Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations

We find the complete equivalence group of a class of (1+1)-dimensional second-order evolution equations, which is infinite-dimensional.The equivariant moving frame methodology is invoked to construct, in the regular case of the normalization procedure, a moving frame for a group related...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2019
Hauptverfasser: Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, E., Bihlo, A., Popovych, R., Дос Сантос Кардозо-Біло, E., Біло, А., Попович, Р.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Інститут математики НАН України 2019
Online Zugang:https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/article/view/367
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Transactions of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Institution

Transactions of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine
_version_ 1872552862781800448
author Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, E.
Bihlo, A.
Popovych, R.
Дос Сантос Кардозо-Біло, E.
Біло, А.
Попович, Р.
author_facet Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, E.
Bihlo, A.
Popovych, R.
Дос Сантос Кардозо-Біло, E.
Біло, А.
Попович, Р.
author_institution_txt_mv [ { "author": "E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo", "institution": "Memorial University of Newfoundland" }, { "author": "A. Bihlo", "institution": "Memorial University of Newfoundland" }, { "author": "R. Popovych", "institution": "Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine; Universitat Wien" } ]
author_sort Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, E.
baseUrl_str https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-08-13T08:52:53Z
description We find the complete equivalence group of a class of (1+1)-dimensional second-order evolution equations, which is infinite-dimensional.The equivariant moving frame methodology is invoked to construct, in the regular case of the normalization procedure, a moving frame for a group related to the equivalence group in the context of equivalence transformations among equations of the class under consideration.Using the moving frame constructed, we describe the algebra of differential invariants of the former group by obtaining a minimum generating set of differential invariants and a complete set of independent operators of invariant differentiation.
first_indexed 2026-08-04T01:06:11Z
format Article
fulltext Çáiðíèê ïðàöü Iíñòèòóòó ìàòåìàòèêè ÍÀÍ Óêðà¨íè 2019, ò. 16, � 1, 50�65 ÓÄÊ 517.912:512.816 Di�erential invariants for a class of di�usion equations E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo †, A. Bihlo †, R.O. Popovych ‡ † Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada E-mail: ecardosobihlo@mun.ca, abihlo@mun.ca ‡ Universit�at Wien, Austria Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv E-mail: rop@imath.kiev.ua Çíàéäåíî ïîâíó ãðóïó åêâiâàëåíòíîñòi êëàñó (1+1)-âèìiðíèõ åâîëþöié- íèõ ðiâíÿíü äðóãîãî ïîðÿäêó, ÿêà âèÿâèëàñÿ íåñêií÷åííîâèìiðíîþ. Ìå- òîäîëîãiþ åêâiâàðiàíòíèõ ðóõîìèõ ðåïåðiâ çàñòîñîâàíî ó ðåãóëÿðíîìó âèïàäêó ïðîöåäóðè íîðìàëiçàöi¨ äî ïîáóäîâè ðóõîìîãî ðåïåðà ãðóïè, ïîâ'ÿçàíî¨ ç ãðóïîþ åêâiâàëåíòíîñòi â êîíòåêñòi ïåðåòâîðåíü åêâiâà- ëåíòíîñòi ìiæ ðiâíÿííÿìè êëàñó. Çà äîïîìîãîþ ïîáóäîâàíîãî ðóõîìîãî ðåïåðà îïèñàíî àëãåáðó äèôåðåíöiàëüíèõ iíâàðiàíòiâ öi¹¨ ãðóïè ÷åðåç îòðèìàííÿ ìiíiìàëüíî¨ ãåíåðóþ÷î¨ ìíîæèíè äèôåðåíöiàëüíèõ iíâàði- àíòiâ i ïîâíî¨ ìíîæèíè îïåðàòîðiâ iíâàðiàíòíîãî äèôåðåíöiþâàííÿ. We �nd the complete equivalence group of a class of (1+1)-dimensional second-order evolution equations, which is in�nite-dimensional. The equi- variant moving frame methodology is invoked to construct, in the regular case of the normalization procedure, a moving frame for a group related to the equivalence group in the context of equivalence transformations among equations of the class under consideration. Using the moving frame constructed, we describe the algebra of di�erential invariants of the former group by obtaining a minimum generating set of di�erential invariants and a complete set of independent operators of invariant di�erentiation. 1. Introduction. Invariants and differential invariants of transfor- mation groups, in particular, point symmetry groups admitted by sys- tems of differential equations have a wide range of applications and are therefore an intensively investigated subject. Differential invariants play a central role in the invariant parameterization problem [1, 2, 30] and in the problem of invariant discretization [3, 5, 7]. They are also used to Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations 51 construct invariant differential equations and invariant variational prob- lems [22, 23], as well as in computer vision, integrable systems, classical invariant theory and the calculus of variations [6, 22, 24]. Rather recently, finding differential invariants in problems related to group classification became a research topic of interest. The idea is to compute the differential invariants not for the point symmetry group of a single system of differential equations but for the equivalence group admitted by a class of such systems. The primary motivation for such a survey is to study the equivalence of systems of differential equations. Exploring equivalence, it is possible to explicitly determine point trans- formations among systems from a class [28]. Such a mapping between two systems of differential equations is especially helpful if wide sets of exact solutions are known for one of the systems involved. These solutions then can be mapped to solutions of the equivalent system. An- other case of particular interest is the mapping between nonlinear and linear elements of a class of systems of differential equations [19]. For the solution of the equivalence problem, finding differential invariants for the equivalence group is a main ingredient. There are a number of papers where some low-order differential invariants of the equivalence groups of various physically relevant classes of systems of differential equations were computed using the Lie infinitesimal method; see, e.g., [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 32, 33, 34, 35] and references therein. In the present paper we will be concerned with differential invariants for a group1 related to the equivalence group of the class of diffusion equations ut = uxx + f(u, ux) (1) in the context of equivalence transformations among equations of this class. This subject was originally considered in [32], using the infinitesi- mal method and restricting the order of differential invariants up to two. We revisit the construction of differential invariants for the class (1) from the very beginning, analyzing differential invariants of which group should be found. Then, we apply the method of equivariant moving frames in the formulation originally proposed and formulated by Fels and Olver [9, 10], which was later generalized to infinite-dimensional Lie (pseudo)groups in [6, 25, 26], and this is the setting that is needed 1In fact, this object and the “equivalence group” of the class (1) are Lie pseu- dogroups of locally defined point transformations. We use the term “group” for brevity since this does not lead to any confusion. 52 E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, A. Bihlo, R.O. Popovych to study differential invariants for the class (1). The advantage of mo- ving frames is that they allow for a canonical process of invariantization, which associates to each object, such as functions, differential functions, differential forms and total differentiation operators, its invariant coun- terpart. For the problem of finding differential invariants of a Lie trans- formation (pseudo)group, this property is especially convenient. The invariantization of the jet-space coordinate functions yields the so-called normalized differential invariants. The invariantized coordinate func- tions whose transformed counterparts were involved in the construction of the corresponding moving frame via the normalization procedure are equal to the respective constants chosen in the course of normalization. This is why these objects are called phantom normalized differential in- variants. The non-phantom normalized differential invariants constitute a complete set of functionally independent differential invariants. As a further asset, the method of moving frames also permits to study the algebra of differential invariants by deriving relations, called syzygies, between invariant derivatives of non-phantom normalized differential in- variants. Finding syzygies can aid in the establishment of a minimum generating set of differential invariants. See e.g. [6, 8, 22, 25, 26] for more details and an extensive discussion on the computation of differen- tial invariants for both finite-dimensional Lie symmetry groups and for infinite-dimensional Lie (pseudo)groups using moving frames. The further organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2 we compute the equivalence group and the equivalence algebra of the class (1). Section 3 is devoted to the selection of a group to be consid- ered and a preliminary analysis of equivariant moving frames associated with this group. The structure of the algebra of differential invariants is determined in the main Section 4. This includes a description of a minimum generating set of differential invariants and a complete set of independent operators of invariant differentiation, which serve to ex- haustively describe the set of differential invariants. Moreover, for each k ∈ N0 we explicitly present a functional basis of differential invariants of order not greater than k. 2. The equivalence group. The auxiliary system for the class (1), which is satisfied by the arbitrary element f , is ft = fx = fut = futt = futx = fuxx = 0. By definition [27, 28, 29, 31], the (usual) equiva- lence group G∼ of the class (1) consists of the point transformations in the space with coordinates (t, x, u, ut, ux, utt, utx, uxx, f) that have the following properties: Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations 53 • they are projectable to the space with the coordinates (t, x, u), • their components for derivatives of u are found by prolongation using the chain rule, and • they map every equation from the class (1) to an equation from the same class. To begin finding the group G∼, we fix an arbitrary equation of the class (1), ut = uxx + f(u, ux), and aim to find point transformations in the space with coordinates (t, x, u), t̃ = T (t, x, u), x̃ = X(t, x, u), ũ = U(t, x, u), (2) that transform the fixed equation to an equation of the same class, ũt̃ = ũx̃x̃ + f̃(ũ, ũx̃). (3) A preliminary simplification is obtained from noting that the class (1) is a subclass of the class of second-order (1+1)-dimensional semi-linear evolution equations. Any point transformation between two equations from the latter class satisfies the constraints Tx = Tu = Xu = 0, i.e., t̃ = T (t), x̃ = X(t, x), and TtXxUu 6= 0. See [16, 18, 21] for further details. After taking into account the above constraints, the required transformed derivatives read ũt̃ = 1 Tt ( DtU − Xt Xx DxU ) , ũx̃ = 1 Xx DxU, ũx̃x̃ = ( 1 Xx Dx )2 U, where Dt and Dx are the usual total derivative operators with respect to t and x, respectively. Substituting these expressions and ut = uxx+f into Eq. (3), we split the resulting equation with respect to uxx yielding Tt = X 2 x . The remaining equation is f = Tt Uu f̃ − Ut + Xt Xx (Ux + Uuux) + Uxx + 2Uxuux + Uuuu 2 x. (4) The differential consequences of Eq. (4) that are obtained by separate differentiations with respect to t and x can be split with respect to derivatives of f̃ since they are regarded as independent for equivalence transformations. This yields the equations Ttt = Xxt = Xtt = Ut = Ux = 0. 54 E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, A. Bihlo, R.O. Popovych The equation (4) itself gives the f -component of equivalence transfor- mations. The arbitrary element f in fact depends only on u and ux. The space with coordinates (t, x, u, ux, f) is preserved by all elements of G∼. This is why we can assume this space as the underlying space for G∼ and present merely the transformation components for its coordinates. As a result, we have proved the following theorem. Theorem 1. The equivalence group G∼ of the class (1) is constituted by the transformations t̃ = C2 1 t+ C0, x̃ = C1x+ C1C2t+ C3, ũ = ϕ(u), ũx̃ = C−1 1 ϕ′ux, f̃ = C−2 1 ( ϕ′f − C2ϕ ′ux − ϕ′′u2 x ) , (5) where C0, C1, C2, C3 ∈ R, ϕ is an arbitrary smooth function of u and C1ϕ ′ 6= 0. The infinitesimal generators of one-parameter subgroups of G∼, which constitute the equivalence algebra g∼ of the class (1), can be derived from (5) by differentiation, cf. the proof of Corollary 11 in [20] or the proof of Corollary 6 in [4]. These generators coincide with those de- termined in [32]. As we will later need them for the description of the algebra of differential invariants of a group related to G∼ in the context of the G∼-equivalence among equations of the class (1), we present them here. The general element of g∼ is Q = τ∂t + ξ∂x + φ∂u + η∂ux + θ∂f , where the components are of the form τ = 2c1t+ c0, ξ = c1x+ c2t+ c3, φ = φ(u), η = (φ′ − c1)ux, θ = (φ′ − 2c1)f − c2ux − φ′′u2 x, in which c0, c1, c2 and c3 are arbitrary real constants, and φ is an arbi- trary smooth function of u. In other words, the equivalence algebra g∼ of the class (1) is spanned by the vector fields ∂t, 2t∂t + x∂x − ux∂ux − 2f∂f , t∂x − ux∂f , φ∂u + φ′ux∂ux + (φ′f − φ′′u2 x)∂f , where φ runs through the set of smooth functions of u. Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations 55 3. Preliminary analysis of moving frames. Let us first clar- ify the space of independent and dependent variables to be used and the group to be considered. While formally the arbitrary element f is a smooth function on the second-order jet space with coordinates (t, x, u, ut, ux, utt, utx, uxx), practically it explicitly depends only on u and ux. This is why subsequently we will only consider the projection of the equivalence transformations to the space with coordinates (u, ux, f). As a shorthand, we denote v := ux and ṽ := ũx̃ = V (u, v) := C−1 1 ϕ′(u)v. In other words, we will in fact study differential invariants of the pro- jection G1 of G∼ to the space with coordinates (u, v, f), where u and v are the independent variables and f is the dependent variable. The in- finitesimal counterpart of G1 is the projection g1 of g∼ to the space with coordinates (u, v, f). In order to describe the algebra of differential invariants of the group G1, we now construct a moving frame for this group. Since it is infinite- dimensional, we have to use the machinery developed for Lie pseudo- groups, see [6, 25] for an extensive description of this subject. The first step in the construction of the moving frame is the com- putation of the lifted horizontal coframe, the dual of which yields the implicit total differentiation operators Dũ and Dṽ. For the equivalence transformations (5), the lifted horizontal coframe is dhũ = (DuU) du+ (DvU) dv = ϕ′ du, dhṽ = (DuV ) du+ (DvV ) dv = ϕ′′ C1 v du+ ϕ′ C1 dv. Computing the dual, we derive that Dũ = 1 ϕ′ Du − ϕ′′ (ϕ′)2 vDv, Dṽ = C1 ϕ′ Dv (6) are the required implicit differentiation operators. Acting with them on the transformation component for f , we find that f̃ij = ∂i+j f̃ ∂ũi∂ṽj = D i ũD j ṽ F, where i, j ∈ N0 := N ∪ {0} and f̃00 = f̃ = F := 1 C2 1 (ϕ′f − C2ϕ ′v − ϕ′′v2) 56 E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, A. Bihlo, R.O. Popovych is the f -component of equivalence transformations. In particular, the derivatives up to order 2 are exhausted by f̃10 = 1 C2 1ϕ ′ ( ϕ′fu + ϕ′′(f − vfv)− ϕ′′′v2 + 2 (ϕ′′)2 ϕ′ v2 ) , f̃01 = 1 C1ϕ′ (ϕ′fv − C2ϕ ′ − 2ϕ′′v) , f̃20 = 1 C2 1ϕ ′ ( fuu − ϕ′′ ϕ′ (fu−2vfuv) + ( ϕ′′ ϕ′ )2 v2fvv + ( ϕ′′ ϕ′ )′ (f−vfv)− (ϕ′)2 ( 1 ϕ′ ( 1 ϕ′ )′′)′ v2 ) , f̃11 = 1 C1ϕ′2 ( ϕ′fuv − ϕ′′vfvv − 2ϕ′′′v + 4 ϕ′′2 ϕ′ v ) , f̃02 = 1 ϕ′2 (ϕ′fvv − 2ϕ′′). There are a relative invariant and a relative conditional invariant which play a significant role in the following consideration. By taking the difference f̃00 − ṽf̃01 we exclude the inessential constant C2, which only arises in f̃00 and f̃01, f̃00 − ṽf̃01 = 1 C2 1 ( ϕ′(f − vfv) + ϕ′′v2 ) . Combining further 2(f̃00 − ṽf̃01) + ṽ2f̃02 to exclude ϕ′′, we obtain W̃ = 1 C2 1 W, where W = 2f − 2vfv + v2fvv, W̃ = 2f̃ − 2ṽf̃ṽ + ṽ2f̃ṽṽ, i.e., W is a relative invariant of G1. In other words, the condition W = 0 is preserved by any equivalence transformation in the class (1). Analo- gously, the combination 2f̃10 − vf̃11 gives S̃ = 1 C2 1 S + 1 C2 1 ϕ′′ ϕ′ W, where S = 2fu − vfuv, S̃ = 2f̃ũ − ṽf̃ũṽ. (7) This means that S is a relative invariant of G1 if the condition W = 0 is satisfied. Values of the differential functions W and S determine which normalization conditions should be chosen. Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations 57 We next find appropriate normalization conditions, which form the basis for the construction of an equivariant moving frame. As ϕ arises only in U , we can set U to any value including zero. The value of V can be set to any constant excluding zero, and all these possibilities are equivalent. We find it convenient to put V = 1 and express ϕ′ = C1/v. The constraint W = 0 singles out the singular case for the moving frame construction, which has to be investigated separately. Within this singular case, there is the ultra-singular subcase associated with the constraint S = 0. Indeed, under the constraint W = 0 the equation (7) can be solved for C1 if and only if S 6= 0. 4. Differential invariants for the regular case. In this paper, we only consider the regular case for moving frames of G1, where W 6= 0. In this case, the following normalization conditions can be used to de- termine a complete moving frame ũ = 0, ṽ = 1, f̃ = 1, f̃01 = 0, f̃02 = 0, f̃i0 = −v 2ϕ(i+2) C 2 1 (ϕ′)i + 1 C 2 1 i∑ i′=0 ( i i′ ) 1 (ϕ′)i′ ( ϕ′′ (ϕ′)2 )i−i′ fi′,i−i′ + · · · = 0, i ∈ N. (8) In the expression for f̃i0, we presented only the summands with the highest-order derivatives of ϕ and f , which are ϕ(i+2) and fi′,i−i′ , i ′ = 0, . . . , i, respectively. We solve the first five equations with respect to C1, C2, ϕ, ϕ′ and ϕ′′ and substitute the obtained expressions into the other equations. For each fixed i ∈ N, we solve the modified equation f̃i0 = 0 in view of the similar equations with lower values of i and thus find an expression for ϕ(i+2), the explicit form of which is essential for further consideration only for i = 3. This yields the following complete moving frame: C1 = W 2v , C2 = fv − vfvv, ϕ = 0, ϕ′ = W 2v2 , ϕ′′ = W 4v2 fvv, ϕ′′′ = W 4v4 ( 2fu + (f − vfv + v2fvv)fvv ) , ϕ(i+2) = W 2v1 i∑ i′=0 ( i i′ )( v2 W )i−i′ fi′,i−i′ + · · · , i = 2, 3, . . . . (9) 58 E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, A. Bihlo, R.O. Popovych In the expression for ϕ(i+2), we presented only the summands with the highest-order derivatives fi′,i−i′ , i ′ = 0, . . . , i. The invariantization Iij = ι(fij) of the derivatives fij of f̃ that are not involved in the normalization conditions (8) gives rise to a complete set of functionally independent differential invariants of G1. The lowest-order non-phantom normalized differential invariant is I11, and it reads I11 = −2v2 4fu − 2vfuv + (2f − 2vfv + v2fvv)fvv (2f − 2vfv + v2fvv)2 . This differential invariant is of second order. For each tuple (i, j) with i + j > 3 and j 6= 0, the maximal orders of derivatives of f and ϕ appearing in the expression for f̃ij are i+ j and i+ 2, respectively. This is why the maximal order of derivatives of f in the expression for f̃ij cannot be lowered in the course of the invariantization, i.e., the order of the normalized differential invariant Iij is i+ j. Therefore, there are precisely 1 2k(k+1)−2 functionally independent differential G1-invariants of order not greater than k > 2. They are given by the functions I11 and Iij with 3 6 i+ j 6 k and j 6= 0. Apart from finding the complete set of functionally independent dif- ferential invariants of G1 for each fixed order by successively invarianti- zing all the derivatives fij , the moving frame (9) can be used to deter- mine the operators of invariant differentiation. They are found upon invariantizing the operators of total differentiation (6) and read Di u = 2v2 2f − 2vfv + v2fvv ( Du − 1 2 vfvvDv ) , Di v = vDv. (10) We now aim to investigate the structure of the algebra of differential invariants of G1. The starting point for this investigation is the uni- versal recurrence relation, which relates the differentiated invariantized differential functions or differential forms with the invariantization of the respective differentiated objects. This universal recurrence relation reads [25] dι(Ω) = ι ( dΩ +Q(∞)(Ω) ) . (11) The first step in our study is the evaluation of (11) for the independent variables u and v and the derivatives fij , i, j ∈ N0, dhι(u) = ω1 + ι(φ), dhι(v) = ω2 + ι(η), Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations 59 dhI ij = dhι(fij) = ι(fi+1,jdu+ fi,j+1dv + θij) = Ii+1,jω1 + Ii,j+1ω2 + ι(θij), where ω1 = ι(du), ω2 = ι(dv), and θij = D i uD j v (θ − φf10 − ηf01) + φfi+1,j + ηfi,j+1 = (j − 2)c1fij − (j − 1) i∑ i′=0 ( i i′ ) φ(i′+1)fi−i′,j − i∑ i′=1 ( i i′ )( φ(i′)fi−i′+1,j + vφ(i′+1)fi−i′,j+1 ) − c2δ0i(δ0jv + δ1j)− φ(i+2)(δ0jv 2 + 2δ1jv + 2δ2j) is the fij-component of the infinite prolongation of the vector field φ∂u+ η∂v + θ∂f . Here δij is the Kronecker delta. The respective recurrence relations then split into two kinds, the first being the so-called phantom recurrence relations. For a well-defined moving frame cross-section, they can be uniquely solved for the invariantized Maurer–Cartan forms, which arise due to the presence of the correction term ι ( Q(∞)(Ω) ) in (11). Then, plugging these invariantized Maurer–Cartan forms into the second kind of recurrence relations, the non-phantom ones, gives a complete description of the relation between the normalized and differentiated differential invariants, see [6, 25] for more details. For the chosen cross- section (8), the phantom recurrence relations read 0 = dhι(u) = ω1 + ι(φ) = ω1 + φ̂, 0 = dhι(v) = ω2 + ι(η) = ω2 + φ̂′ − ĉ1, 0 = dhI 00 = ι(θ) = φ̂′ − 2ĉ1 − ĉ2 − φ̂′′, 0 = dhI 01 = I11ω1 + ι(θ01) = I11ω1 − ĉ2 − 2φ̂′′, 0 = dhI 02 = I12ω1 + I03ω2 + ι(θ02) = I12ω1 + I03ω2 − 2φ̂′′, 0 = dhI i0 = Ii1ω2 + ι(θi0) = Ii1ω2 + φ̂(i+1) − φ̂(i+2) − i−1∑ i′=1 ( i i′ ) Ii−i ′,1φ̂(i′+1), i ∈ N, where the forms ĉ1, ĉ2 and φ̂(i), i ∈ N0, are the invariantizations of the parameters c1, c2 and φ(i) of the infinitely prolonged general element of the algebra g1, respectively, ĉ1 = ι(c1), ĉ2 = ι(c2) and φ̂(i) = ι(φ(i)). 60 E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, A. Bihlo, R.O. Popovych More rigorously, here the parameters c1, c2 and φ(i), i ∈ N0, are in- terpreted as the coordinate functions on the infinite prolongation of g1. Recall that under the prolongation we consider u and v to be the indepen- dent variables and f to be the dependent variable. In other words, these coefficients are first-order differential forms in the jet space J∞(u, v| f). Hence their invariantizations are also forms, which are called invari- antized Maurer–Cartan forms. The above system can be solved to yield the following invariantized Maurer–Cartan forms ĉ1 = ( 1 2 I12 − I11 ) ω1 + ( 1 2 I03 − 1 ) ω2, ĉ2 = (I11 − I12)ω1 − I03ω2, φ̂ = −ω1, φ̂′ = ( 1 2 I12 − I11 ) ω1 + ( 1 2 I03 − 2 ) ω2, φ̂′′ = 1 2 I12ω1 + 1 2 I03ω2, φ̂(i+2) = φ̂(i+1) − i−1∑ i′=1 ( i i′ ) Ii−i ′,1φ̂(i′+1) + Ii1ω2, i ∈ N. (12) The explicit expression for the invariantized form φ̂(i+2), i ∈ N, as a combination of ω1 and ω2 with coefficients being polynomials of normal- ized differential invariants is obtained by expanding the above expression when successively going over the values of i. In particular, φ̂′′′ = 1 2 I12ω1 + ( I11 + 1 2 I03 ) ω2, φ̂(4) = ( 1 2 I12 − I11I12 ) ω1 + ( I11 + 1 2 I03 + I21 − I11I03 ) ω2. For i > 3, the greatest value of i′ + j′ for the normalized differential invariants Ii ′j′ that are involved in φ̂(i+2) is i+ 1, and Ii1ω2 is the only summand with this value. The non-phantom recurrence relations are dhI 11 = I21ω1 + I12ω2 + ι(θ11) = ( I21 + 2(I11)2 − I11I12 − I12 ) ω1 + ( I12 − I11I03 + I11 − I03 ) ω2, Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations 61 dhI ij = Ii+1,jω1 + Ii,j+1ω2 + ι(θij), i+ j > 3, j 6= 0, with ι(θij) = (j − 2)Iij ĉ1 − (j − 1) i∑ i′=0 ( i i′ ) Ii−i ′,j φ̂(i′+1) − i∑ i′=1 ( i i′ )( Ii−i ′+1,j φ̂(i′) + Ii−i ′,j+1φ̂(i′+1) ) − δ0i(δ0j + δ1j)ĉ2 − (δ0j + 2δ1j + 2δ2j)φ̂ (i+2). The first non-phantom recurrence relation splits into Di uI 11 = I21 + 2(I11)2 − I11I12 − I12, Di vI 11 = I12 − I11I03 + I11 − I03. Therefore, the normalized differential invariants I12 and I21 are ex- pressed in terms of invariant derivatives of I11 and I03, I12 = Di vI 11 + I11I03 − I11 + I03, I21 = Di uI 11 − 2(I11)2 + (I11 + 1)(Di vI 11 + I11I03 − I11 + I03). (13) In view of the above discussion on the invariantize forms φ̂(i′), i ∈ N, the expression for ι(θij) with i + j > 3 and j 6= 0 implies that the greatest value of i′ + j′ for Ii ′j′ involved in ι(θij) is i + j. Hence splitting the recurrence relation with dhI ij leads to expressions for Ii+1,j and Ii,j+1 in terms of invariant derivatives of Ii ′j′ with i′+ j′ 6 i+ j. For example, from the non-phantom recurrence relation dhI 03 = I13ω1 + I04ω2 + ι(θ03) = ( I13 + I11I03 − I12I03 2 ) ω1 + ( I04 + I03 − (I03)2 2 ) ω2 we derive Di uI 03 = I13 + I11I03 − 1 2 I12I03, Di vI 03 = I04 − 1 2 (I03)2 + I03. 62 E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, A. Bihlo, R.O. Popovych This implies by induction, where the expressions (13) for I12 and I21 give the base case, that any non-phantom normalized differential invariant can be expressed in terms of invariant derivatives of I11 and I03. To find a minimum generating set of differential invariants for the projected group G1, we should additionally check whether I03 can be expressed in terms of invariant derivatives of I11. We use (11) to compute the commutator between the operators of invariant differentiation. This is done upon evaluating (11) for the basis horizontal forms du and dv, dhι(du) = ι(φ′du) = ι(φ′) ∧ ι(du) = ( 2− 1 2 I03 ) ω1 ∧ ω2 = −Y 1 12 ω 1 ∧ ω2, dhι(dv) = ι ( φ′′vdu+ (φ′ − c1)dv ) = ι(φ′′v) ∧ ι(du) = −1 2 I03ω1 ∧ ω2 = −Y 2 12 ω 1 ∧ ω2. The commutation relation then evaluates as [Di u,D i v] = Y 1 12Di u + Y 2 12Di v = ( 1 2 I03 − 2 ) Di u + 1 2 I03Di v, see [25] for details of the technique applied. Evaluating [Di u,D i v]I 11, we can derive the following expression for I03: I03 := 2v3fvvv 2f − 2vfv + v2fvv = 2 2Di uI 11 + [Di u,D i v]I 11 Di uI 11 + Di vI 11 . As a result, we have proved the following theorem. Theorem 2. The algebra of differential invariants of the group G1, which is the projection of the equivalence group G∼ of the class of diffu- sion equations (1) to the space with coordinates (u, v, f), is generated by the single differential invariant I11 = −2v2 4fu − 2vfuv + (2f − 2vfv + v2fvv)fvv (2f − 2vfv + v2fvv)2 along with the two operators of invariant differentiation Di u = 2v2 2f − 2vfv + v2fvv ( Du − 1 2 vfvvDv ) , Di v = vDv. All other differential invariants are functions of I11 and invariant deriva- tives thereof. Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations 63 Corollary 1. A functional basis of differential invariants of order not greater than k ∈ N0 in terms of invariant derivatives of non-phantom normalized differential invariants is exhausted by( Di u )i( Di v )j I11, i+ j 6 k − 2, ( Di v )j′ I03, j′ 6 k − 3. Acknowledgements. This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs program, the NSERC Dis- covery Grant program and the InnovateNL LeverageR&D program. AB is a recipient of an APART Fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sci- ences. The research of ROP and EMDSCB was supported by the Aus- trian Science Fund (FWF), projects P25064 and P29177. [1] Bihlo A., Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo E., Popovych R.O., Invariant parameteri- zation of geostrophic eddies in the ocean, arXiv:1908.06345, 21 pp. [2] Bihlo A., Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo E.M., Popovych R.O., Invariant param- eterization and turbulence modeling on the beta-plane, Phys. D 269 (2014), 48–62, arXiv:1112.1917. [3] Bihlo A., Popovych R.O., Invariant discretization schemes for the shallow-water equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34 (2012), B810–B839, arXiv:1201.0498. [4] Bihlo A., Popovych R.O., Group classification of linear evolution equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 448 (2017), 982–1005, arXiv:1605.09251. [5] Bihlo A., Valiquette F., Symmetry-preserving numerical schemes, in Symmetries and Integrability of Difference Equations, CRM Ser. Math. Phys., Springer, Cham, 2017, 261–324. [6] Cheh J., Olver P.J., Pohjanpelto J., Algorithms for differential invariants of symmetry groups of differential equations, Found. Comput. Math. 8 (2008), 501–532. [7] Dorodnitsyn V., Applications of Lie groups to difference equations, Differential and Integral Equations and their Applications, Vol. 8, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2011. [8] Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo E.M., Differential invariants for the Korteweg–de Vries equation, in Proceedings of 6th International Workshop “Group Analysis of Differential Equations & Integrable Systems” (June 17–21, 2012, Protaras, Cyprus), University of Cyprus, Nicosia, 2013, 71–79. [9] Fels M., Olver P.J., Moving coframes: I. A practical algorithm, Acta Appl. Math. 51 (1998), 161–213. [10] Fels M., Olver P.J., Moving coframes. II. Regularization and theoretical foun- dations, Acta Appl. Math. 55 (1999), 127–208. [11] Gandarias M.L., Torrisi M., Tracina R., On some differential invariants for a family of diffusion equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 (2007), 8803–8813. 64 E. Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, A. Bihlo, R.O. Popovych [12] Ibragimov N.H., Invariants of hyperbolic equations: Solution of the Laplace problem, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 45 (2004), 158–166. [13] Ibragimov N.H., Meleshko S.V., Thailert E., Invariants of linear parabolic differ- ential equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 13 (2008), 277–284. [14] Ibragimov N.H., Sophocleous C., Differential invariants of the one-dimensional quasi-linear second-order evolution equation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 12 (2007), 1133–1145. [15] Ibragimov N.H., Torrisi M., Valenti A., Differential invariants of nonlinear equa- tions vtt = f(x, vx)vxx + g(x, vx), Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 9 (2004), 69–80. [16] Ivanova N.M., Popovych R.O., Sophocleous C., Group analysis of variable coefficient diffusion-convection equations. I. Enhanced group classification, Lobachevskii J. Math. 31 (2010), 100–122. [17] Johnpillai I.K., Mahomed F.M., Singular invariant equation for the (1+1) Fokker–Planck equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001), 11033–11051. [18] Kingston J.G., Sophocleous C., On form-preserving point transformations of partial differential equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31 (1998), 1597–1619. [19] Kumei S., Bluman G.W., When nonlinear differential equations are equivalent to linear differential equations, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 42 (1982), 1157–1173. [20] Kurujyibwami C., Basarab-Horwath P., Popovych R.O., Algebraic method for group classification of (1+1)-dimensional linear Schrödinger equations, Acta Appl. Math. 157 (2018), 171–203, arXiv:1607.04118. [21] Magadeev B.A., Group classification of nonlinear evolution equations, St. Pe- tersburg Math. J. 5 (1994), 345–359. [22] Olver P.J., Generating differential invariants, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 333 (2007), 450–471. [23] Olver P.J., Differential invariant algebra, Comtemp. Math. 549 (2011), 95–121. [24] Olver P.J., Modern developments in the theory, applications of moving frames, London Math. Soc. Impact150 Stories 1 (2015), 14–50. [25] Olver P.J., Pohjanpelto J., Moving frames for Lie pseudo-groups, Canadian J. Math. 60 (2008), 1336–1386. [26] Olver P.J., Pohjanpelto J., Differential invariant algebras of Lie pseudo-groups, Adv. Math. 222 (2009), 1746–1792. [27] Opanasenko S., Bihlo A., Popovych R.O., Group analysis of general Burgers– Korteweg–de Vries equations, J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017), 081511, 37 pp., arXiv:1703.06932. [28] Ovsiannikov L.V., Group analysis of differential equations, Acad. Press, New York, 1982. [29] Popovych R.O., Classification of admissible transformations of differential equa- tions, Collection of Works of Institute of Mathematics, Kyiv 3 (2006), no. 2, 239–254. [30] Popovych R.O., Bihlo A., Symmetry preserving parameterization schemes, J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012), 073102, 36 pp., arXiv:1010.3010. Di�erential invariants for a class of di�usion equations 65 [31] Popovych R.O., Kunzinger M., Eshraghi H., Admissible transformations and normalized classes of nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Acta Appl. Math. 109 (2010), 315–359, arXiv:math-ph/0611061. [32] Torrisi M., Tracina R., Second-order differential invariants of a family of diffu- sion equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005), 7519–7526. [33] Torrisi M., Tracina R., Valenti A., On the linearization of semilinear wave equa- tions, Nonlin. Dyn. 36 (2004), 97–106. [34] Tracina R., Invariants of a family of nonlinear wave equations, Commun. Non- linear Sci. Numer. Simul. 9 (2004), 127–133. [35] Tsaousi C., Sophocleous C., Tracina R., Invariants of two- and three-dimen- sional hyperbolic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 349 (2009), 516–525.
id oai:trim.imath.kiev.ua:article-367
institution Transactions of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-08-04T01:06:11Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv trimimathkievua/59/8eec58aaf57f706d721ae01332be6259.pdf
spelling oai:trim.imath.kiev.ua:article-3672020-08-13T08:52:53Z Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations Диференціальні інваріанти класу рівнянь дифузії Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, E. Bihlo, A. Popovych, R. Дос Сантос Кардозо-Біло, E. Біло, А. Попович, Р. We find the complete equivalence group of a class of (1+1)-dimensional second-order evolution equations, which is infinite-dimensional.The equivariant moving frame methodology is invoked to construct, in the regular case of the normalization procedure, a moving frame for a group related to the equivalence group in the context of equivalence transformations among equations of the class under consideration.Using the moving frame constructed, we describe the algebra of differential invariants of the former group by obtaining a minimum generating set of differential invariants and a complete set of independent operators of invariant differentiation. Знайдено повну групу еквівалентності класу (1+1)-вимірних еволюційних рівнянь другого порядку, яка виявилася нескінченновимірною.Методологію еквіваріантних рухомих реперів застосовано у регулярному випадку процедури нормалізації до побудови рухомого репера групи, пов'язаної з групою еквівалентності в контексті перетворень еквівалентності між рівняннями класу.За допомогою побудованого рухомого репера описано алгебру диференціальних інваріантів цієї групи через отримання мінімальної генеруючої множини диференціальних інваріантів і повної множини операторів інваріантного диференціювання. Інститут математики НАН України 2019-09-03 Article Article application/pdf https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/article/view/367 Transactions of Institute of Mathematics, the NAS of Ukraine; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2019): Symmetry and Integrability of Equations of Mathematical Physics; 50-65 Сборник Трудов Института математики НАН Украины; Том 16 № 1 (2019): Симетрія та інтегровність рівнянь математичної фізики; 50-65 Збірник Праць Інституту математики НАН України; Том 16 № 1 (2019): Симетрія та інтегровність рівнянь математичної фізики; 50-65 3083-7529 1815-2910 en https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/article/view/367/362 Авторське право (c) 2019 E. Дос Сантос Кардозо-Біло, А. Біло, Р. Попович
spellingShingle Dos Santos Cardoso-Bihlo, E.
Bihlo, A.
Popovych, R.
Дос Сантос Кардозо-Біло, E.
Біло, А.
Попович, Р.
Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations
title Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations
title_alt Диференціальні інваріанти класу рівнянь дифузії
title_full Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations
title_fullStr Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations
title_full_unstemmed Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations
title_short Differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations
title_sort differential invariants for a class of diffusion equations
url https://trim.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/trim/article/view/367
work_keys_str_mv AT dossantoscardosobihloe differentialinvariantsforaclassofdiffusionequations
AT bihloa differentialinvariantsforaclassofdiffusionequations
AT popovychr differentialinvariantsforaclassofdiffusionequations
AT dossantoskardozobíloe differentialinvariantsforaclassofdiffusionequations
AT bíloa differentialinvariantsforaclassofdiffusionequations
AT popovičr differentialinvariantsforaclassofdiffusionequations
AT dossantoscardosobihloe diferencíalʹníínvaríantiklasurívnânʹdifuzíí
AT bihloa diferencíalʹníínvaríantiklasurívnânʹdifuzíí
AT popovychr diferencíalʹníínvaríantiklasurívnânʹdifuzíí
AT dossantoskardozobíloe diferencíalʹníínvaríantiklasurívnânʹdifuzíí
AT bíloa diferencíalʹníínvaríantiklasurívnânʹdifuzíí
AT popovičr diferencíalʹníínvaríantiklasurívnânʹdifuzíí