Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material

For 2D composite material geometrically composed %presentedby an interior of ellipse $E_1$ (with semi-axes $a_1$, $b_1$) and anouter elliptical ring with an outer ellipse $E_2$ (with semi-axes$a_2$, $b_2$), where $E_1$ and $E_2$ are confocal ellipses; it isdetermined in an analytic form the $x$-comp...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2015
Автори та афіліації:
  • S. V. Gryshchuk
Ключові слова:keywords
Автор: Gryshchuk, S. V.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Інститут математики НАН України 2015
Онлайн доступ:https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/article/view/172
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Transactions of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Transactions of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine
_version_ 1872552691419316224
author Gryshchuk, S. V.
Gryshchuk, S. V.
author_facet Gryshchuk, S. V.
Gryshchuk, S. V.
author_institution_txt_mv [ { "author": "S. V. Gryshchuk", "institution": null } ]
author_sort Gryshchuk, S. V.
baseUrl_str https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2018-01-23T12:10:05Z
description For 2D composite material geometrically composed %presentedby an interior of ellipse $E_1$ (with semi-axes $a_1$, $b_1$) and anouter elliptical ring with an outer ellipse $E_2$ (with semi-axes$a_2$, $b_2$), where $E_1$ and $E_2$ are confocal ellipses; it isdetermined in an analytic form the $x$-component of the effectiveconductivity tensor as a sum of convergent power series withcoefficients depending on conductivities of the components of thecomposite material and geometrical characteristics $a_1$, $b_1$ and$a_2$, $b_2$.
first_indexed 2026-08-04T01:03:27Z
format Article
fulltext Збiрник праць Iн-ту математики НАН України 2015, том 12, № 3, 121–132 УДК 517.9 + 532.546 S.V. Gryshchuk (Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv) Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material gryshchuk@imath.kiev.ua For 2D composite material geometrically composed by an interior of ellipse E1 (with semi-axes a1, b1) and an outer elliptical ring with an outer ellipse E2 (with semi-axes a2, b2), where E1 and E2 are confocal ellipses; it is determined in an analytic form the x-component of the effective conductivity tensor as a sum of convergent power series with coefficients depending on conductivities of the components of the composite material and geometrical characteristics a1, b1 and a2, b2. Для двовимiрного композицiйного матерiалу, що геометрично утворе- ний внутрiшнiстю елiпса E1 з пiвосями a1, b1 та прилеглим елiптич- ним кiльцем з зовнiшнiм елiпсом E2 з пiвосями a2, b2, а E1 та E2 ма- ють спiльнi фокуси, одержано аналiтичний вираз x-компоненти тен- зору ефективної провiдностi у виглядi суми збiжного числового ряду, коефiцiєнти якого залежать вiд провiдностей компонентiв композиту та геометричних характеристик a1, b1 та a2, b2. Для плоского композиционного материала, геометрически образован- ного внутренностью эллипса E1 с полуосями a1, b1 и прилежащим эл- липтическим кольцом с внешним эллипсом E2 с полуосями a2, b2, а E1 и E2 имеют общие фокусы, получено аналитическое выражение x-компоненты тензора эффективной проводимости в виде суммы схо- дящего числового ряда, коэффициенты которого зависят от проводи- мостей компонент композита и геометрических характеристик a1, b1 и a2, b2. c⃝ Institute of Mathematics, 2015 122 S. V. Gryshchuk Keywords: 2D composites, ellipse – elliptical ring composite, heat conduction, R-linear problem, effective conductivity MSC: 74A40, 74G10, 30E25 1. Introduction. Circular type 2D mechanical structures are subject of long investigations. In the pioneering work [8] (see also [9]) it had been found a complete solution of the problem of torsion and bending of elastic cylindric body reinforced by parallel cylindric beems Sk, k = 1, . . . ,m, of different materials. The author showed that this problem is equivalent to certain mathematical problem, which can be formulated in the following form. Problem M. Let Sk, k = 0, 1, . . . ,m, are simple connected domains of the complex plane C with smooth boundaries C0, C1, . . . , Cm, such that the contour C0 embraces any contour Ck, k = 1, . . . ,m. Let S := S0 \∪m k=1Sk. The problem is to find a function φ which harmonic in S, continuous in cl(S0) and such that its normal derivative has a given jump on each contour Ck, k = 0, 1, . . . ,m. Here and anywhere cl(G) denote a closure of any domain G ⊂ C. In [8], it was proved that the problem is equivalent to a system of m+ 1 Fredholm integral equations of the second kind which has solutions under some solvability conditions and the solution is unique up to an additive constant. The main aim of this article is to calculate some elastic characteristics of this elastic cylindric body reinforced by parallel cylindric beams. One of these is, so-called, elastic torsional rigidity, which, mathematically, is a real valued functional depending on the solution of the latter problem. Although, the solution of the problem M is a solution of a system of Fredholm integral equations of the second kind, from the practical point of view we have evident difficulties to get its explicit expressions. Therefore, for the practice it is interesting any partial case of problem M which allows to find a method for its solving in an explicit form. For example, in case when m = k = 1 and S0 and S are disks (or what is equivalent S′ 0 and S′ are disks with common origin ) the problem M, is solved by the direct method based on expansions in Taylor’s and Laurent series of a function f(z), which is analytic in S′ 1 ∪ S′, S′ = S′ 0 \ cl (S′ 1). The function f(z) is such that its real part Ref equals to an unknown required function φ in S′ 1 ∪ S′. By using this solution the elastic torsional rigidity is calculated in an explicit form in [11]. The case when m = k = 1 and S0 and S are Effective Conductivity of Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite . . . 123 confocal ellipses has been considered in [10]. The proposed method in this paper is based on the reduction of Problem M for confocal ellipses to similar boundary value problem but for two bounded rings, therefore, the method of solution of the latter problem based on conformal technique, which maps our ellipses, by using an analytic function of Zhukovskii type, to disks and after using Laurent expansions. See also [5], where the method of functional equation (cf., [6]) is developed to derive analytical approximate formulae for the effective conductivity tensor of the two-dimensional composites with elliptical inclusions which number is greater then two. The aim of present paper is to solve a problem similar to Problem M when m = k = 1 and S0 and S are bounded by confocal ellipses E1 = C1 and E2 = C0, describing the 2D composite material with the elliptical inclusion, geometrically represented by a simply connected domain bounded by the ellipse E1, and the matrix, geometrically represented by the elliptical annulus S bounded by two ellipses E1 and E2. On the base of this solution, we calculate an analog of the elastic torsional rigidity, which is a x-component of, so-called, Effective Conductivity Tensor (see, e.g., [2, 4]). More precisely, we consider the problem of determination of the temperature distribution under perfect contact condition in the above described inhomogeneous media loaded by a simple heat flow. Note, that this problem is equivalent to the R-linear conjugation problem on the complex plane (see [6, p. 45]). Note, that for a case of disk–ring composite material in [3] it was delivered for x-component of the effective conductivity tensor its exactly expression in terms of radius r of the internal disk and so-called contrast parameter ρ introduced by Bergmann [1] in the form of geometrical progression with respect to the powers of r2. 2. Definitions and formulation of the problem. Let C be the field of complex numbers and the complex plane, R be the field of real numbers. For any ξ from C or R denote by |ξ| its modulus. For any z ∈ C denote by Re z its real part, and by (η, θ), 0 < η < ∞, 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π its polar coordinates, thus, z = η exp{iθ}. Let Ω be an open or closed domain in C and let τ : Ω −→ R be a real valued function, then Ck(Ω), k ∈ 1, 2, . . . , denotes a class of functions having continuous partial derivatives up to k-th order. If τ ∈ C2(Ω) then ∆τ(x+ iy) := ∂2τ ∂x2 + ∂2τ ∂y2 . 124 S. V. Gryshchuk Let G and Go, G $ Go, are simply connected domains in C. For any function u : Go −→ R by u1 and u2 we mean its restrictions, respectively, to G and G̃ := Go \ cl(G), i.e., u1 := u|G и u1 := u|G̃. Denote by E1 and E2, respectively, boundaries of G and Go, i.e, E1 = ∂G, E2 = ∂Go. Thus, ∂G̃ = E1 ∪ E2. Problem A for the system of domains (G, G̃) is a problem on finding a pair of real-valued functions u = (u1, u2), where u1 ∈ C2(G) ∩ C1(cl(G)) and u2 ∈ C2(G̃ ) ∩ C1(G̃ ), satisfying the following system of equations ∆u(z) = 0 ∀z ∈ G ∪ G̃, u2(t) = −Re t ∀t ∈ E2, u1(t) = u2(t) ∀t ∈ E1, λ1 ∂u1 ∂n (t) = λ2 ∂u2 ∂n (t) ∀t ∈ E1, (1) where λ1 and λ2 are positive constants such, that the Bergmann’s contrast parameter (see [1]) ρ := (λ1 + λ2) −1(λ1 − λ2) is different from zero (it is well known, that −1 < ρ < 1); u1(t) and u2(t) denote, the limiting on E1 values of, respectively, u1(z), z ∈ G, and u2(z), z ∈ G̃; ∂u1 ∂n and ∂u2 ∂n denote, respectively, the outward normal derivative of u1 with respect to the boundary E1 of the domain G and the inward normal derivative of u2 with respect to the connected component E1 of the boundary ∂G̃ of G̃. Note, that Problem (1) (cf., e.g., [6, p. 45] with λ2 = 1) can be reduced to the following R-linear conjugation problem: to find two functions ϕ : G ∪ G̃ −→ C, ϕ0 : C ∪ {∞} −→ C, ϕ0(∞) = 0, such that ϕ is analytic in G ∪ G̃, ϕ0 is analytic in extGo := {z ∈ C : z ∈ cl(Go)} and continuous in cl(extGo), functions ϕ and ϕ0 satisfy the following conjugation conditions ϕ+(t) = ϕ−(t)− ρϕ−(t) ∀t ∈ E1, ϕ−(t) = ϕ0(t)− ϕ0(t)− t ∀t ∈ E2, (2) where ϕ+(t) and ϕ+(t), t ∈ E1, is boundary values of ϕ(z), accordingly, from G, G̃, u+ iv := u− iv for u, v ∈ R. In [7], it has been considered the problem of disturbance of a complex potential after insertion of a foreign inclusion in the form of a two- phase confocal elliptical annulus into a homogeneous medium. There were investigated the cases of an arbitrary distribution of singularities. Our aim is to calculate an x-component of the effective conductivity tensor ( see, e.g. [4]), i.e. a quantity λxeff , satisfying the following equality F xλxeff = λ1 ∫ G ∂ u1 ∂x dx dy + λ2 ∫ G̃ ∂ u2 ∂x dx dy, (3) Effective Conductivity of Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite . . . 125 where u(x, y) = (u1(x, y), u2(x, y)) ≡ (u1(x+ iy), u2(x+ iy)) is a solution of Problem A for the system of domains (G, G̃), F x is a complete flux in x-direction. For any ϵ > 0 by Dϵ denote a disk {ζ ∈ C : |ζ| < ϵ}, γϵ means a circle {ζ ∈ C : |ζ| = ϵ}. For a pair of positive real numbers r1, r2, r1 < r2, denote by Ar1,r2 the set {ζ ∈ C : r1 < |ζ| < r2}. In [3], a quantity (3) is calculated in an exactly form for the system of domains (Dr, Ar,1), 0 < r < 1, as a functional depending of r, analytically expressed as a sum of geometrical progression with respect to powers of r2. Assume further, that a boundary ∂Go of a domain Go is an ellipse E2 with semi-axes a2, b2, a2 > b2, ∂G is an ellipse E1 with semi-axes a1, b1, a1 > b1, moreover, ellipses E1 and E2 have common focuses F1 = −c and F2 = c, where c = √ a22 − b22 = √ a21 − b21. Then a2 > a1, b2 > b1, 2c is the focus distance, G̃ is an elliptical ring bounded by ellipses E1 and E2. 3. Аuxiliary A–problem. Denote by n = a1 + b1, m = c a1 + b1 < 1, R = a2 + b2 a1 + b1 > 1. (4) Consider a mapping ω : C \ {ζ ∈ C : |ζ| ≤ m} −→ C \ [F1, F2], [F1, F2] := {x : −c ≤ x ≤ c} defined by z = x+ iy =: ω(ζ) ≡ n 2 ( ζ + m2 ζ ) . (5) Obviously, that the mapping (5) is an analytic function, thus, it is one- to-one correspondence and the following formulae hold x = x(η, θ) ≡ n 2 ( η + m2 η ) cos θ, y = y(η, θ) ≡ n 2 ( η − m2 η ) sin θ, (6) where ζ = η exp{iθ}. If a point ζ = η exp{iθ} runs through the circle γm, then ω(ζ) twice runs through the segment [F1, F2] and the following equality holds ω (m exp{iθ}) = ω (m exp{−iθ}) , 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π. (7) Valid the following equalities ω (Am,1) = G \ [F1F2], ω(γ1) = E1, ω(A1,R) = G̃, ω(γR) = E2. (8) 126 S. V. Gryshchuk Let f(z) be analytic in G ∪ G̃ function such, that Ref(z) = u(z) is a solution of the system (1). Then the function g(ζ) := f(ω(ζ)) is analytic in Am,1 ∪ A1,R and a system (1) for a function u(ζ) ≡ v(ζ) := Re g(ζ), taking in account equalities (6) and (8), transforms to the form ∆v(ζ) = 0 ∀ζ ∈ Am,1 ∪A1,R, v2(ζ) = −n 2 ( R+ m2 R ) cos θ ∀ζ = R exp{iθ} ∈ γR, v1(ζ) = v2(ζ) ∀ζ ∈ γ1, λ1 ∂v1(η exp{iθ}) ∂η ∣∣∣ η=1 = λ2 ∂v2(η exp{iθ}) ∂η ∣∣∣ η=1 ∀θ ∈ [0, 2π]. (9) A problem on finding a function v = (v1, v2), where v1 ∈ C2(Am,1) ∩ C1(cl(Am,1)) and v2 ∈ C2(A1,R) ∩ C1(cl(A1,R)), which satisfy the system of equations (9) call an auxiliary A–problem. Using analyticity of g1 := g|Am,1 and g2 := g|A1,R , respectively, in Am,1 and A1,R, we have the following expansions in the Laurents’s series g1(ζ) = a′0 + ib′0 + ∞∑ k=−∞, k ̸=0 (a′k + ib′k)ζ k ∀ζ ∈ Am,1, (10) g2(ζ) = a′′0 + ib′′0 + ∞∑ k=−∞, k ̸=0 (a′′k + ib′′k)ζ k ∀ζ ∈ A1,R, (11) where a′k, a ′′ k , b′k, b ′′ k , k = ±1,±2, . . . , denote unknown real numbers. Going to real parts in (10) and (11), obtain formulas v1(ζ) = a′0 + ∞∑ k=1 ( a′kη k + a′−kη −k ) cos(kθ)− − ∞∑ k=1 ( b′kη k − b′−kη −k ) sin(kθ) ∀ζ = η exp{iθ} ∈ Am,1, (12) v2(ζ) = a′′0 + ∞∑ k=1 ( a′′kη k + a′′−kη −k ) cos(kθ)− − ∞∑ k=1 ( b′′kη k − b′′−kη −k ) sin(kθ) ∀ζ = η exp{iθ} ∈ A1,R. (13) Effective Conductivity of Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite . . . 127 Since ω maps exterior extDm of the disk Dm in the complex plane of the variable ζ to the complex plane of the variable z with a cut along the segment [F1, F2], then the problem (1) is equivalent to auxiliary A– problem if and only if when the function (10) has coinciding limiting values on different sides of the cut γm, which, by virtue of the formula (7), is equivalent to the validity of the following equality g1 (m exp{iθ}) = g1 (m exp{−iθ}) , 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π, which in turn leads equalities a′−k = m2ka′k, b′−k = m2kb′k, k = 1, 2, . . . . (14) Substituting (13) with η = R to the second condition in (9), obtain a′′0 = 0, a′′−1 = −n 2 ( R2 +m2 ) −R2a′′1 , (15) a′′−k = −R2ka′′k , k = 2, 3, . . . , b′′−k = R2kb′′k , k = 1, 2, . . . . (16) Substituting equalities (12) — (15) with η = 1 to the third condition in (9), obtain a′0 = 0, a′1 = 1−R2 1 +m2 a′′1 − n 2 R2 +m2 1 +m2 , (17) a′k = 1−R2k 1 +m2k a′′k , k = 2, 3, . . . , b′k = 1−R2k 1−m2k b′′k , k = 1, 2, . . . . (18) Now the equality (12) by using the relations (14), (17) and (18), turns to the form v1(ζ) = ( 1−R2 1 +m2 a′′1 − n 2 R2 +m2 1 +m2 )( η + m2 η ) cos θ+ + ∞∑ k=2 1−R2k 1 +m2k a′′k ( ηk + m2k ηk ) cos kθ− − ∞∑ k=1 1−R2k 1−m2k b′′k ( ηk − m2k ηk ) sin kθ ∀ζ = η exp{iθ} ∈ Am,1. (19) Taking into account (15) and (16) we rewrite (13) in the form v2(ζ) = ( a′′1η − (n 2 (R2 +m2) +R2a′′1 ) η−1 ) cos θ+ 128 S. V. Gryshchuk + ∞∑ k=2 a′′k ( ηk − R2k ηk ) cos kθ− − ∞∑ k=1 b′′k ( ηk − R2k ηk ) sin kθ ∀ζ = η exp{iθ} ∈ A1,R. (20) Substituting delivered equalities (19) and (20) to the fourth condition in (9), obtain, after division on λ1 + λ2, the following relations(( 1 +m2R2 ) ρ−m2 −R2 ) a′′1 = n 2 (R2 +m2)(1−m2ρ), (21) (( 1 +m2kR2k ) ρ−m2k −R2k ) a′′k = 0, k = 2, 3, . . . , (22)(( 1−m2kR2k ) ρ+m2k −R2k ) b′′k = 0, k = 1, 2, . . . . (23) Since ρ < 1, (1 +m2kR2k)−1(m2k +R2k) > 1, k = 1, 2, . . . , (24) and the modulus of the expression (1−m2kR2k)−1(R2k −m2k) is greater then one for all natural k by virtue of inequalities m < 1 and R > 1, then relations (21) — (23) implies equalities a′′1 = n 2 ( R2 +m2 ) ( 1−m2ρ ) (1 +m2R2)ρ−m2 −R2 , a′′k = b′′k−1 = 0, k = 2, 3, . . . . (25) Substituting now (25) in (15) and (16), obtain equalities a′′−1 = −n 2 (R2 +m2)(ρ−m2) (1 +m2R2)ρ−m2 −R2 , a′′−k = 0, k = 2, 3, . . . . (26) Substituting expressions for a′′1 and b′′k from (25) to the (17) and (16), obtain a′1 = n 2 (R2 +m2)(1− ρ) (1 +m2R2)ρ−m2 −R2 , b′′−k = 0, k = 1, 2, . . . . (27) Substituting expression for a′1 from (27) to the (14) with k = 1, obtain a′−1 = n 2 m2(R2 +m2)(1− ρ) (1 +m2R2)ρ−m2 −R2 . (28) Effective Conductivity of Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite . . . 129 Using (25) rewrite formulae (18) and (14) in the form a′k = = a′−k = 0, k = 2, 3, . . . , b′k = b′−k = 0, k = 1, 2, . . . . Thus, substituting delivered relations to the formulas (12) and (13), obtain a solution of the auxiliary A–problem with additional condition (14) in the form v1(ζ) = (1− ρ)ψ(ρ) n 2 ( η + m2 η ) cos θ ∀ζ = η exp{iθ} ∈ Am,1, (29) v2(ζ) = ψ(ρ) n 2 ( η + m2 η − ( m2η + η−1 ) ρ ) cos θ ∀ζ = η exp{iθ} ∈ A1,R, (30) where ψ(ρ) := (R2 +m2) ( (1 +m2R2)ρ−m2 −R2 )−1. 4. Solution of A–problem for a system of domains bounded by confocal ellipses. Now summarizing results of the latter section we can state the following theorem. Theorem 1. Let A–Problem posed to the system of domains (G, G̃) bounded by confocal ellipses E1 (inner) and E2 (outer), accordingly, with semi-axes a1, b1, a1 > b1, and a2, b2, a2 > b2, relations (4) hold. Then A–Problem for the system of domains (G, G̃) is equivalent to the auxiliary A–problem if and only if when fulfilled a condition (14), where v1 = Re g1 and g1 is expressed by the formula (10). Then these problems are uniquely solvable and the following formulas hold u(z) = v(ζ), z = x+ iy ≡ ω(ζ). (31) A general solution v = (v1, v2) of the auxiliary A–problem is expressed by the formulae (29) and (30). Furthermore, the boundary values for any θ ∈ [0, 2π] have the form v1(exp{iθ}) = v2(exp{iθ}) ≡ vγ1(θ) := n 2 (1− ρ)ψ(ρ) ( 1 +m2 ) cos θ, (32) v2(R exp{iθ}) ≡ vγR (θ) := n 2 ψ(ρ) ( R+ m2 R − ( m2R+ 1 R ) ρ ) cos θ. (33) A general solution of A–Problem for the system of domains (G, G̃) in coordinates (x, y) has a form u1(z) = ψ(ρ)(1− ρ)x ∀z = x+ iy ∈ G, (34) 130 S. V. Gryshchuk u2(z) = ψ(ρ) (x− x′ρ) ∀z = x+ iy ∈ G̃, (35) where x′ = Reω(ζ−1), z = ω(ζ). 5. Effective conductivity. In the considered case x-component F x of the complete flux can be normalized as follows F x = −πa2b2 (see [6]). Theorem 2. Under assumptions of Theorem 1 x-component of the effective conductivity tensor is expressed by the formula λxeff = λ2 P1(ρ) R2 +m2 m2 +R2 − ρ(1 +m2R2) , (36) where P1(ρ) := n2 4 a2b2 ( R2 − m4 R2 + ( 1−m4 −m2R2 + m2 R2 ) ρ ) . Furthermore, the function (3) is the sum of the following convergent series λxeff = λ2 P1(ρ) ( 1 + ∞∑ k=1 ρk ( 1 +m2R2 m2 +R2 )k ) . (37) Proof. By the Green’s formula F xλxeff = λ1 ∮ E1 u1(x, y) dy + λ2 (∮ E2 − ∮ E1 ) u2(x, y) dy = = ∮ E1 (λ1u1(x, y)− λ2u2(x, y)) dy + λ2 ∮ E2 u2(x, y) dy, where in contour integrals the orientation is assumed to be opposite to the clockwise direction. Doing a change of variables (6) with using of the relations (8), (32) and (33), obtain F xλxeff = (λ1 − λ2) 2π∫ 0 vγ1(θ) dy(1, θ) + λ2 2π∫ 0 vγR(θ) dy(R, θ) = = n2 4 ψ(ρ) 2π∫ 0 (cos θ) 2 dθ ( (1− ρ)(λ1 − λ2)(1−m4) + + λ2 ( R2 − m4 R2 ) − λ2ρ ( R− m2 R )( m2R+ 1 R )) . Effective Conductivity of Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite . . . 131 Substituting equalities (1 − ρ)(λ1 − λ2) = 2λ2ρ, ∫ 2π 0 (cos θ)2 dθ = π to the last formula, and doing elementary transformations with using of the expressions of ψ(ρ) and F x, obtain the required equality (36). Then the equality (37) follows from the obtained formula after substitution to it the following series expansion R2 +m2 m2 +R2 − ρ(1 +m2R2) = 1 + ∞∑ k=1 ρk ( 1 +m2R2 m2 +R2 )k , (38) which is valid due to the inequalities (24) with k = 1. The proof is completed. The author is grateful to Prof. S.A. Rogosin for the attention to the work. References [1] Bergmann D.J. The dielectric constants of a composite material – a problem in classical physics // Int. Journ.Phys. Rep. C. — 1978. — 43. — P. 377 – 407. [2] Cherkaev A., Pruss A. Effective conductivity of spiral and other radial symmetric assemblages // Int. Journ. Mechanics of Materials. — 2013. — 65. — P. 103 – 109. [3] Gryshchuk S., Rogosin S. Effective Conductivity of 2D Disk - Ring Composite Material // Int. Journ. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis. — 2013. — 18, No. 3. — P. 386 – 394, [4] Milton G.W. The Theory of Composites. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. [5] Mityushev V. Conductivity of a two-dimensional composite containing elliptical inclusions // Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. — 2009. — 465, No. 2110. — P. 2991 – 3010. [6] Mityushev V.V., Rogosin S.V. Constructive methods to linear and non- linear boundary value problems of the analytic function. Theory and applications. — Chapman & Hall / CRC, Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2000. [7] Fadeev A.V. Solution of a problem of R-linear conjugation for confocal elliptical annulus in the class of piecewise meromorphic functions // Russian Mathematics. — 2013. — 57, No. 6. — P. 39 – 52 132 S. V. Gryshchuk [8] Muskhelishvili N.I. On the problem of torsion and bending of elastic beams composed of different materials // Izvestiya Akad. Nauk SSSR., Ser. Mat. and Nat. Sci. — 1932. — No.7. — P. 907 – 945 (in Russian). [9] Muskhelishvili N.I. Some basic problems of the mathematical theory of elasticity. Fundamental equations, plane theory of elasticity, torsion and bending., English transl. from the 4th Russian edition (R. M. Radok). — Leiden: Noordhoff International Publishing, 1977. [10] Vekua I.N., A.K. Rukhadze Torsion and transversal bending of the beam compounded by two materials restricted by confocal ellipses // Prikladnaya Matematika i Mechanika (Leningrad). — 1933. — No. 1. — P. 167 – 178 (in Russian). [11] Vekua I.N., Rukhadze A.K. The problem of the torsion of a circular cylinder reinforced by transversal circular beam // Izvestiya Akad. Nauk SSSR., Ser. Mat. and Nat. Sci. — 1933. — No. 3. — P. 373 – 386 (in Russian).
id oai:trim.imath.kiev.ua:article-172
institution Transactions of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-08-04T01:03:27Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv trimimathkievua/03/8952953428d6b5eab24a5fbbaca85803.pdf
spelling oai:trim.imath.kiev.ua:article-1722018-01-23T12:10:05Z Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material Gryshchuk, S. V. Gryshchuk, S. V. For 2D composite material geometrically composed %presentedby an interior of ellipse $E_1$ (with semi-axes $a_1$, $b_1$) and anouter elliptical ring with an outer ellipse $E_2$ (with semi-axes$a_2$, $b_2$), where $E_1$ and $E_2$ are confocal ellipses; it isdetermined in an analytic form the $x$-component of the effectiveconductivity tensor as a sum of convergent power series withcoefficients depending on conductivities of the components of thecomposite material and geometrical characteristics $a_1$, $b_1$ and$a_2$, $b_2$. Інститут математики НАН України 2015-04-23 Article Article application/pdf https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/article/view/172 Transactions of Institute of Mathematics, the NAS of Ukraine; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2015): Analysis and Applications; 121–132 Сборник Трудов Института математики НАН Украины; Том 12 № 3 (2015): Анализ и приложения; 121–132 Збірник Праць Інституту математики НАН України; Том 12 № 3 (2015): Аналіз та застосування; 121–132 3083-7529 1815-2910 en https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/article/view/172/140 Авторське право (c) 2015 Праці Інституту математики НАН України
spellingShingle Gryshchuk, S. V.
Gryshchuk, S. V.
Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material
title Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material
title_full Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material
title_fullStr Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material
title_full_unstemmed Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material
title_short Effective Conductivity of 2D Ellipse – Elliptical Ring Composite Material
title_sort effective conductivity of 2d ellipse – elliptical ring composite material
url https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/article/view/172
work_keys_str_mv AT gryshchuksv effectiveconductivityof2dellipseellipticalringcompositematerial
AT gryshchuksv effectiveconductivityof2dellipseellipticalringcompositematerial