Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems

Background. Logistical gaps and territorial deformations of production capacities create unprecedented challenges for the dairy industry. This requires modernising capital investment management by transitioning to strategic investment in intelligent control systems, revising financial mechanisms, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2026
Hauptverfasser: Furman, Irina, Revkova, Anna, Biletska, Nataliia, Svynous, Nadiia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Dr. Viktor Koval 2026
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://ees-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/342
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Economics Ecology Socium
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Institution

Economics Ecology Socium
_version_ 1869472213646704640
author Furman, Irina
Revkova, Anna
Biletska, Nataliia
Svynous, Nadiia
author_facet Furman, Irina
Revkova, Anna
Biletska, Nataliia
Svynous, Nadiia
author_institution_txt_mv [ { "author": "Irina Furman", "institution": "Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine" }, { "author": "Anna Revkova", "institution": "Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine" }, { "author": "Nataliia Biletska", "institution": "Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Kyiv, Ukraine " }, { "author": "Nadiia Svynous", "institution": "University of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine" } ]
author_sort Furman, Irina
baseUrl_str https://ees-journal.com/index.php/journal/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2026-06-30T15:36:44Z
description Background. Logistical gaps and territorial deformations of production capacities create unprecedented challenges for the dairy industry. This requires modernising capital investment management by transitioning to strategic investment in intelligent control systems, revising financial mechanisms, and integrating environmental sustainability into the “from farm to fork” concept to ensure enterprise viability. Purpose. The purpose is to substantiate the development of a model for capital investment management by integrating end-to-end digital technologies into the “farm-to-fork” value chain, combining physical asset management (CAPEX) with the implementation of biogas (Bio-CNG) infrastructure. Findings. Analysis of the dynamics of gross milk production and investment activity in Ukraine in 2020–2024 revealed a deep structural transformation of the dairy market, characterised by a transition to intensive business models and the redistribution of production capacities toward the western and central regions. The strategic architecture of investment support enabled the formation of a holistic system of digital control over capital investments, ensuring the transition from spontaneous capacity renewal to strategic management of financial resources and increased enterprise competitiveness in the global dairy market. The use of AI-based predictive maintenance and digital twins optimises CAPEX and reduces OPEX by integrating renewable energy (Bio-CNG) into the logistics chain. The proposed model demonstrates how digital transparency creates premium value for products through eco-labelling and blockchain verification. The implementation of the Value-Chain Digital Control Model ensured a 75% increase in net profit, an increase in return on investment from 20% to 35% (by 15 percentage points), and a 44% reduction in the payback period (from 5 to 2.8 years). Implication. The dairy sector demonstrates adaptive resilience, with a trend toward producing high-value-added products for export. The developed digital architecture “from farm to fork” (Blockchain and Internet of Things) provides end-to-end quality control and protection of intellectual capital. The integration of bio-CNG infrastructure is a critical driver of energy independence and reduced logistics costs. Digital modernisation, combined with social and environmental responsibility, is identified as a priority mechanism for ensuring the competitiveness of Ukrainian dairy enterprises in the EU markets.
doi_str_mv 10.61954/2616-7107/2026.10.2-3
first_indexed 2026-07-01T01:00:35Z
format Article
fulltext Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 39 Research Article UDC 662.756:620.92 JEL: Q16, Q18, Q42, O13, O44 VALUE-CHAIN DIGITAL CONTROL MODEL OF CAPITAL INVESTMENT OPTIMISATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN FARM-TO-FORK SYSTEMS Irina Furman * Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9923-555X Anna Revkova Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2622-5681 Nataliia Biletska Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Kyiv, Ukraine ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6922-3614 Nadiia Svynous University of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3640-0519 *Corresponding author: E-mail: irina_furman@ukr.net Background. Logistical gaps and territorial deformations of production capacities create unprecedented challenges for the dairy industry. This requires modernising capital investment management by transitioning to strategic investment in intelligent control systems, revising financial mechanisms, and integrating environmental sustainability into the “from farm to fork” concept to ensure enterprise viability. Purpose. The purpose is to substantiate the development of a model for capital investment management by integrating end-to-end digital technologies into the “farm-to-fork” value chain, combining physical asset management (CAPEX) with the implementation of biogas (Bio-CNG) infrastructure. Findings. Analysis of the dynamics of gross milk production and investment activity in Ukraine in 2020–2024 revealed a deep structural transformation of the dairy market, characterised by a transition to intensive business models and the redistribution of production capacities toward the western and central regions. The strategic architecture of investment support enabled the formation of a holistic system of digital control over capital investments, ensuring the transition from spontaneous capacity renewal to strategic management of financial resources and increased enterprise competitiveness in the global dairy market. The use of AI-based predictive maintenance and digital twins optimises CAPEX and reduces OPEX by integrating renewable energy (Bio-CNG) into the logistics chain. The proposed model demonstrates how digital transparency creates premium value for products through eco-labelling and blockchain verification. The implementation of the Value-Chain Digital Control Model ensured a 75% increase in net profit, an increase in return on investment from 20% to 35% (by 15 percentage points), and a 44% reduction in the payback period (from 5 to 2.8 years). Implication. The dairy sector demonstrates adaptive resilience, with a trend toward producing high-value-added products for export. The developed digital architecture “from farm to fork” (Blockchain and Internet of Things) provides end- to-end quality control and protection of intellectual capital. The integration of bio-CNG infrastructure is a critical driver of energy independence and reduced logistics costs. Digital modernisation, combined with social and environmental responsibility, is identified as a priority mechanism for ensuring the competitiveness of Ukrainian dairy enterprises in the EU markets. Keywords: Biogas, Blockchain, Dairy Industry, Investment Management, Supply Chain Management. Received: 27/02/2026 Revised: 31/05/2026 Accepted: 08/06/2026 Published: 30/06/2026 DOI: 10.61954/2616-7107/2026.10.2-3 © Economics Ecology Socium, 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 license Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 40 1. Introduction. Against the backdrop of wartime and post- war conditions in Ukraine, the dairy industry faces unprecedented challenges, including political turbulence, disruptions to logistics networks, and the fragmentation of production capacities across territories. Modernisation of the mechanism for managing capital investments at dairy processing enterprises is impossible without the widespread adoption of digitalisation tools that enable moving from spontaneous renewal of fixed assets to strategic investment in intelligent control systems. The organisational reform of agribusiness is an important basis for such transformations, as it lays the institutional foundation for adapting economic structures to changing market conditions. Soteriades et al. (2018) claim that implementing innovative methods for feed and manure management significantly reduces the ecological footprint of dairy farms without compromising economic efficiency. The effectiveness of investment processes in modern conditions directly depends on the transparency of the information environment; in particular, high-quality financial reporting is a critical factor for the objective assessment of enterprise performance and capital attraction (Pravdiuk et al., 2021). The industry’s digital transformation requires a reassessment of traditional mechanisms for resource and financial management. In particular, the use of supply chain financing tools and modern inventory management systems is critical for optimising capital investments, especially for products with a limited shelf life (Marchi et al., 2024). It is the synergy between environmental sustainability and digital financial technologies that underpins an effective architecture for managing capital investments in dairy processing enterprises within the Farm-to-Fork Strategy framework. At the same time, the industry’s strategic development should focus on sustainable marketing, enabling Ukrainian agricultural enterprises not only to adapt to internal challenges but also to compete successfully in global food markets (Belkin et al., 2025). Despite significant theoretical developments, the practical implementation of end-to-end digital control systems in Ukrainian realities remains insufficiently explored. The identified need to develop a comprehensive model of digital supply chain management shapes further research on the practical implementation of agri-food chains and addresses the lack of an applied model that simultaneously optimises capital investments (CAPEX) under limited resources and ensures end-to-end quality control of food products. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the theoretical and methodological principles and develop applied tools for forming a model of capital investment management of dairy processing enterprises, based on the integration of end-to-end digital technologies (blockchain, IoT, AI) into the farm-to-fork value chain to ensure investment sustainability, environmental safety, and energy independence of the industry under martial law. To achieve the research aim, the following research questions (RQs) were identified: RQ1. To assess the dynamics of gross milk production, investment activity, and foreign trade balance of Ukraine for 2020–2024, taking into account the impact of military operations. RQ2. To investigate the territorial configuration of the dairy industry and identify the main centres of added value formation and investment leadership. RQ3. To develop an author’s model of an end-to-end digital control system that integrates blockchain technologies, the industrial IoT, and artificial intelligence to ensure the quality and protection of capital investments. RQ4. To substantiate the mechanism of combining physical asset management (CAPEX) with the implementation of biogas infrastructure and adaptive management methods to increase the sustainability of enterprises. Therefore, the development and implementation of an end-to-end digital control system is a strategic tool for transforming Ukrainian dairy processing enterprises into modern and highly efficient agribusiness facilities. Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 41 2. Literature Review. 2.1. Farm-to-Fork Concept. The current state of the global and domestic food industry is characterised by deep transformation, driven by the need to balance economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, and consumer demands. The key concept uniting these aspects is the “farm-to- fork” model, which aims to optimise supply chains and increase the transparency of production processes. The genesis of the “farm-to-fork” concept is closely related to the transformation of consumer values and the search for alternatives to globalised food systems. A fundamental contribution to understanding the importance of local connections was made by Waters (2007) demonstrated the dependence of final product quality and agricultural sector sustainability on ethical attitudes towards the land and direct support for small producers. This approach transformed the gastronomic niche into a systemic movement for transparency in the origin of food products. This initiative has evolved into a global sustainability initiative. Pollan (2006) argues that the gap between the “farm and fork” in the modern industrial system has resulted in a loss of control over energy costs and nutritional quality. Reducing the supply chain is considered the only way to restore food sovereignty and minimise climate impacts. This concept has become an official strategy for developing agro- industrial complexes in developed countries. According to the European Commission (2020), the transition to a sustainable food system requires not only changes in consumption culture but also a digital transformation of production processes. This creates the prerequisites for a new architecture of capital investment management, where information about each stage of a product’s movement, from primary raw materials to final sale. Kelly et al. (2025) stated that understanding the aspects of milk transformation at each stage of the chain, from lactation biology to complex processing technologies, is critical to ensuring product integrity and compliance with modern quality standards. It should also be noted that food safety remains a global problem, as hazardous substances can occur throughout the food supply chain, from farm to fork (Tian et al., 2025). In contrast to the residual approach, Serpeninova et al. (2024) identified an approach that considers social responsibility as compensation after profit is made. An integrated approach involves incorporating economic, social, and environmental factors (particularly quality control along the “farm-to-fork” chain) directly into decision-making. This creates conditions for ensuring economic development by considering the environmental and social consequences of an enterprise’s activities. Furthermore, Koval et al. (2025) showed that dairy enterprises face a wide range of challenges, including political and economic turbulence, disruptions in logistics networks, and changes in consumer sentiment. The modern “farm-to-fork” paradigm requires a comprehensive quality assurance approach that begins at the genetic potential and feeding stages of the animals. Mukherjee et al. (2025) argue that the transition from conventional breeding systems to sustainable production in the genomic era is the foundation of global food security, as it enables the programming of product quality characteristics at the breeding level. Precision nutritional approaches accompany this process. In particular, Kazemi and Valizadeh (2025) as well as Mukherjee et al. (2025) emphasised that the implementation of innovative feeding strategies is a key lever for increasing the biological value and safety of animal-based food products that meet the growing consumer demand for functional foods. An important aspect of the dairy market evolution is the differentiation of products based on health benefits. Manuelian et al. (2025) found that consumer acceptance of innovative products, such as type A2 milk, creates new niches and potential markets, requiring producers to be transparent about the production and consumption practices. This confirms that modern quality is not only about meeting standards but also about the ability to meet specific consumer needs within the farm-to-fork chain. Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 42 Digitalisation unites these processes technologically. According to a systematic review (Serrano-Torres et al., 2025), transforming dairy supply chains through AI enables end-to-end real-time quality control. This creates a solid foundation for a capital investment management architecture that leverages AI to minimise risks, optimise logistics, and guarantee product authenticity, critical to ensuring the resilience of dairy processing enterprises in crisis conditions. The “farm-to-fork” concept and the corresponding investment architecture are particularly relevant to overcoming the destructive consequences of military operations on Ukraine’s agricultural sector. Nitsenko et al. (2025) argue that the current state of domestic agribusiness requires the immediate revitalisation of logistics and handling operations activities and the strategic relocation of logistics processes. In the context of territorial deformations and the blocking of traditional routes, effective risk management and flexible restructuring of logistics chains are critical for maintaining the viability of the industry’s export and domestic potential. This directly correlates with the need to develop digital models of capital investment management that enable dairy processing enterprises to quickly adapt their value chains to the changed conditions resulting from the dislocation of production facilities and new logistical challenges. The identified shortcomings of the developed sources indicate the fragmentation of investment models that do not offer clear capital management algorithms in conditions of limited resources and high risks of asset destruction. Thus, there is an objective need to develop an integrated investment management model that combines environmental “farm-to- fork” standards with flexible anti-crisis marketing methods and digital control. 2.2. Digital Management of Capital Investments. In the context of digitalisation, the technological architecture for managing dairy investments is shifting from equipment renewal to the creation of intelligent systems. The synergy of artificial intelligence, IoT, and Blockchain provides end-to-end quality control from “farm-to-fork”, optimising resources and strengthening the enterprise’s intellectual capital. Military challenges require implementing flexible Agile methods to rapidly relocate logistics and adapt investments to the risks of asset destruction. Thus, digital architecture becomes the foundation for energy independence and the industry’s survival in turbulent conditions. Czeglédi (2025) eliminated the gap between the cultivation and consumption of agricultural products. The corresponding model promotes a direct connection between producers and end consumers. Although a “farm-to-fork” model is the shortest, this streamlined approach minimises logistical and administrative complexities, reducing the distance and time between harvest and consumption to a minimum. Kelly et al. (2025) argue that, despite the very long history of dairy products and their high level of consumption in the world today, the future of the dairy industry is now perhaps under greater threat than at any time in history, with the emergence of concerns about the health, ethical and environmental impacts of dairy production, as well as the rise of veganism and the associated desire to find alternatives to dairy products. According to Subbotina-Dubinski and Carbon (2025), the main thematic clusters related to changes in the food industry in general (sustainable food practices) and dairy in particular (empirical dimensions of food). Yin (2025) and Mosiuk et al. (2025) argued that cognitive and emotional reactions of customers mediate the influence of restaurant incentives, especially environmental practices, on pro-environmental behaviour and behavioural intentions of consumers during dining, thereby influencing the effective development of responsible strategies in environmentally conscious food establishments. This shift towards responsible consumption and reputation-based value creation has a direct impact on capital investment management in the agri-food sector, particularly in dairy processing. Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 43 Lohosha et al. (2024) argue that efforts should be made in Ukraine to develop a separate, original regulatory concept based on a contractual approach (as an internal mechanism for coordinating the actions of economic agents in the market). State regulation (as an external instrument for shaping regulatory rules governing the behaviour of market participants/relationships) to achieve an acceptable market state. Chikov and Titov (2025) show that modernising the mechanism for capital investment management at dairy processing enterprises is impossible without widespread digitalisation. It allows moving from the spontaneous renewal of fixed assets to strategic investment in intelligent control systems, which becomes the foundation for increasing the industry’s competitiveness. It is worth noting that, according to Popovych et al. (2023), the economic efficiency of digitalisation in the dairy sector is manifested in increased labour productivity and reduced costs through resource optimisation. Stavska et al. (2022) indicated that agile development helps product groups deliver software that meets customers’ growing needs. Simultaneously, the successful implementation of an end-to-end digital control system in dairy processing enterprises depends not only on technical equipment but also on the intellectual basis of the organisation. Pidvalna et al. (2022) argue that developing an innovative strategy should be based on building intellectual capital, which is imperative for ensuring the sustainability of enterprises in the context of digitalisation. Ensuring the sustainable development of the agri-food sector, particularly the dairy industry, is only possible using an integrated approach. While Serpeninova et al. (2024) and Koval et al. (2025) emphasise the importance of corporate social responsibility and sustainable management, Chikov and Titov (2025), Popovych et al. (2023), and Stavska et al. (2022) indicate that the technical foundation of sustainability is digitalisation, the implementation of IoT tools, and agile management. However, despite significant research on the “farm-to-fork” concept and the importance of intellectual capital (Pidvalna et al., 2022), the issue of the practical implementation of end-to-end digital control systems in the context of the war- and post-war economy of Ukraine remains insufficiently covered. In particular, the mechanism of combining contractual market regulation (Lohosha et al., 2024) with technological innovations to address logistical gaps and personnel shortages (Mosiiuk, 2026) requires further study. Thus, the need to develop a comprehensive model of digital supply chain management that integrates intellectual property, social responsibility, and high food safety standards has been identified, which will determine the direction of this research. 3. Methodology. The research methodology is based on a complex combination of general scientific and specialised methods that enable a deep analysis of the investment architecture of the dairy industry under martial law and in the context of digital transformation. The research process begins with a retrospective analysis of the dynamics of milk production and the cow population for 2020– 2024, which enables identification of critical points of decline in raw material volumes and deformation of the industry's territorial structure. At the next stage, the method of statistical and economic screening was applied to assess capital investments and export-import operations, thereby enabling the determination of the level of financial stability of dairy processing enterprises. An important place in the work is occupied by the method of economic and mathematical modelling, which was used to design a digital control system for the "farm- to-fork" strategy, integrating blockchain, artificial intelligence, and IoT tools to minimise operating costs. In addition, the study substantiates the implementation of energy- efficient infrastructure based on Bio-CNG, as demonstrated by return on investment (ROI) and capital expenditure optimisation (CAPEX) indicators. Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 44 Verification of the results is carried out by comparing theoretical models with actual data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2025) and customs reporting, which confirms the practical value of the proposed solutions for increasing the investment attractiveness of the agricultural sector. The use of a systemic approach enables the development of a holistic vision of the dairy business as a vertically integrated structure capable of adapting to global challenges and meeting European quality standards. The model is based on the calculation of the effectiveness of cost optimisation: 𝑅𝑂𝐼 ∗ 100% (1) To assess the impact of digital control on operating expenditures (OPEX), the functional dependence is used: ∆𝑂𝑃𝐸𝑋 𝐶 𝐶 𝐸 𝐸 (2) where, Clog – costs on traditional logistics; Cmaint – costs on reactive equipment maintenance; Ebio – savings from the use of BioCNG; Eai – savings from the implementation of AI-predictive maintenance. The methodology for developing the model of an end-to-end digital control system involves integrating technological tools into a single architecture to optimise capital investments across the value chain. The methodology is based on an algorithm for identifying key “farm-to-fork” links and the selection of appropriate digital technologies, such as blockchain to ensure the safety of raw materials, industrial IoT for predictive maintenance of equipment, and artificial intelligence for modelling energy-efficient solutions. The model is developed by combining CAPEX with intellectual property protection and the implementation of adaptive management methods (Agile management). The final stage of building the model involves systematising economic components, where the use of digital twins and quality verification systems maximises net profit, ensures energy independence through Bio-CNG infrastructure, and creates premium product value in global markets. The proposed investment architecture for the dairy industry is based on the concepts of vertical integration and the digitalisation of the full value-creation cycle, in line with the “Farm- to-Fork” Strategy (Fig. 1). Fig. 1. Strategic Framework for Sustainable Dairy Investment under Green and Digital Transition. Level 1: Technological Foundation Level 2: Operating management Level 3: Information Transparency Level 4: Economic result Capital investments in the modernisation of investment farms and the construction of biogas plants Development of BioCNG, logistics, and implementation of AI models at dairy plants Blockchain verification (full traceability of products (“farm-to- fork”) and building digital trust ROI growth Waste processing in biogas plants, management modernisation Modernisation of production and logistics processes QR coding on the final product with the possibility of familiarising yourself with the full production cycle Eco-labelling Formation of premium value R einvestm ent based on the principles of circular econom y Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 45 The model is based on a systematic combination of a technological foundation, including investments in IIoT sensors and biogas infrastructure for the production of Bio- CNG fuel, with a digital level of operational management based on artificial intelligence. The industry transformation process is implemented through a blockchain-based verification mechanism at each stage of product movement, providing absolute transparency and traceability for the end consumer. Economic efficiency is achieved through radical optimisation of operating costs and the creation of premium value for environmentally labelled products, which directly correlates with the growth of investment profitability indicators and the enterprise’s overall investment sustainability in the face of global challenges. The model’s closed cycle involves the constant reinvestment of profits into the development of innovative infrastructure, creating a sustainable circular ecosystem for the dairy business. The analysis does not cover temporarily occupied territories or combat zones. The BioCNG infrastructure model is considered a tool for optimising logistics, specifically for large and medium-sized milk plants with an intensive business model. 4. Results. 4.1. Analysis of the State of the Dairy Processing Industry in Ukraine. The analysis of milk production volumes and industry activities indicates a deep structural transformation of Ukraine’s dairy market, characterised by a transition to intensive business models amid a gradual reduction in the total number of cows from 2.54 million in 2013 to a projected 1.15 million in 2025. Despite the overall decrease in the volume of milk supplied for processing, there is a qualitative increase in the role of the industrial sector, where the volume of raw material supplies from agricultural enterprises increased to 2.88 million tons in 2024, which confirms the dominance of professional farms in ensuring food stability (Fig. 2). Fig. 2. Dynamics of Cow Population and Milk Supply for Processing in Ukraine. * - data are updated without temporarily occupied territories. Source: based on data Association of Milk Producers (2025). Despite martial law and the loss of part of the production capacity, in 2024, the agricultural sector of Ukraine recorded a gross milk production volume of 7,246.4 thousand tons, which indicates a deep transformation of the industry and a change in its territorial configuration (Fig. 3). The current state of dairy cattle breeding is characterised by pronounced regional concentration, where the leading positions are occupied by Poltava, Vinnytsia, and Khmelnytsia regions, which together provide a significant share of national raw material production due to the preservation of livestock and high productivity of the industrial herd. 2.43 2.21 2.10 2.02 1.92 1.78 1.67 1.55 1.34 1.29 1.22 1.15 0.58 0.57 0.53 0.5 0.48 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.38 0.39 0.38 4.66 4.66 4.31 4.18 4.3 4.17 3.8 3.51 3.24 2.44 2.86 3.12 3.23 2.27 2.42 2.41 2.51 2.65 2.72 2.61 2.56 2.48 2.18 2.55 2.88 2.97 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 2013 2014 2015* 2016* 2017* 2018* 2019* 2020* 2021* 2022* 2023* 2024* 2025* Number of cows (total), million heads Number of cows at agricultural enterprises, million heads Milk supplied for processing (total), million tons Milk supplied by agricultural enterprises, million tons Economics E Volume 10 At th depressed particularly where ho infrastructu production general tr indicates t household Fig. 3. Sou (2025) usin At investment processing demonstrat to exogen technologi expenditur concentrate of industria This Vinnytsia, main cent structure o modernisin implement efficient s Ecology Soci Issue 2 (202 he same tim in the east y in Luhans ostilities a ure have le n capacity (N rend in the the gradual production Dairy Prod urce: based ng the Micro the same t activity g sector a tes the indu nous chall cal restruc res, totalling ed in region al livestock confirms t Kyiv, and tres of add of investme ng existing tation of solutions an ium 26) me, indicato tern and so sk, Donetsk and the d to a critic Nitsenko et e industry' replaceme by a more duction by on Associa osoft Bing Se time, the in Uk as of Jan ustry’s ada lenges and turing. The g USD 164 ns with high k farming (F the strategi d Poltava ded value. nts reflects g capacitie “farm-to- nd digital ors are seve outhern regi k, and Kher destruction cal reductio t al., 2025). 's developm nt of exten technologic Region, Ja T ation of Mil earch API p e analysis kraine’s d uary 1, 2 aptive resili d its gra e main ca 4.8 million, h concentrat Fig. 4). c leadershi regions as The territ s the priorit es through fork” ene quality con 46 erely ions, rson, of on in The ment nsive cally adva resil key milk of t with the indu anuary 1, 2 Territories) lk Producer latform. s of dairy 2025 ence adual apital , are tions ip of the orial ty of the ergy- ntrol tool incr Euro inve Khm proc capa con envi from rene Inve deve indu anced indu lience to ex guarantor o Thus, th k productio the agro-ind h the centra main sourc ustry. 2025 (Exclu ). rs (2025); S ls, which reasing exp opean integ At the estments in melnytskyi cesses o acities and sumer mark At the be ironment i m point rec ewal aimed estment) a elopment o ustrial comp strial sector xternal chal of the state's he geograp on in 2024 r dustrial com al and west ces of raw m uding Temp State Statist are criti port potenti gration. same tim n western and Lv f decent d their ap kets. eginning of s character covery to s d at maxim and ensur f the dairy s plex. e-ISSN ISSN-L r, which de llenges and s food secur phical distr reflects the mplex to ne ern regions materials fo porarily Oc tics Service ically imp ial in the e, the dy regions, p viv, indica tralising pproximatio f 2025, the rised by a systemic tec ising ROI ring the sub-sector o N 2786-8958 L 2616-7107 emonstrates becomes a rity. ribution of adaptation ew realities, s serving as or the dairy ccupied of Ukraine portant for context of ynamics of particularly ate active processing n to new investment a transition chnological (Return on sustainable of the agro- s a f n , s y e r f f y e g w t n l n e - Economics E Volume 10 Fig. 4. Vol Sou platform. An production 2020–2024 gross prod which is d and the l actions (F dairy prod 1,450.66 correlated due to mig trends, the for indust thousand F Note: Sevas well a Sourc 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Produ Consu Ecology Soci Issue 2 (202 lumes of In urce: based alysis of n and con 4 indicates duction by due to the loss of liv Fig. 5). Th ducts in th thousand with the d gration. De e volume o trial proces tons, Fig. 5. Balan Data exclud stopol, and pa as areas where ce: based on 92 25 20 83 2020 uction, thousan umption per c ium 26) nvestments (Exclud on Associa the bala nsumption a significa y 2,017.2 t destruction vestock du he total co he country tons, whic decrease in spite the ge of raw mat ssing incre indicating nce of Milk de the tempor arts of the Do e active hostil n Associatio 263.6 556 01.9 90.56 nd tons apita, kg per p in Dairy P ding Tempo tion of Milk ance of m in Ukraine ant reductio thousand t n of enterpr ue to mili onsumption y decreased ch is dire the popula eneral nega terials supp ased by 6 a gra k Productio rarily occupie onetsk and Lu lities have occ on of Milk Pr 8713.9 3197.8 201.5 8295.15 2021 person 47 Processing E orarily Occ k Producers milk e in on in tons, rises itary n of d by ectly ation ative plied 66.7 adual tech disp prod Sim con incr the sign nutr fore sign Ukr imp grea on and Con ed territories uhansk region curred or are o roducers (20 2 2 51 2022 Enterprise cupied Terr s (2025) usin hnological placement duction multaneously sumption reased by 8 actual fi nificantly b rition stand eign dairy tr nificant tran rainian mark port depend ater exp nsumption of the Auton ns. Data exclu ongoing. 025). 7767.7 2767.5 206 7210 Supplied for i Consumption s, January ritories). ng the Micr transfor of ex by the y, positive per capita 8.4 kg/perso igure of below the dards. Analy rade in 2020 nsformation ket, charact dence in ort pote in Ukraine omous Repub ude territories 7430. 2918. 202.4 6719. 2024 industrial proc n, thousand ton e-ISSN ISSN-L 1, 2025, m rosoft Bing rmation xtensive industria e dynamic a were re on, althoug 210.3 kg establishe ysis of the d 0–2024 dem in the struc terised by a certain cat ential (T e, 2020-202 blic of Crime s temporarily 4 4 68 cessing, thous ns N 2786-8958 L 2616-7107 million USD Search API and the household l sector. s of milk ecorded. It gh in 2024, remained ed rational dynamics of monstrates a cture of the a shift from tegories to able 2). 4. a, the city of occupied, as 7246.4 3222.7 210.3 6939.9 sands of tons I e d k t , d l f a e m o f s Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 48 Table 2. Volume of Imports and Exports of Dairy Products (thousands USD), 2020–2024. 2020 Product (UKTZED Code) Import Export Cost Share Net weight, t Cost Share Net weight, t Milk and cream, not condensed 11,624 0.02% 12,969 12,006 0.02% 18,642 Milk and cream, condensed 14,005 0.03% 6,144 55,529 0.11% 27,417 Buttermilk, fermented or soured milk, and cream 14,029 0.03% 9,921 8,974 0.02% 5,694 Whey 6,920 0.01% 5,062 22,304 0.05% 26,904 Butter 40,580 0.07% 10,012 48,733 0.10% 11,229 Cheese 210,487 0.39% 46,767 24,414 0.05% 6,358 2021 Product (UKTZED Code) Import Export Cost Share Net weight, t Cost Share Net weight, t Milk and cream, not condensed 13,377 0.02% 14,369 10,372 0.02% 14,922 Milk and cream, condensed 21,204 0.03% 7,799 57,366 0.08% 22,426 Buttermilk, fermented or soured milk, and cream 20,008 0.03% 14,005 8,649 0.01% 5,504 Whey 12,335 0.02% 9,628 22,821 0.03% 22,218 Butter 45,529 0.06% 9,148 52,308 0.08% 10,858 Cheese 260,329 0.36% 55,193 26,692 0.04% 6,924 2022 Product (UKTZED Code) Import Export Cost Share Net weight, t Cost Share Net weight, t Milk and cream, not condensed 8,594 0.01% 9,386 16,387 0.04% 29,350 Milk and cream, condensed 4,027 0.01% 1,214 89,983 0.20% 26,696 Buttermilk, fermented or soured milk, and cream 14,938 0.03% 9,456 4,668 0.01% 3,055 Whey 6,904 0.01% 4,917 15,765 0.04% 15,269 Butter 7,910 0.01% 1,128 81,742 0.19% 14,104 Cheese 182,159 0.31% 33,818 42,278 0.10% 8,989 2023 Product (UKTZED Code) Import Export Cost Share Net weight, t Cost Share Net weight, t Milk and cream, not condensed 6,069 0.01% 5,126 16,572 0.05% 28,315 Milk and cream, condensed 4,738 0.01% 1,263 68,670 0.19% 27,676 Buttermilk, fermented or soured milk, and cream 17,376 0.03% 8,670 4,172 0.01% 3,353 Whey 12,474 0.02% 6,887 10,854 0.03% 16,181 Butter 16,633 0.03% 2,657 41,770 0.12% 7,790 Cheese 200,774 0.32% 33,685 39,962 0.11% 8,879 2024 Product (UKTZED Code) Import Export Cost Share Net weight, t Cost Share Net weight, t Milk and cream, not condensed 4,048 0.01% 2,021 17,620 0.04% 26,601 Milk and cream, condensed 5,321 0.01% 1,520 74,284 0.18% 29,487 Buttermilk, fermented or soured milk, and cream 16,820 0.02% 8,189 5,917 0.01% 4,375 Whey 10,813 0.02% 6,088 13,377 0.03% 18,685 Butter 18,577 0.03% 2,576 48,897 0.12% 7,178 Cheese 227,088 0.32% 38,284 54,208 0.13% 12,428 Source: based on State Customs Service of Ukraine (2025). Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 49 Cheese remains the most significant import item throughout the entire period, and its value reaches USD 227.1 million in 2024, an increase of 8,483 tons from 2020. Simultaneously, the export sector experienced rapid growth in condensed milk and butter, with sales peaking in 2022, when butter exports almost doubled from the previous year to USD 81.74 million. Despite the general trend of increasing exports of whole milk and cream by 7,959 tons, deliveries of buttermilk and whey abroad showed a negative deviation, indicating a reorientation of domestic processing. As of 2024, domestic producers significantly strengthened their positions in foreign cheese markets, increasing exports by 6.1 thousand tons, compared to the base period. Together with the dominance of condensed milk in the export structure, this underscores the industry’s strategic development of high-value products. The reduction in the imports of butter and non-condensed dairy products in 2022– 2024, compared to 2021, indicates successful import substitution and the dairy sector’s adaptation to crisis operating conditions. The identified negative deviation in the export of certain categories, along with the preservation of a high share of cheese imports, underscores the need for new competitiveness tools that focus on the digital management of the value chain. The analysis of the foreign trade balance and regional investment structure indicates the presence of an institutional trap. Despite increased industrial sector efficiency, the industry remains vulnerable to fluctuations in energy carrier prices and the strict requirements of European safety standards. This determines the objective need to transition from fragmented automation to a comprehensive digital architecture that integrates physical asset management (CAPEX) with the protection of the enterprise’s intellectual capital. 4.2. Digital Transformation of the Farm-to-Fork Value Chain for European Market Integration. It is worth noting that the transformation of the Ukrainian dairy sector under war conditions involves not only relocating production facilities but also deep digital modernisation, which is key to preserving capital and entering premium European markets. Ensuring the above-mentioned sustainability of export potential and CAPEX efficiency requires a transition to fundamentally new technological foundations, which are systematised in Table 3. Table 3. Digital Transformation and Investments Optimisation in the Farm-to-Fork Value Chain. Strategic Task Supply Chain Stage Key Digital Technologies Impact on CAPEX, ROI, and Quality Assurance Blockchain-based traceability for digital raw material management, ensuring product origin, quality, and safety. Farm → Processing Blockchain, IoT Sensors Improved traceability, enhanced quality assurance, reduced food safety risks, and lower production losses. Predictive maintenance to safeguard investments in critical processing equipment. Processing IIoT, AI-based Predictive Maintenance Cost and downtime reduction, improved reliability, and CAPEX preservation. Strategic investment in biogas production and Bio-CNG infrastructure to reduce logistics- related operating costs and strengthen energy resilience. Recycling / Biogas Production Digital Twins, AI-Based Modelling Improved justification of CAPEX allocated to biogas facilities through long-term OPEX savings, waste valorisation, and enhanced energy independence. End-to-end monitoring of green logistics through cold-chain control and optimisation of Bio- CNG-powered transport routes. Logistics IoT Sensors, GPS/Telematics, AI Optimisation Improved product quality and safety during transportation. Efficient utilisation of logistics assets and reduced transportation costs. Maximising return on investment through digital transparency, sustainable logistics, and consumer-oriented value creation. Consumer / Market Blockchain, Digital Marketing Integration Faster ROI driven by consumer trust, brand loyalty, and willingness to pay a premium for certified quality and sustainability. Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 50 As a result of the research, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the implementation of innovative technologies at each stage of the agri-food cycle. It reveals the mechanisms for integrating blockchain, the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and artificial intelligence to ensure end- to-end transparency of raw material flows, predictive maintenance of expensive equipment, and justification of capital investments in renewable energy, in particular, Bio-CNG infrastructure. The production of biogas from dairy processing waste is particularly relevant given rising energy prices. In general, the application of this chain demonstrates the transition to a sustainable, high-tech agribusiness model, where environmental responsibility and digital verification become key drivers of higher margins and premium product value in the market. The comprehensive architecture of the digital management model for the farm-to-fork chain, presented in Table 4, reveals a multifaceted approach to transforming dairy processing enterprises through the synergy of technological transparency, capital management, and strengthening the organisation's intellectual base. This structure demonstrates how integrating blockchain, industrial IoT, and AI modelling tools not only enables end-to-end control from farm to consumer but also provides a reliable foundation for enterprise sustainability amid global digital transformations. Particular attention in the architectonics is paid to the combination of social and environmental responsibility with adaptive management methods, which, through the implementation of Agile management and "green" infrastructure, helps overcome logistical gaps and increase business margins by creating a premium value for the end consumer. Table 4. Digital Management Architecture for the Farm-to-Fork Value Chain in Dairy Processing Enterprises. Component of the Model Key Tools and Technologies Object of Integration and Influence Economic and Social Impact Technological Transparency and Security Blockchain, IoT sensors, AI modelling End-to-end control from farm to end consumer Minimising food safety risks and ensuring product quality Capital and Investment Management Predictive maintenance (IIoT), digital twins Protection of expensive equipment and assets (CAPEX) Reducing unforeseen costs, maximising ROI, and achieving energy independence Intellectual Capital Development Protection of intellectual property, development of intellectual capital Innovative development strategy and commercialisation of ideas Formation of economic sustainability of the enterprise in the context of digital transformations Socio- Environmental Responsibility Sustainable food practices, Bio-CNG infrastructure, ESG reporting Corporate social responsibility and environmental verification Increasing marginality through the formation of premium value for the conscious consumer Adaptive Management Agile management (Management 3.0), anti- crisis marketing Flexibility of production and logistics chains in wartime Overcoming logistical gaps and personnel shortages The systematisation of economic components of the model, presented in Table 5, reveals a specific mechanism for converting digital tools into effective financial indicators at each stage of the enterprise’s capital reproduction cycle. It displays the strategic relationship between the use of digital twins to justify investments (CAPEX) in modernisation and energy independence, and the final optimisation of the capital investment structure (Soteriades et al., 2018). Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 51 At the production and logistics stages, the use of intelligent monitoring systems and blockchain provides effective protection of fixed assets and a significant reduction in operating expenses (OPEX), which ultimately allows for maximising net profit and ROI through the use of digital quality verification as a key factor in the formation of a premium price in the market. Thus, the developed model confirms that implementing an end-to-end digital verification system and complying with social and environmental responsibility standards are key tools for ensuring the sustainability of the agri-food sector. This establishes the prerequisites for increasing the marginality of domestic products and their successful integration into the European economic space, based on transparency, quality, and high technological competitiveness. The justification of the proposed model is based on the integration of digital management systems with bioenergy infrastructure, which allows maximising the efficiency of capital investments, which in 2025 were recorded at the level of USD 164.8 million for the entire food industry and USD 24.1 million directly for the Vinnytsia region using the example of an advanced dairy processing enterprise, Lityn Dairy Plant LLC (Litynskyi Molochnyi Zavod LLC). The implementation of digital control using the Value-Chain Digital Control algorithm transforms the traditional approach to CAPEX management, reorienting resources toward the creation of intelligent monitoring systems and biomethane infrastructure, thereby increasing net profit from a conventional USD 400 to 700 thousand per year for an average facility in the industry. The main economic effect is achieved through a radical reduction in operating costs due to the complete replacement of fossil fuels with its own Bio-CNG, which frees up about USD150 thousand annually, as well as through the use of artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance of equipment, which saves additional USD 50 thousand per year on service costs. Table 5. Economic Components and Financial Effects of the Digital Farm-to-Fork Management Model Stage of the Capital Reproduction Cycle Economic Tools and Technologies Functional Role in the Model Expected Financial Outcome CAPEX Formation (Investment Stage) AI modelling, Digital twins Bio-CNG and modernisation cost justification Optimisation of the structure of CAPEX Production Stage (Operational Efficiency) IoT, Predictive maintenance Protection of fixed assets from premature wear and emergency shutdowns Minimisation of unpredictable CAPEX, productivity growth Logistics Stage (Distribution and Sales) IoT monitoring, Blockchain Ensuring the quality of raw materials and finished products in real time Reducing OPEX for fuel and losses from product defects Market Realisation (Value Creation) Digital Quality Verification, Blockchain- Based Traceability Certified quality and sustainability support premium positioning Increased ROI, higher profit margins, and growth in net profit The additional value in this model is generated through the blockchain quality verification mechanism, which enables capitalising on the trust of European consumers and receiving a premium of USD100 thousand per year, which is critically important within the framework of implementing the Farm-To-Fork Strategy. The application of the developed mathematical model for calculating ROI shows an increase in return on capital from 20% to 35%, which directly correlates with a reduction in the payback period of investment projects from 5 to 2.8 years (Table 6). Thus, the synergistic effect of digitalisation and bioenergy autonomy ensures not only the enterprise’s energy independence but also creates a sustainable mechanism for optimising OPEX, turning technological costs into a source of strategic competitive advantage in global markets. Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 52 Table 6. Economic Efficiency of Implementing the Value-Chain Digital Control Model at Lityn Dairy Plant LLC. Indicator Category Calculation Parameter Traditional Model (Million USD) Digital Model (Million USD) Economic Effect Investment Expenditures CAPEX 2.0 2.0 Reallocation of investments toward Bio- CNG infrastructure, blockchain systems and IIoT technologies without increasing total capital expenditures. Operating Costs Logistics and Maintenance Costs 0.50/year 0.30/year 40% reduction in operating costs through optimised logistics, biomethane utilisation and predictive maintenance. Revenue Enhancement Premium Price Effect – 0.10/year Additional revenue generated through blockchain-based quality verification and product traceability. Financial Performance Net Profit 0.40/year 0.70/year Increase in net profit by 75% (+0.30 million USD annually). Capital Efficiency ROI (%) 20% 35% Improvement in return on investment by 15 percentage points. Investment Recovery Payback Period (PBP) 5.0 years 2.8 years Reduction in payback period by 44%. 5. Discussion. The sustainability of the Ukrainian dairy sector under martial law depends directly on how quickly processing enterprises adapt to new technological advancements. Comparing the territorial deformation of the industry with the pre-war period, the identified regional concentration of production in Vinnytsia, Poltava, and Khmelnytskyi regions is a strategically justified response of agribusiness to exogenous risks. This study focuses on a qualitative change in the investment structure, prioritising not simply the expansion of capacities but ensuring their deep digital modernisation. In the context of the theoretical substantiation of the “farm-to-fork” model, which builds on Czeglédi’s (2025) ideas on the strategic importance of bioenergy in the agro- industrial complex, supplementing them with modern digital tools for managing capital expenditures is essential. Unlike Kelly et al. (2025) and Subbotina-Dubinski and Carbon (2025), who place significant emphasis on general financial support for innovative development, the model we developed focuses on technological quality verification as a direct tool for maximising the ROI indicator. However, it can offer an applied mechanism to overcome the “institutional trap” through the synergy of blockchain, the IIoT, and artificial intelligence. Compared to existing analogues, the main advantage of the author’s model is the convergence of CAPEX and the environmental component, which allows for considering biogas infrastructure (Bio-CNG) not as a separate environmental project, but as a tool for radically reducing logistics operating expenses (OPEX). Unlike standard automation systems, the proposed architecture uses blockchain not only to track commodity flows but also to serve as a financial guarantor of investment protection for a batch of raw materials, thereby minimising the risk of product rejection at the processing stage. An important feature of the model is the implementation of predictive asset protection systems based on AI modelling and digital twins, which enable transforming maintenance of expensive equipment from reactive to preventive, a critical need for Ukraine given its limited access to imported components. In addition, unlike rigid hierarchical management models, our development is based on agile management principles, ensuring high adaptability of logistics chains to military risks and personnel shortages. Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 53 The proposed digital architecture goes beyond classical automation, forming a holistic cost management ecosystem in which technological transparency is the main driver of domestic manufacturers’ entry into premium European markets. 6. Conclusions. Despite a full-scale invasion, the agricultural sector displays adaptive resilience. In 2024, the total milk production was 7,246.4 thousand tons. Analysis of the 2020–2024 balance revealed a significant reduction in consumption due to migration; however, the industrial processing volume increased by 666.7 thousand tons. In foreign trade, there has been a transition from import dependence to increased exports of high-value products, particularly butter and condensed milk, indicating the industry’s adaptation to crisis conditions. A pronounced regional concentration of dairy cattle breeding was identified, with Poltava, Vinnytsia, and Khmelnytsia taking leading positions. These regions emerged as the main centres for attracting capital investment (total investment in the sector reached USD 164.8 million). The territorial structure reflects the priority given to capacity modernisation in the central and western regions, which have become the main bases for raw material production, while the southern and eastern regions are in a state of depression owing to the destruction of infrastructure. A comprehensive architecture for the “farm-to-fork” model was developed based on the synergy of blockchain, IIoT, and artificial intelligence. The model provides end-to-end transparency: blockchain guarantees the security and verification of raw material origin, IoT sensors enable real-time monitoring, and AI modelling facilitates the implementation of forecasting methods. These processes transform operational activities into a managed investment process, in which each technological link is designed to minimise risks and protect the intellectual capital of dairy processing enterprises. The combination of physical asset management (CAPEX) with the implementation of Bio-CNG infrastructure is a key driver of the sustainability of dairy processing enterprises, especially amid rising energy prices. Using digital twins to justify investments in biogas production enables a radical reduction in operational logistics costs and ensures energy independence. Therefore, the digital modernisation of Ukraine’s dairy sector, integrated with principles of social and environmental responsibility, is the only effective mechanism for preserving capital and ensuring the competitiveness of domestic enterprises in the EU markets. Conflict of Interest Statement. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. Funding Disclosure. This research received no external funding. Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 54 REFERENCES Association of Milk Producers. (2025). Dairy map of Ukraine-2025: Achievements despite losses. Retrieved January 31, 2026, from https://avm-ua.org/uk/post/molocna-karta-ukraini-2025- zdobutki-popri-vtrati Belkin, I., Trapaidze, S., Bondarenko, V., Omelianenko, O., & Cherniavskyi, I. (2025). Sustainable Marketing of Ukrainian Agricultural Enterprises to Enter Global Grain Markets. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(2), 490. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2025.v14n2p490 Chikov, I., & Titov, D. (2025). Expert system for determining strategic directions for ensuring the stable functioning of agricultural enterprises and rural areas. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(4), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-4-238-251 Czeglédi, A. (2025). Underutilised crops drive socio-economic transformation in alternative food networks: a case study of diverse farm-to-table supply chains in Hungary. Agricultural and Food Economics, 13(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00376-4 European Commission. (2020). A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally- friendly food system (COM/2020/381 final). https://circular-cities-and- regions.ec.europa.eu/support-materials/eu-regulations-legislation/farm-fork-strategy-fair- healthy-and-environmentally Kazemi, M., & Valizadeh, R. (2025). Nutritional strategies for enhancing the quality of animal- derived food products. Discover Food, 6(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-025- 00759-y Kelly, A., Fox, P., & Cogan, T. (2025). From farm to table: The science of milk and dairy products. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197581025.001.0001 Koval, N., Kubai, O., & Germaniuk, N. (2025). Administration and marketing of anti-crisis management at the dairy plant as a strategic object during the wartime. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(2), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-2-328-337 Lohosha, R., Krychkovskyi, V., Moroz, Y., Kolesnyk, T., & Vakar, T. (2024). Methodology and engineering of a sustainable market model. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(1), 306. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n1p306 Manuelian, C. L., Such, X., Juan, B., & Milán, M. J. (2025). Is There a Potential Market for A2 Milk? Consumer Perception of Dairy Production and Consumption. Foods, 14(15), 2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152567 Marchi, B., Zavanella, L. E., & Zanoni, S. (2024). Inventory management for aging products with supply chain finance: the warehouse financing option. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58(19), 439– 444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.09.251 Mosiiuk, V., Misiuk, M., Zakhodym, M., & Susharnyk, Y. (2025). Market Analysis and Entrepreneurial Development of Dairy Farms in the Agricultural Sector. Economics Ecology Socium, 9(3), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2025.9.3-4 Mukherjee, S., Lalmuansangi, Yadav, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2026). Animal breeding program: Conventional system to sustainable production for food security in the genomic era. In Genetic and reproductive approaches for sustainable livestock production (pp. 95–122). Elsevier. Nitsenko, V., Tepliuk, M., Velychko, O., Koliadenko, S., Hanzhurenko, I., Melnichenko, O., & Moskvichenko, I. (2025). Revitalization of stevedoring activities, risk management and relocation of logistics processes in Ukrainian agribusiness. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport, 126, 171-188. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2025.126.11 Economics Ecology Socium e-ISSN 2786-8958 Volume 10 Issue 2 (2026) ISSN-L 2616-7107 55 Pidvalna, O., Kachala, T., & Romashchenko, K. (2022). Organizational, methodological and economic imperatives of developing an innovation strategy of a region’s sustainability on the basis of intellectual capacity building. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(1), 118– 125. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-1-118-125 Pollan, M. (2006). The omnivore’s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. Penguin Press. Popovych, O., Stepanenko, T., Didukh, S., Odnorog, M., & Krasnoselska, A. (2023). Problemas económicos y ecológicos del desarrollo agroindustrial. REICE Revista Electrónica de Investigación En Ciencias Económicas, 11(21), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5377/reice.v11i21.16516 Pravdiuk, N., Bondarenko, V., Pokynchereda, V., & Timchenko, O. (2021). Quality of financial reporting of the enterprise: Evaluation methodology. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n2p113 Serpeninova, Y., Lehenchuk, S., Zdyrko, N., Zakharov, D., & Podolianchuk, O. (2024). Revealing the contribution of corporate sustainability practices to financial performance: Case of BIST Sustainability 25 Index companies. Environmental Economics, 15(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(1).2024.10 Serrano-Torres, G. J., López-Naranjo, A. L., Larrea-Cuadrado, P. L., & Mazón-Fierro, G. (2025). Transformation of the Dairy Supply Chain Through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 17(3), 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030982 Soteriades, A. D., Gonzalez-Mejia, A. M., Styles, D., Foskolos, A., Moorby, J. M., & Gibbons, J. M. (2018). Effects of high-sugar grasses and improved manure management on the environmental footprint of milk production at the farm level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.206 State Customs Service of Ukraine. (2025). Statistics and registers. Retrieved January 31, 2026, from https://customs.gov.ua/en/statistika-ta-reiestri State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2025). Dairy Production by Region. https://data.gov.ua/dataset/f1267659-dfdd-4430-9c17-0dd2d8882da0 Stavska Y., Kopytko M., Chyrva O., Karvatska N., & Chyrva H. (2022). Agile management (management 3.0) as the basis of the management system in the conditions of globalization. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(1), 101– 106. https://doi.org/10.22937/ijcsns.2022.22.2.13 Subbotina-Dubinski, Y., & Carbon, C.-C. (2025). Envisioning the Future of Fine Dining: Insights from a Multi-Methods Study in Germany. Foods, 14(13), 2294. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132294 Tian, X., Wang, Q., Jian, J., Yang, X., & Li, Z. (2025). Small Molecular Organic Fluorescent Probes (SMOFPs) applied in food safety inspection from 2015 to 2025. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 73(31), 19174–19203. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5c05522 Waters, A. (2007). The art of simple food: Notes, lessons, and recipes from a delicious revolution. Clarkson Potter. Yin, J. (2025). Stimulating pro-environmental dining behaviours and intentions: an S–O–R model in farm-to-table restaurants. British Food Journal, 127(9), 3113–3131. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-11-2024-1118
id oai:ojs2.www.ees-journal.com:article-342
institution Economics Ecology Socium
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-07-01T01:00:35Z
publishDate 2026
publisher Dr. Viktor Koval
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv ees-journalcom/6f/787a62a1b7fe1411d67ff2451b33426f.pdf
spelling oai:ojs2.www.ees-journal.com:article-3422026-06-30T15:36:44Z Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems Furman, Irina Revkova, Anna Biletska, Nataliia Svynous, Nadiia Biogas, Blockchain, Dairy Industry, Investment Management, Supply Chain Management. Biogas, Blockchain, Dairy Industry, Investment Management, Supply Chain Management. Background. Logistical gaps and territorial deformations of production capacities create unprecedented challenges for the dairy industry. This requires modernising capital investment management by transitioning to strategic investment in intelligent control systems, revising financial mechanisms, and integrating environmental sustainability into the “from farm to fork” concept to ensure enterprise viability. Purpose. The purpose is to substantiate the development of a model for capital investment management by integrating end-to-end digital technologies into the “farm-to-fork” value chain, combining physical asset management (CAPEX) with the implementation of biogas (Bio-CNG) infrastructure. Findings. Analysis of the dynamics of gross milk production and investment activity in Ukraine in 2020–2024 revealed a deep structural transformation of the dairy market, characterised by a transition to intensive business models and the redistribution of production capacities toward the western and central regions. The strategic architecture of investment support enabled the formation of a holistic system of digital control over capital investments, ensuring the transition from spontaneous capacity renewal to strategic management of financial resources and increased enterprise competitiveness in the global dairy market. The use of AI-based predictive maintenance and digital twins optimises CAPEX and reduces OPEX by integrating renewable energy (Bio-CNG) into the logistics chain. The proposed model demonstrates how digital transparency creates premium value for products through eco-labelling and blockchain verification. The implementation of the Value-Chain Digital Control Model ensured a 75% increase in net profit, an increase in return on investment from 20% to 35% (by 15 percentage points), and a 44% reduction in the payback period (from 5 to 2.8 years). Implication. The dairy sector demonstrates adaptive resilience, with a trend toward producing high-value-added products for export. The developed digital architecture “from farm to fork” (Blockchain and Internet of Things) provides end-to-end quality control and protection of intellectual capital. The integration of bio-CNG infrastructure is a critical driver of energy independence and reduced logistics costs. Digital modernisation, combined with social and environmental responsibility, is identified as a priority mechanism for ensuring the competitiveness of Ukrainian dairy enterprises in the EU markets. Background. Logistical gaps and territorial deformations of production capacities create unprecedented challenges for the dairy industry. This requires modernising capital investment management by transitioning to strategic investment in intelligent control systems, revising financial mechanisms, and integrating environmental sustainability into the “from farm to fork” concept to ensure enterprise viability. Purpose. The purpose is to substantiate the development of a model for capital investment management by integrating end-to-end digital technologies into the “farm-to-fork” value chain, combining physical asset management (CAPEX) with the implementation of biogas (Bio-CNG) infrastructure. Findings. Analysis of the dynamics of gross milk production and investment activity in Ukraine in 2020–2024 revealed a deep structural transformation of the dairy market, characterised by a transition to intensive business models and the redistribution of production capacities toward the western and central regions. The strategic architecture of investment support enabled the formation of a holistic system of digital control over capital investments, ensuring the transition from spontaneous capacity renewal to strategic management of financial resources and increased enterprise competitiveness in the global dairy market. The use of AI-based predictive maintenance and digital twins optimises CAPEX and reduces OPEX by integrating renewable energy (Bio-CNG) into the logistics chain. The proposed model demonstrates how digital transparency creates premium value for products through eco-labelling and blockchain verification. The implementation of the Value-Chain Digital Control Model ensured a 75% increase in net profit, an increase in return on investment from 20% to 35% (by 15 percentage points), and a 44% reduction in the payback period (from 5 to 2.8 years). Implication. The dairy sector demonstrates adaptive resilience, with a trend toward producing high-value-added products for export. The developed digital architecture “from farm to fork” (Blockchain and Internet of Things) provides end-to-end quality control and protection of intellectual capital. The integration of bio-CNG infrastructure is a critical driver of energy independence and reduced logistics costs. Digital modernisation, combined with social and environmental responsibility, is identified as a priority mechanism for ensuring the competitiveness of Ukrainian dairy enterprises in the EU markets. Dr. Viktor Koval 2026-06-30 Article Article Peer-reviewed Article application/pdf https://ees-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/342 10.61954/2616-7107/2026.10.2-3 Economics Ecology Socium; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Economics Ecology Socium; 39-55 Економіка Екологія Соціум; Том 10 № 2 (2026): Economics Ecology Socium; 39-55 2616-7107 2616-7107 10.61954/2616-7107/2026.10.2 en https://ees-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/342/294 Copyright (c) 2026 Economics Ecology Socium https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Biogas
Blockchain
Dairy Industry
Investment Management
Supply Chain Management.
Furman, Irina
Revkova, Anna
Biletska, Nataliia
Svynous, Nadiia
Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems
title Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems
title_alt Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems
title_full Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems
title_fullStr Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems
title_full_unstemmed Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems
title_short Value-Chain Digital Control Model of Capital Investment Optimisation and Quality Assurance in Farm-To-Fork Systems
title_sort value-chain digital control model of capital investment optimisation and quality assurance in farm-to-fork systems
topic Biogas
Blockchain
Dairy Industry
Investment Management
Supply Chain Management.
topic_facet Biogas
Blockchain
Dairy Industry
Investment Management
Supply Chain Management.
Biogas
Blockchain
Dairy Industry
Investment Management
Supply Chain Management.
url https://ees-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/342
work_keys_str_mv AT furmanirina valuechaindigitalcontrolmodelofcapitalinvestmentoptimisationandqualityassuranceinfarmtoforksystems
AT revkovaanna valuechaindigitalcontrolmodelofcapitalinvestmentoptimisationandqualityassuranceinfarmtoforksystems
AT biletskanataliia valuechaindigitalcontrolmodelofcapitalinvestmentoptimisationandqualityassuranceinfarmtoforksystems
AT svynousnadiia valuechaindigitalcontrolmodelofcapitalinvestmentoptimisationandqualityassuranceinfarmtoforksystems