Weakly SS-Quasinormal Minimal Subgroups and the Nilpotency of a Finite Group

A subgroup H is said to be an s-permutable subgroup of a finite group G provided that the equality HP =PH holds for every Sylow subgroup P of G. Moreover, H is called SS-quasinormal in G if there exists a supplement B of H to G such that H permutes with every Sylow subgroup of B. We show that H is w...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2014
Автори: Zhang, Xirong, Zhao, Tao, Чжан, Хіронг, Чжао, Тао
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Українська
Англійська
Опубліковано: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2014
Онлайн доступ:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2122
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860508055520673792
author Zhang, Xirong
Zhao, Tao
Чжан, Хіронг
Чжао, Тао
author_facet Zhang, Xirong
Zhao, Tao
Чжан, Хіронг
Чжао, Тао
author_sort Zhang, Xirong
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2019-12-05T10:24:43Z
description A subgroup H is said to be an s-permutable subgroup of a finite group G provided that the equality HP =PH holds for every Sylow subgroup P of G. Moreover, H is called SS-quasinormal in G if there exists a supplement B of H to G such that H permutes with every Sylow subgroup of B. We show that H is weakly SS-quasinormal in G if there exists a normal subgroup T of G such that HT is s-permutable and H \ T is SS-quasinormal in G. We study the influence of some weakly SS-quasinormal minimal subgroups on the nilpotency of a finite group G. Numerous results known from the literature are unified and generalized.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:19:07Z
format Article
fulltext UDC 512.5 T. Zhao (School Sci., Shandong Univ. Technology, China), X. Zhang (School Math. Sci., Huaiyin Normal Univ., Jiangsu, China) WEAKLY SS-QUASINORMAL MINIMAL SUBGROUPS AND THE NILPOTENCY OF A FINITE GROUP* СЛАБКО SS-КВАЗIНОРМАЛЬНI МIНIМАЛЬНI ПIДГРУПИ ТА НIЛЬПОТЕНТНIСТЬ СКIНЧЕННОЇ ГРУПИ A subgroup H is said to be an s-permutable subgroup of a finite group G provided that HP = PH holds for every Sylow subgroup P of G, and H is said to be SS-quasinormal in G if there is a supplement B of H to G such that H permutes with every Sylow subgroup of B. We show that H is weakly SS-quasinormal in G if there exists a normal subgroup T of G such that HT is s-permutable and H ∩ T is SS-quasinormal in G. We investigate the influence of some weakly SS-quasinormal minimal subgroups on the nilpotency of a finite group G. Numerous results known from the literature are unified and generalized. Пiдгрупа H називається s-переставною пiдгрупою скiнченної групи G за умови, що HP = PH виконується для кожної силовської пiдгрупи P групи G; H називається SS-квазiнормальною в G, якщо iснує доповнення B пiдгрупи H до G таке, що H можна переставити з кожною силовською пiдгрупою B. Показано, що H є слабко SS-квазiнормальною в G, якщо iснує нормальна пiдгрупа T групи G така, що HT є s-переставною, а H ∩ T є SS-квазiнормальною в G. Дослiджено вплив деяких слабко SS-квазiнормальних мiнiмальних пiдгруп на нiльпотентнiсть скiнченної групиG. Велику кiлькiсть вiдомих з лiтератури результатiв упорядковано та узагальнено. 1. Introduction. All groups considered in this paper will be finite and we use conventional notions and notation, as in D. Gorenstein [7]. We use F to denote a formation, N and Np denote the classes of all nilpotent groups and p-nilpotent groups, respectively. GF is the F-residual of G, that is, GF = ∩{N �G ∣∣G/N ∈ F}. A normal subgroup N is said to be F-hypercentral in G, provided that N has a chain of subgroups 1 = N0 �N1 � . . .�Nr = N such that each Ni+1/Ni is an F-central chief factor of G. The product of all F-hypercentral subgroups of G is again an F-hypercentral subgroup of G, it is denoted by ZF (G) and called the F-hypercenter of G. For the formation N , we use the notation ZN (G) = Z∞(G), which is the hypercenter of G. In the study of group theory, from the generalized normalities of some primary subgroups to investigate the structures of a finite group is a common method. Recently, many new generalized normal subgroups were introduced successively. Following Kegel [12], a subgroup H is said to be s-permutable in G, if H is permutable with every Sylow subgroup P of G. As a development, in [13] the authors introduced that: a subgroup H is called an SS-quasinormal subgroup of G if there is a supplement B of H to G such that H permutes with every Sylow subgroup of B. Recently, in [8] Guo et al. introduced that: a subgroup H is said to be S-embedded in G if there exists a normal subgroup N such that HN is s-permutable in G and H ∩ N ≤ HsG, where HsG is the largest s- permutable subgroup of G contained H . This concept integrated both the s-permutability and another related concept called c-normal subgroup, introduced by Wang in [18] and investigated extensively by many scholars. By assuming that some primary subgroups of G satisfying the s-permutability, SS-quasinormality or S-embedded properties, many interesting results have been derived (see, for example, [1, 8, 9, 13, 14, 16]). * This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant N. 11171243). c© T. ZHAO, X. ZHANG, 2014 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2014, т. 66, № 2 187 188 T. ZHAO, X. ZHANG In order to unify and generalize the related results, in this paper, we introduce a new kind of generalized normal subgroup which can generalize both the SS-quasinormality and the S-embedded property (and so it contains the s-permutability and c-normality) properly. Definition 1.1. Let H be a subgroup of a finite group G, then H is said to be weakly SS-quasi- normal in G, if there exists a normal subgroup T of G such that HT is s-permutable and H ∩ T is SS-quasinormal in G. Remark 1.1. From the definition, it is easy to see that every S-embedded subgroup and SS- quasinormal subgroup of G is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. In general, a weakly SS-quasinormal subgroup of G need not to be S-embedded or SS-quasinormal in G. For instance, we let G = S5 be the symmetric group of degree 5. Example 1.1. Let H = S4 and P ∈ Syl5(G). Since HP = PH = G, H is SS-quasinormal and thus weakly SS-quasinormal in G. Since the only nontrivial normal subgroups of G are A5 and G, but neither H nor H ∩A5 = A4 is s-permutable in G, H is not S-embedded in G. Example 1.2. Let K = 〈(12)〉 and T = A5. Since T � G is a complement of K, K is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. Since the only supplement of K to G are A5 and G itself, but K〈(12345)〉 6= 6= 〈(12345)〉K, K is not SS-quasinormal in G. From some minimal subgroup’s normalities to characterize the structure of a finite group is an active topic in the group theory. A number of meaningful results have been obtained under the assumption that some minimal subgroups of G are well located. For example, Buckley [3] and Itô (see [11], III, 5.3) have got some well-known results about the supersolublity and nilpotency of a finite group, respectively. Since then, a series of papers have dealt with generalizations of the results of Itô and Buckley by using the theory of formations and some generalized normal subgroups (see, for example, [1, 2, 4, 10, 16]). In this paper, we investigate the influence of some weakly SS-qu- asinormal minimal subgroups on the structures of a finite group G. Some new results about the nilpotency of G are obtained, we also generalized some known ones. 2. Preliminaries. In this section, we list some basic results which will be useful in the sequel. Lemma 2.1. Let H be an s-permutable subgroup of G. (1) If K ≤ G, then H ∩K is s-permutable in K. (2) If N �G, then HN/N is s-permutable in G/N . (3) If H is a p-subgroup of G for some prime p, then NG(H) ≥ Op(G). Proof. The proof of the statements can be seen in [12] and [5]. Lemma 2.2 ([13], Lemma 2.1) . Suppose that H is SS-quasinormal in a group G. (1) If H ≤ K ≤ G, then H is SS-quasinormal in K. (2) If N �G, then HN/N is SS-quasinormal in G/N . Lemma 2.3 ([13], Lemma 2.2) . Let P be a p-subgroup of G, p a prime. Then P is s-permutable in G if and only if P ≤ Op(G) and P is SS-quasinormal in G. Now, we can prove that: Lemma 2.4. Suppose that H is weakly SS-quasinormal in a group G, N �G. (1) If H ≤ K ≤ G, then H is weakly SS-quasinormal in K. (2) If N ≤ H, then H/N is weakly SS-quasinormal in G/N. (3) Let π be a set of primes, H a π-subgroup and N a normal π′-subgroup of G. Then HN/N is weakly SS-quasinormal in G/N. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2014, т. 66, № 2 WEAKLY SS-QUASINORMAL MINIMAL SUBGROUPS AND THE NILPOTENCY OF A FINITE GROUP 189 (4) If H ≤ K � G, then G has a normal subgroup L contained in K such that HL is s- permutable and H ∩ L is SS-quasinormal in G. Proof. The statements (1), (2) and (4) can be deduced directly by Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2. Now we prove the statement (3). By hypotheses, there exists a normal subgroup T of G such that HT is s-permutable and H ∩ T is SS-quasinormal in G. It is easy to see that TN/N � G/N, by Lemma 2.1(2) we know (HN/N)(TN/N) = HTN/N is s-permutable in G/N . Since H is a π-group and N a π′-group, |H ∩ TN | = |H| · |TN |π |HTN |π = |H| · |T |π |HT |π = |H ∩ T |. This implies that H ∩ TN = H ∩ T . Hence (HN/N) ∩ (TN/N) = (HN ∩ TN)/N = (H ∩ ∩ TN)N/N = (H ∩ T )N/N, which is SS-quasinormal in G/N by Lemma 2.2(2). Thus HN/N is weakly SS-quasinormal in G/N, as required. Lemma 2.4 is proved. The following results is well known, one can see [21] (Lemma 2.2) for example. Lemma 2.5. Let G be a group and p a prime divisor of |G| with (|G|, p− 1) = 1. (1) If N is normal in G of order p, then N lies in Z(G). (2) If G has cyclic Sylow p-subgroups, then G is p-nilpotent. (3) If M is a subgroup of G with index p, then M is normal in G. Lemma 2.6. Let F be a saturated formation containing the classes of all nilpotent groups N , H a normal subgroup of G. If G/H ∈ F and H ≤ Z(G), then G ∈ F . Proof. Let f and F be the canonical definitions of N and F , respectively. Pick an chief factor M/N of G contained in H, then M/N is a p-group for some prime p. Since M ≤ H ≤ Z(G), M/N ≤ Z(G/N). Thus G/CG(M/N) = 1 ∈ f(p). Since N ⊆ F , f(p) ⊆ F (p) by [6] (IV, Proposition 3.11). It follows that G/CG(M/N) ∈ F (p). The arbitrary choice of M/N implies that there exists a normal chain of G contained in H such that every G-chief factor is F-central. Since G/H ∈ F , it follows that G ∈ F . Lemma 2.7 ([16], Lemma 2.8) . Suppose that P is a normal p-subgroup of G contained in Z∞(G), then CG(P ) ≥ Op(G). Lemma 2.8 ([11], X. 13) . Let F ∗(G) be the generalized Fitting subgroup of G. (1) If M is a normal subgroup of G, then F ∗(M) ≤ F ∗(G). (2) F ∗(G) 6= 1, if G 6= 1; in fact, F ∗(G)/F (G) = Soc(F (G)CG(F (G))/F (G)). (3) F ∗(F ∗(G)) = F ∗(G) ≥ F (G); if F ∗(G) is soluble, then F ∗(G) = F (G). (4) If K ≤ Z(G), then F ∗(G/K) = F ∗(G)/K. 3. Main results. Theorem 3.1. Suppose that p is a prime divisor of a groupG with (|G|, p−1) = 1, P ∈ Sylp(G). If every cyclic subgroup of P ∩GNp with prime order or order 4 (if p = 2 and P is non-abelian) not having a p-nilpotent supplement in G is weakly SS-quasinormal in G, then G is a p-nilpotent group. Proof. Suppose that the result is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then we have (1) Every proper subgroup of G is p-nilpotent, GNp = P is not a cyclic group. LetM be a proper subgroup of G. SinceM/(M∩GNp) ∼= MGNp/GNp ≤ G/GNp is p-nilpotent, MNp ≤ M ∩ GNp . Now, let Mp be a Sylow p-subgroup of M . Without loss of generality, we may assume that Mp ≤ P and so Mp∩MNp ≤ P ∩GNp . By Lemma 2.4, we know every cyclic subgroup of Mp ∩MNp with prime order or order 4 (if p = 2 and Mp is non-abelian) not having a p-nilpotent supplement in M is weakly SS-quasinormal in M . Thus M satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2014, т. 66, № 2 190 T. ZHAO, X. ZHANG The minimal choice of G implies that M is p-nilpotent and so G is a minimal non-p-nilpotent group. By [11] (IV, Theorem 5.4), G has a normal Sylow p-subgroup P and a non-normal cyclic Sylow q-subgroup Q such that G = PQ; P/Φ(P ) is a minimal normal subgroup of G/Φ(P ). Moreover, P is of exponent p if p > 2 and exponent at most 4 if p = 2. On the other hand, the minimal choice of G implies that GNp = P . By Lemma 2.5, we may also assume that P is not cyclic. (2) Some minimal subgroup X/Φ(P ) of P/Φ(P ) is not s-permutable in G/Φ(P ). If every minimal subgroup of P/Φ(P ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(P ), then by [17] (Lemma 2.11) we know P/Φ(P ) has a maximal subgroup which is normal in G/Φ(P ). Since P/Φ(P ) is a chief factor of G, |P/Φ(P )| = p and so P is cyclic, this contradicts with (1). Thus there exists some minimal subgroup X/Φ(P ) of P/Φ(P ) such that X/Φ(P ) is not s-permutable in G/Φ(P ). (3) 〈x〉 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G for any x ∈ X\Φ(P ). Let x ∈ X\Φ(P ), then by (1) we know 〈x〉 is a cyclic group of order p or 4. Let T be any supplement of 〈x〉 in G, then G = 〈x〉T and P = P ∩〈x〉T = 〈x〉(P ∩T ). Since P/Φ(P ) is abelian, (P ∩T )Φ(P )/Φ(P )�G/Φ(P ) and hence (P ∩T )Φ(P )�G. Thus P ∩T ≤ Φ(P ) or P ∩T = P, as P/Φ(P ) is a chief factor of G. If P ∩ T ≤ Φ(P ) for some supplement T of 〈x〉 in G, then P = 〈x〉 is cyclic, this contradicts with (1). Now assume that P ∩ T = P for any supplement T . Then T = G is the unique supplement of 〈x〉 in G. Since G is not p-nilpotent, 〈x〉 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G by the hypotheses. (4) The final contradiction. By (3) and Lemma 2.4(4), there exists a normal subgroup K of G contained in P such that 〈x〉K is s-permutable and 〈x〉 ∩ K is SS-quasinormal in G. Since 〈x〉 ∩ K ≤ P = Op(G), 〈x〉 ∩ K is s-permutable in G by Lemma 2.3. Since P/Φ(P ) is a chief factor of G, K ≤ Φ(P ) or K = P . If K ≤ Φ(P ), then X/Φ(P ) = 〈x〉KΦ(P )/Φ(P ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(P ), a contradiction. If K = P, then 〈x〉 = 〈x〉∩K is s-permutable in G and so X/Φ(P ) = 〈x〉Φ(P )/Φ(P ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(P ), a contradiction too. Theorem 3.1 is proved. Next, by assuming that some minimal subgroups lie in the hypercenter of G and some cyclic subgroups of order 4 having the weakly SS-quasinormal properties, we give out some criteria about the nilpotency of a group G. Theorem 3.2. Let E be a normal subgroup of G such that G/E is nilpotent. If every minimal subgroup of E is contained in Z∞(G) and every cyclic subgroup of E with order 4 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G or also lies in Z∞(G), then G is nilpotent. Proof. Suppose that the result is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then we have (1) Every proper subgroup of G is nilpotent. Let K be an arbitrary proper subgroup of G. Since G/E is nilpotent, K/K ∩ E ∼= KE/E is nilpotent. Let H be a minimal subgroup of K ∩E, then H ≤ Z∞(G)∩K ≤ Z∞(K). For any cyclic subgroup U of K∩E of order 4, by hypotheses U is weakly SS-quasinormal in G or lies in Z∞(G). Then by Lemma 2.4, U is weakly SS-quasinormal in K or lies in Z∞(G) ∩ K ≤ Z∞(K). Thus (K,K∩E) satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem in any case. The minimal choice of G implies that K is nilpotent, thus G is a minimal non-nilpotent group. By [11] (II, Theorem 5.2), we can deduce that G = PQ, where P is a normal Sylow p-subgroup and Q a non-normal cyclic Sylow q-subgroup of G; P/Φ(P ) is a chief factor of G; exp(P ) = p or 4. (2) p = 2, exp(P ) = 4 and every cyclic subgroup of P ≤ E with order 4 is weakly SS-quasi- normal in G. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2014, т. 66, № 2 WEAKLY SS-QUASINORMAL MINIMAL SUBGROUPS AND THE NILPOTENCY OF A FINITE GROUP 191 Since G/E is nilpotent and G/P ∩ E . G/P × G/E, G/P ∩ E is nilpotent. If P � E, then P ∩E < P and Q(P ∩E) < G. Thus Q(P ∩E) is nilpotent by (1), then Q(P ∩E) = Q× (P ∩E) and Q charQ(P ∩E). On the other hand, G/P ∩E = P/P ∩E×Q(P ∩E)/P ∩E, it follows that Q(P ∩E)/P ∩E�G/P ∩E and Q(P ∩E)�G. Therefore, Q�G and G = P ×Q, a contradiction. Thus we have P ≤ E. Since P is a normal Sylow p-subgroup of G, all elements of order p or 4 (if p = 2) of G are contained in P and so contained in E. If p > 2 or p = 2 and every cyclic subgroup of P with order 4 lies in Z∞(G), then by (1) and hypotheses, P ≤ Z∞(G). Therefore, Lemma 2.7 implies that G = PQ = P ×Q is nilpotent, a contradiction. Thus by hypotheses, we know that (2) holds. (3) Every x ∈ P\Φ(P ) is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. If there exists some x ∈ P\Φ(P ) such that o(x) = 2, we denote M = 〈x〉G ≤ P, then MΦ(P )/Φ(P )�G/Φ(P ). Since P/Φ(P ) is a minimal normal subgroup ofG/Φ(P ) andM * Φ(P ), P = MΦ(P ) = M ≤ Z∞(G). Therefore, Lemma 2.7 implies that G = PQ = P ×Q is nilpotent, a contradiction. Thus every x ∈ P\Φ(P ) is of order 4. By (2), we know 〈x〉 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. (4) Some minimal subgroup of P/Φ(P ) is not s-permutable in G/Φ(P ). If every minimal subgroup of P/Φ(P ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(P ), then by [17] (Lemma 2.11) we know P/Φ(P ) has a maximal subgroup which is normal in G/Φ(P ). Since P/Φ(P ) is a chief factor of G, |P/Φ(P )| = p. Since exp(P ) = 4, P is a cyclic group of order 4. Then Lemma 2.5 implies that Q�G and so G is nilpotent, a contradiction. Thus some minimal subgroup X/Φ(P ) of P/Φ(P ) is not s-permutable in G/Φ(P ). (5) The final contradiction. Let x ∈ X\Φ(P ), then by (3) we know that x is of order 4 and 〈x〉 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. Thus there exists a normal subgroup K of G contained in P such that 〈x〉K is s-permutable and 〈x〉 ∩K is SS-quasinormal in G. Since 〈x〉 ∩K ≤ P = Op(G), by Lemma 2.3 we know 〈x〉 ∩K is s-permutable in G. Since P/Φ(P ) is a chief factor of G, K ≤ Φ(P ) or K = P . If K ≤ Φ(P ), then X/Φ(P ) = 〈x〉KΦ(P )/Φ(P ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(P ), a contradiction. If K = P, then 〈x〉 = 〈x〉∩K is s-permutable in G and so X/Φ(P ) = 〈x〉Φ(P )/Φ(P ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(P ), a contradiction too. Theorem 3.2 is proved. Now, we can prove that: Theorem 3.3. Let F be a saturated formation containing N . If every minimal subgroup of GF lies in the F-hypercenter ZF (G) of G, then G ∈ F if and only if every cyclic subgroup of GF with order 4 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. Proof. The necessity is obvious, we need to prove only the sufficiency. Let 〈x〉 be a minimal subgroup of GF , then 〈x〉 ≤ ZF (G)∩GF which is contained in Z(GF ) by [6] (IV, 6.10). From Lemma 2.4, we know that every cyclic subgroup of GF with order 4 is weakly SS-quasinormal in GF . Theorem 3.2 implies that GF is nilpotent and so it is soluble. If GF ≤ Φ(G), then G/Φ(G) ∈ F , hence G ∈ F . Thus we may assume that there exists a maximal subgroup M of G such that G = MGF = MF (G). By [6] (IV, 1.17), we know MF ≤ GF . Hence every minimal subgroup of MF is contained in ZF (G) ∩M ≤ ZF (M). By Lemma 2.4, every cyclic subgroup of MF with order 4 is SS-quasinormal in M . Therefore, M satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem. Then M ∈ F by induction. From [1] (Theorem 1 and Proposition 1), we know GF is a p-group for some prime p ; GF/Φ(GF ) is a minimal normal subgroup of G/Φ(GF ); GF has exponent p if p > 2 and exponent at most 4 if p = 2. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2014, т. 66, № 2 192 T. ZHAO, X. ZHANG If exp(GF ) = p, then GF = Ω1(G F ) ≤ ZF (G) by the hypotheses, this would imply that G ∈ F . Thus we may assume that p = 2 and exp(GF ) = 4. If there exists some x ∈ GF\Φ(GF ) such that o(x) = 2, denote H = 〈x〉G, then H � G and H ≤ Ω1(G F ) ≤ ZF (G). On the other hand, GF = HΦ(GF ) = H as GF/Φ(GF ) is a minimal normal subgroup of G/Φ(GF ). In this case, G ∈ F . Next we assume that every x ∈ GF\Φ(GF ) is of order 4, and so by hypotheses 〈x〉 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. Let X/Φ(GF ) be an arbitrary minimal subgroup of GF/Φ(GF ) and x ∈ X\Φ(GF ). Then there exists a normal subgroup K of G contained in GF such that 〈x〉K is s-permutable and 〈x〉 ∩K is SS-quasinormal in G. Since 〈x〉 ∩K ≤ GF ≤ O2(G), 〈x〉 ∩K is s- permutable in G by Lemma 2.3. Since GF/Φ(GF ) is a chief factor of G, K ≤ Φ(GF ) or K = GF . If K ≤ Φ(GF ), then X/Φ(GF ) = 〈x〉KΦ(GF )/Φ(GF ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(GF ). If K = GF , then 〈x〉 = 〈x〉∩K is s-permutable in G and we also deduce that X/Φ(GF ) = 〈x〉Φ(GF )/Φ(GF ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(GF ). This means that every minimal subgroup of GF/Φ(GF ) is s-permutable in G/Φ(GF ). Then by [17] (Lemma 2.11) we know GF/Φ(GF ) has a maximal subgroup which is normal in G/Φ(GF ). Since GF/Φ(GF ) is a chief factor of G, |GF/Φ(GF )| = 2. By Lemma 2.5, we know GF/Φ(GF ) ≤ Z(G/Φ(GF )). Since (G/Φ(GF ))/(GF/Φ(GF )) ∼= G/GF ∈ F , Lemma 2.6 implies that G/Φ(GF ) ∈ F . Since Φ(GF ) ≤ Φ(G) and F is an saturated formation, G ∈ F , as desired. Theorem 3.3 is proved. Theorem 3.4. A group G is nilpotent if and only if every minimal subgroup of F ∗(GN ) lies in Z∞(G) and every cyclic subgroup of F ∗(GN ) with order 4 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. Proof. The necessity is obvious, we need to prove only the sufficiency. Suppose that the result is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then (1) Every proper normal subgroup of G is nilpotent. Let M be a proper normal subgroup of G. Since M/(M ∩ GN ) ∼= MGN /GN ≤ G/GN is nilpotent and MN �M ∩GN �GN , Lemma 2.8 implies that F ∗(MN ) ≤ F ∗(M ∩GN ) ≤ F ∗(GN ). Moreover, M ∩ Z∞(G) ≤ Z∞(M). Now we can see easily that M satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem. The minimal choice of G implies that M is nilpotent. (2) F (G) is the unique maximal normal subgroup of G. Let M be a maximal normal subgroup of G, then M is nilpotent by (1). Since the classes of all nilpotent groups formed a Fitting class, the nilpotency of M implies that M = F (G) is the unique maximal normal subgroup of G. (3) GN = G = G ′ and F ∗(G) = F (G) < G. If GN < G, then GN is nilpotent by (1). Thus, F ∗(GN ) = GN by Lemma 2.8. Now Theorem 3.2 implies immediately that G is nilpotent, a contradiction. Hence, we must have GN = G. Since GN ≤ G′, it follows that G′ = G. Hence G/F (G) cannot be cyclic of prime order. Thus G/F (G) is a non-abelian simple group. If F (G) < F ∗(G), then F ∗(GN ) = F ∗(G) = G by (2). Again by Theorem 3.2, we can deduce that G is nilpotent, which is a contradiction. (4) The final contradiction. Since F (G) = F ∗(G) 6= 1, we may choose the smallest prime divisor p of |F (G)| such that Op(G) 6= 1. Then for any Sylow q-subgroup Q of G (q 6= p), we consider the subgroup G0 = = Op(G)Q. It is clear that GN0 ≤ Op(G) and G0 ∩ Z∞(G) ≤ Z∞(G0). Hence, every minimal subgroup of GN0 lies in Z∞(G0) and every cyclic subgroup of GN0 with order 4 is weakly SS- quasinormal in G0. By Theorem 3.2, we know G0 is nilpotent. Hence, G0 = Op(G) × Q and Q ≤ CG(Op(G)). Consequently, G/CG(Op(G)) is a p-group. Thus we have CG(Op(G)) = G by (3), namely Op(G) ≤ Z(G). Now we consider the factor group G = G/Op(G). First we have F ∗(G) = ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2014, т. 66, № 2 WEAKLY SS-QUASINORMAL MINIMAL SUBGROUPS AND THE NILPOTENCY OF A FINITE GROUP 193 = F ∗(G)/Op(G) by Lemma 2.8(4). Besides that, for any element x of odd prime order in F ∗(G), since Op(G) is the Sylow p-subgroup of F ∗(G), x can be viewed as the image of an element x of odd prime order in F ∗(G). It follows that x lies in Z∞(G) and x lies in Z∞(G), as Z∞(G/Op(G)) = = Z∞(G)/Op(G). This shows that G satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem. By the minimal choice of G, we can conclude that G is nilpotent and so is G. Theorem 3.4 is proved. Now, we can get a more precise result: Theorem 3.5. Let F be a saturated formation containing N . Then G ∈ F if and only if every minimal subgroup of F ∗(GF ) lies in ZF (G) and every cyclic subgroup of F ∗(GF ) with order 4 is weakly SS-quasinormal in G. Proof. Only the sufficiency needs to be verified. By [6] (IV, 6.10), GF ∩ ZF (G) ≤ Z(GF ) ≤ ≤ Z∞(GF ). Consequently, every minimal subgroup of F ∗(GF ) is contained in Z∞(GF ). By the hy- potheses and Lemma 2.4, every cyclic subgroup of F ∗(GF ) with order 4 is weakly SS-quasinormal in GF . By Theorem 3.4, we see that GF is nilpotent and so F ∗(GF ) = GF . Now by Theorem 3.3, we can deduce that G ∈ F , as required. Theorem 3.5 is proved. 4. Applications. Since all normal, quasinormal, s-permutable, c-normal, SS-quasinormal, nearly s-normal [19] and S-embedded subgroups of G are weakly SS-quasinormal in G, our results have many meaningful corollaries. Here, we list some of them. Corollary 4.1 (see [20]) . G is 2-nilpotent if every cyclic subgroup of G with order 2 or order 4 is c-normal in G. Corollary 4.2. Let p be a prime divisor of G with (|G|, p − 1) = 1, P ∈ Sylp(G). If every cyclic subgroup of P ∩GNp with prime order or order 4 (if p = 2 and P is non-abelian) not having a p-nilpotent supplement in G is SS-quasinormal (nearly s-normal, S-embedded) in G, then G is a p-nilpotent group. Corollary 4.3 (see [2]) . Let F be a saturated formation such that N ⊆ F . Let G be a group such that every element of GF of order 4 is c-normal in G. Then G belongs to F if and only if 〈x〉 lies in the F-hypercenter ZF (G) of G for every element x ∈ GF of order 2. Corollary 4.4 (see [15]) . Let F be a saturated formation containing N and let G be a group. Then G ∈ F if and only if GF is solvable and every element of order 4 of F (GF ) is c-normal in G and x lies in the F-hypercenter ZF (G) of G for every element x of prime order of F (GF ). Corollary 4.5 (see [16]) . Suppose N is a normal subgroup of a group G such that G/N is nilpotent. Suppose every minimal subgroup of N is contained in Z∞(G), every cyclic subgroup of order 4 of N is s-permutable in G or lies also in Z∞(G), then G is nilpotent. Corollary 4.6 (see [14]) . Let F be a saturated formation such that N ⊆ F , and let G be a group. Every cyclic subgroup of order 4 of GF (or F ∗(GF )) is SS-quasinormal in G. Then G belongs to F if and only if every subgroup of prime order of GF (or F ∗(GF )) lies in the F- hypercenter ZF (G) of G. Corollary 4.7. Let F be a saturated formation containing N . Then G ∈ F if and only if every minimal subgroup of F ∗(GF ) lies in ZF (G) and every cyclic subgroup of F ∗(GF ) with order 4 is nearly s-normal or S-embedded in G. 1. Ballester-Bolinches A., Pedraza-Aguilera M. C. On minimal subgroups of finite groups // Acta Math. hung. – 1996. – 73, № 4. – P. 335 – 342. 2. Ballester-Bolinches A., Wang Y. Finite groups with some C-normal minimal subgroups // J. Pure and Appl. Algebra. – 2000. – 153. – P. 121 – 127. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2014, т. 66, № 2 194 T. ZHAO, X. ZHANG 3. Buckley J. Finite groups whose minimal subgroups are normal // Math. Z. – 1970. – 116. – S. 15 – 17. 4. Derr J. B., Deskins W. E., Mukherjee N. P. The influence of minimal p-subgroups on the structure of finite groups // Arch. Math. – 1985. – 45. – P. 1 – 4. 5. Deskins W. E. On quasinormal subgroups of finite groups // Math. Z. – 1963. – 82, № 2. – S. 125 – 132. 6. Doerk K., Hawkes T. Finite soluble groups. – Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1992. 7. Gorenstein D. Finite groups. – New York: Chelsea, 1968. 8. Guo W., Shum K. P., Skiba A. N. On solubility and supersolubility of some classes of finite groups // Sci. China Ser. A. – 2009. – 52, № 2. – P. 272 – 286. 9. Guo W., Shum K. P., Skiba A. N. Finite groups with given s-embedded and n-embedded subgroups // J. Algebra. 2009. – 321. – P. 2843 – 2860. 10. Guo W., Shum K. P., Xie F. Finite groups with some weakly s-supplemented subgroups // Glasgow Math. J. – 2011. – 5. – P. 211 – 222. 11. Huppert B. Endliche Gruppen. – New York, Berlin: Springer, 1967. – Vol. 1. 12. Kegel O. H. Sylow-Gruppen und Subnormalteiler endlicher Gruppen // Math. Z. – 1962. – 78. – S. 205 – 221. 13. Li S., Shen Z., Liu J., Liu X. The influence of SS-quasinormality of some subgroups on the structure of finite groups // J. Algebra. – 2008. – 319. – P. 4275 – 4287. 14. Li S., Shen Z., Kong X. On SS-quasinormal subgroups of finite groups // Communs Algebra. – 2008. – 36. – P. 4436 – 4447. 15. Li Y. Some notes on the minimal subgroups of Fitting subgroups of finite groups // J. Pure and Appl. Algebra. – 2002. – 171. – P. 289 – 294. 16. Li Y., Wang Y. On π-quasinormally embedded subgroups of finite group // J. Algebra. – 2004. – 281. – P. 109 – 123. 17. Skiba A. N. On weakly s-permutable subgroups of finite groups // J. Algebra. – 2007. – 315. – P. 192 – 209. 18. Wang Y. On c-normality and its properties // J. Algebra. – 1996. – 180. – P. 954 – 965. 19. Wang Y., Guo W. Nearly s-normality of groups and its properties // Communs Algebra. – 2010. – 38. – P. 3821 – 3836. 20. Wei H. On c-normal maximal and minimal subgroups of Sylow subgroups of finite groups // Communs Algebra. – 2001. – 29, № 5. – P. 2193 – 2200. 21. Wei H., Wang Y. The c-supplemented property of finite groups // Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. – 2007. – 50. – P. 493 – 508. Received 21.04.12, after revision — 27.05.13 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2014, т. 66, № 2
id umjimathkievua-article-2122
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language Ukrainian
English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:19:07Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/5c/a290d5f08ad8272ca6602b71d94c5e5c.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-21222019-12-05T10:24:43Z Weakly SS-Quasinormal Minimal Subgroups and the Nilpotency of a Finite Group Слабко SS-квазінормальні мінімальш підгрупи та нільпотентність скінченної групи Zhang, Xirong Zhao, Tao Чжан, Хіронг Чжао, Тао A subgroup H is said to be an s-permutable subgroup of a finite group G provided that the equality HP =PH holds for every Sylow subgroup P of G. Moreover, H is called SS-quasinormal in G if there exists a supplement B of H to G such that H permutes with every Sylow subgroup of B. We show that H is weakly SS-quasinormal in G if there exists a normal subgroup T of G such that HT is s-permutable and H \ T is SS-quasinormal in G. We study the influence of some weakly SS-quasinormal minimal subgroups on the nilpotency of a finite group G. Numerous results known from the literature are unified and generalized. Підгрупа $H$ називається $s$-переставною підгрупою скінченної групи $G$ за умови, що $HP = PH$ виконується для кожної силовської підгрупи $P$ групи $G$; $H$ називається $SS$-квазінормальною в $G$, якщо існує доповнення B підгрупи $H$ до $G$ таке, що $H$ можна переставити з кожною силовською підгрупою $B$. Показано, що $H$ є слабко $SS$-квазінормальною в $G$, якщо існує нормальна підгрупа $T$ групи $G$ така, що $HT$ є $s$-переставною, а $H \ T$ є $SS$-квазінормальною в $G$. Досліджено вплив деяких слабко $SS$-квазінормальних мінімальних підгруп на нільпотентність скінченної групи $G$. Велику кількість відомих з літератури результатів упорядковано та узагальнено. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2014-02-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2122 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 66 No. 2 (2014); 187–194 Український математичний журнал; Том 66 № 2 (2014); 187–194 1027-3190 uk en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2122/1246 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2122/1247 Copyright (c) 2014 Zhang Xirong; Zhao Tao
spellingShingle Zhang, Xirong
Zhao, Tao
Чжан, Хіронг
Чжао, Тао
Weakly SS-Quasinormal Minimal Subgroups and the Nilpotency of a Finite Group
title Weakly SS-Quasinormal Minimal Subgroups and the Nilpotency of a Finite Group
title_alt Слабко SS-квазінормальні мінімальш підгрупи та нільпотентність скінченної групи
title_full Weakly SS-Quasinormal Minimal Subgroups and the Nilpotency of a Finite Group
title_fullStr Weakly SS-Quasinormal Minimal Subgroups and the Nilpotency of a Finite Group
title_full_unstemmed Weakly SS-Quasinormal Minimal Subgroups and the Nilpotency of a Finite Group
title_short Weakly SS-Quasinormal Minimal Subgroups and the Nilpotency of a Finite Group
title_sort weakly ss-quasinormal minimal subgroups and the nilpotency of a finite group
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2122
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxirong weaklyssquasinormalminimalsubgroupsandthenilpotencyofafinitegroup
AT zhaotao weaklyssquasinormalminimalsubgroupsandthenilpotencyofafinitegroup
AT čžanhírong weaklyssquasinormalminimalsubgroupsandthenilpotencyofafinitegroup
AT čžaotao weaklyssquasinormalminimalsubgroupsandthenilpotencyofafinitegroup
AT zhangxirong slabkosskvazínormalʹnímínímalʹšpídgrupitanílʹpotentnístʹskínčennoígrupi
AT zhaotao slabkosskvazínormalʹnímínímalʹšpídgrupitanílʹpotentnístʹskínčennoígrupi
AT čžanhírong slabkosskvazínormalʹnímínímalʹšpídgrupitanílʹpotentnístʹskínčennoígrupi
AT čžaotao slabkosskvazínormalʹnímínímalʹšpídgrupitanílʹpotentnístʹskínčennoígrupi