On the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity

We study the conditions of convergence to infinity for some classes of functions extending the well-known class of regularly varying (RV) functions, such as, e.g., $O$-regularly varying (ORV) functions or positive increasing (PI) functions.

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2010
Автори: Buldygin, V. V., Klesov, O. I., Steinebach, J. G., Булдигін, В. В., Клесов, О. І., Штайнебах, Й. Г.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2010
Онлайн доступ:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2956
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860508960910475264
author Buldygin, V. V.
Klesov, O. I.
Steinebach, J. G.
Булдигін, В. В.
Клесов, О. І.
Штайнебах, Й. Г.
author_facet Buldygin, V. V.
Klesov, O. I.
Steinebach, J. G.
Булдигін, В. В.
Клесов, О. І.
Штайнебах, Й. Г.
author_sort Buldygin, V. V.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T19:41:19Z
description We study the conditions of convergence to infinity for some classes of functions extending the well-known class of regularly varying (RV) functions, such as, e.g., $O$-regularly varying (ORV) functions or positive increasing (PI) functions.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:33:31Z
format Article
fulltext UDC 517.51 V. V. Buldygin, O. I. Klesov (Nat. Techn. Univ. Ukraine “KPI”, Kyiv), J. G. Steinebach (Math. Inst., Univ. Köln, Germany) ON THE CONVERGENCE TO INFINITY OF POSITIVE INCREASING FUNCTIONS ПРО ЗБIЖНIСТЬ ДО НЕСКIНЧЕННОСТI ДОДАТНО ЗРОСТАЮЧИХ ФУНКЦIЙ We study conditions for the convergence to infinity of some classes of functions extending the well-known class of regularly varying (RV) functions, such as, for example, O-regularly varying (ORV) functions or positive increasing (PI) functions. Дослiджено умови збiжностi до нескiнченностi деяких класiв функцiй, що розширюють вiдомий клас регулярно змiнних функцiй, таких, як, наприклад, O-регулярно змiнних функцiй або додатно змiнних функцiй. 1. Introduction. There is a variety of problems in mathematical as well as in stochastic analysis, where an ordinary or a random function under investigation is assumed to converge to infinity when its argument tends to infinity. An example of such a problem is the question of equivalence of the solutionsX(t) and x(t), respectively, of a stochastic differential equation (SDE) and its corresponding ordinary differential equation (ODE) where the ODE is obtained from the SDE after excluding the stochastic differential therein (see [15, 21, 16]). More precisely, under a certain set of assumptionsX(t) ∼ x(t) almost surely as t→∞ if X(t)→∞ almost surely as t→∞. This result was derived from a generalization of Karamata’s theory of regular varia- tion (see also [12]). Indeed, Karamata’s theory provides another area, now in mathemat- ical analysis, in which the convergence to infinity of functions plays a crucial role. Recall that Karamata [18], in 1930, introduced the notion of regularly varying (RV) functions and proved a number of fundamental results for this important class of func- tions (see also [19]). Later on, these results and their further generalizations developed into a well-established theory having a wide range of applications (cf., e.g., Bingham et al. [6] and Seneta [24]). Indeed, after the seminal paper [18], it is a variety of generalizations of RV functions that has been introduced and discussed. Certainly a first one to mention is the class of O- regularly varying (ORV) functions due to Avakumović [3], which has also been studied in numerous papers (see, for example, [20, 14, 1, 4, 2]). In fact, it turns out that, in many asymptotic problems, an important role is played by classes of functions, which generalize RV functions in one way or another. In the current paper, we continue our earlier work in [7 – 9, 11]. Here now, main attention is paid to the class of (so-called) positive increasing (PI) functions (see Defi- nition 2.2 below). These and some related functions have been studied by many authors (cf., e.g., [5, 17, 25, 13, 23], to mention just a few). Along with the classes of mea- surable ORV and PI functions, we also consider their extensions, i.e., WORV and WPI functions, which may be measurable or nonmeasurable functions as well. c© V. V. BULDYGIN, O. I. KLESOV, J. G. STEINEBACH, 2010 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 1299 1300 V. V. BULDYGIN, O. I. KLESOV, J. G. STEINEBACH The class of PI functions contains all RV functions with positive index. One of the important properties of the latter functions is that they tend to infinity as their argument tends to infinity (see, for example, [6, 24]). We show below that this property retains for all functions, which are both ORV and PI functions. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 contains all necessary definitions con- cerning the classes of functions considered in this paper. In Section 3 we prove that the upper limit of a WPI function as well as the upper limits of its limit functions are infinite. Some extra conditions, being sufficient for WPI functions to tend to infinity, are discussed in Section 4, where we separately treat the conditions that either contain or not the assumption of measurability. A counterexample, given in Section 5, shows that Theorem 4.1 cannot be improved in general. 2. Definitions and some preliminary results. Let R be the set of real numbers, R+ the set of positive reals, N the set of positive integers, and let N0 = N ∪ {0}. Denote by F the set of all real functions f = (f(t), t ≥ 0) and let F+ = ⋃ a>0 {f ∈ F : f(t) > 0, t ∈ [a,∞)}. It is clear that f ∈ F+ if and only if f(t) > 0 for all sufficiently large t. By F(∞) we denote the set of functions f ∈ F+ such that lim sup t→∞ f(t) =∞, and by F∞ we denote the subset of F(∞) such that lim t→∞ f(t) =∞. Throughout the paper, “measurability” means measurability in the Lebesgue sense. For f ∈ F+, define its upper and lower limit function, i.e., f∗(c) = lim sup t→∞ f(ct) f(t) and f∗(c) = lim inf t→∞ f(ct) f(t) , c > 0, taking values in [0,∞]. Limit functions are useful for defining and studying various classes of real functions. Note that f∗ and f∗ are also called the index functions of f. The following properties of limit functions follow directly from the definitions. Lemma 2.1. Let f ∈ F+. Then (i) for all c > 0, 0 ≤ f∗(c) ≤ f∗(c) ≤ ∞; (ii) for all c > 0, f∗(c) = 1 f∗(1/c), where 1/∞ = 0 and 1/0 =∞; (iii) for all c1 and c2 > 0, the following inequalities hold if they do not contain an expression 0 · ∞ or∞ · 0: f∗(c1)f∗(c2) ≤ f∗(c1c2) ≤ min{f∗(c1)f∗(c2), f∗(c2)f∗(c1)} ≤ ≤ max{f∗(c1)f∗(c2), f∗(c2)f∗(c1)} ≤ f∗(c1c2) ≤ f∗(c1)f∗(c2); (iv) f∗(1) = f∗(1) = 1. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 ON THE CONVERGENCE TO INFINITY OF POSITIVE INCREASING FUNCTIONS 1301 ORV and RV functions. We first recall the definition of ORV functions (see [3, 20], or [1]). Definition 2.1. A function f ∈ F+ is called a function with O-regular variation in the wide sense (WORV) if 0 < f∗(c) ≤ f∗(c) <∞ for all c > 1. (2.1) Correspondingly, a measurable WORV function is called a function with O-regular variation (ORV). The class of all WORV (ORV) functions is denoted by WORV (ORV). We say that a measurable function f ∈ F+ varies regularly [18, 19], or that it is an RV function, if f∗(c) = f∗(c) = κf (c) ∈ (0,∞) for all c > 0, that is, the limit κf (c) = lim t→∞ f(ct) f(t) exists and is positive and finite for all c > 0. The class of all RV functions is denoted by RV . It is clear that any RV function belongs to the class ORV . If f ∈ RV , then κf (c) = κ(c, ρ) = cρ, c > 0, (2.2) for some real number ρ called the index of the function f . By RV+ we mean the class of all RV functions with positive index. RV functions such that ρ = 0 are called slowly varying (SV) functions. For any RV function f , the following representation holds: f(t) = tρ`(t), t > 0, where (`(t), t > 0) is a slowly varying function. WPI and PI functions. Here we recall the definitions of WPI and PI functions (see [5, 17, 7, 9, 11]). Definition 2.2. A function f ∈ F+ is said to be positive increasing in the wide sense (WPI) if f∗(c0) > 1 for some c0 > 1. (2.3) Correspondingly, a measurable WPI function is said to be positive increasing (PI). The class of all PI (WPI) functions is denoted by PI (WPI). Relation (2.2) implies that RV+ ⊂ PI. 2.1. An example. There are several cases where the limit functions f∗ and f∗ determine the asymptotics of the original function f . Say, if f∗(c) = f∗(c) for all c > 0, then f is regularly varying. If additionally (2.3) holds, then f(x)→∞ as x→∞. This is not the case in more general situations. Below we construct a function f depending on two parameters 0 < θ1 < 1 and θ2 > 1 such that f∗(c) = θ1 and f∗(c) = θ2 for c > 1. Surprisingly, the asymptotics of f only depends on the specific relation between θ1 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 1302 V. V. BULDYGIN, O. I. KLESOV, J. G. STEINEBACH and θ2. In particular, lim f(x) =∞ if θ1θ2 > 1. Otherwise, f is bounded. Note that this function f is measurable but f 6∈ PI. Example 2.1. Let 0 < θ1 < 1 < θ2 be two given numbers. We construct a function f such that f∗(c) = θ1 and f∗(c) = θ2 for all c > 1. First, choose positive sequences {Hn} and {tn} as follows: H1 = 1, Hn+1 = θ1θ2Hn, t1 = 1, tn+1 = n2tn, n ≥ 1. For simplicity, let Ln = [tn, ntn) and Rn = [ntn, tn+1). Then the function f is given as f(t) =  1, 0 ≤ t < t2, Hn, t ∈ Ln, n ≥ 2, θ1Hn, t ∈ Rn, n ≥ 2. Let c > 1. If t is sufficiently large and t ∈ Ln ∪Rn, then ct ∈ Ln ∪Rn ∪ Ln+1. Thus, for c > 1 and sufficiently large t, f(ct) f(t) =  1, if ct, t ∈ Ln, or ct, t ∈ Rn, θ1, if ct ∈ Rn, but t ∈ Ln, θ2, if ct ∈ Ln+1, but t ∈ Rn. Therefore, for all c > 1, f∗(c) = θ1, f∗(c) = θ2. Note that lim f(t) =∞, if θ1θ2 > 1, lim inf f(t) = θ1, lim sup f(t) = 1, if θ1θ2 = 1, lim f(t) = 0, if θ1θ2 < 1. The rest of the paper is devoted to finding some conditions imposed on limit func- tions that imply lim sup f(x) = ∞ or lim f(x) = ∞. In doing so, the basic tool is the WPI property (2.3). 3. Upper limits of WPI functions. The following result contains a characterization of WPI functions in terms of their lower limit functions. In particular, it shows that f ∈ WPI if and only if f∗ ∈ F(∞). Proposition 3.1. For f ∈ F+, the following three conditions are equivalent: (a) f ∈ WPI; (b) lim supc→∞ f∗(c) =∞; (c) lim supc→∞ f∗(c) > 1. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 ON THE CONVERGENCE TO INFINITY OF POSITIVE INCREASING FUNCTIONS 1303 Proof. If f ∈ WPI, then condition (2.3) and Lemma 2.1 imply that lim sup c→∞ f∗(c) ≥ lim sup m→∞ f∗(c0 m) ≥ lim sup m→∞ (f∗(c0))m =∞. Therefore the implication (a) =⇒ (b) is proved. On the other hand, the implications (b) =⇒ (c) and (c) =⇒ (a) are trivial. Lemma 2.1 (i) and Proposition 3.1 imply that the lower and upper limit functions belong to the class F(∞) if f ∈ WPI. Below we show that WPI functions themselves belong to the class F(∞). Lemma 3.1. If f ∈ WPI, then f ∈ F(∞). Proof. Let f ∈ WPI, that is, condition (2.3) holds. This implies that there are constants c0 > 1, t0 > 0, and r > 1 such that f(t) > 0 for t ≥ t0, and f(c0t) f(t) ≥ r for all t ≥ t0. (3.1) Thus f(cm0 t) f(t) = f(cm0 t) f(cm−10 t) · · · f(c0t) f(t) ≥ rm and f(cm0 t) ≥ rmf(t) (3.2) for all t ≥ t0 and all m ∈ N0. This implies that lim sup t→∞ f(t) ≥ lim sup m→∞ f(cm0 t0) ≥ f(t0) lim m→∞ rm =∞. 4. Conditions for the convergence to infinity of WPI and PI functions. In view of Lemma 3.1, a natural problem is to find conditions under which WPI functions tend to infinity. We discuss some appropriate conditions below. The following result does not require measurability of the function f . Proposition 4.1. Let f ∈ WPI and c0 > 1, t0 > 0, and r > 1 be the constants from inequality (3.1). If there exists a T0 ≥ t0 such that ε0 = inf T0≤θ≤c0T0 f(θ) > 0, (4.1) then f ∈ F∞. Proof. Inequality (3.2) implies that, for all t ≥ T0, f(t) ≥ f ( t c m(t) 0 ) rm(t), where m(t) = max {n ∈ N0 : cn0T0 ≤ t} . It is clear that m(t) is the integer part of logc0 (t/T0) and t c m(t) 0 ∈ [T0, c0T0] ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 1304 V. V. BULDYGIN, O. I. KLESOV, J. G. STEINEBACH for all t ≥ T0. Thus f(t) ≥ ε0rm(t), t ≥ T0. (4.2) Since limt→∞m(t) =∞ and r > 1, we have lim t→∞ rm(t) =∞. Taking condition (4.1) into account, we obtain lim inf t→∞ f(t) ≥ ε0 lim t→∞ rm(t) =∞. Remark 4.1. One can substitute any of the following two conditions for (4.1): (i) for all sufficiently large s > 0, there exists T = T (s) ≥ s, such that inf T≤t≤c0T f(t) > 0, (4.3) or (ii) lim inft→∞ f(t) > 0. Each of the latter two conditions implies condition (4.1) and thus is sufficient to show that a WPI function f tends to infinity. In turn, condition (4.3) holds if, for example, for all sufficiently large s > 0 there exists T ≥ s such that the positive function f is continuous on the interval [T, c0T ]. Remark 4.2. Inequality (4.2) shows that any WPI function cannot grow slower than a power function depending on the point T0 given in condition (4.1). Proposition 4.1 yields the following result. Corollary 4.1. Let f ∈ WPI. If there is a T > 0 such that f is continuous on the interval [T,∞), then f ∈ F∞. In fact, the function f in Corollary 4.1 belongs to PI. The following result treats this case, too. Theorem 4.1. If f ∈ ORV ∩ PI, then f ∈ F∞. Remark 4.3. Since ORV ∩PI = ORV ∩WPI, Theorem 4.1 means that the ORV property, like condition (4.1) in Proposition 4.1, is also an extra condition under which a WPI function tends to infinity. Note that the ORV property requires both the WORV condition (2.1) and measurability of the corresponding function. Remark 4.4. Since RV+ ⊂ ORV ∩PI, Theorem 4.1 implies that any RV function with positive index tends to infinity (see [6, 24]). We need an auxiliary result to prove Theorem 4.1. Lemma 4.1. Let f ∈ ORV ∩ PI. Then lim n→∞ f(antn) f(tn) =∞ (4.4) for all sequences of positive numbers {an} and {tn} such that lim n→∞ an =∞ and lim n→∞ tn =∞. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 ON THE CONVERGENCE TO INFINITY OF POSITIVE INCREASING FUNCTIONS 1305 Proof. Let {an} and {tn} be sequences of positive numbers such that limn→∞ an = = ∞ and limn→∞ tn = ∞. Moreover let c0 > 1, t0 > 0 and r > 1 be the constants from inequality (3.1) corresponding to the function f . Using {an} and c0, we construct a sequence {mn} ⊂ N such that, for some n0 ∈ N, cmn 0 ≤ an < cmn+1 0 , n ≥ n0. Since limn→∞ an =∞, we get limn→∞mn =∞. It is clear that, for all n ≥ 1, f(antn) f(tn) = f(antn) f(cmn 0 tn) mn∏ k=1 f(ck0tn) f(ck−10 tn) . This together with (3.1) implies that f(antn) f(tn) ≥ f(antn) f(cmn 0 tn) rmn for all large n. Since f ∈ ORV , the integral representation of ORV functions (see [1]) implies that there exist measurable bounded functions α and β such that f(t) = Φ(t) exp  t∫ t0 β(u) du u  (4.5) for all sufficiently large t, where Φ = exp ◦α. This, for sufficiently large n, implies that f(antn) f(cmn 0 tn) = Φ(antn) Φ(cmn 0 tn) exp  antn∫ cmn 0 tn β(u) du u  ≥ ≥ Φ(antn) Φ(cmn 0 tn) exp { −B ln ( an cmn 0 )} ≥ K c−B0 , where K = lim inft→∞Φ(t) 2 lim supt→∞Φ(t) > 0 and B = | inf t∈[t0,∞) β(t)| <∞. Therefore lim inf n→∞ f(antn) f(tn) ≥ ( K c−B0 ) lim inf n→∞ rmn =∞, whence relation (4.4) follows. Lemma 4.1 is proved. Proof of Theorem 4.1. Assume the converse, that is, let f(t) not tend to ∞ as t → ∞. Then there is a sequence of positive numbers {un} and a number p ∈ [0,∞) such that un →∞ and limn→∞ f(un) = p. If p ∈ (0,∞), there exists a sequence of natural numbers {nk} such that, with sk = unk , k ≥ 1, we have limk→∞ sk =∞ and ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 1306 V. V. BULDYGIN, O. I. KLESOV, J. G. STEINEBACH lim k→∞ sk+1/sk =∞ and lim k→∞ f(sk+1)/f(sk) = 1. If p = 0, there is a sequence of natural numbers {nk} such that, with sk = unk , k ≥ 1, we have limk→∞ sk =∞ and lim k→∞ sk+1/sk =∞ and lim k→∞ f(sk+1)/f(sk) = 0. In both cases, this is a contradiction to Lemma 4.1, which completes the proof of f ∈ F∞. 5. Counterexamples. In this section, we discuss two examples highlighting the sufficiency conditions of our preceding results. 5.1. Measurability. Analyzing the proof of Theorem 4.1, we see that the WORV condition (2.1) can be weakened. Indeed, Theorem 4.1 remains true for measurable functions f for which the integral representation (4.5) holds for sufficiently large t, where the measurable function α is bounded and the measurable function β is bounded from below and locally bounded from above. This rises the interesting question whether or not one can drop the measurability in Theorem 4.1 and instead add the following “one-sided” WORV condition to the WPI condition (2.3): f∗(c) > 0 for all c > 1, or, more stronger, f∗(c) > 1 for all c > 1 (implying the WPI condition (2.3)). The following result shows that this is not the case. Proposition 5.1. There exists a nonmeasurable function f ∈ F+ such that lim t→∞ f(ct) f(t) =∞ for all c > 1, (5.1) but lim inf t→∞ f(t) = 0. (5.2) Proof. Let H be the Hamel basis (see, for example, [16, 6]), that is, a set of real numbers such that every real number x 6= 0 can uniquely be represented as a finite linear combination of elements of H with rational coefficients, i.e., x = n(x)∑ i=1 ri(x)bi(x), where n(x) ∈ N, ri(x) ∈ Q \ {0} and bi(x) ∈ H. Note that (n(x), x ∈ R) is a nonmeasurable and subadditive function, that is n(x+ y) ≤ n(x) + n(y) for all x, y ∈ R, (5.3) (see, for example, [6] or [22]). Moreover, for all fixed n ≥ 1 and all fixed, but different b1, . . . , bn ∈ H, ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 ON THE CONVERGENCE TO INFINITY OF POSITIVE INCREASING FUNCTIONS 1307 the set Mn = { n∑ i=1 ribi; r1, . . . , rn ∈ Q \ {0} } is dense in R. (5.4) Let h(x) = x2 − n(x), x > 0, and f(t) = exp{h(ln t)}, t > 0. It is clear that f ∈ F+. Moreover, inequality (5.3) implies that h(x+ u)− h(x) = 2xu+ u2 − (n(x+ u)− n(x)) ≥ 2xu− n(u) for all x > 0 and u > 0. Hence limx→∞ ( h(x+ u)− h(x) ) =∞ for all u > 0. This implies that lim t→∞ f(ct) f(t) = lim t→∞ exp{h(ln t+ ln c)− h(ln t)} = = exp { lim t→∞ (h(ln t+ ln c)− h(ln t)) } =∞ for all c > 1. This proves relation (5.1). On the other hand, according to (5.4), there exists a sequence {xk} such that xk ∈ (k − 1, k) ∩Mk3 , k ≥ 1. It is clear that h(xk) < k2 − n(xk) = k2 − k3 for all k ≥ 1, whence lim inf x→∞ h(x) = −∞. This implies (5.2) and thus completes the proof of Proposition 5.1. 5.2. Upper limit functions. The sufficient condition of Theorem 4.1 for f ∈ F∞ is expressed in terms of the lower limit function f∗. Note that the upper limit function, in turn, is not an appropriate tool here. The following example exhibits a bounded measurable function f such that f∗(c) = ∞ for all c > 0. One may compare this function with g(x) = ex for which the upper limit function is nearly the same, i.e., g∗(c) =∞ for c > 1, but g grows to infinity very fast. Example 5.1. Let B = {1!, 2!, 3!, . . . } and A = R+ \B. Put f(t) = 1IA(t) + ∞∑ n=1 1 n 1I{n!}(t). In other words, f(t) = 1, t ∈ A, 1 n , t = n! for some n. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10 1308 V. V. BULDYGIN, O. I. KLESOV, J. G. STEINEBACH For any c > 0, the case where both ct = n! and t = m! does not occur if t is sufficiently large. Then, for c > 0 and sufficiently large t, f(ct) f(t) =  1, ct ∈ A, t ∈ A, 1 n , ct = n! for some n, but t ∈ A, n, ct ∈ A, but t = n! for some n. Therefore f∗(c) = 0 and f∗(c) =∞ for all c > 0. However 0 < f(t) ≤ 1. 1. Aljančić S., Arandelović D. O-regularly varying functions // Publ. Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N.S.). – 1977. – 22(36). – P. 5 – 22. 2. Arandelović D. O-regular variation and uniform convergence // Ibid. – 1990. – 48(62). – P. 25 – 40. 3. Avakumović V. G. Über einen O-Inversionssatz // Bull. Int. Acad. Youg. Sci. – 1936. – 29 – 30. – P. 107 – 117. 4. Bari N. K., Stechkin S. B. Best approximation and differential properties of two conjugate functions // Trudy Mosk. Mat. Obsch. – 1956. – 5. – S. 483 – 522 (in Russian). 5. Bingham N. H., Goldie C. M. Extensions of regular variation, I, II // Proc. London Math. Soc. – 1982. – 44. – P. 473 – 534. 6. Bingham N. H., Goldie C. M., Teugels J. L. Regular variation. – Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987. 7. Buldygin V. V., Klesov O. I., Steinebach J. G. Properties of a subclass of Avakumović functions and their generalized inverses // Ukr. Math. J. – 2002. – 54, № 2. – P. 179 – 206. 8. Buldygin V. V., Klesov O. I., Steinebach J. G. Some properties of asymptotically quasi-inverse functions and their applications. I // Theory Probab. and Math. Statist. – 2005. – 70. – P. 11 – 28. 9. Buldygin V. V., Klesov O. I., Steinebach J. G. On some properties of asymptotically quasi-inverse functions and their applications. II // Ibid. – 2005. – 71. – P. 37 – 52. 10. Buldygin V. V., Klesov O. I., Steinebach J. G. PRV property and the asymptotic behaviour of solutions of stochastic differential equations // Theory Stochast. Process. – 2005. – 11(27). – P. 42 – 57. 11. Buldygin V. V., Klesov O. I., Steinebach J. G. On some properties of asymptotically quasi-inverse functions // Theory Probab. and Math. Statist. – 2008. – 77. – P. 15 – 30. 12. Buldygin V. V., Klesov O. I., Steinebach J. G. PRV property and the ϕ-asymptotic behavior of solutions of stochastic differential equations // Liet. Mat. Rink. – 2007. – 47, № 4. – P. 445 – 465. 13. Djurčić D., Torgašev A. Strong asymptotic equivalence and inversion of functions in the class K // J. Math. Anal. and Appl. – 2001. – 255. – P. 383 – 390. 14. Feller W. One-sided analogues of Karamata’s regular variation // L’Enseignement Math. – 1969. – 15. – P. 107 – 121. 15. Gihman I. I., Skorohod A. V. Stochastic differential equations. – Berlin etc.: Springer, 1972. 16. Greub W. Linear algebra. – 4th ed. – Berlin etc.: Springer, 1975. 17. de Haan L., Stadtmüller U. Dominated variation and related concepts and Tauberian theorems for Laplace transformations // J. Math. Anal. and Appl. – 1985. – 108. – P. 344 – 365. 18. Karamata J. Sur un mode de croissance régulière des fonctions // Mathematica (Cluj). – 1930. – 4. – P. 38 – 53. 19. Karamata J. Sur un mode de croissance régulière. Théoremès fondamentaux // Bull. Soc. Math. France. – 1933. – 61. – P. 55 – 62. 20. Karamata J. Bemerkung über die vorstehende Arbeit des Herrn Avakumović, mit näherer Betrachtung einer Klasse von Funktionen, welche bei den Inversionssätzen vorkommen // Bull. Int. Acad. Youg. Sci. – 1936. – 29 – 30. – P. 117 – 123. 21. Keller G., Kersting G., Rösler U. On the asymptotic behaviour of solutions of stochastic differential equations // Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor. und verw. Geb. – 1984. – 68. – S. 163 – 184. 22. Korevaar J., van Aardenne-Ehrenfest T., de Bruijn N. G. A note on slowly oscillating functions // Nieuw arch. wisk. – 1949. – 23. – P. 77 – 86. 23. Rogozin B. A. A Tauberian theorem for increasing functions of dominated variation // Sib. Math. J. – 2002. – 43. – P. 353 – 356. 24. Seneta E. Regularly varying functions. – Berlin etc.: Springer, 1976. 25. Yakymiv A. L. Asymptotics properties of the state change points in a random record process // Theory Probab. and Appl. – 1987. – 31. – P. 508 – 512. Received 14.10.09, after revision — 30.07.10 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2010, т. 62, № 10
id umjimathkievua-article-2956
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:33:31Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/11/7d3125d688b0119ef5cf55d805473811.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-29562020-03-18T19:41:19Z On the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity Про збіжність до нескінченності додатно зростаючих функцій Buldygin, V. V. Klesov, O. I. Steinebach, J. G. Булдигін, В. В. Клесов, О. І. Штайнебах, Й. Г. We study the conditions of convergence to infinity for some classes of functions extending the well-known class of regularly varying (RV) functions, such as, e.g., $O$-regularly varying (ORV) functions or positive increasing (PI) functions. Досліджено умови збіжності до нескінченності деяких класів функцій, що розширюють відомий клас регулярно змінних функцій, таких, як, наприклад, $O$-регулярно змінних функцій або додатно змінних функцій. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2010-10-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2956 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 62 No. 10 (2010); 1299–1308 Український математичний журнал; Том 62 № 10 (2010); 1299–1308 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2956/2662 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2956/2663 Copyright (c) 2010 Buldygin V. V.; Klesov O. I.; Steinebach J. G.
spellingShingle Buldygin, V. V.
Klesov, O. I.
Steinebach, J. G.
Булдигін, В. В.
Клесов, О. І.
Штайнебах, Й. Г.
On the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity
title On the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity
title_alt Про збіжність до нескінченності додатно зростаючих функцій
title_full On the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity
title_fullStr On the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity
title_full_unstemmed On the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity
title_short On the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity
title_sort on the convergence of positive increasing functions to infinity
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2956
work_keys_str_mv AT buldyginvv ontheconvergenceofpositiveincreasingfunctionstoinfinity
AT klesovoi ontheconvergenceofpositiveincreasingfunctionstoinfinity
AT steinebachjg ontheconvergenceofpositiveincreasingfunctionstoinfinity
AT buldigínvv ontheconvergenceofpositiveincreasingfunctionstoinfinity
AT klesovoí ontheconvergenceofpositiveincreasingfunctionstoinfinity
AT štajnebahjg ontheconvergenceofpositiveincreasingfunctionstoinfinity
AT buldyginvv prozbížnístʹdoneskínčennostídodatnozrostaûčihfunkcíj
AT klesovoi prozbížnístʹdoneskínčennostídodatnozrostaûčihfunkcíj
AT steinebachjg prozbížnístʹdoneskínčennostídodatnozrostaûčihfunkcíj
AT buldigínvv prozbížnístʹdoneskínčennostídodatnozrostaûčihfunkcíj
AT klesovoí prozbížnístʹdoneskínčennostídodatnozrostaûčihfunkcíj
AT štajnebahjg prozbížnístʹdoneskínčennostídodatnozrostaûčihfunkcíj