On On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$

UDC 517.5 We prove some new estimates useful in applications  for the approximation of certain classes of functions characterized by the generalized continuity modulus from the space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$ by partial sums of the Jacobi – Dunkl series. For t...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2022
Автори: Tyr, O., Daher, R.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Англійська
Опубліковано: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2022
Онлайн доступ:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/6275
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Репозитарії

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860512315866087424
author Tyr, O.
Daher, R.
Tyr, O.
Daher, R.
author_facet Tyr, O.
Daher, R.
Tyr, O.
Daher, R.
author_sort Tyr, O.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2022-12-17T13:38:56Z
description UDC 517.5 We prove some new estimates useful in applications  for the approximation of certain classes of functions characterized by the generalized continuity modulus from the space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$ by partial sums of the Jacobi – Dunkl series. For this purpose, we use the generalized Jacobi – Dunkl translation operator obtained  by Vinogradov in the monograph [Theory of approximation of functions of real variable, Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1960) (in Russian)].
doi_str_mv 10.37863/umzh.v74i10.6275
first_indexed 2026-03-24T03:26:50Z
format Article
fulltext DOI: 10.37863/umzh.v74i10.6275 UDC 517.5 O. Tyr1, R. Daher (Univ. Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco) ON THE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION IN THE WEIGHTED SPACE \BbbL (\bfitalpha ,\bfitbeta ) \bftwo ПРО НАБЛИЖЕННЯ ФУНКЦIЙ ЗА ДОПОМОГОЮ РОЗКЛАДIВ ЯКОБI – ДАНКЛА У ВАГОВОМУ ПРОСТОРI \BbbL (\bfitalpha ,\bfitbeta ) \bftwo We prove some new estimates useful in applications for the approximation of certain classes of functions characterized by the generalized continuity modulus from the space \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 by partial sums of the Jacobi – Dunkl series. For this purpose, we use the generalized Jacobi – Dunkl translation operator obtained by Vinogradov in the monograph [Theory of approximation of functions of real variable, Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1960) (in Russian)]. Доведено деякi новi оцiнки, кориснi в застосуваннях, для наближень певних класiв функцiй, що характеризуються узагальненим модулем неперервностi з простору \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 , частковими сумами рядiв Якобi – Данкла. З цiєю метою використано узагальнений оператор трансляцiї Якобi – Данкла, що був отриманий Виноградовим у монографiї [Theory of approximation of functions of real variable. Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1960) (in Russian)]. 1. Introduction. It is well-known that many problems for partial differential equations are reduced to a power series expansion of the desired solution in terms of special functions or orthogonal polynomials (such as Laguerre, Hermite, Jacobi, etc. polynomials). In particular, this is associated with the separation of variables as applied to problems in mathematical physics (see, e.g., [10, 11]). In [2], Abilov et al. proved two useful estimates for the Fourier transform in the space of square integrable functions on certain classes of functions characterized by the generalized continuity modulus, using a translation operator. In this paper, we also discuss this subject. More specially, we prove some estimates (similar to those proved in [2]) in certain classes of functions characterized by a generalized continuity modulus and connected with the discrete Jacobi – Dunkl transform associated with the Jacobi – Dunkl operator defined on \BbbT = [ - \pi /2, \pi /2] by \Lambda \alpha ,\beta f(\theta ) := d d\theta f(\theta ) + \scrA \prime \alpha ,\beta (\theta ) \scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta ) f(\theta ) - f( - \theta ) 2 , f \in \scrC 1 \Bigl( \Bigr] - \pi 2 , \pi 2 \Bigl[ \Bigr) , where \alpha \geq \beta \geq - 1 2 , \alpha \not = - 1 2 . This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we state some basic notions and results from the discrete harmonic analysis associated with the Jacobi – Dunkl transform that will be needed through- out this paper. Some estimates are proved in Section 3. 2. Preliminaries. In this section, we will recall some properties of Jacobi and Jacobi – Dunkl polynomials, we develop some results from the discrete harmonic analysis related to the differential- difference operator \Lambda \alpha ,\beta . Further details can be found in [3 – 5, 7, 8, 12]. In the following, we fix parameters \alpha and \beta subject to the constraints 1 Corresponding author, e-mail: otywac@hotmail.fr. c\bigcirc O. TYR, R. DAHER, 2022 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 1427 1428 O. TYR, R. DAHER \alpha \geq \beta \geq - 1 2 , \alpha \not = - 1 2 , and set \rho = \alpha + \beta + 1. The Gauss hypergeometric function 2F1(a, b; c; z) is defined by 2F1(a, b; c; z) := +\infty \sum n=0 (a)n(b)n (c)nn! zn, | z| < 1, where a, b, c, z \in \BbbC with c /\in \BbbZ - and (a)n is the Pochhammer symbol given by (a)n := \left\{ a(a+ 1) . . . (a+ n - 1) if n \in \BbbN \ast , 1 if n = 0, where \BbbN \ast = \{ 1, 2, . . .\} . The Jacobi polynomials \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ), n \in \BbbN , \theta \in \BbbT , are defined by \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) := \scrR (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}(2\theta )) = 2F1 \bigl( - n, n+ \rho ;\alpha + 1; \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}2 \theta \bigr) with \scrR (\alpha ,\beta ) n (x), n \in \BbbN , is the normalized Jacobi polynomial of degree n such that \scrR (\alpha ,\beta ) n (1) = 1. Note that, for all n \in \BbbN , we have \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \leq 1 \forall \theta \in \BbbT (1) and \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n ( - \theta ) = \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) \forall \theta \in \BbbT . (2) The Jacobi operator \Delta \alpha ,\beta defined on \scrC 2 \Bigl( \Bigr] 0, \pi 2 \Bigl[ \Bigr) is given by \Delta \alpha ,\beta := d2 d\theta 2 + \scrA \prime \alpha ,\beta \scrA \alpha ,\beta d d\theta with \scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta ) := \left\{ 22\rho (\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n} | \theta | )2\alpha +1(\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s} \theta )2\beta +1 if \theta \in \Bigr] - \pi 2 , \pi 2 \Bigl[ \setminus \{ 0\} , 0 if \theta = 0. For all n \in \BbbN , \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n is the unique even \scrC \infty -solution on \Bigr] - \pi 2 , \pi 2 \Bigl[ of the differential equation \Delta \alpha ,\beta f = - \lambda 2nf, f(0) = 1, f \prime (0) = 0, where \lambda n = \lambda (\alpha ,\beta )n := 2\mathrm{s}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{n}(n) \sqrt{} | n| (| n| + \rho ), n \in \BbbZ . The Jacobi function \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n , n \in \BbbN , satisfies the following inequalities. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 ON THE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION . . . 1429 Lemma 1. The following inequalities are valid for Jacobi functions \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n : a) for \theta \in (0, \pi /4], we have 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) \leq c1\lambda 2 n\theta 2, (3) b) for every \gamma > 0, there is a number c2 = c2(\gamma , \alpha , \beta ) > 0 such that, for all n and \theta with \gamma < n\theta < \pi n 4 , we obtain \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \leq c2(n\theta ) - \alpha - 1/2. (4) Proof. See [9] (Proposition 3.5 and Lemma 3.1). The Jacobi – Dunkl operator \Lambda \alpha ,\beta is defined by \Lambda \alpha ,\beta f(\theta ) := d d\theta f(\theta ) + \scrA \prime \alpha ,\beta (\theta ) \scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta ) f(\theta ) - f( - \theta ) 2 , f \in \scrC 1 \Bigl( \Bigr] - \pi 2 , \pi 2 \Bigl[ \Bigr) , with \scrA \prime \alpha ,\beta (\theta ) \scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta ) = (2\alpha + 1) \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t} \theta + (2\beta + 1) \mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n} \theta , \theta \in \Bigr] \pi 2 , \pi 2 \Bigl[ \setminus \{ 0\} . From [7], for all n \in \BbbZ , the differential-difference equation \Lambda \alpha ,\beta f(\theta ) = i\lambda nf(\theta ), n \in \BbbZ , f(0) = 1, admits a unique \scrC \infty -solution \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) on \Bigr] - \pi 2 , \pi 2 \Bigl[ . It is related to the Jacobi polynomial and to its derivative by \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) := \left\{ \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (\theta ) - i \lambda n d d\theta \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (\theta ) if n \in \BbbZ \ast , 1 if n = 0. We note that, for all n \in \BbbZ and \theta \in \BbbT , we have \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) - n (\theta ) = \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n ( - \theta ) = \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ), (5)\bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \leq 1, and, for all f and g such that \int \pi 2 - \pi 2 \Lambda \alpha ,\beta f(\theta )g(\theta )\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta exists, we obtain \pi 2\int - \pi 2 \Lambda \alpha ,\beta f(\theta )g(\theta )\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta = - \pi 2\int - \pi 2 f(\theta )\Lambda \alpha ,\beta g(\theta )\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta . (6) For all n, p \in \BbbZ , we have the orthogonality formula given by (see [7]) ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 1430 O. TYR, R. DAHER \pi 2\int - \pi 2 \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) p (\theta )\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta = \Bigl( w(\alpha ,\beta ) n \Bigr) - 1 \delta n,p, (7) where w(\alpha ,\beta ) n = \left( \pi 2\int - \pi 2 \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| 2\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta \right) - 1 , w (\alpha ,\beta ) 0 = \Gamma (\rho + 1) 22\rho \Gamma (\alpha + 1)\Gamma (\beta + 1) and w(\alpha ,\beta ) n = (2| n| + \rho )\Gamma (\alpha + | n| + 1)\Gamma (\rho + | n| ) 22\rho +1(\Gamma (\alpha + 1))2\Gamma (| n| + 1)\Gamma (\beta + | n| + 1) \forall n \in \BbbZ \ast . We obtain the following asymptotic equality as n\rightarrow +\infty : w(\alpha ,\beta ) n \asymp | n| 2\alpha +1 22\rho (\Gamma (\alpha + 1))2 . By using the relation (see [7]) d d\theta \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (\theta ) = - \lambda 2n 4(\alpha + 1) \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}(2\theta )\varphi (\alpha +1,\beta +1) | n| - 1 (\theta ), the function \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n can be written in the form \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) = \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (\theta ) + i \lambda n 4(\alpha + 1) \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}(2\theta )\varphi (\alpha +1,\beta +1) | n| - 1 (\theta ). (8) Let \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 denote the space of square integrable functions f(\theta ) on the closed interval \BbbT with the weight function \scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta ) and the norm \| f\| = \sqrt{} \pi 2\int - \pi 2 | f(\theta )| 2\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta . We define the weighted spaces l2(\BbbZ ) := l2 \Bigl( \BbbZ , w(\alpha ,\beta ) n \Bigr) by l2(\BbbZ ) = \Biggl\{ (fn)n\in \BbbZ : \BbbZ - \rightarrow \BbbC : +\infty \sum n= - \infty | fn| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n < +\infty \Biggr\} . The Jacobi – Dunkl expansion of a function f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 is defined by (see [6, 7]) f(\theta ) = +\infty \sum n= - \infty \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n \forall \theta \in \BbbT , (9) ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 ON THE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION . . . 1431 where \scrF f(n) := \pi 2\int - \pi 2 f(\theta )\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta \forall n \in \BbbZ . The sequence \{ \scrF f(n), n \in \BbbZ \} is called the discrete Jacobi – Dunkl transform of f. For n \in \BbbN , we denote the partial sum of (9) by \scrS fn(\theta ) := n\sum k= - n \scrF f(k)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) k (\theta )w (\alpha ,\beta ) k \forall \theta \in \BbbT . From (7), we get, for all f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 (see [6]), \mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m} n\rightarrow +\infty \bigm\| \bigm\| \bigm\| \scrS fn - f \bigm\| \bigm\| \bigm\| = 0. We state some properties of the discrete Jacobi – Dunkl transform \scrF (see [7]). Theorem 1 (Plancherel formula). If f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 , then \scrF f belongs to l2(\BbbZ ) and we have \| f\| = \sqrt{} +\infty \sum n= - \infty | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . (10) Proof. See [7] (Theorem 3.4). The generalized Jacobi – Dunkl translation operator is defined for f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 and \theta , h \in \BbbT by \scrT hf(\theta ) := \left\{ \int \pi 2 - \pi 2 f(\varphi )W (h, \theta , \varphi )\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\varphi )d\varphi if h, \theta \in G\alpha ,\beta , f(\theta + h) if h /\in G\alpha ,\beta or \theta /\in G\alpha ,\beta , where G\alpha ,\beta := \left\{ \BbbR \setminus \{ n\pi \} n\in \BbbZ if \alpha > \beta \geq - 1 2 , \BbbR \setminus \Bigl\{ n\pi 2 \Bigr\} n\in \BbbZ if \alpha = \beta > - 1 2 , \emptyset if \alpha = \beta = - 1 2 , and W (h, \theta , \varphi ) is a certain function satisfies the following properties (see [12]): W (h, \theta , \varphi ) =W (\theta , h, \varphi ), W (h, \theta , - \varphi ) =W ( - h, - \theta , \varphi ), W (h, \theta , \varphi ) =W (h, - \varphi , - \theta ). In particular, the product formula \scrT h\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) = \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (h)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ). (11) holds. Some properties of generalized Jacobi – Dunkl translation operator are fulfilled. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 1432 O. TYR, R. DAHER Theorem 2. If f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 , then \scrT hf \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 and we have \| \scrT hf\| \leq \| f\| \forall h \in \BbbT . Proof. See [12] (Theorem 3). Proposition 1. Let f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 and n \in \BbbZ . Then \scrF (\scrT hf)(n) = \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (h)\scrF f(n) \forall h \in \BbbT . Proof. See [12] (Remark 4). For every f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 , we define the differences \Delta m h f of order m, m = 1, 2, . . . , with step h > 0, 0 < h < \pi /2, by \Delta 1 hf(\theta ) = \Delta hf(\theta ) := \scrT hf(\theta ) + \scrT - hf(\theta ) - 2f(\theta ), \Delta m h f(\theta ) = \Delta h \bigl( \Delta m - 1 h f(\theta ) \bigr) for m \geq 2. Also, we can write that \Delta m h f(\theta ) = \Bigl( \scrT h + \scrT - h - 2I\BbbL 2 \Bigr) m f(\theta ), where I\BbbL 2 is the identity operator in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 . The generalized modulus of continuity of a function f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 is defined by \omega m(f, \delta ) = \mathrm{s}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{p} 0<h\leq \delta \| \Delta m h f\| , \delta > 0. Let W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ), r = 0, 1, . . . , denote the class of functions f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 that have generalized derivatives satisfying the estimate \omega m \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f, \delta \bigr) = O(\psi (\delta m)), \delta \rightarrow 0, where \psi (.) is any nonnegative function given on [0,+\infty ), \psi (0) = 0 and \Lambda 0 \alpha ,\beta f = f, \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f = \Lambda \alpha ,\beta , \Lambda r - 1 \alpha ,\beta f, r = 1, 2, . . . , i.e., W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ) = \Bigl\{ f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 : \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 and \omega m \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f, \delta \bigr) = O(\psi (\delta m)), \delta \rightarrow 0 \Bigr\} . 3. Main results. Taking into account what was said in the previous section, for some classes of functions characterized by the generalized modulus of continuity, we can prove two estimates for the serie EN (f) = \sqrt{} \sum | n| \geq N | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n , which are useful in applications. To prove the main results, we shall need some preliminary results. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 ON THE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION . . . 1433 Lemma 2. For f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 , we get \scrF (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta f)(n) = i\lambda n\scrF f(n) for all n \in \BbbZ . Proof. Since \lambda - n = - \lambda n \forall n \in \BbbZ , it follows from this and (5) that \Lambda \alpha ,\beta \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) = \Lambda \alpha ,\beta \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) - n (\theta ) = i\lambda - n\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) - n (\theta ) = - i\lambda n\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ). Therefore, thanks to the formula (6), we conclude that \scrF (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta f)(n) = \pi 2\int - \pi 2 \Lambda \alpha ,\beta f(\theta )\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta = = - \pi 2\int - \pi 2 f(\theta )\Lambda \alpha ,\beta (\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ))\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta = = \pi 2\int - \pi 2 i\lambda nf(\theta )\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )\scrA \alpha ,\beta (\theta )d\theta = i\lambda n\scrF f(n). Lemma 2 is proved. Remark 1. From Lemma 2, we can see that, for all f \in W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ), \scrF \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \bigr) (n) = (i\lambda n) r\scrF f(n) \forall n \in \BbbZ for all r = 0, 1, 2, . . . ,m. Lemma 3. Let \theta \in \BbbT . If f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 with f(\theta ) = +\infty \sum n= - \infty \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n , then \scrT hf(\theta ) = +\infty \sum n= - \infty \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (h)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . Proof. By product formula (11) of \scrT h, we have \scrT h\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ) = \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (h)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta ). Thus, for any polynomial \scrQ N (\theta ) = N\sum n= - N \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n , ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 1434 O. TYR, R. DAHER since \scrT h is linear, we obtain \scrT h\scrQ N (\theta ) = N\sum n= - N \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (h)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . (12) By using the fact that \scrT h is a linear bounded operator in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 and the set of all polynomials \scrQ N (\theta ) is everywhere dense in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 , passage to the limit in (12) gives the desired equality. Lemma 3 is proved. Lemma 4. Let f \in W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ) and 0 < h < \pi /2. Then, for all n \in \BbbZ , we have \bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta m h \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| 2 = 22m +\infty \sum n= - \infty \lambda 2rn \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| 2m| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n , where m = 0, 1, 2, . . . and r = 0, 1, 2, . . . ,m. Proof. Take into account the result of Lemma 3, we get \Delta hf(\theta ) = \scrT hf(\theta ) + \scrT - hf(\theta ) - 2f(\theta ) = = +\infty \sum n= - \infty \Bigl( \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (h) + \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n ( - h) - 2 \Bigr) \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . Since (see (8)) \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (h) = \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) + i \lambda n 4(\alpha + 1) \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}(2h)\varphi (\alpha +1,\beta +1) | n| - 1 (h), \psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n ( - h) = \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| ( - h) - i \lambda n 4(\alpha + 1) \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}(2h)\varphi (\alpha +1,\beta +1) | n| - 1 ( - h), by formula (2), we have \Delta hf(\theta ) = 2 +\infty \sum n= - \infty \Bigl( \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) - 1 \Bigr) \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . Using the proof of recurrence for m, we obtain \Delta m h f(\theta ) = 2m +\infty \sum n= - \infty \Bigl( \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) - 1 \Bigr) m \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . Remark 1 gives \Delta m h (\Lambda r \alpha ,\beta f)(\theta ) = ir2m +\infty \sum n= - \infty \lambda rn \Bigl( \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) - 1 \Bigr) m \scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . By appealing the Plancherel formula (10), we get \bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta m h \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| 2 = 22m +\infty \sum n= - \infty \lambda 2rn \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| 2m| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . Lemma 4 is proved. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 ON THE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION . . . 1435 Theorem 3. For functions f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 in the class W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ), there exists a fixed constant c > 0 such that, for all N > 0, we have EN (f) = O(\lambda - rN \psi [(c/N)m]) as N \rightarrow \infty , where r = 0, 1, 2, . . . , m = 1, 2, . . . , and \psi (.) is any nonnegative function given on [0,+\infty ). Proof. Let f \in W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ), by the Hölder inequality for sums, we obtain E2 N (f) - \sum | n| \geq N \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h)| \scrF f(n)| 2wn = \sum | n| \geq N \Bigl( 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \Bigr) | \scrF f(n)| 2wn = = \sum | n| \geq N \biggl( | \scrF f(n)| 2 - 1 mw 1 - 1 2m n \biggr) \biggl( \Bigl( 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \Bigr) | \scrF f(n)| 1 mw 1 2m n \biggr) \leq \leq \left( \sum | n| \geq N | \scrF f(n)| 2wn \right) 2m - 1 2m \left( \sum | n| \geq N \Bigl( 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \Bigr) 2m | \scrF f(n)| 2wn \right) 1 2m = = (EN (f)) 2m - 1 m \left( \sum | n| \geq N \Bigl( 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \Bigr) 2m | \scrF f(n)| 2wn \right) 1 2m . Since \lambda 2n \geq \lambda 2N for all | n| \geq N, we conclude that E2 N (f) - \sum | n| \geq N \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h)| \scrF f(n)| 2wn \leq \leq (EN (f)) 2m - 1 m \left( \lambda - 2r N \sum | n| \geq N \lambda 2rn \Bigl( 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \Bigr) 2m | \scrF f(n)| 2wn \right) 1 2m \leq \leq (EN (f)) 2m - 1 m \left( \lambda - 2r N 22m \sum | n| \geq N \lambda 2rn (1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h))2m| \scrF f(n)| 2wn \right) 1 2m . From Lemma 4, we have 22m \sum | n| \geq N \lambda 2rn \Bigl( 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \Bigr) 2m | \scrF f(n)| 2wn \leq \bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta m h \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| 2. Thus, E2 N (f) \leq \sum | n| \geq N \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h)| \scrF f(n)| 2wn + (EN (f)) 2m - 1 m \lambda - r m N \bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta m h \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| 1 m . (13) ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 1436 O. TYR, R. DAHER From (4), we get \sum | n| \geq N \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h)| \scrF f(n)| 2wn \leq c2(Nh) - \alpha - 1/2E2 N (f). For f \in W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ), there exists a constant C > 0 such that\bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta m h \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| \leq C\psi (hm). Choose a constant c3 such that the number c4 = 1 - c2c - \alpha - 1/2 3 is positive. Setting h = c3/N in the inequality (13), we have c4E 2 N (f) \leq (EN (f)) 2m - 1 m \lambda - r m N C 1 m (\psi [(c3/N)m]) 1 m . By raising both sides to the power m and simplifying by (EN (f)) 2m - 1, we finally obtain cm4 EN (f) \leq C\lambda - rN \psi [(c3/N)m] for all N > 0. Hence, the theorem is proved with c = c3. Theorem 4. Let \phi (t) = t\nu . Then f \in W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ) is equivalent to EN (f) = O \bigl( N - r - m\nu \bigr) , where r = 0, 1, 2, . . . , m = 1, 2, . . . , and 0 < \nu < 2. Proof. Assume that f \in W r,m 2,\psi (\Lambda \alpha ,\beta ), by using the fact that \lambda N = 2 \sqrt{} N(N + \rho ) \geq 2N. Then, from this and according to the Theorem 3, we conclude that EN (f) = O \bigl( N - r - m\nu \bigr) . This shows us this implication. We prove necessity. Let EN (f) = O \bigl( N - r - m\nu \bigr) , i.e., \sum | n| \geq N | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n = O \bigl( N - 2r - 2m\nu \bigr) . (14) It is easy to show that there exists a function f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 such that \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \in \BbbL (\alpha ,\beta ) 2 and \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f(\theta ) = ir +\infty \sum n= - \infty \lambda rn\scrF f(n)\psi (\alpha ,\beta ) n (\theta )w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . From the formula above and Plancherel identity (10), we have ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 ON THE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION . . . 1437 \bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta m h \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| 2 = 22m +\infty \sum n= - \infty \lambda 2rn \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| 2m| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . This sum is divided into two \| \Delta m h (\Lambda r \alpha ,\beta f)\| 2 = \scrI 1 + \scrI 2, where \scrI 1 = \sum | n| <N 22m\lambda 2rn | 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h)| 2m| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n and \scrI 2 = \sum | n| \geq N 22m\lambda 2rn | 1 - \varphi (\alpha ,\beta ) | n| (h)| 2m| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n with N = \bigl[ h - 1 \bigr] is the integer part of h - 1. Let us now estimate each of them, we estimate \scrI 2, it follows from (1) that \scrI 2 \leq 24m \sum | n| \geq N \lambda 2rn | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . Note that \lambda 2n = 4n2 \biggl( 1 + \rho | n| \biggr) \leq 4n2(1 + \rho ) for all | n| \geq 1, n \in \BbbZ . (15) It follows from this that \scrI 2 \leq 24m(4\rho + 4)r \sum | n| \geq N n2r| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n = = c5 +\infty \sum j=0 \sum N+j\leq | n| \leq N+j+1 n2r| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n \leq \leq c5 +\infty \sum j=0 (N + j + 1)2r \sum N+j\leq | n| \leq N+j+1 | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n = = c5 +\infty \sum j=0 aj(\scrV j - \scrV j+1), where aj = (N + j + 1)2r and \scrV j = \sum | n| \geq N+j | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . Furthermore, for all integers M \geq 1, the summation by parts gives M\sum j=0 aj(\scrV j - \scrV j+1) = a0\scrV 0 - aM\scrV M+1 + M\sum j=1 \scrV j(aj - aj - 1) \leq \leq a0\scrV 0 + M\sum j=1 \scrV j(aj - aj - 1). ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 1438 O. TYR, R. DAHER Moreover, by the finite increments theorem, we have aj - aj - 1 \leq 2r(N + j + 1)2r - 1. On the other hand, by (14), there exists c6 > 0 such that, for all N > 0, E2 N (f) \leq c6N - 2r - 2m\nu . For N \geq 1, we obtain M\sum j=0 aj(\scrV j - \scrV j+1) \leq a0\scrV 0 + M\sum j=1 \scrV j(aj - aj - 1) \leq \leq c6 \biggl( 1 + 1 N \biggr) 2r N - 2m\nu + 2rc6 M\sum j=1 \biggl( 1 + 1 N + j \biggr) 2r - 1 (N + j) - 1 - 2m\nu \leq \leq c62 2rN - 2m\nu + 22rrc6 M\sum j=1 (N + j) - 1 - 2m\nu . Finally, by the integral comparison test, we get M\sum j=1 (N + j) - 1 - 2m\nu \leq +\infty \sum \mu =N+1 \mu - 1 - 2m\nu \leq +\infty \int N t - 1 - 2m\nu dt = 1 2m\nu N - 2m\nu . Letting M \rightarrow +\infty , we see that, for r \geq 0 and m, \nu > 0, there exists a constant c7 such that, for all N \geq 1, \scrI 2 \leq c7N - 2m\nu . Consequently, for all h > 0, we have \scrI 2 \leq c7h 2m\nu . (16) Now, we estimate \scrI 1. From formulae (3) and (15), we obtain \scrI 1 \leq 22mc2m1 h4m \sum | n| <N \lambda 2r+4m n | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n \leq \leq c8h 4m \sum | n| <N n2r+4m| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n \leq \leq c8h 4m N - 1\sum j=0 \sum j\leq | n| \leq j+1 n2r+4m| \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n \leq \leq c8h 4m N - 1\sum j=0 (j + 1)2r+4m \sum j\leq | n| \leq j+1 | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n = ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 ON THE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION . . . 1439 = c8h 4m N - 1\sum j=0 aj(\scrV j - \scrV j+1), where aj = (j + 1)2r+4m and \scrV j = \sum | n| \geq j | \scrF f(n)| 2w(\alpha ,\beta ) n . Using a summation by parts and proceeding as with \scrI 2 and the fact that \scrV j \leq c6j - 2r - 2m\nu by hypothesis, we get \scrI 1 \leq c8h 4m N - 1\sum j=0 aj(\scrV j - \scrV j+1) \leq c8h 4m \left( a0\scrV 0 + N - 1\sum j=1 \scrV j(aj - aj - 1) \right) \leq \leq c8h 4m \left( \scrV 0 + c6(2r + 4m) N - 1\sum j=1 (j + 1)2r+4m - 1j - 2r - 2m\nu \right) . From the inequality j + 1 \leq 2j, we conclude that \scrI 1 \leq c8h 4m \left( \scrV 0 + c9 N - 1\sum j=1 j4m - 2m\nu - 1 \right) . As a consequence of a series comparison, we have the inequality \mu N - 1\sum j=1 j\mu - 1 \leq N\mu for \mu > 0 and N \geq 2. If \mu = 4m - 2m\nu > 0 for \nu < 2, then we obtain \scrI 1 \leq c8h 4m \bigl( \scrV 0 + c10N 4m - 2m\nu \bigr) \leq c8h 4m \bigl( \scrV 0 + c10h 2m\nu - 4m \bigr) , since N \leq 1/h. If h is sufficiently small, then \scrV 0 \leq c10h 2m\nu - 4m. Then we have \scrI 1 \leq c11h 2m\nu . (17) Combining the estimates (16) and (17) for \scrI 1 and \scrI 2 gives\bigm\| \bigm\| \Delta m h \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f \bigr) \bigm\| \bigm\| = O(hm\nu ). Consequently, \omega m \bigl( \Lambda r\alpha ,\beta f, \delta \bigr) = O(\delta m\nu ) = O(\psi (\delta m)). Therefore, the necessity is proved and the proof of the theorem is completed. References 1. V. A. Abilov, F. V. Abilova, M. K. Kerimov, Some issues concerning approximations of functions by Fourier – Bessel sums, Comput. Math. and Math. Phys., 53, № 7, 867 – 873 (2013). 2. V. A. Abilov, F. V. Abilova, M. K. Kerimov, Some remarks concerning the Fourier transform in the space L2 \bigl( \BbbR n \bigr) , Zh. Vychisl. Mat. i Mat. Fiz., 48, 939 – 945 (2008) (English transl.: Comput. Math. and Math. Phys., 48, 885 – 891 (2008)). ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10 1440 O. TYR, R. DAHER 3. R. Askey, S. Wainger, A convolution structure for Jacobi series, Amer. J. Math., 91, 463 – 485 (1969). 4. H. Bavinck, Approximation processes for Fourier – Jacobi expansions, Appl. Anal., 5, 293 – 312 (1976). 5. F. Chouchene, Bounds, asymptotic behavior and recurrence relations for the Jacobi – Dunkl polynomials, Int. J. Open Probl. Complex Anal., 6, № 1, 49 – 77 (2014). 6. F. Chouchene, I. Haouala, Dirichlet theorem for Jacobi – Dunkl expansions; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal- 02126595. 7. F. Chouchene, Harmonic analysis associated with the Jacobi – Dunkl operator on \Bigr] - \pi 2 , \pi 2 \Bigl[ , J. Comput. and Appl. Math., 178, 75 – 89 (2005). 8. G. Gasper, Positivity and the convolution structure for Jacobi series, Ann. Math., 93, 112 – 118 (1971). 9. S. S. Platonov, Some problems in the theory of approximation of functions on compact homogeneous manifolds, Mat. Sb., 200, № 6, 67 – 108 (2009) (English transl.: Sb. Math., 200, № 6, 845 – 885 (2009)). 10. A. Sveshnikov, A. N. Bogolyubov, V. V. Kravtsov, Lectures on mathematical physics, Nauka, Moscow (2004) (in Russian). 11. A. N. Tikhonov, A. A. Samarskii, Equations of mathematical physics, Gostekhteorizdat, Moscow (1953) (Pergamon Press, Oxford (1964)). 12. O. L. Vinogradov, On the norms of generalized translation operators generated by Jacobi – Dunkl operators, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. POMI, 389, 34 – 57 (2011). Received 20.08.20 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2022, т. 74, № 10
id umjimathkievua-article-6275
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T03:26:50Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/a6/08f8cea0873e846a902abead600561a6.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-62752022-12-17T13:38:56Z On On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$ On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$ Tyr, O. Daher, R. Tyr, O. Daher, R. JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION UDC 517.5 We prove some new estimates useful in applications&amp;nbsp; for the approximation of certain classes of functions characterized by the generalized continuity modulus from the space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$ by partial sums of the Jacobi – Dunkl series.&amp;nbsp;For this purpose, we use the generalized Jacobi – Dunkl translation operator obtained&amp;nbsp; by Vinogradov in the monograph [Theory of approximation of functions of real variable, Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1960) (in Russian)]. УДК 517.5 Про наближення функцій за допомогою розкладів Якобі – Данкла у ваговому просторі $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$ Доведено деякі нові оцінки, корисні в застосуваннях, для наближень певних класів функцій, що характеризуються узагальненим модулем неперервності з простору $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)},$ частковими сумами рядів Якобі – Данкла.&amp;nbsp;З цією метою використано узагальнений оператор трансляції Якобі – Данкла, що був отриманий Виноградовим у монографії [Theory of approximation of functions of real variable. Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1960) (in Russian)].&amp;nbsp; Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2022-11-27 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/6275 10.37863/umzh.v74i10.6275 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 74 No. 10 (2022); 1427 - 1440 Український математичний журнал; Том 74 № 10 (2022); 1427 - 1440 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/6275/9318 Copyright (c) 2022 Othman Tyr
spellingShingle Tyr, O.
Daher, R.
Tyr, O.
Daher, R.
On On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$
title On On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$
title_alt On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$
title_full On On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$
title_fullStr On On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$
title_full_unstemmed On On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$
title_short On On the approximation of functions by Jacobi – Dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{L}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$
title_sort on on the approximation of functions by jacobi – dunkl expansion in the weighted space $\mathbb{l}_{2}^{(\alpha,\beta)}$
topic_facet JACOBI – DUNKL EXPANSION
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/6275
work_keys_str_mv AT tyro onontheapproximationoffunctionsbyjacobidunklexpansionintheweightedspacemathbbl2alphabeta
AT daherr onontheapproximationoffunctionsbyjacobidunklexpansionintheweightedspacemathbbl2alphabeta
AT tyro onontheapproximationoffunctionsbyjacobidunklexpansionintheweightedspacemathbbl2alphabeta
AT daherr onontheapproximationoffunctionsbyjacobidunklexpansionintheweightedspacemathbbl2alphabeta
AT tyro ontheapproximationoffunctionsbyjacobidunklexpansionintheweightedspacemathbbl2alphabeta
AT daherr ontheapproximationoffunctionsbyjacobidunklexpansionintheweightedspacemathbbl2alphabeta
AT tyro ontheapproximationoffunctionsbyjacobidunklexpansionintheweightedspacemathbbl2alphabeta
AT daherr ontheapproximationoffunctionsbyjacobidunklexpansionintheweightedspacemathbbl2alphabeta