Subsequent investigations of the least cardinalities of unique range set for two minimum weights over a non-Archimedean field
UDC 517.53 First of all, we indicate a severe error in the analysis of the main results of both  Chakraborty [Ukr. Math. J., 72, No. 11, 1794–1806 (2021)] and Chakraborty–Chakraborty [Ukr. Math. J., 72, No. 7, 1164–1174 (2020)], to show that both these  papers cease to be t...
Збережено в:
| Дата: | 2023 |
|---|---|
| Автори: | , |
| Формат: | Стаття |
| Мова: | Англійська |
| Опубліковано: |
Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
2023
|
| Онлайн доступ: | https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/6717 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Назва журналу: | Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Репозитарії
Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal| Резюме: | UDC 517.53
First of all, we indicate a severe error in the analysis of the main results of both  Chakraborty [Ukr. Math. J., 72, No. 11, 1794–1806 (2021)] and Chakraborty–Chakraborty [Ukr. Math. J., 72, No. 7, 1164–1174 (2020)], to show that both these  papers cease to be true.  Further, pertinent to the results of these two papers, we  deal with the unique range set of a meromorphic function over a non-Archimedean field with the smallest possible weights 0 and 1 under the aegis of its most  generalized form to improve the existing result. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.37863/umzh.v74i12.6717 |