On a Weak Solution of an Equation for an Evolution Flow with Interaction

We prove that a stochastic differential equation for an evolution flow with interaction whose coefficients do not satisfy the global Lipschitz condition has a weak solution.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2005
Hauptverfasser: Karlikova, M. P., Карликова, М. П.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Russisch
Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2005
Online Zugang:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3651
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Institution

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860509774699823104
author Karlikova, M. P.
Карликова, М. П.
Карликова, М. П.
author_facet Karlikova, M. P.
Карликова, М. П.
Карликова, М. П.
author_sort Karlikova, M. P.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-03-18T20:01:15Z
description We prove that a stochastic differential equation for an evolution flow with interaction whose coefficients do not satisfy the global Lipschitz condition has a weak solution.
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:46:27Z
format Article
fulltext UDK 519.21 M. P. Karlykova (Yn-t matematyky NAN Ukrayn¥, Kyev) O SLABOM REÍENYY URAVNENYQ DLQ ∏VOLGCYONNOHO POTOKA SO VZAYMODEJSTVYEM We prove that a stochastic differential equation for an evolutionary flow with interaction whose coefficients do not satisfy the global Lipschitz condition possesses a weak solution. Dovedeno, wo stoxastyçne dyferencial\ne rivnqnnq dlq evolgcijnoho potoku zi vza[modi[g z,koefici[ntamy, wo ne zadovol\nqgt\ hlobal\nu umovu Lipßycq, ma[ slabkyj rozv’qzok. 1. Vvedenye. V nastoqwej stat\e rassmatryvaetsq sledugwee uravnenye [1] dlq potoka so vzaymodejstvyem: d x ( u, t ) = a ( x ( u, t ), µ t ) d t + b ( x ( u, t ), µ t ) d w ( t ), (1) x ( u, 0 ) = u, t ≥ 0, u ∈ R d , hde µ t = µ 0 ° x ( ⋅, t ) – 1 — sluçajnaq mera, opredelqemaq ravenstvom µ t ( ∆ ) = µ 0 ( u : x ( u, t ) ∈ ∆ ), ∆ ∈ B ( R d ), dlq naçal\noj veroqtnostnoj mer¥ µ 0 . Zdes\ B ( R d ) — borelevskaq σ-alheb- ra v R d . ∏to uravnenye moΩno rassmatryvat\ kak opysanye dvyΩenyq kontynu- al\noj system¥ çastyc v sluçajnoj srede, kohda traektoryy otdel\n¥x çastyc zavysqt ot poloΩenyj ostal\n¥x çastyc. Oboznaçym çerez � prostranstvo veroqtnostn¥x mer v R d y opredelym na nem metryku Vasserßtejna γ ( µ, ν ) = inf ( , ) ( , )κ µ ν κ ∈ ∫∫ − + −Q d u u du d R v v v 1 . Zdes\ Q ( µ, ν ) — mnoΩestvo veroqtnostn¥x mer v R d × R d , ymegwyx µ y ν svoymy proekcyqmy. Yzvestno [2], çto metryka γ sootvetstvuet slaboj sxody- mosty y ( �, γ ) — polnoe separabel\noe metryçeskoe prostranstvo. V [1] dokazan sledugwyj fakt. Teorema 1. Pust\ dlq nekotoroho L > 0 y dlq lgb¥x u1 , u2 ∈ R d , ν1 , ν2 ∈ � || a ( u1 , ν1 ) – a ( u2, ν2 ) || + || b ( u1 , ν1 ) – b ( u2, ν2 ) || ≤ L u u1 2 1 2− +( )γ ν ν( , ) . Tohda uravnenye (1) ymeet edynstvennoe syl\noe reßenye. Dlq stoxastyçeskyx dyfferencyal\n¥x uravnenyj bez vzaymodejstvyq (kohda a y b ne zavysqt ot µ ) suwestvuet druhoe obweprynqtoe uslovye su- westvovanyq y edynstvennosty syl\noho reßenyq [3]: suwestvugt C > 0 y posledovatel\nost\ { LN , N ≥ 1 } takye, çto ∀ u ∈ R d : || a ( u ) || + || b ( u ) || ≤ C u1 +( ) , ∀ u, v ∈ B ( 0, N ) : || a ( u ) – a ( v ) || + || b ( u ) – b ( v ) || ≤ LN || u – v ||. V dannoj stat\e sdelana pop¥tka perenesty πto uslovye na sluçaj uravne- nyj so vzaymodejstvyem. Pry πtom vaΩnug rol\ budet yhrat\ meroznaçn¥j © M. P. KARLYKOVA, 2005 ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7 895 896 M. P. KARLYKOVA process { µ t , t ≥ 0 }, kotor¥j v sootvetstvyy s [1] budem naz¥vat\ πvolgcyon- n¥m processom. 2. Slabaq kompaktnost\ semejstva πvolgcyonn¥x meroznaçn¥x pro- cessov. PreΩde vseho ustanovym nekotor¥e svojstva reßenyj uravnenyq (1). Lemma 1. Pust\ { a α, b α, α ∈ � } udovletvorqgt uslovyg ∃ C > 0 ∀ u ∈ R d, µ ∈ � : ,|| a α ( u, µ ) || + || b α ( u, µ ) || ≤ C u1 +( ) , { x α, α ∈ � } udovletvorqgt uravnenyqm d x α ( u, t ) = a x u t dtt α α αµ( , ),( ) + b x u t dw tt α α αµ( , ), ( )( ) , x α ( u, 0 ) = u, µα t = µα 0 ° x α ( ⋅, t ) – 1 , pryçem semejstvo µ αα 0 , ∈{ }� slabo kompaktno. Tohda: ∀ p > 1 ∃ Cp > 0 : ∀ t ∈ [ 0, 1 ] 1) E sup ( , ) 0 1≤ ≤t p x u tα ≤ C up p1 +( ); 2) E sup ( , ) ( , ) t s t p x u t x u s ≤ ≤ + − δ α α ≤ C up p p1 2+( ) /δ . Dokazatel\stvo. 1. Yspol\zuq neravenstvo Burkxol\dera [3], poluçaem E sup ( , ) 0≤ ≤s t p x u sα ≤ ≤ ′ + ( ) + ( )      ∫ ∫ ≤ ≤ C u a x u s ds b x u dwp p t s p s t t p E E 0 0 0 α α α α α τ αµ τ µ τ( , ), sup ( , ), ( ) ≤ ≤ ′′ + +( ) + −     +( )           ∫ ∫ / C u x u s ds p p x u s dsp p t p p t p E E 0 0 2 2 1 1 1α α( , ) ( , ) ≤ ≤ ′′′ + +         ∫ ≤ ≤ C u x u dsp p t s p 0 0 1E sup ( , ) τ α τ , otkuda sohlasno lemme Hronuolla E sup ( , ) 0 1 ≤ ≤ +( ) s t p x u sα ≤ ′′′ +( ) ′′′ C u ep p C tp1 . Tohda E sup ( , ) 0 1≤ ≤t p x u tα ≤ C up p1 +( ). 2. Analohyçno, E sup ( , ) ( , ) t s t p x u t x u s ≤ ≤ + − δ α α ≤ ≤ ′ ( ) + ( )      − + ≤ ≤ + ∫ ∫C a x u d b x u dwp p t t p t s t t s p δ τ µ τ τ µ τ δ α α τ α δ α α τ α1 E E( , ), sup ( , ), ( ) ≤ ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7 O SLABOM REÍENYY URAVNENYQ DLQ ∏VOLGCYONNOHO POTOKA … 897 ≤ ′′ +( ) + −     +( )        − + + ∫ ∫ / C x u d p p x u dp p t t p p t t p δ τ τ τ τ δ α δ α1 2 2 1 1 1E E( , ) ( , ) ≤ ≤ ′′′ +( )/ − + ∫C x u dp p t t p δ τ τ δ α2 1 1 ( , ) ≤ C up p p1 2+( ) /δ . Lemma dokazana. Nam potrebuetsq kryteryj slaboj kompaktnosty semejstva sluçajn¥x πle- mentov v C ( [ 0, 1 ], � ) yz [1]. Rassmotrym dve posledovatel\nosty funkcyj { fn , n ≥ 1 } y { gN , n ≥ 1 } v Cb ( R d ) takye, çto: 1) f1 ≡ 1 ∀ n ≥ 2 : fn ∈ C0 ( R d ); 2) ∀ n ≥ 1 : max R d fn ≤ 1; 3) ∀ ϕ ∈ C0 ( R d ) : max R d ϕ ≤ 1 ∃ f knk , ≥{ }1 : max R d k fnϕ − → 0, k → ∞; 4) ∀ x ∈ R d , n ≥ 1 : 0 ≤ gn ( x ) ≤ 1; 5) ∀ x ∈ R d , || x || ≤ n : gn ( x ) = 0 ; 6) ∀ x ∈ R d , || x || ≥ n + 1 : gn ( x ) = 1. Lemma 2 [1]. Semejstvo { ξα , α ∈ � } sluçajn¥x πlementov v C ( [ 0, 1 ], � ) slabo kompaktno tohda y tol\ko tohda, kohda: 1) dlq kaΩdoho k ≥ 1 semejstvo sluçajn¥x processov ξ αα , ,fk ∈{ }� slabo kompaktno v C ( [ 0, 1 ] ); 2) semejstvo ξ αα , , ,g kk ∈ ≥{ }� 1 slabo kompaktno v C ( [ 0, 1 ] ); 3) ∀ t ∈ [ 0, 1 ] ∀ ε > 0 : sup ( ), α αξ ε ∈ >{ } � P t gk , k → ∞. Zdes\ yspol\zovano oboznaçenye 〈 µ, f 〉 = R d f u du∫ ( ) ( )µ . Dalee budem v¥byrat\ fk udovletvorqgwymy uslovyg Lypßyca s postoqn- n¥my Ak, gk — s obwej postoqnnoj A. Pryvedenn¥j kryteryj pozvolqet ustanovyt\ slabug kompaktnost\ semej- stva πvolgcyonn¥x processov, sootvetstvugwyx uravnenyg (1), v termynax eho koπffycyentov. Teorema 2. V uslovyqx lemm¥ 1 semejstvo meroznaçn¥x processov { µα ⋅ , α ∈ � } slabo kompaktno v C ( [ 0, 1 ], � ). Dokazatel\stvo. Proverym uslovyq lemm¥ 2. 1. Dlq slaboj kompaktnosty semejstva sluçajn¥x processov { ξ α, α ∈ � } v C ( [ 0, 1 ] ) dostatoçno, çtob¥ [4] ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7 898 M. P. KARLYKOVA sup ( ) α αξ ∈ ≥{ } � P 0 N → 0, N → ∞, sup sup ( ) ( ) α δ α α δ ξ ξ ε ∈ ≤ ≤ + − >     � 1 P t s t t s → 0, δ → 0 +. V rassmatryvaemom sluçae P µα 0 , f Nk ≥{ } = ÷ µα 0 , f Nk ≥{ } → 0, N → ∞, ravnomerno po α, tak kak µα 0 , fk ≤ sup R d fk ≤ 1. Ocenym teper\ s pomow\g lemm¥ 2 dlq p > 2 E sup , , t s t s k t k p f f ≤ ≤ + − δ α αµ µ = = E sup ( , ) ( , ) ( ) t s t k k p d f x u s f x u t du ≤ ≤ + ∫ ( ) − ( )( ) δ α α αµ R 0 ≤ ≤ E EA x u t x u s duk K t s t p k ∫ ≤ ≤ + −      sup ( , ) ( , ) ( ) δ α α αµ0 ≤ ≤ A C u duk p K p p p k ∫ +( ) /1 2 0δ µα ( ) ≤ A uk p u K p p k sup ∈ +( ) /1 2δ , hde Kk — kompakt, na kotorom sosredotoçena fk . Otsgda sup sup , , α δ α α δ µ µ ε ∈ ≤ ≤ + − >     � 1 P t s t s k t kf f ≤ ≤ 1 1 2 δ ε δ A uk p u K p p pk sup ∈ +( ) / → 0, δ → 0. Sledovatel\no, µ αα ⋅ ∈{ }, ,fk � slabo kompaktn¥ v C ( [ 0, 1 ] ). 2. Ymeem µα 0 , gk ≤ 1, poπtomu pervoe uslovye slaboj kompaktnosty v C ( [ 0, 1 ] ) dlq µ αα ⋅ ∈ ≥{ }, , ,g kk � 1 v¥polneno. Dalee, sup , , t s t s k t kg g ≤ ≤ + − δ α αµ µ ≤ A x u s x u t du Kε α α αµ∫ −( , ) ( , ) ( )0 + ε 2 , hde Kε — takoj kompakt, çto ∀ α ∈ � : µα ε0 R d K\( ) < ε 2 . Tohda, kak y v pred¥duwem punkte, 1 δ µ µ ε δ α αP sup , , t s t s k t kg g ≤ ≤ + − >      ≤ ≤ 1 20δ µ ε δ α α α ε P sup ( , ) ( , ) ( ) t s t K x u s x u t du ≤ ≤ + ∫ − >         → 0, δ → 0, ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7 O SLABOM REÍENYY URAVNENYQ DLQ ∏VOLGCYONNOHO POTOKA … 899 ravnomerno po α. Sledovatel\no, µ αα ⋅ ∈ ≥{ }, , ,g kk � 1 slabo kompaktno v C ( [ 0, 1 ] ). 3. Proverym tret\e uslovye lemm¥ 2: P µ εα t kg, >{ } ≤ P µ εα α 0 u x u t k: ( , ) ≥( ) >{ } ≤ ≤ P µ εα α 0 2 u u N x u t k: , ( , )≥ ≥( ) >{ } + + P µ εα α 0 2 u u N x u t k: , ( , )≤ ≥( ) >{ } ≤ ≤ P µ εα 0 2 u u N: ≥( ) >{ } + P u N x u t du k ≤∫ >         α αµ ε( , ) ( ) 2 0 2 2 ≤ ≤ ÷ µ εα 0 2 u u N: ≥( ) >{ } + C u du k u N2 2 0 2 1 ≤∫ +( )µ ε α ( ) . Poslednee neravenstvo sleduet yz lemm¥ 1. V¥byraq N tak, çtob¥ dlq vsex α ∈ � v¥polnqlos\ µα 0 u u N: ≥( ) < ε 2 , poluçaem sup , α αµ ε ∈ >{ } � P t kg → 0, k → ∞. Teorema dokazana. Teorema 3. Pust\ v¥polnen¥ uslovyq lemm¥ 1. Tohda dlq lgboho nabora { u1 , u2 , … , uN } ⊂ R d semejstvo x u x u x uN α α α α( , ), ( , ), , ( , ),1 2⋅ ⋅ … ⋅ ∈{ }� slabo kompaktno v C ( [ 0, 1 ], R d N ). Dokazatel\stvo sleduet yz ocenok lemm¥ 1 analohyçno dokazatel\stvu teorem¥ 2. 3. Suwestvovanye slaboho reßenyq. Pust\ a y b udovletvorqgt uslo- vyg A): ∃ C > 0, { LN , n ≥ 1 }, ∀ u ∈ R d, µ ∈ � : || a ( u, µ ) || + || b ( u, µ ) || ≤ C u1 +( ) , ∀ u, v ∈ R d, µ, ν ∈ � : || a ( u, µ ) – a ( v, ν ) || + || b ( u, µ ) – b ( v, ν ) || ≤ ≤ L uN − +( )v γ µ ν( , ) . Lemma 3. Pust\ a, b udovletvorqgt uslovyg A). Pust\, krome toho, { x α, α ∈ � } udovletvorqgt uravnenyg (1) s naçal\n¥my meramy µα 0 , pryçem semejstvo µ αα 0 , ∈{ }� slabo kompaktno. Tohda dlq lgboho kompakta K ⊂ R d ∀ ε > 0 ∃ C ( ε ) > 0 ∀ u, v ∈ K, t ∈ [ 0, 1 ] : E x u t x tα α( , ) ( , )− v ≤ ε + C u( )ε − v . ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7 900 M. P. KARLYKOVA Dokazatel\stvo. Pust\ N > 0. Oboznaçym σα u = inf t x u t≥{ 0: ( , )α ≥ ≥ N u1 +( )}, σ α u,v = σα u ∧ σα v . Tohda v sylu lemm¥ 1 P σα u,v ≤{ }1 ≤ P sup ( , ) 0 1 1 ≤ ≤ ≥ +( )     t x u t N uα + + P sup ( , ) 0 1 1 ≤ ≤ ≥ +( )     t x t Nα v v ≤ C u N u 2 2 2 2 1 1 +( ) +( ) + C N 2 2 2 2 1 1 +( ) +( ) v v ≤ 2 2 2 C N . Dalee E x u t x tu u α α α ασ σ, ,, ,∧( ) − ∧( )v vv 2 ≤ ≤ 3 Eu a x u s a x s ds t s s u − +    ( ) − ( ) ∧ ∫v v v 2 0 2 σ α α α α α µ µ , ( , ), ( , ), + + E 0 2t s s u b x u s b x s dw s ∧ ∫ ( ) − ( )( )    σ α α α α α µ µ , ( , ), ( , ), ( ) v v ≤ ≤ 3 22 2 0 2 u L x u s x s dsN t u u− + ∧ − ∧( )     ∫v vv vE α α α ασ σ( , ) ,, , , otkuda sohlasno lemme Hronuolla E x u t x tu u α α α ασ σ, ,, ,∧( ) − ∧( )v vv 2 ≤ C N u eC N t( ) ( )− v 2 . Tohda E x u t x tα α( , ) ( , )− v ≤ E x u t x tu u u α α α α ασ σ σ, ,, , ,∧( ) − ∧( ) >{ }v v vv ÷ 1 + + E x u t x t u α α ασ( , ) ( , ) ,− ≤{ }v v÷ 1 ≤ ≤ C N u eC N t( ) ( )− v 2 + C u C N 2 2 2 2 22 2+ +( )v ≤ ≤ C N e uC N( ) ( ) − v + C N u1 + +( )v . V¥byraq N tak, çtob¥ v¥polnqlos\ C N u1 + +( )v < ε, poluçaem trebuemoe neravenstvo. Lemma dokazana. Lemma 4. Pust\ µ0 = k N k uc k=∑ 1 δ , hde ck > 0, k = 1, … , N, k N kc=∑ 1 = 1. Pust\, krome toho, a, b udovletvorqgt uslovyg A). Tohda uravnenye (1) ymeet edynstvennoe reßenye. Dokazatel\stvo. Uravnenye (1) v dannom sluçae ymeet vyd d x u tk( , ) = a x u t c dtk i N i x u ti ( , ), ( , ) = ∑   1 δ + b x u t c dw tk i N i x u ti ( , ), ( )( , ) = ∑   1 δ , (2) k = 1, … , N; ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7 O SLABOM REÍENYY URAVNENYQ DLQ ∏VOLGCYONNOHO POTOKA … 901 d x u t( , ) = a x u t c dt i N i x u ti ( , ), ( , ) = ∑   1 δ + b x u t c dw t i N i x u ti ( , ), ( )( , ) = ∑   1 δ , u ∈ R d . (3) Na x ( uk , t ), k = 1, … , N, ymeem systemu uravnenyj (2), koπffycyent¥ ko- toroj ˜ ( , , , )a u u uk N1 2 … = a u ck i N i ui , = ∑   1 δ , ˜ ( , , , )b u u uk N1 2 … = b u ck i N i ui , = ∑   1 δ udovletvorqgt uslovyg lynejnoho rosta y lokal\nomu uslovyg Lypßyca. Sledovatel\no, πta systema ymeet edynstvennoe reßenye. Krome toho, yz ne- prer¥vnosty x ( ui , ⋅ ) sleduet, çto µ⋅ = i N i x uc i = ⋅∑ 1 δ ( , ) ∈ C ( [ 0, 1 ], � ). Dlq ostal\n¥x u ∉ { u1 , … , un } koπffycyent¥ uravnenyq (3) takΩe budut udovletvorqt\ lokal\nomu uslovyg Lypßyca y uslovyg lynejnoho rosta, a krome toho, budut neprer¥vn¥ po t. Sledovatel\no, (3) takΩe budet ymet\ reßenye. Lemma dokazana. Lemma 5. Pust\ � 1 , �2 , … , �N — poln¥e metryçeskye prostranstva. Semejstvo sluçajn¥x πlementov ξ ξ ξ αα α α 1 2, , , ,…( ) ∈{ }N � slabo kompaktno v,,,,�1 × �2 × … × �N tohda y tol\ko tohda, kohda ξ αα 1 , ∈{ }� , … … , ξ αα N , ∈{ }� slabo kompaktn¥ v �1 , … , �N sootvetstvenno. Dokazatel\stvo standartno y poπtomu ne pryvodytsq. Analohyçno sluçag uravnenyq bez vzaymodejstvyq vvedem sledugwee opredelenye. Opredelenye. Uravnenye ( 1 ) ymeet slaboe reßenye, esly najdutsq: veroqtnostnoe prostranstvo ( Ω , F, P ), neub¥vagwee semejstvo σ-alhebr Ft t, ,∈[ ]{ }0 1 , F t-sohlasovann¥j neprer¥vn¥j po ( u, t ) sluçajn¥j process ˜( , )x u t y vynerovskyj Ft-martynhal w̃ takye, çto v¥polneno (1). Teorema 4. Pust\ koπffycyent¥ a, b udovletvorqgt uslovyg A ). Toh- da uravnenye (1) ymeet slaboe reßenye. Dokazatel\stvo. Pust\ µ0 n — dyskretn¥e mer¥ y µ0 n ⇒ µ0 , n → ∞ . So- hlasno lemme 4 dlq nyx suwestvugt reßenyq uravnenyq (1). Oboznaçym yx x n ( ⋅, t ). V sylu teorem¥ 2 semejstvo meroznaçn¥x processov µ⋅ ≥{ }n n, 1 slabo kompaktno v C ( [ 0, 1 ], � ), a sohlasno teoreme 3 semejstvo x u x un n( , ), ( , )1 2⋅ ⋅{ , … … , x u nn N( , ),⋅ ≥ }1 slabo kompaktno v C ( [ 0, 1 ], R d N ) dlq lgb¥x { u1 , u2 , … … , uN } ⊂ R d . Pust\ (ne bolee çem sçetnoe) mnoΩestvo U — mnoΩestvo toçek v R d , v kotor¥x sosredotoçen¥ µ0 n , n ≥ 1. Tohda sohlasno lemme 5 dlq lgboho nabora { u1 , u2 , … , uN } ⊂ U semejstvo µ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ … ⋅{ n n n n Nx u x u x u, ( , ), ( , ), , ( , )1 2 , w n⋅ ≥ }, 1 slabo kompaktno v C ( [ 0, 1 ], � × R d N× R d ). Yspol\zuq dyaho- nal\n¥j metod Kantora, moΩno v¥brat\ podposledovatel\nost\ yndeksov nk , k ≥ 1, takug, çto ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7 902 M. P. KARLYKOVA µ⋅ ⋅⋅ … ⋅( ) ≥{ }n n n N k k kx u x u w n, ( , ), , ( , ), ,1 1 slabo sxodytsq dlq lgboho nabora { u1 , u2 , … , uN } ⊂ U. Oboznaçym ee tak Ωe, kak ysxodnug. Rassmotrym predel πtoj posledovatel\nosty µ t tt y u t u U t w t, , , ˜( , ), , , , ˜ , ,∈[ ] ∈ ∈[ ] ∈[ ]( )0 1 0 1 0 1 . PreΩde vseho pokaΩem, çto w̃⋅ — vynerovskyj martynhal otnosytel\no potoka σ -alhebr Ft = σ µ˜ ( ), , ˜( , ), ,w s y u s u U s ts ∈ ≤{ }. Dlq lgboj ϕ ∈ ∈ Cb ( R d k ( 1 + m ) × � k ) y τ1 , τ2 , … , τk ≤ s, u1 , … , um ∈ U rassmotrym Ee w w y u y ui w t w s k m kk λ τ τϕ τ τ µ µ τ τ˜ ( ) ˜ ( ) ˜ ( ), , ˜ ( ), , , , ˜( , ), , ˜( , )−( ) … … …( )1 1 11 = = lim ( ), , ( ), , , , ( , ), , ( , )( ) ( ) n i w t w s k n n n n m ke w w x u x u k→∞ −( ) … … …( )E λ τ τϕ τ τ µ µ τ τ1 1 11 = = e w w x u x ut s n k n n n n m kk − − →∞ / … … …( )λ τ τϕ τ τ µ µ τ τ 2 1 2 1 1 1 ( ) lim ( ), , ( ), , , , ( , ), , ( , )E = = e w w y u y ut s k m kk − − / … … …( )λ τ τϕ τ τ µ µ τ τ 2 1 2 1 1 1 ( ) ˜ ( ), , ˜ ( ), , , , ˜( , ), , ˜( , )E , s ≤ t, otkuda sleduet, çto w̃ — vynerovskyj Ft - martynhal. Rassmotrym uravnenye dlq x̃ : dx u t˜( , ) = a x u t dtt˜( , ), µ( ) + b x u t dw tt˜( , ), ˜ ( )µ( ) , (4) ˜( , )x u 0 = u. Otmetym, çto πto uravnenye bez vzaymodejstvyq, tak kak process µt{ } sejças yzvesten. V sylu uslovyq A) ono ymeet edynstvennoe reßenye, neprer¥vnoe po u, t [3]. Dlq u ∈ U v¥raΩenyq x n ( u, t ) – u – 0 t n s na x u s ds∫ ( )( , ), µ – 0 t n s nb x u s dw s∫ ( )( , ), ( )µ slabo sxodqtsq k ˜( , )y u t – u – 0 t sa y u s ds∫ ( )˜( , ), µ – 0 t sb y u s dw s∫ ( )˜( , ), ˜ ( )µ . S druhoj storon¥, πty v¥raΩenyq ravn¥ 0, poπtomu v sylu edynstvennosty re- ßenyq (4) dlq u ∈ U ˜( , )y u t = ˜( , )x u t p. n. Zametym dalee, çto tak kak µ0 n ⇒ µ0 , n → ∞, to γ µ µt x t, ˜( , )0 1� ⋅( )− = lim , ˜( , ) k t k x t →∞ −⋅( )γ µ µ0 1� s veroqtnost\g 1. V svog oçered\ yz-za sovmestnoj slaboj sxodymosty µ n y x n na πlementax yz U E γ µ µt k x t, ˜( , )0 1� ⋅( )− = E γ µ µt k y t, ˜( , )0 1� ⋅( )− = lim , ( , ) k t n k nx t →∞ −⋅( )E γ µ µ0 1� . Ocenym E γ µ µt n k nx t, ( , )0 1� ⋅( )− ≤ ε + E K n nx u t x t du d ε κ 2 ∫∫ −( , ) ( , ) ( , )v v , hde Kε — takoj kompakt, çto ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7 O SLABOM REÍENYY URAVNENYQ DLQ ∏VOLGCYONNOHO POTOKA … 903 ∀ n : µ0 n d KR \( ) < ε 2 , κ ∈ Q n kµ µ0 0,( ) . V¥berem κ tak, çtob¥ Rd u u du d∫∫ − + − v v v 1 κ( , ) ≤ 2 0 0γ µ µn k,( ). Tohda sohlasno lemme 3 E γ µ µt n k nx t, ( , )0 1� ⋅( )− ≤ 2 ε + 2 1 0 0C u u K n k( ) sup , , ε γ µ µ εv v ∈ + −( ) ( ). V¥byraq snaçala ε, zatem k, a zatem n, poluçaem E γ µ µt x t, ˜( , )0 1� ⋅( )− = 0, otkuda sleduet, çto µt = µ0 1� ˜( , )x t⋅ − , t. e. x̃ qvlqetsq slab¥m reßenyem uravnenyq (1). Teorema dokazana. 1. Dorogovtsev A. A., Kotelenez P. Stochastic flows with interaction and random measures. – Kluwer Acad. Publ., 2004. – 186 p. 2. Dudley R. M. Real analysis and probability. – Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002. – 566 p. 3. Kunita H. Stochastic flows and stochastic differential equations. – Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997. – 360 p. 4. Byllynhsly P. Sxodymost\ veroqtnostn¥x mer. – M.: Nauka, 1977. – 352 s. Poluçeno 30.04.2004 ISSN 1027-3190. Ukr. mat. Ωurn., 2005, t. 57, # 7
id umjimathkievua-article-3651
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language rus
English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:46:27Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/44/d9f9efca7c665001e5d958a640ca9844.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-36512020-03-18T20:01:15Z On a Weak Solution of an Equation for an Evolution Flow with Interaction О слабом решении уравнения для эволюционного потока со взаимодействием Karlikova, M. P. Карликова, М. П. Карликова, М. П. We prove that a stochastic differential equation for an evolution flow with interaction whose coefficients do not satisfy the global Lipschitz condition has a weak solution. Доведено, що стохастичне диференціальне рівняння для еволюційного потоку зі взаємодією з коефіцієнтами, що не задовольняють глобальну умову Ліпшиця, має слабкий розв&#039;язок. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2005-07-25 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3651 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 57 No. 7 (2005); 895–903 Український математичний журнал; Том 57 № 7 (2005); 895–903 1027-3190 rus en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3651/4032 https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3651/4033 Copyright (c) 2005 Karlikova M. P.
spellingShingle Karlikova, M. P.
Карликова, М. П.
Карликова, М. П.
On a Weak Solution of an Equation for an Evolution Flow with Interaction
title On a Weak Solution of an Equation for an Evolution Flow with Interaction
title_alt О слабом решении уравнения для эволюционного потока со взаимодействием
title_full On a Weak Solution of an Equation for an Evolution Flow with Interaction
title_fullStr On a Weak Solution of an Equation for an Evolution Flow with Interaction
title_full_unstemmed On a Weak Solution of an Equation for an Evolution Flow with Interaction
title_short On a Weak Solution of an Equation for an Evolution Flow with Interaction
title_sort on a weak solution of an equation for an evolution flow with interaction
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/3651
work_keys_str_mv AT karlikovamp onaweaksolutionofanequationforanevolutionflowwithinteraction
AT karlikovamp onaweaksolutionofanequationforanevolutionflowwithinteraction
AT karlikovamp onaweaksolutionofanequationforanevolutionflowwithinteraction
AT karlikovamp oslabomrešeniiuravneniâdlâévolûcionnogopotokasovzaimodejstviem
AT karlikovamp oslabomrešeniiuravneniâdlâévolûcionnogopotokasovzaimodejstviem
AT karlikovamp oslabomrešeniiuravneniâdlâévolûcionnogopotokasovzaimodejstviem