On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets

Answering a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska, we prove that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group $G$ the ideal of sets having $\mu$-measure zero for every Banach measure $\mu$ on $G$ is an $F_{\sigma \delta}$ subset of $\{0,1\}^G$.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2012
Main Authors: Zakrzewski, P., Закржевскі, П.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2012
Online Access:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Download file: Pdf

Institution

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860508493708001280
author Zakrzewski, P.
Закржевскі, П.
author_facet Zakrzewski, P.
Закржевскі, П.
author_sort Zakrzewski, P.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T19:29:46Z
description Answering a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska, we prove that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group $G$ the ideal of sets having $\mu$-measure zero for every Banach measure $\mu$ on $G$ is an $F_{\sigma \delta}$ subset of $\{0,1\}^G$.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:26:05Z
format Article
fulltext UDC 512.5 P. Zakrzewski (Inst. Math., Univ. Warsaw, Poland) ON THE COMPLEXITY OF THE IDEAL OF ABSOLUTE NULL SETS* ПРО КОМПЛЕКСНIСТЬ IДЕАЛУ АБСОЛЮТНИХ НУЛЬ-МНОЖИН Answering a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska, we prove that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group G the ideal of sets having µ-measure zero for every Banach measure µ on G is an Fσδ subset of {0, 1}G. У вiдповiдь на питання, поставлене Банахом i Ляскiвською, доведено, що для будь-якої злiченної аменабельної групи G iдеал множин, що мають нульову µ-мiру для будь-якої мiри Банаха µ на G, є Fσδ-пiдмножиною {0, 1}G. 1. Introduction. This note is related to a paper by T. Banakh and N. Lyaskovska [1]. Given an amenable group G, Banakh and Lyaskovska considered the ideal N of absolute null subsets of G, i.e., sets having µ-measure zero for every Banach measure µ on G (a finitely-additive, probability, left-invariant measure µ : P(G)−→ [0, 1] defined on the family of all subsets of G; see [3]). Since each ideal on a countable infinite group G can be considered as a subspace of the Cantor set {0, 1}G it makes sense to consider its descriptive properties. Banach and Lyaskovska asked ([1], Problem 4) whether the ideal of absolute null subsets of the group Z is co-analytic. In this note we prove (see Corollary 3.1) that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group G the ideal N is in fact Fσδ. This follows from a characterisation of absolute null subsets of an arbitrary amenable group (see Proposition 2.1) based on the notion of the intersection number of Kelly [2]. 2. A characterisation of absolute null sets. Following Kelly [2] we define the intersection number I(B) of a family B of subsets of a set X to be inf{i(S)/n(S)} where the infimum is taken over all finite sequences S = (S1, . . . , Sn) of (not necessary distinct) elements of B, n = n(S) is the length of S and i(S) = sup { n∑ i=1 χSi(x) : x ∈ X } . Proposition 2.1. Let G be an amenable group and A ⊆ G. Then the following are equivalent: (1) A is absolute null. (2) The intersection number of the family {gA : g ∈ G} is zero. Proof. (1) ⇒ (2). Assume that I({gA : g ∈ G}) = δ > 0. By a theorem of Kelly (see [2], Theorem 2), there is a finitely additive probability measure m defined on P(G) such that m(gA) ≥ δ for each g ∈ G. Let θ be a Banach measure on G. Following the proof of Invariant Extension Theorem (see [4], Theorem 10.8) define a function µ : P(G)−→ [0, 1] by letting µ(B) = ∫ G m(g−1B)dθ(g), for B ⊆ G. It is easy to see that µ is a Banach measure on G. Moreover, we have µ(A) = ∫ G m(g−1A)dθ(g) ≥ inf{m(g−1A) : g ∈ G} ≥ δ > 0, which shows that A 6∈ N . *This research was partially supported by MNiSW Grant Nr N N201 543638. c© P. ZAKRZEWSKI, 2012 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2012, т. 64, № 2 275 276 P. ZAKRZEWSKI (2)⇒ (1). Let µ be an arbitrary Banach measure on G. Suppose that µ(A) = ε > 0. Then, since µ is left-invariant, we also have µ(gA) = ε for every g ∈ G. Consequently, by [2] (Proposition 1), I({gA : g ∈ G}) ≥ ε > 0. Proposition 2.1 is proved. 3. The Borel complexity of the ideal N . The following corollary of Proposition 2.1 gives an answer to a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska (see [1], Problem 4). Corollary 3.1. Let G be an amenable group and A ⊆ G. Then the following are equivalent: (1) A is absolute null. (2) ∀k ∈ N ∃n ∈ N ∃ḡ ∈ Gn+1 ∀S ⊆ {1, . . . , n+ 1} : |S| n+ 1 > 1 k + 1 ⇒ ⋂ i∈S giA = ∅. In particular, if G is countably infinity, then formula (2) gives a Fσδ definition of the ideal N . Proof. It is easy to see that formula (2) simply states that I({gA : g ∈ G}) = 0 so its equivalence with condition (1) was established in Proposition 2.1. To prove the remaining part of the corollary, assume that G is countably infinity. Then it is enough to show that for fixed n ∈ N, ḡ ∈ Gn+1 and S ⊆ {1, . . . , n+1} the family {A ⊆ G : ⋂ i∈S giA = ∅} is closed in P(G). But this follows from the fact that for A ⊆ G we have⋂ i∈S giA = ∅ ⇐⇒ ∀g ∈ G ∃i ∈ S : g−1i g 6∈ A. Corollary 3.1 is proved. 4. Some open problems. Let G be an arbitrary infinite group. Following a suggestion by Taras Banakh (personal communication) let us call a set A ⊆ G Kelly null if the intersection number of the family {gA : g ∈ G} is zero; denote by K the collection of all Kelly null subsets of G. In view of Proposition 2.1, K is an ideal of subsets of G provided the group G is amenable. On the other hand, Proposition 5.1 of [1] implies that if G has a free subgroup of rank 2, then K is not an ideal; in fact G is then the union of two Kelly null sets. In any case, however, K contains a (possibly proper) subfamily AK = {A ⊆ G : ∀K ∈ K K ∪A ∈ K} which already forms an ideal. The remarks above lead to the following problems suggested by Banakh. Problem 1. Characterise groups G for which K is an ideal. Problem 2. Characterise groups G which are finite unions of elements of K. Problem 3. Given a countably infinite group G find a combinatorial description of elements of the ideal AK. What is its descriptive complexity? In particular, is it Borel? Acknowledgements. The author would like to thank Taras Banakh for his valuable comments and the suggestions above. 1. Banakh T., Lyaskovska N. Completeness of translation–invariant ideals on groups // Ukr. Mat. Zh. – 2010. – 62, № 8. – P. 1022 – 1031. 2. Kelley J. L. Measures on Boolean algebras // Pacif. J. Math. – 1959. – 9. – P. 1165 – 1177. 3. Paterson A. Amenability. – Amer. Math. Soc., 1988. 4. Wagon S. The Banach – Tarski paradox // Encyclopedia Math. and Its Appl. – Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986. Received 13.05.11 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2012, т. 64, № 2
id umjimathkievua-article-2574
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:26:05Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/79/7f34702670299e8cef7f92b4d2ac3779.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-25742020-03-18T19:29:46Z On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets Про комплекснiсть iдеалу абсолютних нуль-множин Zakrzewski, P. Закржевскі, П. Answering a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska, we prove that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group $G$ the ideal of sets having $\mu$-measure zero for every Banach measure $\mu$ on $G$ is an $F_{\sigma \delta}$ subset of $\{0,1\}^G$. У вiдповiдь на питання, поставлене Банахом i Ляскiвською, доведено, що для будь-якої злiченної аменабельної групи $G$ iдеал множин, що мають нульову $\mu$-мiру для будь-якої мiри Банаха $\mu$ на $G$, є $F_{\sigma \delta}$-пiдмножиною $\{0,1\}^G$. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2012-02-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 64 No. 2 (2012); 275-276 Український математичний журнал; Том 64 № 2 (2012); 275-276 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574/1907 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574/1908 Copyright (c) 2012 Zakrzewski P.
spellingShingle Zakrzewski, P.
Закржевскі, П.
On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets
title On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets
title_alt Про комплекснiсть iдеалу абсолютних нуль-множин
title_full On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets
title_fullStr On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets
title_full_unstemmed On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets
title_short On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets
title_sort on the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574
work_keys_str_mv AT zakrzewskip onthecomplexityoftheidealofabsolutenullsets
AT zakrževskíp onthecomplexityoftheidealofabsolutenullsets
AT zakrzewskip prokompleksnistʹidealuabsolûtnihnulʹmnožin
AT zakrževskíp prokompleksnistʹidealuabsolûtnihnulʹmnožin