The bidual of r-algebras

We prove that the order continuous bidual of an Archimedean r-algebra is a Dedekind complete r-algebra with respect to the Arens multiplications.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2011
Main Authors: Yilmaz, R., Ілмаз, Р.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2011
Online Access:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2756
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Download file: Pdf

Institution

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860508722902597632
author Yilmaz, R.
Ілмаз, Р.
author_facet Yilmaz, R.
Ілмаз, Р.
author_sort Yilmaz, R.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T19:35:13Z
description We prove that the order continuous bidual of an Archimedean r-algebra is a Dedekind complete r-algebra with respect to the Arens multiplications.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:29:44Z
format Article
fulltext UDC 512.5 R. Yilmaz (Rize Univ., Turkey) THE BIDUAL OF r-ALGEBRAS БIДУАЛ r-АЛГЕБР We prove that the order continuous bidual of an Archimedean r-algebra is a Dedekind complete r-algebra with respect to the Arens multiplications. Доведено, що порядковий неперервний бiдуал архiмедової r-алгебри є повною r-алгеброю Дедекiнда вiдносно множень Аренса. 1. Introduction. In [11] we studied a new class of lattice ordered algebras; so-called r- algebras and presented its relation with the certain lattice ordered algebras; f -algebras [5] (a lattice ordered algebra A with the property that a∧ b = 0 implies ac∧ b = ca∧ b = 0 for all c ∈ A+), almost f -algebras [6] (a lattice ordered algebra A for which a ∧ b = 0 in A implies ab = 0), d-algebras [9] (a lattice ordered algebra A such that a ∧ b = 0 in A implies ac ∧ bc = ca ∧ cb = 0 for all c ∈ A+), pseudo f -algebras [7] (a lattice ordered algebra A having the property that ab = 0 if a ∧ b is a nilpotent element of A) and generalized almost f -algebras [8] (a lattice ordered algebra A such that ab is an annihilator of A if a ∧ b = 0). A lattice ordered algebra A in which a ∧ b = 0 in A implies ab ∧ ba = 0 is called an r-algebra. This is a wider class than both the classes of almost f -algebras and d-algebras but in general independent of generalized almost f -algebras. Hence an r-algebra is a generalization of a d-algebra in much the same way as an almost f -algebra is a generalization of an f -algebra. Observe also that the Archimedean r-algebra A is not commutative (for details, see [11]). In this paper we concentrate on the Arens multiplications [2, 3] in the algebraic bidual of r-algebras and prove that the order continuous bidual of an Archimedean r- algebra is again a Dedekind complete (and hence Archimedean) r-algebra. This is the extension of a result of Bernau and Huijsmans in [4] in which they prove that the order continuous bidual of an almost f -algebra (respectively d-algebra) is again an almost f -algebra (respectively d-algebra). We now assume that A is a lattice ordered algebra, which is not necessarily commu- tative or unital. The following two multiplications in A′′ can be introduced, which are referred to as the first and second Arens multiplications [2, 3]. They are accomplished in three steps: for a, b ∈ A, f ∈ A′ and F,G ∈ A′′, define a · f, f · F : A 7→ R and F ·G : A′ 7→ R (fa, Ff and FG for the second multiplication) by (a · f)(b) = f(ba), (f · F )(a) = F (a · f), (F ·G)(f) = G(f · F ) and (fa)(b) = f(ab), (Ff)(a) = F (fa), (FG)(f) = F (Gf). c© R. YILMAZ, 2011 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 5 713 714 R. YILMAZ We shall concentrate on the first Arens multiplication; similar results hold for the second. For the elementary theory of `-spaces and terminology not explained here we refer to [1, 10, 12]. 2. The order continuous bidual of r-algebras. In this section we consider the order continuous bidual of the class of Archimedean r-algebras and prove that the order continuous bidual of an r-algebra A is again an r-algebra with respect to the Arens multiplication. We first recall some relevant notions. The canonical mapping a 7→ â of a vector lattice A into its order bidual A′′ is defined by â(f) = f(a) for all f ∈ A′. For each a ∈ A, â defines an order continuous algebraic lattice homomorphism on A′ and the canonical image  of A is a subalgebra of (A′)′c. Moreover the band S = {F ∈ (A′)′c : |F | ≤ x̂ for some x ∈ A+} generated by  is order dense in (A′)′c; that is, for each F ∈ (A′)′c, there exists an upwards directed net {Gλ : λ ∈ Λ} in S such that 0 < Gλ ↑ F. Lemma 2.1. Let A be an r-algebra and 0 ≤ G,H ∈ (A′)′c. If G ∧ H = 0 and G,H ≤ x̂ for some x ∈ A+, then G ·H ∧H ·G = 0. Proof. Let 0 ≤ f ∈ A′ and x ∈ A+. Then define the positive linear functional fx in A′ by (fx)(y) = f(xy) for all y ∈ A. It follows that f · x̂ = fx since (f · x̂)(y) = x̂(y · f) = (y · f)(x) = f(xy) = (fx)(y) for all y ∈ A. Hence 0 ≤ x · f + fx ∈ A′, and so, by Corollary 1.2 of [4], there exist g, h ∈ A′ with g ∧ h = 0, and G(g) = 0 = H(h) such that x · f + fx = g + h. Hence inf{g(y) + h(z) : x = y + z, y, z ∈ A+} = (g ∧ h)(x) = 0, which implies that, for ε > 0, there exist y, z ∈ A+ such that x = y + z and g(y) < ε and h(z) < ε. We now define the linear functionals G1 and H1 on A′ by G1 = G ∧ ̂(y − y ∧ z) and H1 = H ∧ ̂(z − y ∧ z). Clearly, 0 ≤ G1, H1 ∈ (A′)′c and the following inequalities hold: 0 ≤ H −H1 = (H − (z − y ∧ z))+ ≤ (x̂− ̂(z − y ∧ z))+ = ( ̂y + z − (z − y ∧ z))+ = ( ̂y + y ∧ z)+ ≤ 2ŷ, (1) and similarly 0 ≤ G−G1 ≤ 2ẑ. (2) Since (y − y ∧ z) ∧ (z − y ∧ z) = (y ∧ z)− (y ∧ z) = 0 in A and A is an r-algebra, (y − y ∧ z)(z − y ∧ z) ∧ (z − y ∧ z)(y − y ∧ z) = 0, and so 0 ≤ G1 ·H1∧H1 ·G1 ≤ ̂(y − y ∧ z) · ̂(z − y ∧ z)∧ ̂(z − y ∧ z) · ̂(y − y ∧ z) = 0; i.e., G1 ·H1 ∧H1 ·G1 = 0. (3) We next consider the elements 0 ≤ G · (H −H1), (G − G1) ·H1, H · (G − G1) and (H −H1) ·G1 of (A′)′c. Then, by (1), ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 5 THE BIDUAL OF r-ALGEBRAS 715 (G · (H −H1))(f) ≤ (x̂ · (H −H1))(f) = (H −H1)(f · x̂) = = (H −H1)(fx) ≤ (H −H1)(fx+ x · f) = = (H −H1)(g + h) = (H −H1)(g) + (H −H1)(h) ≤ ≤ (H −H1)(g) +H(h) ≤ 2ŷ(g) + 0 = 2g(y) (4) and, by (2), ((G−G1) ·H1)(f) ≤ ((G−G1) · x̂)(f) = x̂(f · (G−G1)) = = (f · (G−G1))(x) = (G−G1)(x · f) ≤ ≤ (G−G1)(x · f + fx) = (G−G1)(g + h) = = (G−G1)(g) + (G−G1)(h) ≤ ≤ G(g) + (G−G1)(h) ≤ 2h(z). (5) It follows by symmetry that (H · (G−G1))(f) ≤ 2h(z) and ((H −H1) ·G1)(f) ≤ 2g(y). (6) Using the fact that (a+ b) ∧ c ≤ a ∧ c+ b ∧ c ≤ a+ b ∧ c in `-spaces and (3), we find G ·H ∧H ·G = [ ( G · (H −H1) + (G−G1) ·H1 +G1 ·H1 ) ]∧ ∧[H · (G−G1) + (H −H1) ·G1 +H1 ·G1] ≤ ≤ G · (H −H1) + (G−G1) ·H1+ +G1 ·H1 ∧ [ H · (G−G1) + (H −H1) ·G1 +H1 ·G1 ] ≤ ≤ G · (H −H1) + (G−G1) ·H1+ +G1 ·H1 ∧ (H · (G−G1) + (H −H1) ·G1)+ +G1 ·H1 ∧H1 ·G1 ≤ ≤ G · (H −H1) + (G−G1) ·H1+ +H · (G−G1) + (H −H1) ·G1. Hence, by (4), (5) and (6), 0 ≤ (G ·H ∧H ·G)(f) ≤ ((G · (H −H1))(f) + ((G−G1) ·H1))(f)+ +(H · (G−G1))(f) + ((H −H1) ·G1))(f) ≤ ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 5 716 R. YILMAZ ≤ 2g(y) + 2h(z) + 2h(z) + 2g(y) ≤ 8ε. Since this holds for an arbitrary ε > 0, we have (G · H ∧ H · G)(f) = 0 for all 0 ≤ f ∈ A′. It now follows that for all f ∈ A′ (G ·H ∧H ·G)(f) = (G ·H ∧H ·G)(f+)− (G ·H ∧H ·G)(f−) = 0, and so G ·H ∧H ·G = 0. We now in a position to express the main result of this work. Theorem 2.1. The order continuous bidual of an r-algebra is a Dedekind com- plete (and hence Archimedean) r-algebra. Proof. Let A be an r-algebra. We only need to prove G ·H ∧H ·G = 0 whenever 0 ≤ G,H ∈ (A′)′c with G ∧ H = 0. To this end, consider the band S generated by the canonical image  of A in (A′)′c. Since S is order dense in (A′)′c, there exist Gα, Hβ ∈ S such that 0 ≤ Gα ↑ G and 0 ≤ Hβ ↑ H with 0 ≤ Gα ≤ x̂α and 0 ≤ Hβ ≤ ŷβ for some xα, yβ ∈ A+. It follows from G∧H = 0 that Gα ∧Hβ = 0 for all α, β. Furthermore, 0 ≤ Gα, Hβ ≤ x̂α + yβ . Hence, by Lemma 2.1, we see that Gα ·Hβ ∧Hβ ·Gα = 0 (7) for all α and β. Now let 0 ≤ f ∈ A′. It follows from 0 ≤ Gα ↑ G that 0 ≤ ≤ Gα(x · f) ↑ G(x · f); i.e., 0 ≤ (f · Gα)(x) ↑ (f · G)(x) for all x ∈ A+. This shows that 0 ≤ f · Gα ↑ f · G. Hence, by the order continuity of Hβ for each β, 0 ≤ Hβ(f ·Gα) ↑ Hβ(f ·G); i.e., 0 ≤ (Gα ·Hβ)(f) ↑ (G ·Hβ)(f), which implies that, for each β , 0 ≤ Gα ·Hβ ↑ G ·Hβ . (8) Similarly, since 0 ≤ Hβ ↑ H, 0 ≤ Hβ(f · G) ↑ H(f · G); i.e., 0 ≤ ≤ (G ·Hβ)(f) ↑ (G ·H)(f) for all 0 ≤ f ∈ A′, and so 0 ≤ G ·Hβ ↑ G ·H. (9) In the same way, using the order continuity of Gα for each α, we obtain 0 ≤ Hβ ·Gα ↑ H ·Gα, (10) leading to 0 ≤ H ·Gα ↑ H ·G. (11) It follows from (8) and (10) that 0 ≤ Gα ·Hβ∧Hβ ·Gα ↑ G·Hβ∧H ·Gα, and so, by (7), G·Hβ∧H ·Gα = 0 for all α and β. On the other hand, 0 ≤ G·Hβ∧H ·Gα ↑ G·H∧H ·G by (9) and (11), and so G ·H ∧H ·G = 0, as required. As remarked earlier, the order bidual A′′ of an almost f -algebra (respectively f - algebra) A is an almost f -algebra (respectively f -algebra) which may not be true for the order biduals of either d-algebras [4] or r-algebras. However we have the following consequence. Corollary 2.1. The order bidual of a commutative r-algebra is a Dedekind com- plete r-algebra. 1. Aliprantis C. D., Burkinshaw O. Positive operators. – Acad. Press, 1985. 2. Arens R. Operations induced in function classes // Monatsh. Math. – 1951. – 55. – P. 1 – 19. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 5 THE BIDUAL OF r-ALGEBRAS 717 3. Arens R. The adjoint of a bilinear operation // Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. – 1951. – 2. – P. 839 – 848. 4. Bernau S. J., Huijsmans C. B. The order bidual of almost f -algebras and d-algebras // Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. – 1995. – 347. – P. 4259 – 4275. 5. Birkhoff G., Pierce R. S. Lattice-ordered rings // An. Acad. brasil. Ciénc. – 1956. – 28. – P. 41 – 49. 6. Birkhoff G. Lattice theory // Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. – 1967. – № 25. 7. Boulabiar K., Hadded F. A class of lattice ordered algebras // Algebra Univ. – 2003. – 50. – P. 305 – 323. 8. Chil E. Generalized almost f -algebras // Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin. – 2009. – 16, № 2. – P. 223 – 234. 9. Kudláček V. On some types of `-rings // Sb. VUT Brně. – 1962. – 1 – 2. – P. 179 – 181. 10. Luxemburg W. A. J., Zaanen A. C. Riesz spaces I. – North-Holland, 1971. 11. Yilmaz R. The class of r-algebras (Submited). 12. Zaanen A. C. Introduction to Operator theory in Riesz spaces. – Springer, 1997. Received 25.10.10 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2011, т. 63, № 5
id umjimathkievua-article-2756
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:29:44Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/c1/1fd2abfcce3b9e9c09376bc61c9e40c1.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-27562020-03-18T19:35:13Z The bidual of r-algebras Бiдуал r-алгебр Yilmaz, R. Ілмаз, Р. We prove that the order continuous bidual of an Archimedean r-algebra is a Dedekind complete r-algebra with respect to the Arens multiplications. Доведено, що порядковий неперервний бiдуал архiмедової r-алгебри є повною r-алгеброю Дедекiнда вiдносно множень Аренса. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2011-05-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2756 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 63 No. 5 (2011); 713-717 Український математичний журнал; Том 63 № 5 (2011); 713-717 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2756/2268 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2756/2269 Copyright (c) 2011 Yilmaz R.
spellingShingle Yilmaz, R.
Ілмаз, Р.
The bidual of r-algebras
title The bidual of r-algebras
title_alt Бiдуал r-алгебр
title_full The bidual of r-algebras
title_fullStr The bidual of r-algebras
title_full_unstemmed The bidual of r-algebras
title_short The bidual of r-algebras
title_sort bidual of r-algebras
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2756
work_keys_str_mv AT yilmazr thebidualofralgebras
AT ílmazr thebidualofralgebras
AT yilmazr bidualralgebr
AT ílmazr bidualralgebr
AT yilmazr bidualofralgebras
AT ílmazr bidualofralgebras