THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER SYSTEM FUNCTIONING
The rapid development of electric transportation in the world is due to significant economic and ecological advantages. The Ukrainian government also is planning to develop a national strategy and plans for the implementation of electric transportation. But the additional load poses challenges for U...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2023 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Англійська |
| Опубліковано: |
General Energy Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
2023
|
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://systemre.org/index.php/journal/article/view/11 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | System Research in Energy |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Репозитарії
System Research in Energy| _version_ | 1871102984485601280 |
|---|---|
| author | Nataliia Ivanenko |
| author_facet | Nataliia Ivanenko |
| author_institution_txt_mv | [
{
"author": "Nataliia Ivanenko",
"institution": null
}
] |
| author_sort | Nataliia Ivanenko |
| baseUrl_str | https://systemre.org/index.php/journal/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2026-07-18T12:57:29Z |
| description | The rapid development of electric transportation in the world is due to significant economic and ecological advantages. The Ukrainian government also is planning to develop a national strategy and plans for the implementation of electric transportation. But the additional load poses challenges for Ukraine’s Integrated Power System. The analysis of the influence of electric transportation introduction on Integrated Power System operation would facilitate its effective government implementation. The aim of this paper was to estimate the effect of implementation volumes of electric transportation on the Integrated Power System operation, fossil fuel consumption, greenhouse gases, and pollutant emissions. A set of calculations was carried out for electric transportation volumes from 30 to 420 thousand electric vehicles by step 30 thousand based on a program and information complex simulating the operation of Ukraine's Integrated Power System, which has been developed in the Institute of General Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine for the past few years. The calculations show that the share of nuclear power plants in Ukraine’s Integrated Power System increases according to the growth of the electric vehicles fleet. Therefore, it is expected to decrease fuel consumption as well as greenhouse gases and pollutants emissions. Fuel intensity is reduced by approximately 5% for electric transportation volume of 150 thousand and approximately 8% for 300 thousand. Specific emissions decrease faster due to the ratio of coal and gas power plants. Fuel intensity considerably varies from 0.07 (Summer) to 0.15 (Winter) tce/kWh. In general, the additional load from the implementation of electric transportation positively affects the energy system of Ukraine, increasing the efficiency of its operation by reducing specific fuel consumption. It should be noted that such trends are observed exclusively for Ukraine due to the specific structure of Ukraine's Integrated Power System with the large share of nuclear energy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.15407/srenergy2023.01.004 |
| first_indexed | 2026-03-24T02:00:38Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
System Research in Energy. 2023. 1(72) 4
ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ ЕНЕРГЕТИКИ,
ЕНЕРГЕТИЧНІ СИСТЕМИ І КОМПЛЕКСИ
______________________________________________________________________
ISSN 2786-7102 (Online), ISSN 2786-7633 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.15407/srenergy2023.01.004
UDC 621.3;519.8
Nataliia Ivanenko, PhD (Engin.), https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-1556
General Energy Institute of NAS of Ukraine, 172, Antonovycha St., Kyiv, 03150, Ukraine;
e-mail: ivan_na@i.ua
________________________________________________________________________________
THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC
TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER
SYSTEM FUNCTIONING
Abstract. The rapid development of electric transportation in the world is due to significant economic
and ecological advantages. The Ukrainian government also is planning to develop a national strategy
and plans for the implementation of electric transportation. But the additional load poses challenges for
Ukraine’s Integrated Power System. The analysis of the influence of electric transportation introduction
on Integrated Power System operation would facilitate its effective government implementation. The aim
of this paper was to estimate the effect of implementation volumes of electric transportation on
the Integrated Power System operation, fossil fuel consumption, greenhouse gases, and pollutant
emissions. A set of calculations was carried out for electric transportation volumes from 30 to 420
thousand electric vehicles by step 30 thousand based on a program and information complex simulating
the operation of Ukraine's Integrated Power System, which has been developed in the Institute of General
Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine for the past few years. The calculations show that
the share of nuclear power plants in Ukraine’s Integrated Power System increases according to the
growth of the electric vehicles fleet. Therefore, it is expected to decrease fuel consumption as well as
greenhouse gases and pollutants emissions. Fuel intensity is reduced by approximately 5% for electric
transportation volume of 150 thousand and approximately 8% for 300 thousand. Specific emissions
decrease faster due to the ratio of coal and gas power plants. Fuel intensity considerably varies from
0.07 (Summer) to 0.15 (Winter) tce/kWh. In general, the additional load from the implementation of
electric transportation positively affects the energy system of Ukraine, increasing the efficiency of its
operation by reducing specific fuel consumption. It should be noted that such trends are observed
exclusively for Ukraine due to the specific structure of Ukraine's Integrated Power System with the large
share of nuclear energy.
Keywords: electric transportation, Ukraine’s Integrated Power System, greenhouse gas emissions,
pollutant emissions.
1. Introduction
Nowadays humanity is seriously concerned about the problem of global warming and local
environmental pollution. Transportation is one of the economic sectors that is facing serious challenges due
to environmental concerns. These concerns include the combustion of fossil fuels, global warming, and local
pollution. Implementation of battery-powered electric vehicles (EVs) could be an effective solution
to mitigate environmental issues and reduce fossil fuel consumption.
The fleet of electric transportation rapidly increases worldwide [1, 2]. The number of electric vehicles
per 1,000 residents in the EU significantly varies. For example, in 2020 this indicator totals 6.5 in France,
8.5 in Germany, 20.6 in Sweden and 81 in Norway. Ukraine is significantly behind in the number of electric
cars (approximately 0.75 numbers of electric vehicles per 1,000 residents). Now the Ukrainian government
is planning to develop a national strategy and programs for electric transportation implementation.
The common practice is to compare emissions from EVs with petrol cars using average consumption
of electricity/fuel per 1 km and specific emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and pollutants from
electricity/fuel [3–6]. Similar approach is used for evaluating economic efficiency of electric vehicles
System Research in Energy. 2023. 1(72) 5
exploitation. This approach is not comprehensive. We should take into account that EVs charging
is an additional load on energy system operation. Therefore electric transportation causes changes in energy
system functioning and consequently changes in the emission level.
Although EVs present several environmental advantages, a massive introduction of them could create
several issues in the power grid, which has been studied by several researchers [7]. For example, in [8],
the impact of different penetration levels of plug-in electric vehicles in a distribution system was considered,
and it was demonstrated that a significant EVs load leads to voltage drop and voltage deviations. In [9],
it was demonstrated that charging EVs considerably increases the distribution load and, so, the total power
losses. Furthermore, EVs charging increases the daily peak load. The authors of [10] indicated that EVs
generate substantial investment costs in distribution systems, and that power losses can reach up to 40%
for EVs penetration of 62%. In [11], it was exposed that EVs fast charging leads to harmonic issues and
failure to respect IEEE standard limits. In [12], it was proposed that the life durations of low-voltage
transformers are reduced with a high penetration of EVs.
Although EVs presents several environmental advantages a massive introduction of them could create
several issues in the power grid, which has been studied by several researchers [13] for the massive
introduction of EVs into power systems. For example, smart charging of EVs is an important area of study,
which allows EVs users and grid operators to properly manage EVs charging profiles in order to obtain
technical and economic benefits, as well as considering the specific demand-side management of EVs [14].
Some other researchers have focused on the management of EVs charging stations. In particular,
it is crucial to locate the optimal placement of EVs charging stations to meet technical grid constraints,
considering customer wait times [15].
Therefore the fundamental study of the influence of electric transportation implementation
on Ukraine's Integrated Power System (IPS) is needed for developing strategies of EVs fleet increase.
The experience of other countries is not applicable for Ukrainian circumstances. Ukraine's IPS is a unique
complex system with different energy sources, partly obsolete equipment etc.
The main factors to consider are the volume of EVs and EVs charging modes. The specific feature
of electric transportation is the opportunity to vary the charging load during the day due to implementing
different regulatory and/or incentive measures. The influence of EVs charging modes were analyzed in [16].
The aim of the paper is to estimate the effect of implementation volumes of electric transportation
on the IPS operation, fossil fuel consumption, GHG and pollutant emissions.
The study was carried out for the pre-war state of the IPS. Now the IPS has suffered huge damage due
to the war with the Russian Federation. Nevertheless, the IPS will definitely be restored and updated
in the post-war period. It should be expected nuclear and hydropower will recover to the same extent. TPPs
are likely to be equipped with new generating equipment and exhaust gas purification systems. At the same
time, the IPS operation characteristics, specific fuel consumption and emission factors will change. In such
cases it is necessary to re-calculate relevant values.
2. Methodology
The author uses a program and information complex simulating the operation of Ukraine's Integrated
Power System developed in the General Energy Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [17].
This complex is based on a non-linear mixed integer least-cost dispatch model. It contains information
of all power units in the Ukraine’s IPS mentioned below.
Nuclear energy provides a reliable base load and covers more than half of the electricity production
in Ukraine (55.5 in 2021). There are four nuclear power plants (NPPs) in Ukraine with a total installed
capacity of 13835 megawatt (MW) (15 reactors in total, including 13 reactors with a capacity of 1000 MW
and two reactors with a capacity of 415 MW and 420 MW, respectively) [18].
At the beginning of 2022, there were 12 thermal power plants (TPPs) in Ukraine with a total installed
power capacity of 21.5 gigawatt. Most TPPs are using coal as a primary fuel. In 2021, the TPPs' share
in electricity production was 23.8% [19].
At the beginning of 2022, the total installed power capacity of combined heat and power plants
(CHPs) was 6.1 GW. Most CHPs are using natural gas as a primary fuel. In 2021 the share of CHPs and
cogeneration units in electricity production was 5.5%.
System Research in Energy. 2023. 1(72) 6
At the beginning of 2022, there were ten large hydropower plants (HPPs) with a total installed power
capacity of about 4.7 GW (101 units in total) and three pumped storage plants (PSPs) with an installed
capacity of 1.5 GW (11 units ranging from 33 MW to 324 MW per unit). Hydropower plays a crucial role
in the functioning of the Ukrainian power system, as HPPs and PSPs are the main providers of auxiliary
services to meet the peak demand of the power system and balance Renewable Energy [20]. PSPs also
contribute to flattening the night "gaps" of electricity consumption. In 2021, the share of HPPs and PSPs
in electricity production was 5.8% and 0.8%, respectively.
The photovoltaic (PV) sector had the highest growth rate among other renewable energy
sources (RES) in Ukraine during 2019–2021. At the beginning of 2022, the total installed PV capacity
reached 7.6 GW or 80% of the total RES installed capacity in Ukraine (including 45,000 prosumer
installations with a total capacity of 1.2 GW) [21].
At the beginning of 2022, Ukraine’s total installed capacity of wind power plants (all onshore) was
1.6 GW. Almost all wind power plants in Ukraine were built in the southern regions near the Azov and Black
seas coasts (Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions), where natural conditions for wind power plants are the most
favorable.
A set of calculations was carried out for electric transportation volumes from 30 to 420 thousands
by step 30 thousands.
3. Results
Fig. 1 shows the Structure of Ukraine’s IPS for the different volumes of electric transportation.
The share of nuclear power plants increases according to the growth of EVs fleet. This dependence is not
linear because NPP units can only operate at full capacity. The shares of coal and gas TPPs and CHPs are not
monotonic, but fluctuate over the entire range. Therefore it is expected to decrease fuel consumption as well
as GHG and pollutants emissions.
Fig. 1. Structure of Ukraine’s IPS for the different volumes of electric transportation
108825
110124
111443
112298
113035
114269
115125
116029
116847
117299
118668
119353
120177
120820
40416
39581
39034
38962
39078
38500
38182
38038
37985
38306
37599
37612
37415
37465
4653
4786
4675
4577
4475
4433
4519
4439
4347
4239
4247
4154
4202
4141
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
MWh
thous. EV
Nuclear Power Plants Coal Thermal Power Plants Gas Thermal Power Plants
System Research in Energy. 2023. 1(72) 7
Fig. 2 illustrates this fact. Fuel intensity is reduced by approximately 5% for EVs volume 150
thousands and approximately 8% for EVs volume 300 thousands. Specific emissions decrease faster due to
the ratio of coal and gas power plants.
Fig. 2. Dependence of fuel intensity and specific CO2 emissions on the volumes of electric transportation
Table 1 includes more detailed information about fuel consumption, GHG and pollutants emissions for
the different volumes of electric transportation. Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 show the detailed structure of IPS
(including renewable energy resources) for the EVs volumes 150 and 300 thousands correspondingly.
Table 1. Fuel combustion, fuel intensity, GHG and pollutants emissions for the different volumes of electric
transportation
Volume
of EVs,
thous.
Electricity
produced,
MWh
Fuel
combusted,
thous. tce
Fuel
intensity,
tce/kWh
CO2
Emissions,
Gg
Specific CO2
Emissions,
Gg/kWh
SO2
Emissions,
Gg
NОx
Emissions,
Gg
Dust,
Gg
30 190881 22231.9 0.116 55437.3 0.290 148.60 33.73 7.80
60 191558 21932.3 0.114 54556.1 0.285 145.60 33.33 7.64
90 192234 21681.4 0.113 53893.8 0.280 143.67 32.96 7.54
120 192910 21619.6 0.112 53753.1 0.279 143.36 33.00 7.52
150 193587 21629.5 0.112 53822.9 0.278 143.77 33.04 7.54
180 194263 21399.3 0.110 53184.7 0.274 141.76 32.61 7.43
210 194940 21294.6 0.109 52866.5 0.271 140.64 32.42 7.37
240 195616 21209.6 0.108 52655.8 0.269 140.09 32.40 7.35
270 196292 21159.8 0.108 52546.3 0.268 139.87 32.42 7.33
300 196969 21257.1 0.108 52850.9 0.268 140.98 32.66 7.39
330 197645 20975.7 0.106 52066.4 0.263 138.50 32.17 7.26
360 198322 20949.2 0.106 52022.7 0.262 138.49 32.27 7.26
390 198998 20881.9 0.105 51820.9 0.260 137.79 32.17 7.22
420 199674 20886.1 0.105 51851.7 0.260 137.97 32.17 7.23
The Table 2 and Table 3 illustrate the behavior of fuel intensity and emissions throughout the year for
the EVs volumes 150 and 300 thousands correspondingly. Fuel intensity considerably varies from 0.07
(Summer) to 0.15 (Winter) tce/kWh. The larger share of NPPs (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4) explains this trend. The
minimal values are observed in Summer when the share of electric transportation additional load is bigger
than in Winter.
In general, the additional load from the implementation of electric transportation positively affects
the energy system of Ukraine, increasing the efficiency of its operation by reducing specific fuel
consumption. It should be noted that such trends are observed exclusively for Ukraine due to the specific
structure of Ukraine's IPS with the large share of nuclear energy.
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 thous. EVs
Fuel intensity Specific CO2 Emissions
%
System Research in Energy. 2023. 1(72) 8
Fig. 3. Detailed structure of Ukraine’s IPS for the electric transportation 150 thousand EVs
Fig. 4. Detailed structure of Ukraine’s IPS for the electric transportation 300 thousand EVs
Table 2. The behavior of fuel intensity and carbon dioxide emissions throughout the year for the electric transportation
150 thousand EVs
Month Electricity
produced
Fuel
combusted
Fuel
intensity
CO2
Emissions
Specific
CO2
Emissions
SO2
Emissions
NОx
Emissions Dust
Units MWh thous. tce tce/kWh Gg t/kWh Gg Gg Gg
Jan 19689 2559.3 0.13 6361 0.32 16.98 4.21 0.89
Feb 17089 2033.8 0.12 4966 0.29 12.85 3.23 0.67
Mar 17514 1569.7 0.09 3650.9 0.21 8.6 2.39 0.44
Apr 15475 1149.6 0.07 2764 0.18 6.94 1.7 0.36
May 14648 1097.2 0.07 2677.7 0.18 6.91 1.66 0.36
Jun 14632 1371.4 0.09 3464.9 0.24 9.48 2.08 0.5
Jul 14699 1087.1 0.07 2731.2 0.19 7.41 1.64 0.39
Aug 14636 1314.4 0.09 3362.2 0.23 9.39 1.98 0.5
Sep 14325 1862.1 0.13 4847.1 0.34 13.91 2.77 0.74
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
EVs - 150 thous.
Nuclear Power Plants Coal Thermal Power Plants Gas Thermal Power Plants
Combined Heat and Power Stations Hydro Power Stations Wind Power Stations
Solar Power Stations
MWh
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
EVs - 300 thous.
Nuclear Power Plants Coal Thermal Power Plants Gas Thermal Power Plants
Combined Heat and Power Stations Hydro Power Stations Wind Power Stations
Solar Power Stations
MWh
System Research in Energy. 2023. 1(72) 9
Continuation of Table 2.
Month Electricity
produced
Fuel
combusted
Fuel
intensity
CO2
Emissions
Specific
CO2
Emissions
SO2
Emissions
NОx
Emissions Dust
Oct 15819 2323.8 0.15 5984.2 0.38 16.9 3.5 0.89
Nov 16927 2502.7 0.15 6215.7 0.37 16.54 3.77 0.87
Dec 18133 2758.3 0.15 6797.9 0.37 17.86 4.12 0.94
Table 3. The behavior of fuel intensity and carbon dioxide emissions throughout the year for the electric transportation
300 thous. EVs
Month Electricity
produced
Fuel
combusted
Fuel
intensity
CO2
Emissions
Specific
CO2
Emissions
SO2
Emissions
NОx
Emissions Dust
Units MWh thous. tce tce/kWh Gg t/kWh Gg Gg Gg
Jan 19976.59 2666.99 0.13 6680.44 0.33 18.08 4.47 0.95
Feb 17347.97 2092.01 0.12 5144.45 0.30 13.48 3.41 0.70
Mar 17801.05 1631.29 0.09 3828.86 0.22 9.20 2.51 0.48
Apr 15753.15 1166.19 0.07 2807.86 0.18 7.07 1.75 0.37
May 14935.48 1083.40 0.07 2649.02 0.18 6.86 1.64 0.36
Jun 14909.92 1470.66 0.10 3743.35 0.25 10.37 2.24 0.55
Jul 14986.72 1029.92 0.07 2567.61 0.17 6.87 1.56 0.36
Aug 14923.47 1277.13 0.09 3267.70 0.22 9.13 1.91 0.48
Sep 14603.13 1645.90 0.11 4233.51 0.29 11.92 2.40 0.63
Oct 16106.37 2133.35 0.13 5454.39 0.34 15.22 3.17 0.80
Nov 17204.80 2407.21 0.14 5958.66 0.35 15.77 3.64 0.83
Dec 18420.15 2653.03 0.14 6515.03 0.35 17.01 3.96 0.89
4. Conclusions
The rapid development of electric transportation in the world is due to significant economic and
ecological advantages. The Ukrainian government also is planning to develop a national strategy and plans
for the implementation of electric transportation. But the additional load poses challenges for Ukraine’s
Integrated Power System. The analysis of the influence of electric transportation introduction on IPS
operation would facilitate its effective implementation in Ukraine.
This paper analyzed the influence of electric transportation volumes on fuel consumed by IPS, fuel
intensity and emissions levels.
A set of calculations was carried out for electric transportation volumes from 30 to 420 thousands
by step 30 thousands based on a program and information complex simulating the operation of Ukraine's
Integrated Power System, which has been developing in the General Energy Institute of National Academy
of Sciences of Ukraine.
The calculations show that the share of nuclear power plants in the Ukraine’s IPS increases according
to the growth of EVs fleet. Therefore, it is expected to decrease fuel consumption as well as GHG and
pollutants emissions. Fuel intensity is reduced by approximately 5% for EVs volume 150 thousands and
approximately 8% for EVs volume 300 thousands. Specific emissions decrease faster due to the ratio of coal
and gas power plants. Fuel intensity considerably varies from 0.07 (Summer) to 0.15 (Winter) tce/kWh.
In general, the additional load from the implementation of electric transportation positively affects
the energy system of Ukraine, increasing the efficiency of its operation by reducing specific fuel
consumption. It should be noted that such trends are observed exclusively for Ukraine due to the specific
structure of Ukraine's IPS with the large share of nuclear energy.
System Research in Energy. 2023. 1(72) 10
References
1. Vehicles in use. (2023). European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association. URL:
https://www.acea.auto/files/ACEA-report-vehicles-in-use-europe-2023.pdf (last accessed: 25.01.2023).
2. Matteo, M., Marcus, A., Dougm, A., Morgan, B., Pierpaolo, C., Ercan, M., Farrell, J., Gearhart, C., Greene, D., &
Jenn, A. (2021). The rise of electric vehicles–2020 status and future expectations. Progress in Energy, 3(2),
022002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/abe0ad
3. Bieker, G. (2021). ICCT White Paper. Global Comparison of the Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions
of Passenger Cars. Berlin: International Council on Clean Transportation Europe, 86 p. URL: https://theicct.org/
wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Global-Vehicle-LCA-White-Paper-A4-revised-v2.pdf (last accessed: 25.01.2023).
4. Ivanenko, N.P. (2022). Overview of trends and prospects of electric transport development in the eu and
assessment of economic / «climate» efficiency of electromob operation. System Research in Energy, 2(71), 13–21
[in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/srenergy2022.02.013
5. Moomaw, W., Burgherr, P., Heath, G., Lenzen, M., Nyboer, G., & Verbruggen, A. (2021). Annex II.
Methodology. In IPCC Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge
University Press, 973–1000.
6. Morita, T., Robinson, J., Adegbulugbe, A. Alcamo, J., Herbert, D., Lebre la Rovere, E., Nakicenivic, N.,
Pitcher, H., Raskin, P., Riahi, K., & Sankovski, A. (2001). Greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios and
implications. In: Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment
Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, 115–166.
7. Clairand, J.M., Guerra-Terán, P., Serrano-Guerrero, X., González-Rodríguez, M., & Escrivá-Escrivá, G. (2019).
Electric Vehicles for Public Transportation in Power Systems: A Review of Methodologies. Energies, 12(16),
3114. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163114
8. Clement-Nyns, K., Haesen, E., & Driesen, J. (2010). The impact of Charging plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
on a residential distribution grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1(25), 371–380.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036481
9. Shafiee, S., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., & Rastegar, M. (2013). Investigating the impacts of plug-in hybrid electric
vehicles on power distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 4, 1351–1360.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036481
10. Pieltain, L., Gómez, T., Cossent, R., Mateo, C., & Frías, P. (2011). Assessment of the impact of plug-in electric
vehicles on distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1(26), 206–213.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2049133
11. Lucas, A., Bonavitacola, F., Kotsakis, E., & Fulli, G. (2015). Grid harmonic impact of multiple electric vehicle
fast charging. Electric Power Systems Research, 127, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.05.012
12. Guille, C., & Gross, G. (2009). A conceptual framework for the vehicle-to-grid (V2G) implementation. Energy
Policy, 11(37), 4379–4390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.053
13. Turker, H., Bacha, S., Chatroux, D., & Hably, A. (2012). Low-voltage transformer loss-of-life assessments
for a high penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 3(27),
1323–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.05310.1109/TPWRD.2012.2193423
14. Oda, T., Aziz, M., Mitani, T., Watanabe, Y., & Kashiwagi, T. (2018). Mitigation of congestion related to quick
charging of electric vehicles based on waiting time and cost–benefit analyses: A japanese case study. Sustainable
Cities and Society, 36, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.024
15. Arkin, E.M., Carmi, P., Katz, M.J., Mitchell, J.S., & Segal, M. (2019). Locating battery charging stations
to facilitate almost shortest paths. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 254, 10–16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2018.07.019
16. Ivanenko, N.P. (2022). Integration of Electric Transportation into Integrated Energy System of Ukraine. Electronic
modeling, 6(44), 102–111 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/emodel.44.06
17. Shulzhenko, S.V. (2021). Thermal Power Plant Fuel Consumption Accounting using “Negative” Member Method
in Linear Programming Model for Optimal Generation Dispatch. The Problems of General Energy, 3(66), 4–13
[in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2021.03.004
18. Shulzhenko, S.V., Turutikov, O.I., & Bilenko, M.O. (2020). Mixed integer linear programming dispatch model
for power system of Ukraine with large share of baseload nuclear and variable renewables. IEEE 7th International
Conference on Energy Smart Systems (ESS), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESS50319.2020.9160222
19. Shulzhenko, S.V., Turutikov, O.I., & Ivanenko, N.P. (2020). Mixed-integer linear programming mathematical
model for founding the optimal dispatch plan of Ukrainian thermal power plants’ units and hydro pumping
storages stations’ units for balancing daily load profile of power system of Ukraine. The Problems of General
Energy, 1(60),14–23 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2020.01.014
20. Shulzhenko, S., Turutikov, O., & Tarasenko, P. (2019). Model of Mathematical programming with integer
variables for determining the optimal regime of loading of hydroelectric pumped storage power plants for
balancing daily profile of electric loads of the power system of Ukraine. The Problems of General Energy, 4(59),
13–23 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2019.04.013
https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/abe0ad
https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Global-Vehicle-LCA-White-Paper-A4-revised-v2.pdf
https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Global-Vehicle-LCA-White-Paper-A4-revised-v2.pdf
http://srenergy.org.ua/index.php?option=com_docman&task=art_details&mid=20222&gid=645&lang=en
http://srenergy.org.ua/index.php?option=com_docman&task=art_details&mid=20222&gid=645&lang=en
https://doi.org/10.15407/srenergy2022.02.013
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2049133
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/electric-power-systems-research
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.05.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.053
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=61
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.053
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.053
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/sustainable-cities-and-society
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/sustainable-cities-and-society
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.024
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/discrete-applied-mathematics
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2018.07.019
https://www.emodel.org.ua/en/archive/2022/44-6/44-6-7
https://doi.org/10.15407/emodel.44.06
http://pge.org.ua/index.php?option=com_docman&task=art_details&mid=20213&gid=609&lang=en
http://pge.org.ua/index.php?option=com_docman&task=art_details&mid=20213&gid=609&lang=en
https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2021.03.004
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/37088460304
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/37088459594
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/37088460046
https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=uk&user=OHacy1QAAAAJ&citation_for_view=OHacy1QAAAAJ:YOwf2qJgpHMC
https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=uk&user=OHacy1QAAAAJ&citation_for_view=OHacy1QAAAAJ:YOwf2qJgpHMC
https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2020.01.014
https://doi.org/10.15407/pge2019.04.013
System Research in Energy. 2023. 1(72) 11
21. Buratynsky, I., Nechaieva, T., Shulzhenko, S., & Ivanenko, N. (2021). The Optimization of PV-plant's DC/AC
Equipment Ratio Using the Non-linear Least-cost Model. IEEE 3rd Ukraine Conference on Electrical and
Computer Engineering (UKRCON), Lviv, Ukraine, 358–362.
https://doi.org/10.1109/UKRCON53503.2021.9575720
ВПЛИВ ОБСЯГІВ ВПРОВАДЖЕННЯ ЕЛЕКТРОТРАНСПОРТУ
НА ФУНКЦІОНУВАННЯ ОБ’ЄДНАНОЇ ЕНЕРГЕТИЧНОЇ
СИСТЕМИ УКРАЇНИ
Наталія Іваненко, к.т.н., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-1556
Інститут загальної енергетики НАН України, вул. Антоновича, 172, м. Київ, 03150,
Україна;
e-mail: ivan_na@i.ua
Анотація. Стрімкий розвиток електротранспорту у світі зумовлений значними економічними та
екологічними перевагами. Український уряд також планує розробити національну стратегію та
плани впровадження електротранспорту, але додаткове навантаження створює виклики для
Об’єднаної енергосистеми України. Аналіз впливу впровадження електротранспорту на
функціонування ОЕС сприяв би ефективній реалізації намірів уряду. Метою даної роботи було
оцінити вплив обсягів впровадження електротранспорту на роботу Об’єднаної енергосистеми,
споживання викопного палива, парникові гази та викиди забруднюючих речовин. Проведено
комплекс розрахунків для обсягів електротранспорту від 30 до 420 тис. електромобілів кроком 30
тис. на основі програмно-інформаційного комплексу моделювання роботи ОЕС України, який
розробляється в Інституті загальної енергетики Національної академії наук України. Розрахунки
свідчать, що частка атомних електростанцій в Об’єднаній енергосистемі України зростає
відповідно до зростання парку електротранспорту, тому очікується зменшення споживання
палива, а також викидів парникових газів і забруднюючих речовин. Паливоємність зменшується
приблизно на 5% для електротранспорту обсягом 150 тис. і приблизно на 8% для 300 тис.
Питомі викиди зменшуються швидше за рахунок співвідношення вугільних і газових
електростанцій. Паливоємність значно коливається від 0,07 (літо) до 0,15 (зима) т.у.п./кВт·год.
Загалом додаткове навантаження від впровадження електротранспорту позитивно впливає на
енергетичну систему України, підвищуючи ефективність її роботи за рахунок зменшення
питомих витрат палива. Слід зазначити, що такі тенденції спостерігаються виключно для
України через специфіку структури її ОЕС з великою часткою атомної енергетики.
Ключові слова: електричний транспорт, Об’єднана енергетична система України, викиди
парникових газів, викиди забруднюючих речовин.
Надійшла до редколегії: 30.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/UKRCON53503.2021.9575720
mailto:ivan_na@i.ua
|
| id | systemreorg-article-11 |
| institution | System Research in Energy |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2026-07-19T01:00:59Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | General Energy Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | systemreorg/4c/ac7c3c1f2f5de27c3f50493fb69e0a4c.pdf |
| spelling | systemreorg-article-112026-07-18T12:57:29Z THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER SYSTEM FUNCTIONING ВПЛИВ ОБСЯГІВ ВПРОВАДЖЕННЯ ЕЛЕКТРОТРАНСПОРТУ НА ФУНКЦІОНУВАННЯ ОБ’ЄДНАНОЇ ЕНЕРГЕТИЧНОЇ СИСТЕМИ УКРАЇНИ Nataliia Ivanenko electric transportation, Ukraine’s Integrated Power System, greenhouse gas emissions, pollutant emissions. електричний транспорт, Об’єднана енергетична система України, викиди парникових газів, викиди забруднюючих речовин. The rapid development of electric transportation in the world is due to significant economic and ecological advantages. The Ukrainian government also is planning to develop a national strategy and plans for the implementation of electric transportation. But the additional load poses challenges for Ukraine’s Integrated Power System. The analysis of the influence of electric transportation introduction on Integrated Power System operation would facilitate its effective government implementation. The aim of this paper was to estimate the effect of implementation volumes of electric transportation on the Integrated Power System operation, fossil fuel consumption, greenhouse gases, and pollutant emissions. A set of calculations was carried out for electric transportation volumes from 30 to 420 thousand electric vehicles by step 30 thousand based on a program and information complex simulating the operation of Ukraine's Integrated Power System, which has been developed in the Institute of General Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine for the past few years. The calculations show that the share of nuclear power plants in Ukraine’s Integrated Power System increases according to the growth of the electric vehicles fleet. Therefore, it is expected to decrease fuel consumption as well as greenhouse gases and pollutants emissions. Fuel intensity is reduced by approximately 5% for electric transportation volume of 150 thousand and approximately 8% for 300 thousand. Specific emissions decrease faster due to the ratio of coal and gas power plants. Fuel intensity considerably varies from 0.07 (Summer) to 0.15 (Winter) tce/kWh. In general, the additional load from the implementation of electric transportation positively affects the energy system of Ukraine, increasing the efficiency of its operation by reducing specific fuel consumption. It should be noted that such trends are observed exclusively for Ukraine due to the specific structure of Ukraine's Integrated Power System with the large share of nuclear energy. Стрімкий розвиток електротранспорту у світі зумовлений значними економічними та екологічними перевагами. Український уряд також планує розробити національну стратегію та плани впровадження електротранспорту, але додаткове навантаження створює виклики для Об’єднаної енергосистеми України. Аналіз впливу впровадження електротранспорту на функціонування ОЕС сприяв би ефективній реалізації намірів уряду. Метою даної роботи було оцінити вплив обсягів впровадження електротранспорту на роботу Об’єднаної енергосистеми, споживання викопного палива, парникові гази та викиди забруднюючих речовин. Проведено комплекс розрахунків для обсягів електротранспорту від 30 до 420 тис. електромобілів кроком 30 тис. на основі програмно-інформаційного комплексу моделювання роботи ОЕС України, який розробляється в Інституті загальної енергетики Національної академії наук України. Розрахунки свідчать, що частка атомних електростанцій в Об’єднаній енергосистемі України зростає відповідно до зростання парку електротранспорту, тому очікується зменшення споживання палива, а також викидів парникових газів і забруднюючих речовин. Паливоємність зменшується приблизно на 5% для електротранспорту обсягом 150 тис. і приблизно на 8% для 300 тис. Питомі викиди зменшуються швидше за рахунок співвідношення вугільних і газових електростанцій. Паливоємність значно коливається від 0,07 (літо) до 0,15 (зима) т.у.п./кВт*год. Загалом додаткове навантаження від впровадження електротранспорту позитивно впливає на енергетичну систему України, підвищуючи ефективність її роботи за рахунок зменшення питомих витрат палива. Слід зазначити, що такі тенденції спостерігаються виключно дляУкраїни через специфіку структури її ОЕС з великою часткою атомної енергетики. General Energy Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2023-04-07 Article Article application/pdf https://systemre.org/index.php/journal/article/view/11 10.15407/srenergy2023.01.004 System Research in Energy; No. 1 (72) (2023): System Research in Energy; 4-11 Системні дослідження в енергетиці; № 1 (72) (2023): Системні дослідження в енергетиці; 4-11 2786-7102 2786-7633 en https://systemre.org/index.php/journal/article/view/11/9 Copyright (c) 2023 Nataliia Ivanenko https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 |
| spellingShingle | electric transportation Ukraine’s Integrated Power System greenhouse gas emissions pollutant emissions. Nataliia Ivanenko THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER SYSTEM FUNCTIONING |
| title | THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER SYSTEM FUNCTIONING |
| title_alt | ВПЛИВ ОБСЯГІВ ВПРОВАДЖЕННЯ ЕЛЕКТРОТРАНСПОРТУ НА ФУНКЦІОНУВАННЯ ОБ’ЄДНАНОЇ ЕНЕРГЕТИЧНОЇ СИСТЕМИ УКРАЇНИ |
| title_full | THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER SYSTEM FUNCTIONING |
| title_fullStr | THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER SYSTEM FUNCTIONING |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER SYSTEM FUNCTIONING |
| title_short | THE IMPACT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION ON THE UKRAINE’S INTEGRATED POWER SYSTEM FUNCTIONING |
| title_sort | impact of the implementation of electric transportation on the ukraine’s integrated power system functioning |
| topic | electric transportation Ukraine’s Integrated Power System greenhouse gas emissions pollutant emissions. |
| topic_facet | electric transportation Ukraine’s Integrated Power System greenhouse gas emissions pollutant emissions. електричний транспорт Об’єднана енергетична система України викиди парникових газів викиди забруднюючих речовин. |
| url | https://systemre.org/index.php/journal/article/view/11 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nataliiaivanenko theimpactoftheimplementationofelectrictransportationontheukrainesintegratedpowersystemfunctioning AT nataliiaivanenko vplivobsâgívvprovadžennâelektrotransportunafunkcíonuvannâobêdnanoíenergetičnoísistemiukraíni AT nataliiaivanenko impactoftheimplementationofelectrictransportationontheukrainesintegratedpowersystemfunctioning |