The structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane

We consider a difference operator approximation $A^x_h$ of the differential operator $A^xu(x) = a_{11}(x)u_{x_1 x_1}(x) - a_{22}(x)u_{x_2x_2} (x) + \sigma u(x),\; x = (x_1, x_2)$ defined in the region $R^{+} \times R$ with the boundary condition $u(0, x_2) = 0,\; x_2 \in R$. Here, the coefficients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2018
Hauptverfasser: Akturk, S., Ashyralyev, A., Актюрк, С., Аширалієв, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2018
Online Zugang:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/1614
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Institution

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860507431427112960
author Akturk, S.
Ashyralyev, A.
Актюрк, С.
Аширалієв, A.
author_facet Akturk, S.
Ashyralyev, A.
Актюрк, С.
Аширалієв, A.
author_sort Akturk, S.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2019-12-05T09:21:04Z
description We consider a difference operator approximation $A^x_h$ of the differential operator $A^xu(x) = a_{11}(x)u_{x_1 x_1}(x) - a_{22}(x)u_{x_2x_2} (x) + \sigma u(x),\; x = (x_1, x_2)$ defined in the region $R^{+} \times R$ with the boundary condition $u(0, x_2) = 0,\; x_2 \in R$. Here, the coefficients $a_{ii}(x), i = 1, 2$, are continuously differentiable, satisfy the uniform ellipticity condition $a^2_{11}(x) + a^2_{22}(x) \geq \delta > 0$. We investigate the structure of the fractional spaces generated by the analyzed difference operator. Theorems on well-posedness in a Holder space of difference elliptic problems are obtained as applications.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:09:12Z
format Article
fulltext UDC 517.9 A. Ashyralyev (Near East Univ., Nicosia, Mersin, Turkey, Inst. Math. and Math. Modeling, Almaty, Kazakhstan), S. Akturk (Yakuplu the Neighborhood Street Kubilay, Istanbul, Turkey) THE STRUCTURE OF FRACTIONAL SPACES GENERATED BY THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL DIFFERENCE OPERATOR ON THE HALF PLANE* СТРУКТУРА ДРОБОВИХ ПРОСТОРIВ, ПОРОДЖЕНИХ ДВОВИМIРНИМ ДИФЕРЕНЦIАЛЬНИМ ОПЕРАТОРОМ НА ПIВПЛОЩИНI We consider a difference operator approximation Ax h of the differential operator Axu(x) = - a11(x)ux1x1(x) - - a22(x)ux2x2(x) + \sigma u(x), x = (x1, x2) defined in the region \BbbR + \times \BbbR with the boundary condition u(0, x2) = 0, x2 \in \BbbR . Here, the coefficients aii(x), i = 1, 2, are continuously differentiable, satisfy the uniform ellipticity condi- tion a2 11(x) + a2 22(x) \geq \delta > 0, and \sigma > 0. We investigate the structure of the fractional spaces generated by the analyzed difference operator. Theorems on well-posedness in a Hölder space of difference elliptic problems are obtained as applications. Розглянуто апроксимацiю рiзницевими операторами Ax h диференцiального оператора Axu(x) = - a11(x)ux1x1(x) - - a22(x)ux2x2(x) + \sigma u(x), x = (x1, x2), що визначений у областi \BbbR + \times \BbbR , з граничною умовою u(0, x2) = 0, x2 \in \BbbR . У даному випадку коефiцiєнти aii(x), i = 1, 2, є неперервно диференцiйовними та задовольняють рiвномiрну умову елiптичностi a2 11(x) + a2 22(x) \geq \delta > 0 i, крiм того, \sigma > 0. Теореми про коректнiсть рiзницевих елiптичних задач у просторах Гьольдера одержанi як застосування. 1. Introduction. The importance of the positivity property of the differential operators in a Banach space in the study of various properties for partial differential equations is well-known (see, for example, [1 – 8] and the references therein). The positivity of wider class of differential and difference operators in Banach spaces have been investigated by many scientists (see [9 – 14] and the references therein). The structure of fractional spaces generated by positive multidimensional differential and dif- ference operators on space \BbbR n and one dimensional differential and difference operators in Banach spaces has been well investigated (see [16 – 21] and the references therein). Note that the structure of fractional spaces generated by positive multidimensional differential and difference operators with local and nonlocal conditions on \Omega \subset \BbbR n in Banach spaces C (\Omega ) has not been well studied. It is well-known that (see, for example, [16]) the operator A is said to be positive in E if its spectrum \sigma (A) lies inside of the sector S of the angle \phi , 0 < 2\phi < 2\pi , symmetric with respect to the real axis, and the estimate \bigm\| \bigm\| (A - \lambda ) - 1 \bigm\| \bigm\| E\rightarrow E \leq M(\phi ) 1 + | \lambda | holds on the edges S1(\phi ) = \bigl\{ \rho ei\phi : 0 \leq \rho <\infty \bigr\} , S2(\phi ) = \bigl\{ \rho e - i\phi : 0 \leq \rho <\infty \bigr\} of S , and outside of the sector S. The infimum of all such angles \phi is called the spectral angle of the positive operator A and is denoted by \phi (A,E). Throughout the article, M indicates positive constants which may differ from time to time and we are not interested to precise. If the constant depends only on \alpha , \beta , . . . , then we will write M(\alpha , \beta , . . .). * This paper was supported by the “RUDN University Program 5-100”. c\bigcirc A. ASHYRALYEV, S. AKTURK, 2018 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 1019 1020 A. ASHYRALYEV, S. AKTURK With the help of the positive operator A we introduce the fractional space E\beta = E\beta (E,A), 0 < \beta < 1, consisting of all elements v \in E for which the norm \| v\| E\beta = \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} \lambda >0 \lambda \beta \bigm\| \bigm\| A(\lambda +A) - 1v \bigm\| \bigm\| E + \| v\| E is finite. In the paper [21] the structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional differential operator Ax defined by Axu(x) = - a11(x)ux1x1(x) - a22(x)ux2x2(x) + \sigma u(x) (1) over the region \BbbR 2 + = \BbbR + \times \BbbR with the boundary condition u(0, x2) = 0, x2 \in \BbbR . Here, the coefficients aii(t, x), i = 1, 2, are continuously differentiable and satisfy the uniform ellipticity a211(x) + a222(x) \geq \delta > 0 (2) and \sigma > 0. In the present paper, we will study the structure of fractional spaces generated by the two- dimensional difference operator Ax h defined by formula Ax hu h(x) = - b11(x)\Delta x1 1+\Delta x1 1 - u h(x)h - 2 - b22(x)\Delta x2 1+\Delta x2 1 - u h(x)h - 2 + \sigma uh(x), x = (x1, x2), (3) approximates of the differential operator Ax defined by (1). Here \Delta x1 1\pm u(x) = \pm \bigl( uh (x1 \pm h, x2) - uh(x1, x2) \bigr) , x1, x1 + h \in \BbbR + h , x2 \in \BbbR h, \Delta x2 1\pm u(x) = \pm \bigl( uh (x1, x2 \pm h) - uh(x1, x2) \bigr) , x1 \in \BbbR + h , x2, x2 + h \in \BbbR h, \BbbR h = \bigl\{ (x2)k = kh, k = 0,\pm 1,\pm 2, . . . \bigr\} , \BbbR + h = \bigl\{ (x1)m = mh, m = 0, 1, 2, . . . \bigr\} . Assume that bii(x) satisfy the uniform ellipticity condition b211(x) + b222(x) \geq \delta > 0. Next, to formulate our result we need to introduce the Hölder space C2\alpha h = C2\alpha \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) of all bounded grid functions fh defined on \BbbR 2 h,+ = \BbbR + h \times \BbbR h satisfying a Hölder condition with the indicator \alpha \in (0, 1/2) with the norm\bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha h = \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| C \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) + \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} (x1,x2),(x\prime 1,x \prime 2)\in \BbbR 2 h,+ (x1,x2)\not =(x\prime 1,x \prime 2) \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1, x2) - fh(x\prime 1, x \prime 2) \bigm| \bigm| \biggl( \sqrt{} | x1 - x\prime 1| 2 + | x2 - x\prime 2| 2 \biggr) 2\alpha . Here Ch = C \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) denotes the Banach space of all bounded grid functions fh defined on \BbbR 2 h,+ with the norm \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| Ch = \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} (x1,x2)\in \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1, x2)\bigm| \bigm| . Our goal in this paper is to study the structure of the fractional spaces E\alpha \bigl( Ax h, C \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) \bigr) . Namelly, the following main theorem is proved. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 THE STRUCTURE OF FRACTIONAL SPACES GENERATED . . . 1021 Theorem 1. Suppose 0 < \alpha < 1/2. Then the norms of the spaces E\alpha \bigl( Ax h, C \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) \bigr) and C2\alpha \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) are equivalent uniformly in h, 0 < h \leq h0. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, auxiliary results are given. In Section 3, the proof of main Theorem 1 is presented. In Section 4, theorems on well-posedness in a Hölder space of difference elliptic problems are established. Finally, Section 5 is conclusion. 2. Auxiliary results. In this section, we give some auxiliary lemmas which will be useful in the sequel. Lemma 1. For all n,m \in Z+ and h1 > 0, b > 0 the following estimate holds: e - b(m+n)h1 \Bigl( 1 + \mathrm{l}\mathrm{n} \Bigl\{ 1 + ((m+ n)h1 + h1) - 1 \Bigr\} \Bigr) (m+ n)2\alpha h2\alpha 1 \leq M(\alpha ), n,m \in Z+. (4) Lemma 2 [15]. Let p and q be mutually conjugate exponents, that is, 1 p + 1 q = 1, p > 1, and let (am)m\in \BbbN and (bn)n\in \BbbN be any two sequences of nonnegative real numbers such that 0 < < \sum \infty m=1 apm <\infty and 0 < \sum \infty n=1 bqn <\infty . Then, the following Hilbert’s inequality holds: \infty \sum m=1 \infty \sum n=1 ambn m+ n < \pi \mathrm{c}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{c} \biggl( \pi p \biggr) \Biggl[ \infty \sum m=1 apm \Biggr] 1/p \Biggl[ \infty \sum n=1 bqn \Biggr] 1/q . S. I. Danelich in [12] considered the positivity of a difference analog Ax h of the 2mth order multidimensional elliptic operator Ax with dependent coefficients on semispaces \BbbR + \times \BbbR n - 1. Fol- lowing the paper [12], in the special case m = 1 and n = 2, we consider the problem of finding the resolvent equation of the operator - Ax Ax hu h(x) + \lambda uh(x) = fh(x), x \in \BbbR 2 h,+. (5) Let Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) be a Green function of the resolvent equation (5) for the difference operator Ax h . There exists the inverse operator (Ax h + \lambda ) - 1 for all \lambda \geq 0 and the formula (Ax h + \lambda ) - 1fh(x1, x2) = \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h Gh (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) f h(p, s)h2 (6) holds. Moreover, we have the following lemma. Lemma 3 [12]. The estimates for 0 \leq \lambda \leq Lh - 2 (L > 0)\bigm| \bigm| Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| \leq \leq C \mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p} \Bigl\{ - a(\lambda + 1)1/2 \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| \bigr) \Bigr\} \times \times \biggl( 1 + \mathrm{l}\mathrm{n} \biggl\{ 1 + \Bigl( (\lambda + 1)1/2 \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| \bigr) \Bigr) - 1 \biggr\} \biggr) , (7) \bigm| \bigm| Ghx1 (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| , \bigm| \bigm| Ghx2 (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| \leq \leq C \mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p} \Bigl\{ - a(\lambda + 1)1/2 \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| \bigr) \Bigr\} \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| + h \bigr) - 1 , (8) and for \lambda \geq Lh - 2 (L > 0) ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 1022 A. ASHYRALYEV, S. AKTURK | Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda )| \leq C \mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p} \bigl\{ - ah - 1 (| x1 - p| + | x2 - s| ) \bigr\} \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigl( (\lambda + 1)h2 + 1 \bigr) - 1 \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| , (9)\bigm| \bigm| Ghx1 (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| , \bigm| \bigm| Ghx2 (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| \leq \leq C \mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p} \bigl\{ - ah - 1 \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| \bigr) \bigr\} \bigl( (\lambda + 1)h2 + 1 \bigr) - 1 h - 1 (10) hold. Here a = a (\sigma ) . Lemma 4 [12]. Let \lambda \geq Lh - 2, where L > 0 is large enough. Then | Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda )| \leq \leq Ch \mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p} \bigl\{ - ah - 1 (| x1 - p| + | x2 - s| ) \bigr\} ((\lambda + 1)h2) - 2 (| x1 - p| + | x2 - s| ) - 1 . (11) From (9) and (11) we obtain the estimate (0 < \alpha < 1/2) | Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda )| \leq \leq Ch2\alpha \mathrm{e}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{p} \bigl\{ - ah - 1 \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| \bigr) \bigr\} \bigl( (\lambda + 1)h2 \bigr) - 2 (| x1 - p| + | x2 - s| ) - 2\alpha . (12) Clearly, from estimates (7) – (10) it follows that Ax h is a positive operator in C \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) . Moreover, from that and the commutativity of Ax h and its resolvent \bigl( Ax h + \lambda \bigr) - 1 it follows that Ax h is a positive operator in E\alpha \bigl( A,C \bigl( R2 h,+ \bigr) \bigr) . 3. Proof of Theorem 1. In this section, we will prove the main Theorem 1 on structure of fractional spaces E\alpha \bigl( Ax h, C \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) \bigr) . Namely, let (x1, x2) \in \BbbR 2 h,+ and \lambda > 0 be fixed. From formula (6) it follows that Ax h \bigl( \lambda +Ax h \bigr) - 1 fh(x1, x2) = = \lambda \alpha 1 + \lambda fh(x1, x2) + \lambda \alpha +1 \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigl( fh(x1, x2) - fh(p, s) \bigr) h2. (13) By using equation (13), the triangle inequality, and the definition of C2\alpha h -norm, we obtain\bigm| \bigm| \lambda \alpha Ax h \bigl( \lambda +Ax h \bigr) - 1 fh(x1, x2) \bigm| \bigm| \leq \leq \lambda \alpha 1 + \lambda \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1, x2)\bigm| \bigm| \bigm| + \lambda \alpha +1 \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| Gh (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1, x2) - fh(p, s) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| h2 \leq \leq \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha h \left[ \lambda \alpha 1 + \lambda + \lambda \alpha +1 \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| Gh \bigl( x1, x2, p, s, \lambda \bigr) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigl( | x1 - p| 2 + | x2 - s| 2 \bigr) \alpha h2 \right] \leq \leq \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha h \bigl[ I1 + I2 \bigr] . Here I1 = \lambda \alpha 1 + \lambda , I2 = \lambda \alpha +1 \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigl( | x1 - p| 2 + | x2 - s| 2 \bigr) \alpha h2. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 THE STRUCTURE OF FRACTIONAL SPACES GENERATED . . . 1023 It is clear that for any \lambda > 0 I1 \leq 1. (14) Therefore, we will estimate I2. Consider two cases: | \lambda | \leq Lh - 2 and | \lambda | \geq Lh - 2, respectively. First, assume that | \lambda | \leq Lh - 2. Applying estimate (7), we have I2 \leq \lambda \alpha +1M \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h e - a(1+\lambda )1/2(| x1 - p| +| x2 - s| )\times \times \Bigl( 1 + \mathrm{l}\mathrm{n} \Bigl\{ 1 + \bigl( (1 + \lambda )1/2 \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| + h \bigr) \bigr) - 1 \Bigr\} \Bigr) \bigl( | x1 - p| 2 + | x2 - s| 2 \bigr) \alpha h2. The change of variables x1 - p = mh and x2 - s = nh yields I2 \leq \lambda \alpha +1M \sum m\in Z+ \sum n\in Z+ e - a(1+\lambda )1/2(m+n)h\times \times \Bigl( 1 + \mathrm{l}\mathrm{n} \Bigl\{ 1 + \bigl( (1 + \lambda )1/2((m+ n)h+ h) \bigr) - 1 \Bigr\} \Bigr) (m+ n)2\alpha h2\alpha h2. Letting (1 + \lambda )1/2h = h1, we get I2 \leq \lambda \alpha +1 (1 + \lambda )\alpha +1 M \sum m\in Z+ \sum n\in Z+ e - a(m+n)h1\times \times \Bigl( 1 + \mathrm{l}\mathrm{n} \Bigl\{ 1 + ((m+ n)h1 + h1) - 1 \Bigr\} \Bigr) (m+ n)2\alpha h2\alpha 1 h21. Applying estimate (4) for b = a 2 , we obtain I2 \leq M1 \sum m\in Z+ \sum n\in Z+ e - a 2 (m+n)h1h21 \leq M2 \infty \int 0 \infty \int 0 e - a 2 (q+y) dq dy =M3. (15) Then from estimates (14), (15) it follows \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} (x1,x2)\in \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigm| \bigm| \lambda \alpha Ax h (A x h + \lambda ) - 1 fh(x1, x2) \bigm| \bigm| \leq M \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha h . (16) Second, assume that | \lambda | \geq Lh - 2. From estimates (9) and (12) it follows I2 \leq M\lambda \alpha +1 \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h e - ah - 1(| x1 - p| +| x2 - s) ((1 + \lambda ))h2)1+2\alpha \times \times \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| \bigr) - 2\alpha \bigl( | x1 - p| 2 + | x2 - s| 2 \bigr) \alpha h2\alpha h2. The change of variables x1 - p = mh and x2 - s = nh m, n = 0, 1, . . . yields I2 \leq M1\lambda \alpha +1 \sum m\in Z+ \sum n\in Z+ e - a(m+n) h2\alpha +2 ((1 + \lambda )h2)1+2\alpha \leq ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 1024 A. ASHYRALYEV, S. AKTURK \leq M2 \bigl( \lambda h2 \bigr) 1+\alpha ((1 + \lambda ))h2)1+2\alpha \leq M2 1 (\lambda h2)\alpha \leq M2 1 L\alpha \leq M3. (17) Thus, from estimates (14), (17) it follows that \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} (x1,x2)\in \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigm| \bigm| \lambda \alpha Ax h (A x h + \lambda ) - 1 fh(x1, x2) \bigm| \bigm| \leq M \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha h . (18) Combining estimates (16) and (18), we obtain estimate\bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| E\alpha (Ax h,C(\BbbR 2 h,+)) \leq M \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha h . Now, we will prove opposite estimate. Applying the triangle inequality and the definition of E\alpha - norm, we get \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1 + \tau , x2 + k) - fh(x1, x2) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \leq 2 \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| E\alpha (Ax h,C(\BbbR 2 h,+)) (19) for any (x1, x2) \in \BbbR 2 h,+ and \tau 2 + k2 \geq 1. Now, we will prove the estimate\bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1 + \tau , x2 + k) - fh(x1, x2) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \leq M \alpha (1 - \alpha ) \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| E\alpha (Ax h,C(\BbbR 2 h,+)) (20) for any (x1, x2) \in \BbbR 2 h,+ and \tau 2 + k2 < 1. For any positive operator A we can write v = \infty \int 0 A(\lambda +A) - 2v d\lambda . Noted that Ax h is a positive operator in the Banach space E\alpha \bigl( Ax h, C \bigl( \BbbR 2 h,+ \bigr) \bigr) . Hence, from this identity and formula (6) it follows that fh(x1, x2) = \infty \int 0 Ax h \bigl( \lambda +Ax h \bigr) - 2 fh(x1, x2) d\lambda = = \infty \int 0 \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda )A x h \bigl( \lambda +Ax h \bigr) - 1 fh(p, s)h2 d\lambda . Consequently, fh(x1 + \tau , x2 + k) - fh(x1, x2) = = \infty \int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigl[ Gh (x1 + \tau , x2 + k, p, s, \lambda ) - Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigr] \times \times \lambda \alpha Ah (Ah + \lambda ) - 1 fh(p, s)h2 d\lambda , ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 THE STRUCTURE OF FRACTIONAL SPACES GENERATED . . . 1025 whence \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1 + \tau , x2 + k) - fh(x1, x2) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \leq \leq \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| E\alpha (Ax h,C(\BbbR 2 h,+)) \infty \int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| Gh (x1 + \tau , x2 + k, p, s, \lambda ) - Gh (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha h2d\lambda . Let P = \infty \int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| Gh (x1 + \tau , x2 + k, p, s, \lambda ) - Gh (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha h2 d\lambda . Then \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1 + \tau , x2 + k) - fh(x1, x2) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \leq P \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| E\alpha (Ax h,C(\BbbR 2 h,+)). (21) To estimate P, we will consider two cases: | \lambda | \leq Lh - 2 and | \lambda | \geq Lh - 2, respectively. We denote that P = L1 + L2, where L1 = 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| Gh (x1 + \tau , x2 + k, p, s, \lambda ) - Gh (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha h2 d\lambda , L2 = \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| Gh (x1 + \tau , x2 + k, p, s, \lambda ) - Gh(x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha h2 d\lambda . We will estimate L1 and L2. Let us first assume that | \lambda | \leq Lh - 2. By Lemma 2 for p = q = 2 and using the triangle inequality, estimates (7), (8), we have, for some x\ast 1 between x1, x1 + \tau , and x\ast 2 between x2, x2 + k, L1 \leq M 1 (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \times \times 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \tau Gh x1 (x\ast 1, x \ast 2, p, s, \lambda ) + kGh x2 (x\ast 1, x \ast 2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| h2 d\lambda \leq \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| Gh x1 (x\ast 1, x \ast 2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| h2 d\lambda \leq \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h e - a(1+\lambda )1/2(| x\ast 1 - p| +| x\ast - s| ) h+ | x\ast 1 - p| + | x\ast 2 - s| h2 d\lambda \leq ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 1026 A. ASHYRALYEV, S. AKTURK \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \sum m\in \BbbR + h \sum n\in \BbbR + h \lambda - \alpha e - a(1+\lambda )1/2(mh+nh) mh+ nh h2 d\lambda \leq \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \left( \sum m\in Z+ e - 2a(1+\lambda )1/2mhh \right) 1/2\left( \sum n\in Z+ e - 2a(1+\lambda ) 1/2 nhh \right) 1/2 d\lambda \leq \leq M1 (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum m\in Z+ e - 2a(1+\lambda )1/2mhh d\lambda \leq \leq M2 (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \infty \int 0 e - 2a(1+\lambda )1/2xdx d\lambda \leq \leq M3 (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 1 \lambda \alpha 1 (1 + \lambda )1/2 d\lambda \leq M4 1 - 2\alpha , (22) L2 \leq M (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \lambda - \alpha e - a(1+\lambda )1/2(| x1 - p| +| x2 - s| )\times \times \biggl( 1 + \mathrm{l}\mathrm{n} \biggl\{ 1 + \Bigl( (1 + \lambda )1/2 \bigl( | x1 - p| + | x2 - s| + h \bigr) \Bigr) - 1 \biggr\} \biggr) h2d\lambda + + M (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \lambda - \alpha e - a(1+\lambda ))1/2(| x1+\tau - p| +| x2+k - s| )\times \times \biggl( 1 + \mathrm{l}\mathrm{n} \biggl\{ 1 + \Bigl( (1 + \lambda )1/2 \bigl( | x1 + \tau - p| + | x2 + k - s| + h \bigr) \Bigr) - 1 \biggr\} \biggr) h2d\lambda . The change of variables x1 - p = mh and x2 - s = nh, m, n = 0, 1, . . . , yields L2 \leq M (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \sum m\in Z+ \sum n\in Z+ \lambda - \alpha e - a(1+\lambda )1/2(m+n)h\times \times \biggl( 1 + \Bigl( (1 + \lambda )1/2 (mh+ nh+ h) \Bigr) - 1 \biggr) h2d\lambda \leq \leq M1 \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \infty \int 0 \infty \int 0 \lambda - \alpha e - a(1+\lambda )1/2(q+y) \biggl( 1 + \Bigl( (1 + \lambda )1/2 (q + y) \Bigr) - 1 \biggr) dq dy d\lambda \leq ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 THE STRUCTURE OF FRACTIONAL SPACES GENERATED . . . 1027 \leq M2 (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \left[ \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) 1 \lambda \alpha 1 1 + \lambda d\lambda + \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) 1 \lambda \alpha 1 (1 + \lambda ))1/2 \left( \infty \int 0 e - 2a(1+\lambda ))1/2qdq \right) d\lambda \right] \leq \leq M3 \alpha (1 - \alpha ) . (23) From estimates (22) and (23) it follows that P \leq M5 \alpha (1 - \alpha ) . (24) Second, let us | \lambda | \geq Lh - 2. By using the triangle inequality, estimates (9), (10), we have, for some x\ast 1 between x1, x1 + \tau , and x\ast 2 between x2, x2 + k, L1 \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| Gh x1 (x\ast 1, x \ast 2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| h2d\lambda \leq \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h e - ah - 1(| x\ast 1 - p| +| x\ast 2 - s| )h - 1 \bigl( 1 + (1 + \lambda )h2 \bigr) - 1 h2 d\lambda \leq \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha \sum m\in Z+ \sum n\in Z+ e - a(m+n) (1 + \lambda )h2 \lambda - 1/2 \lambda - 1/2 h - 1h2 d\lambda \leq \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha +1/2 1 + \lambda \sum m\in Z+ \sum n\in Z+ e - a(m+n) d\lambda \leq \leq M (\tau + k) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha 1/(\tau 2+k2)\int 0 \lambda - \alpha - 1/2d\lambda \leq M1 1 - 2\alpha , (25) L2 \leq 1 (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \lambda - \alpha \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h \bigm| \bigm| Gh (x1 + \tau , x2 + k, p, s, \lambda ) - Gh (x1, x2, p, s, \lambda ) \bigm| \bigm| (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha h2 d\lambda \leq \leq M (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h e - ah - 1 \bigl( | x1 - p| +| x2 - s| \bigr) h2(1 + \lambda ) h2 d\lambda + + M (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \sum p\in \BbbR + h \sum s\in \BbbR h e - ah - 1(| x1+\tau - p| +| x2+k - s| ) h2(1 + \lambda ) h2 d\lambda \leq ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 1028 A. ASHYRALYEV, S. AKTURK \leq M1 (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \sum m\in Z+ \sum n\in Z+ \lambda - \alpha (1 + \lambda ) e - a(m+n) d\lambda \leq \leq M2 (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \infty \int 1/(\tau 2+k2) \lambda - \alpha 1 + \lambda d\lambda \leq M1 \alpha (1 - \alpha ) . (26) By using estimates (25) and (26), we have P \leq M \alpha (1 - 2\alpha ) . (27) From estimates (21), (24) and (27) it follows estimate (20). Combining estimates (19) and (20), we get \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} (x1+\tau ,x2+k),(x1,x2)\in \BbbR 2 + (\tau ,h)\not =(0,0) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| fh(x1 + \tau , x2 + k) - fh(x1, x2) (\tau 2 + k2)\alpha \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \leq \leq M \alpha (1 - 2\alpha ) \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| E\alpha (Ax h,C(\BbbR 2 h,+)). This means that the following estimate holds:\bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha (\BbbR 2 h,+) \leq M \alpha (1 - 2\alpha ) \bigm\| \bigm\| fh\bigm\| \bigm\| E\alpha (Ax h,C(\BbbR 2 h,+)). Theorem 1 is proved. 4. Applications of Theorem 1. First, the boundary-value problem - \partial 2u(y, x) \partial y2 - a11(x) \partial 2u(y, x) \partial x21 - a22(x) \partial 2u(y, x) \partial x22 + \sigma u(y, x) = f(y, x), 0 < y < T, x \in \BbbR 2 +, u(0, x) = \varphi (x), u(T, x) = \psi (x), x \in \BbbR 2 +; u(y, 0, x2) = 0, 0 \leq y \leq T, x2 \in \BbbR , (28) for the elliptic equation is considered. Here a11(x), a22(x), \varphi (x), \psi (x), and f(y, x) are sufficiently smooth functions, and satisfy the uniform ellipticity (2) and \sigma > 0. The discretization of problem (28) is carried out in two steps. In the first step, let us use the discretization in x. To the differential operator Ax h generated by the problem (28), we assign the difference operator Ax h defined by formula (3). Theorem 2. For the solution of elliptic problem Ax hu h(x) = \Psi h(x), x \in \BbbR 2 h,+, uh(0, x2) = 0, x2 \in \BbbR h, (29) the following coercive inequality holds:\bigm\| \bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta x1 1+\Delta x1 1 - u hh - 2 \bigm\| \bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha (\BbbR 2 h,+) + \bigm\| \bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta x 1+\Delta x 1 - u hh - 2 \bigm\| \bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha (\BbbR 2 h,+) \leq M(\alpha )\| \Psi h\| C2\alpha (\BbbR 2 h,+), where M(\alpha ), 0 < \alpha < 1/2, does not depend on \Psi h. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 THE STRUCTURE OF FRACTIONAL SPACES GENERATED . . . 1029 The proof of Theorem 2 uses the techniques introduced in [22] (Chapter 5) and it is based on estimates (7) – (10). With the help of Ax h, we arrive at the boundary-value problem - d2uh(y, x) dy2 +Ax hu h(y, x) = fh(y, x), 0 < y < T, x \in \BbbR 2 h,+, uh(0, x) = \varphi (x), uh(T, x) = \psi (x), x \in \BbbR 2 h,+, (30) for the system of ordinary differential equations. In the second step, problem (30) is replaced by the second order of accuracy difference scheme in y, we get the following difference problem: - 1 \tau 2 \Bigl( uhk+1(x) - 2uhk(x) + uhk - 1(x) \Bigr) +Ax hu h k(x) = \varphi h k(x), \varphi h k(x) = fh(yk, x), yk = k\tau , 1 \leq k \leq N - 1, N\tau = T, x \in \BbbR 2 h,+, uh0(x) = \varphi h(x), uhN (x) = \psi h(x), x \in \BbbR 2 h,+, (31) for the approximate solution of problem (30). Theorem 3. For the solution of the difference problem (31) the following inequalities are valid: \mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x} 1\leq k\leq N - 1 \bigm\| \bigm\| \bigm\| \tau - 2 \bigl( uhk+1 - 2uhk + uhk - 1 \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha (\BbbR 2 h,+) + \mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x} 1\leq k\leq N - 1 \bigm\| \bigm\| uhk\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha +2(\BbbR 2 h,+) \leq \leq M(\alpha ) \biggl[ \mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x} 1\leq k\leq N - 1 \bigm\| \bigm\| \varphi h k \bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha (\BbbR 2 h,+) + \bigm\| \bigm\| \varphi h \bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha +2(\BbbR 2 h,+) + \bigm\| \bigm\| \psi h \bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha +2(\BbbR 2 h,+) \biggr] , where M(\alpha ) does not depend on \bigl\{ \varphi h k(x) \bigr\} N - 1 1 , \varphi h(x), \psi h(x), h and \tau . The proof of Theorem 3 is based on the Theorem 1 on the structure of the fractional spaces E\alpha (A x h, Ch) and on the positivity of the operator Ax h and on Theorem 2 coercive inequality on for the difference elliptic problem (29) and on the theorems on the structure of the fractional spaces E\prime \alpha = E\alpha \bigl( (Ax h) 1/2, Ch \bigr) of paper [22] and on the coercive inequalities in C\tau (E\alpha ) for the solution of the second order of accuracy difference scheme - 1 \tau 2 (uk+1 - 2uk + uk - 1) +Auk = fk, fk = f(tk), tk = k\tau , 1 \leq k \leq N - 1, N\tau = T, u0 = \varphi , uN = \psi , (32) for the approximate solution of the boundary-value problem - u\prime \prime (t) +Au(t) = f(t), 0 < t < T, u(0) = \varphi , u(T ) = \psi , (33) in a Banach space E with positive operator A. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 1030 A. ASHYRALYEV, S. AKTURK Second, the nonlocal boundary-value problem \partial 2u(y, x) \partial y2 - a11(x) \partial 2u(y, x) \partial x21 - a22(x) \partial 2u(y, x) \partial x22 + \sigma u(y, x) = f(y, x), 0 < y < T, x \in \BbbR 2 +, u(0, x) = u(T, x), uy(0, x) = uy(T, x), x \in \BbbR 2 +; u(y, 0, x2) = 0, 0 \leq y \leq T, x2 \in \BbbR , (34) for the elliptic equation is considered. The discretization of problem (34) is carried out in two steps. In the first step, let us use the discretization in (x1, x2). To the differential operator Ax h generated by the problem (34), we assign the difference operator Ax h defined by formula (3), too. With the help of Ax h, we arrive at the nonlocal boundary-value problem - d2uh(y, x) dy2 +Ax hu h(y, x) = fh(y, x), 0 < y < T, x \in \BbbR 2 +, uh(0, x) = uh(T, x), uhy(0, x) = uhy(T, x), x \in \BbbR 2 +, (35) for the system of ordinary differential equations. In the second step, problem (35) is replaced by the second order of accuracy difference scheme in y , we get the following difference problem: - 1 \tau 2 \bigl( uhk+1(x) - 2uhk(x) + uhk - 1(x) \bigr) +Ax hu h k(x) = \varphi h k(x), x \in \BbbR 2 h,+, \varphi h k(x) = fh(yk, x), yk = k\tau , 1 \leq k \leq N - 1, N\tau = T, x \in \BbbR 2 h,+, (36) uh0(x) = uhN (x), - uh2(x) + 4uh1(x) - 3uh0(x) = uhN - 2(x) - 4uhN - 1(x) + 3uhN (x), x \in \BbbR 2 h,+, for the approximate solution of problem (35). Theorem 4. For the solution of the difference problem (36) the following inequalities are valid: \mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x} 1\leq k\leq N - 1 \bigm\| \bigm\| \tau - 2 \bigl( uhk+1 - 2uhk + uhk - 1 \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha (\BbbR 2 h,+) + \mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x} 1\leq k\leq N - 1 \bigm\| \bigm\| uhk\bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha +2(\BbbR 2 h,+) \leq \leq M(\alpha ) \mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x} 1\leq k\leq N - 1 \bigm\| \bigm\| \varphi h k \bigm\| \bigm\| C2\alpha (\BbbR 2 h,+) , where M(\alpha ) does not depend on \bigl\{ \varphi h k(x) \bigr\} N - 1 1 , h and \tau . The proof of Theorem 4 is based on the Theorem 1 on the structure of the fractional spaces E\alpha (A x h, Ch) and on the positivity of the operator Ax h and on the theorem on the structure of the fractional spaces E\prime \alpha = E\alpha \bigl( (Ax h) 1/2, Ch \bigr) of paper [22] and on Theorem 2 coercive inequality on for the difference elliptic problem (29) and on the theorem on coercive inequalities in C\tau (E\alpha ) (see [22]) for the solution of the second order of accuracy difference scheme - 1 \tau 2 (uk+1 - 2uk + uk - 1) +Auk = fk, fk = f(tk), tk = k\tau , 1 \leq k \leq N - 1, N\tau = T, u0 = uN , - u2+4u1 - 3u0 = uN - 2 - 4uN - 1 + 3uN , ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 THE STRUCTURE OF FRACTIONAL SPACES GENERATED . . . 1031 for the approximate solution of the nonlocal boundary-value problem - u\prime \prime (t) +Au(t) = f(t), 0 < t < T, u(0) = u(T ), u\prime (0) = u\prime (T ), in a Banach space E with positive operator A. 5. Conclusion. Banach fixed-point theorem and methods of the present paper and [24] enable us to establish the existence and uniqueness results which hold under the some sufficient conditions on nonlinear term for the solution of second order of approximation difference schemes for the approximate solution of the following mixed problem: - \partial 2u(y, x) \partial y2 - a11(y, x) \partial 2u(y, x) \partial x21 - a22(y, x) \partial 2u(y, x) \partial x22 + \sigma u(y, x) = f(y, x, u, ux1 , ux2 , uy), 0 < y < T, x \in \BbbR 2 +, u(0, x) = \varphi (x), u(T, x) = \psi (x), x \in \BbbR 2 +; u(y, 0, x2) = 0, 0 < y < T, x2 \in \BbbR . 6. Acknowledgements. Some of the results of the present article were announced in the confer- ence proceeding [25] as extended abstract without proofs. The authors would like to thank Prof. Pavel Sobolevskii (Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brasil) for helpful suggestions to the improvement of our paper. The second author would also like to thank Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) for the financial support. The paper has been published under target program BR05236656 of the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. References 1. Fattorini H. O. Second order linear differential equations in Banach spaces // Math. Stud. – North-Holland, 1985. 2. Grisvard P. Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains. – London: Patman Adv. Publ. Program, 1984. 3. Krasnosel’skii M. A., Zabreiko P. P., Pustyl’nik E. I., Sobolevskii P. E. Integral operators in spaces of summable functions. – Leiden: Noordhoff, 1976. 4. Krein S. G. Linear differential equations in a Banach space // Transl. Math. Monographs. – Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc., 1968. 5. Skubachevskii A. L. Elliptic functional differential equations and applications. – Basel etc.: Birkhäuser, 1997. 6. Vlasov V. V., Rautian N. A. Spectral analysis of functional differential equations. – Moscow: MAKS Press, 2016. – 488 p. (in Russian). 7. Kalmenov T. S., Suragan D. Initial boundary-value problems for the wave equation // Electronic J. Different. Equat. – 2014. – 48. – P. 1 – 6. 8. Lunardi A. Analytic semigroups and optimal regularity in parabolic problems. – Basel etc.: Birkhäuser, 1995. 9. Solomyak M. Z. Estimation of norm of the resolvent of elliptic operator in spaces Lp // Uspechi Mat. Nauk. – 1960. – 15, № 6. – P. 141 – 148. 10. Stewart H. B. Generation of analytic semigroups by strongly elliptic operators under general boundary conditions // Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. – 1980. – 259. – P. 299 – 310. 11. Alibekov Kh. A., Sobolevskii P. E. Stability and convergence of difference schemes of a high order for parabolic differential equations // Ukr. Math. Zh. – 1979. – 31, № 6. – P. 627 – 634. 12. Danelich S. I. Fractional powers of positive difference operators: Dissertation. – Voronezh, 1989. 13. Simirnitskii Yu. A., Sobolevskii P. E. Positivity of multidimensional difference operators in the C -norm // Uspechi Mat. Nauk. – 1981. – 36, № 4. – P. 202 – 203. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8 1032 A. ASHYRALYEV, S. AKTURK 14. Ashyralyev A., Akturk S. Positivity of a one-dimensional difference operator in the half-line and its applications // Appl. and Comput. Math. – 2015. – 14, № 2. – P. 204 – 220. 15. Hardy G. H., Littlewood J. E., Pólya G. Inequalities. – Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988. 16. Ashyralyev A. A survey of results in the theory of fractional spaces generated by positive operators // TWMS J. Pure and Appl. Math. – 2015. – 6, № 2. – P. 129 – 157. 17. Triebel H. Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential operators. – Amsterdam; New York: North-Holland, 1978. 18. Ashyralyev A., Tetikoglu F. S. A note on fractional spaces generated by the positive operator with periodic conditions and applications // Boundary Value Problems. – 2015. – 31. 19. Ashyralyev A., Nalbant N., Sozen Y. Structure of fractional spaces generated by second order difference operators // J. Franklin Inst. – 2014. – 351, № 2. – P. 713 – 731. 20. Ashyralyev A., Akturk S. A note on positivity of two-dimensional differential operators // Filomat. – 2017. – 31, № 14. – P. 4651 – 4663. 21. Ashyralyev A., Akturk S., Sozen Y. The structure of fractional spaces generated by two-dimensional elliptic differential operator and its applications // Boundary Value Problems. – 2014. – 3. 22. Ashyralyev A., Sobolevskii P. E. New difference schemes for partial differential equations. – Basel etc.: Birkhäuser, 2004. 23. Ashyralyev A. On well-posedness of the nonlocal boundary-value problems for elliptic equations // Numer. Funct. Anal. and Optim. – 2003. – 24. – P. 1 – 15. 24. Shakhmurov V., Musaev H. Maximal regular convolution-differential equations in weighted Besov spaces // Appl. and Comput. Math. – 2017. – 16, № 2. – P. 190 – 200. 25. Akturk S., Sozen Y. The structure of fractional spaces generated by the difference operator on the half plane // AIP Conf. Proc. – 2012. – 1479. – P. 611 – 614. Received 18.05.15, after revision — 02.02.18 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2018, т. 70, № 8
id umjimathkievua-article-1614
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:09:12Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/8a/4407088da1844ee25b51e98ca33d5c8a.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-16142019-12-05T09:21:04Z The structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane Структура дробових просторiв, породжених двовимiрним диференцiальним оператором на пiвплощинi Akturk, S. Ashyralyev, A. Актюрк, С. Аширалієв, A. We consider a difference operator approximation $A^x_h$ of the differential operator $A^xu(x) = a_{11}(x)u_{x_1 x_1}(x) - a_{22}(x)u_{x_2x_2} (x) + \sigma u(x),\; x = (x_1, x_2)$ defined in the region $R^{+} \times R$ with the boundary condition $u(0, x_2) = 0,\; x_2 \in R$. Here, the coefficients $a_{ii}(x), i = 1, 2$, are continuously differentiable, satisfy the uniform ellipticity condition $a^2_{11}(x) + a^2_{22}(x) \geq \delta &gt; 0$. We investigate the structure of the fractional spaces generated by the analyzed difference operator. Theorems on well-posedness in a Holder space of difference elliptic problems are obtained as applications. Розглянуто апроксимацiю рiзницевими операторами $A^x_h$ диференцiального оператора $A^xu(x) = a_{11}(x)u_{x_1 x_1}(x) - a_{22}(x)u_{x_2x_2} (x) + \sigma u(x),\; x = (x_1, x_2)$, що визначений у областi $R^{+} \times R$, з граничною умовою $u(0, x_2) = 0,\; x_2 \in R$. У даному випадку коефiцiєнти $a_{ii}(x), i = 1, 2$, є неперервно диференцiйовними та задовольняють рiвномiрну умову елiптичностi $a^2_{11}(x) + a^2_{22}(x) \geq \delta &gt; 0$ i, крiм того, $\sigma &gt; 0$. Теореми про коректнiсть рiзницевих елiптичних задач у просторах Гьольдера одержанi як застосування. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2018-08-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/1614 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 70 No. 8 (2018); 1019-1032 Український математичний журнал; Том 70 № 8 (2018); 1019-1032 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/1614/596 Copyright (c) 2018 Akturk S.; Ashyralyev A.
spellingShingle Akturk, S.
Ashyralyev, A.
Актюрк, С.
Аширалієв, A.
The structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane
title The structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane
title_alt Структура дробових просторiв, породжених двовимiрним диференцiальним оператором на пiвплощинi
title_full The structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane
title_fullStr The structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane
title_full_unstemmed The structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane
title_short The structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane
title_sort structure of fractional spaces generated by the two-dimensional difference operator on the half plane
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/1614
work_keys_str_mv AT akturks thestructureoffractionalspacesgeneratedbythetwodimensionaldifferenceoperatoronthehalfplane
AT ashyralyeva thestructureoffractionalspacesgeneratedbythetwodimensionaldifferenceoperatoronthehalfplane
AT aktûrks thestructureoffractionalspacesgeneratedbythetwodimensionaldifferenceoperatoronthehalfplane
AT aširalíêva thestructureoffractionalspacesgeneratedbythetwodimensionaldifferenceoperatoronthehalfplane
AT akturks strukturadrobovihprostorivporodženihdvovimirnimdiferencialʹnimoperatoromnapivploŝini
AT ashyralyeva strukturadrobovihprostorivporodženihdvovimirnimdiferencialʹnimoperatoromnapivploŝini
AT aktûrks strukturadrobovihprostorivporodženihdvovimirnimdiferencialʹnimoperatoromnapivploŝini
AT aširalíêva strukturadrobovihprostorivporodženihdvovimirnimdiferencialʹnimoperatoromnapivploŝini
AT akturks structureoffractionalspacesgeneratedbythetwodimensionaldifferenceoperatoronthehalfplane
AT ashyralyeva structureoffractionalspacesgeneratedbythetwodimensionaldifferenceoperatoronthehalfplane
AT aktûrks structureoffractionalspacesgeneratedbythetwodimensionaldifferenceoperatoronthehalfplane
AT aširalíêva structureoffractionalspacesgeneratedbythetwodimensionaldifferenceoperatoronthehalfplane