Comparison of the new improved combination approach that deal with conflict data with Yager’s solution approach
Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is the most effective approach to process imprecise and incomplete information. But Dempster’s combination rule can not deal with conflicting data and can lead to illogical results. That’s why the combination of conflicting bodies of evidence is one of the most diffic...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2018 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Ukrainian |
| Опубліковано: |
Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth Institute of Geological Science National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
2018
|
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://ujrs.org.ua/ujrs/article/view/125 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Ukrainian Journal of Remote Sensing of the Earth |
Репозитарії
Ukrainian Journal of Remote Sensing of the Earth| Резюме: | Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is the most effective approach to process imprecise and incomplete information. But Dempster’s combination rule can not deal with conflicting data and can lead to illogical results. That’s why the combination of conflicting bodies of evidence is one of the most difficult problems. Yager’s solution approach can process conflicting data, but correlation among evidences is not taken into account. It was proposed a new combination method, that uses correlation among different bodies of evidence and give accurate results. |
|---|