On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets
Answering a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska, we prove that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group $G$ the ideal of sets having $\mu$-measure zero for every Banach measure $\mu$ on $G$ is an $F_{\sigma \delta}$ subset of $\{0,1\}^G$.
Saved in:
| Date: | 2012 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
2012
|
| Online Access: | https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Journal Title: | Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal |
| Download file: | |
Institution
Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal| _version_ | 1860508493708001280 |
|---|---|
| author | Zakrzewski, P. Закржевскі, П. |
| author_facet | Zakrzewski, P. Закржевскі, П. |
| author_sort | Zakrzewski, P. |
| baseUrl_str | https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2020-03-18T19:29:46Z |
| description | Answering a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska, we prove that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group $G$ the ideal of sets having $\mu$-measure zero for every
Banach measure $\mu$ on $G$ is an $F_{\sigma \delta}$ subset of $\{0,1\}^G$. |
| first_indexed | 2026-03-24T02:26:05Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
UDC 512.5
P. Zakrzewski (Inst. Math., Univ. Warsaw, Poland)
ON THE COMPLEXITY OF THE IDEAL OF ABSOLUTE NULL SETS*
ПРО КОМПЛЕКСНIСТЬ IДЕАЛУ АБСОЛЮТНИХ НУЛЬ-МНОЖИН
Answering a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska, we prove that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group G the
ideal of sets having µ-measure zero for every Banach measure µ on G is an Fσδ subset of {0, 1}G.
У вiдповiдь на питання, поставлене Банахом i Ляскiвською, доведено, що для будь-якої злiченної аменабельної
групи G iдеал множин, що мають нульову µ-мiру для будь-якої мiри Банаха µ на G, є Fσδ-пiдмножиною {0, 1}G.
1. Introduction. This note is related to a paper by T. Banakh and N. Lyaskovska [1]. Given an
amenable group G, Banakh and Lyaskovska considered the ideal N of absolute null subsets of G,
i.e., sets having µ-measure zero for every Banach measure µ on G (a finitely-additive, probability,
left-invariant measure µ : P(G)−→ [0, 1] defined on the family of all subsets of G; see [3]). Since
each ideal on a countable infinite group G can be considered as a subspace of the Cantor set {0, 1}G
it makes sense to consider its descriptive properties. Banach and Lyaskovska asked ([1], Problem 4)
whether the ideal of absolute null subsets of the group Z is co-analytic. In this note we prove (see
Corollary 3.1) that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group G the ideal N is in fact Fσδ.
This follows from a characterisation of absolute null subsets of an arbitrary amenable group (see
Proposition 2.1) based on the notion of the intersection number of Kelly [2].
2. A characterisation of absolute null sets. Following Kelly [2] we define the intersection
number I(B) of a family B of subsets of a set X to be inf{i(S)/n(S)} where the infimum is taken
over all finite sequences S = (S1, . . . , Sn) of (not necessary distinct) elements of B, n = n(S) is the
length of S and
i(S) = sup
{
n∑
i=1
χSi(x) : x ∈ X
}
.
Proposition 2.1. Let G be an amenable group and A ⊆ G. Then the following are equivalent:
(1) A is absolute null.
(2) The intersection number of the family {gA : g ∈ G} is zero.
Proof. (1) ⇒ (2). Assume that I({gA : g ∈ G}) = δ > 0. By a theorem of Kelly (see [2],
Theorem 2), there is a finitely additive probability measure m defined on P(G) such that m(gA) ≥ δ
for each g ∈ G.
Let θ be a Banach measure on G. Following the proof of Invariant Extension Theorem (see [4],
Theorem 10.8) define a function µ : P(G)−→ [0, 1] by letting
µ(B) =
∫
G
m(g−1B)dθ(g), for B ⊆ G.
It is easy to see that µ is a Banach measure on G. Moreover, we have
µ(A) =
∫
G
m(g−1A)dθ(g) ≥ inf{m(g−1A) : g ∈ G} ≥ δ > 0,
which shows that A 6∈ N .
*This research was partially supported by MNiSW Grant Nr N N201 543638.
c© P. ZAKRZEWSKI, 2012
ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2012, т. 64, № 2 275
276 P. ZAKRZEWSKI
(2)⇒ (1). Let µ be an arbitrary Banach measure on G. Suppose that µ(A) = ε > 0. Then, since
µ is left-invariant, we also have µ(gA) = ε for every g ∈ G. Consequently, by [2] (Proposition 1),
I({gA : g ∈ G}) ≥ ε > 0.
Proposition 2.1 is proved.
3. The Borel complexity of the ideal N . The following corollary of Proposition 2.1 gives an
answer to a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska (see [1], Problem 4).
Corollary 3.1. Let G be an amenable group and A ⊆ G. Then the following are equivalent:
(1) A is absolute null.
(2) ∀k ∈ N ∃n ∈ N ∃ḡ ∈ Gn+1 ∀S ⊆ {1, . . . , n+ 1} :
|S|
n+ 1
>
1
k + 1
⇒
⋂
i∈S
giA = ∅.
In particular, if G is countably infinity, then formula (2) gives a Fσδ definition of the ideal N .
Proof. It is easy to see that formula (2) simply states that I({gA : g ∈ G}) = 0 so its equivalence
with condition (1) was established in Proposition 2.1.
To prove the remaining part of the corollary, assume that G is countably infinity. Then it is enough
to show that for fixed n ∈ N, ḡ ∈ Gn+1 and S ⊆ {1, . . . , n+1} the family {A ⊆ G :
⋂
i∈S giA = ∅}
is closed in P(G).
But this follows from the fact that for A ⊆ G we have⋂
i∈S
giA = ∅ ⇐⇒ ∀g ∈ G ∃i ∈ S : g−1i g 6∈ A.
Corollary 3.1 is proved.
4. Some open problems. Let G be an arbitrary infinite group. Following a suggestion by Taras
Banakh (personal communication) let us call a set A ⊆ G Kelly null if the intersection number of
the family {gA : g ∈ G} is zero; denote by K the collection of all Kelly null subsets of G. In view
of Proposition 2.1, K is an ideal of subsets of G provided the group G is amenable. On the other
hand, Proposition 5.1 of [1] implies that if G has a free subgroup of rank 2, then K is not an ideal; in
fact G is then the union of two Kelly null sets. In any case, however, K contains a (possibly proper)
subfamily AK = {A ⊆ G : ∀K ∈ K K ∪A ∈ K} which already forms an ideal.
The remarks above lead to the following problems suggested by Banakh.
Problem 1. Characterise groups G for which K is an ideal.
Problem 2. Characterise groups G which are finite unions of elements of K.
Problem 3. Given a countably infinite group G find a combinatorial description of elements of
the ideal AK. What is its descriptive complexity? In particular, is it Borel?
Acknowledgements. The author would like to thank Taras Banakh for his valuable comments
and the suggestions above.
1. Banakh T., Lyaskovska N. Completeness of translation–invariant ideals on groups // Ukr. Mat. Zh. – 2010. – 62,
№ 8. – P. 1022 – 1031.
2. Kelley J. L. Measures on Boolean algebras // Pacif. J. Math. – 1959. – 9. – P. 1165 – 1177.
3. Paterson A. Amenability. – Amer. Math. Soc., 1988.
4. Wagon S. The Banach – Tarski paradox // Encyclopedia Math. and Its Appl. – Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986.
Received 13.05.11
ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2012, т. 64, № 2
|
| id | umjimathkievua-article-2574 |
| institution | Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2026-03-24T02:26:05Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | umjimathkievua/79/7f34702670299e8cef7f92b4d2ac3779.pdf |
| spelling | umjimathkievua-article-25742020-03-18T19:29:46Z On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets Про комплекснiсть iдеалу абсолютних нуль-множин Zakrzewski, P. Закржевскі, П. Answering a question of Banakh and Lyaskovska, we prove that for an arbitrary countable infinite amenable group $G$ the ideal of sets having $\mu$-measure zero for every Banach measure $\mu$ on $G$ is an $F_{\sigma \delta}$ subset of $\{0,1\}^G$. У вiдповiдь на питання, поставлене Банахом i Ляскiвською, доведено, що для будь-якої злiченної аменабельної групи $G$ iдеал множин, що мають нульову $\mu$-мiру для будь-якої мiри Банаха $\mu$ на $G$, є $F_{\sigma \delta}$-пiдмножиною $\{0,1\}^G$. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2012-02-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 64 No. 2 (2012); 275-276 Український математичний журнал; Том 64 № 2 (2012); 275-276 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574/1907 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574/1908 Copyright (c) 2012 Zakrzewski P. |
| spellingShingle | Zakrzewski, P. Закржевскі, П. On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets |
| title | On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets |
| title_alt | Про комплекснiсть iдеалу абсолютних нуль-множин |
| title_full | On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets |
| title_fullStr | On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets |
| title_full_unstemmed | On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets |
| title_short | On the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets |
| title_sort | on the complexity of the ideal of absolute null sets |
| url | https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2574 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zakrzewskip onthecomplexityoftheidealofabsolutenullsets AT zakrževskíp onthecomplexityoftheidealofabsolutenullsets AT zakrzewskip prokompleksnistʹidealuabsolûtnihnulʹmnožin AT zakrževskíp prokompleksnistʹidealuabsolûtnihnulʹmnožin |