Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space

UDC 515.1 We firstly describe conditions for being elastica or nonelastica for a lightlike elastic Cartan curve in the Minkowski space $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$ by using the Bishop orthonormal vector frame and associated Bishop components.  Then we compute the energy of the ligh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2020
Main Authors: Körpinar, T., Demirkol, R. C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2020
Online Access:https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/847
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
Download file: Pdf

Institution

Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
_version_ 1860507221709815808
author Körpinar, T.
Demirkol, R. C.
Körpinar, T.
Demirkol, R. C.
author_facet Körpinar, T.
Demirkol, R. C.
Körpinar, T.
Demirkol, R. C.
author_sort Körpinar, T.
baseUrl_str https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2022-03-26T11:01:59Z
description UDC 515.1 We firstly describe conditions for being elastica or nonelastica for a lightlike elastic Cartan curve in the Minkowski space $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$ by using the Bishop orthonormal vector frame and associated Bishop components.  Then we compute the energy of the lightlike elastic and nonelastic Cartan curve in the Minkowski space $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$ and investigate its relationship with the energy of the same curve in Bishop vector fields in $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$.  Here, energy functionals are computed in terms of Bishop curvatures of the lightlike Cartan curve lying in the Minkowski space $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$.
doi_str_mv 10.37863/umzh.v72i8.847
first_indexed 2026-03-24T02:05:52Z
format Article
fulltext DOI: 10.37863/umzh.v72i8.847 UDC 515.1 T. Körpinar, R. C. Demirkol (Muş Alparslan Univ., Turkey) CURVATURE AND TORSION DEPENDENT ENERGY OF ELASTICA AND NONELASTICA FOR A LIGHTLIKE CURVE IN THE MINKOWSKI SPACE ЗАЛЕЖНА ВIД КРИВИНИ ТА КРУЧЕННЯ ЕНЕРГIЯ ПРУЖНОСТI ТА НЕПРУЖНОСТI ДЛЯ СВIТЛОПОДIБНИХ КРИВИХ У ПРОСТОРI МIНКОВСЬКОГО We firstly describe conditions for being elastica or nonelastica for a lightlike elastic Cartan curve in the Minkowski space \BbbE 4 1 by using the Bishop orthonormal vector frame and associated Bishop components. Then we compute the energy of the lightlike elastic and nonelastic Cartan curve in the Minkowski space \BbbE 4 1 and investigate its relationship with the energy of the same curve in Bishop vector fields in \BbbE 4 1 . Here, energy functionals are computed in terms of Bishop curvatures of the lightlike Cartan curve lying in the Minkowski space \BbbE 4 1 . Спочатку описано умови пружностi та непружностi свiтлоподiбних пружних кривих Картана у просторi Мiнков- ського \BbbE 4 1 за допомогою ортонормального векторного репера та вiдповiдних компонент Бiшопа. Потiм обчислено енергiю пружних та непружних свiтлоподiбних кривих Картана у просторi Мiнковського \BbbE 4 1 та вивчено iхнiй зв’язок iз енергiєю тiєї ж кривої у векторних полях Бiшопа у \BbbE 4 1 . Тут функцiонали енергiї обчислюються у термiнах кривини Бiшопа для свiтлоподiбних кривих Картана, що належать простору Мiнковського \BbbE 4 1 . 1. Introduction. Minkowski space-time is an important structure to define many well-known phy- sical and geometrical concepts such as black holes, gravitational dilation of time, cosmology, length string theory, contraction, etc. In this Minkowski space, mass-energy equivalence states the rela- tionship between mass and energy and special relativity estimates this equivalence by the formula E = mc2, where c is the light’s speed in a vacuum [1, 2]. Some traditional geometric topics such as local and global features of different types of curves are used to many physical subjects. For instance, Altin [3] calculated the energy of Frenet orthonormal vector fields by using nonlightlike curves. Körpınar [4] considered a timelike biharmonic particle and computed its energy functional in Heisenberg spacetime. Lightlike curves are a thoroughly complicated field to study since their tangent vectors cannot be normalized in an ordinary manner in contrast to nonlightlike curves. Körpinar characterized the energy of different types of lightlike curves in Minkowski space \BbbE 4 1 [5]. The fundamental ingredient for the study of the geodesic lightlike congruences, gravitational ra- diation, Killing horizon are determined via tetrad formalism of Newman – Penrose, which is deduced by a lightlike curve. Furthermore, it is known that relativistic string can be defined as a surface in Minkowski space such that it is a Lorentzian analogue of the equations of minimal surface. Wave equations can also be simplified by string equations and solving 2-dimensional wave equations leads that strings and pair of lightlike curves are equivalents [6 – 10]. Materials having the feature of deformable property such as flexible metals, paper, cloth, rubber are the main instances and study fields of the elasticity theory. However, elastic theory enlightens a broad range of other physical and mathematical studies such as the study of variational problems, the solution of the elliptic integral, mechanical equilibrium, equilibrium of moments, which constitutes c\bigcirc T. KÖRPINAR, R. C. DEMIRKOL, 2020 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 1095 1096 T. KÖRPINAR, R. C. DEMIRKOL the elementary principle of statics. Further, it is seen that elastica gives a natural solution for the variational problem, which deals with the minimizing of bending energy of the elastic curve. Later, the equivalence between the motion of the simple pendulum and fundamental differential equation of elastica was investigated. Recently, numerical computation implemented on the elastica is used to develop mathematical spline theory [11]. In this study, we firstly determine differential equations satisfied by non-rigid deformable light- like Cartan curves in order to model the behavior of lightlike elastic Cartan curves in 4-dimensional Minkowski space \BbbE 4 1 . We compute energy on the lightlike elastic Cartan curves by using the vari- ational method. Finally, we define lightlike nonelastic Cartan curves and compute their energy to characterize their structure and investigate the relationship between the elastic and nonelastic cases. 2. Lightlike curves in Minkowski space \BbbE 4 1 . Minkowski space \BbbE 4 1 is the 4-dimensional standard real vector space equipped with the usual indefinite metric (\cdot , \cdot ) described by (x, y) = x1y1 + x2y2 + x3y3 - x4y4, where x, y \in \BbbE 4 1. Owing to the intrinsic features of the indefinite metric (\cdot , \cdot ), any vector x \in \BbbE 4 1 possesses three causal characters, which is determined by the norm of the given vector \| x\| = = \sqrt{} | (x, x)| . To be more specific, any vector x \in \BbbE 4 1 can be characterized as follows: x is spacelike, if (x,x) is positive, x is timelike, if (x,x) is negative, x is lightlike, if (x,x) is zero. One can give a similar characterization for any space curve defined in \BbbE 4 1. Namely, an arbitrary space curve \alpha : I \rightarrow \BbbE 4 1 is called a spacelike, timelike or lightlike curve provided that all tangent vectors of \alpha are spacelike, timelike or lightlike along with the curve. In this study, we mainly focus on a special class of lightlike curves which is known as a Cartan lightlike curve. A curve \alpha is called a lightlike Cartan curve supposed that its parametrization is determined by the pseudo-arc function defined by s(t) = t\int 0 \sqrt{} \| \alpha \prime \prime (u)\| du. As we recall, some of the geometric and physical features of a space curve are defined with the help of the geometric quantities known as the torsion and curvature. To handle with the intrinsic characterization for a lightlike Cartan curve in \BbbE 4 1, these quantities are also defined for lightlike Cartan curves with the name of the first, second, and third Cartan curvatures and denoted respectively by k1, k2, k3. A unique orthonormal vectors \{ \bfT ,\bfN ,\bfB 1,\bfB 2\} satisfy the following set of equation systems along the nongeodesic lightlike Cartan curve \alpha and it is called by the Frenet – Serret frame of lightlike Cartan curve [12]: \nabla T\bfT = k1\bfN , \nabla T\bfN = - k2\bfT + k1\bfB 1, (1) \nabla T\bfB 1 = - k2\bfN +k3\bfB 2, ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 CURVATURE AND TORSION DEPENDENT ENERGY OF ELASTICA AND NONELASTICA . . . 1097 \nabla T\bfB 2 = k3\bfT , where k1 = 1, k2, and k3 are arbitrary functions. Here, we also have 0 = (\bfT ,\bfT ) = (\bfB 1,\bfB 1) = (\bfN ,\bfB 1) = (\bfB 1,\bfB 2) = (\bfT ,\bfN ) = (\bfT ,\bfB 2), 1 = (\bfN ,\bfN ) = (\bfB 2,\bfB 2), (\bfT ,\bfB 1) = - 1. Bishop frame is known as the relatively parallel frame and it is obtained by conducting some modifi- cation on the Frenet – Serret frame. Using the Bishop frame provides some advantages and effective- ness compared to the classical Frenet – Serret frame. For this reason, we will state Bishop’s frame of the lightlike Cartan curve and consider it as the main frame for the rest of the paper. Case 1: Let \alpha be a lightlike Cartan curve in \BbbE 4 1 and k1 = 1, k3 = 0, and k2 be an arbitrary function, then Bishop frame equations for orthonormal vectors \{ \bfT ,\bfN 1,\bfN 2,\bfN 3\} are stated as the following [12]: \nabla T\bfT = \pi 2\bfT + \pi 1\bfN 1, \nabla T\bfN 1 = \pi 1\bfN 2, (2) \nabla T\bfN 2 = - \pi 2\bfN 2, \nabla T\bfN 3 = 0, where the first, second and third Bishop curvature satisfies respectively that \pi 1 = 1, \pi \prime 2 = - 1 2 \pi 2 2 - k2, \pi 3 = 0. Here, we also have 0 = (\bfT ,\bfT ) = (\bfN 2,\bfN 2) = (\bfT ,\bfN 1) = (\bfN 1,\bfN 2) = (\bfT ,\bfN 3) = (\bfN 2,\bfN 3), (\bfN 1,\bfN 1) = (\bfN 3,\bfN 3) = 1, (\bfT ,\bfN 2) = - 1. Case 2: Let \alpha be a lightlike Cartan curve in \BbbE 4 1 and k1 = 1, k2, k3 be arbitrary functions, then Bishop frame equations for orthonormal vectors \{ \bfT ,\bfN 1,\bfN 2,\bfN 3\} are stated as the following [12]: \nabla T\bfT = \pi 2\bfT + \pi 1\bfN 1 - \pi 3\bfN 3, \nabla T\bfN 1 = \pi 1\bfN 2, (3) \nabla T\bfN 2 = - \pi 2\bfN 2, \nabla T\bfN 3 = - \pi 3\bfN 2, where the first, second and third Bishop curvature satisfies respectively that \pi 1 = \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n} \theta , \pi 2 = = - k3 - \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime , \pi 3 = \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s} \theta (\theta \prime \not = 0) and 2\theta \prime (\theta \prime \prime \prime - k\prime 3) + 2\theta \prime \prime (k3 - \theta \prime \prime ) + \theta \prime 4 - (k3 - \theta \prime \prime )2 - 2k2\theta \prime 2 = 0. Here, we also have 0 = (\bfT ,\bfT ) = (\bfN 2,\bfN 2) = (\bfT ,\bfN 1) = (\bfN 1,\bfN 2) = (\bfT ,\bfN 3) = (\bfN 2,\bfN 3), (\bfN 1,\bfN 1) = (\bfN 3,\bfN 3) = 1, (\bfT ,\bfN 2) = - 1. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 1098 T. KÖRPINAR, R. C. DEMIRKOL 3. Energy on the classical Bernoulli – Euler elastica. 3.1. Energy on the Frenet vector field. We first give fundamental definitions and propositions, which are used to compute the energy of the vector field. Definition 3.1. Let (M,\rho ) and (N,h) betwo Riemannian manifolds, then the energy of a dif- ferentiable map f : (M,\rho ) \rightarrow (N,h) can be defined as \varepsilon nergy(f) = 1 2 \int M n\sum a=1 h \bigl( df(ea), df(ea) \bigr) v, (4) where \{ ea\} is a local basis of the tangent space and v is the canonical volume form in M [3, 13]. Proposition 3.1. Let Q : T \bigl( T 1M \bigr) \rightarrow T 1M be the connection map. Then the following two conditions hold: i) \omega \circ Q = \omega \circ d\omega and \omega \circ Q = \omega \circ \~\omega , where \~\omega : T (T 1M) \rightarrow T 1M is the tangent bundle projection; ii) for \varrho \in TxM and a section \xi : M \rightarrow T 1M, we have Q \bigl( d\xi (\varrho ) \bigr) = \nabla \varrho \xi , (5) where \nabla is the Levi – Civita covariant derivative [3]. Definition 3.2. Let \varsigma 1, \varsigma 2 \in T\xi (T 1M), then we define \rho S(\varsigma 1, \varsigma 2) = \bigl( d\omega (\varsigma 1), d\omega (\varsigma 2) \bigr) + \bigl( Q(\varsigma 1), Q(\varsigma 2) \bigr) . (6) This yields a Riemannian metric on TM . As known \rho S is called the Sasaki metric that also makes the projection \omega : T 1M \rightarrow M a Riemannian submersion. 3.2. Energy on the lightlike elastic Cartan curves in \BbbE 4 1. The research on the curvature- based energies for space curves began with Bernoulli and Euler. They focus on elastic thin beams and rods. This type of energy is both essential in the mechanical context and it is also signifi- cant in computer vision, image processing and computer vision besides mathematical and physical importance [14 – 17]. Let \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 be a regular curve defined on any fixed interval [y1, y2] so that \alpha : [y1, y2] \rightarrow \BbbE 4 1 is parameterized by the pseudo arc-length \rho \bigl( \alpha \prime \prime (s), \alpha \prime \prime (s) \bigr) = 1. Elastica of bending energy is defined for the curve \alpha in \BbbE 4 1 over each point on a fixed interval [y1, y2] as \scrG = 1 2 y2\int y1 \| \alpha \prime \prime \| 2dt with some boundary conditions [18, 19]. For any two points p1, p2 \in \BbbR 4 and any two non-zero vectors p\prime 1, p \prime 2 space of smooth curves is defined as \varphi = \bigl\{ \alpha : \alpha (yi) = pi, \alpha \prime (yi) = p\prime i \bigr\} . It is also defined as the smooth curves of unit speed as a subspace of \varphi in the form ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 CURVATURE AND TORSION DEPENDENT ENERGY OF ELASTICA AND NONELASTICA . . . 1099 \varphi a = \bigl\{ \alpha \in \varphi : \bigm\| \bigm\| \alpha \prime \bigm\| \bigm\| = 1 \bigr\} . Then \scrG \pi : \varphi \rightarrow \BbbR can be defined by \scrG \pi (\alpha ) = 1 2 \int \alpha \| \alpha \prime \prime \| 2 + \Gamma (t) \bigl( \| \alpha \prime \| 2 - 1 \bigr) dt, (7) where \Gamma (t) is a pointwise multiplier. A stationary point of \scrG \pi is the minimum of \scrG on \varphi a for some \Gamma (t) according to the multiplier principle of Lagrange. Let \alpha be an extremum of \scrG \pi and V be a vector field along \alpha , which is a curve’s infinitesimal variation, then we get [20] \partial \scrG \pi (V ) = \partial \partial \Upsilon \scrG \pi (\alpha +\Upsilon V ) \bigm| \bigm| \Upsilon =0 = 0. (8) We obtain significant differences in conditions that have to be satisfied by lightlike elastic Cartan curves by using the Bishop equations formulae given by Eqs. (2), (3). Further, we also compute the energy of lightlike elastic Cartan curves by using the Lorentzian and Sasaki metrics. Case 1: Let \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 be a lightlike elastic Cartan curve defined on any fixed interval [y1, y2] so that \alpha : [y1, y2] \rightarrow \BbbE 4 1 and k1 = 1, k3 = 0, and k2 be an arbitrary function. By considering the orthonormal frame given by (2), the energy of Bishop vectors (\bfT ,\bfN 1,\bfN 2,\bfN 3) for lightlike Cartan curve \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 can be computed if one follows similar steps as in following re- search completed by K. Demirkol [4]. This study is helpful to see a relation between the energy of Bishop vectors and bending energy functional which is defined as \scrG = 1 2 \int \alpha \| \nabla T\bfT \| 2 ds. Let V be a vector field along \alpha such that it is a curve’s infinitesimal variation. By using equations (7) and (8), we get 0 = 1 2 \partial \partial \Upsilon y2\int y1 \bigm\| \bigm\| (\alpha +\Upsilon V )\prime \prime \bigm\| \bigm\| 2 + \Gamma \Bigl( \bigm\| \bigm\| (\alpha +\Upsilon V )\prime \bigm\| \bigm\| 2 - 1 \Bigr) dt = y2\int y1 (\alpha \prime \prime , V \prime \prime )dt. Applying integration by parts, we obtain 0 = (\alpha \prime \prime , V \prime ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| y2 y1 - (V, \alpha \prime \prime \prime ) \bigm| \bigm| \bigm| y2 y1 + y2\int y1 (V, \scrE (\alpha ))dt, where \scrE (\alpha ) = \alpha \prime \prime \prime \prime . Being elastica implies that \scrE (\alpha ) = \alpha \prime \prime \prime \prime \equiv 0. (9) Thanks to Noether’s theorem we know that ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 1100 T. KÖRPINAR, R. C. DEMIRKOL \scrJ = \alpha \prime \prime \prime is a constant vector field. For a parameterized curve \alpha with the arc-length s, we have from Eq. (2) \alpha \prime = \bfT , \alpha \prime \prime = \bfT \prime = \pi 2\bfT + \pi 1\bfN 1, \alpha \prime \prime \prime = \bigl( \pi 2 2 + \pi \prime 2 \bigr) \bfT + (\pi 1\pi 2 + \pi \prime 1)\bfN 1 + \pi 2 1\bfN 2. Thus, we get \scrJ = (\pi 2 2 + \pi \prime 2)\bfT + (\pi 1\pi 2 + \pi \prime 1)\bfN 1 + \pi 2 1\bfN 2. By the fact that \scrJ is a constant vector field, we find \scrJ s = 0. From this, we have the system 3\pi 2\pi \prime 2 + \pi \prime \prime 2 + \pi 3 2 = 0, 2\pi 1\pi \prime 2 + \pi 1\pi 2 2 + \pi \prime 1\pi 2 + \pi \prime \prime 1 = 0, \pi 1\pi \prime 1 = 0. Thus, we have following sample solution family of the nonlinear ordinary differential equation system for certain values of \pi 1, \pi 2, and \pi 3. Theorem 3.1. Energy of lightlike elastic Cartan curves having the Bishop characterization in the Eq. (2) in constant vector field \scrJ in \BbbE 4 1 is stated by using the Sasaki metric as follows: \varepsilon nergy1(\scrJ ) = 0. Proof. From (4) and (5) we know \varepsilon nergy1 (\scrJ ) = 1 2 s\int 0 \rho S (d\scrJ (\bfT ), d\scrJ (\bfT )) ds. If one considers the Eq. (6) then it is obtained that \rho S (d\scrJ (\bfT ), d\scrJ (\bfT )) = \rho (d\omega (\scrJ (\bfT )), d\omega (\scrJ (\bfT )))+\rho (Q(\scrJ (\bfT )), Q(\scrJ (\bfT ))). Since \scrJ is a section, we get d(\omega ) \circ d(\scrJ ) = d(\omega \circ \scrJ ) =d(idC) = idTC . We also know Q(\scrJ (\bfT )) = \bigtriangledown T\scrJ = 0. Thus, we find from the former statements that \rho S \bigl( d\scrJ (\bfT ), d\scrJ (\bfT ) \bigr) = (\bfT ,\bfT ) + (\nabla T\scrJ ,\nabla T\scrJ ) = 0. So, we can easily obtain that \varepsilon nergy1(\scrJ ) = 0. Theorem 3.1 is proved. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 CURVATURE AND TORSION DEPENDENT ENERGY OF ELASTICA AND NONELASTICA . . . 1101 Theorem 3.2. Energy of lightlike Cartan curves of Bishop orthonormal vectors of Eq. (2) are defined by using the Sasaki metric and Bishop curvatures given by the Eq. (2) in the following manner: \varepsilon nergy1(\bfT ) = 1 2 s\int 0 \pi 2 1ds, \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 1) = 0, \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 2) = 0, \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 3) = 0. Proof. It is obvious if one considers Eqs. (4) – (6). Corollary 3.1. \BbbE 4 1 be a lightlike elastic Cartan curve having the Bishop characterization given by the Eq. (2), then we have the following relation: \varepsilon nergy1(\bfT ) - \varepsilon nergy1(\scrJ ) = s 2 , \varepsilon nergy1 (\scrJ ) = \varepsilon nergy1 (\bfN 1) = \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 2) = \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 3). Proof. If one uses Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 it gives the result immediately. Case 2: Let \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 be a lightlike elastic Cartan curve defined on any fixed interval [y1, y2] so that \alpha : [y1, y2] \rightarrow \BbbE 4 1 and k1 = 1, k2, k3 be arbitrary functions. Theorem 3.3. Let \alpha be a lightlike elastic Cartan curve with the Bishop characterization given by the Eq. (3). If V is a vector field, which is an infinitesimal variation of the curve \alpha , then we have constant vector field J and some restrictions as the following: \scrJ =(\pi \prime 2 + \pi 2 2)\bfT + (\pi \prime 1 + \pi 1\pi 2)\bfN 1+( - \pi \prime 3 - \pi 2\pi 3)\bfN 3, 0 = \pi \prime 2 + \pi 2 2, 0 = \pi \prime 1 + \pi 1\pi 2, 0 = - \pi \prime 3 - \pi 2\pi 3. Proof. If we follow a similar procedure as in Case 1 and use the characterization given in the Eq. (3), it is obvious. Thus, we have following sample solution family of the nonlinear ordinary differential equation system for certain values of \pi 1, \pi 2, and \pi 3. Theorem 3.4. Energy of lightlike Cartan curves of Bishop orthonormal vectors of Eq. (3) are defined by using the Sasaki metric and Bishop curvatures given by the Eq. (3) in the following manner: \varepsilon nergy1(\bfT ) = 0, \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 1) = 0, \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 2) = 0, \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 3) = 0. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 1102 T. KÖRPINAR, R. C. DEMIRKOL Proof. It is obvious if one considers Eqs. (4) – (6). Corollary 3.2. Let \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 be a lightlike elastic Cartan curve having the Bishop characterization given by the Eq. (3), then we have the following relation: \varepsilon nergy1(\bfT ) = \varepsilon nergy1(\scrJ ) = \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 1) = = \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 2) = \varepsilon nergy1(\bfN 3). Proof is obvious. 4. Energy on nonelastic lightlike Cartan curve in \BbbE 4 1 . In this section, we deal with the concept of different types of nonelastic lightlike Cartan curves and their energies in \BbbE 4 1. Case 1: Let \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 be a lightlike Cartan curve defined on any fixed interval [y1, y2] so that it has the Bishop characterization same as in the equation (2). For a vector field V, which is an infinitesimal variation of the curve \alpha , by using Eqs. (7), (8) we get 0 = \bigl\langle \alpha \prime \prime , V \prime \bigr\rangle \bigm| \bigm| y2 y1 - \bigl\langle V, \alpha \prime \prime \prime \bigr\rangle \bigm| \bigm| y2 y1 + y2\int y1 \langle V, \scrE (\alpha )\rangle dt, where \scrE (\alpha ) = \alpha \prime \prime \prime \prime . As opposed to (9), if we assume that the curve is nonelastic, then we have \scrE (\alpha ) = (3\pi 2\pi \prime 2 + \pi \prime \prime 2 + \pi 3 2)\bfT + (2\pi 1\pi \prime 2 + \pi 1\pi 2 2 + \pi \prime 1\pi 2 + \pi \prime \prime 1)\bfN 1+3\pi 1\pi \prime 1\bfN 2. Theorem 4.1. Energy of lightlike nonelastic Cartan curve having the Bishop characterization same as in equation (2) can be computed by using the Sasaki metric as follows: \varepsilon nergy1 \bigl( \scrE (\alpha ) \bigr) = 1 2 s\int 0 ((3\pi \prime 1\pi \prime 2 + 3\pi 1\pi \prime \prime 2 + 3\pi 1\pi 2\pi \prime 2 + \pi \prime 1\pi 2 2+ +2\pi 1\pi \prime 2 + \pi \prime \prime 1\pi 2 + \pi \prime \prime \prime 1 + \pi 1\pi 3 2) 2 - (3\pi \prime 2 2 + 4\pi 2\pi \prime \prime 2+ +6\pi \prime 2\pi 2 2 + \pi \prime \prime \prime 2 + \pi 4 2)(3\pi \prime 2 1 + 4\pi 1\pi \prime \prime 1 + 2\pi 2 1\pi \prime 2 + \pi 2 1\pi 2 2 - 2\pi 1\pi \prime 1\pi 2))ds. Proof. It is obvious if we apply the Sasaki metric given by Eqs. (4) – (6) to the vector field of \scrE (\alpha ). Corollary 4.1. As stated in the Eq. (2), we have the following case for the energy of lightlike nonelastic Cartan curve \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 depending on Bishop and Frenet curvatures: \varepsilon nergy1 \bigl( \scrE (\alpha ) \bigr) = 1 2 s\int 0 \biggl( \biggl( - 3 \biggl( 1 2 \pi 2 2 + k2 \biggr) \prime - 3\pi 2 \biggl( 1 2 \pi 2 2 + k2 \biggr) - - 2 \biggl( 1 2 \pi 2 2 + k2 \biggr) + \pi 3 2 \biggr) 2 - \biggl( - 4\pi 2 \biggl( 1 2 \pi 2 2 + k2 \biggr) \prime - 6 \biggl( 1 2 \pi 2 2 + k2 \biggr) \pi 2 2 - - \biggl( 1 2 \pi 2 2 + k2 \biggr) \prime \prime + \pi 4 2 \biggr) \biggl( - 2 \biggl( 1 2 \pi 2 2 + k2 \biggr) + \pi 2 2 \biggr) \biggr) ds. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 CURVATURE AND TORSION DEPENDENT ENERGY OF ELASTICA AND NONELASTICA . . . 1103 Case 2: Let \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 be a lightlike Cartan curve defined on any fixed interval [y1, y2] so that it has the Bishop characterization same as in equation (3). For a vector field V, which is an infinitesimal variation of the curve \alpha , by using Eqs. (7), (8), we get 0 = \bigl\langle \alpha \prime \prime , V \prime \bigr\rangle + \bigl\langle V,\Gamma \alpha \prime - \alpha \prime \prime \bigr\rangle + y2\int y1 \langle V, \scrE (\alpha )\rangle dt, where \scrE (\alpha ) = \alpha \prime \prime \prime \prime . As opposed to (9), if we assume that the curve is not elastica then we have \scrE (\alpha ) = (\pi \prime 2 + \pi 2 2)\bfT + (\pi \prime 1 + \pi 1\pi 2)\bfN 1+(\pi 2 1+\pi 2 2)\bfN 2 - (\pi \prime 3 + \pi 2\pi 3)\bfN 3. Theorem 4.2. Energy of lightlike nonelastic Cartan curve having the Bishop characterization same as in equation (3) can be computed by using the Sasaki metric as follows: \varepsilon nergy2 \bigl( \scrE (\alpha ) \bigr) = 1 2 s\int 0 \Bigl( (\pi \prime \prime 1 + \pi \prime 1\pi 2 + \pi 1\pi \prime 2 + \pi 1\pi 2 2) 2+ +(\pi \prime \prime 3 + 2\pi \prime 2\pi 3 + \pi 2\pi \prime 3 + \pi 2 2\pi 3) 2 - - (\pi \prime \prime 2 + 3\pi 2\pi \prime 2 + \pi 3 2)(3\pi 1\pi \prime 1 + 2\pi 2\pi \prime 2 - \pi 3 2 + \pi 3\pi \prime 3 - \pi 2\pi 2 3) \Bigr) ds. Proof. It is obvious, if we apply the Sasaki metric given by Eqs. (4) – (6) to the vector field of \scrE (\alpha ). Corollary 4.2. As stated in the Eq. (3), we have the following case for the energy of lightlike nonelastic Cartan curve \alpha \in \BbbE 4 1 depending on Bishop and Frenet curvatures: \varepsilon nergy2 \bigl( \scrE (\alpha ) \bigr) = 1 2 s\int 0 \Biggl( \Biggl( - \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n} \theta + \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s} \theta \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) - \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n} \theta \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) \prime + +\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n} \theta \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) 2 \Biggr) 2 + \Biggl( - \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s} \theta - 2 \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) \prime \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s} \theta + +\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n} \theta \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) + \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s} \theta \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) 2 \Biggr) 2 - - \Biggl( \biggl( - k3 - \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) \prime \prime + 3 \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) \prime - - \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) 3 \Biggr) \Biggl( 3 \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n} \theta \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s} \theta + 2 \Biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \Biggr) \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) \prime - - \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) 3 - \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n} \theta \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s} \theta + \biggl( k3 + \theta \prime \prime \theta \prime \biggr) \mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}2 \theta \Biggr) \Biggr) ds, where 2\theta \prime (\theta \prime \prime \prime - k\prime 3) + 2\theta \prime \prime (k3 - \theta \prime \prime ) + \theta \prime 4 - (k3 - \theta \prime \prime )2 - 2k2\theta \prime 2 = 0 and \theta \prime \not = 0. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 1104 T. KÖRPINAR, R. C. DEMIRKOL 5. Application of the argument. In this section, we examine some special cases of lightlike Cartan curves in the case of being elastic or nonelastic. Example 5.1. Let \alpha be a lightlike Cartan curve in \BbbE 4 1 and k1 = 1, k2 = k3 = 0. Then modified Bishop frame equations for orthonormal vectors \{ \bfT ,\bfN 1,\bfN 2,\bfN 3\} having the form in the Eq. (2) can be stated as the following [12]: \nabla T\bfT = \pi 2\bfT + \pi 1\bfN 1, \nabla T\bfN 1 = \pi 1\bfN 2, \nabla T\bfN 2 = - \pi 2\bfN 2, \nabla T\bfN 3 = 0, where \pi 1 = 1, \pi 2 = 2 s , \pi 3 = 0. If \alpha is a lightlike elastic Cartan curve, then \varepsilon nergy1(\scrJ ) = 0. If \alpha is a lightlike nonelastic Cartan curve, then \varepsilon nergy1 \bigl( \scrE (\alpha ) \bigr) = 1 2 \int \biggl( 12 s3 - 12 s3 - 4 s2 + 8 s3 \biggr) 2 - \biggl( 32 s4 - 48 s4 - 12 s4 + 16 s4 \biggr) \biggl( - 4 s4 + 4 s2 \biggr) ds, which is equal to \varepsilon nergy1 \bigl( \scrE (\alpha ) \bigr) = 16 \biggl( 3 7s7 - 7 5s5 + 1 s4 - 1 3s3 \biggr) + \scrC , where \scrC is a constant term and s \not = 0. Example 5.2. Let \alpha be a lightlike Cartan curve in \BbbE 4 1 and k1 = 1, k2 = k3 = 0. Then modified Bishop frame equations for orthonormal vectors \{ \bfT ,\bfN 1,\bfN 2,\bfN 3\} having the form in the Eq. (3) can be stated as the following [12]: \nabla T\bfT = \pi 1\bfN 1, \nabla T\bfN 1 = \pi 1\bfN 2, \nabla T\bfN 2 = 0, \nabla T\bfN 3 = 0, where \pi 1 = 1, \pi 2 = 0, \pi 3 = 0. If \alpha is a lightlike elastic Cartan curve, then \varepsilon nergy1(\scrJ ) = 0. If \alpha is a lightlike nonelastic Cartan curve, then \varepsilon nergy2(\scrE (\alpha )) = 0. ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8 CURVATURE AND TORSION DEPENDENT ENERGY OF ELASTICA AND NONELASTICA . . . 1105 References 1. A. Einstein, Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper, Ann. Phys., 17, 891 – 921 (1905). 2. A. Einstein, Relativity. The special and general theory, Henry Holt, New York (1920). 3. A. Altin, On the energy and pseudoangle of Frenet vector fields in Rn v , Ukr. Math. J., 63, № 6, 969 – 975 (2011). 4. T. Körpınar, New characterization for minimizing energy of biharmonic particles in Heisenberg spacetime, Int. J. Phys., 53, 3208 – 3218 (2014). 5. T. Körpınar, R. C. Demirkol, A new geometric model of the energy functional of lightlike elastic curves in Minkowski 4-space, J. Adv. Phys., 7, № 3, 376 – 381 (2018). 6. L. G. Hughston, W. T. Shaw, Classical strings in ten dimensions, Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. A, 414, 423 – 431 (1987). 7. L. G. Hughston, W. T. Shaw, Constraint-free analysis of relativistic strings, Classical Quantum Gravity, 5, 69 – 72 (1988). 8. L. G. Hughston, W. T. Shaw, Spinor parametrizations of minimal surfaces, The Mathematics of Surfaces, III, Oxford Univ. Press, New York (1989). 9. W. T. Shaw, Twistors and strings, Mathematics and General Relativity, Amer. Math. Soc., 337 – 363 (1988). 10. H. Urbantke, On Pinl’s representation of lightlike curves in n dimensions, Relativity Today, World Sci. Publ., Teaneck, New York (1988). 11. A. E. H. Love, A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity, Cambribge Univ. Press (2013). 12. İlarslan K., A. Uçum, E. Nesovic, On generalized spacelike Manheim curves in Minkowski space-time, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Sect. A, Phys. Sci., 86, № 2, 249 – 258 (2016). 13. P. M. Chacon, A. M. Naveira, Corrected energy of distribution on Riemannian manifolds, Osaka J. Math., 41, 97 – 105 (2004). 14. E. Bretin, J.-O. Lachaud, E. Oudet, Regularization of discrete contour by Willmore energy, J. Math. Imaging and Vision, 40, № 2, 214 – 229 (2011). 15. T. Schoenemann, F. Kahl, S. Masnou, D. Cremers, A linear framework for region-based image segmentation and inpainting involving curvature penalization, Int. J. Comput. Vision, 99, № 1, 53 – 68 (2012). 16. D. Mumford, Elastica and computer vision, Algebraic Geometry and its Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York (1994). 17. G. Citti, A. Sarti, Cortical based model of perceptual completion in the roto-translation space, J. Math. Imaging and Vision, 24, № 3, 307 – 326 (2006). 18. J. Guven, D. M. Valencia, J. Vazquez-Montejo, Environmental bias and elastic curves on surfaces, J. Phys. A, 47 (2014). 19. L. Euler, Additamentum ‘de curvis elasticis’, Methodus Inveniendi Lineas Curvas Maximi Minimive Probprietate Gaudentes, Lausanne (1744). 20. D. A. Singer, Lectures on elastic curves and rods, Dept. Math. Case Western Reserve Univ. (2007). Received 01.09.17 ISSN 1027-3190. Укр. мат. журн., 2020, т. 72, № 8
id umjimathkievua-article-847
institution Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language English
last_indexed 2026-03-24T02:05:52Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv umjimathkievua/bc/8bda5b57f09ead88ab4a5cabdeef9fbc.pdf
spelling umjimathkievua-article-8472022-03-26T11:01:59Z Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space Körpinar, T. Demirkol, R. C. Körpinar, T. Demirkol, R. C. UDC 515.1 We firstly describe conditions for being elastica or nonelastica for a lightlike elastic Cartan curve in the Minkowski space $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$ by using the Bishop orthonormal vector frame and associated Bishop components.  Then we compute the energy of the lightlike elastic and nonelastic Cartan curve in the Minkowski space $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$ and investigate its relationship with the energy of the same curve in Bishop vector fields in $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$.  Here, energy functionals are computed in terms of Bishop curvatures of the lightlike Cartan curve lying in the Minkowski space $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$. УДК 515.1 Спочатку описано умови пружності та непружності світлоподібних пружних кривих Картана у просторі Мінковського $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$ за допомогою ортонормального векторного репера та відповідних компонент Бішопа.  Потім обчислено енергію пружних та непружних світлоподібних кривих Картана у просторі Мінковського $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$ та вивчено іхній зв'язок із енергією тієї ж кривої у векторних полях Бішопа у $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$.  Тут функціонали енергії обчислюються у термінах кривини Бішопа для світлоподібних кривих Картана, що належать простору Мінковського $\mathbb{E}_{1}^{4}$. Institute of Mathematics, NAS of Ukraine 2020-08-18 Article Article application/pdf https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/847 10.37863/umzh.v72i8.847 Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal; Vol. 72 No. 8 (2020); 1095-1105 Український математичний журнал; Том 72 № 8 (2020); 1095-1105 1027-3190 en https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/847/8741
spellingShingle Körpinar, T.
Demirkol, R. C.
Körpinar, T.
Demirkol, R. C.
Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space
title Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space
title_alt Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space
Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space
title_full Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space
title_fullStr Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space
title_full_unstemmed Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space
title_short Curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the Minkowski space
title_sort curvature and torsion dependent energy of elastica and nonelastica for a lightlike curve in the minkowski space
url https://umj.imath.kiev.ua/index.php/umj/article/view/847
work_keys_str_mv AT korpinart curvatureandtorsiondependentenergyofelasticaandnonelasticaforalightlikecurveintheminkowskispace
AT demirkolrc curvatureandtorsiondependentenergyofelasticaandnonelasticaforalightlikecurveintheminkowskispace
AT korpinart curvatureandtorsiondependentenergyofelasticaandnonelasticaforalightlikecurveintheminkowskispace
AT demirkolrc curvatureandtorsiondependentenergyofelasticaandnonelasticaforalightlikecurveintheminkowskispace