Strong Summability of Faber Series and Estimates for the Rate of Convergence of a Group of Deviations in a Closed Domain with Piecewise-Smooth Boundary

We establish estimates for groups of deviations of Faber series in closed domains with piecewise-smooth boundary.

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2005
Автори: Lasuriya, R. A., Ласурия, Р. А.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Російська
Англійська
Опубліковано: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2005
Онлайн доступ:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3586
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860509701951717376
author Lasuriya, R. A.
Ласурия, Р. А.
Ласурия, Р. А.
author_facet Lasuriya, R. A.
Ласурия, Р. А.
Ласурия, Р. А.
author_sort Lasuriya, R. A.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T19:59:22Z
description We establish estimates for groups of deviations of Faber series in closed domains with piecewise-smooth boundary.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:45:18Z
format Article
fulltext UDK 517.5 R. A. Lasuryq (Abxaz. un-t, Suxum) SYL|NAQ SUMMYRUEMOST| RQDOV FABERA Y OCENKY SKOROSTY SXODYMOSTY HRUPPÁ UKLONENYJ V ZAMKNUTOJ OBLASTY S KUSOÇNO-HLADKOJ HRANYCEJ We establish estimates of groups of deviations of the Faber series in closed domains with a piecewise smooth boundary. Vstanovleno ocinky hrup vidxylen\ rqdiv Fabera v zamknenyx oblastqx iz kuskovo-hladkog meΩeg. 1. Pust\ C — rasßyrennaq kompleksnaq ploskost\, G — ohranyçennaq ob- last\ s Ωordanovoj hranycej ψ, D — vneßnost\ v C edynyçnoho kruha: D = = w w∈ >{ }C : 1 , D — zam¥kanye D , Γe = w w: ={ }1 — edynyçnaq ok- ruΩnost\, z = ψ ( w ) — funkcyq Rymana, otobraΩagwaq D na C\G y nor- myrovannaq uslovyem lim ( ) w w w→∞ ψ = α > 0, w = Φ( )z — funkcyq, obratnaq k z = ψ( )w , Γ1 1+ /n = z z n: ( ) /Φ = +{ }1 1 — n-q lynyq urovnq oblasty G, ρ1 1+ / ( )n z = min /ζ ζ ∈ + −{ } Γ1 1 n z , z ∈ Γ, — rasstoqnye ot toçky z ∈ Γ do n-j lynyy urovnq Γ1 1+ /n . Pust\, dalee, C GA( ) — mnoΩestvo funkcyj f ( z ) , analytyçeskyx v G y neprer¥vn¥x v G . Ohranyçennaq Ωordanova oblast\ G naz¥vaetsq oblast\g typa ( C ) (sm., naprymer, [1]), esly dlq funkcyy z = ψ ( w ) v¥polnqgtsq uslovyq: suwestvu- gt r ∈ N, wj ∈ Γe y αj ∈ ( 0, 2 ) , j = 1, 2, … , r, takye, çto ymeet mesto ravenst- vo ψ ′ ( w ) = λ α ( )w w wj r j j = − ∏ −   1 1 1 ∀ w ∈ D, hde λ ( w ) — neprer¥vnaq y otlyçnaq ot nulq na D funkcyq, modul\ nepre- r¥vnosty kotoroj udovletvorqet uslovyg ω ( λ; t ) ≤ Kt, hde K — nekotoraq poloΩytel\naq postoqnnaq. Kak yzvestno [1 – 4], oblasty typa ( C ) vklgçagt v sebq krome mnohouhol\nykov y oblasty s Ωordanov¥my hranycamy, sostoqwy- my yz koneçnoho çysla okruΩnostej yly analytyçeskyx duh. Budem hovoryt\, çto G — oblast\ typa ( C ′ ) (sm., naprymer, [5]), esly ona qvlqetsq oblast\g typa ( C ), a çysla αν, ν = 1, 2, … , r, yz opredelenyq oblasty typa ( C ) udovletvorqgt uslovyqm αν ≥ 1 2 1 1 max ; max ,j r j =       α , ν = 1, 2, … , r. Pust\ © R. A. LASURYQ, 2005 ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 187 188 R. A. LASURYQ S [ f ] = k k kc z = ∞ ∑ 0 Φ ( ) (1) — rqd Fabera funkcyy f ( z ), zadannoj na G , ck = ck ( f ) = 1 2π ψ π π − −∫ f e e dtit ikt( )( ) , k = 0, 1, 2, … , — koπffycyent¥ Fabera funkcyy f ( z ), Sn ( f ; z ) — çastyçnaq summa rqda (1). 2. Vvedem v rassmotrenye syl\n¥e srednye stepeny q > 0 rqda (1) H f zn q, ( ; ) = 1 0 1 n f z S f z k n k q q = ∑ −       ( ) ( ; ) / . (2) Sformulyruem vnaçale utverΩdenye, soderΩawee ocenku velyçyn¥ (2) v toçkax hranyc¥ oblasty typa ( C ′ ). Teorema)1. Pust\ G — oblast\ typa ( C ′ ), f ( z ) ∈ C GA( ), 1 < p ≤ 2 y pry nekotorom γ > 2 / p – 1 lim ( ( )) /δ δ γ ω ρ δ→ + + −0 1 1 z p = ∞ , z ∈ Γ, (3) monotonno vozrastaq, hde ω ( f; t ) = ω ( t ) — modul\ neprer¥vnosty f ( z ) na G . Tohda dlq lgb¥x n ∈ N y q q1 0∈( , ], q p p = −1 , v toçke z ∈ Γ H f zn q, ( ; ) 1 ≤ K znω ρ( ( ))/1 1+ , K = K ( q, γ ) . (4) Dokazatel\stvo. Na osnovanyy yzvestn¥x rassuΩdenyj [1] ymeem pred- stavlenye ρk ( f; z ) = f ( z ) – Sk ( f; z ) = = 1 4 2π ζ ζ ζ ζ π π i D t f f t z d dtk − ∫ ∫ − 〈 〉 −       ( ) ( ) ( ) Γ = = 1 4 2 0π ζ ζ ζ ζ π i D t F F t z d dtk∫ ∫ − 〈 〉 −       ( ) ( ) ( ) Γ , (5) hde ζ〈 〉t = ψ ζ( )( )Φ e it− , F( )ζ = f f t( ) ( )ζ ζ− 〈− 〉 , Dk ( t ) — qdro Dyryxle. PoloΩym I ( z; t ) = F F t z d ( ) ( )ζ ζ ζ ζ− 〈 〉 −∫ Γ . ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 SYL|NAQ SUMMYRUEMOST| RQDOV FABERA … 189 Tohda, prynymaq vo vnymanye (5), naxodym H f zn q, ( ; ) ≤ 1 1 40 1 2 0 1 1 n i D t I z t dt k n n k q q = − ∑ ∫        π / / ( ) ( ; ) + + 1 1 40 1 2 1 1 n i D t I z t dt k n n k q q = − ∑ ∫        π π / / ( ) ( ; ) = = I z I zn q n q , ( ) , ( )( ) ( )1 2+ . (6) Yzvestno [2, c. 38], çto I z t( ; ) ≤ K ztω ρ( ( ))1+ . (7) V sylu (7) ymeem I zn q , ( ) ( )1 ≤ 1 4 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 π n n I z t dt k n n q q = − ∑ ∫             / / ( ; ) ≤ ≤ Kn z dt n t 0 1 1 / ( ( ))∫ +ω ρ ≤ K znω ρ( ( )/1 1+ . (8) Ocenyvaq slahaemoe I zn q , ( ) ( )2 , predstavym qdro Dk ( ⋅ ) v vyde Dk ( t ) = sin ( / ) cos kt t kt 2 2 1 2tg + . V πtom sluçae I zn q , ( ) ( )2 = 1 4 1 2 22 0 1 1π π n I z t t kt dt k n n= − ∑ ∫     / ( ; ) ( / ) sin tg + + 1 1 1 2/ / ( ; ) cos n q q I z t kt dt π ∫     . Vvedem vspomohatel\n¥e funkcyy Φ( )( , , )1 z t n = I z t t t n t n ( ; ) ( / ) , [ , ], , [ , ] [ , ], / \ / 2 2 1 0 1 tg ∈ ∈ −     π π π π Φ( )( , , )2 z t n = 1 2 1 0 1 I z t t n t n ( ; ), [ , ], , [ , ] [ , ], / \ / ∈ ∈ −     π π π π ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 190 R. A. LASURYQ Φ( )( , , )i z t n+ 2π = Φ( )( , , )i z t n , i = 1, 2. V prynqt¥x oboznaçenyqx poluçaem ravenstva I zn q , ( ) ( )2 = 1 4 1 1 0 1 1 π π π π n z t n kt dt k n = − − ∑ ∫     Φ( )( , , ) sin + + 1 2 1 π π π − ∫     Φ( ) / ( , , ) cosz t n kt dt q q = = 1 4 1 0 1 1 2 1 π n b a k n k k q q = − ∑ +       ( ) ( )( ) ( ) / Φ Φ , hde ak ( ϕ ), bk ( ϕ ) — koπffycyent¥ Fur\e funkcyy ϕ ( ⋅ ). Yspol\zuq neravenstvo Mynkovskoho, ymeem I zn q , ( ) ( )2 ≤ 1 4 1 0 1 1 1 π n b k n k q q = − ∑      ( )( ) / Φ + + 1 4 1 0 1 2 1 π n a k n k q q = − ∑      ( )( ) / Φ = i z i zn q n q , ( ) , ( )( ) ( )1 2+ . (9) Uçyt¥vaq neravenstvo 2 2 tg t ≥ t, 0 ≤ t < π, sootnoßenye (7) y uslovye (3), v sylu teorem¥ Xausdorfa – Gnha [6, c. 153] naxodym i zn, ( )1 = 1 4 1 0 1 1 1 πn bq k n k q q / ( ) / ( ) = − ∑      Φ ≤ ≤ 1 4 2 21 1 1 π π n I z t t dtq n p p / / / ( ; ) ( / )∫        tg ≤ ≤ K n z t dtq n p t p p 1 1 1 1 / / / ( ( )) π ω ρ∫ +      = = K n z t t t dtq n p t p p p p 1 1 1 1 1 1 / / / ( ( )) π γ γ ω ρ∫ + − −         ≤ ≤ K n z n t dtq p n p n p p p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / / / / ( ( ))ω ρ γ π γ+ − − −∫         ≤ ≤ K q n z n nq n p p p p( , ) ( ( ))/ / / /γ ω ρ γ γ 1 1 1 1 2 1 + − − + +{ } = ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 SYL|NAQ SUMMYRUEMOST| RQDOV FABERA … 191 = K q n z nq n p( , ) ( ( ))/ / /γ ω ρ1 1 1 1 1 + − = = K q zn( , ) ( ( ))/γ ω ρ1 1+ , q = p p −1 . (10) Analohyçno i zn q , ( ) ( )2 ≤ K znω ρ( ( ))/1 1+ . (11) Prynymaq vo vnymanye (10), (11), yz (9) poluçaem I zn q , ( ) ( )2 ≤ K znω ρ( ( ))/1 1+ , z ∈ Γ, (12) K = K ( q, γ ) . Uçyt¥vaq (12), (8), (6), a takΩe neravenstvo dlq srednyx [7] H f zn q, ( ; ) 1 ≤ H f zn q, ( ; ) , 0 < q1 ≤ q , pryxodym k trebuemomu sootnoßenyg (4). 3. PoloΩym teper\ H f zn q, ( )( ; )λ = k n k k qu f z = ∞ ∑ λ ρ( ) ( ; ) , q > 0, (13) hde λ = ( )( )λk u , k ∈ N, — nekotoraq posledovatel\nost\ neotrycatel\n¥x funkcyj, zadann¥x na nekotorom mnoΩestve U, ymegwaq xotq b¥ odnu pre- del\nug toçku. Teorema)2. Pust\ v¥polnqgtsq vse uslovyq teorem¥I1 y λ = ( )( )λk u — nekotoraq posledovatel\nost\ neotrycatel\n¥x funkcyj takaq, çto pry kaΩdom fyksyrovannom u ∈ U posledovatel\nost\ çysel λk u( ) ne vozras- taet otnosytel\no k ∈ N. Tohda dlq lgboho n ∈ N v toçke z ∈ Γ, oprede- lqemoj ravenstvom (3), H f zn q, ( )( ; )λ ≤ K n u z u zn q n k n k q kλ ω ρ λ ω ρ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ( ))/ /1 1 1 1+ = ∞ ++       ∑ , (14) q = p p −1 , K = K ( q, γ ) . Dokazatel\stvo. Predstavlqq velyçynu (13) v vyde H f zn q, ( )( ; )λ = i k n n k k q i i u f z = ∞ = − ∑ ∑ + 0 2 2 11 λ ρ( ) ( ; ) , a takΩe uçyt¥vaq, çto v sylu (4) ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 192 R. A. LASURYQ 1 2 1 n f z k n n k q = − ∑ ρ ( ; ) ≤ 2 1 1K zq q nω ρ( )/ ( )+ , poluçaem H f zn q, ( )( ; )λ ≤ i n k n n k q i i i u f z = ∞ = − ∑ ∑ + 0 2 2 2 11 λ ρ( ) ( ; ) ≤ ≤ K u n z i n i q ni i = ∞ +∑ 0 2 1 1 2 2λ ω ρ( ) ( ( )) / = = K n u z u n zn q n i n i q ni iλ ω ρ λ ω ρ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ( ))/ /1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2+ = ∞ ++       ∑ ≤ ≤ K n u zn q nλ ω ρ( ) ( ( ))/1 1+     + + i k n n n q n i i i iu z = ∞ = − +∑ ∑ −    1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 λ ω ρ( ) ( ( )) / ≤ ≤ K n u zn q nλ ω ρ( ) ( ( ))/1 1+     + + i k n n k q k i i u z = ∞ = − +∑ ∑ −    1 2 2 1 1 1 1 λ ω ρ( ) ( ( ))/ = = K n u z u zn q n k n k q kλ ω ρ λ ω ρ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ( ))/ /1 1 1 1+ = ∞ ++       ∑ , K = K ( q, γ ) . Polahaq v (14) n = 1, naxodym H f zq1, ( )( ; )λ ≤ K u z k k q k = ∞ +∑     1 1 1λ ω ρ( ) ( ( ))/ , (15) q = p p −1 . Ysxodq yz neravenstva (15), moΩno poluçyt\ ocenky dlq dostatoçno ßyro- koho spektra syl\n¥x srednyx λ-metodov summyrovanyq rqdov, v çastnosty dlq syl\n¥x srednyx Abelq, Fejera, loharyfmyçeskyx, Valle Pussena y dr. 4. Ustanovym ocenky skorosty sxodymosty hrupp uklonenyj, opredelqem¥x ravenstvamy ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 SYL|NAQ SUMMYRUEMOST| RQDOV FABERA … 193 D f zn ( )( ; )λ = 1 1 2 n u f z k n n k k+ = ∑ λ ρ( ) ( ; ) , (16) G f zn ( )( ; )λ = k n k ku f z = ∞ ∑ λ ρ( ) ( ; ) , (17) n ∈ N . Teorema)3. Pust\ G — oblast\ typa ( C ′ ) y posledovatel\nost\ λ = = ( )( )λk u , k ∈ N, u ∈ U, takaq, çto pry kaΩdom fyksyrovannom u ∈ U çysla λk u( ) ne vozrastagt. Tohda dlq lgboj f ( z ) ∈ C GA( ) pry vsex n ∈ N y z ∈ Γ v¥polnqetsq neravenstvo D f zn ( )( ; )λ ≤ K u n z t dtn n tλ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) /1 1 2∫ + , (18) hde K — poloΩytel\naq postoqnnaq, ne zavysqwaq ot n y f ∈ C GA( ). Zameçanye. Polahaq V f zm m2 ( ; ) = 1 1 2 m S f z k m m k+ = ∑ ( ; ), vydym, çto V f zm m2 ( ; ) , m ∈ N, est\ summa Valle Pussena V f zn p n − ( ; ), v kotoroj n = 2m, p = m. Tohda v uslovyqx teorem¥I3, v sylu (18), pry λk u( ) ≡ 1 dlq lgboj f ( z ) ∈ C GA( ) y z ∈ Γ f z V f zm m( ) ( ; )− 2 ≤ K m z t dt m t 1 1 2 / ( ( )) π ω ρ∫ + . (19) Ocenka (19) ranee ustanovlena v [5]. Dokazatel\stvo teorem¥)3. Kak y preΩde, dlq velyçyn¥ (16) ymeem predstavlenye D f zn ( )( ; )λ = 1 1 4 2 2 0n u i D t F F t z d dt k n n k k+ − 〈 〉 −      = ∑ ∫ ∫λ π ζ ζ ζ ζ π ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Γ ≤ ≤ 1 1 4 2 2 0 1 n u i D t I z t dt k n n k n k+ = ∑ ∫λ π ( ) ( ) ( ; ) / + + 1 1 4 2 2 1n u i D t I z t dt k n n k n k+ = ∑ ∫λ π π ( ) ( ) ( ; ) / = = D f z D f zn n, ( ) , ( )( ; ) ( ; )1 2 λ λ+ . (20) Yspol\zuq ocenku (7), naxodym ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 194 R. A. LASURYQ D f zn, ( )( ; )1 λ ≤ K n u n z dt k n n k n t+ = +∑ ∫1 2 0 1 1λ ω ρ( ) ( ( )) / ≤ ≤ K u zn nλ ω ρ( ) ( ( ))/1 1+ . (21) Prymenqq preobrazovanye Abelq k n n k u k t = ∑ + 2 1 2λ ( ) sin ( )/ ≤ K u t nλ ( ) , (22) s uçetom (7) poluçaem D f zn, ( )( ; )2 λ = 1 4 1 2 2 1 22 1 2 π λ π ( ) ( ; ) ( / ) ( ) sin( ) / / n I z t t u k t dt n k n n k+ +∫ ∑ =sin ≤ ≤ K u n z u k t dtn n t k n n k λ ω ρ λ π ( ) ( ( )) ( ) sin ( ) / /+ +∫ ∑+ =1 1 2 1 1 2 ≤ ≤ K u n z t dtn n tλ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) /1 1 2∫ + . (23) Sohlasno (21) y (23) yz (20) naxodym D f zn ( )( ; )λ ≤ K u z n z t dtn n n tλ ω ρ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) ( ( )) / / 1 1 1 1 2 1 + ++        ∫ . (24) Zameçaq, çto 1 1 1 2n z t dt n t / ( ( )) π ω ρ∫ + ≥ 1 1 1 1 2 n z t dtn n ω ρ π ( ( ))/ / + −∫ ≥ ≥ π π ω ρ− + 1 1 1( ( ))/n z , yz (24) okonçatel\no v¥vodym D f zn ( )( ; )λ ≤ K u n z t dtn n tλ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) /1 1 2∫ + . Vvedem v rassmotrenye sledugwug velyçynu: Ωk ( z ) = sup ( ( )) /m k m t m z t dt ≥ +∫1 1 1 2 π ω ρ . (25) Ysxodq yz teorem¥I3, dokaΩem spravedlyvost\ takoho utverΩdenyq. Teorema)4. Pust\ G — oblast\ typa ( C ′ ) y posledovatel\nost\ λ = = ( λk ( u ) ) pry kaΩdom fyksyrovannom u ∈ U ne vozrastaet. Tohda dlq lgboj f ( z ) ∈ C GA( ) pry vsex n ∈ N y z ∈ Γ v¥polnqetsq neravenstvo ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 SYL|NAQ SUMMYRUEMOST| RQDOV FABERA … 195 G f zn ( )( ; )λ ≤ K n u z u zn n k n k kλ λ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )Ω Ω+     = ∞ ∑ , (26) hde K — poloΩytel\naq postoqnnaq, ne zavysqwaq ot z ∈ Γ, n ∈ N, u ∈ U y f ∈ C GA( ), a G f zn ( )( ; )λ — velyçyna, opredelqemaq ravenstvom (17). Dokazatel\stvo. Zametym, çto pry kaΩdom fyksyrovannom z ∈ Γ vely- çyna Ωk z( ) ne vozrastaet po k ∈ N. Dalee, yspol\zuq sootnoßenye (18), ymeem G f zn ( )( ; )λ = i k n n k k i i u f z = ∞ = − ∑ ∑ + 0 2 2 11 λ ρ( ) ( ; ) ≤ ≤ i k n n k k i i u f z = ∞ = − ∑ ∑ + 0 2 2 11 λ ρ( ) ( ; ) ≤ ≤ K n u n z t dt i i n i n ti i= ∞ +∑ ∫        0 2 1 2 1 22 2 ( ) ( ) ( ( )) / λ ω ρπ = = K u z t dt i n n t i i= ∞ +∑ ∫        0 2 1 2 1 2λ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) / = = K u z t dtn n tλ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) /1 1 2∫ +   + + 2 2 1 21 2 1 1 2 1 2 i n i i n t i i u n n z t dt = ∞ − +∑ ∫     λ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) / ≤ ≤ K u z t dtn n t 1 1 1 2λ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) / ∫ +   + + i k n n n i n t i i i i u n z t dt = ∞ = − +∑ ∑ ∫ −    1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 λ ω ρπ ( ) ( ( )) / . Uçyt¥vaq opredelenye (25) velyçyn¥ Ωk ( z ) , poluçaem G f zn ( )( ; )λ ≤ K λ ω ρπ n n tu z t dt( ) ( ( )) /1 1 2∫ +     + + i k n n n m n m t i i i i u m z t dt = ∞ = − ≥ +∑ ∑ ∫ −    1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1λ ω ρπ ( ) sup ( ( )) / = = K u z t dt u zn n t i k n n n n i i i iλ ω ρ λ π ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) /1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 ∫ ∑ ∑+ = ∞ = − +        − Ω ≤ ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 196 R. A. LASURYQ ≤ K n u m z t dtn m n m tλ ω ρπ ( ) sup ( ( )) /≥ +∫     1 1 1 2 + + k n k ku z = ∞ ∑     λ ( ) ( )Ω . TeoremaI4 dokazana. Polahaq v (26) n = 1, ymeem k k ku f z = ∞ ∑ 1 λ ρ( ) ( ; ) ≤ K u z k k k = ∞ ∑     1 λ ( ) ( )Ω . (27) Pust\ U f z( )( ; )λ = U f z u( )( ; ; )λ = k k ku S f z = ∞ ∑ 1 λ ( ) ( ; ) y dopolnytel\no v¥polneno uslovye k k u = ∞ ∑ 1 λ ( ) = 1 ∀ u ∈ U . Tohda v uslovyqx teorem¥I4 s uçetom ocenky (27) poluçaem neravenstvo f z U f z( ) ( ; )( )− λ ≤ K u z k k k = ∞ ∑     1 λ ( ) ( )Ω , z ∈ Γ . (28) Na osnovanyy sootnoßenyq (28) moΩno poluçyt\ ocenky uklonenyj nekotor¥x lynejn¥x srednyx summ Fabera, v tom çysle poroΩdaem¥x beskoneçn¥my prq- mouhol\n¥my matrycamy λ = λk n( )( ) , k, n ∈ N , neotrycatel\n¥x çysel. Pola- haq, naprymer, λk r( ) = ( )1 1− −r rk , 0 < r < 1, poluçaem ocenku uklonenyq sred- nyx Abelq A f zr( ; ) = ( ) ( ; )1 1 1− = ∞ −∑r r S f z k k k , pry λk n( ) = ( )ln ( )k n + −1 1, 1 ≤ k ≤ n , λk n( ) = 0, k > n , — ocenku uklonenyq loharyfmyçeskyx srednyx L f zn( ; ) = 1 1 1 1ln( ) ( ; ) n k S f zk k n + = ∑ y t. d. 1. Dzqd¥k V. K. Vvedenye v teoryg ravnomernoho pryblyΩenyq funkcyj polynomamy. – M.: Nauka, 1966. – 672 s. ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2 SYL|NAQ SUMMYRUEMOST| RQDOV FABERA … 197 2. Dzqd¥k V. K., Alybekov H. A. Summyrovanye rqdov Fabera lynejn¥my metodamy Ryssa y Fejera v oblastqx s kusoçno-hladkoj hranycej. – Kyev, 1989. – 54 s. – (Preprynt / AN USSR. Yn-t matematyky; 89.41). 3. Markußevyç A. Y. Teoryq analytyçeskyx funkcyj: V 2 t. – M.: Nauka, 1968. – T. 2. – 624 s. 4. Lebedev N. A., Íyrokov N. A. O ravnomernom pryblyΩenyy funkcyj na zamknut¥x mnoΩestvax, ymegwyx koneçnoe çyslo uhlov¥x toçek s nenulev¥my vneßnymy uhlamy // Yzv. AN ArmSSR. – 1971. – 6, # 47. – S. 311 – 341. 5. Alybekov H. A., Trofymenko V. Y. Summyrovanye rqdov Fabera metodamy ValleIPussena, Rohozynskoho y DΩeksona v oblastqx s kusoçno-hladkoj hranycej // Yssledovanyq po teoryy pryblyΩenyq funkcyj. – Kyev: Yn-t matematyky AN USSR, 1991. – S. 4 – 12. 6. Zyhmund A. Tryhonometryçeskye rqd¥: V 2 t. – M.: Myr, 1965. – T. 2. – 537 s. 7. Xardy H., Lyttlvud D., Polya H. Neravenstva. – M.: Yzd-vo ynostr. lyt., 1948. – 456 s. Poluçeno 17.09.2003 ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 2
id umjimathkievua-article-3586
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language rus
English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:45:18Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/43/401b219996eafdd81982ae09067f2743.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-35862020-03-18T19:59:22Z Strong Summability of Faber Series and Estimates for the Rate of Convergence of a Group of Deviations in a Closed Domain with Piecewise-Smooth Boundary Сильная суммируемость рядов Фабера и оценки скорости сходимости группы уклонений в замкнутой области с кусочно-гладкой границей Lasuriya, R. A. Ласурия, Р. А. Ласурия, Р. А. We establish estimates for groups of deviations of Faber series in closed domains with piecewise-smooth boundary. Встановлено оцінки груп відхилень pядів Фабера в замкнених областях iз кусково-гладкою межею. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2005-02-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3586 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 57 No. 2 (2005); 187–197 Український математичний журнал; Том 57 № 2 (2005); 187–197 1027-3190 rus en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3586/3904 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3586/3905 Copyright (c) 2005 Lasuriya R. A.
spellingShingle Lasuriya, R. A.
Ласурия, Р. А.
Ласурия, Р. А.
Strong Summability of Faber Series and Estimates for the Rate of Convergence of a Group of Deviations in a Closed Domain with Piecewise-Smooth Boundary
title Strong Summability of Faber Series and Estimates for the Rate of Convergence of a Group of Deviations in a Closed Domain with Piecewise-Smooth Boundary
title_alt Сильная суммируемость рядов Фабера и оценки скорости сходимости группы уклонений в замкнутой области с кусочно-гладкой границей
title_full Strong Summability of Faber Series and Estimates for the Rate of Convergence of a Group of Deviations in a Closed Domain with Piecewise-Smooth Boundary
title_fullStr Strong Summability of Faber Series and Estimates for the Rate of Convergence of a Group of Deviations in a Closed Domain with Piecewise-Smooth Boundary
title_full_unstemmed Strong Summability of Faber Series and Estimates for the Rate of Convergence of a Group of Deviations in a Closed Domain with Piecewise-Smooth Boundary
title_short Strong Summability of Faber Series and Estimates for the Rate of Convergence of a Group of Deviations in a Closed Domain with Piecewise-Smooth Boundary
title_sort strong summability of faber series and estimates for the rate of convergence of a group of deviations in a closed domain with piecewise-smooth boundary
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3586
work_keys_str_mv AT lasuriyara strongsummabilityoffaberseriesandestimatesfortherateofconvergenceofagroupofdeviationsinacloseddomainwithpiecewisesmoothboundary
AT lasuriâra strongsummabilityoffaberseriesandestimatesfortherateofconvergenceofagroupofdeviationsinacloseddomainwithpiecewisesmoothboundary
AT lasuriâra strongsummabilityoffaberseriesandestimatesfortherateofconvergenceofagroupofdeviationsinacloseddomainwithpiecewisesmoothboundary
AT lasuriyara silʹnaâsummiruemostʹrâdovfaberaiocenkiskorostishodimostigruppyuklonenijvzamknutojoblastiskusočnogladkojgranicej
AT lasuriâra silʹnaâsummiruemostʹrâdovfaberaiocenkiskorostishodimostigruppyuklonenijvzamknutojoblastiskusočnogladkojgranicej
AT lasuriâra silʹnaâsummiruemostʹrâdovfaberaiocenkiskorostishodimostigruppyuklonenijvzamknutojoblastiskusočnogladkojgranicej