Weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators

In this paper, the sharp estimates for some multilinear commutators related to certain sublinear integral operators are obtained. The operators include the Littlewood - Paley operator and the Marcinkiewicz operator. As application, we obtain the weighted $L^p (p > 1)$ inequalities and $L \lo...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2007
Автори: Hong, Xu, Liu, Lanzhe, Zeng, Jiasheng, Гонг, Сюй, Лю, Ланже, Цзен, Цзяшен
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2007
Онлайн доступ:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3400
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860509484100616192
author Hong, Xu
Liu, Lanzhe
Zeng, Jiasheng
Гонг, Сюй
Лю, Ланже
Цзен, Цзяшен
author_facet Hong, Xu
Liu, Lanzhe
Zeng, Jiasheng
Гонг, Сюй
Лю, Ланже
Цзен, Цзяшен
author_sort Hong, Xu
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T19:53:10Z
description In this paper, the sharp estimates for some multilinear commutators related to certain sublinear integral operators are obtained. The operators include the Littlewood - Paley operator and the Marcinkiewicz operator. As application, we obtain the weighted $L^p (p > 1)$ inequalities and $L \log L$-type estimate for the multilinear commutators.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:41:50Z
format Article
fulltext UDC 517.9 Hong Xu, Jiasheng Zeng, Lanzhe Liu (Hunan Univ., China) WEIGHTED SHARP BOUNDEDNESS FOR MULTILINEAR COMMUTATORS ЗВАЖЕНА ТОЧНА ОБМЕЖЕНIСТЬ ДЛЯ МУЛЬТИЛIНIЙНИХ КОМУТАТОРIВ In this paper, the sharp estimates for some multilinear commutators related to certain sublinear integral operators are obtained. The operators include the Littlewood – Paley operator and the Marcinkiewicz operator. As application, we obtain the weighted Lp (p > 1) inequalities and L log L-type estimate for the multilinear commutators. Одержано точнi оцiнки для деяких мультилiнiйних комутаторiв, що пов’язанi з певними сублiнiй- ними iнтегральними операторами. Цi оператори включають в себе оператор Лiтлвуда – Палея та оператор Марцiнкевича. Як застосування, отримано зваженi Lp (p > 1) нерiвностi та оцiнку типу L log L для мультилiнiйних комутаторiв. 1. Introduction. Let b ∈ BMO(Rn) and T be the Calderón – Zygmund operator. The commutator [b, T ] generated by b and T is defined by [b, T ]f(x) = b(x)Tf(x) − − T (bf)(x). By virtue of classical result of Coifman, Rochberg and Weiss [1], we know that the commutator [b, T ] is bounded on Lp(Rn) (1 < p < ∞). However, it was observed that [b, T ] is not bounded, in general, from L1(Rn) to L1,∞(Rn). In [2], the sharp inequalities for some multilinear commutators of the Calderón – Zygmund singular integral operators are obtained. The main purpose of this paper is to prove the sharp estimates for some multilinear commutators related to certain sublinear integral operators. In fact, we shall establish the sharp estimates for the multilinear commutators only under certain conditions on the size of the operators. The operators include the Littlewood – Paley operator and the Marcinkiewicz operator. As the applications, we obtain the weighted norm inequalities and L logL-type estimate for these multilinear commutators. In Section 2, we will give some concepts and theorems of this paper, whose proofs will appear in Section 3. 2. Preliminaries and theorems. First, let us introduce some notations (see [2 – 5]). Throughout this paper, Q will denote a cube of Rn with sides parallel to the axes. For any locally integrable function f, the sharp function of f is defined by f#(x) = sup x∈Q 1 |Q| ∫ Q |f(y)− fQ|dy, where, and in what follows, fQ = |Q|−1 ∫ Q f(x)dx. It is well known that (see [3]) f#(x) = sup x∈Q inf c∈C 1 |Q| ∫ Q |f(y)− c|dy. We say that f belongs to BMO(Rn) if f# belongs to L∞(Rn) and ‖f‖BMO = = ‖f#‖L∞ . For 0 < r <∞, we denote f# r by f# r (x) = [(|f |r)#(x)]1/r. c© HONG XU, JIASHENG ZENG, LANZHE LIU, 2007 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 1419 1420 HONG XU, JIASHENG ZENG, LANZHE LIU Let M be the Hardy – Littlewood maximal operator, i.e., M(f)(x) = sup x∈Q |Q|−1 × × ∫ Q |f(y)|dy; we write Mp(f) = (M(fp))1/p. For k ∈ N, we denote by Mk the operator M iterated k times, i.e., M1(f)(x) = M(f)(x) and Mk(f)(x) = = M(Mk−1(f))(x) for k ≥ 2. Let Φ be a Young function and Φ̃ be the complement associated with Φ. For a function f, we denote the Φ-average by ‖f‖Φ,Q = inf λ > 0: 1 |Q| ∫ Q Φ ( |f(y)| λ ) dy ≤ 1  and the maximal function associated to Φ by MΦ(f)(x) = sup x∈Q ‖f‖Φ,Q. The main Young function to be used in this paper is Φ(t) = exp(tr) − 1 and Ψ(t) = = t logr(t + e), the corresponding Φ-average and maximal functions are denoted by ‖ · ‖exp Lr,Q, Mexp Lr and ‖ · ‖L(log L)r,Q, ML(log L)r . We have the following inequality for any r > 0 and m ∈ N : M(f) ≤ML(log L)r (f), ML(log L)m(f) ∼Mm+1(f). For r ≥ 1, we denote ‖b‖oscexp Lr = sup Q ‖b− bQ‖exp Lr,Q; the spaces Oscexp Lr is defined by Oscexp Lr = { b ∈ L1 log(R n) : ‖b‖oscexp Lr <∞ } . It is that (see [2]) ‖b− b2kQ‖exp Lr,2kQ ≤ Ck‖b‖Oscexp Lr . It is obvious that Oscexp Lr coincides with the BMO space if r = 1. For rj > 0 and bj ∈ Oscexp Lrj for j = 1, . . . ,m, we denote 1/r = 1/r1 + . . . + 1/rm and ‖b̃‖ = ∏m j=1 ‖bj‖Oscexp L rj . Given a positive integer m and 1 ≤ j ≤ m, we denote by Cm j the family of all finite subsets σ = {σ(1), . . . , σ(j)} of {1, . . . ,m} of j different elements. For σ ∈ Cm j , denote σc = {1, . . . ,m} \ σ. For b̃ = (b1, . . . , bm) and σ = {σ(1), . . . , σ(j)} ∈ Cm j , denote b̃σ = (bσ(1), . . . , bσ(j)), bσ = bσ(1) . . . bσ(j) and ‖b̃σ‖Oscexp Lrσ = ‖bσ(1)‖Osc exp L rσ(1) . . . ‖bσ(j)‖Osc exp L rσ(j) . We denote the Muckenhoupt weights by Ap for 1 ≤ p <∞ (see [3]). We are going to consider some integral operators defined below. Let bj , j = 1, . . . ,m, be the fixed locally integral functions on Rn. Definition 1. Let λ > 3 + 2/n, ε > 0 and ψ be a fixed function which satisfies the following properties: (1) ∫ ψ(x)dx = 0, (2) |ψ(x)| ≤ C(1 + |x|)−(n+1), ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 WEIGHTED SHARP BOUNDEDNESS FOR MULTILINEAR COMMUTATORS 1421 (3) |ψ(x+ y)− ψ(x)| ≤ C|y|ε(1 + |x|)−(n+1+ε) when 2|y| < |x|. The Littlewood – Paley multilinear commutator is defined by gb̃ λ(f)(x) = ∫ ∫ Rn+1 + ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ |F b̃ t (f)(x, y)|2 dydt tn+1  1/2 , where F b̃ t (f)(x, y) = ∫ Rn  m∏ j=1 (bj(x)− bj(z)) ψt(y − z)f(z)dz and ψt(x) = t−nψ(x/t) for t > 0. Set Ft(f) = ψt ∗ f. We also define that gλ(f)(x) = ∫ ∫ Rn+1 + ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ ∣∣Ft(f)(y) ∣∣2 dydt tn+1  1/2 , which is the Littlewood – Paley function (see [6]). Let H be the Hilbert space H = { h : ‖h‖ = (∫ ∫ Rn+1 + |h(y, t)|2dydt/tn+1 )1/2 < <∞ } . Then for each fixed x ∈ Rn, FA t (f)(x, y) may be regarded as a mapping from (0,+∞) to H, and it is clear that gb̃ λ(f)(x) = ∥∥∥∥∥ ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 F b̃ t (f)(x, y) ∥∥∥∥∥ and gλ(f)(x) = ∥∥∥∥∥ ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 Ft(f)(y) ∥∥∥∥∥ . Definition 2. Let λ > 1, 0 < γ ≤ 1 and Ω be homogeneous of degree zero on Rn such that ∫ Sn−1 Ω(x′)dσ(x′) = 0. Assume that Ω ∈ Lipγ(Sn−1), i.e., there exists a constant M > 0 such that for any x, y ∈ Sn−1, ∣∣Ω(x) − Ω(y) ∣∣ ≤ M |x − y|γ . We denote Γ(x) = { (y, t) ∈ Rn+1 + : |x− y| < t } and the characteristic function of Γ(x) by χΓ(x). The Marcinkiewicz multilinear commutator is defined by µb̃ λ(f)(x) = ∫ ∫ Rn+1 + ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ |F b̃ t (f)(x, y)|2 dydt tn+3  1/2 , where F b̃ t (f)(x, y) = ∫ |y−z|≤t Ω(y − z) |y − z|n−1  m∏ j=1 (bj(x)− bj(z)) f(z)dz. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 1422 HONG XU, JIASHENG ZENG, LANZHE LIU We set Ft(f)(y) = ∫ |y−z|≤t Ω(y − z) |y − z|n−1 f(z)dz. We also define µλ(f)(x) = ∫ ∫ Rn+1 + ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ |Ft(f)(y)|2 dydt tn+3  1/2 , which is the Marcinkiewicz integral (see [7]). Let H be the space H = { h : ‖h‖ = (∫ ∫ Rn+1 + |h(y, t)|2dydt/tn+3 )1/2 < ∞ } . Then, it is clear that µA λ (f)(x) = ∥∥∥∥∥ ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 F b̃ t (f)(x, y) ∥∥∥∥∥ and µλ(f)(x) = ∥∥∥∥∥ ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 Ft(f)(y) ∥∥∥∥∥ . More generally, we define the following multilinear commutator related to certain integral operators. Definition 3. Let F (x, y, t) be a function defined on Rn×Rn×[0,+∞), we denote that Ft(f)(x) = ∫ Rn F (x, y, t)f(y)dy and F b̃ t (f)(x) = ∫ Rn  m∏ j=1 (bj(x)− bj(y)) F (x, y, t)f(y)dy for every bounded and compactly supported function f. Let H be the Banach space H = { h : ‖h‖ <∞ } such that, for each fixed x ∈ Rn, Ft(f)(x) and F b̃ t (f)(x) may be regarded as a mapping from [0,+∞) to H. Then, the multilinear commutator related to F b̃ t is defined by Tb̃(f)(x) = ∥∥F b̃ t (f)(x) ∥∥; we also denote T (f)(x) = ∥∥Ft(f)(x) ∥∥. Note that when b1 = . . . = bm, Tb̃ is just the m order commutator. It is well known that commutators are of great interest in harmonic analysis and have been widely studied by many authors (see [1, 2, 4, 5, 8 – 12]). Our main purpose is to establish the sharp inequalities for the multilinear commutator operators. The following theorems are our main results: ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 WEIGHTED SHARP BOUNDEDNESS FOR MULTILINEAR COMMUTATORS 1423 Theorem 1. Let rj ≥ 1 and bj ∈ Oscexp Lrj for j = 1, . . . ,m. Denote 1/r = = 1/r1 + . . .+ 1/rm. Then the following statements are frue: (1) For any 0 < p < q < 1, there exists a constant C > 0 such that for any f ∈ C∞ 0 (Rn) and any x ∈ Rn, (gb̃ λ(f))#p (x) ≤ C ‖b‖ML(log L)1/r (f)(x) + m∑ j=1 ∑ σ∈Cm j Mq(g b̃σc λ (f)(x) . (2) If 1 < p <∞ and w ∈ Ap, then∥∥gb̃ λ(f) ∥∥ Lp(w) ≤ C‖b̃‖ ‖f‖Lp(w). (3) Denote Φ(t) = t log1/r(t + e). If w ∈ A1, then there exists a constant C > 0 such that for all λ > 0, w ({ x ∈ Rn : gb̃ λ(f)(x) > λ }) ≤ C ∫ Rn Φ ( ‖b̃‖|f(x)| λ ) w(x)dx. Theorem 2. Let rj ≥ 1 and bj ∈ Oscexp Lrj for j = 1, . . . ,m. Denote 1/r = = 1/r1 + . . .+ 1/rm. Then the following statements are frue: (1) For any 0 < p < q < 1, there exists a constant C > 0 such that for any f ∈ C∞ 0 (Rn) and any x ∈ Rn, (µb̃ λ(f))#p (x) ≤ C ‖b‖ML(log L)1/r (f)(x) + m∑ j=1 ∑ σ∈Cm j Mq(µ b̃σc λ (f)(x) . (2) If 1 < p <∞ and w ∈ Ap, then∥∥µb̃ λ(f) ∥∥ Lp(w) ≤ C‖b̃‖‖f‖Lp(w). (3) Denote Φ(t) = t log1/r(t + e). If w ∈ A1, then there exists a constant C > 0 such that for all λ > 0, w ({ x ∈ Rn : µb̃ λ(f)(x) > λ }) ≤ C ∫ Rn Φ ( ‖b̃‖|f(x)| λ ) w(x)dx. 3. Proofs of theorems. We begin with a general theorem. Main Theorem. Let rj ≥ 1 and bj ∈ Oscexp Lrj for j = 1, . . . ,m. Denote 1/r = = 1/r1 + . . .+ 1/rm. Suppose that T is the same as in Definition 1 and such that T is bounded on Lp(w) for all w ∈ Ap, 1 < p <∞, and weak (L1(w), L1(w)) bounded for all w ∈ A1. If T satisfies the size condition∥∥∥Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f)(x)− −Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f)(x0) ∥∥∥ ≤ CML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃) for any cube Q = Q(x0, d) with supp f ⊂ (2Q)c and x, x̃ ∈ Q = Q(x0, d), then for any 0 < p < q < 1, there exists a constant C > 0 such that, for any f ∈ C∞ 0 (Rn) and any x ∈ Rn, ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 1424 HONG XU, JIASHENG ZENG, LANZHE LIU (Tb̃(f))#p (x) ≤ C ‖b‖ML(log L)1/r (f)(x) + m∑ j=1 ∑ σ∈Cm j Mq(Tb̃σc (f)(x)) . To prove the theorem, we need the following lemmas: Lemma 1 (Kolmogorov, [3, p. 485]). Let 0 < p < q < ∞ and let f ≥ 0 be an arbitrary function. We define, for 1/r = 1/p− 1/q, ‖f‖WLq = sup λ>0 λ ∣∣{x ∈ Rn : f(x) > λ} ∣∣1/q , Np,q(f) = sup E ‖fχE‖Lp/‖χE‖Lr , where the sup is taken for all measurable sets E with 0 < |E| <∞. Then ‖f‖WLq ≤ Np,q(f) ≤ ( q/(q − p) )1/p‖f‖WLq . Lemma 2 [2]. Let rj ≥ 1 for j = 1, . . . ,m. Denote 1/r = 1/r1 + . . . + 1/rm. Then 1 |Q| ∫ Q ∣∣f1(x) . . . fm(x)g(x) ∣∣dx ≤ ‖f‖exp Lr1 ,Q . . . ‖f‖exp Lrm ,Q‖g‖L(log L)1/r,Q. Proof of Main Theorem. It suffices to prove that, for f ∈ C∞ 0 (Rn) and some constant C0, the following inequality holds: 1 |Q| ∫ Q |Tb̃(f)(x)− C0|pdx 1/p ≤ ≤ C ‖b‖ML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃) + m∑ j=1 ∑ σ∈Cm j Mq(Tb̃σc (f))(x̃) . Fix a cube Q = Q(x0, d) and x̃ ∈ Q. We first consider the case m = 1. For f1 = fχ2Q and f2 = fχRn\2Q, we write F b1 t (f)(x) = = (b1(x)− (b1)2Q)Ft(f)(x)− Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q)f1)(x)− Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q)f2)(x), then∣∣Tb1(f)(x)− T (((b1)2Q − b1)f2)(x0) ∣∣ ≤ ∥∥F b1 t (f)(x)− Ft(((b1)2Q − b1)f2)(x0) ∥∥ ≤ ≤ ∥∥(b1(y)− (b1)2Q)Ft(f)(x) ∥∥+ ∥∥Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q)f1)(x) ∥∥+ + ∥∥Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q)f2)(x)− Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q)f2)(x0) ∥∥ = = I(x) + II(x) + III(x). For I(x), by Hölder’s inequality for the exponent 1/l + 1/l′ = 1 with 1 < l < q/p and pl = q, we have 1 |Q| ∫ Q |I(x)|pdx 1/p =  1 |Q| ∫ Q |b1(x)− (b1)2Q|p|T (f)(x)|pdx 1/p ≤ ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 WEIGHTED SHARP BOUNDEDNESS FOR MULTILINEAR COMMUTATORS 1425 ≤  C |2Q| ∫ 2Q |b1(x)− (b1)2Q|pl′ 1/pl′  1 |Q| ∫ Q |T (f)(x)|pldx 1/pl ≤ ≤ C‖b1‖Oscexp LrMpl(T (f))(x̃) ≤ C‖b1‖Oscexp LrMq(T (f))(x̃). For II(x), by Lemma 1 and the weak type (1, 1) of T, we have 1 |Q| ∫ Q |B(x)|pdx 1/p =  1 |Q| ∫ Q ∣∣T ((b1 − (b1)2Q)f1)(x) ∣∣pdx 1/p ≤ ≤ C|2Q|−1 ‖T ((b1 − (b1)2Q)f1)‖Lp |2Q|1/p−1 ≤ ≤ C|2Q|−1‖T ((b1 − (b1)2Q)fχ2Q)‖WL1 ≤ ≤ C|2Q|−1 ∫ 2Q |b1(x)− (b1)2Q‖f(x)|dx ≤ ≤ C‖b1 − (b1)2Q‖exp Lr,2Q‖f‖L(log L)1/r,2Q ≤ ≤ C‖b1‖Oscexp LrML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃). For III(x), using the size condition of T, we have 1 |Q| ∫ Q |C(x)|pdx 1/p ≤ CML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃). We now consider the case m ≥ 2. For b = (b1, . . . , bm), we write F b̃ t (f)(x) = ∫ Rn  m∏ j=1 (bj(x)− bj(y)) F (x, y, t)f(y)dy = = ∫ Rn (b1(x)− (b1)2Q)− (b1(y)− (b1)2Q) . . . (bm(x)− −(bm)2Q)− (bm(y)− (bm)2Q)F (x, y, t)f(y)dy = = m∑ j=0 ∑ σ∈Cm j (−1)m−j(b(x)− (b)2Q)σ ∫ Rn (b(y)− (b)2Q)σF (x, y, t)f(y)dy = = (b1(x)− (b1)2Q) . . . (bm(x)− (bm)2Q)Ft(f)(x)+ +(−1)mFt((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f)(x)+ + m−1∑ j=1 ∑ σ∈Cm j (−1)m−j(b(x)− (b)2Q)σ ∫ Rn (b(y)− b(x))σcF (x, y, t)f(y)dy = = (b1(x)− (b1)2Q) . . . (bm(x)− (bm)2Q)Ft(f)(x)+ ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 1426 HONG XU, JIASHENG ZENG, LANZHE LIU +(−1)mFt((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f)(x)+ + m−1∑ j=1 ∑ σ∈Cm j cm,j(b(x)− (b)2Q)σF b̃σc t (f)(x), whence ∣∣∣Tb̃(f)(x)− (−1)mT ((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q))f2)(x0) ∣∣∣ ≤ ≤ ∥∥∥Fb̃(f)(x)− (−1)mFt((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q))f2)(x0) ∥∥∥ ≤ ≤ ∥∥∥(b1(x)− (b1)2Q) . . . (bm(x)− (bm)2Q)Ft(f)(x) ∥∥∥+ + m−1∑ j=1 ∑ σ∈Cm j ∥∥(b(x)− (b)2Q)σF b̃σc t (f)(x) ∥∥+ + ∥∥Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f1)(x) ∥∥+ + ∥∥Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f2)(x)− −Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f2)(x0) ∥∥ = = I1(x) + I2(x) + I3(x) + I4(x). For I1(x) and I2(x), similar to the proof of the case m = 1, we get 1 |Q| ∫ Q (I1(x))pdx 1/p ≤ CMq(T (f))(x̃) and  1 |Q| ∫ Q (I2(x))pdx 1/p ≤ C m−1∑ j=1 ∑ σ∈Cm j ML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃). For I3, by the weak type (1, 1) of T and Lemma 2, we obtain 1 |Q| ∫ Q (I3(x))pdx 1/p ≤ ≤ C |2Q| ∫ 2Q |b1(x)− (b1)2Q| . . . |bm(x)− (bm)2Q‖f(x)|dx ≤ ≤ C‖b1 − (b1)2Q‖exp Lr1 ,2Q . . . ‖bm − (bm)2Q‖exp Lrm ,2Q‖f‖L(log L)1/r,2Q ≤ ≤ C‖b‖ML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃). For I4, using the size condition of T, we have ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 WEIGHTED SHARP BOUNDEDNESS FOR MULTILINEAR COMMUTATORS 1427  1 |Q| ∫ Q (I4(x))pdx 1/p ≤ CML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃). This completes the proof of the Main Theorem. To prove Theorems 1 and 2, it suffices to verify that gb̃ λ and µb̃ λ satisfy the size condition in Main Theorem, that is∥∥∥∥∥ [( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 − ( t t+ |x0 − y| )nλ/2 ] × × Ft ( (b1 − (b1)2Q ) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f)(y) ∥∥∥∥∥ ≤ ≤ CML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃). Suppose that supp f ⊂ Qc and x ∈ Q = Q(x0, d). Note that |x0 − z| ≈ |x− z| for z ∈ Qc. For gb̃ λ, by the condition of ψ and the inequality a1/2 − b1/2 ≤ (a − b)1/2 for a ≥ b > 0, we get ∥∥∥∥∥ [( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 − ( t t+ |x0 − y| )nλ/2 ] × ×Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f)(y) ∥∥∥∥∥ ≤ ≤ ∫ ∫ Rn+1 + ∫ (2Q)c [ tnλ/2|x0 − x|1/2 (t+ |x0 − y|)(nλ+1)/2 ∣∣b1(z)− (b1)2Q ∣∣ . . . . . . ∣∣bm(z)− (bm)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)| ∣∣ψt(y − z) ∣∣dz]2 dydt tn+1  1/2 ≤ ≤ C ∫ (2Q)c ∣∣b1(z)− (b1)2Q ∣∣ . . . ∣∣bm(z)− (bm)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)|× × ∫ ∫ Rn+1 + t1−n+nλ|x0 − x|dydt (t+ |x0 − y|)nλ+1(t+ |y − z|)2n+2  1/2 dz; noting that 2t+ |y − z| ≥ 2t+ |x0 − z| − |x0 − y| ≥ t+ |x0 − z| for |x0 − y| ≤ t and 2k+1t + |y − z| ≥ 2k+1t + |x0 − z| − |x0 − y| ≥ |x0 − z| for |x0 − y| ≤ 2k+1t and recalling that λ > (3n+ 2)/n, we get t−n ∫ Rn ( t t+ |x0 − y| )nλ dy (t+ |y − z|)2n+2 = ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 1428 HONG XU, JIASHENG ZENG, LANZHE LIU = t−n ∫ |x0−y|≤t ( t t+ |x0 − y| )nλ dy (t+ |y − z|)2n+2 + +t−n ∞∑ k=0 ∫ 2kt<|x0−y|≤2k+1t ( t t+ |x0 − y| )nλ dy (t+ |y − z|)2n+2 ≤ ≤ t−n  ∫ |x0−y|≤t 22n+2dy (2t+ 2|y − z|)2n+2 + + ∞∑ k=0 ∫ |x0−y|≤2k+1t 2−knλ 2(k+2)(2n+2)dy (2k+2t+ 2k+2|y − z|)2n+2  ≤ ≤ Ct−n  ∫ |x0−y|≤t dy (2t+ |y − z|)2n+2 + + ∞∑ k=0 ∫ |x0−y|≤2k+1t 2−knλ 2k(2n+2)dy (t+ 2k+1t+ |y − z|)2n+2  ≤ ≤ Ct−n  ∫ |x0−y|≤t dy (t+ |x0 − z|)2n+2 + + ∞∑ k=0 ∫ |x0−y|≤2k+1t 2−knλ 2k(2n+2)dy (t+ |x0 − z|)2n+2  ≤ ≤ Ct−n [ tn (t+ |x0 − z|)2n+2 + ∞∑ k=0 2k(3n+2−nλ) tn (t+ |x0 − z|)2n+2 ] ≤ ≤ C (t+ |x0 − z|)2n+2 , since ∞∫ 0 dt (t+ |x0 − z|)2n+2 = C|x0 − z|−2n−1, we obtain ∥∥∥∥∥ [( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 − ( t t+ |x0 − y| )nλ/2 ] × ×Ft((b1 − (b1)2Q) . . . (bm − (bm)2Q)f)(y) ∥∥∥∥∥ ≤ ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 WEIGHTED SHARP BOUNDEDNESS FOR MULTILINEAR COMMUTATORS 1429 ≤ C ∫ (2Q)c ∣∣b1(z)− (b1)2Q ∣∣ . . . ∣∣bm(z)− (bm)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)| |x0 − x|1/2 |x0 − z|n+1/2 dz ≤ ≤ C ∞∑ k=1 ∫ 2k+1Q\2kQ |x0 − x|1/2|x0 − z|−(n+1/2) ∥∥∥∥∥∥ m∏ j=1 (bj(z)− (bj)2Q) ∥∥∥∥∥∥ |f(z)|dz ≤ ≤ C ∞∑ k=1 2−k/2|2k+1Q|−1 ∫ 2k+1Q ∥∥∥∥∥∥ m∏ j=1 (bj(z)− (bj)2Q) ∥∥∥∥∥∥ |f(z)|dz ≤ ≤ C ∞∑ k=1 2−k/2 m∏ j=1 ∥∥bj − (bj)2Q ∥∥ exp Lrj ,2k+1Q ‖f‖L(log L)1/r,2k+1Q ≤ ≤ C ∞∑ k=1 km2−k/2 m∏ j=1 ‖bj‖Oscexp L rj ML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃) ≤ ≤ C m∏ j=1 ‖bj‖Oscexp L rj ML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃). For µb̃ λ, by the condition of Ω, we get∥∥∥∥∥ [( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 − ( t t+ |x0 − y| )nλ/2 ] × ×Ft ( (b1 − (b1)2Q ) . . . ( bm − (bm)2Q)f ) (y) ∥∥∥∥∥ ≤ ≤ C ∫ ∫ Rn+1 + ∫ (2Q)c [ χΓ(z)(y, t)tnλ/2|x0 − x|1/2 (t+ |x− y|)(nλ+1)/2|y − z|n−1 × × m∏ j=1 |bj(z)− (bj)2Q‖f(z)|dz ]2 dydt tn+3  1/2 ≤ ≤ C ∫ (2Q)c m∏ j=1 ∣∣bj(z)− (bj)2Q ∣∣|f(z)| ∫ ∫ Rn+1 + χΓ(z)(y, t)tnλ−n−3|x0 − x|dydt (t+ |x− y|)nλ+1|y − z|2n−2  1/2 dz; noting that the inequalities |x− z| ≤ 2t and |y − z| ≥ |x− z| − t ≥ |x− z| − 3t hold for |x− y| ≤ t and |y − z| ≤ t and the inequalities |x− z| ≤ t(1 + 2k+1) ≤ 2k+2t and |y − z| ≥ |x− z| − 2k+3t hold for |x− y| ≤ 2k+1t and |y − z| ≤ t, we obtain∥∥∥∥∥ [( t t+ |x− y| )nλ/2 − ( t t+ |x0 − y| )nλ/2 ] × ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 1430 HONG XU, JIASHENG ZENG, LANZHE LIU ×Ft ( (b1 − (b1)2Q ) . . . ( bm − (bm)2Q ) f)(y) ∥∥∥∥∥ ≤ ≤ C ∫ (2Q)c m∏ j=1 ∣∣bj(z)− (bj)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)| |x0 − x|1/2× ×  ∞∫ 0 ∫ |x−y|≤t ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ+1 χΓ(z)(y, t)t−ndydt (|x− z| − 3t)2n+2  1/2 dz+ + C ∫ (2Q)c m∏ j=1 ∣∣bj(z)− (bj)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)| |x0 − x|1/2× ×  ∞∫ 0 ∞∑ k=0 ∫ 2kt<|x−y|≤2k+1t ( t t+ |x− y| )nλ+1 χΓ(z)(y, t)t−ndydt (|x− z| − 2k+3t)2n+2  1/2 dz ≤ ≤ C ∫ (2Q)c m∏ j=1 ∣∣bj(z)− (bj)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)| |x0 − x|1/2× ×  ∞∫ |x−z|/2 dt (|x− z| − 3t)2n+2  1/2 dz + + C ∫ (2Q)c m∏ j=1 ∣∣bj(z)− (bj)2Q‖f(z)‖x0 − x ∣∣1/2× ×  ∞∑ k=0 ∞∫ 2−2−k|x−z| 2−k(nλ+2)(2kt)nt−n2kdt (|x− z| − 2k+3t)2n+2  1/2 dz ≤ ≤ C ∫ (2Q)c m∏ j=1 ∣∣bj(z)− (bj)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)| |x0 − x|1/2 ∣∣x− z|−n−1/2dz+ +C ∫ (2Q)c m∏ j=1 ∣∣bj(z)− (bj)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)| |x0 − x ∣∣1/2 ∞∑ k=0 2k(n−nλ−2)/2|x− z|−n−1/2dz ≤ ≤ C ∫ (2Q)c m∏ j=1 ∣∣bj(z)− (bj)2Q ∣∣ |f(z)| |x0 − x|1/2 |x0 − z|n+1/2 dz ≤ ≤ C m∏ j=1 ‖bj‖Oscexp L rj ML(log L)1/r (f)(x̃). These yields the desired results. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10 WEIGHTED SHARP BOUNDEDNESS FOR MULTILINEAR COMMUTATORS 1431 By (1) and the boundedness of gλ, µλ and ML(log L)1/r , we may obtain the conclusi- ons (2), (3) of Theorems 1 and 2. This completes the proof of Theorems 1 and 2. 1. Coifman R., Meyer Y. Wavelets, Calderón – Zygmund and multilinear operators // Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. – 1997. – 48. 2. Pérez C., Trujillo-Gonzalez R. Sharp weighted estimates for multilinear commutators // J. London Math. Soc. – 2002. – 65. – P. 672 – 692. 3. Garcia-Cuerva J., Rubio de Francia J. L. Weighted norm inequalities and related topics // North- Holland Math. – 1985. – 16. 4. Pérez C. Endpoint estimate for commutators of singular integral operators // J. Funct. Anal. – 1995. – 128. – P. 163 – 185. 5. Pérez C., Pradolini G. Sharp weighted endpoint estimates for commutators of singular integral operators // Mich. Math. J. – 2001. – 49. – P. 23 – 37. 6. Torchinsky A. The real variable methods in harmonic analysis // Pure and Appl. Math. – 1986. – 123. 7. Torchinsky A., Wang S. A note on the Marcinkiewicz integral // Colloq. math. – 1990. – 60/61. – P. 235 – 240. 8. Alvarez J., Babgy R. J., Kurtz D. S., Pérez C. Weighted estimates for commutators of linear operators // Stud. math. – 1993. – 104. – P. 195 – 209. 9. Coifman R., Rochberg R., Weiss G. Factorization theorems for Hardy spaces in several variables // Ann. Math. – 1976. – 103. – P. 611 – 635. 10. Liu L. Z. Weighted weak type estimates for commutators of Littlewood – Paley operator // Jap. J. Math. – 2003. – 29, № 1. – P. 1 – 13. 11. Liu L. Z., Lu S. Z. Weighted weak type inequalities for maximal commutators of Bochner – Riesz operator // Hokkaido Math. J. – 2003. – 32, № 1. – P. 85 – 99. 12. Pérez C. Sharp estimates for commutators of singular integrals via iterations of the Hardy – Littlewood maximal function // J. Funct. Anal. and Appl. – 1997. – 3. – P. 743 – 756. Received 25.10.2005 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2007, т. 59, № 10
id umjimathkievua-article-3400
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:41:50Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/c0/080c8c00f3aab0a5d400e749c75f9ac0.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-34002020-03-18T19:53:10Z Weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators Зважена точна обмеженість для мультилінійних комутаторів Hong, Xu Liu, Lanzhe Zeng, Jiasheng Гонг, Сюй Лю, Ланже Цзен, Цзяшен In this paper, the sharp estimates for some multilinear commutators related to certain sublinear integral operators are obtained. The operators include the Littlewood - Paley operator and the Marcinkiewicz operator. As application, we obtain the weighted $L^p (p &gt; 1)$ inequalities and $L \log L$-type estimate for the multilinear commutators. Одержано точні оцінки для деяких мультилінійних комутаторів, що пов&#039;язані з певними субліній-ними інтегральними операторами. Ці оператори включають в себе оператор Літлвуда-Палея та оператор Марцінкевича. Як застосування, отримано зважені $L^p (p &gt; 1)$ нерівності та оцінку типу $L \log L$ для мультилінійних комутаторів. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2007-10-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3400 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 59 No. 10 (2007); 1419–1431 Український математичний журнал; Том 59 № 10 (2007); 1419–1431 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3400/3543 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3400/3544 Copyright (c) 2007 Hong Xu; Liu Lanzhe; Zeng Jiasheng
spellingShingle Hong, Xu
Liu, Lanzhe
Zeng, Jiasheng
Гонг, Сюй
Лю, Ланже
Цзен, Цзяшен
Weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators
title Weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators
title_alt Зважена точна обмеженість для мультилінійних комутаторів
title_full Weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators
title_fullStr Weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators
title_full_unstemmed Weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators
title_short Weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators
title_sort weighted sharp boundedness for multilinear commutators
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3400
work_keys_str_mv AT hongxu weightedsharpboundednessformultilinearcommutators
AT liulanzhe weightedsharpboundednessformultilinearcommutators
AT zengjiasheng weightedsharpboundednessformultilinearcommutators
AT gongsûj weightedsharpboundednessformultilinearcommutators
AT lûlanže weightedsharpboundednessformultilinearcommutators
AT czenczâšen weightedsharpboundednessformultilinearcommutators
AT hongxu zvaženatočnaobmeženístʹdlâmulʹtilíníjnihkomutatorív
AT liulanzhe zvaženatočnaobmeženístʹdlâmulʹtilíníjnihkomutatorív
AT zengjiasheng zvaženatočnaobmeženístʹdlâmulʹtilíníjnihkomutatorív
AT gongsûj zvaženatočnaobmeženístʹdlâmulʹtilíníjnihkomutatorív
AT lûlanže zvaženatočnaobmeženístʹdlâmulʹtilíníjnihkomutatorív
AT czenczâšen zvaženatočnaobmeženístʹdlâmulʹtilíníjnihkomutatorív