2-Simple ore domains of stable rank 1

It is known that a simple Bézout domain is a domain of elementary divisors if and only if it is 2-simple. We prove that, over a 2-simple Ore domain of stable rank 1, an arbitrary matrix that is not a divisor of zero is equivalent to a canonical diagonal matrix.

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2010
Автори: Domsha, O.V., Zabavskii, B. V., Домша, О. В., Забавський, Б. В.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Українська
Англійська
Опубліковано: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2010
Онлайн доступ:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2968
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860508974936227840
author Domsha, O.V.
Zabavskii, B. V.
Домша, О. В.
Забавський, Б. В.
author_facet Domsha, O.V.
Zabavskii, B. V.
Домша, О. В.
Забавський, Б. В.
author_sort Domsha, O.V.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T19:41:19Z
description It is known that a simple Bézout domain is a domain of elementary divisors if and only if it is 2-simple. We prove that, over a 2-simple Ore domain of stable rank 1, an arbitrary matrix that is not a divisor of zero is equivalent to a canonical diagonal matrix.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:33:44Z
format Article
fulltext UDK 512.552.12 O. V. Domßa, B. V. Zabavs\kyj (L\viv. nac. un-t im. I. Franka) 2-PROSTI OBLASTI ORE STABIL|NOHO RANHU 1 It is known that the simple Bezout domain is a domain of elementary divisors if and only if it is 2-simple domain. We prove that, over the 2-simple Ore domain of stable rank 1, an arbitrary matrix that is not a divizor of zero is equivalent to a canonical diagonal matrix. Yzvestno, çto prostaq oblast\ Bezu qvlqetsq oblast\g πlementarn¥x delytelej tohda y tol\- ko tohda, kohda ona 2-prostaq. V rabote dokazano, çto nad 2-prostoj oblast\g Orπ stabyl\noho ranha 1 proyzvol\naq matryca, ne qvlqgwaqsq delytelem nulq, πkvyvalentna kanonyçeskoj dyahonal\noj matryce. Zadaça pro diahonalizacig matryc\ nad kil\cqmy [ klasyçnog. }] prototypom [ teorema Haussa pro ekvivalentnist\ matryci nad polem diahonal\nij matryci z odynycqmy ta nulqmy na holovnij diahonali. Perßi rezul\taty takoho typu wodo cilyx çysel buly otrymani v 1861 r. H.:Smitom [1]. Vin doviv, wo koΩna matrycq z ciloçyslovymy elementamy ßlqxom elementarnyx peretvoren\ rqd- kiv i stovpciv zvodyt\sq do diahonal\noho vyhlqdu, do toho Ω koΩen diahonal\- nyj element [ dil\nykom nastupnoho. Pizniße teoremu Smita bulo poßyreno na rizni klasy kilec\. Tak, Dikson [2], Vedderbarn [3], van der Varden [4] i DΩekob- son [5] poßyryly danu teoremu na rizni klasy komutatyvnyx i nekomutatyvnyx kilec\, a Tejxmgller [6] oderΩav povnyj rozv’qzok dlq nekomutatyvnyx ob- lastej holovnyx idealiv (a v inßomu formulgvanni — Asano [7]). Vsi ci rezul\taty spryqly vvedenng Kaplans\kym ponqttq kil\cq elemen- tarnyx dil\nykiv. Nahada[mo, wo matrycq nad asociatyvnym kil\cem z odynyceg ma[ kanoniçnu diahonal\nu redukcig, qkwo ]] moΩna zvesty do diahonal\noho vyhlqdu ßlqxom domnoΩennq zliva i sprava na deqki oberneni matryci vidpovid- nyx rozmiriv, i pry c\omu koΩen diahonal\nyj element [ povnym dil\nykom na- stupnoho. Qkwo koΩna matrycq nad kil\cem ma[ kanoniçnu diahonal\nu reduk- cig, to take kil\ce nazyva[t\sq kil\cem elementarnyx dil\nykiv [8]. Qkwo doslidΩennq komutatyvnyx kilec\ elementarnyx dil\nykiv velysq dosyt\ systematyçno [9 – 12], to nekomutatyvni kil\cq elementarnyx dil\nykiv doslidΩuvalysq frahmentarno [13, 14]. Krim navedenyx rezul\tativ vartyj uva- hy rezul\tat Kona [15], qkyj doviv, wo prava holovna oblast\ Bezu [ kil\cem elementarnyx dil\nykiv. U roboti [16] pobudovano pryklad tako] oblasti Bezu, pryçomu zauvaΩymo, wo ce pryklad prosto] oblasti Bezu. Sered najnovißyx re- zul\tativ varto vidmityty [17], de pokazano, wo prosta oblast\ Bezu [ oblastg elementarnyx dil\nykiv todi i til\ky todi, koly vona [ 2-prostog. Odnym iz novyx ponqt\, qke vvijßlo v teorig kilec\ z K-teori] i vyqvylos\ korysnym pry rozv’qzanni nyzky vidkrytyx zadaç teori] kilec\, [ ponqttq sta- bil\noho ranhu kil\cq. Zokrema, dovedeno, wo stabil\nyj ranh kil\cq elemen- tarnyx dil\nykiv ne perevywu[ 2 [18]. OtΩe, nexaj R — prosta oblast\. Todi dlq dovil\noho nenul\ovoho elemen- ta a R∈ otryma[mo R a R = R, tobto isnugt\ elementy u1 , u un2, ,… ; v1 , v v2, ,… n ∈ R taki, wo u a1 1v + u a2 2v + … + u an nv = 1. Qkwo dlq koΩnoho nenul\ovoho elementa a R∈ isnu[ natural\ne çyslo n ta- ke, wo u a1 1v + … + u an nv = 1, do toho Ω çyslo n [ najmenßym z usix moΩly- vyx, to oblast\ R nazyva[t\sq n-prostog. Zokrema, oblast\ R [ 2-prostog todi i til\ky todi, koly dlq dovil\noho nenul\ovoho elementa a R∈ isnugt\ © O. V. DOMÍA, B. V. ZABAVS|KYJ, 2010 1436 ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2010, t. 62, # 10 2-PROSTI OBLASTI ORE STABIL|NOHO RANHU 1 1437 elementy u1 , u2 ; v1 , v2 ∈ R taki, wo u a1 1v + u a2 2v = 1. Prykladom 2-prosto] oblasti Ore [ kil\ce vid n-dyferencigvan\ [19]. TverdΩennq 1. Nexaj R — 2-prosta oblast\. Todi dlq dovil\nyx nenul\o- vyx elementiv a, b R∈ isnugt\ elementy u1 , u2 ; v1 , v2 ∈ R taki, wo u a1 1v + u b2 2v = 1. Dovedennq. Za umovog teoremy elementy a, b [ nenul\ovymy i R — ob- last\, todi ab ≠ 0 i RabR = R . Oskil\ky R [ 2-prostog oblastg, to isnugt\ elementy x1, x2 ; y1 , y R2 ∈ taki, wo x aby1 1 + x aby2 2 = 1. Poklademo x u1 1= , by1 1= v , x a u2 2= , y u2 2= i otryma[mo u a1 1v + u b2 2v = 1, wo j potribno bulo dovesty. Poznaçymo çerez U R( ) hrupu obernenyx elementiv oblasti R . Nahada[mo, wo kil\ce R [ kil\cem stabil\noho ranhu 1, qkwo z toho, wo aR + bR = R dlq dovil\nyx elementiv a, b R∈ , vyplyva[ isnuvannq elementiv t R∈ i u U R∈ ( ) takyx, wo a + bt = u [20]. TverdΩennq 2. Nexaj R — 2-prosta oblast\ stabil\noho ranhu 1. Todi dlq dovil\nyx nenul\ovyx elementiv a , b R∈ isnugt\ elementy α , β ∈ R i obernenyj element w U R∈ ( ) taki, wo aα + w bβ = 1. Dovedennq. Oskil\ky R — 2-prosta oblast\, to zhidno z tverdΩennqm:1 dlq dovil\nyx nenul\ovyx elementiv a, b R∈ isnugt\ taki elementy u1 , u2 ; v1 , v2 ∈ R , wo u a1 1v + u a2 2v = 1, zvidky u aR1 + u aR2 = R . Oskil\ky R — oblast\ stabil\noho ranhu 1, to isnu[ takyj element x R∈ , dlq qkoho u a1 + u bx2 ∈ U R( ). Zvidsy Ra + R bx = R . Z toho, wo R — oblast\ stabil\noho ranhu 1, otrymu[mo a + y bx = u ∈ U R( ) dlq deqkoho elementa y R∈ . OtΩe, a R + bR = R . Znovu Ω z toho, wo R — oblast\ stabil\noho ranhu 1, ma[mo as + y = w ∈ U R( ) dlq deqkoho elementa s R∈ . Zvidsy y = w – a s. ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2010, t. 62, # 10 1438 O. V. DOMÍA, B. V. ZABAVS|KYJ Todi rivnist\ a + y bx = u pry otrymanomu y nabere vyhlqdu a + w bx – a sbx = a (1 – sbx) + w bx = u. Zvidsy oderΩymo a sbx u( )1 1− − + wbxu−1 = 1, tobto aα + w bβ = 1 dlq deqkyx elementiv α, β ∈ R i obernenoho elementa w U R∈ ( ). Oznaçennq 1 [21]. Oblast\ R nazyva[t\sq pravog (livog) oblastg Ore, qkwo dlq dovil\nyx nenul\ovyx elementiv a , b R∈ aR bR∩ ≠ 0 ( Ra Rb∩ ≠ ≠ 0{ } ). Oblast\ Ore — ce oblast\, qka [ pravog i livog oblastg Ore odno- çasno. Oznaçennq 2 [21]. Matryci A i B nazvemo ekvivalentnymy nad oblastg R, qkwo isnugt\ oberneni matryci P i Q nad R vidpovidnyx rozmiriv taki, wo B = PA Q. Dovedemo nastupne tverdΩennq. TverdΩennq 3. Nexaj R — 2-prosta oblast\ Ore stabil\noho ranhu 1. Todi dlq koΩno] matryci A aij= ( ) druhoho porqdku, qka ne [ dil\nykom nulq, isnugt\ rqdok ( , )1 u i stovpçyk e f     taki, wo ( , )1 u A e f     = 1, de e, f R∈ , u U R∈ ( ). Dovedennq. Oskil\ky R — oblast\ Ore i matrycq A ne [ dil\nykom nulq, to lehko baçyty, wo isnu[ matrycq D nad R porqdku 2, qka takoΩ ne [ dil\nykom nulq, taka, wo vykonu[t\sq rivnist\ A D = d d 1 2 0 0     , de d1 0≠ , d2 0≠ . Zhidno z tverdΩennqm:2 dlq elementiv d1 , d2 isnugt\ elementy u, c, d, do toho Ω u — obernenyj element, taki, wo vykonu[t\sq rivnist\ d c d d1 2 1+ = . Todi ( )1 a AD c d     = ( )1 0 0 1 2 u d d c d         = 1. Poklademo D c d     = e f     , ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2010, t. 62, # 10 2-PROSTI OBLASTI ORE STABIL|NOHO RANHU 1 1439 wo dovodyt\ dane tverdΩennq. Teorema 1. Nexaj R — 2-prosta oblast\ Ore stabil\noho ranhu 1. Todi dlq dovil\no] matryci A porqdku n, qka ne [ dil\nykom nulq, isnugt\ taki oberneni matryci P, Q vidpovidnyx rozmiriv, wo PAQ = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 … … � … … ∆                   . Dovedennq provodymo metodom matematyçno] indukci]. Rozhlqnemo vypadok n = 2. Zhidno z tverdΩennqm:3 dlq matryci A isnugt\ elementy u, e, f R∈ , do toho Ω u — obernenyj element, taki, wo ( )1 u A e f     = 1. Oçevydno, wo R e + R f = R . Oskil\ky R — oblast\ stabil\noho ranhu 1, to, vra- xovugçy [5], rqdok ( )1 u i stovpçyk e f     moΩna dopovnyty do obernenyx matryc\ P i Q vidpovidno. Zvidsy PAQ = 1 ∗ ∗ ∗     . Oçevydno, wo elementarnymy peretvorennqmy rqdkiv i stovpçykiv matrycq PAQ zvodyt\sq do vyhlqdu 1 0 0 ∆     . Ce oznaça[, wo dlq matryci A isnugt\ taki matryci S i T, wo SA T = 1 0 0 δ     . Nexaj n = 3, tobto matrycq A = ( )aij [ matryceg tret\oho porqdku. Bez obme- Ωennq zahal\nosti moΩna vvaΩaty, wo pidmatrycq a a a a 11 12 21 22     matryci A ne [ dil\nykom nulq. Todi zhidno z tverdΩennqm:3 vykonu[t\sq rivnist\ 1 0 1 13 23 13 23u A e e a ua f f a ua( ) − + − +           ( ) ( ) = 1. ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2010, t. 62, # 10 1440 O. V. DOMÍA, B. V. ZABAVS|KYJ Oçevydno, wo rqdok 1 0u( ) moΩna dopovnyty do oberneno] matryci P. ZauvaΩymo, wo R e e a ua− +( )( )13 23 + R f f a ua− +( )( )13 23 = R . Oskil\ky R — oblast\ stabil\noho ranhu 1, to zhidno z [18] stovpçyk e e a ua f f a ua − + − +           ( ) ( ) 13 23 13 23 1 moΩna dopovnyty do oberneno] matryci Q. Zvidsy PA Q = 1 12 13 21 22 23 31 32 33 ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ ′ ′           a a a a a a a a .. Oçevydno, wo matrycq PA Q elementarnymy peretvorennqmy rqdkiv i stovpçy- kiv zvodyt\sq do vyhlqdu 1 0 0 0 0 a b c d           . Oskil\ky A ne [ dil\nykom nulq, to matrycq a b c d     teΩ ne [ dil\nykom nulq, a otΩe, za dovedenym vywe, zvodyt\sq do vyhlqdu 1 0 0 ∆     . Todi matrycq A zvodyt\sq do vyhlqdu 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ∆           , wo j potribno bulo dovesty. Indukciq za rozmiramy matryci zaverßu[ dovedennq. 1. Smith H. J. S. On systems of linear indeterminate equations and congruences // Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. – 1861. – 151, # 2. – P. 293 – 326. 2. Dickson L. E. Algebras and their arithmetics. – Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1923. 3. Wedderburn J. H. M. Non-commutative domains of integrity // J. reine und angew. Math. – 1932.– 167, # 1. – S. 129 – 141. 4. Van der Warden B. L. Moderne algebra. – Berlin; New York: Springer, 1930. 5. Jacobson N. Pseudo-linear transformation // Ann. Math. – 1937. – # 38. – P. 484 – 507. 6. Teichmuller O. Der Elementarteilsatz für neichtkommutative Ringe // Abh. Preuss. Acad. Wiss. Phys.-Math. K 1. – 1937. – S. 169 – 177. ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2010, t. 62, # 10 7. Asano K. Neichtkommutative Hauptidealringe // Acta. Sci. – Paris: Hermann, 1938. – Ind. 696. 8. Kaplansky I. Elementary divisors and modules // Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. – 1949. – 66. – P. 464 – 491. 9. Gerstein L. A local to approach to matrix equivalence // Linear Algebra and Appl. – 1977. – 16. – P. 221 – 232. 10. Gillman L., Henricsen M. Some remarks about elementary divisor rings // Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. – 1956. – 82. – P. 362 – 365. 11. Henricsen M., Jerison M. The space of minimal primes of a commutative ring // Ibid. – 1965.– 115. – P. 110 – 130. 12. Lam T. Y. A crash course on stable range, cancellation, substitution and exchange. – Berkeley CA: Univ. California, 1972. 13. Zabavskyj B. V. O nekomutatyvn¥x kol\cax s πlementarn¥my delytelqmy // Ukr. mat. Ωurn. – 1990. – 42, # 6. – S. 847 – 850. 14. Zabavsky B. V. Diagonalization of matrices // Mat. stud. – 2005. – 23, # 1. – S. 3 – 10. 15. Cohn P. M. On the structure of the GL2 of a ring // Publ. Math. I.H.E.S. – 1966. – # 30. – P. 5 – 59. 16. Cohn P. M. Rings of a transfinite weak algorithm // Bull. London Math. Soc. – 1969. – # 1. – P. 55 – 59. 17. Zabavskyj B. V. Prost¥e kol\ca πlementarn¥x delytelej // Mat. stud. – 2004. – 22, # 2. – S. 129 – 133. 18. Zabavsky B. V. Diagonalizability theorem for matrices over ring with finite stable range // Algebra and Discrete Math. – 2005. – # 1. – P. 134 – 148. 19. Olszewski J. On ideals of product of rings // Demonstr. math. – 1994. – 27, # 1. – P. 1 – 7. 20. Vaserstein L. N. The stable rank of rings and dimensionality of topological spaces // Funct. Anal. and Appl. – 1971. – N 5. – P. 102 – 110. 21. Kon P. Svobodn¥e kol\ca y yx svqzy. – M.: Myr, 1976. OderΩano 22.06.09, pislq doopracgvannq — 23.07.10
id umjimathkievua-article-2968
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language Ukrainian
English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:33:44Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/2b/7c3cc35b385c10fab70fada8413da82b.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-29682020-03-18T19:41:19Z 2-Simple ore domains of stable rank 1 2-Прості області Оре стабільного рангу 1 Domsha, O.V. Zabavskii, B. V. Домша, О. В. Забавський, Б. В. It is known that a simple Bézout domain is a domain of elementary divisors if and only if it is 2-simple. We prove that, over a 2-simple Ore domain of stable rank 1, an arbitrary matrix that is not a divisor of zero is equivalent to a canonical diagonal matrix. Известно, ч то простая область Безу является областью элементарных делителей тогда и только тогда, когда она 2-простая. В работе доказано, что над 2-просгой областью Орэ стабильного ранга 1 произвольная матрица, не являющаяся делителем нуля, эквивалентна канонической диагональной матрице. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2010-10-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2968 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 62 No. 10 (2010); 1436–1440 Український математичний журнал; Том 62 № 10 (2010); 1436–1440 1027-3190 uk en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2968/2686 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2968/2687 Copyright (c) 2010 Domsha O.V.; Zabavskii B. V.
spellingShingle Domsha, O.V.
Zabavskii, B. V.
Домша, О. В.
Забавський, Б. В.
2-Simple ore domains of stable rank 1
title 2-Simple ore domains of stable rank 1
title_alt 2-Прості області Оре стабільного рангу 1
title_full 2-Simple ore domains of stable rank 1
title_fullStr 2-Simple ore domains of stable rank 1
title_full_unstemmed 2-Simple ore domains of stable rank 1
title_short 2-Simple ore domains of stable rank 1
title_sort 2-simple ore domains of stable rank 1
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/2968
work_keys_str_mv AT domshaov 2simpleoredomainsofstablerank1
AT zabavskiibv 2simpleoredomainsofstablerank1
AT domšaov 2simpleoredomainsofstablerank1
AT zabavsʹkijbv 2simpleoredomainsofstablerank1
AT domshaov 2prostíoblastíorestabílʹnogorangu1
AT zabavskiibv 2prostíoblastíorestabílʹnogorangu1
AT domšaov 2prostíoblastíorestabílʹnogorangu1
AT zabavsʹkijbv 2prostíoblastíorestabílʹnogorangu1