive approach that provides not only technical
modernization, but also organizational efficiency
in the reconstruction process, taking into account
energy saving requirements.
In Table 2, the planned energy-saving measu-
res for the reconstruction of the selected const-
ruction enterprise are presented.
Table 2 shows that several energy-saving mea-
sures have been planned for the reconstruction of
the construction enterprise, each is aimed at redu-
cing electricity and heat consumption in various
facilities of the enterprise. Thus, insulation of the
facade of the administrative building with mine-
ral wool with plaster provides for a significant re-
duction in heat loss of up to 35%, while electricity
consumption is expected to decrease by 5%. Re-
placement of windows with more modern three-
chamber PVC is also planned in the administra-
tive building, which provides a reduction in heat
load by 20% and a slight reduction in electricity
consumption by 2%. Installation of LED lighting
in the administrative building, production work-
shop and warehouse provides a significant reduc-
tion in electricity consumption by 20%, while there
is no impact on heat supply. Implementation of re-
cuperative ventilation in the administrative buil-
107ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
ding and workshop simultaneously reduces elect-
ricity consumption by 10% and heat by 15%. Re-
placement of boilers with condensing ones is
planned for the production workshop, which pro-
vides 25% savings in thermal energy without chan-
ging electricity consumption. Finally, the imple-
mentation of an intelligent lighting and heating
control system at all facilities of the enterprise cont-
ributes to an additional reduction in both elect-
ricity and heat by 8%. Thus, a set of these measu res
should ensure a significant increase in the energy
efficiency of the enterprise due to a multifaceted
approach to optimizing energy consumption. The
energy-saving solutions proposed in Table 2 are
directly related to the improvement of organiza-
tional and technological solutions for the reconst-
ruction of construction enterprises, since they
comprehensively take into account both technical
and managerial aspects of increasing energy effi-
ciency. The implementation of facade insulation,
replacement of windows and boilers, updating ligh-
ting and ventilation are technological measures
that change the design and engineering solutions
of the enterprise’s facilities, aimed at reducing en-
ergy consumption. At the same time, the use of
in telligent lighting and heating control systems
reflects an organizational approach that provides
automation of control and optimization of energy
consumption in real time. Such a synergistic app-
roach allows not only increasing the efficiency of
energy resources, but also optimizing energy con-
sumption management, which meets modern re-
quirements for energy saving and sustainable de-
velopment of construction enterprises. Thus, these
solutions are an integral part of a comprehensive
system for improving reconstruction, where orga-
nizational and technological components are integ-
rated to achieve the maximum energy saving effect.
Table 3 presents the results of the design calcu-
lation of changes in energy consumption of a const-
ruction enterprise after reconstruction based on
the proposed solutions.
Table 3 shows that after implementing the pro-
posed energy-saving measures, the construction
Table 2. Planned Energy-Saving Measures for the Reconstruction of the Selected Construction Enterprise
Measure Object
Cost,
thousand
UAH
Expected reduction
in electricity
consumption, %
Reduction
in heat con-
sumption, %
Facade insulation (mineral wool + plaster) AB 420 5 35
Replacing windows with 3-chamber PVC AB 250 2 20
Installing LED lighting AB, workshop Composition 310 20 —
Heat recovery ventilation AB, workshop 680 10 15
Replacing boilers with condensing ones Workshop 450 — 25
Intelligent lighting and heating control system AB, workshop Composition 500 8 8
Table 3. Results of the Design Calculation of Changes in Energy Consumption
of a Construction Enterprise After Reconstruction Based on the Proposed Solutions
Object Electricity up to, kWh Decrease, % Electricity aft er, kWh Heat to, Gcal Decrease, % Warmth aft er
AB 38 000 35 24 700 95 53 44.65
Workshop 95 000 30 66 500 180 40 108.00
Composition 40 000 25 30 000 60 10 54.00
Together 173 000 — 121 200 335 — 206.65
108 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
company will significantly reduce the consump-
tion of both electricity and heat. In particular, the
administrative building will reduce electricity con-
sumption by 35%, which leads to a decrease from
38,000 to 24,700 kWh, and heat consumption by
53%, reducing its costs from 95 to 44,65 Gcal. The
production workshop will reduce electricity con-
sumption by 30%, reducing its volume from
95,000 to 66,500 kWh, and heat consumption by
40%, from 180 to 108 Gcal. For the warehouse, a
reduction in electricity consumption by 25%, from
40,000 to 30,000 kWh, and a reduction in heat con-
sumption by 10%, from 60 to 54 Gcal. As a re sult,
the total electricity consumption at the enterprise
will decrease from 173,000 to 121,200 kWh, and
heat consumption from 335 to 206,65 Gcal. These
indicators indicate the effectiveness of the applied
energy-saving solutions, which provide signifi-
cant energy savings, which has a positive effect on
reducing operating costs and increasing the envi-
ronmental sustainability of the enterprise. Based
on the data in Table 3, the feasibility of strategic
decisions on the reconstruction of the construc-
tion enterprise is confirmed by a significant re-
duction in energy consumption after the imple-
mentation of the proposed measures (Fig. 1).
There is a significant reduction in electricity con-
sumption by 30—35% for the administrative buil-
ding and production workshop, as well as by 25%
for the warehouse, which in total provides a total
reduction in the enterprise’s electricity consump-
tion by more than 30%. Similarly, heat consump-
tion decreases from 10% in the warehouse to over
50% in the administrative building, which indi-
cates the effectiveness of the application of energy-
saving technologies in various types of buildings.
In general, the implementation of these measures
leads to a reduction in the total energy consump-
tion of the enterprise by approximately 30%, which
confirms the economic and environmental feasi-
bility of strategic decisions. This allows not only
reducing operating costs, but also raising the ener-
gy efficiency, which is a key factor for the sustai-
nable development of construction enterprises in
modern conditions. It should be noted that the
feasibility of strategic decisions on the reconst ruc-
tion of construction enterprises lies in their comp-
rehensive and systematic approach to increasing
energy efficiency, which takes into account both
technical and organizational aspects. The imple-
mentation of such decisions allows not only a sig-
nificantly reduction in electricity and heat con-
sumption, which is confirmed by design estima-
tess, but also optimization of the reconstruction
process through the use of modern technologies,
such as BIM modeling and intelligent management
systems. In addition, strategic directions that pro-
vide for modular solutions and multi-criteria re-
source planning provide flexibility, scalability and
a balance between economic costs and environ-
mental efficiency. Thus, the implementation of
the se strategic measures is justified and beneficial
both from the point of view of reducing operating
costs and from the point of view of long-term
100000
0
20000
AB Workshop
Electricity up to, kWh
Composition
40000
60000
38000
24700
95000
66500
40000
30000
80000
El
ec
tr
ic
ity
, k
W
h
Electricity aer, kWh
Fig.1. Results of the design calculation of changes in energy consumption of a construc-
tion enterprise after reconstruction based on the proposed solutions
109ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
sustainable development of the enterprise, which
meets modern requirements for energy saving and
environmental safety. Table 4 shows the input va-
riables for INOVA analysis, regarding the feasibi li ty
of changes in the energy consumption of a const-
ruction enterprise after reconstruction based on
the proposed solutions.
From Table 4 it can be seen that for the INOVA
analysis of the feasibility of changes in the energy
consumption of a construction enterprise after
reconstruction, both categorical and quantitative
input variables are used. Categorical parameters
include the type of facade insulation, which may
be absent or made of mineral wool or polystyrene
foam, the type of windows, which varies from old
to modern three-chamber, as well as the type of
heating — from old boilers to condensing ones.
Additionally, two binary variables are taken into
account — the presence of LED lighting and con-
trol automation, which may be either absent or
implemented. The results of the analysis are quan-
titative indicators — electricity and heat after re-
construction, as well as total savings in hryvnias
per year. Such a set of variables allows for a comp-
rehensive assessment of the impact of various
technical and organizational solutions on the ener-
gy consumption of the enterprise, which is im-
portant for making informed strategic decisions
in the reconstruction process taking into account
energy saving requirements.
In Table 5 the results of the implementation of
a detailed INOVA analysis of energy-efficient re-
construction of the enterprise are presented.
From Table 5, it is evident that the detailed
INOVA analysis of the energy-efficient reconst ruc-
tion of the construction enterprise demonstrates
high indicators for the implementation of inno-
vative solutions. The level of technological novelty
received a score of 0.78, indicating the use of mo-
dern thermal insulation materials with low ther-
mal conductivity, energy-efficient LED lighting, and
a building management system (BMS). An impor-
tant advantage is the high level of technological
adaptability (0.82), which points to the possibility
of scaling energy management to other divisions
of the enterprise without requiring significant
structural changes. The innovation implementa-
tion level reached 0.85, confirming full complian-
ce of the implemented measures with design and
estimate documentation and ensuring the safe
operation of new systems.
Regarding risks, the technological risk is asses-
sed as low 0.12, meaning a minimal likelihood of
failures in the control system under critical con-
ditions. The economic risk stands at 0.18, consi-
dering potential changes in tariffs and maintenan-
ce costs, reflecting balanced planning of the pro-
ject payback period. The project’s environmental
efficiency is also significant, with a score of 0.76,
due to a substantial reduction in CO2 emissions
Table 4. Input Variables for INOVA Analysis of Energy Consumption Feasibility
in Construction Companies Following Reconstruction Based on Proposed Solutions
Parameter Marking Type Description
Type of facade insulation X1 Categorical 0 — none, 1 — mineral wool,
2 — polystyrene foam
Type of windows X2 Categorical 0 — old, 1—2-chamber, 2—3-chamber
LED lighting X3 Binary 0 — no, 1 — yes
Management automation X4 Binary 0 — no, 1 — yes
Heating type X5 Categorical 0 — old boilers, 1 — condensing boilers
Energy consumption aft er reconstruction Y1 Quantitative Electricity, kWh
Heat consumption aft er reconstruction Y2 Quantitative Heat, Gcal
Total savings Y3 Quantitative UAH/year
110 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
by 32 tons per year and decreased consumption
of fossil energy resources. The energy effect recei-
ved a high score of 0.88, reflecting savings of up
to 40% in electricity and about 39% in heat, which
is a considerable contribution to improving the
enterprise’s energy efficiency.
The project payback period is 3.6 years, which
falls within the normative range for building comp-
lexes and confirms the economic feasibility of the
reconstruction. An important aspect is the inno-
vation synergy (0.79), which characterizes the
mutual reinforcement of effects from combining
various measuresfacade insulation, automation,
and the implementation of renewable energy sour-
ces. The overall INOVA index of 0.81 indicates
the successful comprehensive implementation of
energy-saving solutions, considering positive in-
dicators and controlled risks, ensuring strategic
efficiency and sustainable development of the const-
ruction enterprise.
The obtained results clearly confirmed that the
improvement of organizational and technologi-
cal solutions for building reconstruction is based
on the comprehensive application of key coeffi-
cients, which allow for the assessment of the effec-
tiveness and feasibility of the implemented mea-
sures. First and foremost, determining energy effi-
ciency is fundamental to evaluating reconstruction
outcomes: energy efficiency and energy savings
coefficients provide quantitative measurements
of the reduction in electricity and heat consump-
tion, which directly influences the reduction in the
energy costs [1, 16]. This type of analysis enables
the monitoring of actual outcomes of energy-sa-
ving initiatives and the adjustment of further ac-
tions accordingly.
Table 5. Results of the Implementation of a Detailed INOVA Analysis
of Energy-Efficient Reconstruction of the Enterprise
INOVA-variable Marking
Rating
(0—1)
Evaluation methodology / comments
Level of technologi-
cal innovation
Kinnov 0.78 Introduction of modern thermal insulation materials (with λ ≤ 0.032 W/m · K),
energy-effi cient LED lighting, BMS management system
Level of technologi-
cal adaptability
Kadaptability 0.82 Th e ability to scale energy management systems to other divisions of the
enterprise without additional design changes
Level of innovation
implementation
Kimplemented 0.85 All elements of the innovation have been implemented in accordance
with the design and estimate documentation, and safe operation has been
tested.
Technological risk Rtech 0.12 Possible BMS failures at critical temperature conditions; assessed as low
technological risk
Economic risk Reconomic 0.18 Risk of changes in tariff s or service costs; taken into account in the pay-
back period
Environmental
effi ciency
Kenvironmental 0.76 Reduction in CO2 by 32 t/year (estimate according to IPCC 2006 methodo-
logy); reduction in fossil resource use
Energy eff ect Eenergy 0.88 Energy savings: — 40% (electricity), — 39% (heat); calculated relative to
baseline consumption
Payback Ppayback 0.81 Payback period 3.6 years → within the regulatory period for the construc-
tion complex
Innovative synergy Ksynergy 0.79 Mutual reinforcement of the eff ect of combining thermal insulation, auto-
mation and renewable sources
Overall INOVA
index
IINOVA 0.81 Calculation by the formula:
1 1
1 1
,
n m
i ji j
I K R
n m
where n = 7 positive
indicators, m = 2 risks
111ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
At the same time, financial feasibility is the next
crucial aspect. The investment payback coefficient
helps the enterprise determine the period over
which the invested funds are returned through
energy cost savings. This is critically important
for making informed managerial decisions and
budgeting, as it justifies investments in modern
technologies by considering their economic be ne-
fi ts in the medium term.
Meanwhile, environmental responsibility in the
reconstruction process is reflected through the CO2
emission reduction coefficient. This indicator is key
for enterprises aiming to minimize their environ-
mental impact and comply with sustainable deve-
lopment requirements. Assessing environmental
benefits not only enhances a company’s social re-
sponsibility but is also often mandated by regulato-
ry documents and international standards [14, 19].
In addition, improving comfort in renovated
pre mises is an important social factor, evaluated
through a corresponding coefficient. Enhancing
working or living conditions and ensuring a com-
fortable indoor climate positively affects employee
productivity and overall user satisfaction, which is
also a vital component of successful reconstruction.
Based on the analysis of these coefficients, a stra-
tegy for further reconstruction is developed, allo-
wing for the integration of energy-saving solutions
that consider financial, environmental, and social
factors. This approach ensures a balance between
economic benefit, energy efficiency, environmental
sustainability, and comfort, collectively increasing
the overall effectiveness of the construction enter-
prise and contributing to sustainable development.
Thus, these coefficients serve as a comprehensive
tool for assessing and managing the reconstruction
process, helping to choose the best organizational
and technological solutions for each specific project.
These findings align with current research in the
field of energy-efficient building reconstruction,
which confirms the importance of a comprehen-
sive approach to assessing energy consumption,
economic efficiency, and environmental responsi-
bility. Scientific studies demonstrate that the use of
integrated methodssuch as BIM modeling, auto-
mated energy management, and the implementa-
tion of renewable energy sourcessignificantly in-
creases the overall effectiveness of reconstruction
projects. Moreover, research highlights the neces-
sity of considering social aspects, particularly imp-
roved comfort, which has a positive impact on
staff productivity and motivation.
The proposed coefficients and approaches not
only correspond to best practices and current
trends but are also supported by empirical data
from various scientific sources, making their app-
lication well-justified and appropriate for the prac-
tical implementation of reconstruction in const-
ruction enterprises with regard to energy-saving
requirements.
In particular, the research has yielded important
results that allow for conclusions about improving
the organizational and technological solutions of
construction enterprise reconstruction under ener-
gy efficiency demands. The primary objective was
to identify and analyze the effectiveness of using
energy-efficient technologies and materials in the
reconstruction process, as well as to assess the eco-
nomic impact of such changes in the construction
sector. A general review of the literature revealed
that while there is a significant volume of studies
related to energy efficiency in construction, comp-
rehensive research on organizational and techno-
logical solutions for reconstruction that incorpo-
rates such requirements remains insufficient [16].
The results showed that current approaches re-
quire the integration of advanced energy-saving
technologies, along with the adaptation of const-
ruction enterprises to sustainable development and
energy efficiency conditions.
By applying the INOVA method to compare
different building reconstruction scenarios, it was
found that the use of energy-efficient materials
and technologies significantly reduces energy con-
sumption costs in buildings. At the same time, the
economic effect of these changes not only results
in substantial long-term cost savings but also cont-
ributes positively to the environmental situation.
One of the key findings is that reducing energy
consumption during building reconstruction can
112 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
be achieved through technologies such as advan-
ced thermal insulation materials, replacement of
windows with energy-saving alternatives, and op-
timization of heating and air conditioning sys-
tems. This was confirmed by comparing energy
consumption indicators before and after the re-
construction.
Improving organizational and technological so-
lutions for the reconstruction of construction en-
terprises with consideration of energy-saving re-
quirements is a crucial step toward sustainable
development and enhancing efficiency in the const-
ruction industry. The implementation of energy-
efficient technologies and materials holds signifi-
cant potential to transform both the economic
and environmental aspects of reconstruction, in-
crease performance, reduce energy costs, and les-
sen environmental impact.
Impact on Organizational and Technological
Solutions:
1. Process Optimization and Cost Reduction: The
implementation of energy-efficient technologies
and materials in the reconstruction process not
only reduces energy consumption but also optimi-
zes the overall technological workflow. For examp-
le, using advanced materials such as thermal in-
sulation systems or energy-efficient lighting re-
duces the need for large amounts of energy for
heating, cooling, and lighting. This, in turn, signi-
ficantly decreases long-term operational costs. Such
optimization lays the foundation for reducing not
only energy consumption but also the overall costs
across all stages of reconstruction from planning
and procurement to final usage.
2. Improved Economic Efficiency: A key result
of enhanced solutions is cost savings on energy
resources. Due to increased energy efficiency, en-
terprises can lower their energy consumption,
leading to reduced operational expenditures. The
difference between initial and post-reconstruc-
tion energy costs can be substantial. Calculating
the investment payback ratio makes it possible to
accurately determine the return period of invest-
ments in energy-saving measures. This is essen-
tial for making informed investment decisions.
3. Enhanced Environmental Responsibility of
the Enterprise: In the process of reconstructing
construction enterprises with a focus on energy
efficiency, reducing CO2 and other harmful emis-
sions becomes a critical factor. This not only be-
ne fits the environment but also improves the
enterp rise’s reputation with regulatory bodies and
consu mers. In many cases, compliance with envi-
ronmental standards becomes a key factor for
market competitiveness, increasing the chances
of obtaining government or EU subsidies for the
implementation of such solutions.
4. Increased Comfort for Employees and Users:
Enhancing organizational and technological so-
lutions in reconstruction also significantly im-
proves comfort levels for building occupants and
company employees. For example, the use of en-
ergy-efficient ventilation and air conditioning
systems, along with smart lighting and tempera-
ture control systems, can create more comfort-
able indoor environments. This contributes to
higher productivity and overall satisfaction with
the working or living space.
5. Modernization of Construction Processes:
Energy efficiency necessitates a rethinking and
improvement of construction technologies them-
selves. New technologies and materials that im-
prove energy performance can lead to the devel-
opment of new construction processes and meth-
ods. For instance, using prefabricated elements
with high energy-saving characteristics can re-
duce construction time while improving the
quality and durability of buildings.
6. Increased Investment Attractiveness: Recon-
struction projects that integrate energy-saving
measures make enterprises more appealing to in-
vestors, as improved energy efficiency often en-
hances long-term profitability. Savings on energy
costs can be redirected toward other areas of
business development, further increasing com-
petitiveness.
7. Compliance with New Standards and Regu-
lations: Improving organizational and technolog-
ical solutions in line with energy-saving require-
ments provides the opportunity to meet evolving
113ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
standards and regulations particularly within the
European Union, where energy efficiency is a ma-
jor component of sustainable development strate-
gies. This enables construction enterprises not
only to comply with current requirements but
also to actively shape the development of new
construction standards and regulations.
As a result, the improvement of organizational
and technological solutions for the reconstruction
of construction enterprises, considering energy ef-
ficiency requirements, leads to comprehensive en-
hancements in multiple areas. These include cost
reduction, increased environmental responsibility,
improved comfort, and greater investment appeal.
Achieving these benefits requires a systematic app-
roach to the implementation of energy-saving tech-
nologies, their integration into existing construc-
tion processes, and ongoing monitoring of results
to ensure maximum effectiveness.
Scientific novelty and practical value of analy-
tical, theoretical and methodological framework
presented in the article: the results of the con-
ducted research allow us to comprehensively as-
sess the analytical, theoretical and methodologi-
cal significance of the work aimed at improving
organizational and technological solutions for the
reconstruction of construction enterprises, taking
into account the requirements of energy saving.
The content of the article reflects a holistic concept
of the transition to system management of ener gy
modernization processes, which combines tech-
nical, economic, environmental and organiza-
tional aspects.
Analytical novelty: the study has examined the
current state of the issues of reconstruction of con-
struction enterprises based on the generalization
of domestic and foreign scholarly research works
for 2020—2025. It has been determined that the
exis ting approaches are fragmentary and do not
provide a comprehensive combination of energy,
eco nomic and management indicators. On this
basis, an integrated analytical model that summa-
rizes the key trends in the development of energy-
sa ving technologies, digitalization of management
and environmental safety has been proposed.
It has been found that the lack of unified me-
thods for assessing the energy efficiency of reconst-
ruction measures and the insufficient integration
of digital tools, such as BIM modeling or digital
twins, are constraining factors in increasing the
efficiency of the construction sector. Therefore,
the conducted study has an analytical novelty in
determining the interdependencies between the
energy characteristics of objects, organizational
decisions and financial results of reconstruction.
Theoretical novelty: within the framework of the
study, an energy-efficient reconstruction target
function has been developed. It mathematically
combines the minimization of the cost of work,
energy consumption and greenhouse gas emis-
sions with the maximization of energy efficiency
and environmental friendliness. For the first time,
a vector utility function was constructed, which
allows us to consider reconstruction as a multi-cri-
teria process, where weighting factors determine
the balance between economic feasibility, energy
sustainability and technological adaptability.
The theoretical significance also includes the
modification of the critical path method, which is
supplemented with energy parameters, which ma-
kes it possible to optimize the technological sequen-
ce of works, taking into account energy consump-
tion at each stage of reconstruction. The proposed
scheme provides not only a reduction in imple-
mentation time, but also a reduction in energy
losses, which corresponds to modern principles
of sustainable construction.
Methodological novelty: the methodological
novelty is the creation of an integrated system for
assessing the effectiveness of reconstruction ba sed
on INOVA analysis, which combines index, reg-
ression and multi-criteria approaches. The propo-
sed methodology allows quantitatively assessing
the level of technological novelty, adaptability, fea-
sibility, environmental efficiency, energy effect,
payback and innovation synergy, and also takes
into account technological and economic risks.
The modeling results have shown that the over-
all INOVA index of reconstruction is 0.81, which
indicates a high level of innovation, managed risks
114 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
and feasibility of the implemented energy-saving
technologies. This approach provides the ability to
predict the effectiveness of reconstruction mea-
sures at the design stage, which is a significant
methodological shift compared to traditional app-
roaches to assessing effectiveness.
Practical value of the study: the practical re-
sults have confirmed that the implementation of
the developed system provides a tangible econo-
mic and environmental effect. In particular, using
the example of a typical construction company, it
was established:
reduction in electricity consumption by 30—
35% (from 173,000 to 121,200 kWh);
reduction in heat losses by 40—50% (from 335
to 206,65 Gcal);
reduction in CO2 emissions by 32 t/year;
achievement of a payback period of 3.6 years,
which corresponds to the normative indicators
of ISO 50001 and Directive 2010/31/EU.
The application of energy-saving measures, inc-
luding façade insulation, recuperative ventilation,
LED lighting, and intelligent control systems, has
demonstrated the effectiveness of a synergistic
approach to reconstruction. The practical signifi-
cance lies in the fact that the methodology can be
directly applied to the development of energy
passports for reconstruction, as well as to the for-
mulation of regulatory and methodological recom-
mendations and strategies for the sustainable de-
velopment of construction enterprises.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The conducted study has highlighted the scienti-
fic novelty in constructing a mathematically for-
malized system for evaluating the energy efficien-
cy of reconstruction projects, the methodological
value in implementing the index-criteria model
of INOVA analysis, and the practical significance
in confirming the potential for reducing energy
consumption and enhancing the environmental
sustainability of construction enterprises.
The obtained results align with international
stan dards for sustainable construction, and the pro-
posed methodology can serve as a foundation for
further development of national standards, in dustry
regulations, and energy modernization manage-
ment tools within Ukraine’s construction sector.
As a result of this research, it has been estab-
lished that improving organizational and techno-
logical solutions for the reconstruction of const-
ruction enterprises, while considering energy ef-
ficiency requirements, represents a strategically
im portant task that integrates technical, economic,
environmental, and managerial dimensions. A
comp rehensive approach, incorporating energy
audits, the application of BIM technologies, multi-
criteria planning, the use of innovative materials,
and digital management systems, enables substan-
tial reductions in energy consumption, green-
house gas emissions, and operational costs, while
simultaneously enhancing building comfort.
The results of project modeling and INOVA
analysis have confirmed the effectiveness of the
proposed measures, particularly demonstrating
up to 40% savings in electricity and thermal ener-
gy, a reduction in CO2 emissions by several tens
of tons annually, and investment payback within
standard regulatory periods. Importantly, the imp-
le mentation of such solutions contributes to alig-
ning Ukraine’s construction sector with internatio-
nal environmental and energy efficiency standards,
supporting the transition toward sustainable de-
velopment and energy independence.
Consequently, the study has substantiated both
the necessity and feasibility of integrating modern
energy-efficient solutions into the reconstruction
processes of construction enterprises at both scien-
tific and practical levels.
REFERENCES
1. Hoi, V. V. (2024). Intelligent Economic System of Construction Enterprises: Analytical and Practical Aspects.
Scientific Works of the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Economic Sciences, 2(74), 25—30. https://
doi.org/10.32689/2523-4536/74-3
115ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Improvement of Organizational and Technological Solutions for the Modernization
2. Dymchenko, O., Raina, D. (2021). Features of the Competitiveness of Construction Enterprises in Ukraine.
InterConf., 78, 7—16. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.7-8.10.2021.001 [in Ukraine].
3. Dmytrenko, A. (2023). Organizational and Economic Support for the Development of Construction Enterpri-
ses. Sci ence and Technology Today, 11(25), 267—273. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2023-11(25)-267-273
[in Ukrai ne].
4. Palamarchuk, O., Petryshyna, S. (2023). Analysis of Factors of Competitiveness of Construction Enterprises of
Ukraine. Economy and Society, 57, 7—10. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-57-99 [in Ukraine].
5. Sadoviak, M. (2024). Essential Characteristics of Material and Technical Support of Construction Enterprises. Eco-
nomy and Society, 69. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-69-95
6. Serediuk, K. (2024). Social Guarantees in the Corporate Responsibility System of Construction Enterprises:
Economic Mechanism of Provision. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University, 3(99), 10—14. https://doi.
org/10.32782/bsnau.2024.3.2
7. Seriohina, N. V., Khadzhikova, O. P. (2024). Supporting the Efficiency of Construction Enterprises in Unstable
Conditions. Efficient Economy, 2. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2024.2.75
8. Mamonov, K., Hoi, V., Kovalenko, L., Dmytrenko, A. (2023). Modern Tools for Ensuring the Development of
Construction Enterprises. Scientific Innovations and Advanced Technologies, 12(26), 385—394. https://doi.org/
10.52058/2786-5274-2023-12(26)-385-394
9. Yakushev, O. V., Bilan, Ye. V. (2024). Features of Managing the Activities of Construction Enterprises in a Post-Conf-
lict Economy. Economics and Organization of Management, 2, 134—142. https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2024.2.12
10. Zhou, Z., Su, Y., Zheng, Zh., Wang, Yi. (2023). Analysis of factors of willingness to adopt intelligent construc-
tion tech no logy in high way construction enterprises. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 19339. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41598-023-46241-6
11. Pavelko, O., Lazaryshyna, I., Dukhnovska, L., Sharova, S., Oliіnyk T., Donenko, I. (2021). Construction deve-
lop ment and its impact on the construction enterprises financial results. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(3).
https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i3.4719
12. Mamonov, K., Prunenko, D., Hoi, V., Kovalenko, L. (2023). Defining the development of construction enterprises:
Theoretical provisions. Collection of Scientific Research Papers of the State University of Infrastructure and Technolo-
gies. Section “Economics and Management,” 54, 63—71. https://doi.org/10.32703/2664-2964-2023-54-63-71
13. Khrustalev, B., Chudaikina, T., Kargin, A., Agapova, M., Belyakov, A. (2023). Development features of integ ra-
ted risk management system at construction enterprises. E3S Web of Conferences, 403, 02009. https://doi.org/
10.1051/e3sconf/202340302009
14. Nguyen, X. H., Khanh Linh Nguyen, K. L. N., Nguyen, T. V. H., Nguyen, T. T. H. (2023). Driving factors for
green innovation in Vietnamese construction enterprises. International Journal of Professional Business Review,
8(6), e02356. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.2356
15. Dubinin, D. (2023). Digital transformation of Ukrainian construction and project enterprises: Obstacles and
opportunities. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 56, 131—137. https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-
9933.2023.56.131-137
16. Zhang, T., Wang, H., Gao, Z., Zhang, A. (2023). Internal risk management analysis of brand construction of time-
honored enterprises. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 7(3), 108—109. https://doi.org/10.
54097/fbem.v7i3.5401
17. Kang, Z., Du, W., Tian, T. (2023). The reconstruction scheme of inland port shore power construction. Journal
of Physics: Conference Series, 2520(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2520/1/012022
18. Kolodyazhna, T., Vinnychenko, O. (2023). Integration of construction enterprises as a factor increasing their
competitiveness. Market Infrastructure, 72. https://doi.org/10.32782/infrastruct72-16
19. Kondratiuk, Y. (2021). Strategic management of development of construction enterprises. Business Navigator,
2(63), 7—11. https://doi.org/10.32847/business-navigator.63-1
20. Madyda, A. (2023). Risk management of construction enterprises — theoretical approach. Communications of
International Proceedings, 2023(4), Article ID 4115423. https://doi.org/10.5171/2023.4115423
21. Myrczek, J., Tworek, P. (2023). Risk management standardisation in Polish construction enterprises under un-
certainty. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 184, 328—345.
https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.184.16
116 ISSN 2409-9066. Sci. innov. 2026. 22(3)
Pidodnia, O. H., Dvornichenko, A. D., Danylova, T. V., Nechepurenko, D. S., and Kravchunovska, T. S.
22. Ozdamirova, L. (2023). Information construction of financial management at production enterprises. SHS Web
of Conferences, 172, 02019. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317202019
23. Zhang Wei1, Ding Zhaohui, Yang Guoyu, Xiong Zhonghao. (2021). Research on intelligent construction of
hydropower enterprises. E3S Web of Conferences, 276, 01005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127601005
24. Wen, Q., Kong, F. (2023). Research on the key path of green construction implemented by multi-subject coope-
ration in construction enterprises. Journal of Industry and Engineering Management, 1(1), 70—76. https://doi.
org/10.62517/jiem.202303110
Received 29.07.2025
Revised 28.10.2025
Accepted 25.12.2025
О.Г. Підодня (https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2156-0682),
А.Д. Дворніченко (https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0287-4989),
Т.В. Данилова (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-0154),
Д.С. Нечепуренко (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-4790),
Т.С. Кравчуновська (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-8995)
Український державний університет науки і технологій,
ННІ «Придніпровська державна академія будівництва та архітектури»,
вул. Архітектора Олега Петрова, 24-а, Дніпро, 49005, Україна,
+380 95 855 2063, prkom@pdaba.edu.ua
УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ
БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ
Вступ. Одним із визначальних чинників формування напрямів розвитку будівельної інфраструктури є
зростання рівня енергоефективності підприємств, що розглядається як необхідна умова сталого розвитку,
забезпечення екологічної та економічної безпеки, інтеграції до європейського енергетичного простору і
становлення енергонезалежної національної економіки.
Проблематика. Актуальним є удосконалення організаційно-технологічних рішень реконструкції буді-
вельних підприємств в умовах зростання вимог до енергоефективності, екологічної безпеки, що зумовлює
потребу пошуку науково обґрунтованих підходів до їх модернізації.
Мета. Розроблення та наукове обґрунтування ефективних організаційно-технологічних рішень рекон-
струкції будівельних підприємств з урахуванням сучасних вимог до енергоефективності, екологічної без-
пеки й економічної доцільності, спрямованих на підвищення їхньої конкурентоспроможності та забез-
печення сталого розвитку.
Матеріали й методи. Застосовано системний та порівняльний аналіз наукових джерел за 2020—2025 рр.,
моделювання з використанням BIM-технологій, INOVA-аналізу інноваційних рішень, методу зважених кое-
фіцієнтів та економічних методів ефективності інвестицій. Матеріалами слугували технічна й проєктна до-
кументація будівель, статистика фактичного споживання енергії за кілька років.
Результати. Встановлено, що комплексне впровадження енергоощадних заходів дозволяє скоротити спо-
живання електроенергії до 30—35% та теплової енергії до 40—50%. INOVA-аналіз показав високий рівень
інноваційності.
Висновки. Застосування означених підходів дозволяє не лише зменшити енергоспоживання й експлуа-
таційні витрати, а й досягти високого рівня стійкості будівельних підприємств. Результати дослідження
можуть бути використані для формування нормативно-методичних підходів до енергомодернізації вироб-
ничих об’єктів.
Ключові слова: будівництво, організаційно-технологічні рішення, енергоощадність, BIM, INOVA-аналіз,
сталий розвиток, економічна доцільність, екологічна ефективність.
|
| id | oai:ojs2.scinn-eng.org.ua:article-1158 |
| institution | Science and Innovation |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-18T01:01:09Z |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | PH “Akademperiodyka” |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | scinn-engorgua/4e/f31d6cc102a360c84878878af3b8084e.pdf |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.scinn-eng.org.ua:article-11582026-06-17T11:30:40Z IMPROVEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES GIVEN ENERGY-SAVING REQUIREMENTS УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ PIDODNIA, O. DVORNICHENKO, A. DANYLOVA, T. NECHEPURENKO, D. KRAVCHUNOVSKA, T. будівництво організаційно-технологічні рішення енергоощадність BIM INOVA-аналіз сталий розвиток економічна доцільність екологічна ефективність construction organizational and technological solutions energy saving BIM INOVA analysis sustainable development , economic feasibility environmental efficiency Introduction. One of the determining factors in shaping the directions for the development of construction infrastructure is the increase in the level of energy efficiency of enterprises. This factor is considered a necessary condition for sustainable development, for ensuring environmental and economic security, for facilitating integration into the European energy space, and for supporting the formation of an energy-independent national economy.Problem Statement. The improvement of organizational and technological solutions for the reconstruction of construction enterprises is becoming increasingly relevant in the context of rising requirements for energy efficiency and environmental security. These conditions necessitate the search for scientifically substantiated approaches to the modernization of production facilities and technological processes.Purpose. The purpose of this study is the development and scientific substantiation of effective organizational and technological solutions for the reconstruction of construction enterprises, taking into account contemporary requirements for energy efficiency, environmental safety, and economic feasibility, with the aim of increasing their competitiveness and ensuring sustainable development.Materials and Methods. The research methodology includes a systematic and comparative analysis of scholarly research publications of 2020—2025. In addition, the study has applied BIM-based modeling, INOVA analysis of innovative solutions, the weighted coefficient method, and economic methods for eva luating investment efficiency. The empirical base of the study consists of technical and design documentation of buildings, as well as statistical data on actual energy consumption collected over several years.Results. The study has demonstrated that the comprehensive implementation of energy-saving measures significantly improves the energy performance of construction enterprises. In particular, the obtained results have shown that electricity consumption may decrease by 30—35%, while thermal energy consumption may be reduced by 40—50%. Furthermore, the conducted INOVA analysis has revealed a high level of innovation potential in the proposed technological and organizational solutions.Conclusions. The application of the proposed approaches makes it possible not only to reduce energy consumptionand operational costs, but also to increase the overall sustainability of construction enterprises. The results of the study can serve as a basis for the development of regulatory and methodological frameworks aimed at the energy modernization of industrial and construction facilities. Вступ. Одним із визначальних чинників формування напрямів розвитку будівельної інфраструктури єзростання рівня енергоефективності підприємств, що розглядається як необхідна умова сталого розвитку,забезпечення екологічної та економічної безпеки, інтеграції до європейського енергетичного простору істановлення енергонезалежної національної економіки.Проблематика. Актуальним є удосконалення організаційно-технологічних рішень реконструкції будівельних підприємств в умовах зростання вимог до енергоефективності, екологічної безпеки, що зумовлюєпотребу пошуку науково обґрунтованих підходів до їх модернізації.Мета. Розроблення та наукове обґрунтування ефективних організаційно-технологічних рішень реконструкції будівельних підприємств з урахуванням сучасних вимог до енергоефективності, екологічної безпеки й економічної доцільності, спрямованих на підвищення їхньої конкурентоспроможності та забезпечення сталого розвитку.Матеріали й методи. Застосовано системний та порівняльний аналіз наукових джерел за 2020—2025 рр.,моделювання з використанням BIM-технологій, INOVA-аналізу інноваційних рішень, методу зважених коефіцієнтів та економічних методів ефективності інвестицій. Матеріалами слугували технічна й проєктна документація будівель, статистика фактичного споживання енергії за кілька років.Результати. Встановлено, що комплексне впровадження енергоощадних заходів дозволяє скоротити споживання електроенергії до 30—35% та теплової енергії до 40—50%. INOVA-аналіз показав високий рівень інноваційності.Висновки. Застосування означених підходів дозволяє не лише зменшити енергоспоживання й експлуатаційні витрати, а й досягти високого рівня стійкості будівельних підприємств. Результати дослідженняможуть бути використані для формування нормативно-методичних підходів до енергомодернізації виробничих об’єктів. PH “Akademperiodyka” 2026-06-17 Article Article Рецензована стаття Peer-reviewed article application/pdf https://scinn-eng.org.ua/ojs/index.php/ni/article/view/1158 10.15407/scine22.03.095 Science and Innovation; Том 22 № 3 (2026): Science and Innovation; 95-116 Science and Innovation; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2026): Science and Innovation; 95-116 2413-4996 2409-9066 10.15407/scine22.03 en https://scinn-eng.org.ua/ojs/index.php/ni/article/view/1158/326 Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright Notice Authors published in the journal “Science and Innovation” agree to the following conditions: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of their work (article) published in the journal “Science and Innovation” (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish in their book), while confirming its initial publication in the journal “Science and innovation.” Authors are allowed to place their work on the Internet (for example, in institutional repositories or on their website). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| spellingShingle | будівництво організаційно-технологічні рішення енергоощадність BIM INOVA-аналіз сталий розвиток економічна доцільність екологічна ефективність PIDODNIA, O. DVORNICHENKO, A. DANYLOVA, T. NECHEPURENKO, D. KRAVCHUNOVSKA, T. УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ |
| title | УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ |
| title_alt | IMPROVEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES GIVEN ENERGY-SAVING REQUIREMENTS |
| title_full | УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ |
| title_fullStr | УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ |
| title_full_unstemmed | УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ |
| title_short | УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНИХ РІШЕНЬ РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЇ БУДІВЕЛЬНИХ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ІЗ УРАХУВАННЯМ ВИМОГ ЕНЕРГООЩАДНОСТІ |
| title_sort | удосконалення організаційно-технологічних рішень реконструкції будівельних підприємств із урахуванням вимог енергоощадності |
| topic | будівництво організаційно-технологічні рішення енергоощадність BIM INOVA-аналіз сталий розвиток економічна доцільність екологічна ефективність |
| topic_facet | будівництво організаційно-технологічні рішення енергоощадність BIM INOVA-аналіз сталий розвиток економічна доцільність екологічна ефективність construction organizational and technological solutions energy saving BIM INOVA analysis sustainable development economic feasibility environmental efficiency |
| url | https://scinn-eng.org.ua/ojs/index.php/ni/article/view/1158 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pidodniao improvementoforganizationalandtechnologicalsolutionsforthemodernizationofconstructionenterprisesgivenenergysavingrequirements AT dvornichenkoa improvementoforganizationalandtechnologicalsolutionsforthemodernizationofconstructionenterprisesgivenenergysavingrequirements AT danylovat improvementoforganizationalandtechnologicalsolutionsforthemodernizationofconstructionenterprisesgivenenergysavingrequirements AT nechepurenkod improvementoforganizationalandtechnologicalsolutionsforthemodernizationofconstructionenterprisesgivenenergysavingrequirements AT kravchunovskat improvementoforganizationalandtechnologicalsolutionsforthemodernizationofconstructionenterprisesgivenenergysavingrequirements AT pidodniao udoskonalennâorganízacíjnotehnologíčnihríšenʹrekonstrukcííbudívelʹnihpídpriêmstvízurahuvannâmvimogenergooŝadností AT dvornichenkoa udoskonalennâorganízacíjnotehnologíčnihríšenʹrekonstrukcííbudívelʹnihpídpriêmstvízurahuvannâmvimogenergooŝadností AT danylovat udoskonalennâorganízacíjnotehnologíčnihríšenʹrekonstrukcííbudívelʹnihpídpriêmstvízurahuvannâmvimogenergooŝadností AT nechepurenkod udoskonalennâorganízacíjnotehnologíčnihríšenʹrekonstrukcííbudívelʹnihpídpriêmstvízurahuvannâmvimogenergooŝadností AT kravchunovskat udoskonalennâorganízacíjnotehnologíčnihríšenʹrekonstrukcííbudívelʹnihpídpriêmstvízurahuvannâmvimogenergooŝadností |