Interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2013
1. Verfasser: O. R. Ivasyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2013
Schriftenreihe:State and law : Legal and Political Sciences
Online Zugang:http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0000307307
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Library portal of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine | LibNAS

Institution

Library portal of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine | LibNAS
_version_ 1859537372757098496
author O. R. Ivasyn
author_facet O. R. Ivasyn
author_sort O. R. Ivasyn
collection Open-Science
first_indexed 2025-07-22T09:36:15Z
format Article
id open-sciencenbuvgovua-82163
institution Library portal of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine | LibNAS
language English
last_indexed 2025-07-22T09:36:15Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
series State and law : Legal and Political Sciences
spelling open-sciencenbuvgovua-821632024-04-16T18:25:58Z Interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review O. R. Ivasyn 1563-3349 2013 en State and law : Legal and Political Sciences http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0000307307 Article
spellingShingle State and law : Legal and Political Sciences
O. R. Ivasyn
Interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review
title Interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review
title_full Interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review
title_fullStr Interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review
title_full_unstemmed Interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review
title_short Interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review
title_sort interlocutory judgment in administrative process as the way of judicial review
url http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0000307307
work_keys_str_mv AT orivasyn interlocutoryjudgmentinadministrativeprocessasthewayofjudicialreview