Вивчення впливу масової частки порошків різних типів на теплопровідність та гомогенність суміші епоксидної смоли
In this study investigated the effects of weight fractions (10–50 wt%) of carbon nanoparticles (CNP), Al2O3, NiO, and ZnO powders on the thermal conductivity and homogeneity of a 50 : 50 epoxy blend resin. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed distinct surface morphologies: NiO composites show...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2026 |
|---|---|
| Автори: | , |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Англійська |
| Опубліковано: |
Publishing house "Academperiodika"
2026
|
| Теми: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://ujp.bitp.kiev.ua/index.php/ujp/article/view/2023408 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Ukrainian Journal of Physics |
Репозитарії
Ukrainian Journal of Physics| Резюме: | In this study investigated the effects of weight fractions (10–50 wt%) of carbon nanoparticles (CNP), Al2O3, NiO, and ZnO powders on the thermal conductivity and homogeneity of a 50 : 50 epoxy blend resin. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed distinct surface morphologies: NiO composites showed smooth surfaces with minimal gaps at low concentrations but developed large voids at 50 wt%, while Al2O3 surfaces exhibited fractures and increased blistering at higher loadings. ZnO and CNP composites displayed rough, porous surfaces with significant agglomeration at 50 wt%. Thermally, all fillers enhanced conductivity relative to the unreinforced epoxy (0.938 W/(m · K)), with NiO exhibiting the highest improvement (32.5–46.3%), followed by ZnO (28–38.7%), Al2O3 (19.5–31.3%), and CNP (11.2–16.7%). Homogeneity testing via γ-ray attenuation (241Am source) demonstrated that ZnO composites achieved the highest homogeneity (lowest Δμ% and standard deviation σμ = 0.004–0.02%), whereas NiO composites were the least homogeneous. Crucially, ZnO’s uniform particle distribution also provided superior gamma-ray shielding (μ = 0.108–0.205 cm−1), while NiO’s heterogeneity compromised its attenuation efficacy. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.15407/ujpe71.5.478 |