ЯКІСТЬ УРОЖАЮ SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. ЗА ВПЛИВУ МІКРОБНИХ ПРЕПАРАТІВ І В ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ ВІД СТРОКІВ САДІННЯ В УМОВАХ ЗАХІДНОГО ПОЛІССЯ
Application of microbial preparation Planrhiz and fungicide Rydomil Gold MC 68 WG have improved yield, marketability of potatoes and have increased the standard part of tubers. Plants bakterization have promoted increase of potatoes marketability by reducing the number of small, mechanically damaged...
Gespeichert in:
| Datum: | 2013 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | Englisch Ukrainisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Institute of Agrocultural Microbiology and Agro-industrial Manufacture of NAAS of Ukraine
2013
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/208 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Назва журналу: | Agriciltural microbiology |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Institution
Agriciltural microbiology| _version_ | 1871465736215461888 |
|---|---|
| author | Бородай В.В., Бородай В.В. Данілкова , Т.В. Колтунов , В.А. |
| author_facet | Бородай В.В., Бородай В.В. Данілкова , Т.В. Колтунов , В.А. |
| author_institution_txt_mv | [
{
"author": "Бородай В.В. Бородай В.В.",
"institution": "Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України"
},
{
"author": "Т.В. Данілкова ",
"institution": "Державна фітосанітарна інспекція Львівської області"
},
{
"author": "В.А. Колтунов ",
"institution": "Київський національний торговельно-економічний університет"
}
] |
| author_sort | Бородай В.В., Бородай В.В. |
| baseUrl_str | https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2026-07-22T10:10:44Z |
| description | Application of microbial preparation Planrhiz and fungicide Rydomil Gold MC 68 WG have improved yield, marketability of potatoes and have increased the standard part of tubers. Plants bakterization have promoted increase of potatoes marketability by reducing the number of small, mechanically damaged and sick tubers, with the crop yield higher than the control in 1,5–1,9 times while the number of sick tubers have decreased in 2,4–5,5 times. The combination of microbial agents (Planrhiz + Diazofit + Phosphoenteryn) compared to single application of Planrhiz have revealed no significant difference between the yield and product marketability. As for the planting terms – the 1st planting term in the third decade of April have showed to be the best in West Polissya due to the formation of bigger number of standard part of the tubers. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.35868/1997-3004.17.126-137 |
| first_indexed | 2025-07-17T12:24:29Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
YIELD QUALITY OF SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. UNDER THE
INFLUENCE OF MICROBIAL PREPARATIONS AND DEPENDING ON
PLANTING TERMS IN WESTERN POLISSYA REGION
Boroday V. V.1, Danilkova T. V.2, Koltunov V. A.3
1National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 13, Heroiv
Oborony Str., Kyiv, 03041, E-mail: veraboro@gmail.com
2State Phytosanitary Inspection of Lviv Region, 18, Vitovskogo Str., 79011, Lviv
3Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, 19 Kyoto Str., 02156, Kyiv
Application of microbial preparation Planrhiz and fungicide Rydomil Gold
MC 68 WG have improved yield, marketability of potatoes and have increased the
standard part of tubers. Plants bakterization have promoted increase of potatoes
marketability by reducing the number of small, mechanically damaged and sick
tubers, with the crop yield higher than the control in 1,5–1,9 times while the
number of sick tubers have decreased in 2,4–5,5 times. The combination of
microbial agents (Planrhiz + Diazofit + Phosphoenteryn) compared to single
application of Planrhiz have revealed no significant difference between the yield
and product marketability. As for the planting terms – the 1st planting term in the
third decade of April have showed to be the best in West Polissya due to the
formation of bigger number of standard part of the tubers.
Keywords: Solanum tuberosum L., microbial preparations, marketability,
grade – out crop, quality, planting terms.
Commercial quality of the products, designed for long – term storage, sale
and processing, is largely determined by crop cultivation and harvesting conditions
[3, 6, 10]. Potatoes are very sensitive biological object actively responding to the
external influences that directly affect its consumer characteristics. Stability during
storage of vegetables and potatoes, their nutritional value, marketability and value
are specified by a set of interrelated factors throughout their way to the consumer.
However, in Ukraine, this integrated technological circuit is divided into the three
weakly interconnected stages: production, storage and sales. So, quality
preservation and loss reduction of fresh vegetables and potatoes during growing,
harvesting, transportation, storage and sales is a complex problem that is of great
importance. Unfavorable abiotic factors affect the quality of crop production,
causing decrease in resistance of vegetables and potatoes to fungal, bacterial and
viral diseases. Epiphytotic nature of their spread and products damage during
growing, storage and sales requires improvement of cultivation and storage
technologies of potatoes.
With the constant rise of costs, a radical change in the technologies of potato
growing is possible only through the development of adaptive farming systems,
based on the use of energy – saving, environmentally friendly, biological
technologies. Moreover, the most effective element in the structure of the
processing methods aimed at improving the productivity of potato is the use of
high – yielding varieties, which biological features meet the specific growing
conditions [3, 9, 10]. In this regard, it should be noted that current assortment of
potatoes varieties do not fully satisfy the requirements and needs of producers.
Besides, the agroecological assessment of varieties is absent or is not performed at
all [3, 11]. Therefore, along with the need to create new high – yielding varieties, it
is expedient to develop complex farming practices that would promote
implementation of potential characteristics of varieties in different agro – climatic
conditions.
The objective of given study was to identify the cultivation conditions and
processing methods under which the minimum number of grade – out and
marketable potato tubers will be produced.
Materials and methods. Methods of field experiments and research in
storing potatoes in given studies are commonly used [2, 8, 10]. Biological
preparations Planrhiz (based on bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens AR – 33),
Diazofit (biological agent – Agrobacterium radiobacter), Phosphoenteryn (PMB)
(based on phosphorous mobilizing bacteria Enterobacter nimipressuralis 32–3),
produced in the biological laboratory of State Inspection for Plant Protection in
Lviv region were used. Potatoes (early varieties Skarbnitsya and middle – ripening
Lileya), due to the unfavorable rainy conditions in Lviv area, were planted in
spring in the third week of April, and in the second and third weeks of May. Crop
harvesting was performed during third week of August and second week of
September.
Results and discussion. Application of biological and chemical preparations
compared with control variants have increased productivity, improving
marketability of potatoes and reducing the number of grade – out tubers.
The highest yield was formed by Skarbnitsya variety at complex application
of Planrhiz + Diazofit + FMB (2.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l/ha) – 36,2 – 48,3 t/ha. For Lileya
varieties – at use of Rydomil Gold (27,36 – 47,48 t/ha) (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4).
However, the highest marketability of Lileya variety was in variants with Planrhiz
application (2.5 l/ha) – 83,8 – 90% (variant without treatment – 57,5 – 71,3 %, at
application of Rydomil Gold – 73.9–86.9 %). Potatoes yield at use of Planrhiz in
different doses in Lileya variety – was 24,64–41,78 t/ha for joint inoculation with
Planrhiz + Diazofit + FMB – 24,08 – 43,68 t/ha; in Skarbnitsya variety – 30, 24 –
28,2 – 48,30 and 40.7 t/ha, respectively.
The use of microbial preparations have contributed to an output of more
marketable tubers. Grade-out crop was smaller comparing to the control due to the
formation of a small number of tubers damaged by disease, mechanically damage
and small tubers. Among all grade-out harvest components the part of small tubers
was 45.1 %, affected by diseases – 30.6 % and mechanically damaged – 16.0 %.
Thus, for Lileya variety of first planting term the percentage of grade-out crops
was 10 % at application of Planrhiz (2.5 l/ha) (control without treatment – 28.7 %),
at this the lowest yield of sick and affected by diseases tubers (3 9 and 2.5 % vs.
8.9 and 11.7 % in control) was observed (Table 1). A similar dependences were
observed for the combined application of Planrhiz + Diazofit + FMB (2.5 +0.2
+0.2 l/ha) – 8.5 and 3.3 % of small and affected by diseases tubers vs. 16.5 and
14.7 % in control, respectively. As for Skarbnitsya variety of first planting term the
marketable tuber yield was 25.3 % in the control, 10.8 % – at Planrhiz application
(2.5 l/ha) and 10.1 % – at combined use of Planrhiz + Diazofitom + FMB (1.5 +
0.2 + 0.2 l/ha) (Table 3).
During three years of investigation in all four soil–climatic zones of Lviv
region – the highest total and marketable tuber yield was obtained from the first
planting period, i.e. in the third decade of April [1, 5, 7]. The third term – the third
decade of May – was hardly applicable. Shifting the planting terms into the period
with intense intake of PAR and heat improves some conditions of photosynthetic
activity of potato crops, but leads to the diseases development, reduction of leaf
surface, chlorophyll formation, as well as accumulation of yield and starch in
tubers. Thus, the yield obtained in variants with Lileya varieties of first planting
term have exceeded the yield of the second planting term in average on 18,3–42,4
%; for Skarbnitsya varieties – on 11,2–36,7 %; yield of marketable products was
higher in Lileya varieties on 27.7–50.9 % and Skarbnitsya varieties – on 15,2–
41,9 %. The duration of the growing season was determined by the biological
characteristics of the potato varieties. By the changes in the studied parameters the
early variety Skarbnitsya was relatively stable as compared to the middle –
ripening Lileya variety. In the first planting term the quality grades evaluation for
Lileya and Skarbnitsya varieties have not revealed any significant differences,
while at the second –Skarbnitsya variety plants had yield higher on 4.57 t/ha,
structure almost no differences at grade-out products structure.
Biopreparations have contributed in a certain extent to the ecological
plasticity and adaptation of Lileya variety. In control variant (without treatment) of
first planting terms the marketable yield was 17.14 t/ha, and 8.65 t/ha – in the
second (less than 2 times), while application of microbial preparations have leveled
that difference – on average the output marketability have decreased on 27,7–
39,5%.
At combined use of Planrhiz and Gold Rydomil at first planting terms, no
difference between the output quality was observed. However, the second planting
term if compared to only single fungicide treatment in a Lileya variety the yield
was higher on 5.22 t/ha, with 7.7 % increase of marketability, and 4.8 % decrease
of small tubers yield and 3.3 % – of tubers affected by diseases (Table 2). For
Skarbnitsya variety, these values had no significant differences (Table 4).
Among the studied concentrations of Planrhiz, application of 2.0 – 2.5 l / ha
as comparing to 1.0 – 1.5 l / ha have showed the best results, while at combined
use of Planrhiz with Diazofit and FMB – 2.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha, respectively.
Some researchers state that combination of preparations subject to the
environmental and physiological compatibility of bacteria may differ in stability
and efficiency in different agro–climatic conditions [4, 9]. However, in Western
Polissya, the combination of microbial preparations as compared to single
application of Planrhiz have revealed no significant difference between the yield
and marketability indices, as wells as between the number of small tubers and
tubers affected by diseases.
TABLE 1. Structure of potato crop yield, depending on planting terms and application of biological and chemical preparations
(2009–2011, Lileya variety, West Polissya, first planting term)
Variants
Yield Grade-out yield part
Total,
t/ha
Commer-
cial, t/ha
Marke-
tability,
%
Total including, %
t/ha % small
with
emergences,
greenish
mecha-
nically
damaged
affected
by pests
affected
by
diseases
W/o treatment (control) 24.04 17.14 71.3 6.90 28.7 8.9 0.5 4.0 3.1 11.7
Phytocide. 1 l / ha 37.00 32.04 86.6 4.96 13.4 4.6 0.0 1.8 0.0 6.4
Rydomil Gold MC 68 WG
c.g 47.48 41.25 86.9 6.23 13.1 5.6 0.0 2.1 2.3 4.7
Planrhiz (1.0 l / ha) 37.48 31.04 82.8 6.44 17.2 9.6 1.0 1.9 0.8 4.0
Planrhiz (1.5 l / ha) 36.70 31.74 86.5 4.96 13.5 4.4 0.0 2.4 1.5 4.5
Planrhiz (2.0 l / ha) 38.26 32.86 85.9 5.40 14.1 7.7 0.5 0.9 0.6 4.1
Planrhiz (2.5 l / ha) 41.78 37.60 90.0 4.18 10.0 3.9 0.5 2.5 1.0 2.5
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(1.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 32.76 28.96 88.4 3.81 11.6 5.4 0.5 2.6 1.7 1.7
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(1.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 36.32 31.14 85.7 5.18 14.3 10.7 0.0 2.9 0.3 2.3
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(2.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 41.53 36.97 89.0 4.57 11.0 5.5 0.0 2.7 0.2 2.7
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(2.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 43.68 39.12 89.6 4.56 10.4 5.7 0.4 1.7 0.0 2.1
Planrhiz+ Rydomil Gold
MC 68WG, c. g(2.0 +2.5 l /
ha)
43.86 37.32 85.1 6.54 14.9 5.9 0.0 2.7 0.7 5.5
LSD05
1.2–
1.4
Mean 38.41 33.10 85.6 5.31 14.4 6.5 0.3 2.3 1.0 4.4
Note: no faded, frostbitten or stewed tubers, as well as soil were present.
TABLE 2. Structure of potato crop yield, depending on planting terms and application of biological and chemical preparations
(2009–2011 biennium, Lileya variety, West Polissya, second planting term)
Variants
Yield Grade-out yield part
Total,
t/ha
Commer-
cial, t/ha
Marke-
tability,
%
Total including, %
t/ha % small
with
emergences,
greenish
mecha-
nically
damaged
affected
by pests
affected
by
diseases
W/o treatment (control) 15,06 8,65 57,5 6,41 42,5 16,5 0,0 6,5 4,4 14,7
Phytocide. 1 l / ha 25,94 19,69 75,9 6,25 24,1 9,0 0,5 5,0 2,3 8,3
Rydomil Gold MC 68 WG
c.g 27,36 20,22 73,9 7,14 26,1 15,3 0,3 2,4 1,5 8,4
Planrhiz (1.0 l / ha) 24,64 19,53 79,3 5,11 20,7 10,3 0,0 2,8 1,3 7,8
Planrhiz (1.5 l / ha) 30,00 22,93 76,4 7,07 23,6 14,7 0,5 2,6 2,2 5,3
Planrhiz (2.0 l / ha) 26,06 20,56 78,9 5,50 21,1 14,2 0,7 2,8 1,7 4,1
Planrhiz (2.5 l / ha) 30,00 25,13 83,8 4,87 16,2 8,4 0,6 2,4 0,2 4,8
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(1.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 25,96 20,93 80,6 5,03 19,4 14,2 0,0 2,5 0,3 5,9
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(1.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 24,08 18,85 78,3 5,23 21,7 24,7 0,0 0,6 0,0 4,5
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(2.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 30,16 25,33 84,0 4,83 16,0 7,9 0,0 3,1 1,7 4,4
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(2.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 31,14 27,03 86,8 4,11 13,2 8,5 0,0 1,4 0,3 3,3
Planrhiz+ Rydomil Gold
MC 68WG, c. g(2.0 +2.5 l /
ha)
32,58 26,53 81,6 6,00 18,4 10,5 0,0 3,6 1,6 5,1
LSD05
1,3–
1,5
Mean 26,92 21,20 78,1 5,63 21,9 12,8 0,2 3,0 1,5 6,4
TABLE 3. Structure of potato crop yield, depending on planting terms and application of biological and chemical preparations
(2009–2011 biennium, Skarbnitsya variety, West Polissya, first planting term)
Variants
Yield Grade-out yield part
Total,
t/ha
Commer-
cial, t/ha
Marke-
tability,
%
Total including, %
t/ha % small
with
emergences,
greenish
mecha-
nically
damaged
affected
by pests
affected
by
diseases
W/o treatment (control) 25,72 19,20 74,7 6,52 25,3 8,3 0,3 4,3 1,9 10,4
Phytocide. 1 l / ha 42,30 36,29 85,8 6,01 14,2 5,1 0,7 1,5 2,2 4,6
Rydomil Gold MC 68 WG
c.g 41,14 36,15 87,9 4,99 12,1 5,5 0,0 3,2 1,1 2,3
Planrhiz (1.0 l / ha) 35,82 30,39 84,8 5,43 15,2 6,6 0,3 2,6 1,9 3,8
Planrhiz (1.5 l / ha) 40,70 34,86 85,7 5,84 14,3 5,3 0,0 3,6 1,9 3,4
Planrhiz (2.0 l / ha) 37,50 32,20 85,9 5,30 14,1 7,3 0,0 1,5 2,5 2,9
Planrhiz (2.5 l / ha) 39,28 35,05 89,2 4,23 10,8 4,0 0,0 1,3 2,7 2,8
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(1.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 44,52 38,94 87,5 5,58 12,5 4,3 0,0 2,9 2,6 2,3
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(1.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 43,08 38,72 89,9 4,36 10,1 4,4 0,3 2,0 0,7 2,5
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(2.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 48,30 41,48 85,9 6,82 14,1 7,4 0,0 1,6 0,5 4,4
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(2.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 46,14 40,07 86,8 6,07 13,2 9,1 0,0 1,8 0,9 1,9
Planrhiz+ Rydomil Gold
MC 68WG, c. g(2.0 +2.5 l /
ha)
40,14 35,40 88,2 4,74 11,8 4,7 0,0 2,7 1,2 3,5
LSD05
1,1–
1,4
Mean 40,39 34,90 86,0 5,49 14,0 6,0 0,1 2,4 1,7 3,7
TABLE 4. Structure of potato crop yield, depending on planting terms and application of biological and chemical preparations
(2009–2011 biennium, Skarbnitsya variety, West Polissya, second planting term)
Variants
Yield Grade-out yield part
Total,
t/ha
Commer-
cial, t/ha
Marke-
tability,
%
Total including, %
t/ha % small
with
emergences,
greenish
mecha-
nically
damaged
affected
by pests
affected
by
diseases
W/o treatment (control) 22,84 16,29 71,3 6,55 28,7 12,2 0,3 2,9 2,0 10,9
Phytocide. 1 l / ha 27,44 21,07 76,8 6,37 23,2 18,0 0,0 1,7 0,7 7,8
Rydomil Gold MC 68 WG
c.g 28,34 23,31 82,2 5,04 17,8 10,0 0,0 2,6 1,2 4,3
Planrhiz (1.0 l / ha) 30,24 23,55 77,9 6,69 22,1 12,3 0,0 1,9 2,1 6,5
Planrhiz (1.5 l / ha) 34,54 27,94 80,9 6,60 19,1 8,2 0,3 4,2 1,7 5,3
Planrhiz (2.0 l / ha) 36,64 28,67 78,3 7,97 21,7 11,1 0,7 2,5 0,9 7,1
Planrhiz (2.5 l / ha) 31,74 24,96 78,6 6,78 21,4 11,0 0,0 4,1 2,3 5,1
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(1.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 28,20 22,84 81,0 5,36 19,0 9,4 0,5 1,7 1,4 7,1
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(1.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 32,14 25,95 80,7 6,19 19,3 7,5 0,3 4,6 2,2 5,5
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(2.0 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 36,20 29,24 80,8 6,96 19,2 9,1 0,0 2,0 2,5 6,3
Planrhiz + Diazofit + PMB
(2.5 + 0.2 + 0.2 l / ha) 34,04 27,12 79,7 6,92 20,3 10,3 0,0 3,0 3,0 5,2
Planrhiz+ Rydomil Gold
MC 68WG, c. g(2.0 +2.5 l /
ha)
34,59 27,51 79,5 7,08 20,5 10,5 0,5 5,0 1,3 4,2
LSD05
1,2–
1,5
Mean 31,49 24,87 79,0 6,54 21,0 10,8 0,2 3,0 1,8 6,3
Thus, in Western Polessye, as compared to the control variants (water
treatment) and biological control (Fitocide), the biological preparation Planrhiz and
its combined use with Diazofit and FMB in different concentrations had influenced
on many factors, including yield increase in 1,5–1 9 times, output of standard
tubers parts in 1.2–1.4 times and reduction of small, mechanically damaged and
sick tubers in 2,4–5,5 times. When storing it is important to determine not only the
number of grade-out tubers, but also its structure. Treatment of potatoes with
Planrhiz has resulted in the highest output of standard products due to reduction of
small, mechanically damaged and sick tubers. The combined use of biological
preparations Planrhiz + Diazofit + FMB had the same effect. Potato treatment with
the mixture of Planrhiz and Rydomilom Gold MC 68 WG was proved to be more
effective than the single fungicide use during the second planting term. In terms of
planting in Western Polissya area the best results were obtained in variants with
the first planting term.
|
| id | oai:ojs2.smic.in.ua:article-208 |
| institution | Agriciltural microbiology |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English Ukrainian |
| last_indexed | 2026-07-23T01:06:46Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | Institute of Agrocultural Microbiology and Agro-industrial Manufacture of NAAS of Ukraine |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | smicinua/b5/6148b23716702d3bb91ccd66054c3db5.pdf |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.smic.in.ua:article-2082026-07-22T10:10:44Z YIELD QUALITY OF SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF MICROBIAL PREPARATIONS AND DEPENDING ON PLANTING TERMS IN WESTERN POLISSYA REGION ЯКІСТЬ УРОЖАЮ SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. ЗА ВПЛИВУ МІКРОБНИХ ПРЕПАРАТІВ І В ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ ВІД СТРОКІВ САДІННЯ В УМОВАХ ЗАХІДНОГО ПОЛІССЯ Бородай В.В., Бородай В.В. Данілкова , Т.В. Колтунов , В.А. Solanum tuberosum L., microbial preparations, marketability, grade – out crop, quality, planting terms Solanum tuberosum L., мікробні препарати, товарність, нестандартна частина врожаю, якість, строки садіння Application of microbial preparation Planrhiz and fungicide Rydomil Gold MC 68 WG have improved yield, marketability of potatoes and have increased the standard part of tubers. Plants bakterization have promoted increase of potatoes marketability by reducing the number of small, mechanically damaged and sick tubers, with the crop yield higher than the control in 1,5–1,9 times while the number of sick tubers have decreased in 2,4–5,5 times. The combination of microbial agents (Planrhiz + Diazofit + Phosphoenteryn) compared to single application of Planrhiz have revealed no significant difference between the yield and product marketability. As for the planting terms – the 1st planting term in the third decade of April have showed to be the best in West Polissya due to the formation of bigger number of standard part of the tubers. Застосування мікробного препарату Планризу та фунгіцидуРидоміл Голд МЦ 68 WG сприяло підвищенню врожайності татоварності картоплі, збільшенню частини стандартних бульб.Бактеризація забезпечувала підвищення товарності картоплівнаслідок зменшення кількості дрібних, механічно пошкодженихта хворих бульб, урожайність культури перевищувала контроль у1,5–1,9 раза, а кількість хворих бульб зменшилась у 2,4–5,5 раза.Поєднання мікробних препаратів (Планриз+Діазофіт+Фосфоентерин) порівняно з використанням лише Планризу не виявилозначної різниці між показниками урожайності та товарності.За строками садіння у зоні західного Полісся кращим виявився 1-йстрок садіння у третій декаді квітня за рахунок утворення більшоїкількості стандартних бульб. Institute of Agrocultural Microbiology and Agro-industrial Manufacture of NAAS of Ukraine 2013-10-01 Article Article Рецензована Стаття application/pdf application/pdf https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/208 10.35868/1997-3004.17.126-137 Agricultural microbiology; Vol. 17 (2013): Agriciltural microbiology; 126-137 Сільськогосподарська мікробіологія; Том 17 (2013): Сільськогосподарська мікробіологія; 126-137 1997-3004 10.35868/1997-3004.17 en uk https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/208/295 https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/208/296 Авторське право (c) 2013 V. V. Boroday , T. V. Danilkova , V. A. Koltunov https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Solanum tuberosum L. мікробні препарати товарність нестандартна частина врожаю якість строки садіння Бородай В.В., Бородай В.В. Данілкова , Т.В. Колтунов , В.А. ЯКІСТЬ УРОЖАЮ SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. ЗА ВПЛИВУ МІКРОБНИХ ПРЕПАРАТІВ І В ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ ВІД СТРОКІВ САДІННЯ В УМОВАХ ЗАХІДНОГО ПОЛІССЯ |
| title | ЯКІСТЬ УРОЖАЮ SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. ЗА ВПЛИВУ МІКРОБНИХ ПРЕПАРАТІВ І В ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ ВІД СТРОКІВ САДІННЯ В УМОВАХ ЗАХІДНОГО ПОЛІССЯ |
| title_alt | YIELD QUALITY OF SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF MICROBIAL PREPARATIONS AND DEPENDING ON PLANTING TERMS IN WESTERN POLISSYA REGION |
| title_full | ЯКІСТЬ УРОЖАЮ SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. ЗА ВПЛИВУ МІКРОБНИХ ПРЕПАРАТІВ І В ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ ВІД СТРОКІВ САДІННЯ В УМОВАХ ЗАХІДНОГО ПОЛІССЯ |
| title_fullStr | ЯКІСТЬ УРОЖАЮ SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. ЗА ВПЛИВУ МІКРОБНИХ ПРЕПАРАТІВ І В ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ ВІД СТРОКІВ САДІННЯ В УМОВАХ ЗАХІДНОГО ПОЛІССЯ |
| title_full_unstemmed | ЯКІСТЬ УРОЖАЮ SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. ЗА ВПЛИВУ МІКРОБНИХ ПРЕПАРАТІВ І В ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ ВІД СТРОКІВ САДІННЯ В УМОВАХ ЗАХІДНОГО ПОЛІССЯ |
| title_short | ЯКІСТЬ УРОЖАЮ SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L. ЗА ВПЛИВУ МІКРОБНИХ ПРЕПАРАТІВ І В ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ ВІД СТРОКІВ САДІННЯ В УМОВАХ ЗАХІДНОГО ПОЛІССЯ |
| title_sort | якість урожаю solanum tuberosum l. за впливу мікробних препаратів і в залежності від строків садіння в умовах західного полісся |
| topic | Solanum tuberosum L. мікробні препарати товарність нестандартна частина врожаю якість строки садіння |
| topic_facet | Solanum tuberosum L. microbial preparations marketability grade – out crop quality planting terms Solanum tuberosum L. мікробні препарати товарність нестандартна частина врожаю якість строки садіння |
| url | https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/208 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT borodajvvborodajvv yieldqualityofsolanumtuberosumlundertheinfluenceofmicrobialpreparationsanddependingonplantingtermsinwesternpolissyaregion AT danílkovatv yieldqualityofsolanumtuberosumlundertheinfluenceofmicrobialpreparationsanddependingonplantingtermsinwesternpolissyaregion AT koltunovva yieldqualityofsolanumtuberosumlundertheinfluenceofmicrobialpreparationsanddependingonplantingtermsinwesternpolissyaregion AT borodajvvborodajvv âkístʹurožaûsolanumtuberosumlzavplivumíkrobnihpreparatívívzaležnostívídstrokívsadínnâvumovahzahídnogopolíssâ AT danílkovatv âkístʹurožaûsolanumtuberosumlzavplivumíkrobnihpreparatívívzaležnostívídstrokívsadínnâvumovahzahídnogopolíssâ AT koltunovva âkístʹurožaûsolanumtuberosumlzavplivumíkrobnihpreparatívívzaležnostívídstrokívsadínnâvumovahzahídnogopolíssâ |