Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces

A boundedness result is established for multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces. As applications, two corollaries about interesting cases of the boundedness of the considered operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces are obtained.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2009
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Jianglong, Ву, Янглонг
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2009
Online Zugang:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3112
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Institution

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860509146388889600
author Wu, Jianglong
Ву, Янглонг
author_facet Wu, Jianglong
Ву, Янглонг
author_sort Wu, Jianglong
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T19:45:28Z
description A boundedness result is established for multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces. As applications, two corollaries about interesting cases of the boundedness of the considered operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces are obtained.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:36:28Z
format Article
fulltext K O R O T K I P O V I D O M L E N N Q UDC 517.9 Jianglong Wu (Mudanjiang Teachers College, China) BOUNDEDNESS OF MULTILINEAR SINGULAR INTEGRAL OPERATORS ON THE HOMOGENEOUS MORREY – HERZ SPACES OBMEÛENIST| BAHATOLINIJNYX SYNHULQRNYX INTEHRAL|NYX OPERATORIV NA ODNORIDNYX PROSTORAX MORREQ – HERCA A boundedness result is established for the multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey – Herz spaces. As applications, two corollaries about interesting cases of the boundedness of considered operators on the homogeneous Morrey – Herz spaces are obtained. Vstanovleno obmeΩenist\ bahatolinijnyx synhulqrnyx intehral\nyx operatoriv na odnoridnyx prostorax Morreq – Herca. Qk zastosuvannq, oderΩano dva naslidky pro cikavi vypadky obme- Ωenosti rozhlqduvanyx operatoriv na odnoridnyx prostorax Morreq – Herca. 1. Introduction and main results. Let Rn , n ≥ 1, be the n-dimensional Euclidean space and let Sn−1 be the unit sphere in Rn equipped with normalized Lebesgue measure d d xσ σ= ′( ) . Let Ω be a homogeneous function of degree zero on Rn and Ω ∈ −L Sr n( )1 for some r ∈ ∞[ ]1, , and Ω( ) ( )′ ′−∫ x d x Sn σ1 = 0, where ′x = = x x −1 for any x ≠ 0. If f Lq n∈ ω ( )R , that is f f x x dxL q q q n n ω ω( ) / ( ) ( )R R =       < ∞∫ 1 . The Calderón – Zygmund singular integral operator T is defined by T f x y y f x y dy n n ( ) . . ( ) ( )= ′ −∫p v Ω R , and the truncated maximal operator T ∗ is defined by T f x y y f x y dy n x y ∗ > − > = ′ −∫( ) sup ( ) ( ) ε ε0 Ω , where ′ = −y y y 1 ∈ Sn − 1 and f C n∈ ∞ 0 ( )R . © JIANGLONG WU, 2009 1434 ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2009, t. 61, # 10 BOUNDEDNESS OF MULTILINEAR SINGULAR … 1435 In 1971, Muckenhoupt and Wheeden [1] proved that if Ω( ) ( )′ ∈ −x L Sr n 1 , r > 1, then the operators T and T ∗ are bounded on L x q n β ( )R , 1 < q < ∞, provided that β be in the interval max (−( n , − − − ′)1 1( ) /n q r , min ( )n q −( 1 , q – 1 + (n – 1) q r/ )′ ) . Here and in the following, ′r denotes the dual exponent of r, i. e., ′r = r r/( )− 1 , and L x q n β ( )R denotes the weighted Lebesgue space. For general Aq weights, Duoandikoetxea [2] gave the weighted Lq , 1 < q < ∞, boundedness of T and T ∗ . The purpose of this paper is to consider the boundedness on homogeneous Morrey – Herz spaces for the multilinear singular integral operators TA m, and TA m, ∗ which are defined as follows, T f x R A x y x y x y f yA m m n m n , ( ) . ( ; , ) ( ) ( )= − − + +∫p. v 1 R Ω ddy , T f x R A x y x y x y A m m x y n, ( ) sup ( ; , ) ( )∗ > + − > = − −∫ ε ε0 1 Ω ++ m f y dy( ) , where m is positive integer, A has derivatives of order m in BMO( )Rn , R Am + 1( ; x, y) denotes the ( )m + 1 -th Taylor series remainder of A at x about y, that is R A x y A x D A y x ym m + ≤ = − −∑1 1 ( ; , ) ( ) ! ( ) ( ) µ µ µ µ , and f C n∈ ∞ 0 ( )R . Let B Bk k= ( , )0 2 = x n∈{ R : x k≤ }2 and C B Bk k k= −\ 1 for k ∈ Z . Let χ χk Ck = for k ∈ Z be the characteristic function of the set Ck . Definition 1 [3]. Let α ∈ R , 0 < p ≤ ∞, 0 < q < ∞ and λ ≥ 0. The homoge- neous Morrey – Herz spaces MK p q n� , , ( )α λ R are defined by MK f L fp q n q n MK p q n � �, , (( ) \ : , , α λ α λR R R= ∈ { }( )loc 0 )) < ∞{ } , where f fMK k k k p k L p k p q n q n� , , ( ) ( ) supα λ λ α χR Z R = ∈ − =0 02 2 −−∞ ∑       k p 0 1/ with the usual modifications made when p = ∞. Now, let us state the main results of this paper. Theorem 1. Let R A x ym + 1( ; , ) and A be defined as above, r ≥ 1, m ∈ N , λ ≥ ≥ 0, 0 < p ≤ ∞, 1 < q < ∞, max /− +( n q λ , − − − ′ + )1 1/ ( )/q n r λ < α < < min ( / )n q1 1−( + λ , 1 – 1 1/ ( )/q n r+ − ′ + )λ . And let �Ω be a homogeneous function of degree zero on Rn with �Ω ∈ −L L Sr n(ln ) ( )1 , that is ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2009, t. 61, # 10 1436 JIANGLONG WU � �Ω Ω( ) ln ( ) ( )′ + ′( ) ′ < ∞ − ∫ x x d x S r n 1 2 σ . If a sublinear operator �Tb m, is bounded on Lq n( )R and there is a constant C inde- pendent of f such that � � T f x C x y x y R A x y f y dyb m n m m n , ( ) ( ) ( ; , ) ( )≤ − − + + Ω 1 R ∫∫ for any f L n∈ 1( )R with compact support and x f∉ supp , then �Tb m, is also bounded on MK p q n� , , ( )α λ R . Throughout this paper, C denotes the constants that are independent of the main parameters involved but whose value may differ from line to line. 2. Proof of Theorem 1. Let Ω be a homogeneous function of degree zero on Rn and Ω ∈ −L Sr n( )1 for some r ∈ ∞[ ]1, . The truncated operator St b; , Ω is de- fined by S f x t x y x y R A x y f y dyt A n m m x ; , ( ) ( ) ( ; , ) ( )Ω Ω = − − − + − 1 yy t< ∫ . In this section we give two lemmas which are the key to the proof of Theorem 1. Lemma 1 [4]. Let A x( ) be a function on Rn with derivatives of order m in Lr n( )R for some r n∈ ∞( ], . Then R A x y C x y x y D A z dzm m n m r x y ( ; , ) ( , ) ( ), ( , ) ≤ −   ∫ 1 Ω Ω µ     = ∑ 1/r mµ , where Ω( , )x y is the cube centered at x with sides parallel to the coordinate axes and whose side length is 5 n x y− . Lemma 2 [5]. Let R A x ym + 1( ; , ) and A x( ) be defined as above. Let Ω ∈ ∈ L Sn∞ −( )1 be a homogeneous function of degree zero on Rn , m ∈ N , r ≥ 1, µ = m , 1 < q < ∞ and D A nµ ∈ BMO( )R . Set ξ ξ ξ ξΩ Ω Ω = > +       ≤         ∞inf : ln0 2 1r . If max ,− −( n 1 – (n – 1) q r/ ′) < β < min ( )n q −( 1 , q – 1 + (n – 1) q r/ ′) , then the trun- cated operator St A; , Ω is bounded on L x q n β ( )R with bound C D A nm µ µ ξ BMO( )R Ω=∑ . Here and in what follows, let f p denote f L Sp n( )− 1 . And without loss of ge- nerality, we may assume that D A nm µ µ BMO( )R=∑ = 1. Proof of Theorem 1. We choose α1 , α2 ∈ R , such that max /−( n q , – 1 / q – (n – – 1) / ′)r < α1/q < α – λ < α2 /q < min ( / )n q1 1−( , 1 – 1 / q + (n – 1) / ′)r . Write ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2009, t. 61, # 10 BOUNDEDNESS OF MULTILINEAR SINGULAR … 1437 f x f x x f xj j jj ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )= ≡ = −∞ ∞ = −∞ ∞ ∑∑ χ . Then, we have � � �T f TA m MK k k k p k A p q n, ( ) ( ) sup , ,α λ λ α χ R Z = ∈ − 0 02 2 ,, ( ) / ( )m L p k k p f q nR = −∞ ∑       0 1 ≤ ≤ C T f k k k p k A m j L j k q nsup ( ), ( ) 0 02 2 2 ∈ − = −∞ − ∑  Z R λ α χ �             = −∞ ∑ p k k p 0 1/ + + C T f k k k p k A m j L j k k q nsup ( ), ( ) 0 02 2 1 1 ∈ − = − + ∑ Z R λ α χ �              = −∞ ∑ p k k p 0 1/ + + C T f k k k p k A m j L j k q nsup ( ), ( ) 0 02 2 2∈ − = + ∞ ∑  Z R λ α χ �           = −∞ ∑ p k k p 0 1/ ≡ ≡ E E E1 2 3+ + . For E2 , by the Lq n( )R boundedness of �TA m, , we have E C f k k k p k j L j k k q n2 1 1 0 02 2≤     ∈ − = − + ∑sup ( )Z R λ α χ          = −∞ ∑ p k k p 0 1/ ≤ ≤ C f k k k p k L p k k p q nsup ( ) / 0 0 0 2 2 1 ∈ − = −∞ ∑       Z R λ α χ = = C f MK p q n� , , ( )α λ R . For E1 , note that when x Ck∈ , j ≤ k – 2, and y C j∈ , then 2 y x≤ . Therefo- re, for x Ck∈ , � � T f x C x y x y R A x y f y dyA m j n m m j, ( ) ( ) ( ; , ) ( )≤ − − + + Ω 1 RRn ∫ ≤ ≤ C x x y x y R A x y f y dy CS n m m j x y x �Ω( ) ( ; , ) ( ) − − ≤+ − ≤ ∫ 1 3 2 22 1k A jf x+ ; , ( )�Ω . Let F x Sn 0 1= ∈{ − : �Ω( )x ≤ 2} and F x Sd n= ∈{ − 1 : 2d < �Ω( )x ≤ 2 1d + } for positive integer d. Denote by �Ωd the restriction of �Ω on Fd . Then S f x S f xk k dA j A j d 2 2 0 1 1+ += = ∞ ∑; , ; ,( ) ( )� �Ω Ω . Thus, by Lemma 2 and the conditions in Theorem 1, we have ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2009, t. 61, # 10 1438 JIANGLONG WU S f S fk x q n k d x q nA j L A j L2 21 2 1 2 + +≤; , ( ) ; , ( � �Ω Ω α αR R ))d = ∞ ∑ 0 ≤ ≤ C f C f d x q n x q n d j L j L ξ α α Ω = ∞ ∑ ≤ 0 2 2 ( ) ( )R R . (1) In obtaining the last inequality, we use the fact that ξΩd C d ≤ = ∞∑ 0 . In fact, our hy- pothesis on �Ω now says that d d rd �Ω >∑ 0 < ∞. Set ξd = d d r �Ω + 2−d . It is obvious that � � � � Ω Ω Ω Ω d r d d d d r d r d dξ ξ ln ln2 22 1+       ≤ ( )∞ + ≤≤ C . This in turn implies that ξΩd ≤ C d d r d�Ω +( )−2 . Therefore, ξ ξ ξΩ Ω Ω Ω d d d d d r d d d C C d C C= + ≤ + + ≤ ≥ > > − > ∑ ∑ ∑� � 0 0 0 0 0 2∑∑ . Thus, by (1), it follows that E C T f k k k q p k A m j L x q1 0 0 2 2 2 2≤ ∈ − −sup ( )( / ) , Z λ α α χ α � (( ) / Rn j k p k k p = −∞ − = −∞ ∑∑               2 1 0 ≤ ≤ C S f k k k q p A j L k x q sup ( )( / ) ; , 0 0 2 1 2 2 2 2∈ − − + Z λ α α α �Ω (( ) / Rn j k p k k p = −∞ − = −∞ ∑∑                 2 1 0 ≤ ≤ C f k k k q p j L j k x q nsup ( / ) ( ) 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 ∈ − − = −∞ − ∑ Z R λ α α α              = −∞ ∑ p k k p 0 1/ ≤ ≤ C k k k p k k j ksup ( ) ( – / 0 0 0 22 2 2 ∈ − = −∞ − +∑    Z λ λ λ α α qq j j k ) − = −∞ − ∑     λ 2 × × 2 1 1 l p l L p l j p p p f q n α ( ) / / R = −∞ ∑               ≤ ≤ C f k k k p j k q j k Msup ( ) ( – / ) 0 0 22 2 2 2 ∈ − − + = −∞ − ∑ Z λ λ λ α α ��K p k k p p q n , , ( ) / α λ R              = −∞ ∑ 0 1 ≤ ≤ C f k k k p k k p MK p q sup / , , 0 0 0 2 2 1 ∈ − = −∞ ∑       Z λ λ α λ� (( )Rn ≤ ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2009, t. 61, # 10 BOUNDEDNESS OF MULTILINEAR SINGULAR … 1439 ≤ C f k k k MK p q nsup , , ( ) 0 0 02 2 ∈ − Z R λ λ α λ� = C f MK p q n� , , ( )α λ R . Now, let us turn to estimate for E3. Note that when x Ck∈ , j ≥ k + 2, and y C j∈ , then 2 x y≤ and � � T f x C x y x y R A x y f y dyA m j n m m j, ( ) ( ) ( ; , ) ( )≤ − − + + Ω 1 RRn ∫ ≤ ≤ C x y x y R A x y f y dyjn m x y m j j 2 2 1 1 − − ≤ + − −+ ∫ �Ω( ) ( ; , ) ( ) ≤≤ +CS f xj A j2 1; , ( )�Ω . Thus, by (1), similar to the proof of E1, we have E C T f k k k q p k A m j L x q3 0 0 1 1 2 2≤ ∈ − −sup ( )( / ) , Z λ α α χ α � (( ) / Rn j k p k k p = + ∞ = −∞ ∑∑              2 1 0 ≤ ≤ C S f k k k q p A j L j x q sup ( )( / ) ; , 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2∈ − − + Z λ α α α �Ω (( ) / Rn j k p k k p = + ∞ = −∞ ∑∑                2 1 0 ≤ ≤ C f k k k q p j L j k x q nsup ( )( / ) ( ) 0 0 1 1 2 2 2∈ − − = + ∞ Z R λ α α α ∑∑∑              = −∞ p k k p 0 1/ ≤ ≤ C k k k p k k k jsup ( ) ( / 0 0 0 12 2 2 ∈ − = −∞ − − −∑    Z λ λ α λ α qq j j k ) − = + ∞ ∑     λ 2 × × 2 1 1 l p l L p l j p p p f q n α ( ) / / R = −∞ ∑               ≤ ≤ C f k k k p k j q MK p q sup ( ) ( / ) , , 0 0 12 2 2 ∈ − − − − Z λ λ α λ α α λ� (( ) / Rn j k p k k p = + ∞ = −∞ ∑∑              2 1 0 ≤ ≤ C f k k k p k k p MK p q sup / , , 0 0 0 2 2 1 ∈ − = −∞ ∑       Z λ λ α λ� (( )Rn ≤ ≤ C f k k k MK p q nsup , , ( ) 0 0 02 2 ∈ − Z R λ λ α λ� = C f MK p q n� , , ( )α λ R . Therefore, Theorem 1 is proved. 3. Corollary. The above proof of Theorem 1 also indicates that the boundedness of operator �TA m, on Lebesgue spaces with power weights implies its boundedness on homogeneous Morrey – Herz spaces. Similar result is proved by Lu and Xu in [3]. ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2009, t. 61, # 10 1440 JIANGLONG WU The following lemma for the boundedness of operators TA m, and TA m, ∗ on the Lebesgue spaces with power weights can be found in [5]. Lemma 3 [5]. Let R A x ym + 1( ; , ) and A be defined as above, m ∈ N , r > 1, and Ω ∈ L L Sr n(ln ) ( )− 1 . If max −( n , – 1 – (n – 1) q / ′)r < β < min ( )n q −( 1 , q – – 1 + (n – 1) q / ′)r and 1 < q < ∞, then T f C fA m L L x q n x q n, ( ) ( ) β βR R≤ and T f C fA m L L x q n x q n, ( ) ( ) ∗ ≤ β βR R . As a simple corollary of Theorem 1 and Lemma 3, when r > 1, we have the follo- wing result. Corollary 1. Let R A x ym + 1( ; , ) and A be defined as above, m ∈ N , r > 1, 1 < < q < ∞, 0 < p ≤ ∞, and Ω ∈ L L Sr n(ln ) ( )− 1 . I f max /−( +n q λ , – 1 / q – (n – – 1) ′ + )r λ < α < min ( / )n q1 1−( + λ , 1 – 1 / q + (n – 1) ′ + )r λ , then TA m, and TA m, ∗ are bounded on MK p q n� , , ( )α λ R . Lemma 4 [5]. Let R A x ym + 1( ; , ) and A be defined as above, m ∈ N , r = 1, and Ω ∈ L L Sn(ln ) ( )− 1 . If – 1 < β < q – 1 and 1 < q < ∞, then T f C fA m L L x q n x q n, ( ) ( ) β βR R≤ and T f C fA m L L x q n x q n, ( ) ( ) ∗ ≤ β βR R . As a simple corollary of Theorem 1 and Lemma 4, when r = 1, we have the follo- wing result. Corollary 2. Let R A x ym + 1( ; , ) and A be defined as above, m ∈ N , 1 < q < < ∞, 0 < p ≤ ∞, and Ω ∈ L L Sn(ln ) ( )− 1 . If – 1 < β < q – 1, then TA m, and TA m, ∗ are bounded on MK p q n� , , ( )α λ R . According to [3] (Theorem 2.1), Corollaries 1 and 2 are proved easily. 1. Muckenhoupt B., Wheeden R. L. Weighted norm inequalities for singular and fractional integrals // Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. – 1971. – 161. – P. 249 – 258. 2. Duoandikoetxea J. Weighted norm inequalities for homogeneous singular integrals // Ibid. – 1993.– 336. – P. 869 – 880. 3. Lu S. Z., Xu L. F. Boundedness of rough singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey – Herz spaces // Hokkaido Math. J. – 2005. – 34, # 2. – P. 299 – 314. 4. Cohen J., Gosselin J. A BMO estimate for multilinear singular integral // Ill. J. Math. – 1986. – 30. – P. 445 – 464. 5. Xu L. F. Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Herz // J. Beijing Normal Univ. (Natur. Sci.). – 2004. – 40, # 3. – P. 297 – 303. Received 24.12.08 ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2009, t. 61, # 10
id umjimathkievua-article-3112
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:36:28Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/c1/93db0372c784ea038db7605f974cc5c1.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-31122020-03-18T19:45:28Z Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces Обмеженість багатолінійних сингулярних інтегральних операторів на однорідних просторах Моррея - Герца Wu, Jianglong Ву, Янглонг A boundedness result is established for multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces. As applications, two corollaries about interesting cases of the boundedness of the considered operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces are obtained. A boundedness result is established for multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces. As applications, two corollaries about interesting cases of the boundedness of the considered operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces are obtained. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2009-10-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3112 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 61 No. 10 (2009); 1434-1440 Український математичний журнал; Том 61 № 10 (2009); 1434-1440 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3112/2972 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3112/2973 Copyright (c) 2009 Wu Jianglong
spellingShingle Wu, Jianglong
Ву, Янглонг
Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces
title Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces
title_alt Обмеженість багатолінійних сингулярних інтегральних операторів на однорідних просторах Моррея - Герца
title_full Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces
title_fullStr Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces
title_full_unstemmed Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces
title_short Boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous Morrey–Herz spaces
title_sort boundedness of multilinear singular integral operators on the homogeneous morrey–herz spaces
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3112
work_keys_str_mv AT wujianglong boundednessofmultilinearsingularintegraloperatorsonthehomogeneousmorreyherzspaces
AT vuânglong boundednessofmultilinearsingularintegraloperatorsonthehomogeneousmorreyherzspaces
AT wujianglong obmeženístʹbagatolíníjnihsingulârnihíntegralʹnihoperatorívnaodnorídnihprostorahmorreâgerca
AT vuânglong obmeženístʹbagatolíníjnihsingulârnihíntegralʹnihoperatorívnaodnorídnihprostorahmorreâgerca