Local cohomology modules and their properties

UDC 512.5 Let $(R, \mathfrak{m})$ be a complete Noetherian local ring and let $M$ be a generalized Cohen-Macaulay $R$-module of dimension $d \geq 2.$We show that$$D \left(H_{\mathfrak{m}}^d\Big(D \big(H_{\mathfrak{m}}^d(D_{\mathfrak{m}}(M))\big)\Big)\right) \approx D_{\mathfrak{m}} (M),$$where $D =...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2021
Автори: Azami, J., Hasanzad, M.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2021
Онлайн доступ:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/127
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860506980718739456
author Azami, J.
Hasanzad, M.
Azami, J.
Hasanzad, M.
author_facet Azami, J.
Hasanzad, M.
Azami, J.
Hasanzad, M.
author_sort Azami, J.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2025-03-31T08:48:28Z
description UDC 512.5 Let $(R, \mathfrak{m})$ be a complete Noetherian local ring and let $M$ be a generalized Cohen-Macaulay $R$-module of dimension $d \geq 2.$We show that$$D \left(H_{\mathfrak{m}}^d\Big(D \big(H_{\mathfrak{m}}^d(D_{\mathfrak{m}}(M))\big)\Big)\right) \approx D_{\mathfrak{m}} (M),$$where $D = {\rm Hom} (-, E)$ and $D_{\mathfrak{m}} (-)$ is the ideal transform functor. Also, assuming that $I$ is a proper ideal of a local ring $R$, we obtain some results on the finiteness of Bass numbers, cofinitness, and cominimaxness of local cohomology modules with respect to $I.$
doi_str_mv 10.37863/umzh.v73i2.127
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:02:02Z
format Article
fulltext К О Р О Т К I П О В I Д О М Л Е Н Н Я DOI: 10.37863/umzh.v73i2.127 UDC 512.5 J. Azami, M. Hasanzad (Univ. Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran) LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES AND THEIR PROPERTIES ЛОКАЛЬНI КОГОМОЛОГIЧНI МОДУЛI ТА ЇХНI ВЛАСТИВОСТI Let (R,m) be a complete Noetherian local ring and let M be a generalized Cohen-Macaulay R-module of dimension d \geq 2. We show that D \Bigl( Hd m \Bigl( D \bigl( Hd m(Dm(M)) \bigr) \Bigr) \Bigr) \approx Dm(M), where D = \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}( - , E) and Dm( - ) is the ideal transform functor. Also, assuming that I is a proper ideal of a local ring R, we obtain some results on the finiteness of Bass numbers, cofinitness, and cominimaxness of local cohomology modules with respect to I. Нехай (R,m) — повне локальне нетерове кiльце, а M — узагальнений R-модуль Коена – Маколея, що має розмiрнiсть d \geq 2. Доведено, що D \Bigl( Hd m \Bigl( D \bigl( Hd m(Dm(M)) \bigr) \Bigr) \Bigr) \approx Dm(M), де D = \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}( - , E) i Dm( - ) — функтор перетворення iдеалу. Також якщо I є нетривiальним iдеалом локального кiльця R, отримано деякi результати щодо фiнiтностi чисел Басса, кофiнiтностi та комiнiмаксностi локальних модулiв когомологiї вiдносно I. 1. Introduction. Throughout this paper, let R denote a commutative Noetherian local ring (with identity) and I an ideal of R. For an R-module M, the ith local cohomology module of M with respect to I is defined as H i I(M) = \mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m} - \rightarrow n\geq 1 \mathrm{E}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{t}iR(R/In,M). For more details about local cohomology modules see [2, 4]. We shall refer to DI as the I - transform functor. Note that this functor is left exact. For an R-module M, we call DI(M) = = \mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m} - \rightarrow n\geq 1 \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}R(I n,M) the ideal transform of M with respect to I, or, alternatively, the I -transform of M. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring and let M be a non-zero finitely generated R-module of dimension n > 0. We say that M is a generalized Cohen – Macaulay R-module precisely when H i I(M) is finitely generated for all i \not = n. (Such modules were called ”quasi-Cohen – Macaulay modules” by P. Schenzel in [11].) Also we shall use D to denote the exact, contravariant, R-linear functor \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}R( - , E), where E := E(R/m) is the injective envelope of the simple R-module R/m. For each R-module L, we denote set \{ p \in \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}R L : \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}R/p = \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}L\} by \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}RL. Also, for any ideal b of R, the radical of b, denoted by \mathrm{R}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}(b), is defined to be the set \{ x \in R : xn \in b for some n \in \BbbN \} and we denote \{ p \in \mathrm{S}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}(R) : p \supseteq b\} by V (b). For any unexplained notation and terminology we refer the reader to [2, 3, 6]. c\bigcirc J. AZAMI, M. HASANZAD, 2021 268 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2021, т. 73, № 2 LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES AND THEIR PROPERTIES 269 2. Ideal transform and local cohomology. Lemma 2.1. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring and let M be an R-module of dimension d \geq 2. Then D \bigl( Hd m \bigl( D \bigl( Hd m(M) \bigr) \bigr) \bigr) \approx D \bigl( Hd m \bigl( D \bigl( Hd m (Dm(M)) \bigr) \bigr) \bigr) , where D = \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}( - , E) and Dm( - ) is the ideal transform. Proof. Consider the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow M \Gamma m(M) - \rightarrow Dm \biggl( M \Gamma m(M) \biggr) - \rightarrow H1 m \biggl( M \Gamma m(M) \biggr) - \rightarrow 0 or 0 - \rightarrow M \Gamma m(M) - \rightarrow Dm(M) - \rightarrow H1 m(M) - \rightarrow 0. The above exact sequences induce an exact sequence H1 m \bigl( H1 m(M) \bigr) - \rightarrow H2 m \biggl( M \Gamma m(M) \biggr) - \rightarrow H2 m(Dm(M)) - \rightarrow H2 m \bigl( H1 m(M) \bigr) - \rightarrow . . . . Since H1 m \bigl( H1 m(M) \bigr) = H2 m \bigl( H1 m(M) \bigr) = 0, hence H2 m \biggl( M \Gamma m(M) \biggr) \approx H2 m(Dm(M)). Now, for all i \geq 2 and, in particular, for i = d, we have H i m(M) = H i m \biggl( M \Gamma m(M) \biggr) \approx H i m(Dm(M)), Hd m(M) \approx Hd m(Dm(M)). Consequently, D \bigl( Hd m \bigl( D \bigl( Hd m(M) \bigr) \bigr) \bigr) \approx D \bigl( Hd m \bigl( D \bigl( Hd m (Dm(M)) \bigr) \bigr) \bigr) . Lemma 2.2. Let (R,m) be a complete Noetherian local ring and let M be a generalized Co- hen – Macaulay R-module of dimension d \geq 2. Let x1, . . . , xd be an m-filter regular sequence for Dm(M) and for 0 \leq i \leq d, we set Li = H i m(Dm(M)), Ki = H i (x1,...,xi) (Dm(M)) and Ti = \biggl( Ki Li \biggr) xi+1 . Then Hd m(D(Ld)) \approx Hd - 1 m \biggl( D \biggl( Kd - 1 Ld - 1 \biggr) \biggr) , Hd - 1 m (D(Kd - 1)) \approx Hd - 2 m \biggl( D \biggl( Kd - 2 Ld - 2 \biggr) \biggr) . Proof. Let N = Dm(M). Since \Gamma m(N) = H1 m(N) = 0, so N is a generalized Cohen – Macualay module of dimension d \geq 2. Now, let x1, . . . , xd be an m-filter regular sequence for N. Consider the following exact sequences: 0 - \rightarrow N - \rightarrow T0 - \rightarrow K1 - \rightarrow 0, 0 - \rightarrow K1 - \rightarrow T1 - \rightarrow K2 - \rightarrow 0, 0 - \rightarrow K2 L2 - \rightarrow T2 - \rightarrow K3 - \rightarrow 0, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2021, т. 73, № 2 270 J. AZAMI, M. HASANZAD 0 - \rightarrow Kd - 2 Ld - 2 - \rightarrow Td - 2 - \rightarrow Kd - 1 - \rightarrow 0, 0 - \rightarrow Kd - 1 Ld - 1 - \rightarrow Td - 1 - \rightarrow Ld - \rightarrow 0, where, by [10] (Corollary 2.6), K2 \approx H1 Rx2 (K1) and also we have the following: L2 = H2 m(N) \approx \Gamma Rx3 \bigl( H2 Rx1+Rx2 (N) \bigr) \approx \Gamma m \Bigl( H2 (x1,x2) (N) \Bigr) \approx \Gamma m(K2). The above exact sequences induces the following exact sequences: 0 - \rightarrow D(Ld) - \rightarrow D(Td - 1) - \rightarrow D \biggl( Kd - 1 Ld - 1 \biggr) - \rightarrow 0, 0 - \rightarrow D(Kd - 1) - \rightarrow D(Td - 2) - \rightarrow D \biggl( Kd - 2 Ld - 2 \biggr) - \rightarrow 0, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 - \rightarrow D(K3) - \rightarrow D(T2) - \rightarrow D \biggl( K2 L2 \biggr) - \rightarrow 0, 0 - \rightarrow D(K2) - \rightarrow D(T1) - \rightarrow D(K1) - \rightarrow 0, 0 - \rightarrow D(K1) - \rightarrow D(T0) - \rightarrow D(N) - \rightarrow 0. Since for xi+1 \in m, the map Ti xi+1 - - - \rightarrow Ti is an isomorphism, so, for all j \geq 0, the map Hj m(D(Ti)) xi+1 - - - \rightarrow Hj m(D(Ti)) is an isomorphism. On the other hand, Hj m(D(Ti)) is m-torsion and so is an Rxi+1-torsion. It follows that Hj m(D(Ti)) = 0 for all j \geq 0. Therefore, we have Hd m(D(Ld)) \approx Hd - 1 m \biggl( D \biggl( Kd - 1 Ld - 1 \biggr) \biggr) , Hd - 1 m (D(Kd - 1)) \approx Hd - 2 m \biggl( D \biggl( Kd - 2 Ld - 2 \biggr) \biggr) , (2.1) H2 m(D(K2)) \approx H1 m(D(K1)), H1 m(D(K1)) \approx D(N). Theorem 2.1. Let the situation and notation be as in Lemma 2.2. Then D \Bigl( Hd m \Bigl( D \Bigl( Hd m(Dm(M)) \Bigr) \Bigr) \Bigr) \approx Dm(M). Proof. Note that, for all 2 \leq i \leq d - 1, the R-module Li is of finite length and so is D(Li). Hence, for all j \geq 1 and 2 \leq i \leq d - 1, Hj m(D(Li)) = 0. By the notation of previous lemma, the exact sequence ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2021, т. 73, № 2 LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES AND THEIR PROPERTIES 271 0 - \rightarrow Li - \rightarrow Ki - \rightarrow Ki Li - \rightarrow 0 induces the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow D \biggl( Ki Li \biggr) - \rightarrow D(Ki) - \rightarrow D(Li) - \rightarrow 0. Now we can write Hj m \biggl( D \biggl( Ki Li \biggr) \biggr) \approx Hj m(D(Ki)) (2.2) for j \geq 2. Finally, from (2.1) and (2.2), we have the following: Hd m \Bigl( D \Bigl( Hd m(N) \Bigr) \Bigr) \approx Hd - 1 m \biggl( D \biggl( Kd - 1 Ld - 1 \biggr) \biggr) \approx Hd - 1 m (Kd - 1) \approx Hd - 2 m \biggl( Kd - 2 Ld - 2 \biggr) \approx \approx Hd - 2 m (Kd - 2) \approx \cdot \cdot \cdot \approx H2 m(D(K2)) \approx H1 m(D(K1)) \approx D(N). Consequently, Hd m \bigl( D \bigl( Hd m(N) \bigr) \bigr) \approx D(N). Since R is complete, it follows that D \Bigl( Hd m \Bigl( D \Bigl( Hd m(N) \Bigr) \Bigr) \Bigr) \approx D(D(N)) \approx N = Dm(M). Corollary 2.1. Let (R,m) be a complete Noetherian local ring and let M be a generalized Co- hen – Macaulay R-module of dimension d \geq 2. Then \bigl( D(Hd m(M) \bigr) is Cohen – Macaulay iff Dm(M) is Cohen – Macaulay and this is equivalent to the following:\bigl\{ i \in \BbbN 0 : H i m(M) \not = 0 \bigr\} \subseteq \{ 0, 1, d\} . Proof. The assertion follows immediately from above theorem. 3. Cofiniteness and cominimaxness of local cohomology modules. Lemma 3.1. Let I be an ideal of a commutative Noetherian ring R of dimension one. Let M(R, I)com denote the category of I -cominimax modules over R. Then M(R, I)com forms an Abelian subcategory of the category of all R-modules. That is, if f : M - \rightarrow N is an R-homomorphism of I -cominimax modules, then \mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r} f and \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}f are I -cominimax. Proof. See [5] (Theorem 2.6). Remark 3.1. For Noetherian local ring (R,m) of dimension d \geq 1 and proper ideal I of R, we set T1 = \{ p \in \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}(R)| \mathrm{R}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}(p+ I) = m\} , T2 = \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}R(R)\setminus T1. Let 0 = \bigcap pi\in Ass(R) qi be a minimal primary decomposition for the zero ideal of R such that qi is pi-primary. If L1 = \bigcap qi\in T1 qi and L2 = \bigcap qi\in T2 qi, then \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s} R L1 = T1 and \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s} R L2 = T2. By [2] (Theorem 8.2.1), Hd I \biggl( R L2 \biggr) = 0 and H i I \biggl( R L1 \biggr) \approx H i m \biggl( R L1 \biggr) for all i \geq 0. Thus, H i I \biggl( R L1 \biggr) is Artinian for all i \geq 0 and \mathrm{c}\mathrm{d} \biggl( I, R L2 \biggr) \leq d - 1. On the other hand, \mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{n}(L2) \subseteq \mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{n}(L2M), so \mathrm{S}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}(L2M) \subseteq \mathrm{S}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}(L2). Therefore, H i I(L2M) \approx \approx H i m(L2M) for all i \geq 0 and H i I(L2M) is Artinian for i \geq 0. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2021, т. 73, № 2 272 J. AZAMI, M. HASANZAD Theorem 3.1. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring of dimension d \geq 1 and I be a proper ideal of R. Then the following statements are equivalent: (1) the Bass-numbers of Hd - 1 I (R) are finite; (2) for any finitely generated R-module M, the Bass numbers of Hd - 1 I (M) are finite; (3) Hd - 1 I (R) is I -cominimax; (4) for any finitely generated R-module M, the R-module Hd - 1 I (M) is I -cominimax. Proof. 1 \updownarrow 3. Follows from [1] (Theorem 2.12). 2 \rightarrow 1. Is clear. 2 \updownarrow 4. If \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M = d the assertion follows from [8] (Proposition 5.1). If \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M \leq d - 1, then Hd - 1 I (M) is Artinian. 1 \rightarrow 2. Let M be a finitely generated R-module. If \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M < d - 1, then Hd - 1 I (M) = 0 and the result follows. If \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M = d - 1, then Hd - 1 I (M) is Artinian and by [8] (Proposition 5.1). Therefore we assume that \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M = d. By [1] (Theorem 2.12), the Bass numbers of Hd - 1 I (M) are finite iff \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}R \biggl( R m , Hd - 1 I (M) \biggr) be a finitely generated. Therefore with out lose of generality, we may assume that (R,m) is a complete Noetherian local ring. By notation in Remark 3.1, from the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow L2 - \rightarrow R L1 - \rightarrow R L1 + L2 - \rightarrow 0, we have \mathrm{S}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}(L2) \subseteq \mathrm{S}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \biggl( R L1 \biggr) and H i I(L2) \approx H i m(L2) for i \geq 0. Also, the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow L2 - \rightarrow R - \rightarrow R L2 - \rightarrow 0 induces the following exact sequence: Hd - 1 I (L2) - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (R) - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I \biggl( R L2 \biggr) - \rightarrow Hd I (L2) - \rightarrow . . . , which implies that Hd - 1 I \biggl( R L2 \biggr) is I -cominimax. Since \mathrm{c}\mathrm{d} \biggl( I, R L2 \biggr) \leq d - 1, it follows that Hd - 1 I \biggl( R L2 \biggr) \otimes M \approx Hd - 1 I \biggl( R L2 \otimes M \biggr) \approx Hd - 1 I \biggl( M L2M \biggr) . Thus, by Lemma 3.1, Hd - 1 I \biggl( M L2M \biggr) is I -cominimax (for this we consider a free resolution of M ). Also, from the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow L2M - \rightarrow M - \rightarrow M L2M - \rightarrow 0 we have the following exact sequence: Hd - 1 I (L2M) - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (M) - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I \biggl( M L2M \biggr) - \rightarrow Hd I (L2M). By Remark 3.1, it follows that Hd - 1 I (M) is I -cominimax. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2021, т. 73, № 2 LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES AND THEIR PROPERTIES 273 Lemma 3.2. Let R be a Noetherian ring, I an ideal of R and M an R-module such that \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M \leq 1. Then for all n \geq 0 and all finitely generated R-module K, the R-module \mathrm{T}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}Rn (K,M) is I -cofinite. Proof. See [9] (Lemma 3.3). Lemma 3.3. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring and M be a non-zero finitely generated R-module such that \surd I +\mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{n}M = m. Then R-module Hn I (M) is Artinian and I -cofinite, for all n \geq 0. Proof. We have the following relations: Hn I (M) \simeq Hn I+AnnM/AnnM (M) = Hn m/AnnM (M) \simeq Hn m(M). So the R-module Hn I (M) is Artinian. On the other hand, we have \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}R(R/I,Hn I (M)) \simeq \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}R (R/I,\mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}R (R/\mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{n}M,Hn I (M))) \simeq \simeq \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}R (R/\mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{n}M + I,Hn I (M)) . Now, since the R-module \mathrm{H}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{m}R (R/I +\mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{n}M,Hn I (M)) is of finite length and Hn I (M) is Arti- nian, so Hn I (M) is I -cofinite by [8] (Proposition 4.1). Remark 3.2. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian complete local ring of dimension d \geq 1 and let I be an ideal of R. If \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p}\{ n \in \BbbN 0 : Hn I (M) \not = 0\} = d, since R is complete, then from Lichtenbaum – Hartshorn vanishing theorem, the set A = \bigl\{ p \in \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}R| \surd p+ I = m \bigr\} is non empty. Set J = \bigcap p\in A p. Also we have m\mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}M/\Gamma J(M) \subseteq \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}M\setminus V (J) \subseteq \mathrm{S}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}(R)\setminus A. Then by Lichtenbaum – Hartshorn vanishing theorem, Hd I (R/\Gamma J(R)) = 0. Since M/\Gamma J(M) is an R/\Gamma J(R)-module, it follows that Hd I (M/\Gamma J(M)) = 0. On the other hand, \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s} \Gamma J(R) = \mathrm{A}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{s}R \cap V (J) = A. So, \sqrt{} \mathrm{A}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{n}\Gamma J(R) + I = m. In particular, by Lemma 3.3, the R-module H i I(\Gamma J(R)) is Artinian and I -cofinite for each i. Theorem 3.2. Let (R,m) be a Noetherian complete local ring of dimension d \geq 1 and let I be an ideal of R. Then the following statements are equivalent: (i) Hd - 1 I (R) is I -cofinite; (ii) for every finitely generated R-module M, the R-module Hd - 1 I (M) is I -cofinite. Proof. (ii)\rightarrow (i) is clear. (i)\rightarrow (ii) If \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M < d - 1, then Hd - 1 I (M) = 0. If \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M = d - 1, then by [8] (Proposition 5.1), Hd - 1 I (M) is I -cofinite. Now, let \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}M = d and \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} \bigl\{ n \in \BbbN 0 : Hn I (M) \not = 0 \bigr\} = d - 1. Then by [2] (Excercise 6.1.8), Hd - 1 I (M) \simeq Hd - 1 I (R)\otimes R M and by Lemma 3.1, Hd - 1 I (M) is I -cofinite. Note that, in view of [7] (Corollary 2.5), \mathrm{S}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p}Hd - 1 I (R) is finite and so its dimension is at most one. Therefore, we assume that \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} \{ n \in \BbbN 0 : Hn I (M) \not = 0\} = d. By notation in Remark 3.2, we have the following exact sequence: 0 - \rightarrow \Gamma J(R) - \rightarrow R - \rightarrow R/\Gamma J(R) - \rightarrow 0, that induces the long exact sequence . . . - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (\Gamma J(R)) f - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (R) g - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (R/\Gamma J(R)) h - \rightarrow Hd I (\Gamma J(R)) - \rightarrow . . . . ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2021, т. 73, № 2 274 J. AZAMI, M. HASANZAD Note that the category of Artinian I -cofinite modules is a Serre category and so \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}f is I -cofinite. Now from the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m} f - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (R) - \rightarrow \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m} g - \rightarrow 0, we deduce that \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}g is I -cofinite. Since \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}h is also I -cofinite, it follows from the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m} g - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (R/\Gamma J(R)) - \rightarrow \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}h - \rightarrow 0 that Hd - 1 I (R/\Gamma J(R)) is I -cofinite and of dimension at most one. Now, by Lemma 3.2 and the fact that Hd - 1 I (M/\Gamma J(M)) \simeq Hd - 1 I (R/\Gamma J(R))\otimes RM, we deduce that Hd - 1 I (M/\Gamma J(M)) is I -cofinite. From the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow \Gamma J(M) - \rightarrow M - \rightarrow M/\Gamma J(M) - \rightarrow 0, we obtain the following long exact sequence: . . . - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (\Gamma J(M)) f1 - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (M) f2 - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (M/\Gamma J(M)) f3 - \rightarrow Hd I (\Gamma J(M)) - \rightarrow . . . . For all n \geq 0, the R-module Hn I (\Gamma J(M)) is Artinian and I -cofinite, so by the above long exact sequence, \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}f3 and \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}f2 are I -cofinite. Therefore, from the exact sequence 0 - \rightarrow \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}f1 - \rightarrow Hd - 1 I (M) - \rightarrow \mathrm{I}\mathrm{m}f2 - \rightarrow 0, we deduce that Hd - 1 I (M) is also I -cofinite. References 1. K. Bahmanpour, R. Naghipour, M. Sedghi, On the finiteness of Bass numbers of local cohomology modules and cominimaxness, Houston J. Math., 40, № 2, 319 – 337 (2014). 2. M. P. Brodmann, R. Y. Sharp, Local cohomology; an algebraic introduction with geometric applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1998). 3. W. Bruns, J. Herzog, Cohen Macualay rings, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. (1997). 4. A. Grothendieck, Local cohomology, Notes by R. Hartshorne, Lect. Notes Math., 862, Springer, New York (1966). 5. Y. Irani, K. Bahmanpour, Cominimaxness of local cohomology modules for ideals of dimension one, preprint. 6. H. Matsumura, Commutative ring theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK (1986). 7. T. Marley, The associated primes of local cohomology modules over rings of small dimension, Manuscripta Math., 104, 519 – 525 (2001). 8. L. Melkersson, Modules cofinite with respect to an ideal, J. Algebra, 285, 649 – 668 (2005). 9. R. Naghipour, K. Bahmanpour, I. Khalili Gorji, Cofiniteness of torsion functors of cofinite modules, Colloq. Math., 136, 221 – 230 (2014). 10. P. Schenzel, Proregular sequences, local cohomology, and completion, Math. Scand., 92, 161 – 180 (2003). 11. P. Schenzel, Einige Anwendungen der lokalen Dualitat und verallgemeinerte Cohen – Macaulay – Moduln, Math. Nachr., 69, 227 – 242 (1975). Received 04.06.18 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2021, т. 73, № 2
id umjimathkievua-article-127
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:02:02Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/f8/7190eb7f1fef3b19e0f591aebc5a07f8.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-1272025-03-31T08:48:28Z Local cohomology modules and their properties Local cohomology modules and their properties Azami, J. Hasanzad, M. Azami, J. Hasanzad, M. UDC 512.5 Let $(R, \mathfrak{m})$ be a complete Noetherian local ring and let $M$ be a generalized Cohen-Macaulay $R$-module of dimension $d \geq 2.$We show that$$D \left(H_{\mathfrak{m}}^d\Big(D \big(H_{\mathfrak{m}}^d(D_{\mathfrak{m}}(M))\big)\Big)\right) \approx D_{\mathfrak{m}} (M),$$where $D = {\rm Hom} (-, E)$ and $D_{\mathfrak{m}} (-)$ is the ideal transform functor. Also, assuming that $I$ is a proper ideal of a local ring $R$, we obtain some results on the finiteness of Bass numbers, cofinitness, and cominimaxness of local cohomology modules with respect to $I.$ УДК 512.5 Локальні когомологічні модулі та їхні властивості Нехай $(R, \mathfrak{m})$ - повне локальне нетерове кільце, а $M$ - узагальнений $R$-модуль Коена-Маколея, що має розмірність $d\geq 2.$ Доведено, що$$D \left(H_{\mathfrak{m}}^d\Big(D\big(H_{\mathfrak{m}}^d(D_{\mathfrak{m}}(M))\big)\Big)\right) \approx D_{\mathfrak{m}} (M),$$де $D = {\rm Hom} (-, E)$ і $D_{\mathfrak{m}} (-)$ - функтор перетворення ідеалу. Також якщо $I$ є нетривіальним ідеалом локального кільця $R$, отримано деякі результати щодо фінітності чисел Басса, кофінітності та комінімаксності локальних модулів когомології відносно $I.$ Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2021-02-22 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/127 10.37863/umzh.v73i2.127 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 73 No. 2 (2021); 268 - 274 Український математичний журнал; Том 73 № 2 (2021); 268 - 274 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/127/8950 Copyright (c) 2021 Jafar Azami, Masoumeh Hasanzad
spellingShingle Azami, J.
Hasanzad, M.
Azami, J.
Hasanzad, M.
Local cohomology modules and their properties
title Local cohomology modules and their properties
title_alt Local cohomology modules and their properties
title_full Local cohomology modules and their properties
title_fullStr Local cohomology modules and their properties
title_full_unstemmed Local cohomology modules and their properties
title_short Local cohomology modules and their properties
title_sort local cohomology modules and their properties
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/127
work_keys_str_mv AT azamij localcohomologymodulesandtheirproperties
AT hasanzadm localcohomologymodulesandtheirproperties
AT azamij localcohomologymodulesandtheirproperties
AT hasanzadm localcohomologymodulesandtheirproperties