On the Decomposition of a Diagonal Operator into a Linear Combination of Idempotents or Projectors

For a bounded operator that is not a sum of scalar and compact operators and is similar to a diagonal operator, we prove that it is a linear combination of three idempotents. It is also proved that any self-adjoint diagonal operator is a linear combination of four orthoprojectors with real coefficie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2005
Main Authors: Rabanovych, V. I., Рабанович, В. І.
Format: Article
Language:Ukrainian
English
Published: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2005
Online Access:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3606
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Download file: Pdf

Institution

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860509724797042688
author Rabanovych, V. I.
Рабанович, В. І.
author_facet Rabanovych, V. I.
Рабанович, В. І.
author_sort Rabanovych, V. I.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T19:59:42Z
description For a bounded operator that is not a sum of scalar and compact operators and is similar to a diagonal operator, we prove that it is a linear combination of three idempotents. It is also proved that any self-adjoint diagonal operator is a linear combination of four orthoprojectors with real coefficients.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:45:39Z
format Article
fulltext UDK 517.98 V. I. Rabanovyç (In-t matematyky NAN Ukra]ny, Ky]v) PRO ROZKLAD DIAHONAL|NOHO OPERATORA V LINIJNU KOMBINACIG IDEMPOTENTIV ABO PROEKTORIV * We prove that a bounded operator is a linear combination of three idempotents if it is not a sum of scalar and compact operators and is similar to a diagonal one. We also prove that any self-adjoint diagonal operator is a linear combination of four orthoprojections with real coefficients. Dovedeno, wo obmeΩenyj operator, qkyj ne [ sumog skalqrnoho i kompaktnoho operatoriv i po- dibnyj do diahonal\noho, [ linijnog kombinaci[g tr\ox idempotentiv, a bud\-qkyj samosprqΩe- nyj diahonal\nyj operator [ linijnog kombinaci[g çotyr\ox ortoproektoriv iz dijsnymy koefi- ci[ntamy. Vstup. U roboti otrymano rozklad diahonal\noho obmeΩenoho operatora D v separabel\nomu hil\bertovomu prostori H v linijnu kombinacig idempotentnyx operatoriv Qi, Qi 2 = Qi, ta qkwo D* = D, to v linijnu kombinacig ortoproek- toriv (proektoriv) Pi, Pi 2 = Pi ∗ = Pi . Dosyt\ povnyj ohlqd po cij tematyci moΩna znajty v [1]. Qk pokazano v [2], bud\-qkyj obmeΩenyj operator [ sumog p’qty idempotentiv. Bil\ß toho, qkwo operator A ≠ λ I + K ( I — odynyçnyj, K — kompaktnyj), to A [ sumog çotyr\ox idempotentiv. Na pidstavi rezul\tativ robit [2, 3] lehko pokazaty, wo 2 I + K takoΩ [ sumog çotyr\ox idempotentiv. Ta-kym çynom, koΩen operator [ linijnog kombinaci[g çotyr\ox idempotentiv (ale ne sumog çotyr\ox idempotentiv [4]). Newodavno avtorom v [5] bulo pokazano, wo koΩna skinçenna matrycq [ linijnog kombinaci[g tr\ox idempotentnyx matryc\. U p.81 my pokaΩemo, wo operatory, podibni do diahonal\nyx, [ linijnog kombinaci[g tr\ox idempotentiv, qkwo ]x vyhlqd vidminnyj vid λ I + K. Nam nevidomo, çy isnugt\ operatory, qki ne [ linijnog kombinaci[g tr\ox idempotentiv. U 1984 r. K. Matsumoto doviv, wo bud\-qkyj samosprqΩenyj operator [ linij- nog kombinaci[g p’qty ortoproektoriv [6]. Krim toho, qkwo prostir skinçenno- vymirnyj, to dostatn\o linijno] kombinaci] çotyr\ox proektoriv [7]. My dovede- mo (teorema82), wo diahonal\nyj samosprqΩenyj operator [ linijnog kombinaci- [g çotyr\ox ortoproektoriv. Qk i dlq idempotentnoho vypadku, my ne zna[mo, çy isnugt\ operatory, qki ne [ linijnog kombinaci[g çotyr\ox ortoproektoriv. Dali budemo vykorystovuvaty poznaçennq I dlq odynyçnoho operatora i A ≈ ≈ B dlq podibnosti miΩ operatoramy A i B : A = C – 1 B C, de C i C – 1 — obme- Ωeni operatory. Matrycg obmeΩenoho operatora v fiksovanomu ortonormova- nomu bazysi, u qko] lyße diahonal\ sklada[t\sq z nenul\ovyx elementiv a1, a2, a3, … , budemo poznaçaty qk diag ( a1, a2, a3, … ) . 1.$$Rozklad diahonal\nyx operatoriv u linijnu kombinacig tr\ox idempo- tentiv. U c\omu punkti my rozhlqda[mo diahonal\ni operatory, tobto operato- ry vyhlqdu C – 1 diag ( a1, a2, a3, … ) C, de C, C – 1 — obmeΩeni operatory. Poç- nemo z dovedennq isnuvannq rozkladu v linijnu kombinacig tr\ox idempotentiv dlq operatoriv zi special\noho klasu. Lema$1. Nexaj a1, … , an , … i b1, … , bn , … — dvi zbiΩni poslidovnosti kompleksnyx çysel i isnu[ çyslo ε > 0 take, wo vykonugt\sq nerivnosti | ai – – bi | > ε dlq vsix i ∈ N, * Çastkovo pidtrymano hrantom Prezydenta Ukra]ny (# F8/320-2004) i Fondom fundamental\- nyx doslidΩen\ Ukra]ny (proekt # 01.07/071). © V. I. RABANOVYÇ, 2005 388 ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 3 PRO ROZKLAD DIAHONAL|NOHO OPERATORA V LINIJNU KOMBINACIG … 389 i i n na a = ∞ →∞∑ − 1 lim < ∞ i i i n nb b = ∞ →∞∑ − 1 lim < ∞ . Todi operator D = diag ( a1, b1, a2, b2, a3, b3, … ) [ linijnog kombinaci[g tr\ox idempotentnyx operatoriv. Dovedennq. Zapyßemo konstanty, na qkyx bude bazuvatysq pobudova idem- potentnyx operatoriv: c = 10 1 1 1i i n n i i n n j j ja a b b a b = ∞ →∞ = ∞ →∞ ∈ ∑ ∑− + − + +( ) +     lim lim sup N , λ1 = 2 c, λ2 = lim lim n n n na b →∞ →∞ + − −1 1λ , λ3 = 1. Naßa meta — dovesty, wo D podibnyj do operatora, qkyj [ linijnog kombina- ci[g λ1 Q1 + λ2 Q2 + λ3 Q3, de Qi — idempotenty. Dlq c\oho vvedemo poslidov- nist\ xj : x1 = λ1 , x j2 = a b xj j j+ − − −1 2 1 = i j i ia b j = ∑ + − + + + 1 1 2 3 2( ) ( )λ λ λ λ , x j2 1+ = λ λ1 2 2+ − x j . (1) U cij poslidovnosti elementy x j2 [ „blyz\kymy” do çysla λ2, a elementy x j2 1− — do çysla – λ2. Spravdi, x j2 2− λ = i j i n n i n na a b b = →∞ →∞∑ − + −    1 lim lim ≤ c 10 (2) i x j2 1 2+ + λ = λ λ λ1 2 2 2+ + −( )x j = lim lim n n n n ja b x →∞ →∞ + − + −1 2 2λ ≤ c 5 . (3) Qk naslidok, vyvodymo, wo v poslidovnosti x1, x2, … susidni çysla [ riznymy i, bil\ß toho, x xj j+ −1 > c. (4) Qkwo poklasty z i = ( )( ) / ( )x x a b a bi i i i i i2 1 2 1− − − − , to nastupna riznycq diaho- nal\no] ta idempotentno] matryc\ bude maty vlasni çysla x i2 1− i x i2 : Vi = a b z z z z i i i i i i 0 0 1 1     − − −     ≈ x x i i 2 1 2 0 0 −    . (5) Operator � 1 ∞ Vi podibnyj do operatora X = diag ( x1, x2, x3, … ) , tobto � 1 ∞ Vi = C XC−1 . (6) Pry c\omu na pidstavi nerivnostej (2) – (4) i a bi i− > ε moΩna vvaΩaty, wo normy operatoriv C i C – 1 obmeΩeni çyslom Ω1, qke zaleΩyt\ til\ky vid çy- sel sup | aj | , sup | bj | , sup | xj | , c i ε . Iz (5) i (6) bezposeredn\o vyplyva[, wo D ≈ X + Q3 , (7) ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 3 390 V. I. RABANOVYÇ de Q3 — idempotent. Krim toho, isnugt\ idempotentni operatory Q1 i Q2 taki, wo X = λ1 Q1 + λ2 Q2 . (8) Spravdi, pry 2x ≠ λ1 + λ2 diahonal\na matrycq x x 0 0 1 2λ λ+ −     ≈ λ λ λ λ λ 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 x x x x− −           + λ λ λ λ λ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 x x x x − − −           [ fiksovanog linijnog kombinaci[g dvox idempotentiv. OtΩe, na pidstavi rivno- sti (1) koΩna matrycq Ui = diag ( x2i, x2i + 1 ) [ linijnog kombinaci[g dvox idem- potentiv: Ui = λ1 1Q i( ) + λ2 2Q i( ) . Iz vlastyvosti (4) vyplyva[, wo Q i 1 ( ) i Q i 2 ( ) , i ≥ 1, moΩna vybraty tak, wob ]x normy buly obmeΩeni konstantog Ω2, qka zaleΩyt\ til\ky vid c i sup | xj | . Tomu dostatn\o poklasty Q1 = ( ) ( )1 1 1� � ∞ Q i , Q2 = ( ) ( )0 1 2� � ∞ Q i , i otryma[mo rivnist\ (8), qka razom iz (7) dovodyt\ lemu81. ZauvaΩennq$1. Zbil\ßennq znaçennq konstanty c v dovedenni lemy81 ne vplyva[ na spravedlyvist\ ]] dovedennq. TakoΩ zrozumilo, wo normy pobudova- nyx idempotentnyx operatoriv zaleΩat\ til\ky vid konstant c i ε. Teorema$1. Diahonal\nyj operator D ≠ λ I + K [ linijnog kombinaci[g tr\ox idempotentnyx operatoriv. Podibnyj do n\oho operator takoΩ [ linij- nog kombinaci[g tr\ox idempotentiv. Dovedennq. Nexaj D = diag ( d1, … , dn , … ) i D ne [ operatorom vyhlqdu λ I + K. Vyberemo v poslidovnosti di, i ≥ 1, dvi zbiΩni pidposlidovnosti dlk i dmk tak, wob limk ld k→∞ – limk md k→∞ = δ ≠ 0 ta ∀ j ∈ N d dl k lj k − →∞ lim < δ 4 i d dm k mj k − →∞ lim < δ 4 . (9) Bez obmeΩennq zahal\nosti moΩna vvaΩaty, wo mnoΩyna Ñ = n k n l n mk k∈ ∀ ∈ ≠ ≠{ }N N : , [ neskinçennog. Poznaçymo ak : = dlk , bk : = dmk ta perepoznaçymo vsi ele- menty z poslidovnosti di, i ∈ Ñ , qk c1, c2, c3, … . Zafiksu[mo odne z rozbyttiv N na nezliçenni mnoΩyny: N = N1 ∪ N2 ∪ … ∪ Np ∪ … , de elementy ki p z Np vporqdkovani za nyΩnim indeksom: k p 1 < k p 2 < k p 3 < … . Todi za lemog81 operator Di vyhlqdu diag c a b a bi k k k ki i i i, , , , , 1 1 2 2 …( ), qkwo c ai ki− 1 > δ 4 , diag c b a b ai k k k ki i i i, , , , , 1 1 2 2 …( ), qkwo c ai ki− 1 ≤ δ 4 , [ linijnog kombinaci[g tr\ox idempotentiv. Bil\ß toho, oskil\ky D obmeΩe- nyj i vykonu[t\sq (9), to konstanty c i ε v lemi81 moΩna vybyraty [dynymy dlq vsix operatoriv D1, D2, D3, … . OtΩe, ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 3 PRO ROZKLAD DIAHONAL|NOHO OPERATORA V LINIJNU KOMBINACIG … 391 Ds = λ1 1Q s( ) + λ2 2Q s( ) + λ3 3Q s( ) , i normy operatoriv Q s 1 ( ) , Q s 2 ( ) , Q s 3 ( ) obmeΩeni çyslom, qke ne zaleΩyt\ vid zna- çennq s (dyv. zauvaΩennq81). Za pobudovog � 1 ∞ Di ≈ D, zvidky bezposeredn\o vyplyva[ isnuvannq rozkladu operatora D v linijnu kom- binacig tr\ox idempotentiv. Oskil\ky operator, podibnyj do idempotentnoho, [ idempotentom, to teore- ma81 spravdΩu[t\sq i dlq operatoriv, podibnyx do diahonal\nyx. Teoremu81 dovedeno. 2. Rozklad samosprqΩenyx diahonal\nyx operatoriv u linijnu kombina- cig çotyr\ox proektoriv. Dali zapys A ≈u B bude oznaçaty, wo isnu[ unitar- nyj operator U takyj, wo A = U BU−1 . Perß niΩ dovodyty osnovnu teoremu punktu, navedemo proste texniçne tverdΩennq dlq ( 2 × 2 ) -matryc\ i dovedemo lemu82, qka [ çastkovym vypadkom teoremy82. TverdΩennq$1. Nexaj a, b ∈ R, a < 0 < b i x ∈ [ a, b ] . Todi pry | x | ≥ ≥ 8| a + b | matrycq diag ( x, a + b – x ) = a P1 + b P2, de P1 i P2 — deqki orto- proektorni matryci. Dovedennq tverdΩennq proste i my joho ne navodymo. Lema$2. Nexaj a1 ≥ a2 ≥ … ≥ an ≥ … — monotonna poslidovnist\ dijsnyx çysel i konstanta F = i i n na a = ∞ →∞∑ −    1 lim < ∞ . Todi dlq bud\-qkoho b ∈ R operator D = diag ( b, a1, a2, a3, … ) [ dijsnog li- nijnog kombinaci[g çotyr\ox ortoproektoriv. Dovedennq. Ideq dovedennq polqha[ v pobudovi diahonal\nyx operatoriv X8 = diag ( x1, x2, x3, … ) i Y = diag ( y1, y2, y3, … ) takyx, wob X = λ1 P1 + λ2 P2, Y = λ3 P3 + λ4 P4 i D ≈u X + Y, de Pi — proektory. Rozib’[mo joho na try çastyny. 1. Vyznaçennq λj i xi . Poklademo c = 10 1F b a i i+ + +    ∈ sup N , λ1 = 2 c, λ2 = 2 1lim n na →∞ − λ , λ3 = 4 c, λ4 = – 4 c. Qkwo b a F n n− + →∞ lim > 0, (10) to isnu[ k ∈ N take, wo b a a a n n i k i n n− + −   →∞ = − →∞∑lim lim 1 2 1 > 0. (11) Nexaj pry nevykonanni umovy (10) k : = 1. U zaleΩnosti vid znaçennq b vvody- mo poslidovnist\ çysel x1, x2, x3, … : x1 = λ1 , qkwo vykonu[t\sq nerivnist\ (10), i x1 = λ2 — v inßyx vypadkax, ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 3 392 V. I. RABANOVYÇ x j2 1+ = λ λ1 2 2+ − x j , j ∈ N, (12) x j2 = a a xj j j2 1 2 2 1− −+ − = i j ia j x = ∑ − − + − 1 2 1 2 11( )( )λ λ , j = 1, … , k – 1, x k2 = a b xk k2 1 2 1− −+ − , x l2 = a a xl l l2 2 2 1 2 1− − −+ − = b a l x i l i+ − − + − = − ∑ 1 2 1 1 2 11( )( )λ λ , l > k . 2. Vlastyvosti xi . Za vyznaçennqm λ λ1 2+ = 2 limn na→∞ , zvidky x j2 = i j i n na a = →∞∑ −    + 1 2 2lim λ , j < k , abo x l2 = b a a a x n n i l i n n− + −    + + − →∞ = − →∞∑lim lim 1 2 1 1 2 1λ λ , l ≥ k. Pry vykonanni nerivnostej (10) i (11) ma[mo x j2 ≥ λ2 i x l2 ≥ λ λ λ1 2 1+ − = λ2 , u protyvnomu razi x l2 ≤ λ λ λ1 2 2+ − = λ1 , l ≥ 1. Qk i pry dovedenni lemy81, pokaΩemo, wo elementy x j2 [ „blyz\kymy” do çysla – x1, a elementy x j2 1+ — do çysla x1 : x xi2 1+ = j i j n n n n n n j i j n n n n a a a c i k b a a a a c i k = →∞ →∞ →∞ = − →∞ →∞ ∑ ∑ −    + ≤ < − + −    + ≤ ≥       1 2 1 2 1 2 5 2 10 lim lim , lim lim lim , / / pry pry x xi2 1 1+ − = λ λ1 2 2 1+ − +( )x xi = 2 2 1lim ( ) n n ia x x →∞ − + ≤ 2 5c/ , i ∈ N . Qk naslidok, otrymu[mo x xi i+ −1 > c i xi ∈ [ λ2, λ1 ] . 3. Pobudova proektoriv Pj . Operator X = diag ( x1, x2, x3, … ) [ linijnog kombinaci[g dvox proektoriv P1 ta P2 : X = λ1 P1 + λ2 P2 . (13) Wob dovesty vlastyvist\ (13), rozklademo matrycg X u prqmu sumu matryc\: X = ( ) ( , ) ( , )x x x x xn n1 2 3 2 2 1� � � �diag diag… …+ . (14) Todi z rivnosti (12) vyplyva[ x xi i2 2 1+ + = λ1 + λ2 . Krim toho, x1 = λ1 abo x1 = = λ2 . Vykorystovugçy tverdΩennq81, otrymu[mo rozklad u linijnu kombinacig dvox proektoriv dlq koΩnoho dodanka z (14). Takym çynom, rivnist\ (13) vyko- nu[t\sq. Teper rozhlqnemo operator D̃ ≈ D : D̃ = diag ( , , , , , , , )a a a b a xk k k1 2 2 1 2 2 1… …− + . Todi diahonal\ni elementy riznyci operatoriv D̃ – X = diag ( , , , )y y y1 2 3 … = : Y magt\ taku vlastyvist\: y yj j2 1 2− + = 0 i y j ∈ [ λ4 ; λ3 ] , j ∈ N. Zvidsy za ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 3 PRO ROZKLAD DIAHONAL|NOHO OPERATORA V LINIJNU KOMBINACIG … 393 tverdΩennqm81 matrycq diag( , )y yj j2 1 2− [ linijnog kombinaci[g dvox proekto- riv z koefici[ntamy λ3 i λ4 . Ce spravedlyvo j dlq prqmo] sumy takyx matryc\: D̃ – X = Y = λ3 P3 + λ4 P4 , D̃ = λ1 P1 + λ2 P2 + λ3 P3 + λ4 P4 . Lemu82 dovedeno. ZauvaΩennq$2. Zbil\ßennq znaçennq konstanty c v dovedenni lemy82 ne vplyva[ na spravedlyvist\ ]] dovedennq. Teorema$2. Diahonal\nyj samosprqΩenyj operator [ dijsnog linijnog kombinaci[g çotyr\ox ortoproektoriv. Dovedennq. Nexaj A = diag ( a1, a2, … , ak , … ) , ai ∈ R. U poslidovnosti a1, a2, … , ak , … vyberemo monotonnu zbiΩnu pidposlidovnist\ amk tak, wob 1 ∞ →∞∑ −a am k mk k lim < ∞ . Rozhlqnemo vypadok, koly amk [ spadnog. Prypustymo, wo j1, j2, … , js , … — vsi natural\ni çysla, qki ne vvijßly do pidposlidovnosti mk, k ∈ N. MoΩna vvaΩaty, wo ]x neskinçenna kil\kist\. Todi za lemog82 dlq koΩnoho s ∈ N ope- rator Ds = diag a a a aj m m ms k k ks s s , , , , 1 2 3 …    , m ki s ∈ Ns , [ linijnog kombinaci[g çotyr\ox proektoriv. Bil\ß toho, vnaslidok obmeΩeno- sti operatora A konstantu c moΩna vzqty [dynog dlq vsix operatoriv Ds (dyv. zauvaΩennq82). Takym çynom, oskil\ky � 1 ∞ Ds ≈u A , to A [ linijnog kombinaci[g çotyr\ox proektoriv, i vypadok, koly amk spada[, rozhlqnuto povnistg. Qkwo Ω amk zrosta[, to poslidovnist\ − am1 , − am2 , − am3 , … spada[ i tomu – A = λ1 P1 + λ2 P2 + λ3 P3 + λ4 P4 . Zvidsy A = – λ1 P1 – λ2 P2 – λ3 P3 – λ4 P4 , i teorema82 [ spravedlyvog i v c\omu vypadku. Teoremu dovedeno. Avtor vyslovlg[ podqku profesoru G. S. Samojlenku za cinni porady i za- uvaΩennq pry roboti nad ci[g tematykog. 1. Wu P. Y. Additive combinations of special operators // Funct. Anal. and Oper. Theory. – 1994. – 30. – P. 337 – 361. 2. Pearcy C., Topping D. M. Sums of small numbers of idempotents // Mich. Math. J. – 1967. – 14. – P. 453 – 465. 3. Brown A., Halmos P. R., Pearcy C. Commutators of operators on Hilbert space // Can. J. Math. – 1965. – 17. – P. 695 – 708. 4. Rabanovyç V. I. Pro rozklad operatora v sumu çotyr\ox idempotentiv // Ukr. mat. Ωurn. – 2004. – 56, # 3. – S. 419 – 424. 5. Rabanovich V. Every matrix is a linear combination of three idempotents // Linear Algebra and Its Appl. – 2004. – 390. – P. 137 – 143. 6. Matsumoto K. Self-adjoint operators as a real sum of 5 projections // Math. Jap. – 1984. – 29. – P. 291 – 294. 7. Nakamura Y. Any Hermitia matrix is a linear combination of four projections // Linear Algebra and Its Appl. – 1984. – 61. – P. 133 – 139. OderΩano 20.04.2004 ISSN 0041-6053. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 3
id umjimathkievua-article-3606
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language Ukrainian
English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:45:39Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/a0/95a9ca3145631567042c1b997b7daba0.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-36062020-03-18T19:59:42Z On the Decomposition of a Diagonal Operator into a Linear Combination of Idempotents or Projectors Про розклад діагонального оператора в лінійну комбінацію ідемпотентів або проекторів Rabanovych, V. I. Рабанович, В. І. For a bounded operator that is not a sum of scalar and compact operators and is similar to a diagonal operator, we prove that it is a linear combination of three idempotents. It is also proved that any self-adjoint diagonal operator is a linear combination of four orthoprojectors with real coefficients. Доведено, що обмежений оператор, який не є сумою скалярного i компактного операторів i подібний до діагонального, є лінійною комбінацією трьох ідемпотентів, а будь-який самоспряжений діагональний оператор є лінійною комбінацією чотирьох ортопроекторів із дійсними коефіцієнтами. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2005-03-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3606 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 57 No. 3 (2005); 388–393 Український математичний журнал; Том 57 № 3 (2005); 388–393 1027-3190 uk en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3606/3943 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3606/3944 Copyright (c) 2005 Rabanovych V. I.
spellingShingle Rabanovych, V. I.
Рабанович, В. І.
On the Decomposition of a Diagonal Operator into a Linear Combination of Idempotents or Projectors
title On the Decomposition of a Diagonal Operator into a Linear Combination of Idempotents or Projectors
title_alt Про розклад діагонального оператора в лінійну комбінацію ідемпотентів або проекторів
title_full On the Decomposition of a Diagonal Operator into a Linear Combination of Idempotents or Projectors
title_fullStr On the Decomposition of a Diagonal Operator into a Linear Combination of Idempotents or Projectors
title_full_unstemmed On the Decomposition of a Diagonal Operator into a Linear Combination of Idempotents or Projectors
title_short On the Decomposition of a Diagonal Operator into a Linear Combination of Idempotents or Projectors
title_sort on the decomposition of a diagonal operator into a linear combination of idempotents or projectors
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3606
work_keys_str_mv AT rabanovychvi onthedecompositionofadiagonaloperatorintoalinearcombinationofidempotentsorprojectors
AT rabanovičví onthedecompositionofadiagonaloperatorintoalinearcombinationofidempotentsorprojectors
AT rabanovychvi prorozkladdíagonalʹnogooperatoravlíníjnukombínacíûídempotentívaboproektorív
AT rabanovičví prorozkladdíagonalʹnogooperatoravlíníjnukombínacíûídempotentívaboproektorív